The B2B Podcast Index
Index
All categories
MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
MethodologySubmit
Best of:MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
An independent project byFame
SearchBest episodesGuestsInsightsMethodologySubmit a podcast
Index/Marketing/The E-Comm Show
The E-Comm Show artwork

The Truth About Selling Your E-Commerce Business | EP. #235

The E-Comm Show · 2026-06-17 · 24 min

0:00--:--

Key moments - from our scoring

Substance score

53 / 100

Five dimensions, 20 points each

Insight Density11 / 20
Originality10 / 20
Guest Caliber13 / 20
Specificity & Evidence12 / 20
Conversational Craft7 / 20

Paul Rafelson draws on over two decades of legal experience and firsthand knowledge of the Amazon seller ecosystem to break down what actually happens when you sell an e-commerce business. During the 2020-2021 aggregator bubble, small e-commerce companies commanded inflated multiples - often 6x revenue in closing cash - driven by venture-backed aggregators' need to deploy capital. That market has normalized dramatically; a $1-2M SDE business today typically fetches 3x multiple versus 6x just two years ago. Beyond valuations, Rafelson identifies critical broker contract issues that trap sellers: default language making sellers liable for broker commissions even if they walk away from a letter of intent, overly broad restrictions on contacting prospects, and success definitions tied to LOI rather than closed deals. He advocates hiring a lawyer to negotiate broker agreements before engaging intermediaries, emphasizing that M&A is fundamentally about risk allocation across purchase documents, not just price negotiation. With SBA lending caps recently raised from $5M to $10M, Rafelson predicts another aggregator wave, likely packaged as AI-driven roll-ups. His firm serves the "global small business" - sellers importing from China and selling across multiple countries - with specialized guidance on IP, corporate structuring, investor management, and Prop 65 compliance.

Key takeaways

  • →Broker contracts often trap sellers with commission obligations even after walking away from a letter of intent; hire a lawyer to renegotiate default terms before signing.
  • →Valuation multiples for small e-commerce businesses have roughly halved from the 2020-2021 aggregator bubble (6x down to 3x), making 2021 exits exceptionally valuable in retrospect.
  • →M&A complexity centers on risk allocation across full purchase documents, not just LOI price negotiation; an ironclad contract cannot force a buyer to perform if they lack funds.
  • →Broker success definitions are problematic when tied to LOI signature rather than closed deals, potentially locking sellers into three-year commission obligations for introductions that never convert.
  • →The recently increased SBA lending cap to $10M from $5M may trigger another aggregator consolidation wave, this time marketed as AI-enabled roll-ups.

Guests

Paul Rafelson

Topics in this episode

SBA lendingValuation multiplesRafelson LawSeller BasicsAmazon sellerse-commerce M&Aaggregator bubblebroker contractsletter of intent (LOI)purchase documents

Questions this episode answers

Should I hire a lawyer before working with a broker to sell my e-commerce business?

Yes. Rafelson recommends hiring a lawyer before engaging a broker to negotiate contract terms that protect you, such as limiting commission obligations to actual closed deals rather than letters of intent, and narrowing exclusivity clauses that lock you in for three years based on broker email blasts.

What do e-commerce business valuations typically look like today versus 2021?

In 2021 during the aggregator boom, small companies ($1-2M SDE) fetched 6x closing cash multiples. Today, those same companies command approximately 3x multiples, representing roughly a 50% decline as the venture-backed acquisition frenzy has normalized.

Why can't a lawyer's contract force a buyer to pay earn-outs after closing?

Even a perfectly written contract cannot force money to grow on trees; if the buyer lacks funds or becomes insolvent, enforcement through courts is difficult and expensive, so sellers must be comfortable with the closing cash deal they receive.

What is the main difference between negotiating a letter of intent and full purchase documents in M&A?

LOI negotiation focuses on price, while full purchase document negotiation is about risk allocation - identifying areas of risk and assigning responsibility among parties, which is where real M&A complexity lives.

What problematic language should I watch for in broker contracts?

Avoid clauses that obligate you to pay commission if you walk away from an LOI, overly broad restrictions preventing you from contacting prospects the broker emailed, and definitions of broker success tied to LOI rather than closed deals.

What our scoring noted

Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.

Insight Density

11 / 20

The episode contains a handful of genuinely useful, practitioner-level observations - broker commission traps on walked-away LOIs, the LOI-as-price-negotiation vs. purchase-document-as-risk-negotiation framing, and current multiple benchmarks - but roughly half the runtime is background biography, mid-roll ads, banter, and garbled cross-talk, diluting the per-minute yield.

if you walk away from an LOI, you still owe us our commission, right, which is crazy
a letter of intent is like negotiating the price. When you negotiate the full purchase documents, we're actually doing a risk negotiation

Originality

10 / 20

The ethical argument against lawyer success fees and the prediction of an AI-branded second aggregator bubble are mildly fresh angles, but the rest - brokers care only about closing, hire a specialist lawyer, M&A is complex - are well-worn takes in the e-commerce operator community.

I know everybody's trying to do their own M and A on Claude, but it's like they kind of missed the underlying context, which is this is really about risk management
if my getting paid was determinative of your deal closing, there's a consideration that that's an ethical quandary

Guest Caliber

13 / 20

Rafelson is a genuine practitioner with 21 years of legal experience, Fortune 500 in-house background, and verifiable throughput during the aggregator boom - credible for this niche - but he is a specialist service provider whose expertise is narrowly relevant and he is not a scaled operator who has built and exited businesses himself.

by the end of 2020 I think we were closing, and it was like something six or seven deals a week
I worked for Microsoft, for Walmart, or General Electric, and then about nine years ago, I wrote a blog post about a tax issue affecting Amazon sellers

Specificity & Evidence

12 / 20

The episode does deliver concrete benchmarks - 2x at sub-$250k profit, 3x above $500k SDE, SBA limit now $10M, $200/month for Seller Basics - and uses Dollar Shave Club/Unilever as a named strategic-acquisition example, though several claims (the aggregator lending scheme mechanics, the earn-out failure rates) are gestured at rather than evidenced.

if you're, if you're doing like 200,000 profit, 250 like you could be looking at, like, a 2x closing cash deal easily, so you know, once you kind of get over that 500 to 600,000 threshold, you tend to start to see 3x pop around more often
Dollar Shave Club just went to a random broker and got, you know, 4x that wouldn't have been as good a deal as what they got from Unilever

Conversational Craft

7 / 20

The host asks standard biographical openers, offers uncritical affirmations throughout, and never probes the guest's claims - no pushback on earn-out risk percentages, no challenge to the 'another bubble is coming' prediction, and his attempt to set up the broker question dissolves into a confused, self-correcting ramble.

Yeah, the mergers and acquisition side is obviously very sexy, so very curious, curious on that side.
someone great once told me, and I think his name was Paul, that you should still have a lawyer before you go to a distributor... or broker, sorry, damn it.

Conversation analysis

Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.

Most-used words

amazon16paul15rafelson15deal15million12broker12long11andrew10maff10commerce10seller10lawyer10sellers10back9show8clients8

Episode notes

Selling an e-commerce business is often the biggest financial transaction a founder will ever make. In this episode of The E-Comm Show, Andrew Maff talks with Paul Rafelson, Founder of Rafelson Law and SellerBasics , about business valuations, acquisitions, legal pitfalls, and what founders need to know before entering the M&A process. Learn how to protect yourself, maximize value, and avoid the mistakes that cost sellers millions. What You'll Learn: How e-commerce valuations have changed since the aggregator boom The biggest mistakes founders make when selling their business How broker agreements can impact your exit What buyers look for in today's acquisition market

Full transcript

24 min

Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.

1 - > Paul Rafelson: The brokers are typically like real estate 2 - > agents, like a lot of them are going to just tell you what you 3 - > want to hear, so you'll push the deal forward. They don't care 4 - > what happens to you after the deal closes. 5 - > Narrator: Welcome to the Ecom Show Podcast. I'm your host, 6 - > Andrew Maff, owner and founder of Blue Tusker.

From 7 - > groundbreaking industry updates to success stories and 8 - > strategies, get to know the ins and outs of the e-commerce 9 - > industry from top leaders in the space. Let's get into it! 10 - > Andrew Maff: Hello, everyone. 11 - > Welcome to another episode of The Ecomm Show.

As usual, I'm 12 - > your host, Andrew Maff, and today I am joined by the great 13 - > Paul Rafelson, Rafelson Law and Seller Basics. Paul, how you 14 - > doing, buddy? Ready for a good show? 15 - > Paul Rafelson: I'm ready for a good show.

You? 16 - > Andrew Maff: I am. This is going to be great. I'm super excited 17 - > to have you on the show.

I actually, for whatever reason, 18 - > so many conversations with like different people, in like 19 - > lawyers and attorneys, and all this different stuff in 20 - > e-commerce, everyone's got an opinion, everyone's got a 21 - > thought, and super excited to have this conversation with you. 22 - > What I usually like to do here, just to kind of give everybody a 23 - > little bit of a lay the land, is start them off relatively 24 - > stereotypically. I'd like to give you the floor, just tell us 25 - > a little bit about, like, your background, how you got started 26 - > at Rafelson Law, how you started it, and we'll take it from 27 - > there.

28 - > Paul Rafelson: Sounds great. All right, well, yeah, thanks for 29 - > having me on. Yeah, my name is Paul Rafelson, and I've started 30 - > Rafelson Law back in 2017 and Seller Basics is another company 31 - > that I run, which is started in 2020 Yeah, I've been a lawyer 32 - > for going on 21 years since I left Villanova, generally saying 33 - > because I know you're local. Go Philly, but yeah, no, it's been, 34 - > it's been an interesting journey.

I work most of my life, 35 - > I work for really big companies, I worked for Microsoft, for 36 - > Walmart, or General Electric, and then about nine years ago, I 37 - > wrote a blog post about a tax issue affecting Amazon sellers 38 - > and the constitutional law issues around that, that made 39 - > that argument that you know all the sellers were tax cheats, 40 - > kind of weak, and we just, that sort of snowballed into a full 41 - > practice. I always say, like, you know, we, I was an Amazon 42 - > seller 20 years ago, believe it or not, or 20-24, years ago, I 43 - > don't know how long it's been, but back when I was in law 44 - > school, and I was at Villanova, I was paying for school, flippin 45 - > DVDs and video games and things like that, so I had had some 46 - > understanding of the Amazon world when I was asked to write 47 - > this blog post and some frame of reference, and it just kind of 48 - > went somewhere and turned into this need to have a small 49 - > business law practice, and that's that's what I did, but 50 - > totally unintentional, totally accidental.

51 - > And today, you know, I always say, like, we're focused on what 52 - > I call the global small business, that you know, before, 53 - > before e-commerce, before the internet, right? You would never 54 - > say I'm a global small business. 55 - > It kind of sounds weird, but you know it's probably the most 56 - > common description of every one of our clients who are in the 57 - > space or small businesses, is that they're global small 58 - > businesses, that they're importing from China, they're 59 - > selling in all different countries, right?

So that the 60 - > idea was to kind of bring that GE, Microsoft, Walmart 61 - > experience of multinational corporate practice to Amazon 62 - > sellers in e-commerce sellers, not just Amazon, all e-commerce 63 - > companies, just so that they kind of have that kind of 64 - > guidance that they need, so that they're aware of the potential 65 - > pitfalls that are out there, because I always say, like, the 66 - > lawyer you would hire to open up a store in the middle of Main 67 - > Street isn't the lawyer you want to work with when you're opening 68 - > up an e-commerce store.

You need a lot more specialty, a lot more 69 - > focus on specific subject matters. So that's pretty much 70 - > how it happened in a nutshell. 71 - > Just kind of, you know, wrote a blog and it snowballed from 72 - > there. 73 - > Andrew Maff: Yeah, that's awesome.

So, like, what's the.. 74 - > you have, like, a specialty now? 75 - > Obviously, the blog was tax-related, but are you still 76 - > focused on the tax side? Are you like suspensions, acquisitions?

77 - > What's.. what's the.. what's the focus right now? 78 - > Paul Rafelson: Yeah, so tax is something I know a lot about.

I 79 - > have a master's law and tax, and I in constitutional law and tax 80 - > is a really different ball game. 81 - > It's really has to do with constitutional law when you're 82 - > dealing with state tax. So that's kind of how I got in. I 83 - > got a little bit type casted, I'll be honest, but no, we were 84 - > our practice over the last seven or eight years has been very 85 - > little tax, actually.

It's been mostly IP,mergers and 86 - > acquisitions, so helping sellers buy or sell or Amazon business 87 - > or e-commerce companies, we do a ton of that, corporate 88 - > structuring, partner, you know, managing investors, if you want 89 - > to take on investors, you want private equity, whatever, 90 - > whatever it is, we kind of do it, Prop 65 compliance with just 91 - > general compliance issues with your products, we built a firm 92 - > that is just solely focused on the needs of meeting the needs 93 - > of 90 odd percent of Amazon sellers, that you know, we 94 - > believe our firm can proud, you know, can easily support most 95 - > Amazon sellers, and I say most, because, yeah, there's going to 96 - > be some that are just going to be so highly specialized, so 97 - > they're probably going to need something a little bit different 98 - > than you know, but for most Amazon sellers we really, really 99 - > try to be on top of it.

Whether you're selling supplements, 100 - > whether you're a reseller, doesn't really matter. We've 101 - > been through, you know, we've been at this for a long time. 102 - > We've been doing it for a long time. 103 - > Andrew Maff: Yeah, the mergers and acquisition side is 104 - > obviously very sexy, so very curious, curious on that side.

105 - > Let's, let's go back in time for a second, because obviously 106 - > you've been at this for a while. 107 - > What was it like, and what do you see as the differences now 108 - > comparative to the like aggregator fun time, fun roller 109 - > coaster that we had for a few years there? 110 - > Paul Rafelson: Yeah, no, that was a fun time. So that really 111 - > we had an M and A practice in 2018 We had M and A practice in 112 - > 2019 but really wasn't really that busy.

And then in 2020 or 113 - > it's actually in 2019 we started working with a few of the 114 - > aggregators, and 2020 came around. We were doing a few 115 - > more. Well, it's not 2020 we're doing a ton more. By the end of 116 - > 2020 I think we were closing, and it was like something six or 117 - > seven deals a week.

It was, it was insane. In the last 118 - > everybody wanted to get their deals closed ASAP before the end 119 - > of the year, because the way these aggregators worked was 120 - > they, you know, the only way they got the money out from 121 - > those, and you know, they say we raised 100 million, but they 122 - > can't touch that money unless they have targets identified, 123 - > because that's how they every time they acquire a target, you 124 - > know, if you acquire a target for a million dollars, your 125 - > valuation theory of your company as the acquirer theoretically 126 - > goes to that 4 million, so you have more room to be, you know, 127 - > there's this whole scheme that some of the lenders that went 128 - > across different aggregators were doing, so it was fun.

129 - > No, we, it was an absolute bubble. I have Facebook posts 130 - > talking about it, but it was a great time to be a seller. I 131 - > mean, if you sold in 2021 you did well. Now, could you have 132 - > done better holding on to the company yourself?

Maybe with the 133 - > company of grown, maybe, but if you were to sell today, you know 134 - > that that multiple of, you know, 6x that might have been common, 135 - > and I'm talking about closing cash, not not all in with earn 136 - > outs and other incentives, but just in terms of closing cash, 137 - > we were seeing 6x payouts for companies that don't usually 138 - > command that kind of multiple, but that's how crazy the market 139 - > was, and so now it's probably, you know, if it's sort of like a 140 - > one to $2 million company, you're probably looking at, 141 - > like, you know, not only picking on the small companies, but it's 142 - > just they're easier to sort of explain it, like you're probably 143 - > looking at about a 3x multiple, big give or take, right?

So it's 144 - > multiples have come down in half, but theoretically you 145 - > should have, if your earnings have gone up and up and up over 146 - > those few years. You probably still did better keeping the 147 - > money and growing the business, but for those who people wanted 148 - > to exit, that was a great time to exit in 2021 because they 149 - > were getting those. 150 - > They knew my clients, unlike other folks' clients, my clients 151 - > pitched million in lending, now you've 152 - > knew they were not going to see those rentals, they were not 153 - > going to get those payments, because, like I would explain to 154 - > them, I said, 'Look, I can write the best contract in the world 155 - > for you.

I can write the most ironclad contract world has ever 156 - > seen, but there's a very good chance their investors won't 157 - > allow them to sign it. And two, even if they do, the end of the 158 - > day, I can't make money grow on trees, right? So you could have 159 - > an open and shut case, right, but going to court and actually 160 - > enforcing those rights and collecting on these companies is 161 - > a whole nother story, so I always made sure my clients 162 - > understood, especially during the aggregator bubble, that you 163 - > know you've got to be comfortable with the deal you're 164 - > making at the door here, because there's a, there's a high 165 - > possibility what these guys are doing has never been done 166 - > before, it's kind of risky, it's kind of irresponsible the way 167 - > got a lot of room to really, really go and buy some 168 - > they were doing it, I mean, it was, I mean, just some of the 169 - > stuff was crazy, and you just have to understand that you're 170 - > companies, you know, using SBA loans, which sometimes these, 171 - > not going to see that.

So, our clients were very, very, very 172 - > even these big aggregators, they would do that just to get, just 173 - > fairly warned about the situation of where the earn outs 174 - > were going to go, and where I thought these companies were 175 - > to take advantage of the favorable rates. 176 - > going to be, but you know, they did get a 6x multiple, so there 177 - > was there was that. Today, it's definitely lower multiples, 178 - > although we just had a big news event about a week or two ago.

179 - > They upped the minimum, so that the SBA typically doesn't lend 180 - > more than 5 million, so your typical deal size is around 5.5 181 - > 6 million if you're doing SBA lending. Now they just upped it 182 - > to 10, so I don't know, man. We could see another aggregator 183 - > bubble.

I honestly feel like the ones coming. I feel like there's 184 - > going to be another attempt to roll up Amazon businesses this 185 - > time under the auspices of AI, right? 186 - > Narrator: Is your e-commerce business experiencing falling 187 - > revenue? Bluetuskr has helped many brands like yours excel.

188 - > Unlike other marketing partners, Bluetuskr leverages a team of 189 - > specialists to ensure every strategy is created and executed 190 - > toward your business growth. As an extension of your marketing 191 - > team, Bluetuskr prides itself on helping to fill in the gaps and 192 - > develop strong omni-channel strategies to diversify your 193 - > business from the rest. Ready to scale your marketing 194 - > initiatives? Visit their website, bluetuskr.

com that's B 195 - > L U E T U S K r.com 196 - > Andrew Maff: So, someone, someone great once told me, and 197 - > I think his name was Paul, that you should still have a lawyer 198 - > before you go to a distributor, someone that's actually, you 199 - > know, obviously helping you sell a business, that was you, by the 200 - > way, it was you that told me this, or broker, sorry, damn it. 201 - > So, what's the.. so I guess that makes no sense.

I would imagine 202 - > that that is a common thing that brands don't think about. Am I 203 - > correct? 204 - > Paul Rafelson: Yeah, I mean, I think I think there's some great 205 - > brokers out there that do a good job, some, some less so, but 206 - > yeah, when you go to sell your business, and you're going to 207 - > market one, you know, you want to look at, you know, if you're 208 - > under a million and a half, 2 million in SDE, you're probably 209 - > going to work with a broker, you're probably not going to 210 - > work with a banker, but you know, once you start to go 211 - > around 2 million or so, give or take, you know, you maybe you 212 - > want to work with a banker, it's a whole different world, but the 213 - > biggest thing, regardless of who you work with, is, and this is 214 - > what I've seen in the broker contracts that bothers me, is 215 - > things like if you walk away from an LOI, you still owe us 216 - > our commission, right, which is crazy, right, so like you get 217 - > the letter of intent, which is the sort of the start, the 218 - > kickoff of the M and A process of selling or acquiring your 219 - > business, right?

220 - > It's a long, long way away. I always say a letter of intent is 221 - > like negotiating the price. When you negotiate the full purchase 222 - > documents, we're actually doing a risk negotiation. We're 223 - > identifying these areas of risk and assigning, signing it to 224 - > among the parties and dividing it up among the parties, and 225 - > that's what really the complexity of M and A is about.

226 - > I know everybody's trying to do their own M and A on Claude, but 227 - > it's like they kind of missed the underlying context, which is 228 - > this is really about risk management. It's not about some 229 - > boilerplate document that just needs to be signed. It's nothing 230 - > like that. These documents are harsh.

231 - > So kind of going back to your point, the brokers have their 232 - > documents too, and you want to know when you're working with a 233 - > broker that's the right fit for you, that's right fit for your 234 - > industry, and when you sign a document with them, you want to 235 - > make sure that you're not going to be in any situation where 236 - > you're kind of overly locked in. 237 - > So, for example, I might negotiate my broker contracts 238 - > differently than the default, where it says, you know, anybody 239 - > that we contact, you're not allowed to contact, or if you 240 - > sell to them in the next three years, even if you're not 241 - > exclusive with us, you have to give us a commission, right, 242 - > because we contacted them first.

243 - > So, like, for example, for my clients, I would negotiate that 244 - > differently. I say, look, you can't just box my client out 245 - > because you're doing a lousy job after you emailed 1000 people 246 - > with an email, you know, at an email distribution list. That 247 - > doesn't, that's not fair. That means if you do a crappy job, my 248 - > client's locked in for three years.

What I will accept is if 249 - > the people respond to your email like they actually looked at it 250 - > and respond and say, I want to know more, you know, we can 251 - > count that as a, as a, you know, your, as your efforts, but I 252 - > don't necessarily know if I would just count your email 253 - > distribution list as being purely your efforts, but most 254 - > importantly, I think is those definitions of success that they 255 - > use, which again oftentimes aren't success, right?

Like a 256 - > letter of intent is a long, long, long way away from a 257 - > closed deal and getting paid if you're selling a business. So to 258 - > say that you would owe your broker a brokerage fee if you 259 - > walk away from a letter of intent is it's bad. You could be 260 - > owing your broker, you know, six figures or more for having 261 - > really not done anything for you, just because you walked 262 - > away from a letter of intent, so you know again, you want your 263 - > lawyer there to sort of negotiate those terms and say, 264 - > look, I'm going to do whatever my lawyer advises, and I'm not 265 - > going to be penalized for it, right, if my lawyer and I think 266 - > this is a bad deal, I'm not going to, you know, have to 267 - > worry about your commission is a way to, as a way to sort of 268 - > force me to taking this deal that I think is a bad deal.

So 269 - > those are just kind of examples of things that I think about 270 - > that. Yes, even at the broker level, it's a good time. 271 - > Plus, you want to have a plan, right? You want to, you know, 272 - > the brokers are typically like real estate agents, like a lot 273 - > of them are going to just tell you.

What you want here, so 274 - > you'll push the deal forward. 275 - > They don't care what happens to you after the deal closes. They 276 - > get paid, they get their commission, and they're gone. 277 - > They don't care about whether or not you're going to get earned 278 - > out.

I hate to say there's a lot of them don't like it's just a 279 - > reality. It's our job to kind of help you through that process. 280 - > So, like, again, you should be, you know, the lawyer you hire in 281 - > this process, the only person you're hiring, it's really going 282 - > to have to have your, your full interest at heart, like we're 283 - > legally required to have your best interest at heart. That's 284 - > why I don't do things on success fees.

285 - > That's why we do hourly billing, because if, if my getting paid 286 - > was determinative of your deal closing, there's a consideration 287 - > that that's an ethical quandary, if you will, because I may tell 288 - > you, you know, I wouldn't never do this, but, like, the idea is 289 - > that lawyer might advise you to take a deal, probably not a 290 - > great deal, because that's the only way they're getting paid, 291 - > they just sell that work, so we just do hourly, and, but I think 292 - > it is, it's so this is the biggest transaction of people's 293 - > lives, you know, in most, I don't know any client I've 294 - > worked with in this space who said I've done something bigger, 295 - > unless they're just a serial, you know, private, you know, one 296 - > Andrew Maff: if of those folks, but for most of 297 - > our Amazon seller and e-commerce clients, this, these selling 298 - > your business is the biggest transaction I ran into, so it's 299 - > not the time to go cheap, it's, 300 - > Paul Rafelson: it's a non-recurring charge, right?

301 - > you know, you may have gotten this far by going cheap on your 302 - > You're trying to say, look, this stuff is sort of non-recurring, 303 - > legal and whatnot, but, but selling your business is not, 304 - > because it can get really nasty if you sign the wrong documents, 305 - > or it's extraordinary, right? 306 - > Like, I bought a G wagon for my if you're not figuring, so you 307 - > can, you can all the money you got paid, you could end up owing 308 - > more than that back to the, to business because I saw a TikTok 309 - > video about it, right, like it the south, to the buyer, right?

310 - > You could be paid a million doesn't mean that you're that's 311 - > real. Oh, no, no, that's real. 312 - > dollars, and the buyer could have the right to claim 313 - > unlimited funds from you for the damages that they have. So, it's 314 - > That happens, or where I get my boat, I deduct my botox, which, 315 - > really, you know, people do need to understand that this, this M 316 - > and A stuff is serious, but you know it's great, you know, but 317 - > just not the time to go alone, you know.

318 - > you know, I look, if you think you can make a case for that, 319 - > I'm not going to get into deductions and whatnot. 320 - > There are plenty of people out there who can talk about that, 321 - > but if that's something you want to do, like, you should feel 322 - > fine. You should be able to do that, you know, barring the tax 323 - > advice side of things. You should be able to do that and 324 - > the way we don't penalize you for doing things like that is by 325 - > doing these sort of add-backs, where we take and take out 326 - > things that don't really belong, like, you know, I'm not buying 327 - > your car, so the $300,000 expense of the G wagon is 328 - > something that you would probably add back, because I'm 329 - > not buying the car right, and it's not part of a normal PNL 330 - > for a business, unless you're in the G Wagon business of some 331 - > kind.

332 - > So it is, it is, but you know the other discretionaries can be 333 - > things like, you know, you launch a product and in January, 334 - > so you spent three or four times the normal PPC required to 335 - > maintain it just to do a launch. 336 - > Well, I would argue that, that you know, if I have 12 months of 337 - > data and three of those months were the launch months, I would 338 - > normalize those, right? Want to normalize those. If you've paid 339 - > a lot of tariffs and those tariffs are now 340 - > unconstitutional, right, you're getting them back, right?

That's 341 - > going to affect your SD. You want to do a tariff adjustment, 342 - > so there's.. you know, the add-back concept is, is kind 343 - > of.. it is based on this idea of like extraordinary and 344 - > non-recurring basis.

It's not just sort of this arbitrary 345 - > thing where you add back, you know, what you feel like, like, 346 - > oh, he doesn't need 10 VAs, or you know, it's a little bit more 347 - > structure around that thought process, but yeah, I mean, once 348 - > you add and take care of all those ad backs and everything 349 - > that you know, whatever you get to that number, assuming the 350 - > other side agrees, I would say 3x is about what you would see, 351 - > you know, for like a healthier above half a million dollar 352 - > profit company, right?

If you're, if you're doing like 353 - > 200,000 profit, 250 like you could be looking at, like, a 2x 354 - > closing cash deal easily, so you know, once you kind of get over 355 - > that 500 to 600,000 threshold, you tend to start to see 3x pop 356 - > around more often, and then that kind of really seems to hang, 357 - > unless you have something special, in which case we can 358 - > bring you to, then this is where, again, considering a 359 - > broker versus a banker. A banker will really look at your 360 - > business, it's going to cost you a lot more in the long run.

It's 361 - > the idea is it'll make you a lot more, because you shall, you 362 - > should hopefully sell at a higher price, but there's a 363 - > little bit more you know bankers are really more expensive than 364 - > just kind of go into a broker, but if you have a unique 365 - > product, you know what's the one that sold to Unilever, you know, 366 - > Dollar Shave Club sells to Unilever, right? Like, you know, 367 - > if Dollar Shave Club just went to a random broker and got, you 368 - > know, 4x that wouldn't have been as good a deal as what they got 369 - > from Unilever.

370 - > So, sometimes, if you're the right fit for the right company, 371 - > you need a broker or a banker that understands your industry 372 - > and can find you those deals and will not just put you out to the 373 - > general public to be bid on at, you know, 3x multiples, which is 374 - > generally what we say in those cases, but that's what we call a 375 - > strategic acquisition, and those do take more time, but certainly 376 - > something to consider as well. 377 - > Andrew Maff: Yeah, Paul, super interesting.

This was this was 378 - > great. I really appreciate this, because all these, every almost 379 - > every episode I've ever had is always about like the minutia of 380 - > the brand running the day to day, like the you're in the 381 - > thick of it, and this is this is all very interesting insight 382 - > into the end game, like what happens at the end, what are you 383 - > dealing with, what could you get? This was awesome, I really 384 - > appreciate it. We'll definitely have to do this again, but I'd 385 - > love to give you the floor, tell everybody where they can find 386 - > out more about you and more about Rafelson Law.

387 - > Paul Rafelson: Sure, no, I appreciate that. Yeah, no, feel 388 - > free to bring me on, we can always talk about the high level 389 - > stuff, you know, we see a lot in this world, everything from Prop 390 - > 65 to compliance to IP, it's a fun world. 391 - > You can find me at ecom.law, a c o m dot l a w, Rafelson Law is, 392 - > or rafflesenlaw.

com ecom dot law is our main law firm. And then I 393 - > also own a company called Seller Basics. Seller Basics is like 394 - > account health, it's like imagine if somebody came up with 395 - > health insurance for your Amazon account, that's what Seller 396 - > Basics is. It's an account health service, so that if your 397 - > ASIN ever goes down or your account ever gets suspended, any 398 - > type of trouble with Amazon on the account health front, as a 399 - > subscribing member to Seller Basics, you get free help.

400 - > So it's unlimited help for as long as you're a member, right? 401 - > So it's like insurance, right? 402 - > You got to be a member before the bad thing happens, so long 403 - > as you're a member before the bad thing happens, and you 404 - > maintain your membership anytime something bad happens with 405 - > Amazon, we help you get reinstated. We have the ability 406 - > to escalate it up to legal.

407 - > There's no extra charges when we do those escalations internally 408 - > within Amazon. And then you also get free legal consults. You 409 - > ever just want a lawyer on call that knows your business, you 410 - > can have that too. And that's part of the, as part of the 411 - > membership, I think it's like 200 bucks a month or something, 412 - > it's not a ton, but it's it's sellerbasics.

com, I created 413 - > that, we created that right around the start of the 414 - > pandemic, and literally thought it was gonna fail, and it's 415 - > right out the door, because we like, like a week or two after 416 - > the launch, we're in lockdown. 417 - > Like what's going happen this whole industry, but then we had 418 - > price gouging cases and all sorts of crazy stuff, and we 419 - > found our stride and ended up getting a lot of people, and you 420 - > know, Seller Basics is a great, it's a whole separate team, ex 421 - > Amazon, ex sellers, and they all do a great job, they understand 422 - > the account health, they understand the policy, and so 423 - > check them out at Sellerbasics.

com that's my other 424 - > company, and yeah, if you want to email me, Paul@ecom.law, just 425 - > feel free to email me. Love, love hearing from people. 426 - > Andrew Maff: Beautiful, Paul.

427 - > Thank you so much. Obviously, everyone that tuned in, thank 428 - > you as well. Please make sure 429 - > you do the usual thing: rate, review, subscribe, all that fun 430 - > stuff, and whichever podcast platform you prefer, or head 431 - > over to the ecommshow.com to check out all of our previous 432 - > episodes.

But, as usual, thank you all for joining us, and 433 - > we'll see you all next time. 434 - > Have a good 435 - > Narrator: Thank you for tuning in to the Ecomm show. Head over 436 - > to ecommshow.com to subscribe on your favorite podcast platform 437 - > or on the Bluetuskr YouTube channel.

The ecomm show is 438 - > brought to you by Bluetuskr, a full service digital marketing 439 - > company specifically for e-commerce sellers looking to 440 - > accelerate their growth, go to BlueTuskr.com now for more 441 - > information. Make sure to tune in next week for another amazing 442 - > episode of The Ecomm Show!

Related episodes across the Index

Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.

  • 0049 - How He Bought a $3M Business With Almost No Money DownBusiness Buying for Financial Independence · on SBA lending90 / 100
  • From Software to Concrete Cutting (and $1.4m of SDE)Acquiring Minds · on SBA lending79 / 100
  • Diamond Innabi - SaaS M&A 101: Selling Your Software CompanyCloud Returns · on letter of intent (LOI)73 / 100
  • 158: Wendell Santiago - The Action-Oriented ApproachSalesology® · on SBA lending66 / 100
  • What a CFO Does to Maximize Business Exit Value with Robert Checchia (#81)Exit Algorithms · on Valuation multiples65 / 100
  • Why Imperfect Action Trumps Perfect InactionThe New F*Word · on Valuation multiples62 / 100

More from The E-Comm Show

All episodes →
  • How to Protect Your Brand on Amazon Before It Costs You Millions | EP. #234
  • Why Most Amazon Ad Accounts Are Overcomplicated (And Quietly Burning Budget) | EP. #233
  • Why Brands Keep Killing Ads That Are Actually Working | EP. #232
  • Why Amazon Keeps Raising Fees…And What Sellers Need to Do Next | EP. #231
  • Why Success in One Market Fails in the Next with Woowind | EP. #230
Explore the best B2B Marketing podcasts →
All The E-Comm Show episodes →