The B2B Podcast Index
Index
All categories
MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
MethodologySubmit
Best of:MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
An independent project byFame
SearchBest episodesGuestsInsightsMethodologySubmit a podcast
Index/AI & Data/AI Security, Cyber Risk, and Cloud Strategy on ClearTech Loop
AI Security, Cyber Risk, and Cloud Strategy on ClearTech Loop artwork

AI Security: Todd Smith on Shadow AI, NHIs, and AI Defense

AI Security, Cyber Risk, and Cloud Strategy on ClearTech Loop · 2026-04-29 · 16 min

0:00--:--

Key moments - from our scoring

Substance score

56 / 100

Five dimensions, 20 points each

Insight Density12 / 20
Originality10 / 20
Guest Caliber14 / 20
Specificity & Evidence9 / 20
Conversational Craft11 / 20

Todd Smith brings two decades of cybersecurity leadership to discuss three critical AI security challenges facing financial institutions. On shadow AI, he reframes it as a partnership issue rather than a blocking problem - security owns the risk while IT owns the infrastructure, and both must collaborate to enable safe AI use rather than create a "department of no." He emphasizes the scale of non-human identities (NHIs) in enterprises, noting estimates of 10-60 NHIs per human employee, making discovery and governance the foundational challenge. Smith stresses the importance of knowing your environment, implementing AI gradually through a "dimmer switch" approach rather than full deployment, and educating employees as the weakest link in any security posture. His perspective on AI defense focuses on defending against internal AI risks first - ensuring proper guardrails, security protocols, and NHI controls - before addressing external AI threats. This conversation is essential for CISOs, security leaders, and IT directors managing rapid AI adoption in regulated industries like banking, where the traditional "no" approach to emerging technology can cost talent, customers, and competitive advantage.

Key takeaways

  • →Shadow AI requires collaboration between security (risk ownership) and IT (control infrastructure) rather than siloed approaches, and attempts to block all AI tools will fail because employees and adversaries will find workarounds.
  • →NHI discovery and governance is foundational; enterprises must first know what non-human identities exist (estimated at 10-60 per human employee), then implement continuous cleanup alongside prevention of new sprawl.
  • →A "dimmer switch" approach to AI deployment - scaling gradually while monitoring - reduces blind spots and enables security to maintain visibility throughout implementation rather than learning about shadow use retroactively.
  • →Employee education framed as the "Department of Education" rather than "Department of No" is critical because customers service reps and bankers prioritize their core jobs, not security, and need backing from security teams rather than restrictions.
  • →AI defense starts internally by securing your own AI systems' guardrails, access controls, and NHI permissions before defending against external AI-enabled threats.

Guests

Todd Smith

Topics in this episode

shadow AIGeminiClaudeChatGPTMicrosoft CopilotThreat Intelligenceidentity and access management (IAM)Non-human identities (NHIs)AI DefenseNetwork Security

Questions this episode answers

Should shadow AI be treated as an IT problem or a security problem?

Both - security must own the risk (data leakage, IP loss, regulatory breaches) while IT owns the controls (network visibility, browser blocking, API management, firewalls). Siloing the responsibility in one department causes both departments to fail.

How many non-human identities does a typical enterprise have?

Estimates range from 10 NHIs per human employee to 50-60 NHIs per employee, depending on company size and historical accumulation, making discovery rather than cleanup the immediate priority.

What's the best approach to deploying AI securely in a regulated environment?

Use a "dimmer switch" approach - scale AI gradually rather than full deployment, maintain visibility throughout implementation, and align on risk tolerance before rolling out to all employees.

Why is blocking AI tools like ChatGPT ineffective as a security strategy?

Employees will find alternative tools (Claude, Gemini) or use personal accounts, resulting in uncontrolled data exfiltration outside the company's security infrastructure, making enable-with-governance more effective than blocking.

What does AI defense mean in practice?

First defend against internal AI risks by controlling guardrails, NHI access, and data visibility; then defend against external AI-enabled threats - internal governance is the foundation before addressing external threats.

What our scoring noted

Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.

Insight Density

12 / 20

The episode contains some substantive security thinking, particularly around shadow AI governance and the IT/security partnership model, but relies heavily on familiar concepts (defense-in-depth, employee training, risk awareness) and lacks concrete metrics or novel frameworks. Most insights are restatements of established security principles rather than non-obvious claims a seasoned operator would learn.

security owns the risk and it owns the infrastructure and how to make it work
you've got to know what you have. You've got to know your environment

Originality

10 / 20

The thinking is competent but conventional. The core thesis - that security should enable rather than block AI, that shadow AI requires IT/security collaboration, that you must inventory before securing - is the consensus view in 2024 security leadership. The framing lacks contrarian or first-principles depth; the Terminator/Skynet reference is metaphorical but not analytically novel.

security folks, CISOs, CSOs, they need to think about enabling AI and working with it and not blocking it
you've got to really figure out how to thread the needle of clean up the historical clean up the present

Guest Caliber

14 / 20

Todd Smith has legitimate operational pedigree: 20+ years in cybersecurity, SVP at Ameris Bank managing ~27 direct reports, prior roles at Sofi, Barclays, Citi, and the FBI, with a $2.7M budget across US/EMEA. He is a practitioner at scale in regulated financial services. However, the discussion itself does not demonstrate tactical depth or specific institutional knowledge beyond what a generalist security executive would offer.

SVP and director of customer I am and threat intelligence at Ameris bank
more than 20 years of experience working at companies like Sofi, Barclays, Citi and the FBI

Specificity & Evidence

9 / 20

The episode lacks concrete data, named case studies, or quantified examples. References to shadow AI multipliers (10x to 60x NHIs per employee) are attributed vaguely to 'estimates' without sources. No specific incidents, metrics, or timelines ground the discussion; most claims remain abstract and generalizable.

I've seen some estimates, you know, for every human employee, there's 10 NHIS go up to maybe 50, even 60
I've seen some really crazy start dates on NHS

Conversational Craft

11 / 20

Jo asks reasonable topical questions and invites reflection, but does not press for specifics, challenge claims, or dig into contradictions. The host accepts Smith's framing without follow-up (e.g., no probe on how to actually measure 50x NHI bloat or operationalize the 'dimmer switch' model). The conversation is friendly but surfaces-level, missing opportunities to extract concrete guidance.

I'm interested to hear what you're hearing from your peers about addressing shadow AI in their environments
when you hear the term AI defense, what comes to mind for you?

Conversation analysis

Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.

Most-used words

security23back11help8customer6first6everybody6forward6question5block5department5seen5employees5banking5different5clean5defense5

Episode notes

What does AI security actually look like inside real organizations? In this episode of ClearTech Loop, Jo Peterson talks with Todd Smith, SVP and Director of Customer IAM and Threat Intelligence at Ameris Bank, about shadow AI, non human identities, and what AI defense looks like in environments where identity, fraud, and security are tightly connected. They unpack why shadow AI is both an IT and security issue, why blocking AI tools is not a long term strategy, and how organizations are trying to bring more visibility and control to environments where AI adoption is already happening across teams. Todd explains how shadow AI creates real risk through data leakage, IP exposure, and regulatory pressure, especially when employees turn to unapproved tools to move faster. The conversation also highlights the role of training, as organizations shift from simply restricting behavior to helping employees understand how to use AI safely. The discussion then moves to non human identities, where Todd describes the operational challenge of managing identities that do not follow a clean lifecycle.

Full transcript

16 min

Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.

Jo, Hey y'all, thank you so much for being with us. This is clear tech loop. We're on the move and in the know. I'm Jo Peterson.

I'm the CIO of clarify 360 and the chief analyst at Clear Tech Research. Y'all know me, but you may not know Mr. Todd Smith, who is the SVP and director of customer I am and threat intelligence at Ameris bank. Hi Todd.

Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for having me. Thank you for taking time to visit. If you're not following Todd, you probably should be, because he's a seasoned cybersecurity executive with more than 20 years of experience working at companies like Sofi, Barclays, Citi and the FBI, he currently manages seven direct reports and 20 indirect reports.

So he's a little busy little bit, and he's got a global $2.7 million budget across the US and EMEA. So again, back to the little busy if you're new to cleartech loop. The podcast is a hot tech approach, and we're focused on cyber security, cloud security and AI security.

And we each we each week, I should say we each We ask our guests three questions, and they're of the moment, right? So we all know AI, security is changing as quick as we can think about it. This is just a take of the moment. So let me get going with that.

Let me ask the first question. Todd, give give me your thinking around shadow. Ai, is it an IT problem? A security problem, both, neither?

Well, I'll give you probably the easy answer, and just say both, you know, kind of puts it in everybody's wheelhouse, but at the end of the day, you know, it's something that everybody needs to be aware of when you're bringing AI into your environments, and why it's a both. Problem is security is going to own the risk there. You've got data leakage, you got IP loss, regulatory breaches. However, within those environments, it is the one that owns those controls.

They're the ones with network available, network visibility, browser blocking capabilities. They're running, the API management, the firewalls. You can't isolate and silo the this issue, because if you do, that's where everything breaks down. You've got to have that constant communication across these teams.

Granted, you should have constant communication across these teams anyway, but when you're specifically looking at AI, you're going to miss the mark if you kind of are putting it in one block or the other, because then, you know, you become a department of no as a security professional, because you're going to say, no, no, we can't do that. No, no, we can't do that. No, no, we can't do that. So if you bring in the IT group, they can say, well, you know, we can, we can formulate this answer.

We can, you know, craft this posture. We can do this, that and the other, to make sure that this is a good solution, that is secure, safe, and get the job done for the company. There's been a bit of a vibe shift when it comes to that, I've seen, especially within my own company, you know, it's kind of figuring out who owned that. I think that's kind of the model we've introduced, is where security owns the risk and it owns the infrastructure and how to make it work.

So, you know, it's something that is really speaking to a lot of like you mentioned today. It's from a strategy standpoint, something that needs to happen because it's going to enable businesses to move forward. And if you're the one that doesn't do the AI, you're probably going to be left behind from the others who are doing it. So specifically security folks, CISOs, CSOs, they need to think about enabling AI and working with it and not blocking it, because you're not going to be able to block it forever.

Eventually, something's going to happen, and it's going to come through, whether you want it to or not. Got adversaries using it, your employees are going to start using it on their own, which is the worst example of any of any of them. You definitely don't want that going on because you're losing sight of your own data at that point, because it's going into an unapproved AI, maybe outside of your environment, they're copy pasting whatever it is screenshots. It's just a risk, so you need to basically enable them to use it in a safe and secure environment.

That way it can also push the benefit, which then moves business forward and from every business I've ever worked for, mostly in the banking sector, that's what we want to see, is that move forward, if you don't, if you try to fight against it, say you're going to lose employees, you're going to lose customers, you're going to lose business, and then you're going to be looking for a job. That's fair. And I mean, look, you have peers in the industry, and we all talk to each other.

I'm interested to hear what you're hearing from your peers about addressing shadow AI in their environments. How are they dealing with it? You know, that's that's an interesting take, because especially in financial services and banking, we all have. Such different environments.

Yes, we're all kind of the same thing. We're all banking industries, but our are all so different. Our different our core banking systems are different. You're either using third party or proprietary.

It's all over the place. So how do you do it? How's the best way to structure it? It first, as with anything in this world, is knowing what you got, know your environment, know how to do it, know where you're going to be.

You know, placing AI at the beginning, because you can't manage what you can't manage. So simply, gotta think of it as like a light switch. You're going to not going to flip the light switch on full blast. You're going to have a dimmer switch slowly, see how it works, scaling it up as it goes, and making sure you know that you don't shine a light too bright.

And then everyone's kind of blinded. That also goes to the enablement, because then you can kind of walk into the walk into the relationship, walk into the implementation, and know where it works, and kind of keep your eye on what's going on. You know, Shadow IOI at the end of the day isn't going to be necessarily malicious. There's a lot of ended like I said, kind of going back to like, if you block chat, GPT, well, did you block Claude, right?

Gemini, did you write every single one of them? You know? And you know, they pop up constantly. You know, a lot of companies now are at least having some semblance of copilot within them, but you got to remember which tab you're in, because there's a work tab and a web tab where you're putting the data into each that's something you mostly need to keep keep track of there, too.

But again, it kind of goes back to the implementing, working through everything, working with everybody, working with the technology. Because at the end of the day, if you block it, they'll find a way. It's kind of like Dr Malcolm says in Jurassic Park, nature finds a way. Employees find a way.

And you know what you're saying? So important, because I remember when email security was starting to be a thing, right? And forward thinking security folks said, You know what? We need, employee training on this, right?

We need and so I see that there's an opportunity in the market for AI security training, right? I see that that's going to be an important because people don't know. Sometimes they just they they're not trying to do something wrong. They just don't realize they're doing something wrong, just like in on a bad email, right?

It just we didn't know back in the day. You know that and right? So I think that what you said was really important about, it's just as much about, I don't see security anymore as the Department of No, I see it sometimes as the Department of Education. Yes, I think that's a phenomenal way to put it.

You know, especially in banking, financial services, everything's highly regulated, so there's a lot of web based training. You have to it annually. So, you know, stagger that approach make Don't bombard people with 35 web based trainings in the first two weeks of January. They're just going to click through it and nothing's going to unless you want to be really mean about it, and track the page, how time, how much time you're on each page, you know, I think I've been a part of companies that did that at my government, you know, and but there's some ways you got to do that, because you got to make sure that they get the training.

Because I didn't know, is not an answer. So, you know, I think the Department of Education is a great way of putting it, because at the end of the day, you have to educate people about security. We have to educate our employees, our frontline staff, our bankers. And at the end of the day, we've really, really got to educate our customers, because any security procedure or policy that we put into place, the weakest part of that is going to be the human aspect of it.

Obviously, as systems, we can secure those pretty well and at the end of the day, but the human aspect is where it is and, well, yes, I've already said, you know, I didn't know. Is not an excuse, but sometimes it's the actual truth. Not everybody's No, not everybody's gonna we think about security every all day, every day, right? But not everybody in any company thinks about security all day, every day.

You know, you've got customer service reps. They want to help the customer, because that's what they do, and they do it well, especially at my bank, phenomenal customer service. They want to help the customer every day. That can be leveraged.

You've got bankers who you know, they can help you whatever you need to do whenever you have financial hardships. They can help you through the toughest times of your life, they're not thinking about security, no about customer service, and that's their priority, and that and that that has to be true for for us to flourish. So we've got to be able to back them up as a security department and help them understand and help them be able to pass that message on. Yeah, that's a good way to because in their kindness, they could get exploited.

Yes, right? I can see that, yeah, we fishing tests not to catch you off. Jo, I've seen fishing tests where they come back and say, well, that's that's too harsh of a fishing test. That's fine, but the bad guys are going to be probably harsher.

So it's okay, yeah, and it's just a test. It's okay, right? It's just a test to figure out where we are, right? So that's that's an important point of the two, because if you don't test, you're not going to know exactly I was super excited to talk to you, especially with the second question, because, given your role, I think this is something that every security person that I'm talking to is grappling with, NHS, right?

Holy cow, that's that's a nice way of putting it. I mean, right? Yeah, it's one of those things that, you know, it goes back to the beginning of just really computers. At the end of the day, I've seen some really crazy start dates on NHS.

It's, it's just, it's wild, because I think I've seen some estimates, you know, for every human employee, there's 10 NHIS go up to maybe 50, even 60, because you think I'm on you on board, you work. You leave, right, where's the cleaning crew to go in there and go through and clean every single NHI that you've ever made, ever made in your one year, or your 25 years of being an employee. It's, it's crazy. And this kind of goes back to the first question is, you know, AI in general, that could be a good way to help, help leverage this, send those, send that in there, and try to clean everything up.

It's one of those things that are we too far down the road with NHI is to really have a clean house. Some of these companies might be if you've got hundreds of 1000s of employees, and then your times in that by 50 like it's going to be a task. But you know, at the at the end of the day, it's, it's a reality, and the discovery is what you really need to focus on. I've kind of been a been a thread through this whole conversation so far.

Jo is, you've got to know what you have. You've got to know, right? And at the end of the day, one of my biggest things, and I kind of cut my teeth in my beginning of my career as an intelligence professional, I don't know what I don't know. So all you can really do is the best you can with those NHIS identify as many as you can figure out a way that's good for your company and good for your risk tolerance.

Go find them. You know, do some hunts, go get them. They're out there. And then, you know how you want to triage those moving forward, you've got to stop the bleeding and then prevent the bleeding, because if you're just, if you're catching everything on the back end, that's old, okay, but now you're adding to it every, every day, every month, when people leave, you're kind of, you're you're cleaning it up, but it's still getting messy, so you've got to really figure out how to thread the needle of clean up the historical clean up the present.

Yeah, interesting, I mean, interesting problem and not easily solved. Last question that I have for you, when you hear the term AI defense, what comes to mind for you? Oh, there's so many ways you can look at this, however, kind of perspective you want. It's such a big question, which you know is great for a podcast.

You know, how do you look at it is, is AI your defense? You know, is AI coming at you. And so, you know, like, how do you look at a AI defense? Are you defending with or are you defending the AI day?

You know? So for me, specifically, when I look at AI defense, because probably at the stage we are, and what I've seen more recently is it's going to be the AI within. So I've always kind of used the the term, you know, we don't want it to Sky net, you know, to date myself as a terminator fan, you know, we don't want to inject AI into one area. And the guardrails are a little lax.

The security protocols on it are lacks and it's spreading, yeah, you know, so we don't want it to Skynet. So that's really AI defense. That's how I think of it. First again, it goes back.

You got to know what you have. You got to keep your own house in order first. Because if I've got aI inside, what is that leveraging? What is it looking at?

How is is it exfiltrating? Anything? Right? Oh, what's going on in your house?

So really, you're kind of defending against your own AI to start, that's where you need to build your foundation, leverage it inside. Know what's going on, how it's working, what it's doing, where it's looking. One of. Of things too for that, NHIS.

What is it doing with NHIS? Are they communicating what's going on there? How are people accessing and leveraging the AI? Are they allowed to access what they're allowed to access through AI?

Or can they sneak over in another area and pull data? Really, it's defending the AI within, and then after that, you got to defend the AI from without which that is what we're talking about, the security part, the shield, if you will, and because AI threats coming at you are coming daily. Yeah, that's true. So so many good things.

I hope you'll come back and visit with us again, because this is an evolving conversation. Obviously we're all just sort of learning how to deal with stuff, and the playbook for traditional security is a little bit different than this, right? Just is. So, yeah, 100% so thank you so much for your time and looking forward to chatting with you again.

Thank you, Jo, appreciate having me.

Related episodes across the Index

Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.

  • Wins Above Replacement: The New Way to Judge FoundersVenture Unlocked · on ChatGPT88 / 100
  • Paul Graham On Startups, Ambition, and Great FoundersY Combinator Startup Podcast · on ChatGPT88 / 100
  • The AI-Native Law Firm, with Ryan Walker of General LegalMeeting of the Minds · on Claude88 / 100
  • Adamma Ihemeson on Building Autonomous AI Systems You Can TrustBack on T-R-A-C-K · on Claude84 / 100
  • 657. Waziri Garuba, CEO of Harlem Labs, Introducing G.R.I.O.TUnleashed · on Claude80 / 100
  • Unresolved.cx - When Feedback Has To Matter - Paul TuckerUnresolved.cx · on Claude80 / 100

More from AI Security, Cyber Risk, and Cloud Strategy on ClearTech Loop

All episodes →
  • Derek Fisher on AI Governance, AI Agents & MCP Risk60 / 100
  • The USB Problem for AI: Phil Stafford on Agents, Governance, and MCP Risk84 / 100
  • AI Security: Gerald Auger on Shadow AI, Non Human Identities, and AI Defense84 / 100
  • AI Security: Patricia Titus on Shadow AI, Non-Human Identities, and AI Defense79 / 100
  • ClearTech Loop Special Edition: Rethinking CDN Pricing with AWS CloudFront63 / 100
Explore the best B2B AI & Data podcasts →
All AI Security, Cyber Risk, and Cloud Strategy on ClearTech Loop episodes →