57 Imposter Syndrome Is a Fallacy: Dr. Nicole Pulliam on Equity in Leadership
Joyfully Unstoppable | Executive leadership for women · 2026-06-16 · 37 min
Substance score
46 / 100
Five dimensions, 20 points each
What our scoring noted
Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.
Insight Density
The episode delivers one substantive reframe—imposter syndrome as externally imposed 'imposterization' rather than an individual defect—with some historical grounding, but large stretches are occupied by rapport-building, a meandering gardening analogy, and host monologues that severely dilute insight per minute for a B2B operator audience.
Imposterization is about taking a look at the systems, the people that make up the systems, um, and how the policies, the practices, the cultures that are built within institutions
equity-centered leadership is a fiduciary responsibility
Originality
The etymology reframe—backed by a direct conversation with the original researcher who herself objected to the 'syndrome' label—is a genuinely interesting and uncommon angle; however, the broader thesis that systemic conditions rather than individual deficits cause self-doubt is well-established in DEI discourse and not particularly contrarian.
she said,'When you write this up in whatever journals you're going to seek publication in, please do not call it imposter syndrome, because we never called it that, and that term is problematic because it places the blame on us.'
if it's so easy to undo was that really the work or was it a performative measure?
Guest Caliber
Dr. Pulliam holds credible practitioner-researcher credentials—a grant-funded study, direct contact with original imposter phenomenon researchers, and 20-plus years of institutional leadership—but her domain is higher education and DEI coaching rather than scaled B2B operations, limiting direct transferability for the target operator audience.
I wind up- Um, getting a grant to do this really cool study in twenty nineteen, twenty twenty
I had a chance to speak with Dr. Pauline Clance, um, because I, I needed her permission to use this imposter phenomenon scale for my study
Specificity & Evidence
The episode names specific researchers (Clance, Imes, Lobins), a grant-funded study, a 2019-2020 timeframe, and references student GPA data, but there are no dollar figures, retention metrics, named organizations, or outcome data that would give a B2B operator concrete benchmarks to act on.
my students were, you know, 3.5 and above GPAs, you would think. And to the university, they retained them, they graduated them.
we saw Lots of diversity statements being created and plastered all over websites, and we saw divisions and departments and people hired into these equity, diversity, whatever you wanna call it, roles, many of which tended to be people of color
Conversational Craft
The host lands one substantive conceptual challenge—pushing back on fairness versus performance as frames for equity—but frequently displaces guest airtime with extended personal monologues and affirmations, and the closing 'one message' question is the weakest type of podcast closer with no follow-up pressure.
if I can be frank, the, the marketing that is out there in support of women, either in leadership roles or just in general, it is that pain-point marketing and focus on what's wrong and what's broken
fundamentally equity was about fairness, my initial thought was, well, I don't, didn't think about equity that way. I think equity is about outcomes and performance
Conversation analysis
Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the verbal tics along the way.
Filler words
Episode notes
Send us Fan Mail Imposter Syndrome Is a Fallacy: Dr. Nicole Pulliam on Equity in Leadership | Joyfully Unstoppable Host Becky Hamm welcomes Dr. Nicole Pulliam, tenured professor, TEDx speaker, executive coach, and founder of Real and Worthy LLC, to discuss her counter-narrative that women’s leadership self-doubt isn’t a personal flaw but a product of systems not designed for them. Dr. Pulliam explains why the term “imposter syndrome” is problematic, tracing it back to the original “imposter phenomenon” research and highlighting “imposterization,” which focuses on how institutional cultures, policies, and practices create imposter feelings. She connects this to equity-centered leadership, arguing equity is foundational to healthy, high-performing organizations. Dr. Pulliam offers practical ways to engage equity conversations by asking who was included in decisions and what may be missing, and emphasizes facing hard truths as the only path to sustainable wellness and joy. 00:00 Welcome to the Podcast 00:36 Meet Dr.
Full transcript
37 minTranscribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.
1 00:00:06,073 --> 00:00:08,192 Rebecca Hamm: Welcome to Joyfully Unstoppable, the 2 00:00:08,192 --> 00:00:12,012 podcast for women who are ready to succeed without the stress. 3 00:00:12,462 --> 00:00:16,643 Whether you're leading a team, a classroom, a boardroom, or your 4 00:00:16,681 --> 00:00:21,071 own big, beautiful life, I am so glad you found us. 5 00:00:21,443 --> 00:00:24,893 I'm your host, Becky Hamm, executive coach, speaker, and 6 00:00:24,893 --> 00:00:26,553 founder of Women Lead Well. 7 00:00:27,332 --> 00:00:31,103 me each week for straight talk, practical tips, and a dash of 8 00:00:31,103 --> 00:00:32,073 encouragement. 9 00:00:32,853 --> 00:00:33,713 Hello, friend. 10 00:00:33,722 --> 00:00:36,162 I hope you are having a great day. 11 00:00:36,281 --> 00:00:41,143 Today, am, and I am so excited to welcome Dr. 12 00:00:41,143 --> 00:00:43,393 Nicole Pulliam on the podcast. 13 00:00:43,732 --> 00:00:44,012 Dr. 14 00:00:44,012 --> 00:00:48,682 Pulliam is a tenured graduate level professor, a TEDx speaker, 15 00:00:48,872 --> 00:00:52,542 an executive coach, and the founder and CEO of Real and 16 00:00:52,542 --> 00:00:53,813 Worthy LLC. 17 00:00:54,192 --> 00:00:57,031 With more than 20 years in higher education, spanning 18 00:00:57,031 --> 00:01:00,093 student affairs, academic affairs, and institutional 19 00:01:00,093 --> 00:01:03,593 leadership, she is a sought-after strategic partner 20 00:01:03,612 --> 00:01:07,822 for mid to senior level leaders, faculty, and institutions who 21 00:01:07,822 --> 00:01:09,623 are ready to do the real work. 22 00:01:10,332 --> 00:01:14,623 approach is identity affirming, strength-based, and grounded in 23 00:01:14,623 --> 00:01:19,552 one belief: equity isn't an initiative, it's the foundation 24 00:01:19,582 --> 00:01:22,283 of effective, sustainable leadership. 25 00:01:23,343 --> 00:01:26,322 Pulliam, thank you so much for coming on the Joyfully 26 00:01:26,322 --> 00:01:27,683 Unstoppable podcast. 27 00:01:28,317 --> 00:01:29,388 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Thank you so much. 28 00:01:29,418 --> 00:01:33,507 I'm so excited to be here with you, and before we started 29 00:01:33,507 --> 00:01:36,567 recording, we just mentioned we just met, what, this past 30 00:01:36,567 --> 00:01:37,947 February at, 31 00:01:38,222 --> 00:01:38,513 Rebecca Hamm: That's 32 00:01:38,638 --> 00:01:40,567 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: a conference in DC where I had a 33 00:01:40,567 --> 00:01:43,308 chan- chance to participate in your workshop. 34 00:01:43,347 --> 00:01:47,347 And lo and behold, I'm also a coach, and th- this is how these 35 00:01:47,358 --> 00:01:47,897 things go. 36 00:01:47,977 --> 00:01:48,968 We build community. 37 00:01:48,987 --> 00:01:53,528 So I'm so happy to be here with you, um, and to talk to your 38 00:01:53,528 --> 00:01:54,317 audience today 39 00:01:54,638 --> 00:01:54,959 Rebecca Hamm: Yeah. 40 00:01:54,959 --> 00:01:58,539 Well, Nicole, I tell you, your workshop in February was 41 00:01:58,759 --> 00:01:59,549 phenomenal. 42 00:01:59,549 --> 00:02:03,498 I got so much value out of it, and I knew I wanted you to talk, 43 00:02:03,828 --> 00:02:07,558 uh, to my audience, but timing is everything, and I know you 44 00:02:07,558 --> 00:02:10,639 are a busy woman with a lot of leadership responsibilities. 45 00:02:11,448 --> 00:02:15,388 I don't know about you, summer has not calmed down for me much, 46 00:02:15,578 --> 00:02:18,448 but I'm so grateful that you've made the time today for us to 47 00:02:18,448 --> 00:02:18,918 talk. 48 00:02:19,348 --> 00:02:21,608 And- Thank you I wanna just get into it. 49 00:02:21,609 --> 00:02:23,838 Let's just jump in the deep end of the pool. 50 00:02:24,258 --> 00:02:27,979 You say that your work is built on a counter-narrative, that the 51 00:02:27,979 --> 00:02:32,118 self-doubt that women feel in leadership isn't a character 52 00:02:32,118 --> 00:02:32,588 flaw. 53 00:02:33,429 --> 00:02:36,868 what happens when you lead in a system that was never designed 54 00:02:36,908 --> 00:02:38,288 with women in mind. 55 00:02:38,868 --> 00:02:41,109 Can you tell the listeners what you mean by that? 56 00:02:41,188 --> 00:02:44,229 How, how does the system prompt self-doubt? 57 00:02:45,250 --> 00:02:45,379 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Yes. 58 00:02:46,030 --> 00:02:49,669 So I love that this is the first question because, you know, when 59 00:02:49,669 --> 00:02:55,189 I look back on my twenty-plus career in higher ed, um, you 60 00:02:55,189 --> 00:02:57,939 know, on, again, the student affairs side, the academic 61 00:02:57,939 --> 00:03:01,280 affairs side, my coaching role, and all of the roles, and just 62 00:03:01,280 --> 00:03:04,789 sort of navigating life as a woman, but also, and I'll get 63 00:03:04,789 --> 00:03:07,650 into, you know, for me, navigating the world and my 64 00:03:07,650 --> 00:03:13,729 career as a woman of color, um, what I've learned over the years 65 00:03:14,310 --> 00:03:19,969 is that this whole idea that we call imposter syndrome, and I'm 66 00:03:19,979 --> 00:03:25,050 putting that in quotes for a reason, is actually a fallacy. 67 00:03:25,646 --> 00:03:25,657 Rebecca Hamm: Hmm. 68 00:03:26,400 --> 00:03:30,560 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: because the idea of imposter syndrome, 69 00:03:30,560 --> 00:03:33,900 and if we really pick that apart, the problem with that 70 00:03:33,900 --> 00:03:38,139 narrative is that there is something that is wrong with us, 71 00:03:39,000 --> 00:03:39,439 right? 72 00:03:39,439 --> 00:03:43,330 We start to look within ourselves because the feelings 73 00:03:43,389 --> 00:03:48,319 that exist when women say,"I feel like an imposter, I'm 74 00:03:48,319 --> 00:03:51,919 experiencing imposter syndrome," those feelings are real. 75 00:03:52,319 --> 00:03:57,639 However, where the imposter syndrome narrative, the dominant 76 00:03:57,699 --> 00:04:01,379 narrative currently, especially for women, and then you add 77 00:04:01,409 --> 00:04:06,240 other racial and ethnic identities onto that, is that no 78 00:04:06,240 --> 00:04:11,849 one is talking about the ways that the systems in which we're 79 00:04:11,900 --> 00:04:16,139 operating are actually perpetuating or adding or, in 80 00:04:16,139 --> 00:04:20,699 many ways, at fault for the very feelings that we are feeling. 81 00:04:21,189 --> 00:04:25,480 So oftentimes, the dominant narrative is, you know,"Let me 82 00:04:25,480 --> 00:04:29,339 go take another workshop," or, "Let me..." Now, I'm not saying 83 00:04:29,339 --> 00:04:32,029 don't go and work with a coach, 'cause coaching is important, 84 00:04:32,269 --> 00:04:35,439 but maybe I need this or maybe I need that. 85 00:04:35,800 --> 00:04:39,550 And what I've found over the years, both from experiencing it 86 00:04:39,560 --> 00:04:42,879 myself, but specifically starting to dig into the 87 00:04:42,879 --> 00:04:46,350 research, right now I'm looking at my calendar, over the past 88 00:04:46,350 --> 00:04:48,329 six years, twenty-twenty... 89 00:04:48,350 --> 00:04:52,180 Twenty-nineteen, actually, I started to dig into this whole 90 00:04:52,199 --> 00:04:56,040 imposter syndrome research because the more conferences I 91 00:04:56,040 --> 00:05:00,730 attended and the more women I spoke with and mentored, and as 92 00:05:00,730 --> 00:05:05,009 I was navigating my own life, I'm like,"Let me-- let's dig 93 00:05:05,009 --> 00:05:05,459 into this. 94 00:05:05,470 --> 00:05:08,959 Like, what is actually happening?" Fast-forward, I wind 95 00:05:08,959 --> 00:05:13,237 up- Um, getting a grant to do this really cool study in twenty 96 00:05:13,237 --> 00:05:14,598 nineteen, twenty twenty. 97 00:05:14,687 --> 00:05:17,387 What else was going on in twenty nineteen, twenty twenty? 98 00:05:17,757 --> 00:05:18,668 The pandemic. 99 00:05:18,848 --> 00:05:22,437 I also had my second baby, so there was a whole lot going on. 100 00:05:22,728 --> 00:05:27,517 But I got my hands on all of the literature that was rooted or 101 00:05:27,517 --> 00:05:31,028 sort of, um, had anything to do with imposter syndrome. 102 00:05:31,108 --> 00:05:35,557 And what I found was that imposter syndrome was 103 00:05:35,557 --> 00:05:36,278 actually... 104 00:05:36,307 --> 00:05:41,177 that term was actually, um, not syndrome when it was first 105 00:05:41,177 --> 00:05:41,617 formed. 106 00:05:41,658 --> 00:05:46,278 It was based on the work of two psychologists back in the late 107 00:05:46,278 --> 00:05:47,348 eighties, Dr. 108 00:05:47,348 --> 00:05:48,908 Pauline Clance and Dr. 109 00:05:48,908 --> 00:05:53,288 Suzanne Imes, who did this really cool study with women, 110 00:05:53,447 --> 00:05:56,987 sort of middle-aged, sort of mid-level professional women. 111 00:05:57,367 --> 00:06:01,278 Um, and they called it the imposter phenomenon, meaning 112 00:06:01,637 --> 00:06:05,668 something's going on with these high-achieving women that no 113 00:06:05,668 --> 00:06:09,947 matter how many degrees and how many accolades and how many 114 00:06:09,947 --> 00:06:13,848 awards, they still felt like they weren't enough. 115 00:06:14,108 --> 00:06:18,627 They still, you know, attributed success to lots of other people. 116 00:06:18,668 --> 00:06:22,437 So I did some research, but I had a-- this really cool 117 00:06:22,437 --> 00:06:25,108 opportunity to speak with Dr. 118 00:06:25,108 --> 00:06:29,538 Pauline Clance, um, because I, I needed her permission to use 119 00:06:29,538 --> 00:06:32,418 this imposter phenomenon scale for my study. 120 00:06:32,968 --> 00:06:36,137 I had no idea how to reach her, but it said in order to use this 121 00:06:36,137 --> 00:06:38,088 scale, you have to get permission. 122 00:06:38,817 --> 00:06:40,867 So she took my phone call. 123 00:06:40,898 --> 00:06:42,588 Um, she was lovely. 124 00:06:42,728 --> 00:06:46,148 Um, she was, you know, uh, older, I believe, you know, 125 00:06:46,158 --> 00:06:47,187 seventies, eighties. 126 00:06:47,187 --> 00:06:50,098 And first of all, she said, "Thank you so much for, for 127 00:06:50,098 --> 00:06:55,627 using my scale." My study was also looking at the imposter 128 00:06:55,627 --> 00:06:58,992 phenomenon with first-generation, Black and 129 00:06:58,992 --> 00:07:01,692 Latinx students, and I'll say a little bit more about that 130 00:07:01,692 --> 00:07:06,973 because all of my work primarily is focused on, um, the first gen 131 00:07:06,973 --> 00:07:08,843 and sort of looking at race and ethnicity. 132 00:07:08,992 --> 00:07:12,862 So she said thank you because her original-- their original 133 00:07:12,862 --> 00:07:15,973 research did not account for race or ethnicity. 134 00:07:16,182 --> 00:07:20,668 They only accounted for gender But the most important thing she 135 00:07:20,668 --> 00:07:24,209 said, which leads me to the counter-narrative work that I've 136 00:07:24,209 --> 00:07:28,959 been doing, is she said,"When you write this up in whatever 137 00:07:28,968 --> 00:07:32,848 journals you're going to seek publication in, please do not 138 00:07:32,848 --> 00:07:37,569 call it imposter syndrome, because we never called it that, 139 00:07:37,759 --> 00:07:42,559 and that term is problematic because it places the blame on 140 00:07:42,869 --> 00:07:47,649 us." And there was something about that statement coming from 141 00:07:47,649 --> 00:07:54,178 the original researcher that really just lit a fire in me to 142 00:07:54,189 --> 00:07:59,098 start doing work and workshops and research and centering my 143 00:07:59,139 --> 00:08:04,478 coaching years later on shifting that narrative and moving away 144 00:08:04,499 --> 00:08:08,178 from the, the, the problem was us, right? 145 00:08:08,519 --> 00:08:13,369 What that means for higher ed or any organization is that we're 146 00:08:13,369 --> 00:08:15,869 looking at this at the systems level. 147 00:08:15,899 --> 00:08:17,399 We're actually looking at... 148 00:08:17,399 --> 00:08:21,209 Now there's some new body of research, um, that looks at 149 00:08:21,278 --> 00:08:25,588 imposterization, not imposter syndrome. 150 00:08:25,869 --> 00:08:32,158 Imposterization is about taking a look at the systems, the 151 00:08:32,158 --> 00:08:37,219 people that make up the systems, um, and how the policies, the 152 00:08:37,229 --> 00:08:42,068 practices, the cultures that are built within institutions, and 153 00:08:42,068 --> 00:08:47,769 not just within higher ed, but all institutions, and how the 154 00:08:47,778 --> 00:08:51,349 cultures, the pract- all of that lead to feelings of 155 00:08:53,078 --> 00:08:54,938 imposterization or imposter feelings. 156 00:08:54,948 --> 00:08:59,109 So it's sort of, I like to call it, and the title of my TED Talk 157 00:08:59,109 --> 00:09:01,749 was actually Remixing The Narrative, right? 158 00:09:01,749 --> 00:09:03,048 We're flipping the script. 159 00:09:03,339 --> 00:09:07,818 So we're still talking about it, but we're reversing the way 160 00:09:07,818 --> 00:09:08,798 we're looking at it. 161 00:09:08,818 --> 00:09:12,979 So the counter-narrative is we're not imposters. 162 00:09:13,428 --> 00:09:17,938 Women, women of color, we are not imposters, which actually 163 00:09:17,938 --> 00:09:22,158 led to me naming my company that I built three years ago, Real 164 00:09:22,158 --> 00:09:24,928 and Worthy, real being we're not imposters. 165 00:09:24,938 --> 00:09:29,908 We are real, and we are worthy of everything we've achieved, 166 00:09:29,979 --> 00:09:31,558 everything we've earned. 167 00:09:31,989 --> 00:09:36,818 Um, so my research and my work has shifted significantly over 168 00:09:36,818 --> 00:09:41,629 the past six years because of this work, because the, the, 169 00:09:41,698 --> 00:09:48,438 the, the more I dig into this, the more problematic I see that 170 00:09:48,438 --> 00:09:49,708 that sort of term is. 171 00:09:49,719 --> 00:09:53,509 So the, the dominant narrative is something's wrong with us. 172 00:09:53,558 --> 00:09:56,028 Women are struggling, and yeah, we are struggling. 173 00:09:57,389 --> 00:10:01,369 However, where we stop is why, 174 00:10:01,832 --> 00:10:02,263 Rebecca Hamm: Yeah. 175 00:10:02,293 --> 00:10:02,363 I 176 00:10:02,509 --> 00:10:02,528 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: And it- 177 00:10:02,562 --> 00:10:04,523 Rebecca Hamm: this is so important 178 00:10:05,009 --> 00:10:05,578 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Yeah 179 00:10:05,743 --> 00:10:07,623 Rebecca Hamm: and I've seen this in the clients that I've 180 00:10:07,653 --> 00:10:08,312 coached, 181 00:10:08,528 --> 00:10:08,538 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Mm-hmm. 182 00:10:08,572 --> 00:10:10,692 Rebecca Hamm: there is this assumption that something is 183 00:10:10,692 --> 00:10:11,552 wrong with me. 184 00:10:11,921 --> 00:10:12,341 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Yep 185 00:10:12,523 --> 00:10:19,043 Rebecca Hamm: if I can be frank, the, the marketing that is out 186 00:10:19,043 --> 00:10:21,993 there in support of women, either in leadership roles or 187 00:10:21,993 --> 00:10:25,602 just in general, it is that pain-point marketing and focus 188 00:10:25,602 --> 00:10:28,842 on what's wrong and what's broken, and you the entrepreneur 189 00:10:28,842 --> 00:10:31,363 brings a solution to the problem, or you're gonna fix 190 00:10:31,363 --> 00:10:31,572 what's 191 00:10:31,664 --> 00:10:31,674 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Mm-hmm. 192 00:10:32,883 --> 00:10:35,793 Rebecca Hamm: And, y- you know, I'm new to the entrepreneur 193 00:10:35,793 --> 00:10:38,462 world, and so I'm not gonna say I never marketed in that way 194 00:10:38,462 --> 00:10:40,133 because I didn't, that's what people told 195 00:10:40,201 --> 00:10:40,671 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: But we're sold 196 00:10:40,702 --> 00:10:43,013 Rebecca Hamm: was f- I was figuring it out, and I, it just 197 00:10:43,033 --> 00:10:44,253 gives me the ick. 198 00:10:44,352 --> 00:10:48,552 And so I have tried to really change the way that I approach 199 00:10:48,552 --> 00:10:51,942 my conversations with women over the past several months, because 200 00:10:52,062 --> 00:10:52,863 there ain't nothing wrong. 201 00:10:52,873 --> 00:10:53,883 You ain't broken. 202 00:10:54,123 --> 00:10:54,913 Nothing is wrong. 203 00:10:54,962 --> 00:10:56,673 We all have those negative thoughts. 204 00:10:56,673 --> 00:10:57,082 We all 205 00:10:57,150 --> 00:10:57,390 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Yeah 206 00:10:57,643 --> 00:11:01,023 Rebecca Hamm: rooms wondering and feeling like maybe we aren't 207 00:11:01,023 --> 00:11:03,783 good enough or we don't belong, and you have given such a 208 00:11:03,793 --> 00:11:07,842 thoughtful contextualization of where those thoughts are 209 00:11:07,842 --> 00:11:12,192 actually coming from, that it is not anything is wrong with any 210 00:11:12,192 --> 00:11:14,883 one woman, that she can't hack it or she's not good enough, 211 00:11:15,184 --> 00:11:15,485 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Yes 212 00:11:15,712 --> 00:11:19,472 Rebecca Hamm: that the systems in place in the organization and 213 00:11:19,633 --> 00:11:24,572 the patterns in place in different organizations create 214 00:11:24,623 --> 00:11:28,602 expectations that just don't fit. 215 00:11:28,692 --> 00:11:32,432 It's a square peg, round hole situation is what I'm hearing. 216 00:11:32,452 --> 00:11:34,633 Is that, is that a fair way to say it? 217 00:11:35,057 --> 00:11:35,506 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Yes. 218 00:11:35,886 --> 00:11:39,456 In, in some ways, you know, the, the, the, the last thing that 219 00:11:39,456 --> 00:11:43,466 I'll say about this in terms of the counter-narrative is, you 220 00:11:43,466 --> 00:11:45,527 know, I can't speak for all industries, right? 221 00:11:45,547 --> 00:11:47,576 Like my background, and I know your background, we have a 222 00:11:47,576 --> 00:11:50,506 shared background in higher education, and higher education 223 00:11:50,527 --> 00:11:51,496 is its own system. 224 00:11:51,908 --> 00:11:52,178 Rebecca Hamm: Mm-hmm. 225 00:11:52,197 --> 00:11:54,336 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: any system, um, and again, we'll 226 00:11:54,336 --> 00:11:57,927 just take a look at higher education, is simply a microcosm 227 00:11:57,956 --> 00:12:02,086 of our society, you know, of, of, of our, the history of our 228 00:12:02,086 --> 00:12:03,206 country, right? 229 00:12:03,216 --> 00:12:10,956 So, you know, we oftentimes in education think that educational 230 00:12:10,976 --> 00:12:17,787 spaces are, um, don't necessarily have the same issues 231 00:12:17,787 --> 00:12:21,777 that are going on in the rest of the world, like all of the isms, 232 00:12:22,206 --> 00:12:22,657 right? 233 00:12:22,756 --> 00:12:23,626 All of them. 234 00:12:23,677 --> 00:12:25,606 Um, and that is just not true. 235 00:12:25,667 --> 00:12:28,167 It is a microcosm of our society. 236 00:12:28,537 --> 00:12:29,096 You know? 237 00:12:29,106 --> 00:12:33,856 So when I think about the, um, counter-narrative, there's 238 00:12:33,856 --> 00:12:37,067 really two ways to think about this, and I think, you know, you 239 00:12:37,067 --> 00:12:42,147 would appreciate this having been in senior level roles, um, 240 00:12:42,187 --> 00:12:46,297 in higher ed, and now being a coach and consultant too, is 241 00:12:46,317 --> 00:12:51,256 that the coaching piece is really about, you know, how do 242 00:12:51,256 --> 00:12:53,976 we help our clients feel... 243 00:12:53,986 --> 00:12:57,106 Like, for me, I'm always like, how do I help my clients feel 244 00:12:57,466 --> 00:13:01,147 and believe that they, that regardless of what's going on 245 00:13:01,226 --> 00:13:06,017 within the system, that they still and will always have power 246 00:13:06,027 --> 00:13:09,346 and agency over their lives, right? 247 00:13:09,427 --> 00:13:11,246 So that's the coaching component. 248 00:13:11,307 --> 00:13:15,567 It's we're not ignoring the systems that they're operating 249 00:13:15,567 --> 00:13:19,677 within, but ultimately it comes down to self as well, right? 250 00:13:19,677 --> 00:13:22,876 Because we can't coach and say, "You're not the problem, the 251 00:13:22,876 --> 00:13:25,917 system is." What do we do with that then, right? 252 00:13:26,047 --> 00:13:27,866 So it is about strategy. 253 00:13:28,346 --> 00:13:32,167 However, the other piece to this and, you know, the other work 254 00:13:32,177 --> 00:13:36,067 that I do working with organizations and the messaging 255 00:13:36,067 --> 00:13:40,356 that I try to get across in my writing is that there needs to 256 00:13:40,366 --> 00:13:46,267 be conversations about accountability for institutions, 257 00:13:46,297 --> 00:13:51,317 for folks who hold positional power, um, because that's just 258 00:13:51,317 --> 00:13:52,697 the reality of it, right? 259 00:13:52,697 --> 00:13:56,817 So if you want, and I know we'll get into this next, if you want 260 00:13:56,817 --> 00:14:03,557 an organization that is truly operating well, right, then 261 00:14:03,596 --> 00:14:07,047 these are things that have to be addressed. 262 00:14:07,076 --> 00:14:12,376 We can't work on problems if we fail to acknowledge the context, 263 00:14:12,836 --> 00:14:13,267 right? 264 00:14:13,267 --> 00:14:13,576 Yeah. 265 00:14:13,576 --> 00:14:16,417 So that's, that's the other part of the counter-narrative. 266 00:14:16,417 --> 00:14:21,256 So it's the we are not imposters, but also, you know, 267 00:14:21,267 --> 00:14:24,657 let's look at the systems and, and we have to be willing to 268 00:14:24,677 --> 00:14:27,971 look at them in order to move forward and make sure that our 269 00:14:27,971 --> 00:14:29,311 organizations are well. 270 00:14:30,220 --> 00:14:30,360 Rebecca Hamm: And 271 00:14:30,667 --> 00:14:30,677 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Mm-hmm. 272 00:14:30,740 --> 00:14:36,350 Rebecca Hamm: let's, let's have that chat This, uh, as I am 273 00:14:36,350 --> 00:14:38,639 understanding this, this is in the context of equity-centered 274 00:14:38,639 --> 00:14:39,220 leadership, 275 00:14:39,626 --> 00:14:39,937 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Yep. 276 00:14:39,940 --> 00:14:40,049 Rebecca Hamm: is 277 00:14:40,366 --> 00:14:40,667 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Yep 278 00:14:40,919 --> 00:14:45,149 Rebecca Hamm: an important part of building healthy systems, and 279 00:14:45,149 --> 00:14:49,320 we have spoken so far about, um, the gender 280 00:14:49,482 --> 00:14:49,493 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Mm-hmm. 281 00:14:50,179 --> 00:14:50,590 Rebecca Hamm: We've talked 282 00:14:50,643 --> 00:14:53,062 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Mm-hmm. 283 00:14:53,210 --> 00:14:53,929 Rebecca Hamm: this in June. 284 00:14:53,929 --> 00:14:56,179 It's LGBTQ plus month. 285 00:14:56,549 --> 00:15:02,259 Um, there is also the gender identity slice or the, the 286 00:15:02,259 --> 00:15:03,470 sexual orientation slice. 287 00:15:03,889 --> 00:15:08,039 And so as someone who has dedicated real time to studying 288 00:15:08,039 --> 00:15:10,960 these trends, talk to us, what are you seeing? 289 00:15:10,970 --> 00:15:12,789 What are the trends out there? 290 00:15:13,190 --> 00:15:17,720 And, um, for listeners who maybe have been seeing a whole lot of 291 00:15:17,730 --> 00:15:21,210 negative trends lately, is there any light at the end of the 292 00:15:21,210 --> 00:15:21,659 tunnel? 293 00:15:21,659 --> 00:15:24,070 Are there any bright spots that you can highlight for us? 294 00:15:26,712 --> 00:15:28,033 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: I would say... 295 00:15:28,432 --> 00:15:30,153 So the, the optimist in... 296 00:15:30,163 --> 00:15:31,793 I'm a realist and I'm an optimist. 297 00:15:31,822 --> 00:15:36,153 The optimist in me says, yes, there, there will always be 298 00:15:36,163 --> 00:15:36,822 bright spots. 299 00:15:37,773 --> 00:15:42,163 Um, however, we- it probably doesn't feel that way right now 300 00:15:42,163 --> 00:15:43,633 for a lot of people. 301 00:15:43,682 --> 00:15:47,472 Maybe not everyone, but for a lot of people, particularly like 302 00:15:47,472 --> 00:15:51,602 the clients who I tend to work with, they're not feeling like 303 00:15:51,602 --> 00:15:52,472 there's a bright spot. 304 00:15:52,533 --> 00:15:54,793 However, and again, I'm... 305 00:15:54,832 --> 00:15:57,932 I think this is across industry, but I will continue to give 306 00:15:57,932 --> 00:16:05,613 examples within higher ed, is that, you know, we, we saw what 307 00:16:05,623 --> 00:16:11,263 happened around 2020 after the murdering of George Floyd and 308 00:16:11,493 --> 00:16:15,013 the pandemic, and everyone was home paying attention to things 309 00:16:15,013 --> 00:16:19,592 that always existed, but they were now at the forefront. 310 00:16:19,682 --> 00:16:24,692 And we saw a trend in many industries, but again, 311 00:16:24,702 --> 00:16:28,732 specifically looking at higher ed, where it appeared as if 312 00:16:28,743 --> 00:16:33,993 higher ed was finally willing to have some difficult 313 00:16:33,993 --> 00:16:38,773 conversations about inequity, about, you know, as it relates 314 00:16:38,773 --> 00:16:42,982 to race, a- again, at that point, but really all 315 00:16:43,003 --> 00:16:47,393 identities, and really taking a hard look to s- to ask 316 00:16:47,413 --> 00:16:53,023 themselves, ask ourselves,"Are we doing our students, our 317 00:16:53,023 --> 00:16:55,972 faculty, our staff, our administrators well? 318 00:16:55,993 --> 00:17:01,528 Are we practicing?" So we saw Lots of diversity statements 319 00:17:01,538 --> 00:17:06,798 being created and plastered all over websites, and we saw 320 00:17:07,148 --> 00:17:12,308 divisions and departments and people hired into these equity, 321 00:17:12,338 --> 00:17:16,669 diversity, whatever you wanna call it, roles, many of which 322 00:17:16,729 --> 00:17:19,419 tended to be people of color. 323 00:17:19,669 --> 00:17:22,429 Um, we saw all of these things happening, right? 324 00:17:22,429 --> 00:17:24,179 So th- that was the trend. 325 00:17:24,929 --> 00:17:29,709 And as with any trend, um, that is directly impacted by what's 326 00:17:29,709 --> 00:17:34,598 happening in our society and in our country, we saw the pendulum 327 00:17:34,798 --> 00:17:39,118 s- shift all the way this way, and now six years later, the 328 00:17:39,118 --> 00:17:42,209 pendulum has shifted completely opposite. 329 00:17:42,548 --> 00:17:46,729 So what we're seeing now is everything that was done in 330 00:17:46,729 --> 00:17:51,239 2020, in many ways, being dismantled. 331 00:17:51,491 --> 00:17:51,511 Rebecca Hamm: Mm-hmm. 332 00:17:51,729 --> 00:17:55,278 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Um, positions no longer, departments 333 00:17:55,288 --> 00:18:00,769 no longer, wording that was once on websites completely vanished. 334 00:18:01,108 --> 00:18:05,078 Um, and then, and, you know, given the political climate in 335 00:18:05,078 --> 00:18:09,729 many ways, especially for state institutions where federal aid 336 00:18:09,739 --> 00:18:13,929 is sort of dangled, many institutions and those in senior 337 00:18:13,929 --> 00:18:18,545 leadership roles feeling forced to make these decisions Some 338 00:18:18,545 --> 00:18:21,694 made them quite easily, which was a, is a whole nother 339 00:18:21,694 --> 00:18:22,664 conversation. 340 00:18:23,134 --> 00:18:24,974 But we now see that happening. 341 00:18:25,394 --> 00:18:30,404 So what that tells me us- you know, from an equity-focused 342 00:18:30,404 --> 00:18:36,414 lens is that, um, or it makes me question, did that work really 343 00:18:36,535 --> 00:18:37,025 matter? 344 00:18:38,093 --> 00:18:43,339 Because in some ways, if it's so easy to undo was that really the 345 00:18:43,339 --> 00:18:46,586 work or was it a performative measure? 346 00:18:46,626 --> 00:18:50,116 And, and again, I think that varies by institution, right? 347 00:18:50,666 --> 00:18:54,326 But I think that's the trend that we see happening right now 348 00:18:54,326 --> 00:19:02,186 and unfortunately, you know, equity has been equated to or 349 00:19:02,186 --> 00:19:04,686 has been, you know, I, I guess I'll say equated to what's going 350 00:19:04,686 --> 00:19:09,346 on in our political climate where really if I had it my way 351 00:19:09,626 --> 00:19:13,207 and if we think about the topic that we're discussing, equity 352 00:19:13,207 --> 00:19:17,227 centered leadership, to me it's just leadership. 353 00:19:17,757 --> 00:19:22,037 To me, it's just the foundation of a good leader. 354 00:19:22,096 --> 00:19:26,297 It's the foundation or should be the foundation of a strong 355 00:19:26,317 --> 00:19:27,386 organization. 356 00:19:27,797 --> 00:19:32,057 Because at the heart of equity, what we're really saying is 357 00:19:32,346 --> 00:19:33,047 does... 358 00:19:33,356 --> 00:19:37,656 Have we taken measures, have we been intentional, and have we 359 00:19:37,656 --> 00:19:40,626 asked ourselves, is everyone that is part of this 360 00:19:40,626 --> 00:19:45,146 organization from, again, higher ed students all the way on up 361 00:19:45,146 --> 00:19:49,757 and senior level admins all the way to, you know, do they have 362 00:19:49,926 --> 00:19:50,906 what they need? 363 00:19:50,987 --> 00:19:56,737 Have they been set up to truly succeed, really, truly? 364 00:19:57,047 --> 00:19:58,517 Have they been set up? 365 00:19:58,747 --> 00:20:03,297 Because most of the time we're not taking those things into 366 00:20:03,297 --> 00:20:03,686 account. 367 00:20:03,696 --> 00:20:07,487 We're assuming that the measures, the policies, the 368 00:20:07,487 --> 00:20:11,386 cultures that we've created are great and that they will be 369 00:20:11,386 --> 00:20:12,606 great for everyone. 370 00:20:13,244 --> 00:20:13,394 Rebecca Hamm: Mm-hmm. 371 00:20:13,576 --> 00:20:16,317 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: So, you know, an, an equity-minded 372 00:20:16,317 --> 00:20:20,086 person would say,"These are great, but are we missing 373 00:20:20,165 --> 00:20:25,375 something Are these great for everyone?" Right? 374 00:20:25,454 --> 00:20:29,075 So, or are they just great, but who's the dominant narrative 375 00:20:29,075 --> 00:20:29,365 here? 376 00:20:29,942 --> 00:20:33,442 Rebecca Hamm: And so help a listener, somebody who is 377 00:20:33,442 --> 00:20:35,762 listening today and they're saying,"Wow, I've never thought 378 00:20:35,762 --> 00:20:36,992 of it like that before." 379 00:20:37,916 --> 00:20:37,926 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Mm-hmm. 380 00:20:38,022 --> 00:20:40,863 Rebecca Hamm: perhaps they're somebody who has benefited from 381 00:20:40,863 --> 00:20:41,923 the dominant narrative 382 00:20:41,931 --> 00:20:42,570 Nicole Pullia: womenleadwell.net 383 00:20:42,762 --> 00:20:45,992 Rebecca Hamm: hasn't been, um, harmed to the extent that 384 00:20:45,992 --> 00:20:47,982 they've become aware of that harm. 385 00:20:48,477 --> 00:20:48,926 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Yeah 386 00:20:49,252 --> 00:20:53,002 Rebecca Hamm: listeners be thinking about in terms of 387 00:20:53,042 --> 00:20:55,212 equity as it relates to organizational health? 388 00:20:55,222 --> 00:20:57,343 What sorts of questions should they be asking? 389 00:20:57,663 --> 00:21:01,682 And particularly in light of what you'd said, that in the US 390 00:21:01,702 --> 00:21:04,512 today, this is a really touchy subject, and a lot of 391 00:21:04,512 --> 00:21:08,182 organizations will not entertain the conversation because of fear 392 00:21:08,182 --> 00:21:09,563 of losing federal dollars. 393 00:21:09,792 --> 00:21:10,373 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Yes 394 00:21:10,393 --> 00:21:14,522 Rebecca Hamm: Do you have any tips for to engage in these 395 00:21:14,522 --> 00:21:20,972 conversations without doors slamming in your face or, um, or 396 00:21:20,982 --> 00:21:24,663 stepping into a, a conversation that, that some of the listeners 397 00:21:24,663 --> 00:21:28,192 of this podcast maybe don't have the power and influence to 398 00:21:28,192 --> 00:21:29,053 really be involved in? 399 00:21:29,505 --> 00:21:30,005 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Yeah. 400 00:21:30,063 --> 00:21:30,333 Rebecca Hamm: understand? 401 00:21:30,555 --> 00:21:32,744 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: You know, I, I think, you know, at the 402 00:21:32,785 --> 00:21:36,894 simplest level, here's what I would say, and that is, you 403 00:21:36,894 --> 00:21:41,184 know, I think the question should always be, you know, 404 00:21:41,184 --> 00:21:44,015 again, there's tons of examples, but I'm just thinking of, you 405 00:21:44,015 --> 00:21:46,724 know, I'm on the academic affairs side right now, so, you 406 00:21:46,724 --> 00:21:51,154 know, as you understand, lots of meetings with deans and provosts 407 00:21:51,154 --> 00:21:53,934 and, you know, all of those conversations, you know. 408 00:21:53,934 --> 00:21:57,684 And I think a way to approach the conversation simply is to 409 00:21:57,734 --> 00:22:01,634 ask the question of, you know, well, first of all, like, who, 410 00:22:02,855 --> 00:22:05,694 who was part of these conversations, right? 411 00:22:05,704 --> 00:22:09,654 Like, who was included as part of whatever, let's say it's a 412 00:22:09,654 --> 00:22:11,025 decision that was made. 413 00:22:11,434 --> 00:22:13,954 Who was included, right? 414 00:22:13,984 --> 00:22:15,154 That's number one. 415 00:22:15,505 --> 00:22:19,474 Um, because it- rather than saying,"Who did you not 416 00:22:19,474 --> 00:22:20,664 include," right? 417 00:22:20,674 --> 00:22:22,424 That's sort of a who did you exclude? 418 00:22:22,605 --> 00:22:25,744 The question is who did you include, right? 419 00:22:25,744 --> 00:22:28,775 And I think that's a fair question because that happens to 420 00:22:28,775 --> 00:22:29,105 any of... 421 00:22:29,115 --> 00:22:30,394 We all have blind spots. 422 00:22:30,595 --> 00:22:34,634 We all have implicit biases where we're operating within our 423 00:22:34,634 --> 00:22:39,055 own, you know, lens, and we're busy, and we're bu- you know, so 424 00:22:39,055 --> 00:22:41,095 we're gonna miss some things, right? 425 00:22:41,345 --> 00:22:46,984 So it is to an organization's benefit to include a varied set 426 00:22:47,005 --> 00:22:54,115 of voices, and not just for the purpose of, um, inviting someone 427 00:22:54,125 --> 00:22:57,464 simply because of an identity that they represent. 428 00:22:57,949 --> 00:22:58,409 Rebecca Hamm: Yeah 429 00:22:58,515 --> 00:22:59,075 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: correct. 430 00:22:59,095 --> 00:23:03,345 But that you truly invite them to be part of the conversations. 431 00:23:03,414 --> 00:23:06,934 And sometimes the question is, "Here's what we've come up with. 432 00:23:07,545 --> 00:23:09,755 What are we missing?" Right? 433 00:23:09,835 --> 00:23:11,184 Are we missing something? 434 00:23:11,525 --> 00:23:15,394 And that's the fair question, where it's a, it's not 435 00:23:15,394 --> 00:23:19,414 necessarily a defensive question, but it's a, it's 436 00:23:19,414 --> 00:23:21,375 about, you know, fairness. 437 00:23:21,684 --> 00:23:24,335 Now, as a parent, I don't like when my kids say,"That's not 438 00:23:24,335 --> 00:23:27,714 fair," because my natural instinct is to say,"Life is not 439 00:23:27,714 --> 00:23:29,664 fair." That's true, right? 440 00:23:29,694 --> 00:23:31,865 But when we're talking about equity, really what we're 441 00:23:31,865 --> 00:23:33,325 talking about is fairness. 442 00:23:34,105 --> 00:23:36,365 Was everyone considered? 443 00:23:36,625 --> 00:23:42,984 Can you take measures to ensure that what benefits some doesn't 444 00:23:43,375 --> 00:23:44,924 exclude other, right? 445 00:23:44,924 --> 00:23:47,605 There has to be some conversations there. 446 00:23:48,005 --> 00:23:51,625 Um, so I think the fair question is, you know, can you talk a 447 00:23:51,625 --> 00:23:55,545 little bit about, you know, who was part of this decision-making 448 00:23:55,545 --> 00:23:56,785 process, right? 449 00:23:56,785 --> 00:23:59,174 So sort of simple questions like that. 450 00:23:59,565 --> 00:24:02,949 And I think there's a s- there's a way to do that because if you 451 00:24:02,949 --> 00:24:07,396 say, or if I say you know,"Well, did you have any people of color 452 00:24:07,396 --> 00:24:11,886 on that committee?" The defense automatically goes up. 453 00:24:11,957 --> 00:24:14,537 And also, if the question is yes, that doesn't mean that it 454 00:24:14,537 --> 00:24:16,237 was still an equitable practice, right? 455 00:24:16,967 --> 00:24:23,111 But I think if we simply focus on equity as meaning Was 456 00:24:23,211 --> 00:24:25,921 everyone or as many people considered? 457 00:24:25,941 --> 00:24:29,310 Now, it doesn't mean that we can create this utopia where 458 00:24:29,351 --> 00:24:31,340 everyone will be, you know... 459 00:24:31,750 --> 00:24:35,881 But we have to sort of take a hard look at it, right? 460 00:24:35,881 --> 00:24:43,240 So I think we often overthink equity because media and society 461 00:24:43,250 --> 00:24:47,421 has done such a good job of making us fear the conversation, 462 00:24:47,996 --> 00:24:49,125 Rebecca Hamm: Mm-hmm. 463 00:24:49,135 --> 00:24:49,145 Mm-hmm. 464 00:24:49,270 --> 00:24:50,851 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: we rather, we just, we don't say 465 00:24:50,851 --> 00:24:55,817 anything at all, even if we're sensing like,"Hmm, that's really 466 00:24:55,837 --> 00:24:57,387 interesting," right? 467 00:24:57,417 --> 00:25:00,587 And I'm, I'm gonna give a really, really quick example 468 00:25:00,768 --> 00:25:05,357 because I think this probably oversimplifies, but some folks 469 00:25:05,357 --> 00:25:05,948 might get it. 470 00:25:06,307 --> 00:25:11,597 Um, my, part of my, what I'm calling my midlife, uh, play 471 00:25:11,607 --> 00:25:16,458 practice, uh, joy and creativity is, especially now, spring and 472 00:25:16,458 --> 00:25:18,367 summer, I like to garden. 473 00:25:18,708 --> 00:25:20,028 I like to plant. 474 00:25:20,248 --> 00:25:23,107 I've been working on my green thumb over the years. 475 00:25:23,647 --> 00:25:28,157 And I think about, you know, first of all, learning my 476 00:25:28,157 --> 00:25:33,268 environment outside, down to the sides of the house, which are 477 00:25:33,268 --> 00:25:35,807 full sun, which are partial sun, right? 478 00:25:36,018 --> 00:25:39,167 So if, if anyone knows anything about plants, the very first 479 00:25:39,167 --> 00:25:42,887 thing that you need to consider is how much sun do they need, or 480 00:25:42,887 --> 00:25:45,528 do they not like much sun at all, right? 481 00:25:45,938 --> 00:25:49,728 Because when I'm considering what plants to plant, I have to 482 00:25:49,728 --> 00:25:52,788 consider the conditions, right? 483 00:25:52,837 --> 00:25:53,758 The conditions. 484 00:25:53,758 --> 00:25:58,722 I can't just say that flower or that plant is beautiful, or I 485 00:25:58,722 --> 00:26:05,338 want some more color in my yard, and I'm just gonna pick Right? 486 00:26:05,509 --> 00:26:08,878 I have to consider the conditions because if that plant 487 00:26:08,878 --> 00:26:12,929 doesn't thrive, what that means is there's a variety of reasons, 488 00:26:13,028 --> 00:26:17,709 but if I neglected to even consider what that particular 489 00:26:17,709 --> 00:26:22,058 plant needed, the sun, the amount of water, the, the way 490 00:26:22,058 --> 00:26:25,999 you have to plant it, then that means I haven't done my due 491 00:26:26,068 --> 00:26:27,078 dili- diligence. 492 00:26:27,088 --> 00:26:31,648 I haven't necessarily practiced equitably as it relates to my 493 00:26:31,648 --> 00:26:32,759 gardening, right? 494 00:26:32,788 --> 00:26:34,429 Because I'm not even thinking about it. 495 00:26:34,548 --> 00:26:38,088 I'm like,"This is a great..." You know, I got some new mulch, 496 00:26:38,098 --> 00:26:39,229 which I just did. 497 00:26:39,229 --> 00:26:42,749 I got, you know, really great place to plant, but not for 498 00:26:42,749 --> 00:26:43,509 every plant. 499 00:26:43,808 --> 00:26:46,989 There are some things that I wanna plant that just will not 500 00:26:47,229 --> 00:26:51,878 thrive no matter what, or there are different things that I can 501 00:26:51,878 --> 00:26:56,769 do to ensure that this one plant thrives, and the other one I can 502 00:26:56,769 --> 00:26:57,199 kinda... 503 00:26:57,269 --> 00:26:57,838 It's good. 504 00:26:57,898 --> 00:27:01,638 Like, the conditions are already set up to support it, right? 505 00:27:01,898 --> 00:27:04,558 And I'm always thinking about equity, so as I'm gardening, of 506 00:27:04,558 --> 00:27:06,068 course, I'm thinking about it. 507 00:27:06,608 --> 00:27:08,179 But I read something and I... 508 00:27:08,199 --> 00:27:10,808 You know, like, we don't blame the plant, right? 509 00:27:10,808 --> 00:27:13,558 W- we have to look at the conditions. 510 00:27:13,568 --> 00:27:16,148 We have to look at how we treated it. 511 00:27:16,179 --> 00:27:20,259 And, and I think in many ways, that's what we're talking about, 512 00:27:20,628 --> 00:27:21,028 right? 513 00:27:21,038 --> 00:27:23,179 Like, that's what we're talking about, right? 514 00:27:23,179 --> 00:27:26,058 So in gardening, you're like, well, you're not, you know, 515 00:27:26,098 --> 00:27:28,048 equity centered guard- you're just gardening. 516 00:27:28,058 --> 00:27:29,749 Like, that's smart gardening. 517 00:27:30,108 --> 00:27:33,239 To me, that's smart leadership, right? 518 00:27:33,269 --> 00:27:38,068 It ensures that folks feel seen and connected and heard, and 519 00:27:38,078 --> 00:27:42,028 ultimately, people will do better at their roles because 520 00:27:42,028 --> 00:27:46,428 they feel like, and they've been set up to succeed 521 00:27:46,605 --> 00:27:48,714 Rebecca Hamm: Well, and so let me ask about this, because when 522 00:27:48,714 --> 00:27:53,214 you had said that fundamentally equity was about fairness, my 523 00:27:53,214 --> 00:27:57,194 initial thought was, well, I don't, didn't think about equity 524 00:27:57,194 --> 00:27:57,795 that way. 525 00:27:57,835 --> 00:28:00,714 I think equity is about outcomes and performance. 526 00:28:00,842 --> 00:28:01,432 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Mm-hmm 527 00:28:02,115 --> 00:28:04,085 Rebecca Hamm: and this could be a personal, you know, everyone 528 00:28:04,095 --> 00:28:07,904 has different beliefs, but, but the data is pretty compelling 529 00:28:08,265 --> 00:28:13,214 that equity, that diver- diversity specifically has been 530 00:28:13,214 --> 00:28:16,224 really well studied, but I would assume equity would feed into 531 00:28:16,224 --> 00:28:16,684 this, 532 00:28:16,905 --> 00:28:16,915 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Mm-hmm. 533 00:28:16,974 --> 00:28:20,015 Rebecca Hamm: that the more equitable an organization, the 534 00:28:20,015 --> 00:28:22,664 better performing the individuals in the organization 535 00:28:22,664 --> 00:28:23,494 will be for 536 00:28:23,625 --> 00:28:23,746 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Yes. 537 00:28:23,746 --> 00:28:23,895 Yeah 538 00:28:24,055 --> 00:28:28,204 Rebecca Hamm: host of reasons related to actual ability to do 539 00:28:28,204 --> 00:28:30,424 their job without friction and roadblocks, 540 00:28:30,761 --> 00:28:31,362 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Yes 541 00:28:31,765 --> 00:28:34,115 Rebecca Hamm: the, the fulfillment that comes from 542 00:28:34,115 --> 00:28:36,144 knowing that you're being supported and the impact that 543 00:28:36,154 --> 00:28:39,154 has on morale and motivation and output and work ethic. 544 00:28:39,715 --> 00:28:40,006 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Yep 545 00:28:40,625 --> 00:28:42,615 Rebecca Hamm: and when you talk about the garden, I hear the 546 00:28:42,615 --> 00:28:43,305 same thing. 547 00:28:43,315 --> 00:28:47,494 Certain plants thrive under certain conditions, and they 548 00:28:47,505 --> 00:28:49,134 falter under others. 549 00:28:49,481 --> 00:28:49,821 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Yes 550 00:28:50,184 --> 00:28:53,464 Rebecca Hamm: So tar- and maybe, maybe the answer is, well, it's 551 00:28:53,464 --> 00:28:53,815 both. 552 00:28:53,825 --> 00:28:54,994 It can be about fairness, and 553 00:28:55,049 --> 00:28:55,140 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Mm-hmm. 554 00:28:55,194 --> 00:28:56,194 Rebecca Hamm: be about performance. 555 00:28:56,224 --> 00:28:56,484 But 556 00:28:56,559 --> 00:28:56,930 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Mm-hmm. 557 00:28:57,095 --> 00:28:59,275 Rebecca Hamm: see those two in relationship? 558 00:28:59,275 --> 00:29:00,744 Is it worth pulling them apart? 559 00:29:00,755 --> 00:29:01,775 Do we just say that, 560 00:29:02,218 --> 00:29:04,107 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: No, I think they're directly related. 561 00:29:04,147 --> 00:29:06,288 I think the outcomes... 562 00:29:06,327 --> 00:29:10,498 Now again, the, when, when you're thinking as a, um, as an 563 00:29:10,498 --> 00:29:13,627 administrator and, you know, like that's, that's where we go, 564 00:29:13,657 --> 00:29:18,238 and that's the way that we have to approach this work'cause 565 00:29:18,238 --> 00:29:20,837 there's, it's, it's, it's really both, right? 566 00:29:21,178 --> 00:29:23,347 So as it relates to outcomes, yes. 567 00:29:23,367 --> 00:29:27,428 I mean, for an organization, if you have done your due diligence 568 00:29:27,468 --> 00:29:32,347 and continue to do your due diligence, then you will 569 00:29:32,387 --> 00:29:35,097 absolutely have better outcomes, right? 570 00:29:35,218 --> 00:29:38,373 People will be more likely to stay They will be better at 571 00:29:38,373 --> 00:29:39,153 their roles. 572 00:29:39,163 --> 00:29:40,502 They will produ- right? 573 00:29:40,512 --> 00:29:44,512 So it's, I have, um, I have a book coming out on this very 574 00:29:44,512 --> 00:29:48,923 topic, and one of my authors, um, wrote about and has done 575 00:29:48,932 --> 00:29:53,262 research specifically for senior women, senior leaders. 576 00:29:53,303 --> 00:29:57,053 Um, her work is looking at Black women in senior leadership 577 00:29:57,053 --> 00:29:57,333 roles. 578 00:29:57,343 --> 00:30:01,532 She's at the chief of staff level, and she talks about this 579 00:30:01,613 --> 00:30:07,232 sort of, um, audit, if you will, that she believes organizations 580 00:30:07,242 --> 00:30:12,692 should use to ensure that even before someone is hired into a 581 00:30:12,692 --> 00:30:16,373 role, that you are auditing your organization. 582 00:30:16,373 --> 00:30:19,972 And she came up with different, you know, sort of checkpoints to 583 00:30:19,972 --> 00:30:24,702 ensure that even before someone is hired, they are set up to 584 00:30:24,702 --> 00:30:28,732 succeed internally, but ultimately to produce the 585 00:30:28,732 --> 00:30:32,242 outcomes that you hired them to produce, and to produce them 586 00:30:32,252 --> 00:30:33,893 well, right? 587 00:30:33,932 --> 00:30:34,923 So it's not... 588 00:30:34,932 --> 00:30:39,232 The diversity piece has really been about, and we saw this 589 00:30:39,232 --> 00:30:45,202 happen in 2020 as well, um, lots of folks being hired or, you 590 00:30:45,202 --> 00:30:47,472 know, let's, let's put a person of color, you know. 591 00:30:47,472 --> 00:30:51,272 Like, we lack diversity, so let's hire more Black and Brown 592 00:30:51,272 --> 00:30:56,769 folks But what was happening and still happening is you can hire, 593 00:30:56,788 --> 00:31:01,628 that's the diversity, but the equity is have you done your due 594 00:31:01,628 --> 00:31:05,348 diligence to ensure that those fo- and really everyone. 595 00:31:05,358 --> 00:31:08,898 'Cause when I talk about equity, I'm talking about everyone, not 596 00:31:08,898 --> 00:31:10,648 just people of color, right? 597 00:31:11,088 --> 00:31:13,999 It's for the overall health and wellness for the entire 598 00:31:13,999 --> 00:31:15,068 organization. 599 00:31:15,469 --> 00:31:19,739 But ultimately, there's enough data out there to show you will 600 00:31:19,739 --> 00:31:23,108 absolutely get better, better outcomes if this is the way that 601 00:31:23,108 --> 00:31:24,528 you continue to practice. 602 00:31:24,888 --> 00:31:26,818 So she talks about, her name is Dr. 603 00:31:26,818 --> 00:31:31,419 Kyra Lobins, she talks about it as like equity-centered 604 00:31:31,419 --> 00:31:34,669 leadership is a fiduciary responsibility. 605 00:31:34,719 --> 00:31:40,078 And I'm like,"I love that." It is a fiduciary responsibility 606 00:31:40,078 --> 00:31:41,058 because what happens? 607 00:31:41,108 --> 00:31:43,999 People leaving roles, now you have to refill it, right? 608 00:31:44,019 --> 00:31:46,088 Like, there's money attached to 609 00:31:46,229 --> 00:31:46,838 Rebecca Hamm: Mm-hmm 610 00:31:46,929 --> 00:31:49,179 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: all of these inequitable practices, and 611 00:31:49,179 --> 00:31:52,929 this is the way we need to, to talk about the work to 612 00:31:52,929 --> 00:31:56,219 administrators, right, to board members. 613 00:31:56,219 --> 00:32:00,338 And you know, like the counselor in me, you know, also talks 614 00:32:00,338 --> 00:32:01,699 about, yeah, but... 615 00:32:01,719 --> 00:32:02,848 'Cause people can produce... 616 00:32:02,909 --> 00:32:04,729 Here's the other, the last thing I'll say. 617 00:32:05,259 --> 00:32:10,568 The outcomes can still be produced, so on paper it looks 618 00:32:10,648 --> 00:32:13,659 as if that person is thriving. 619 00:32:14,499 --> 00:32:18,659 But if you talk to them, they will tell you a completely 620 00:32:18,659 --> 00:32:19,739 different story. 621 00:32:20,088 --> 00:32:23,489 So for a lot of us, and you might have your own stories of 622 00:32:23,489 --> 00:32:28,209 like,"Well, yeah, I was, I was kicking butt in my role, 623 00:32:28,409 --> 00:32:31,519 however," fill in the blank, right? 624 00:32:31,568 --> 00:32:34,239 Like, so that's where the coaching component comes in as 625 00:32:34,239 --> 00:32:36,878 well because same thing with students. 626 00:32:36,878 --> 00:32:40,669 Like, when I was doing student research, my students were, you 627 00:32:40,669 --> 00:32:44,989 know, 3.5 and above GPAs, you would think. 628 00:32:44,999 --> 00:32:48,019 And to the university, they retained them, they graduated 629 00:32:48,019 --> 00:32:48,378 them. 630 00:32:48,679 --> 00:32:52,189 So on paper, it looked, and these were, you know, Black and 631 00:32:52,189 --> 00:32:53,749 Latinx students, first gen. 632 00:32:53,778 --> 00:32:58,308 On paper, one would say that those students were thriving 633 00:32:58,858 --> 00:33:01,618 because the grades told one story. 634 00:33:02,019 --> 00:33:07,348 The qualitative researcher in me knows that's not the full story, 635 00:33:07,818 --> 00:33:08,239 right? 636 00:33:08,499 --> 00:33:11,169 So yes, I think it depends who you're talking to. 637 00:33:11,209 --> 00:33:15,189 Unfortunately, and I hate this, but this is true, when you're 638 00:33:15,189 --> 00:33:21,459 talking about making budgetary decisions and you have to focus 639 00:33:21,459 --> 00:33:24,959 on the outcomes and the fiduciary responsibility first, 640 00:33:25,209 --> 00:33:28,479 we can't just go in and say, "Yeah, but this person doesn't 641 00:33:28,479 --> 00:33:31,578 feel like they belong." That's not gonna fly. 642 00:33:31,648 --> 00:33:34,929 It's true, but we have to reframe that, right? 643 00:33:34,929 --> 00:33:38,719 Like, so you, you kinda learn to, to say the same thing, but 644 00:33:38,719 --> 00:33:39,919 in a different way. 645 00:33:39,959 --> 00:33:41,949 Um, but yes, it's both. 646 00:33:42,038 --> 00:33:42,838 Absolutely 647 00:33:43,067 --> 00:33:43,356 Rebecca Hamm: Yeah. 648 00:33:43,366 --> 00:33:43,886 Thank you. 649 00:33:44,707 --> 00:33:47,707 So Nicole, what is one message that you wanna leave with 650 00:33:47,707 --> 00:33:48,567 listeners today? 651 00:33:50,737 --> 00:33:51,446 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Just one. 652 00:33:51,906 --> 00:34:00,623 Um, I think it would be we cannot ensure The health and 653 00:34:00,623 --> 00:34:04,863 wellness of our organizations, or we cannot... 654 00:34:04,913 --> 00:34:08,313 I'm also thinking about, like, even the title of your podcast, 655 00:34:08,322 --> 00:34:10,824 which I love Joyfully Unstoppable, right? 656 00:34:10,844 --> 00:34:17,034 Like, we can't ensure anything, joy, wellness, health, 657 00:34:17,103 --> 00:34:21,963 personally or if we're looking at institutions, unless we are 658 00:34:21,963 --> 00:34:24,414 willing to look at the hard truths. 659 00:34:25,403 --> 00:34:27,684 We have to look at the hard truths. 660 00:34:27,744 --> 00:34:29,983 We cannot move forward. 661 00:34:30,293 --> 00:34:33,123 We--'cause otherwise that's just putting a Band-Aid on it. 662 00:34:33,193 --> 00:34:37,594 If we're willing to do the real work, whether that's personally 663 00:34:37,623 --> 00:34:42,253 for ourselves or whether that's, you know, as an institution, we 664 00:34:42,253 --> 00:34:45,333 have to be willing to look at the truth. 665 00:34:46,074 --> 00:34:48,284 That's the only way forward. 666 00:34:48,344 --> 00:34:51,684 Um, you know, it's like you have to get through the good, bad, 667 00:34:51,684 --> 00:34:55,134 and the ugly before the work begins. 668 00:34:55,487 --> 00:34:55,697 Rebecca Hamm: Mm-hmm. 669 00:34:55,804 --> 00:34:58,224 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: I truly believe that from a personal, 670 00:34:58,264 --> 00:35:00,663 professional, and institutional level 671 00:35:00,777 --> 00:35:02,867 Rebecca Hamm: Yeah, I think that is so important. 672 00:35:03,257 --> 00:35:06,547 And we can not wanna look at that for a whole host of 673 00:35:06,547 --> 00:35:07,228 reasons, 674 00:35:07,231 --> 00:35:08,952 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Oh, it's easy to not look at it. 675 00:35:09,052 --> 00:35:10,251 Eh, I'll look at it later. 676 00:35:10,291 --> 00:35:11,152 Oh, I'll go here. 677 00:35:11,172 --> 00:35:12,112 I'll do this. 678 00:35:13,065 --> 00:35:13,476 Rebecca Hamm: Yeah. 679 00:35:14,052 --> 00:35:14,152 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Yeah 680 00:35:14,195 --> 00:35:16,356 Rebecca Hamm: So if someone would like to learn more about 681 00:35:16,356 --> 00:35:19,076 Real and Worthy or maybe work with you directly, how can they 682 00:35:19,076 --> 00:35:19,606 find you? 683 00:35:20,210 --> 00:35:20,639 Nicole Pulliam, Ph.D.: Yeah. 684 00:35:21,010 --> 00:35:23,000 Um, so I'm very active on LinkedIn. 685 00:35:23,010 --> 00:35:26,150 You can just find me there, Nicole Pulliam, PhD. 686 00:35:26,190 --> 00:35:30,219 Um, my website is my full name, nicolepulliam.com. 687 00:35:30,362 --> 00:35:33,771 um, my website is in the process of being revamped, but it is 688 00:35:33,771 --> 00:35:35,902 still very active right now. 689 00:35:35,931 --> 00:35:39,422 Um, I am active on Instagram, but I tend to do the most work 690 00:35:39,902 --> 00:35:44,452 on LinkedIn Um, so they can find me on either LinkedIn or my 691 00:35:44,452 --> 00:35:44,942 website 692 00:35:45,469 --> 00:35:45,800 Rebecca Hamm: Great. 693 00:35:45,800 --> 00:35:46,840 Well, thank you, Dr. 694 00:35:46,840 --> 00:35:49,690 Pulliam, so much for coming on the Joyfully Unstoppable 695 00:35:49,699 --> 00:35:50,389 podcast. 696 00:35:50,800 --> 00:35:54,000 I have learned a ton today, and I know that the listeners have 697 00:35:54,019 --> 00:35:54,630 as well. 698 00:35:55,329 --> 00:35:58,539 Now, if today's episode spoke to you, I would love for you to 699 00:35:58,539 --> 00:35:59,809 share it with a friend. 700 00:35:59,889 --> 00:36:03,469 We need more women leading from alignment, not adrenaline. 701 00:36:03,949 --> 00:36:06,750 And if you haven't already, please make sure to like and 702 00:36:06,750 --> 00:36:09,130 subscribe so you don't miss next week's drop. 703 00:36:09,750 --> 00:36:13,920 Remember, joyful, sustainable, and authentic leadership is 704 00:36:13,920 --> 00:36:17,630 possible, and you deserve to enjoy every minute of it. 705 00:36:18,280 --> 00:36:22,599 Until next time, this is Becky Hamm, and this is Joyfully 706 00:36:22,659 --> 00:36:23,500 Unstoppable.