The Climb · 2026-07-28 · 38 min
Key moments - from our scoring
Substance score
32 / 100
Five dimensions, 20 points each
Stephanie Silvestre, a technologist and corporate leader, challenges the common fear that AI will replace leaders. Instead, she argues that AI adoption failures stem from lack of strategic clarity, treating AI as software rather than a capability, and relying on outdated quantitative ROI metrics. Throughout her career - from Hewlett Packard to boutique consulting firms - Silvestre has championed qualitative measurement and staff augmentation models. She shares practical examples: how AI completes missing process steps like an employee hoarding knowledge, how fixed-price consulting forced productivity gains, and why hiring three highly-skilled people outperforms hiring five marginally-competent ones on budget. Her approach to Avatar Body, her AI strategy firm, focuses on targeted process improvement rather than company-wide automation. Leaders struggling with AI ROI should reframe expectations toward qualitative gains (reduced conflicts, increased creativity, better data insights) over three-to-six month horizons, she advises. The episode resonates with tech leaders, C-suite executives, and operators managing digital transformation who are frustrated with implementation approaches that ignore human potential and strategic alignment.
Leaders thriving with AI have strategic clarity on what problems they're solving and perceive AI as staff augmentation, not replacement. Those struggling treat AI as generic software without a clear business objective, or fear it will expose their lack of strategic thinking - which is a personal issue, not an AI issue.
Traditional quantitative metrics (hours worked, tasks completed) don't capture AI's real value. Qualitative measurements - work quality, reduced interpersonal conflicts, freed mental capacity for higher-level thinking - are where AI creates the most value, but they take 3-6 months to materialize and are harder to measure.
Take your existing company strategy and identify where AI makes sense to add - don't automate entire workflows. Focus AI on your highest-pain processes to relieve bottlenecks, allowing employees to shift from tactical to strategic work and gain mental bandwidth for creative problem-solving.
Hire fewer highly-skilled people at fair market rates; they deliver better results, reduce your workload stress, eliminate the need to manage marginal performers, and keep the team properly motivated. You stay in budget while improving outcomes.
If you aren't afraid of hiring a smart human who challenges you, you shouldn't fear AI. It identifies gaps in your knowledge and completes processes you can't fully articulate - much like a capable colleague who figures out missing steps you couldn't explain.
Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.
A handful of genuinely useful ideas appear (AI exposing strategic gaps in leaders, qualitative ROI over quantitative, company-wide vs siloed adoption), but they are severely diluted by the host's lengthy paraphrasing of every point, generic leadership anecdotes, and a promotional close. The ratio of novel ideas to filler is poor for a 38-minute episode.
AI is not software by itself. AI is. I perceive AI as a, as, as a social construct. It changes how we behave, it changes how we interact with each other.
where I feel like leaders are concerned about AI is because now the AI exposes their, their lack of strategy. And the AI can do half of what you can do. So you don't have a leg up anymore because you can tactically complete stuff.
The framing of AI as a social construct and the observation that AI will expose tactically-competent-but-strategically-weak leaders are mildly counterintuitive, and the 'five of seven steps' analogy is vivid. However, the rest recycles well-worn AI-adoption advice (get clarity, assign a champion, think company-wide) without any first-principles challenge to conventional thinking.
I gave it four of the seven steps that it needed to do and it figured out the other three steps. And I thought we've all been on a team or worked in where there's one person that refuses to share how they do their job.
If you perceive AI as hiring an additional person, right, as a leader, are you afraid of hiring another human? If you're not, then why would you be afraid of bringing AI?
Stephanie Silvestre has genuine practitioner credentials - HP Latin American HQ, boutique consulting, and now running an AI consultancy - and speaks from real client engagements rather than pure theory. However, she is an independent consultant marketing her own services on the show, not a recognised operator who has scaled AI adoption inside a major enterprise, which caps the caliber score.
I just went to a potential customer and I, I listened to what their pain points are and I flowed out their uh, their workflow and I said where you want to put AI the rest of it have the humans do.
I was working at a company, and they said to me, stephanie, if you want to make more money, you have to become a leader.
There are a few concrete stories (3 hires instead of 5, the HP internship with the 12-hour newspaper-reader, an employee whose new job paid twice as much) that add colour, but the episode contains almost no named client outcomes, no revenue or productivity metrics, no timelines, and no named companies beyond a decades-old HP internship. The AI advice stays largely at the abstract workflow level.
I remember at another company they, they gave me a budget to hire five people... I went back and I said, what if I hire three people?
the spreadsheets have different names... just you m. Give. You give the AI a data map. Hey, when you see L name and that's, that's last name.
The host spends nearly as much airtime as the guest restating her points back to her in extended paraphrases, never challenges a claim, and closes with an overt sales pitch for the guest's consultancy. Questions are broad and generic ('what separates leaders who thrive vs struggle?'), and there are zero follow-up probes that push for data, mechanisms, or contrary evidence.
I think, uh, leaders, if you are struggling to get the roi, as Stephanie mentioned, try to focus more on the qualitative aspects rather than the quantitative.
if you are a C level executive, if you are a, ah, entrepreneur wanting to execute AI, number one, call Stephanie, connect with her team.
Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.
Will AI replace leaders - or simply reveal who is leading well? AI is changing the workplace faster than ever, but the biggest challenge isn't the technology. It's how leaders respond to it. In this episode of The CLIMB Leadership Development & Confident Leader Podcast , Rahul Karan Sharma sits down with technology executive, entrepreneur, and AI innovator Stephanie Sylvestre to explore how leaders can confidently navigate the AI era without losing the human side of leadership. Stephanie shares practical insights on leading through uncertainty, building high-performing teams, making better hiring decisions, and using AI as a tool to amplify people - not replace them. If you're a leader wondering how AI will impact your career, your team, or your organization, this conversation offers practical strategies to lead with greater confidence.
Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.
Speaker A: Welcome M. To the Confident Leader podcast, the place where we explore how people move from potential to real influence in their leadership and life. Most leaders today aren't struggling with AI or as we call artificial intelligence. They are struggling with what it means for them. Will it replace me? Will it expose my gaps? Or will it elevate my leadership? The truth is, uh, is not the disruption our mindset about it is. And, uh, today's conversation is about shifting that mindset. We have our guest, who is coming from where she has moved mountains. She has moved people from places. She had made people comfortable when it comes to dealing with artificial intelligence. I'm your host, Rahul Karan Sharma, and our guest is someone who sits right at the intersection of technology and human potential. She is a technologist, entrepreneur, and corporate leader on a mission to help professionals and organizations not just to adapt to AI, but thrive with it. What makes her powerful is this. She doesn't just talk about AI as a tool.
Speaker B: She.
Speaker A: She brings it to life as a capability. Ladies and gentlemen, put your hand together and welcome Stephanie Silvestre to our show. Stephanie, how are you doing today?
Speaker B: Thank you. I'm doing well. Thank you for having me. I'm super excited to be having this conversation. I'm just looking forward to it. Thank you.
Speaker A: Yes. And I think, uh, today at the industry, the way it is evolving, the way everyone is going mad about AI spending millions, billions of dollars, and still they are asking this question, is it helping me? Is it giving me the roi? So we definitely want to uncover all those aspects because you work very closely with that. But before we dive into AI, our audience want to learn about you as a leader. So share with us about your leadership journey. What made you be the person that you are today?
Speaker B: It's kind of really interesting, right, because, uh, they say that leaders are born and some are created, and I think that I'm a little bit of both. I've always been the person that just will go in and just start doing things while everybody's sitting around talking about what the problem is. I'm like, let's just fix it. But I also learned how to be a leader. And I remember I, uh, was working at a company, and they said to me, stephanie, if you want to make more money, you have to become a leader. Because in our company, leaders are the ones that get paid more. And. And at first I was resistant, and then I said, no, I'm gonna. I'm gonna take an academic approach to it. And I took my time. I did a lot of research on on what it was like to be a good leader and listened to different people's uh, opinions and input and then said this is how I wanna be a leader. How do I show up as my most authentic self? And so when I think about being a leader, I feel like I'm a good leader. If my employees, my team members are a little bit irritated with me and let me tell you why.
Speaker A: Mhm.
Speaker B: They're a little bit irritated with me because I am pushing them out of their comfort zone and I'm demanding that they do things that they have told me they can't do. And I, I know that I am m a good leader when they come back and they say to me, Stephanie, I'm glad that you did this. And I remember once I had this person and I said to her I'm going to hire you and you have two years to find a home. Uh, this is not like uh, this is not the job that, that, that you're, you were put on this art for. And at year one and a half I said what happened? How's the job search come in? And she looks at me, I said yeah, how's your job search going? And then I continued and you know, I worked with her. I said two year marks coming up. And she went and she said, told somebody else that I was, I was trying to fire her. And I, and I said to the Edison person, like I said yeah, absolutely. I told her she doesn't, she doesn't find a new job, I will fire her. And the person's like what? I said because she's wasting her potential here. And so she did find a, she found a new job and she found a job in a uh, in a new city where she had a extended network of people that could support her. The job paid twice what she was making and she was really mad with me when she left. I was okay. And uh, about a year and a half later after she had gotten another promotion at that job, she, she reached out and said thank you and, and for me that, that was a sign that my leadership skills ability tactic is working. Because leadership's not about making people comfortable. Leadership is about seeing people's potential and then helping them see their own potential and then helping them maximize that potential. And if you focus on having people see, see their potential, lean into their potential and maximizing their potential, then you will win because you can then just co dream you don't have to spend time giving people detailed steps. Co dream. I, I, I have another person right now and they said they want to be compensated at a, at a certain uh, rate. And I said that's a reasonable ask. But you're not, you're not operating as a person that should be compensated in that rate, but I will happily mentor you to get to be compensated at that rate. And some people are like, well, like why would you like actively help her get a higher paying salary? I said, because by developing her, I develop myself. And by developing her, my company is in a better place. I want the highest skilled employees I could possibly have. And so I have been mentoring and helping her and, and I, and, and uh, and the first few times I could see she was utterly annoyed with me. Completely and utterly annoyed with me. And wow. And, and then she, I, I said, how can I help you? She's like, if you give me detailed steps. And I said if I give you detailed steps, then you people at the rate that you want to get at, don't get detailed steps. They get vision and sometimes they get a uh, dream, but they don't get detailed steps.
Speaker A: Detail steps. Yeah. Yeah. Wow. I think what you have been sharing Stephanie is normally people don't share or don't, they are not vocal about it. In leadership, people are all talking about how they can please people, how they can. It's something like they want to win an election. But I think uh, the first golden nugget that you have shared with our audience is leadership is not about making people comfortable. Leadership is all about unleashing the true potential of your people. And the million dollar point for me, you just mentioned where an employee came to you for a salary raise and how you handle that situation. Honestly, in my 20 years of career I have not dealt. That's a very smart way of uh, looking at it because when an employee is operating at a higher level, you definitely, it's a win, win for everyone. But what as a leader and uh, I'm just going back to that stage. What goes in our mind is the budget. We have a budget, we just have to operate on that budget. But we never go out of that box. And what you did was definitely not a box thinking. So thank you for sharing that. Really a, ah, great way to handle a salary raise, uh, from an employee. Very well said.
Speaker B: Absolutely. I mean I believe that if you create, create an environment where employees are properly compensated, they will focus more on your work because they won't have money issues or they won't have the distractions that come with not having sufficient money. I remember at another company they, they gave me a budget to hire five people and and, and the budget to hire those five people, I would have had to hire, uh, like not fully skilled people or I would have hired high, highly skilled people and be paying them exploitive wages. None of those two things. I, uh, I looked at it and, and I mean this, this is like all from a self preservation standpoint as well. I was like, if I have a bunch of people that are marginally competent, that means I, my life becomes miserable. And if I am knowingly exploiting somebody with their compensation, how do I sleep at night? How do I get to enjoy my compensation that I know that I've negotiated for? And so I went back and I said, what if I hire three people? And uh, we will, we will not adjust the workload. I, if I hire three highly competent people, we can get all of this work done. So they said, as long as you stay in budget. So I did. I hired three people and we crushed it. And everybody was happy because they were getting compensated at a reasonable price. And it was a little bit for me because good for me as well. I mean, just to be brutally honest, when they got irritated with me and they went to go look for another job and they were told what they were making and the recruiters were like, we, we, we don't like, you're, you're at the top of the scales or sometimes outside of the scale. And then they would come back and they, they would like adjust. And, and so what you've done is, what I've done is I've created, created an environment where I say, I respect you, I appreciate you, but I also expect you to bring your A game all the time. And so I have done my part in creating this environment. I'm going to hold your feet to the fire for you to show up in a respectful manner and appreciate the environment I created. So mutual respect, mutual admiration, preservation of dignity.
Speaker A: Mm.
Speaker B: It's, it's a scary place to be as a leader because sometimes you, you do a, a bad hire and that person, all they do is exploit. But then when you do a bad hire and that person exploits as a leader, it's your responsibility to cut loose as soon as possible. And, and, and so I am comfortable hiring people. I'm comfortable helping them find a new home that, that is more aligned with their personality and their worldview and their work ethics. I'm completely fine with that.
Speaker A: Nice. Well, I think, uh, what you have really demonstrated is not seen by many leaders, specifically in the tech world. It is more about the numbers. It has become a numbers game rather than the Skill game. Everyone wants to have those 20, 30 people and they just consume their budget in getting those people. But what you are doing is, or what you have done in fact in your previous engagement is hiding the one who really deserve the job and paying them well. So when they are paid well, they are bringing their A game. And again, it is not that they will bring the regime we need as leaders have to hold them accountable to bring their A game.
Speaker B: So that's uh, Absolutely. I mean we're just human beings. I mean, everybody just wants to hang out on the beach or go hiking. I mean like, and I'm not saying this from disparaging anybody, I'm just, just basic facts. I mean like, if I left up to my own devices, will I work or will I slack off? Probably be a little bit slacking off.
Speaker A: Correct? Absolutely. So Stephanie, uh, coming back from the AI perspective, what we see is many leaders, they are very unsure of the use of AI. I mean, they know that AI will help them, but still somewhere back in their mind they are also thinking that AI will replace them. So you work with technology leaders, you work with C level suites. So from your perspective, what separates the leader who is thriving in AI versus who's struggling with AI?
Speaker B: I think there's two things, right? So I had a client and uh, they're, they were just focused on like, just train, just train people on how to use AI. I've, um, had a few clients that like that. And it was very frustrating and unfulfilling engagement. I'll tell you why, because they were perceiving AI as another piece of software. Like it's word, like, hey, just come train on Word. Let me tell you all the cool things that word can do. Let me tell you all the cool things AI can do. To what end? Where's the strategy? Where's the, the, the pain points that you're trying to address? With AI not clearly articulated, then AI is not useful. And uh, then secondly, AI is not software by itself. AI is. I perceive AI as a, as, as a social construct. It changes how we behave, it changes how we interact with each other. And social construct has a element of humanness to it. I'm not saying that we're at AGI, so please nobody send Raul a whole bunch of, uh, testy emails and comments. But what I'm saying is that if you perceive AI as hiring an additional person, right, as a leader, are you afraid of hiring another human? If you're not, then why would you be afraid of bringing AI? Now, of course there are some Leaders that are afraid of hiring humans. And there are leaders that are afraid of hiring humans that are smarter than they are. M. And that is not an AI issue, that's a personal issue. And uh, what I say to people and the best implementation are the ones where the leader has clarity on what goal they're trying to accomplish with AI that uh, the leaders is processing AI as a staff augmentation solution. So my marketing team is overwhelmed. My social media team can't keep up with the posts. Will create a social media AI agent that helps them write posts that has on um, brand that has or hashtags. And now they can produce more posts in less time. And what they're doing is editing, reviewing and editing the posts and then scheduling it. It's changing how they work. You're moving them from tactical to strategic. So even if you're an entry level person, you now have to have uh, an element of strategy to your job. And, and, and that's again, right. There's a lot of people in leadership positions because they were really good at tactical things, but they were not very strategic. And so where I feel like leaders are concerned about AI is because now the AI exposes their, their lack of strategy. And the AI can do half of what you can do. So you don't have a leg up anymore because you can tactically complete stuff. I think the thing that uh, hit me, I was using the AI one day and asking it to do something and I gave it four of the seven steps that it needed to do and it figured out the other three steps. And I thought we've all been on a team or worked in where there's one person that refuses to share how they do their job. And if they share, they'll give you five of the seven steps. And then when you can't do it, they'll be like, no, no, no, it's okay, let me just do it for you. It'll be quicker. And because you've just spun for two hours, you're frustrated. You're like, fine, thank you for being my 19 child. Now you, uh, gave me five of the seven steps. I gave it to the AI. The AI said here are the other two steps. That is what AI is going to bring. And so for the leaders that are looking at AI as staff augmentation to amplify their employees, not to replace them, they're going to start seeing that kind of result. Interpersonal disputes go down, productivity goes up, conflicts are removed, people aren't spinning as much as they used to. Um, people feel More fulfilled, uh, because they're now doing higher level thinking.
Speaker A: M and I think where you mentioned about is the differentiation is the clarity in the approach, clarity in the strategy and clarity in the goal that you want AI to achieve. And as long as the leaders have clarity, they will see the results, which is higher productivity, reduction in number of conflicts, a reduction in the number of people related issues. All those things will fall in place. But before that, you need to have the clarity as to why you need AI and what that AI will do for you. So Stephanie, apart from clarity, uh, still when I talk to the tech leaders, I see that they are still gung ho in terms of the investment on the AI part and their founders or their venture capitalists, they are asking for that roi, so they are still not getting that roi. So apart from having clarity, is there anything that they are missing because of which AI is failing for their organization? What has been your observation when you work with your clients?
Speaker B: So the traditional ris don't work anymore, but it doesn't mean you don't have RIs, you still have RIs. It's just the traditional RIs are more qualitative and you know, we struggle with measuring qualitative outcomes. It's much easier to do quantitative things, right? Black and white, very easy. But it's really, it's the qualitative, the gray area that's really where you're finding the most, the most fertile ground. So you know, being able to use the AI to do qualitative assessment, what is the quality of the work that you're producing? Uh, and I will tell you that from this beginning of my career, I've been anti quantitative measurements. So let me tell you why I've been anti quantitative measurements. There's two stories. One is when I was an intern at Hewlett Packard, I was at the Latin American headquarters and I didn't have a car, so I had to get to work really, really early and then get leave really late because I had to deal with the bus schedule. I didn't want to have to stand. So there was this gentleman that would get to work at 7 o' clock in the morning and he would leave at 7:00 every night. 12 hours. You're doing quantitative measurement. This guy is an awesome employee. 12 hours. Most people are working 8 hours, 9 hours. He's working 12 hours consistently every day. What did he produce in those 12 hours? Nobody still knows what he. Nobody could tell. I still don't know what he did. No idea. He read all the, all the Latin American newspapers every single day. And then the second thing is, uh, if you're really good at your job and you can get your job done really quick and of high quality, why are you then forced to sit in a seat for the rest of the day? Even when you finish your task for the day? Quantitative measurement says you have to be there for 12 hours, you have to be there for eight hours. So I had, I got to work at this boutique consulting firm, this is back in the 1990s, and they were doing fixed pricing. Now AI is forcing you to do fixed pricing because now you have to do value add pricing, not like just hourly because you can't charge the client five hours of work if you use the AI and you got it done in an hour and a half because that's stealing M. Right. So they did fix fixed price. And because they did fix price, they could, they could, they could assign me three projects at the same time. And I was delivering high quality things. And so at the end of the year they gave me a really nice raise. If they were forced to do hourly, I would be stuck on one client because I could only work. I uh, could only do one bill, one client at a time, or I would have had to work 18 hours, what, 24 hours in a day, which is not possible. And then, uh, I would not have gotten, helped them bring in increased revenue. And so then it would have been hard to justify the additional raise. So qualitative measurements has always been my thing and it's really not as hard as we think. I mean we can read something and know if it's well written or not. We, we could, I mean we could talk to somebody. Like I can talk to somebody, especially if they're in it or something like that. And I could tell if they actually know what they're doing or not.
Speaker A: Correct. So I think, uh, leaders, if you are struggling to get the roi, as Stephanie mentioned, try to focus more on the qualitative aspects rather than the quantitative. Because quantitative may not always be the right thing to do when it comes to measuring the uh, impact of AI. And I think what point is coming to my mind that sometimes, so this is a disruption in my way because you have been used to look at that quantitative. So what you are doing is you are again, for the effectiveness you are looking at quantitative, but the level playing field is very different. You don't have to do quantitative, you have to do qualitative. So if you are still focusing on the roi, focus on that qualitative aspect that will help you showcase and again it is not something that you will get overnight. It is a uh, it's a work in progress. It's you are here in the long term. You, this is not overnight results. Probably in three to six months you will start seeing the uh, results in a way which probably you are not used to. So we, as leaders we need to get used to of measuring the qualitative aspects. Thank you for sharing that. And Stephanie, uh, I would want at this time I want you to talk about Avatar Body, uh, which is one of your uh, brainchild and you position itself as a partner and not just as a product. Help us understand what gaps do you see in how organizations are adapting AI and the way you lead, uh, to build it the way you want it to lead the way you want to your clients to manage their AI adoption. Enlighten us.
Speaker B: So I see people saying I'll uh, buy get AI for this one person on a team or this two people on the team. That is, that is not. You need a company wide strategy for AI as that gets people like oh no. But when I say you need a company wide strategy for AI is you need to take your existing company strategy and see where it makes sense to add AI. So I just went to a potential customer and I, I listened to what their pain points are and I flowed out their uh, their workflow and I said where you want to put AI the rest of it have the humans do. I didn't put the whole workflow is in AI. I just here, here's where you can really maximize your AI. I mean because what you want to do is you want to look at your processes and the processes with the biggest pain point, that's the pain points are what you want to give to AI because what that does is it relieves the person and then allow. Allows them to, to focus on more complex uh, issues and makes them more creative. Right. It's kind of like if you spend all day fighting with a bunch of spreadsheets to get all the data aligned. You don't even have the mental capacity even if you might have the desire to then uh, go through that, that those spreadsheets and like extract nuggets and see patterns that maybe well give the AI the job of normalizing the spreadsheets for you. You can give. If the spreadsheets have different names and you know, I don't know why we can't standardize on L name is last name. No, everybody has to put different. Whatever just you m. Give. You give the AI a data map. Hey, when you see L name and that's, that's last name. AI figures out the rest, normalize the data for you. Then you're sitting there looking at the data and then now you can start asking the AI questions and be like hey, go through the spreadsheet. It's, it's, it's 1500 rows. Go through the spreadsheet and tell me do you notice this pattern? Do you notice this other pattern? So that's, that's practical application of AI in a way that keeps human in the loop, amplifies your, your employees and, and gets to more insights. And now the employee is like man, at the end of the day he's like oh my goodness, I just realized that we are overspending on X. Yeah.
Speaker A: And I think at times I also noticed that specifically with the use of AI, we humans, we are over complicating things and AI is there to make our life simple. AI is there to make our life easy. But if we are over complicating it, if we are getting overwhelmed, then probably that AI is you are not using the best way to AI to help you. And uh, I think as you very unique example or very simple example that you gave is that uh, Excel spreadsheet, the uh, L is the last name. Why we are making it too complicated, why we are disrupting that. There's no need to disrupt that aspect because if you have, if there are 10 people managing spreadsheet in your company and if they all are using different way to use the uh, instead of last name, first name, they're using first name last name. It will, it will create issue when it comes to uh, getting the uh, data output. So let's make sure that we are simplifying things, not over complicating uh for AI because with AI, AI will keep you on the edge. As Stephanie was telling uh earlier that how as a leader we need to keep our employees on the edge. AI will keep you at the edge and there is no limit to AI. So unless and until you put a limit that hey, do not ask me more than two questions on this aspect, we keep on asking you questions and then it can keep you taking on to a different level altogether. So I think uh, what you mentioned is making sure that you know what your end goals are when it comes to AI. The other thing which I'm also learning is AI is not for one team or one person or one department. It is a company wide. So if you are a leader utilizing or trying to see how AI can help you have that macro vision don't look at the micro vision to save cause. Okay, let me do it in one team, let me see the impact and then I will replicate to the overall organization. That may not be the right approach. And uh, on that note Stephanie, if there are C level executive of a mid sized company listening to our conversation and they want to implement AI, what would be your advice? Where they should start, where they should begin, uh, what should be their initial few steps? If they're thinking to implement AI, obviously
Speaker B: they should be calling me to help me help them implement. But that notwithstanding, uh, clarity on what it is you're trying to get out of AI, not being overly ambitious. Ensure that there's a champion. Even if you have external people helping you, you still need an internal champion for AI. Ensure that AI is um, everybody's responsibility. Mhm. And hold everybody accountable for their, the, the successful implementation of AI.
Speaker A: Got it. All right, so I know you all are listening to our episode. If right now may not be the time, but maybe 10 minutes later, when we end our conversation, pick up your phone and connect with Stephanie. Because I always see that why there are hesitation in us, uh, specifically the type A personalities to ask for help. I always believe that you ask for help not to look weak, but ask for help to become stronger. So if you are struggling, no matter how much portfolio you are handling as a CIO or a cto, still you may need help. And there is no harm in taking help. It is always about you becoming stronger. So uh, connect with Stephanie and her team and they will do a good job, they will take good care of you. And I think what I have learned about Stephanie's model is if they have not the right team, they will also let you know. So they will not take away things from you just because you are having the conversation. Her motto, her job is to make sure that you are successful. Whether if they are not the right team, they will recommend, they will give the recommendation and they will tell you what needs to be done. But based on my research, uh, about her, most of the time they will be able to support you. But if there is one out of 10 chances, they will let you know that they are not the right team and they will guide you for the further action. So thank you Stephanie for uh, doing
Speaker B: that and I really appreciate, I really appreciate the opportunity. I enjoyed the podcast. I love these questions. It's always good. I find that coming on podcasts, it's a, it's a, it's a opportunity to be reflective and retrospective on what is it that I'm doing. And how does this all pull together?
Speaker A: Absolutely. And before we move to our last segment, which is the Rapid Fire, Stephanie, what is the best way for people to connect? Connect with you?
Speaker B: Um, you can connect with me.
Speaker A: Okay.
Speaker B: StephanieVatarBuddy. AI or you can look at, uh, connect with me via LinkedIn. Stephanie Sylvester.
Speaker A: Yes. And we will include that in show notes. So people who are listening to us on Spotify or Apple podcast, uh, you may not be able to see what Stephanie is pointing out. She's pointing out to her background, where she has her credentials, where she has her, uh, website. So we will include that in the show notes for you.
Speaker B: Okay, great.
Speaker A: Thank you, Stephanie. So now, uh, we will move to our fun rapid, uh, fire round. There will be five questions coming to you and we would want you to answer instantly. All right.
Speaker B: Okay, let's go.
Speaker A: So the first one, what is one leadership skill you wish someone had taught you earlier?
Speaker B: The importance of, uh, being vulnerable as a leader so that, that, that you don't have to know everything. In fact, the more you say I don't know, the more people feel empowered and they will, will rise to the occasion.
Speaker A: I hope my all my listeners are listening to this, my aspiring leaders. It's not about just knowing it all. We are human being and there will be many things that you will not know, except that you don't know. It's always good to be that curious person, that curious learner. There is always. Learning is forever. So thank you for sharing that, uh, wisdom. Stephanie, what is your favorite quotation that you live by?
Speaker B: Every disappointment is for the better.
Speaker A: M. Wow. One daily routine. You never skip.
Speaker B: I guess I would have to say I brush my teeth every day.
Speaker A: Okay. All right. Are you a morning person or a night owl?
Speaker B: It all depends. Uh, when I'm on my natural rhythm, I will get up about six. And I am way more productive and creative. But I've also found that, uh, if I can stay up past 11, 12 o' clock at night, I guess it's dead. I guess it's still morning. At 12 o' clock in the early mornings is when I'm more productive. So I guess from 1am Till about 9, 10am I most productive. It all depends on when. Whether I'm waking up or not.
Speaker A: Okay, got it. And the final one, uh, if your career were a Netflix series, what would be the title of season one be?
Speaker B: Let's see, it would be, uh, Strange Connections.
Speaker A: Strange Connections.
Speaker B: Strange Connections. So I take pride in meeting random people and connecting with them and then developing friendships. With them and maintaining that friend, those friendships. I think the, the, the, the. The last friendship that we created, uh, we didn't really maintain. We're not. We. We didn't get their contact info, so we, we couldn't create a friendship with them. Was in 2024, my mom and I went to Nairobi and, uh, she wanted to do a tour with the street kids, with the farmer street kids. And uh, we went. We. The. The tour was full online. So we said, we're going to go where the tour is going to start. And so we go where the tour where Google says, this tour, Google Maps says coordinate, said it's tour is going to start and we can't find the tour. So I said, maybe we, like, maybe Google made a mistake. I mean, like, Google can make mistakes. It is Nairobi after all. And so I walk over to another place that maybe could be, and I come back and I see my mom talking to this, uh, this gentleman, and she's like, this is our tour guide. I was just like, this is not our tour guide, but he was our tour guide. And, uh, and then he says, here's this other person. So his name was Tsunami. I. That, that's, that's what he's. That's his nickname. And then he's. This other guy comes, and his name was Priest, and he had lots of resemblance of my brother. And my mom was like, this is it. And so we just met these gentlemen on the side of the street, uh, had conversations with them and said, yeah, like we'll walk around Nairobi for two hours with you. And it was, it was great. They took us to parts of Nairobi that I don't think the Nairobi Tourist Board would want tourists to go, but it was, it was real. So Strange Connections would be the name of my Netflix series, season one.
Speaker A: Nice. Thank you.
Speaker B: Uh, thank you.
Speaker A: On that note, I, uh, will also would want to share my, uh, learnings from the show. Stephanie, there has been a lot of golden nuggets that were dropped by you and listeners or people watching us on YouTube. This is now the time for you as well to drop in your comments, your learnings from the show. So yes, AI is there for real. AI will stay for long. Whether you want to stay away, it will come to you. It will come in your life. So more and more we learn about AI would be better. The first learning I had, uh, from the leadership perspective, and then such a noble thing that Stephanie did in her leadership role is leadership is not about comforting people when your people are uncomfortable. And it's okay when People are not liking you as a leader. That is what your true job. And I draw this parallel because my wife normally talks about that. A good parent is a parent. When kids don't like like them, kids hate them because there is times when parents will not be agreeing to whatever kids want to do because kids wants to do all great things which probably is not good for their health or for their body. So same thing is under leadership as well. Be a leader who is truly unleashing their true potential. So that's number one learning for me. Number two, uh, the thought process that Stephanie is bringing around the AI. AI is a social construct. As she mentioned, it also has an element of humanness. And for AI to become successful, one of the aspect that leaders needs to look into it is the clarity on the goals that you need to have from the implementation of AI. AI is not there just for one person or one team. AI is for company wide. Whenever you are thinking to implement AI, focus on implementing company wide. On the same note, we uh, also learned that the traditional ROI measure will not work when it comes to measuring uh. AI focus on doing the quality measures and that quality measures will come over time. And lastly, I will end with this. If you are a ah, C level executive, if you are a, ah, entrepreneur wanting to execute AI, number one, call Stephanie, connect with her team. They will be able to guide you, they will be able to support you. Number two, get clarity. Be clear on what you want to do and why you want to do. Don't be overly ambitious. You know, keep your feet on the ground. Have an internal champion. You need that champion, that change manager or the change agents who is really helping you throughout the process. And AI, AH is all about knowing. Don't over complicate AI. AI is there to make your life simple. If AI is making you overwhelmed, if AI is taking your night sleeps away, there is something not doing well. And that's when you need to connect with Stephanie and her team. So thank you Stephanie for being here on our show. We are truly blessed to share uh, your wisdom with our listeners on the Client the conference Leader podcast. And thank you. You are the people who are making us grow and making us uh, the top 1.5% globally. So thank you again and thank you listeners.
Speaker B: Thank you for the opportunity and just remember, leadership is not a popularity contest.
Speaker A: M. Wow. All right, thank you. Bye bye.
Speaker B: Bye.
Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.