The B2B Podcast Index
Index
All categories
MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
MethodologySubmit
Best of:MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
An independent project byFame
SearchBest episodesGuestsInsightsMethodologySubmit a podcast
Index/Leadership/Your Work Friends
Your Work Friends artwork

The Next Rules of Work w/ Gary Bolles

Your Work Friends · 2026-06-30 · 54 min

0:00--:--

Key moments - from our scoring

Substance score

50 / 100

Five dimensions, 20 points each

Insight Density10 / 20
Originality9 / 20
Guest Caliber10 / 20
Specificity & Evidence12 / 20
Conversational Craft9 / 20

Gary Bolles, author of *The Next Rules of Work* and global fellow at Singularity University, unpacks what's genuinely changing in the workplace due to AI versus hype - and crucially, who bears the real risk. He argues that AI's impact varies dramatically by industry and organizational structure: highly automated tech companies see immediate disruption, while traditional utilities and government agencies change slowly due to legacy systems and people-centric factors. The pace and scale of change matter more than the technology itself. Bolles identifies young people as the population facing the steepest challenge, citing McKinsey's reversal on hiring junior talent once clients and leadership recognized that tools amplify rather than replace early-career workers. For organizations and parents navigating this shift, Bolles emphasizes rethinking hiring manager incentives, moving away from the "career ladder" metaphor toward a "trail network" model where workers navigate multiple paths and frequent transitions. He advocates teaching young people agency, skill-building discipline, and the ability to decode market signals - preparing them for continuous career reinvention rather than single-track advancement.

Key takeaways

  • →AI adoption speed varies dramatically by industry - tech companies see rapid change while legacy organizations move slowly due to people and process barriers, not technology limitations.
  • →Young people are the most affected population by workplace disruption, not because of AI alone, but because hiring managers lack incentives to invest in junior talent development when facing rapid change.
  • →McKinsey reversed its decision to hire fewer junior staff after realizing AI tools could dramatically increase their effectiveness, suggesting strategic approach to junior hiring can create competitive advantage.
  • →Career paths are now a 'trail network' of intersecting options requiring continuous skill development and market signal reading, rather than a single 'ladder' up one company.
  • →Parents should focus on developing children's agency, mindset, and ability to learn new skills rather than guaranteeing a college degree, which no longer guarantees employment security.

In this episode

  1. 1AI Hype vs. Reality: What's Actually Changing
  2. 2How Different Industries and Organizations Experience AI Differently
  3. 3Young People as the Most Affected Population
  4. 4The Hiring Manager as the Critical Linchpin
  5. 5Career Paths as Trail Networks, Not Ladders
  6. 6Building Resilience Through Diverse Work Portfolios
  7. 7Education's Role in Developing Agency and Skills for an Uncertain Future

Mentioned

Gary BollesMel PlattFrancesca RaneriLinkedIn LearningSingularity UniversityMetaMcKinsey

Guests

Gary Bolles

Topics in this episode

LinkedIn LearningAI adoption and implementationSingularity UniversityCareer development and portfolio workHiring manager incentivesMcKinsey consulting model shiftsSocial and emotional learning in educationSkills training and reskillingTech company workforce practicesMeta layoff strategies

Questions this episode answers

What types of organizations are most and least impacted by AI right now?

Highly automated tech companies experience immediate AI disruption, while long-term utilities, government agencies, and less-digital organizations change slowly because most change is about people adoption, not just technology deployment. The pace depends on digital maturity, employment laws (countries like Germany with strong worker protections move slower), and organizational culture around workforce decisions.

Why did McKinsey reverse its decision to hire fewer young people?

McKinsey initially planned to reduce junior hiring, thinking tools could replace them, but reversed course after clients discovered McKinsey was using software instead of people while charging the same rates. Leadership also realized AI tools make young workers dramatically more effective, allowing them to accomplish work that previously took years to train - shifting demand from fewer to dramatically more junior hires.

What's the most underestimated shift in how work actually changes?

The hiring manager is the linchpin - not technology. Regardless of company tools or processes, a hiring manager's incentives and disincentives around hiring young people or other disadvantaged populations drive real outcomes. Their willingness to invest in training people to do new work determines whether organizations adapt or exclude people.

What career model should young people adopt instead of the traditional career ladder?

Bolles recommends thinking of careers as a "trail network" - multiple interconnected paths where you follow well-blazed trails, pivot at intersections, or blaze entirely new trails. Young people should pursue a "portfolio of work" (day job plus side projects, startups, freelance) as a rational hedge against uncertainty while developing independence and agency.

What three populations does Gary Bolles say are most affected by workplace transformation?

Young people, their parents, and teachers are the three populations facing the steepest challenges. Young people lack control over hiring decisions; parents struggle to give relevant advice in a rapidly changing job market; teachers must balance delivering knowledge with building social-emotional learning and agency - the real foundation for navigating future work.

What our scoring noted

Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.

Insight Density

10 / 20

The episode contains a handful of genuinely useful observations - McKinsey's reversal on junior hiring, the Novartis unbossing practice, the OpenAI-Upwork partnership, and the Germany vs. US unemployment contrast - but these are distributed unevenly across 54 minutes of meandering conversation heavy on platitudes ('take a deep breath,' 'develop agency,' 'follow your passion') and repetitive framing. The insights-per-minute rate is low.

In the United States, we don't have an employment system. We have an unemployment system. You don't get benefits unless you get fired
Meta did 8,000 workers in a week on one email

Originality

9 / 20

Gary rebrands familiar concepts with new labels - 'trail network' instead of career ladder, 'era of optionality,' 'team guide' instead of manager - but the underlying ideas are standard future-of-work discourse. The 'no such thing as AI' framing is mildly contrarian, and 'young people are a new species' is a provocative but ultimately hollow metaphor. No genuine first-principles or counterintuitive arguments appear.

There is no such thing as AI. There's no such thing as artificial intelligence. It's a marketing label
I don't think this is a new generation. I think this is a new species. I think this is the next - Young people are the next form of humans.

Guest Caliber

10 / 20

Gary Bolles is a credentialed future-of-work commentator - author, LinkedIn Learning educator, Singularity University fellow - but he is a professional thought leader rather than an operator who built or ran a significant enterprise. His observations are drawn from observation and consulting, not from scaling an organization himself, which limits practitioner depth.

I spent more than 50 years of my life in Silicon Valley, so I can gently criticize my brethren and sistren
We're pushing with my c-small consulting company, Chamonix Red this sort of mindset

Specificity & Evidence

12 / 20

The episode does better than average on named examples: Medv's $1.8B two-person AI company, Germany's 5.2→5.6% vs. US 3.7→11.2% unemployment swing during COVID, Novartis's 80,000-employee unbossing and Curiosity Month practices, McKinsey's hiring reversal, and the OpenAI-Upwork partnership. However, several broader claims ('tons of great examples,' 'waves of technology') go unsupported, and the education and social cohesion sections are almost entirely abstract.

it's two people, and they use AI agents to sell GLP-1s fat reduction and weight reduction. And it's just two guys brothers, and $1.8 billion run rate.
In Germany, they went from five point two to five point six percent unemployment because there's a series of laws that say it's - you can't l- just lay people off

Conversational Craft

9 / 20

The hosts ask broadly reasonable questions and land one solid specific follow-up ('Who do you think is doing this really well?'), but there is no meaningful pushback, no challenged claim, and frequent validation responses that shut down productive tension. The conversation functions as a promotional vehicle for Gary's book rather than an interrogation of his ideas.

Oh, I love that.
Who do you think is doing this really well? Because I've been in this space for my entire career.

Conversation analysis

Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.

Most-used words

tools28organization24organizations23young21decisions18humans16skills15different15first14point14human13everybody13technology13help13value13social12

Episode notes

Send us Fan Mail AI isn't just changing jobs. It's changing the rules of work. Every week brings another headline about layoffs, automation, and the future of work - but what's actually happening beneath the hype? This week, we sit down with Gary Bolles , global fellow at Singularity University, author of The Next Rules of Work , and one of the world's leading thinkers on the future of work, to separate signal from noise. Together, we explore: Why AI isn't the biggest disruption - it's the pace of change. Why young professionals may face the greatest challenges (and opportunities). What parents, educators, and leaders need to rethink. Why the "career ladder" is dead - and what replaces it. How organizations can become more human-centered instead of more automated. The skills, mindset, and agency we'll all need to navigate what's next. This isn't a conversation about fearing AI. It's a conversation about building careers, organizations, and communities that are resilient no matter how technology evolves. If you've been wondering what work looks like over the next decade - and what you should do about it - this episode is for you.

Full transcript

54 min

Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.

1 - > one of the reasons that I end my book"The Next Rules of Work," 2 - > the final line in it is,"No human left behind. 3 - > And the reason I want people to understand that we all make 4 - > decisions, and we're making decisions that we often don't 5 - > think have ripple effects in society, but they do. 6 - > Welcome to"Your Work Friends," where we break down the now and 7 - > next of work. 8 - > I'm Mel Platt. 9 - > And I'm Francesca Raneri. 10 - > We're excited about this episode. 11 - > Every week, Francesca and I read another headline around how AI 12 - > is replacing jobs, changing careers, or just completely 13 - > reshaping the workplace, and honestly, it can be really hard 14 - > sometimes for us to separate what's real from what's just 15 - > hype. 16 - > I don't know if others are feeling that way too. 17 - > We certainly are, and that's why we wanted to talk to Gary 18 - > Bolles. 19 - > Gary is one of the world's leading voices on the future of 20 - > work. 21 - > He's the author of"The Next Rules of Work," and he has 22 - > taught more than 1.7 million, learners on LinkedIn Learning, 23 - > and he's also a global fellow at Singularity University, where he 24 - > helps leaders think about the future of work and 25 - > transformation. 26 - > Yeah. 27 - > In this conversation, we really wanted to know from him what are 28 - > the next rules of work. 29 - > We unpack what AI is actually changing, why young people may 30 - > be the most affected, what org... 31 - > What organizations need to rethink, and most importantly, 32 - > what all of us can do to build a career that's resilient, no 33 - > matter what happens next. 34 - > Because the God honest answer is none of us know. 35 - > So if you are like us and are trying to make sense of where 36 - > work is headed, this episode, and I'll tell you, this 37 - > conversation left me feeling a little less anxious and a little 38 - > bit more prepared. 39 - > And hopeful Gary's just awesome, so with that, here's Gary. 40 - > All right, Gary. 41 - > Everybody's talking about AI. 42 - > I don't think we can escape it. 43 - > It's in every headline, every text message, every conversation 44 - > at work, layoffs, skills, the end of jobs. 45 - > What's actually real versus what is super overhyped right now, in 46 - > your opinion? 47 - > Yeah, absolutely. 48 - > So a couple quick bullet points just to give people the red 49 - > threads. 50 - > If you work in a company that is already highly automated oh, I 51 - > don't know, tech companies, yes, you're gonna find there's a lot 52 - > of work that's impacted. 53 - > If you work in an organization that is very long-term utility 54 - > or government agency or something that's been around for 55 - > a long time and it's not very digital, doesn't have a lot of 56 - > technology in place, you're - it's really slow'cause most of 57 - > the change is about people. 58 - > So those are the endpoints. 59 - > And then what are the frictions? 60 - > That is, what slows things down in how people shift to use these 61 - > kinds of new technologies and what speeds it up? 62 - > So again, speeds it up if there's - if you're already 63 - > digital, it speeds it up. 64 - > If the laws of your country allow you to either fire people 65 - > or change the workforce really rapidly, and it slows things 66 - > down a lot if people have been doing the same kinds of work for 67 - > a long time, if, you're in a country like Germany where the 68 - > laws don't let you lay people off very easily. 69 - > And so you just gotta add all those things up and then decide, 70 - > okay, so given the kind of work that I'm doing or where I wanna 71 - > work, kind of company I wanna be in, either if it's a tech 72 - > company, which also unfortunately is proving a lot 73 - > more regularly that they don't care that much about their 74 - > employees, so they're willing to lay them off pretty quickly. 75 - > Meta did 8,000 workers in a week on one email. 76 - > Or you're in an organization really cares about humans and 77 - > really wants to keep people employed then, and wants to 78 - > train them to be able to do the new work and all those sorts of 79 - > things. 80 - > Then you can do the math yourself. 81 - > And then the thing that really drives people crazy, which is 82 - > perfectly understandable, is that it changes so fast. 83 - > I would say always it's sure the technology have a big impact 84 - > depending upon who you are and where, what kind of organization 85 - > you're in, but it's the pace and scale. 86 - > It's that it goes so fast. 87 - > It's you thought you were using the most recent version of one 88 - > tool and now there's another one or - and then it's affecting so 89 - > many people. 90 - > So it, it's being used in so many different organizations. 91 - > So I tell people, just take a deep breath- Yes, it's gonna 92 - > impact different kinds of work roles, and the more you can be 93 - > leveraging the tools yourself, understanding how they might be 94 - > applicable in your work, awesome. 95 - > The one population we can talk more about this that is the most 96 - > affected though, that doesn't have a lot of control is young 97 - > people. 98 - > That's the five alarm fire we have to be dealing with. 99 - > It's not just AI, it's just the ways that work systems work. 100 - > But they're the ones that are really having the most 101 - > challenges right now. 102 - > Yeah. 103 - > I - We're hearing that if an- anecdotally throughout 104 - > conversations in the day-to-day. 105 - > I have friends who have kids graduating from high school 106 - > right now who are choosing not to go to college because 107 - > they're, they don't see the path, so they're leaning into 108 - > trades, which is great. 109 - > We're also, we have a huge gap there that's needed to be 110 - > filled, right? 111 - > So I'm curious about that. 112 - > What's what might be one shift people are underestimating the 113 - > most right now? 114 - > Oh, good question. 115 - > So- the linchpin, like the part of just how work works where the 116 - > rubber meets the road the most has nothing to do with 117 - > technology, and it's the hiring manager. 118 - > I often use words like manager and supervisor and that sort of 119 - > thing. 120 - > But what most people don't really see in the data, which is 121 - > absolutely the biggest influence, is no matter what 122 - > tools your company uses, no matter what kinds of people you 123 - > traditionally hire, no matter whatever those processes are, 124 - > you have a job opening or you have the opportunity to promote 125 - > somebody inside the organization. 126 - > But you're the one who runs the team. 127 - > What are your incentives and disincentives, especially for 128 - > hiring young people? 129 - > But for any population that is gonna get disadvantaged 130 - > potentially by really rapid change, by a need in, for 131 - > developing new skills. 132 - > So just give an example. 133 - > Two years ago, McKinsey said they were gonna hire less young 134 - > people. 135 - > We don't need'em. 136 - > We can just do a lot of that stuff with tools. 137 - > And then two things happened. 138 - > First is their clients figured out that they were using 139 - > software instead of people, but still charging the same rates. 140 - > Oh, no, you don't get to do that Yeah. 141 - > Yeah. 142 - > We can use the tools too. 143 - > And the other thing they realized is, oh, you can make 144 - > these younger people so much more effective in their work, 145 - > and they can do a lot of stuff that it used to take us years to 146 - > train. 147 - > Oh okay, now we need more. 148 - > So that's what McKinsey just said. 149 - > No, we're gonna actually dramatically increase our hiring 150 - > of young people. 151 - > So lots of variance by industries, but the guarantee 152 - > that especially more advanced degrees or degrees from certain 153 - > types of colleges and so on gave you a big leg up, which was true 154 - > in the past, is no longer as true. 155 - > And so when you've got friends that are any listeners have - 156 - > are parents and have kids that are going through this 157 - > decision-making process, I always tell them you, you - 158 - > first off, I have tremendous concern for three populations: 159 - > young people, their parents, and their teachers, because they're 160 - > the ones that are being so dramatically affected. 161 - > I tell the parents,"Look, the rules you knew about encouraging 162 - > your kid to go to a college and get that degree and amortize it, 163 - > there's still plenty of places where you're gonna have 164 - > traditional jobs and that sort of thing, but it's not a 165 - > guarantee." Yeah. 166 - > So the more you can help your kid to be independent, to have 167 - > agency, to make new decisions, to... 168 - > and it's a logical hedge against uncertainty if what your kid 169 - > does is to do what I call a portfolio of work. 170 - > Yeah, they might get a day job, but then they're driving for 171 - > Uber at night and they're working on a startup with their 172 - > friends and so that, that's a hedge strategy, and it's 173 - > perfectly rational. 174 - > Even though parents ask me all the time,"Why won't my kid get a 175 - > real job?" I actually I think this is a healthy shift in a lot 176 - > of ways. 177 - > Something I've always thought even when I was 18 choosing to 178 - > go to college because I was told that was the path to do. 179 - > Yeah. 180 - > That's what success meant. 181 - > It also felt man, I'm too young to be making these big life 182 - > decisions about what I wanna do at 18. 183 - > Yeah. 184 - > I couldn't even choose a meal. 185 - > It was McDonald's number four, so it's interesting now. 186 - > It's like live life a little- Yeah experience a lot of things, 187 - > get really clear about what you want before you start choosing a 188 - > path is actually a little healthy. 189 - > Yeah. 190 - > It's absolutely, and I'll tell you what the rhetoric, the, what 191 - > was the mindset of parents in the past was that there is this 192 - > tiny little window- Yeah where if the kid doesn't go to 193 - > college, they've missed it. 194 - > Yeah. 195 - > That's it. 196 - > You're dead. 197 - > They're, you're- It's over. 198 - > They're Yeah. 199 - > So a friend of mine - And it varies a lot by culture, but 200 - > there's a good friend of mine from India, and he he went to 201 - > his mother when he's graduating high school. 202 - > He said,"Mommy, Mommy-" I don't wanna go to college. 203 - > And the way he tells the story is his mother just looked at him 204 - > and gave it a beat. 205 - > She said"My son, you have three options: engineer, doctor, 206 - > loser." Oh man, that's harsh. 207 - > Yeah, no pressure. 208 - > No pressure. 209 - > So that's the old rules of war. 210 - > He's"No, okay, I, I get..." He chose engineer, but those are 211 - > the old ru- It's what our parents know. 212 - > Yeah. 213 - > What, what is harder is to, to... 214 - > when they don't feel like they actually can give great advice 215 - > about how to navigate a world of work that, that is changing so 216 - > rapidly. 217 - > And so I just- Yeah I do suggest that, look the thing to really 218 - > be thinking about is how you develop agency in your kid, and 219 - > that doesn't mean making decisions for them. 220 - > It means helping them to make the best decisions. 221 - > But to focus on what's next, and I don't mean tomorrow. 222 - > What's the next step they need to take that will help them to 223 - > be able to launch into adulthood? 224 - > And that's a different question. 225 - > Yeah. 226 - > It's very different. 227 - > Yeah, as a first-gen college student myself, that was the 228 - > ans- They were like,"No, this is it, or you lose at life." And 229 - > I'm like,"Okay." Yeah. 230 - > No pressure there. 231 - > But I'm, it's- yeah so it's a healthy shift here happening 232 - > even though there's some uncertainty, it sounds. 233 - > As long as we give them the tool set. 234 - > Yeah. 235 - > So you wanna give them the mindset, agency, take actions. 236 - > They've gotta develop a skill set, and they've gotta have the 237 - > tool set. 238 - > You have to know how to be able to develop the skills that are 239 - > needed, find out, get the signals from the market, what 240 - > it's looking for. 241 - > Yes, have some North Star that pulls you forward, but also know 242 - > what the job market might be looking for or where there might 243 - > be opportunities. 244 - > And we have to help them early on to crack that code because if 245 - > we don't, then they could be making very tactical decisions 246 - > without necessarily realizing they're gonna have to do this 247 - > again and again. 248 - > There's gonna be a lot of career changes. 249 - > Yeah. 250 - > I said in the past we used to... 251 - > the metaphor we used was a jo- was a ladder, right? 252 - > Career ladder. 253 - > Go to one company and work your way up. 254 - > And then Tammy, who was the former CMO of Yahoo! years 10 255 - > years ago, she said"No, I think it's a jungle gym." You go up, 256 - > and you go down. 257 - > I said, the, what I, the image I show now is a trail network. 258 - > I said,"No, it's a trail network." It's a bunch of trails 259 - > that you could follow, and some of them are well blazed and 260 - > really deeply furrowed, and okay, that's the - what many 261 - > people have done before. 262 - > But you're gonna keep hit these constant intersections in your 263 - > own trail, and sometimes you might just blaze a new one. 264 - > And, if you ask people who've been working for any length of 265 - > time, 30, 20 years, the most common thing you're gonna get if 266 - > you say,"How did you get into this line of work?" The response 267 - > will be,"Oh mine was a very non-traditional path." So trail 268 - > network. 269 - > Yeah. 270 - > And so that's what you wanna encourage your kids, is like 271 - > you're either f- following trails or finding new trail or 272 - > blazing new trails. 273 - > But that's what's gonna happen, is that's the picture to have in 274 - > your mind, is that you're gonna have these range of options, and 275 - > what you wanna do is continually make the best choice you can for 276 - > any particular point in time. 277 - > Oh, I love that. 278 - > You're worried about three people, like the kiddos, the 279 - > parents, and the teachers. 280 - > And I think about in order to really like, traverse a trail, 281 - > you kinda need to know how. 282 - > And I'm curious about the connection between your concern 283 - > with teachers and navigating the trails. 284 - > Yeah. 285 - > So first off, education's not monolithic. 286 - > We - there's very different phases of it, from very early on 287 - > like pre-K. 288 - > But there are still things that, that pre-K - e-even in a pre-K 289 - > world you can do to help prepare kids for the future. 290 - > Sure. 291 - > I'm happy to talk about some of those. 292 - > But then you got this K-12 thing, which is again, it's a 293 - > sort of arbitrary box we put around it. 294 - > But those teachers are supposed to be helping you to learn new 295 - > things and helping you to develop skills and get along 296 - > with each other and that sort of thing. 297 - > And their job increasingly has to be focused or that, that has 298 - > this underpinning, this foundation layer of social and 299 - > emotional learning. 300 - > And if what the teachers keep on doing is inde-heavily indexing 301 - > on the bodies of knowledge that they're trying to s-stuff into 302 - > their kids' heads then unfortunately we're missing the 303 - > narrative. 304 - > That's not the key deliverable. 305 - > Key deliverable is to help them to learn how to learn how to 306 - > manage their own emotions, learn how to get along with others, 307 - > learn how to follow some kind of passion in their lives. 308 - > That's really the key deliverable. 309 - > Unfortunately, a lot of our school systems are not designed 310 - > for that. 311 - > And then in what I call the young adult launchpad, the 312 - > college system, the more that the people that are helping you 313 - > to navigate that the trail, they kinda have to know how it works. 314 - > And unfortunately, there's a lot of people that have been in the 315 - > ivory tower for a long time that haven't worked in the real world 316 - > for a long time. 317 - > They don't... 318 - > they actually are able to help with that kind of advice. 319 - > We're pushing with my c-small consulting company, Chamonix Red 320 - > this sort of mindset of what we call switching from being just a 321 - > college or... 322 - > Not just a college, but being college or higher education, to 323 - > being more of a life center. 324 - > Like how do you help them to actually think of this as a 325 - > launchpad? 326 - > And what are the things you would need to do walking in the 327 - > door? 328 - > Yeah, you would touch the career center as you're walking out the 329 - > door. 330 - > "Oh, by the way, I need a job." Yeah. 331 - > Our mindset we wanna encourage for educators, especially in 332 - > higher education, is now walking in the door. 333 - > You wanna make sure that you are equipping these young people, 334 - > this mindset and toolset for life change. 335 - > And then the skill set, like the skills that you're teaching them 336 - > are going to be durable. 337 - > They're gonna be usable again and again for the rest of their 338 - > lives. 339 - > Yeah. 340 - > So funny. 341 - > My think about tenure and all these systems we have- have been 342 - > in place for a very long time, and they need to rapidly shift 343 - > not only academia and K through 12, and it's oh my god, these 344 - > things need to shift in the next two to three years. 345 - > Yeah. 346 - > That's probably not gonna happen in order to meet the moment. 347 - > Yeah. 348 - > I'm also thinking about orgs and how they need to shift too, you 349 - > talk a lot about moving from like things like from jobs to 350 - > skills to tasks. 351 - > What are most organizations gonna be structured like in the 352 - > next few years? 353 - > We've heard anything from it's the biggest organization's gonna 354 - > be 50 people to nothing's gonna change. 355 - > I don't know if I buy either of those. 356 - > Your thoughts? 357 - > So it's all the above. 358 - > So think of it this way. 359 - > So you've got these endpoints in terms of or how organizations 360 - > are structured, and you're right. 361 - > In the same way that our educational institutions were 362 - > shaped, especially in the West, by the industrial era, so one 363 - > teacher, 30 students listening to mind-numbing lectures for the 364 - > entire time that's a production model. 365 - > That's a factory production model. 366 - > And it's the same thing with our organizations is we've got these 367 - > things called hierarchy, which go all the way back to the time 368 - > of Alexander the Great. 369 - > We've got these things called org charts, which were 370 - > originally pioneered by this little company called IBM. 371 - > And what we've done is over and over again, we've got these 372 - > industrial era processes that sort of shove people into these 373 - > slots. 374 - > And now if you were to take any organization in any industry or 375 - > nonprofits, N- NGOs, government agencies, and you were to wipe 376 - > the slate clean and say from start to deliver the same value 377 - > we do for our customers or our constituents How many people 378 - > would we need? 379 - > How much technology would we use? 380 - > And so that's a high-class question that startups can ask 381 - > because they're just starting out. 382 - > So that's how you get a 50-person company that can do a 383 - > tremendous amount. 384 - > They can automate from scratch. 385 - > They can do - They, they could basically decide, make a lot of 386 - > those decisions. 387 - > But Walmart is the largest employer in the United States. 388 - > They don't make decisions like that. 389 - > They don't make a clean slate decision how, how could we run 390 - > our stores with zero people? 391 - > And so that's what you get, is you get these end cases. 392 - > And so the, the - When I show - I, I talk a lot about to help 393 - > people understand is the industry you choose, the 394 - > business you choose, or if you're a nonprofit or NGO, or... 395 - > There's a business model. 396 - > The reason it exists, it provides value to somebody, and 397 - > that then drives ultimately an operating model. 398 - > How many people do you need? 399 - > Where do they go? 400 - > And there's always a history if they've been around, company's 401 - > been around for a long time. 402 - > What you find is that when you get these big resets, like the 403 - > AI tsunami, is there's some organizations treat it as an 404 - > opportunity to go through this complete rethink, complete 405 - > transformation. 406 - > And so yes, you will get some smaller organizations out of 407 - > that. 408 - > But as with a McKinsey, no, we need more people-'cause you're 409 - > gonna find you can create even more value if you give these 410 - > same tools to others. 411 - > And then if you want - some people find it inspirational, 412 - > and some people find it creepy, but there was a company profiled 413 - > in New York Times a couple weeks ago called Medv. 414 - > And it's two people, and they use AI agents to sell GLP-1s fat 415 - > reduction and weight reduction. 416 - > And it's just two guys brothers, and$1.8 billion run rate. 417 - > Now, the agents make up customers. 418 - > They lie about the fact that they're saying it sell, it makes 419 - > its own products, which it doesn't. 420 - > It's all about just selling and it makes up all these social 421 - > media stories and... 422 - > But it's all agents. 423 - > It's all software doing it, and it's two people with an in- 424 - > incredible run rate. 425 - > So that is the dream of a venture capitalist, is to have 426 - > that quote unquote"capital efficient" company. 427 - > But that's not the future I want. 428 - > I want - I don't want a future with millions of one-person 429 - > companies because I don't think that's actually how you create a 430 - > lot of value. 431 - > I think you, you create a lot more value by humans working 432 - > with humans. 433 - > Yeah. 434 - > I think I'm struck with What is the purpose of organizations 435 - > anymore? 436 - > Because i'm looking at one of the fastest growing jobs right 437 - > now is training AI how to do your job at this point. 438 - > And I'm not trying to be super negative about it, but- No, 439 - > yeah. 440 - > Oh, go ahead. 441 - > We don't - Yeah. 442 - > Let me just go into my... 443 - > We don't have a lot of regulation in this country 444 - > around layoffs. 445 - > It feels like we are in a almost brutal capitalist type of 446 - > philosophy around- Yeah get as much profit, get as much rev as 447 - > you can out of this thing, get as much productive - 448 - > productivity and efficiency out of this thing as you can. 449 - > And I'm wondering if that changes in the future or if it 450 - > gets more- Yeah pronounced. 451 - > It's a good question. 452 - > So you have to go back to the fundamentals is what's different 453 - > at the macroeconomic- picture. 454 - > So what is happening with the global economy. 455 - > And so in a downturn in the United States during - I don't 456 - > know if any of your listeners remember the - there, there was 457 - > a global pandemic, but during the, this global pandemic, What? 458 - > What was that? 459 - > the US went from three point seven percent to eleven point 460 - > two percent unemployment in three weeks- Oops in April of 461 - > twenty twenty. 462 - > And so that's an example of a macroeconomic condition that had 463 - > nothing to do with AI. 464 - > ChatGPT had not been released in early twenty twenty. 465 - > ChatGPT three point five had not been released. 466 - > And and it - but it had to do with macroeconomic conditions 467 - > which created mass unemployment. 468 - > But in, in Germany, they went from five point two to five 469 - > point six percent unemployment because there's a series of laws 470 - > that say it's - you can't l- just lay people off, and you've 471 - > got to train them if you tell them they gotta go find another 472 - > job. 473 - > And so there's these macro conditions, and that has a lot 474 - > of either - it's either an accelerant or it's a decelerant. 475 - > And so in the United States, we don't have an employment system. 476 - > We have an unemployment system. 477 - > You don't get benefits unless you get fired, unless you're out 478 - > of work. 479 - > And whereas what we should have is a lot more resources to keep 480 - > us trained, so we're always having work. 481 - > So then you d- drill down into the organization level and if 482 - > you're working for a tech company, which- is already 483 - > highly digitized and may not care that much about its 484 - > employees, then yeah, you're probably gonna find that you're 485 - > you're one of the fir- you're, you - If you're last in, you're 486 - > probably first out. 487 - > That is, you'll, you're very likely to find there's less 488 - > guarantee that you're gonna be kept employed. 489 - > And so this is why we need to go back to this whole thing about 490 - > agency, is we really do need to encourage people to to have a 491 - > lot of agency and to be continually thinking about the 492 - > next step. 493 - > If you look at the studies with, about young people today if you 494 - > look at the waves, I don't use phrases like Gen Z and Gen Y 495 - > 'cause I always say I don't think this is a new generation. 496 - > I think this is a new species. 497 - > I think this is the next - Young people are the next form of 498 - > humans. 499 - > But but if you look at the waves, the most recent wave of 500 - > young people in work, two-thirds when asked the question,"Are you 501 - > already looking for another job?" Answer,"Yes." And it gets 502 - > a lot less as you move up in age. 503 - > And so this is what we call the era of optionality, is it's more 504 - > and more young people especially, and not just, not 505 - > all young people, and not just young people, but more and more 506 - > young people are looking at their digital distraction 507 - > devices continually watching for market signals. 508 - > Are my friends working on a new startup? 509 - > Does some- does a friend down the street in another job have a 510 - > better boss than I do? 511 - > Or so and their - and that means that their loyalty and the 512 - > belief that they would stay working up the career ladder is 513 - > much, much lower. 514 - > Why do you think the younger generation is a different 515 - > species? 516 - > I gotta know that. 517 - > So evolution, I, it's a little bit tongue in cheek, but it's 518 - > not too much. 519 - > It's because- yeah. 520 - > I got a seven-year-old, I understand this. 521 - > Okay. 522 - > Okay, you got... 523 - > Okay, great. 524 - > Then you got it. 525 - > I'm like, please- All right. 526 - > So- please confirm my beliefs. 527 - > Sorry. 528 - > Oh, yeah, absolutely. 529 - > Absolutely. 530 - > Look, at any point in time, ev- so one of the wonderful things 531 - > about evolution whether you're a massive fan of Charles Darwin or 532 - > you just think of it as a metaphor, is that it's continual 533 - > incremental innovation. 534 - > It's constantly trying out new things. 535 - > And that's true of our genome, that's true of us in societies, 536 - > is we're doing this little steps to test out new inno- and then 537 - > they become waves of innovation when lots more people do them. 538 - > And so when you get a really big shift in behaviors, in 539 - > motivation, in societal context, in a lot of the things that we 540 - > used to think were kinda guaranteed, like why you work 541 - > and, and- when all those things go through really big resets, I 542 - > think you get just a completely new set of motivations, 543 - > characteristics societal constructs, just completely new 544 - > ways of doing things. 545 - > I'd love to talk about this whole AI and human kind of 546 - > capacity value- Yeah piece, because the headlines are so 547 - > mixed. 548 - > Francesca and I are reading the headlines every week. 549 - > It's like people are getting 20% to 30% more efficiency, and then 550 - > the next week it's, no, people are doing double the work 551 - > because the agents are toddlers, and they're not y- there yet. 552 - > Yeah. 553 - > And and then, also companies are seeing real value, and then 554 - > actually CFOs haven't seen any ROI from this with their P&L. 555 - > So there's, like, all of these conflicting stories out there. 556 - > Yeah. 557 - > I imagine there's obviously some real wins happening and some 558 - > real losses happening. 559 - > Where do you see this value? 560 - > W- what's the- Yeah story here? 561 - > 'Cause all this mixed messaging around the value happening here. 562 - > All right, so I'm just gonna give you some quick bullet 563 - > points because it's a broad landscape, but I just want to, 564 - > again, help people to see some of the threads that I've seen. 565 - > So the first is there is no such thing as AI. 566 - > Yeah. 567 - > There's no such thing as artificial intelligence. 568 - > It's a marketing label and it's I'm a child of Silicon Valley. 569 - > I spent more than 50 years of my life in Silicon Valley, so I can 570 - > gently criticize my brethren and sistren. 571 - > But it's a marketing label. 572 - > So the more we say an AI coworker, I used an AI today 573 - > nobody says,"Oh, I used the internet today." It just, it 574 - > becomes part of the woodwork. 575 - > And so we're at this inflection point where it benefits tech 576 - > companies a lot for us to keep on using these labels and to 577 - > make it sound like these are some of the most incredible 578 - > tools that have ever been on the planet. 579 - > In many ways, they are some of the most incredible tools that 580 - > have ever been on the planet, but they are flawed. 581 - > They've got deep flaws. 582 - > They can do incredible things, but they also can do incredibly 583 - > stupid things and in- ineffective things. 584 - > So here are some of the things that happen inevitably, is first 585 - > off, CEOs love this stuff because it gives them back a 586 - > couple hours in a day to automate a whole bunch of stuff 587 - > that they thought they had to do themselves. 588 - > And so they then think,"Oh great. 589 - > Everybody can get the same benefits." And it doesn't work 590 - > like that. 591 - > It turns out that there's a lot of different kinds of work that 592 - > it's r- You can use a lot of these tools to automate a lot of 593 - > repetitive tasks, and that is awesome, and you can change 594 - > workflows. 595 - > But people don't change very rapidly. 596 - > They don't have a lot of incentives to change rapidly, 597 - > especially if the company isn't telling them why they're 598 - > training this software. 599 - > Is it to replace? 600 - > Are you really, or is it to make me more productive? 601 - > So what you find is that there's some use cases where it's very - 602 - > it's automatically really useful. 603 - > Call support. 604 - > So when you call nowadays for any kind of support, the tools 605 - > are gonna likely be answering more and more, and it just 606 - > allows humans to be able to do the more complicated stuff. 607 - > But it also means you often need fewer humans on call desks. 608 - > So that's - There's a couple different applications, but then 609 - > there's a variety of uses, such as with programmers, where good 610 - > news, you can knock out a ton more code than you did before. 611 - > Bad news, you didn't do it. 612 - > You have no idea what's in that code, and you have to go bug 613 - > hunt it, search through a lot more, and you might be spending 614 - > more time- doing the bug hunts than you did before because you 615 - > didn't write the code. 616 - > So it's this sort of technology giveth and technology taketh 617 - > away, and we've seen this in wave after wave of technology. 618 - > And what ends up happening then is several things. 619 - > There's some people get tremendous advantages very 620 - > quickly and they get - And especially startups, you're 621 - > gonna find just are gonna have fewer people. 622 - > That's just gonna happen because they can automate a lot of 623 - > stuff. 624 - > Whether it's really good or not, they're still gonna automate a 625 - > lot of stuff with the tools. 626 - > Bigger companies, they're gonna find some parts of the companies 627 - > that can really leverage the tools really well. 628 - > But again, people change fairly slowly. 629 - > The tools have some flaws. 630 - > There's... 631 - > You can make a lot of mistakes with them, such as opening up 632 - > the, your company's private information to the world. 633 - > So you've gotta actually have a bunch of controls. 634 - > You have to have governance around these things, and that 635 - > slows stuff down. 636 - > So what I urge people to do is don't read the headlines. 637 - > Any article that begins with either,"I asked ChatGPT..." or, 638 - > "Sam Altman says..." Don't read those articles. 639 - > Yeah. 640 - > Just don't read those articles because it's gonna be something 641 - > that's gonna trigger you if you're worried that the 642 - > technology is gonna have, is gonna suddenly be able to do 643 - > everything a human can or we won't need humans at all. 644 - > Don't read those. 645 - > Instead, look for the articles that talk about where people 646 - > have been able to use the technologies to do really 647 - > amazing things in something that you care about, that you're 648 - > fascinated by. 649 - > Those are the ones that you should be looking at because 650 - > that's where you're gonna be able to create value. 651 - > And that's - And for young people especially, I'm not 652 - > telling you have to go become an expert in the tools. 653 - > As a matter of fact, I'm not telling you have to use the 654 - > tools. 655 - > What you're gonna find is that there are going to be certain 656 - > kinds of work roles where people are using the tools a lot and 657 - > then you're gonna be encouraged to be able to use those tools 658 - > yourself because you'll be able to do as much work as others 659 - > can. 660 - > A-a-again, only in specific jobs. 661 - > Yeah. 662 - > I'd love to actually - So we are not anti-technology at all here. 663 - > I think we're more- Yeah cautious adopters of what are 664 - > the things to think through. 665 - > And just to your good point where do you see this actually 666 - > elevating human work right now? 667 - > There's just so many great arenas. 668 - > And a lot of it just depends upon sort of the sniff test or 669 - > the bar you're setting. 670 - > Yeah. 671 - > So if we could wave a magic wand and every human on the planet 672 - > had access to tools or to, to the kinds of advice and 673 - > capabilities that allowed them to be able to find or create 674 - > meaningful, well-paid work, that allowed them to have great 675 - > medical advice, that allowed them to be able to get input on 676 - > how to parent better, that allowed them to become better 677 - > teachers, better - if everybody in the world had access to all 678 - > of the kinds of tools we would like to make sure and access to 679 - > the work itself that we would like to make sure everybody's 680 - > able to use then great. 681 - > We don't need as many of the tools because if you have people 682 - > helping you to do that would be awesome. 683 - > That's not the way it works. 684 - > There's tons of populations that do not have good access to 685 - > medical advice, that do not have good access to, to learning. 686 - > And so there's tons of great examples where people have been 687 - > able to use the tools to do something that they just 688 - > literally could not have done before or that helped them to be 689 - > able to do something, achieve something they wanted, start new 690 - > businesses, learn new skills, connect with people that they 691 - > would never have connected with otherwise be able to do things 692 - > that used to take them hours to do and now they can do in 693 - > minutes that allow them to do other really cool things. 694 - > There's tons of great use cases. 695 - > Unfortunately, in the yin and yang of any technology, there's 696 - > a lot of cases where the technologies can be used for 697 - > ill, where they can be used to hack your brain, where they can 698 - > be used to to violate cybersecurity. 699 - > There's all sorts of negative things that the tools can do 700 - > already. 701 - > And because a lot of the tech companies don't take 702 - > responsibility for trying to mitigate against those ills oh, 703 - > I don't know, social media- it's just a little - it's a lot more 704 - > easy for people to do bad things with the software. 705 - > So here's what we need. 706 - > We need people to be good consumers of the software, use 707 - > tools because they've researched the companies and they know 708 - > who's trying to do this all with benefits to society. 709 - > And you - we really do need to be able to especially help 710 - > parents to navigate the decisions about when kids have 711 - > access to these tools and when they don't because there's a lot 712 - > of other societal negatives such as cognitive offload, having the 713 - > technology make a lot of decisions for you that will have 714 - > some really negative consequences downstream if we're 715 - > not helping especially younger kids to be able to understand 716 - > when technologies are most useful and when they're not 717 - > Yeah. 718 - > I recently saw the latest report on the top uses for AI in 719 - > everyday life, and one of the things that really struck me 720 - > were the outsourcing your thinking piece, which I've seen 721 - > in real time with some younger folks I work with, where I'll 722 - > ask a question- Huh and they'll ask ChatGPT while we're in the 723 - > conversation, and I'm like, "Okay, what do you think before 724 - > you get that answer back, I wanna hear what you think 725 - > first." Yeah. 726 - > Which is interesting. 727 - > And the other was around therapy, which I'm torn on, just 728 - > because in terms of mental health systems in this country, 729 - > there's an access problem. 730 - > And so this is an area where it's really challenging because 731 - > you have those populations without access, like you were 732 - > saying. 733 - > That's a great way to elevate access to people who don't have 734 - > it. 735 - > But it's also now we're potentially outsourcing 736 - > community for people through- Yeah'cause they're going to 737 - > their tech first versus an actual human. 738 - > So we thought COVID was bad when people came out of COVID with 739 - > social skills. 740 - > Yeah. 741 - > So what does the social fabric look like in five years if that 742 - > continues? 743 - > That's top of mind for me. 744 - > What I try to urge people to be thinking about in their own 745 - > lives personally, just for each of us as individuals- is what is 746 - > the level of social cohesion in our lives? 747 - > Yeah. 748 - > How many friends do you - are you active with? 749 - > How many people do you talk to on a regular basis? 750 - > How much do you get out interacting directly with 751 - > humans? 752 - > I would be classified as an introvert, and I know I need to 753 - > work a little harder to go out and do those things. 754 - > And I'm lucky because I get invited to do, lots of talks and 755 - > consulting around the world. 756 - > So that kind of pulls me to do those things. 757 - > But in the age of AI, we have to do more. 758 - > We have to first focus in our own lives how much social 759 - > cohesion we have, and we have to understand that a lot of the 760 - > ways we used to have social interactions in the past, the 761 - > technology can insulate us from. 762 - > We've got - in the US, we have, deep trends towards having fewer 763 - > kids towards less membership in institutions like churches, 764 - > towards less in-person interactions lot of online 765 - > learning. 766 - > And each time we do that, it's really important to think of 767 - > this as a balance in our lives. 768 - > Because with more social cohesion, with more interaction 769 - > with humans, especially in the communities like where we live, 770 - > then the greater society, the greater strength societies have. 771 - > And the more we are individuals and we are less involved in 772 - > interacting with others, and the more we use the tools, 773 - > especially to interpolate our interactions with others or to 774 - > make decisions related to others, then that, that reduces 775 - > social cohesion. 776 - > And so that's just the picture I want people to have is, look, we 777 - > want - we all want countries, societies where we've got these 778 - > strong connections to each other. 779 - > And then in our own lives, just look, we have to look at how 780 - > much time are we spending on that screen? 781 - > And maybe just a little less and, but not just less screen 782 - > time. 783 - > That's what I tell parents all the time. 784 - > It's not about telling the kid less screen time. 785 - > It's I want you to do more going out and being hopefully a 786 - > free-range kid or at least, interacting with others and 787 - > playing games with others and that sort of thing. 788 - > So and you, so you get hooked- Yeah on how fun that is. 789 - > And it's the same thing for adults. 790 - > Yeah. 791 - > Yeah. 792 - > Just getting outside and touching grass as we like to 793 - > say. 794 - > Yeah. 795 - > Or, or- What about- Or humans, yeah. 796 - > Yeah. 797 - > Just be a human. 798 - > Inappropriate, only inappropriate ways. 799 - > Yeah think about this a lot because my son plays soccer, and 800 - > he has a coach that's from Brazil. 801 - > And when you look at soccer and you look at the, how different 802 - > countries play and their ethos towards soccer, right? 803 - > Now Brazilians are so good because they just... 804 - > It's not organized play, it's just organic play. 805 - > They go out and they play all the time. 806 - > They're playing in the backyard, they're playing in parking lots, 807 - > and it becomes like a musical composition where the United 808 - > States it's all organized play and it's about strength and what 809 - > I'm finding is there's this very interesting movement, especially 810 - > in high school on down of it's organized, but it's encouraging 811 - > people to get into organized free play. 812 - > Yeah. 813 - > I'm seeing huge upticks in things like run clubs, dance 814 - > clubs cell phone-less schools. 815 - > A lot of... 816 - > I, my son has structured soccer practice, but he also has two 817 - > unstructured soccer practices, which is just, there's no 818 - > coaching, it's just go. 819 - > And so I think people are starting to understand the value 820 - > of that unstructuredness and learning just the joy of play or 821 - > the joy of being together, the joy of being human. 822 - > I feel like I'm seeing that rise a lot, and there's something 823 - > that's really magical about it. 824 - > I don't think you can substitute anything in the flesh in real 825 - > life. 826 - > I don't, and I don't know exactly what that magic is. 827 - > I like to think it's a little woo. 828 - > But I am also feeling like we're starting to see some rise in 829 - > that as well. 830 - > I certainly hope so. 831 - > So I just finished a lecture tour in Brazil. 832 - > Oh, hi. 833 - > All right. 834 - > There you go. 835 - > This is my fifth time flying into São Paulo in just the past 836 - > year. 837 - > Okay. 838 - > So I'm a very big fan of the culture. 839 - > And so here are some of the things that are just wonderful 840 - > to have. 841 - > It's wonderful to have multi-generational families- 842 - > living under the same roof. 843 - > Not everybody can do that. 844 - > It's wonderful to have some kind of play activities that you're 845 - > encouraged to do from very young. 846 - > Brazil has, is one a- one approach. 847 - > The educa- the the learning system in Finland the s- schools 848 - > all are play-based for the first three to four years that a kid 849 - > goes to school. 850 - > So the more we're helping kids to be kids early on, and 851 - > learning the skills of interacting with each other, 852 - > not... 853 - > We don't always get along with each other. 854 - > I know that's, for the parent of a seven-year-old that's probably 855 - > a new memo. 856 - > But we d- we have these frictions with humans get in 857 - > interacting with each other, and we're to learn. 858 - > Yeah. 859 - > And that's what all that social emotional learning stuff is 860 - > about. 861 - > What I would hope then is, yes, more and more because we thrive 862 - > on social signals. 863 - > We thrive on recognition, we thrive on conne- authentic 864 - > connection with other people, and we have to also thrive where 865 - > there are frictions. 866 - > We have to - The more we can make those heterogeneous 867 - > gatherings, not just homogenous ones where everybody looks like 868 - > me, but they it's comes from different perspectives or 869 - > different backgrounds and then that's what we want as societies 870 - > because we really want that kind of interaction, and then we want 871 - > to always over-index on what connects us. 872 - > Yeah. 873 - > That's very fair. 874 - > Yeah. 875 - > I wanna flip to like what that means in an organization you've 876 - > talked about moving from rigid hierarchies more towards access 877 - > to talent, and I'm curious about what that actually looks like in 878 - > practice. 879 - > So there's a couple of things that if we could wave a magic 880 - > wand and we could have organizations be very 881 - > human-centric. 882 - > That is to structure work and the interactions between people 883 - > in work in ways that really work for the majority of humans, is 884 - > there's a couple of things that you would want. 885 - > And there's organizations all around the world that are doing 886 - > different parts of this playbook. 887 - > So first thing is that the organization's heavily indexed 888 - > on what I call a degree of membership. 889 - > So how much of a connection do people feel to the purpose of 890 - > the organization, what they're doing, to each other? 891 - > And so that degree of membership is you might feel 1% membership 892 - > with your organization, which means you're just about ready to 893 - > walk out the door. 894 - > You might feel 100%, 110%, I'm all in. 895 - > This is where I need to be. 896 - > And what we need is the mindset within organizations that we 897 - > want to try to increase this. 898 - > Second is that depending upon whose statistics you look at, 899 - > either the number one or number two reason that people leave 900 - > jobs is because of their... 901 - > I don't use the word manager or supervisor. 902 - > I call that a team guide, but the person who leads your team. 903 - > Yeah. 904 - > And if there's frictions there and it's not great then that's a 905 - > really high reason for you to be looking for new work. 906 - > So the organizations that heavily index on the training 907 - > for that person to help them to know how to lead and to helping 908 - > people within a team to know how to lead as well, all the, that 909 - > investment is really important, or else you don't get a flexible 910 - > organization because then you s- people stay locked in a 911 - > hierarchy. 912 - > Third, you have to have this mindset that you're trying to 913 - > help people develop as humans. 914 - > And so how do they know their own skills? 915 - > How do they know what they're good at, what they love doing, 916 - > kinds of problems they like to solve? 917 - > And then how can you continually try to make the kind of 918 - > framework inside the organization so they can be 919 - > doing that kind of work? 920 - > So that, what ends up happening then is some organizations 921 - > become what are called increasingly skills-based 922 - > organizations, so they know they've got databases to 923 - > understand people's skills. 924 - > They often put in project marketplaces- Yeah so that when 925 - > a person who leads a team needs somebody, they can find the 926 - > skills in- inside the organization or outside the 927 - > organization. 928 - > ChatGPT just announced a a, OpenAI just announced a 929 - > partnership with Upwork the gig work platform, where you can 930 - > literally go into ChatGPT and describe a project And then the 931 - > software will look on Upwork's database and give you the team 932 - > of tomorrow, like the perfect skill set for something. 933 - > So now think of that in every organization. 934 - > And think of the same thing from the ind- individual side, where 935 - > they would be able to see those opportunities, especially in 936 - > larger organizations. 937 - > That's what the future may hold, is that more organizations 938 - > become more fluid like that, and they become... 939 - > They - What they need is a flow of human talent, people that can 940 - > continually solve new problems. 941 - > And what individuals need is to continually have optionality, is 942 - > to understand more about their own skills and then be able to 943 - > solve the kinds of problems that they most like to. 944 - > And and so a lot of organizations already are 945 - > starting to experiment with these types of things. 946 - > And the opportunity is to create more flexible organizations 947 - > where you just are able to continually bring in, especially 948 - > young people. 949 - > We need to make sure that this really works for young people 950 - > through apprenticeships and mentorships. 951 - > But where they're able to do more project-based work, and 952 - > they're able to be focusing on generating output so they can 953 - > point to the things that they've accomplished and developing new 954 - > skills as rapidly as possible. 955 - > Who do you think is doing this really well? 956 - > Because I've been in this space for my entire career. 957 - > We've been talking about things like job marketplaces since 958 - > 2019. 959 - > Yeah. 960 - > The needing manager development and having great managers and 961 - > coaches is something every organization is always working 962 - > on, and I'm curious about who you think is doing this really 963 - > well. 964 - > Yeah. 965 - > So there's a couple facets to it, and I'll just point to some 966 - > of the different kinds of structures. 967 - > So as I think I was saying, so that you've got this business 968 - > model that sort of defines what the organization does, and the 969 - > operating model is: how do you organize humans? 970 - > How do you leverage technology? 971 - > Yeah. 972 - > How do you leverage the assets of the organization? 973 - > And there... 974 - > So when it comes to focusing on being a learning culture and 975 - > changing the role of the traditional manager, I'd have to 976 - > point to Novartis the pharma company, and I think it's 80,000 977 - > employees now. 978 - > And they have two practices that I always point to. 979 - > The first is they strongly encourage everybody throughout 980 - > the organization to talk about the latest course that they 981 - > took. 982 - > It's all about what are you learning. 983 - > And then once a year, they have what's called Curiosity Month, 984 - > and they teach courses to each other. 985 - > Might be in cooking, might be in something related to chemistry. 986 - > But it's - the whole idea is to build this fabric of connection 987 - > between people and to learn from each other. 988 - > And then they also have a practice called unbossing. 989 - > And even senior managers within the organization, when they walk 990 - > into a meeting, they often will begin by saying: How can we 991 - > unboss this meeting? 992 - > And what that means is, how can I not be the person who comes up 993 - > with all the decisions? 994 - > You come up with the decisions. 995 - > You solve the problems, and then I'm here to support you. 996 - > I'm here to find you the resources. 997 - > I'm here to remove roadblocks if you need other parts of the 998 - > organization to help you. 999 - > But you have to change the calculus by which humans are 1000 - > working together and embrace this much more flexible 1001 - > approach. 1002 - > And then the mindset that is behind more project-based work 1003 - > is is typically to think of the ev- every skill within the 1004 - > organization as being an enterprise resource. 1005 - > Companies like Google actually don't hire in certain work 1006 - > roles, a specific, for a specific job. 1007 - > So if you're hired as a programmer at Google, for 1008 - > instance, you go through the same training program that every 1009 - > other programmer goes through. 1010 - > And whether you went to a code camp or Carnegie Mellon, you're 1011 - > gonna go through the same training. 1012 - > And then when you come out of that, you date around. 1013 - > You go to different groups to find the c- where the 1014 - > connections are. 1015 - > And and it's a, that is a mutual decision. 1016 - > Do I think it's, it is, it's very much like dating. 1017 - > Do you, do I think you're a good match? 1018 - > Do you think I'm a good match? 1019 - > And so you think of these as practices that can be done at 1020 - > scale inside organizations, it's harder because you've got to 1021 - > train that team guide. 1022 - > You've got to train the former manager or supervisor to deal 1023 - > with ambiguity, to be able to understand that they've got to 1024 - > continually be developing skill sets, to be thinking more like a 1025 - > coach than somebody who is in command and control. 1026 - > And so that's a, that's an investment. 1027 - > Yeah but I'm encouraged to see more organizations that are s- 1028 - > starting to embrace more of this mindset. 1029 - > For sure. 1030 - > Awesome. 1031 - > Thank you. 1032 - > Thank you. 1033 - > I only have two questions for you. 1034 - > Okay. 1035 - > What responsibility, Francesca and I are constantly talking 1036 - > about this with the changes that are coming about with AI 1037 - > layoffs, and we see them k- you know- Yeah when we think about 1038 - > the responsibility organizations have in society right now. 1039 - > What responsibility- Yeah do you think companies have right now 1040 - > in this moment? 1041 - > So first off, again, just the AI layoffs it's very difficult to 1042 - > tease this out of the market data because it's a lot of tech 1043 - > companies are the ones that are citing the use of the tools, but 1044 - > they're also marketing tools to - that kind of sounds more 1045 - > like layoffs are marketing. 1046 - > Is that how it works? 1047 - > Buy my products'cause it'll save money? 1048 - > So it's hard to tease out of the data. 1049 - > What you do find is more of this sort of initial baselining of 1050 - > companies decided they don't need as many young people, or 1051 - > they don't need as many people in entry-level work because they 1052 - > feel like they can replicate a lot of the work with the tools. 1053 - > So when you say responsibility I would say organizations that are 1054 - > very shareholder-driven, the understandable pressure that a 1055 - > CEO feels is to reduce headcount. 1056 - > And what I urge people who lead in, especially large 1057 - > organizations, but any shareholder-driven company, it 1058 - > takes courage to say,"Look, what has happened over and over again 1059 - > is companies have gotten these new technologies, they laid off 1060 - > a whole bunch of people, everybody, including their 1061 - > competitors, has access to all the same technologies, and 1062 - > within three or four years, everybody's got access to the 1063 - > internet, everybody's got web servers, everybody, all wave 1064 - > after wave of te- everybody's got cloud computing, and then 1065 - > now everybody's got the AI tool set." You are going to regret 1066 - > that you got rid of some people who really understood your 1067 - > customers or really understood the processes in your 1068 - > organization, and now the tools give this baseline, lifts all 1069 - > boats. 1070 - > And so that's what I encourage from a responsibility 1071 - > standpoint. 1072 - > Say, look, it takes courage to go back to your board, to go 1073 - > back to your shareholders and say,"Look, we are making this 1074 - > investment because we know we can be more competitive, or we 1075 - > know that we can provide more value to our customers, and we 1076 - > are going to dedicate ourselves to doing that in the most 1077 - > effective way we possibly can." What are you most hopeful for? 1078 - > I call myself a cautious optimist. 1079 - > So I've been accused of believing that people will 1080 - > continue to make human-centric decisions. 1081 - > But one of the reasons that I end my book"The Next Rules of 1082 - > Work," the final line in it is, "No human left behind." And the 1083 - > reason I end that way is I want people to understand that we all 1084 - > make decisions, and we're making decisions that we often don't 1085 - > think have ripple effects in society, but they do. 1086 - > They do. 1087 - > We're very responsible. 1088 - > And and so the more that I see examples of people all around 1089 - > the world who are saying wait a minute. 1090 - > No, we actually can make better, more human-centric dec- 1091 - > decisions. 1092 - > We actually can give people the tool set so they can solve new 1093 - > problems and create new value." I'm just encouraged by more and 1094 - > more of those stories and signs. 1095 - > And then I'm also encouraged because I'm starting to see 1096 - > educational institutions that are starting to get the memo, 1097 - > that this is a time and opportunity to be able to 1098 - > jettison those industrial era processes, and instead to 1099 - > empower lifelong learning and lifelong work with this unique 1100 - > tool set, but continually by reinforcing interactions with 1101 - > humans. 1102 - > And I see there's plenty of great examples around the world 1103 - > where educational institutions are transforming themselves as 1104 - > well. 1105 - > Awesome. 1106 - > Thank you. 1107 - > I appreciate you, Gary. 1108 - > All right. 1109 - > Always great to talk to you two. 1110 - >

Speaker 6: Thanks for joining us today. 1111 - > Music was by Pink Zebra. 1112 - > This episode was produced, recorded, and edited by yours 1113 - > truly, Francesca and I of"Your Work Friends." And we're an 1114 - > indie pod, folks. 1115 - > We drop new episodes each week on Tuesday, so please 1116 - >

Speaker 7: come back to check them out. 1117 - > Subscribe on the platform of your choice, and if you want one 1118 - > big meaty insight about work every single month, subscribe to 1119 - > our newsletter on yourworkfriends.com. 1120 - > Bye, friends. 1121 - >

Speaker 6: Bye, 1122 - >

Speaker 7: friends.

Related episodes across the Index

Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.

  • Decoding AQ with Ross Thornley Feat. Gary Bolles - Transformation & The Future of WorkDECODING AQ · features Gary Bolles80 / 100
  • AI Can Move Trillions. You Won’t Let It Send an Email.AI Proving Ground Podcast · on Singularity University81 / 100
  • Inside Fabletics: How L&D is Preparing for an AI-First Future with Will FengThe LeaderLab: Powered by LifeLabs Learning · on LinkedIn Learning80 / 100
  • 651. Chad Oakley, Current State of the Consulting Market in 2026Unleashed · on AI adoption and implementation78 / 100
  • #122 The SDR DiscoCall Podcast - Henry ClaytonThe SDR DiscoCall Podcast · on LinkedIn Learning70 / 100
  • Purpose-Driven Careers in the Age of AIThe Future of Work · on Singularity University68 / 100

More from Your Work Friends

All episodes →
  • The Work Friendship Advantage w/ KPMG's Sandy Torchia46 / 100
  • Modern Work: Monitored, Misled, and Laid Off80 / 100
  • What the Hell is Going on with Work Right Now? w/ HR Brew's Adam DeRose and People Managing People's David Rice87 / 100
  • From Cigarettes to Smoke-Free: What Real Transformation Actually Takes w/ Philip Morris International's Dr. Kaleen Love85 / 100
  • AI: Magic or Miss? Potential. Cheap Labor. Productivity Mirage. Brain Fry.74 / 100
Explore the best B2B Leadership podcasts →
All Your Work Friends episodes →