
The Unstoppable Marketer® · 2026-06-23 · 32 min
Key moments - from our scoring
Substance score
39 / 100
Five dimensions, 20 points each
This episode tackles the critical flaw in performance marketing: obsessive focus on ROAS (Return on Ad Spend) as the primary optimization metric. Mark argues that digital marketing has created an 'illusion of control' over the customer journey through attribution tools like Northbeam and Triple Whale, leading brands to make short-term emotional decisions that undermine long-term profitability. Using dollar-cost averaging (DCA) and long-term investing as analogies, he explains why brands should think in terms of contribution margin dollars and incrementality rather than cutting off campaigns based on temporary fluctuations. The pair discuss a client case where increasing ad spend by 15% weekly while accepting lower ROAS actually increased total profit dollars - a counterintuitive strategy most brands won't tolerate. The core issue: most e-commerce and DTC brands are 'fishing out of the bottom of the barrel' by only targeting ready-to-buy audiences, which increases competition and CAC every year. Meta's Andromeda algorithm scales ads for halo effect over time, not immediate ROAS, yet advertisers constantly kill top-funnel winners within 2-3 days. Without building the full funnel and manufacturing demand among new audiences, brands face unsustainable margin compression.
ROAS creates an illusion of control and causes brands to make emotional short-term decisions like cutting campaigns after 2-3 days when they actually need 7-14 days to work. It doesn't account for incrementality, halo effects, or the fact that platforms like Meta optimize for long-term scalability rather than immediate ROI.
Brands should measure contribution margin dollars (profit, not just revenue) and incrementality, similar to dollar-cost averaging in investing. This means accepting lower ROAS efficiency if total profit dollars are increasing - the true sign of sustainable growth.
When brands only target ready-to-buy audiences in the bottom funnel, they exhaust a finite pool of customers. Every brand then competes for the same shrinking audience, driving up CAC yearly and making the business increasingly difficult without building new demand in the top funnel.
Top-funnel campaigns drive engagement and qualified traffic but may not show immediate conversions, so advertisers kill them within 2-3 days thinking they don't work. But Meta's algorithm is actually spending money on them because they're algorithmically sound, and they often show real uplift after 7-14 days.
Both require a long-term plan and emotional discipline: you don't panic-sell stocks when they dip, and you shouldn't cut ad campaigns because of temporary performance dips. Consistent investment over time in both yield better results than reactive emotional decisions.
Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.
There are a handful of genuinely useful ideas - the 'meta-optimised market' narrowing TAM to purchase-ready signals, the central limit theorem applied to ad performance distributions, and using lead KPIs (CPC, through-plays, bounce rate) over lagging conversion rate - but they are buried under extended investing analogies, camping small-talk, and platitudes. Density per minute is low, and the core thesis (invest in top funnel, don't chase short-term ROAS) is familiar territory.
meta within their targeting audience, yeah, it's reducing it all the way down to the people they have identified who are ready to purchase within their optimization windows
you need to skew over into top funnel the bigger you get
The 'meta-optimised market' framing and the central limit theorem reference are mildly non-standard ways to talk about common problems, but the DCA/dollar-cost-averaging analogy to advertising patience and the Coca-Cola/Bud Light brand-awareness example are extremely well-worn. The overall contrarian premise (ROAS is misleading) is now a mainstream D2C take, not a fresh one.
This is called a meta-optimized market
digital marketing has created an illusion of control over the customer funnel
This is a two-host show with no external guest; both hosts appear to be agency practitioners with real client accounts, which is relevant but not high-calibre. Past guests like Alex MacArthur (former CMO, Purple) and Curtis Matsko (Portland Leather) are mentioned by name but are not present, so they cannot elevate the score.
I literally just got off, I mean, right before this podcast, I got off a phone with somebody who we increased their budgets massively and saw a hit in conversion rate this week
We've talked about this with uh Alex MacArthur, the former CMO over at Purple
There are some concrete elements - a client scaling spend 15% per week for two to three months with declining margin percentage but rising profit dollars, and a Poppy vs. Ollipop ROAS target comparison (3x vs. 1.5x) illustrating TAM reach differences - but neither client is named, the math is hypothetical ('just say 100 million for easy math'), and most claims are asserted without cited data or studies.
they have been increasing their ad spend by like 15% every week for the last, I don't know, two months, three months
Poppy comes out and says, we can only afford to have a three row as... And then Ollipop comes out and says, well, we can have a 1.5
Trevor asks a few genuine follow-ups ('You want to explain what you mean by that?', 'explain what you mean by a top funnel winner') and occasionally prompts elaboration, but the conversation is largely two hosts agreeing with each other, padded with personal small-talk. There is no pushback, no challenged claim, and several threads are dropped mid-sentence.
You want to explain what you mean by that?
Tell tell tell the audience like what is what is the what makes or breaks from what you've told me a day trader
Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.
Send us Fan Mail Are you making marketing decisions too quickly? In this episode of The Unstoppable Marketer®, Mark Goldhart and Trevor Crump explain why many brands are unknowingly sabotaging their growth by obsessing over ROAS, reacting to short-term data, and trying to control every variable in the customer journey. They break down why digital marketing has created an illusion of control, why top-of-funnel investment matters more than ever, and how the biggest brands win by consistently staying in front of customers over time. If you're constantly turning ads on and off, chasing efficiency metrics, or making emotional decisions based on a few bad days, this episode will completely change how you think about scaling a brand.
Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.
1 - > Mark: If you go into long term investing, it's like a DCA. 2 - > I think everyone's not everyone, but most people are familiar 3 - > with like dollar cost averaging into a stock or into an 4 - > investment where it's like, hey, you know what? 5 - > Like SpaceX just IPO'd. 6 - > I personally, not financial advice, will be DCAing into 7 - > SpaceX.
8 - > But there's times where, uh oh. 9 - > Now that and that's the big difference, right? 10 - > Like if you have a long-term plan with your investments, 11 - > you're not pulling out and getting scared just because a 12 - > stock goes down. 13 - > Digital marketing has created an illusion of control over the 14 - > customer funnel.
15 - > Like Coca-Cola was everywhere forever. 16 - > Beers, Budweiser, Bud Light. 17 - > Like, why are they advertised? 18 - > Everyone knows who they are.
19 - > Why are they always advertising on sports? 20 - > Ultimately, that's what advertising is. 21 - > It's supposed to build a consistent and predictable flow 22 - > of revenue in your business over time. 23 - > Trevor: Yo, what's going on, everybody?
24 - > Welcome to the Unstoppable Marketer Podcast. 25 - > With me, as always, is Mark Goldhart, who is on his phone. 26 - > As always, Mark, what's up? 27 - > What's up?
28 - > Who is my co-host, by the way? 29 - > This is your first time. 30 - > Just uh the coast of the unstoppable. 31 - > Checking in on the World Cup.
32 - > It's World Cup season. 33 - > Yep. 34 - > The United States. 35 - > Vamos Argentina.
36 - > Played well. 37 - > Argentina played well. 38 - > Mark: Played great. 39 - > Trevor: Yeah.
40 - > Mark: And I d I I will root for the States if we ever play 41 - > Argentina, but I just don't think we um What's going on? 42 - > Trevor: Summer? 43 - > You have a new baby? 44 - > Mark: Client work.
45 - > The newborn phase. 46 - > Um, yeah, client work. 47 - > Camping, fishing. 48 - > Is the season?
49 - > SPEAKER_02: Nice. 50 - > Mark: My kids camping a lot. 51 - > SPEAKER_02: Yeah, you have been, like on the weekends. 52 - > Mark: Gotta get them out of the house, you know?
53 - > Trevor: I've done nothing. 54 - > Mark: It's my it's my gift to my wife. 55 - > Yeah. 56 - > Get all my kids out of the house so she can spend time with the 57 - > newborn.
58 - > Trevor: That's very sweet and selfish of you at the same time, 59 - > huh? 60 - > It's like a sweet, selfish thing. 61 - > Mark: It's a win-win, is what it is. 62 - > Trevor: There you go.
63 - > That's better. 64 - > Mark: It's a win-win. 65 - > It's a win-win. 66 - > She wants me to do it.
67 - > Trevor: You're doing something for her. 68 - > And I get to go camping. 69 - > Yeah. 70 - > That is what they call a win-win.
71 - > Sweet. 72 - > Well. 73 - > Let's get into it. 74 - > Um, so quick quick c client win.
75 - > Right? 76 - > When I asked Mark, I'm like, what's the client win we want to 77 - > talk about? 78 - > Should we get sound effects? 79 - > Um one of the the thing he just said was like, he said staying 80 - > the course.
81 - > Like that was it. 82 - > And there's I think staying the course is gonna be the gonna go 83 - > in easily to our topic today, but I think one client when I 84 - > have is we have we have a client right now who is um they were a 85 - > smaller revenue client, but committed to um like really 86 - > understanding what their profitability numbers were. 87 - > So for every one dollar they spent, how much money were they 88 - > making, not just in revenue, but profitability, and how much 89 - > money did they make need to make in order to win?
90 - > And so it didn't matter how like what their ROAS might look like, 91 - > um, everything mattered to what their return on contribution 92 - > margin dollar was. 93 - > And so they have been increasing their ad spend by like 15% every 94 - > week for the last, I don't know, two months, three months. 95 - > Yeah. 96 - > Um and yes, efficiency continues to get smaller and smaller.
97 - > Well, yeah. 98 - > Mark: But profitability is rising, profit dollars are 99 - > accumulating. 100 - > Trevor: Profit margins have decreased, but profit margin 101 - > dollar has continued to increase, and it's been a really 102 - > cool thing to watch them not balk at a three-day lull or a 103 - > seven-day lull, you know, here and there. 104 - > Um, but they are trusting the process and understanding like 105 - > if they just stay the course, this is the red line, as long as 106 - > they stay the course, even though it might get really close 107 - > to it if they just keep going.
108 - > And that's been cool. 109 - > You don't see a lot of that. 110 - > Like a lot of people it's almost like you know, Mar Mark dabbles 111 - > in day trading. 112 - > Tell tell tell the audience like what is what is the what makes 113 - > or breaks from what you've told me a day trader.
114 - > Mark: Emotions. 115 - > Trevor: Explain it. 116 - > Mark: This is not financial advice. 117 - > Trevor: This is not financial advice across the This is not 118 - > financial advice.
119 - > Mark: If you ask me about the differences between day trading 120 - > and going to a casino, I don't really know. 121 - > So just it might be just gambling. 122 - > I don't know. 123 - > But if you're successful at it and if you're good at it and you 124 - > can be profitable at it, it usually means you have a plan, 125 - > you stick to the plan, and you simply don't let your losers 126 - > become too big and you let your winners win.
127 - > But you actually have to take the winners. 128 - > But yeah, it really comes down to not being emotional because 129 - > if you're emotional about the plan, and then you jump in too 130 - > early, you you leave too late. 131 - > But I think it's just I think it's just investing. 132 - > Like if you go into long-term investing, it's like a DCA.
133 - > I think everyone's not everyone, but most people are familiar 134 - > with like dollar cost averaging into a stock or into an 135 - > investment where it's like, hey, you know what? 136 - > Like SpaceX just I PO'd. 137 - > I personally, not financial advice, will be DCAing into 138 - > SpaceX over the next five to ten years. 139 - > SPEAKER_02: Yeah.
140 - > Mark: It'll go up and down during that time, but overall, 141 - > when you DCA, you go up. 142 - > SPEAKER_02: Right. 143 - > Mark: But there's times where, uh oh. 144 - > SPEAKER_02: Yeah.
145 - > Mark: Now that and that's the big difference, right? 146 - > Like if you have a long-term plan with your investments, 147 - > you're not pulling out and getting scared just because a 148 - > stock goes down. 149 - > Now, there, you know, there's other indicators that people 150 - > use, but like if you're just dollar cost averaging into the 151 - > NASDAQ or into, you know, the SP over time, like you're I mean, 152 - > the the data's there, the history is there. 153 - > The same thing with advertising.
154 - > I think people pull out of advertising the second the stock 155 - > goes down. 156 - > Yeah. 157 - > But it doesn't mean that there's like actually intrinsic evidence 158 - > that the advertising effort wasn't working. 159 - > Trevor: Or is no longer working.
160 - > Mark: Or is no longer, and that's always the delicate 161 - > balance with advertising, is digital marketing has created an 162 - > illusion of control over the customer funnel. 163 - > That's my hot take. 164 - > Trevor: You want to explain what you mean by that? 165 - > Mark: No, but I will.
166 - > Because we have attribution, everyone thinks that you can 167 - > meticulously plan and measure every step of a customer's 168 - > journey, and it's just not true. 169 - > SPEAKER_02: Yeah. 170 - > Mark: Now I'm not saying that measuring, you know, to the 171 - > north beams and the triple L's of the world. 172 - > We like we like people at both places, and you know, we look 173 - > really like a lot of the people at the and know the people at 174 - > the north beam office, is there's still a lot of value in 175 - > measuring attribution.
176 - > You can find value in it, but sometimes it creates this 177 - > illusion, like, well, okay, I need this X ROI on this ad, or 178 - > it gets turned off. 179 - > SPEAKER_02: Yeah. 180 - > Mark: When the the platforms don't even work that way, right? 181 - > So like meta is already with Andromeda and their updates.
182 - > It's gonna determine a winner within two or three days, and 183 - > it's going to scale the ad that is the most scalable. 184 - > Not necessarily that's gonna produce you the most ROI in that 185 - > given moment, but it's gonna give you the most halo effect 186 - > over time. 187 - > Yeah. 188 - > And that's what makes it difficult is like you have to 189 - > measure things, but too often people are cutting off their top 190 - > funnel winners.
191 - > And we can get into a debate around like, does it really 192 - > exist top funnel bot? 193 - > Like sure, sure. 194 - > Trevor: Maybe it's explain what you mean by a top funnel winner. 195 - > Mark: Top funnel.
196 - > Well, top funnel winner in meta is often gonna be something that 197 - > drives really great engagements, qualified traffic, but maybe not 198 - > buying. 199 - > So like reach? 200 - > Like a well, like, yeah, I mean that cost per reach might be 201 - > there, but just generally speaking, like if it's a video, 202 - > for example, you're gonna have good video metrics, so hook 203 - > rates, through plays, you can measure through plays, or you 204 - > can measure completion rates, whatever you want to do.
205 - > There's other ways of doing it. 206 - > Um but ultimately the good uh like the leading indicator is 207 - > that meta wants to spend money on it. 208 - > SPEAKER_02: Right. 209 - > Mark: Because if meta is spending money on it, then you 210 - > know that it's working within the algorithm and it's getting 211 - > good engagement, and meta wants to spend money because it's not 212 - > ruining the experience of people in the platform.
213 - > SPEAKER_02: Right. 214 - > Mark: And sometimes it's wrong. 215 - > Like I'm not saying just let Meta do whatever it wants all 216 - > the time. 217 - > Yeah.
218 - > But what I'm saying is sometimes people look at that and in two 219 - > days they're like, oh, this ad isn't working. 220 - > But if you leave it on for seven days or even 14 days, right, the 221 - > ad set or the campaign or the that audience, like you you'll 222 - > actually see an uplift. 223 - > SPEAKER_02: Yeah. 224 - > Mark: So this illusion of, oh, I need to to go in and granularly 225 - > select or deselect every little option, it just creates extra 226 - > work, added, added friction and fear because you constantly, you 227 - > know, it's like investing again, to liken it unto investing.
228 - > Um you don't control the company that you're investing in. 229 - > SPEAKER_02: Yeah. 230 - > Mark: We don't control everything that's happening in 231 - > the world, right? 232 - > As advertisers.
233 - > We like to think we do, but we don't. 234 - > We don't control seasonality, we don't control uh international 235 - > affairs, we don't control the purchasing power of the dollar, 236 - > we don't control people's emotions. 237 - > Like, you know, we can influence people's emotions, but we don't 238 - > control every variable out there. 239 - > So why make a decision like off of a false positive or a false 240 - > negative within a certain time frame when you probably don't 241 - > have all the data?
242 - > So you have to start measuring things in terms of 243 - > incrementality and halo effects. 244 - > And again, all those tools can help with that. 245 - > Like we're not definitely not against that. 246 - > But even within those tools, don't have the illusion.
247 - > And and these and by the way, the tools don't claim to have 248 - > all the answers. 249 - > If you go in and you look at their attribution settings, it's 250 - > like, hey, look at this. 251 - > It's supposed to give you a frame of reference and mind 252 - > within certain contexts. 253 - > Yeah.
254 - > So don't get fooled. 255 - > Like they're not lying either. 256 - > Right. 257 - > It's hey, here's last click, here's full, here's you know, 258 - > evenly attributed, here's our machine learning model, yeah, 259 - > here's our marketing mix model, whatever.
260 - > SPEAKER_02: Yeah. 261 - > Mark: But don't don't pretend like you control everything 262 - > about a customer's journey. 263 - > unknown: Right. 264 - > Mark: You just don't.
265 - > Trevor: Right. 266 - > Yeah, I think the reason why we're interested in this topic, 267 - > Mark's kind of talked a little bit about top of funnel stuff 268 - > and bottom of the funnel, you know, like that's where this 269 - > conversation is leading. 270 - > I think one thing that we see a lot as advertisers is we see a 271 - > lot of brands putting tons of money um into campaigns, ad 272 - > sets, ads that are driving results, like immediate results. 273 - > Mark: They are driving reported ROAS.
274 - > Trevor: Which is results, yeah. 275 - > Which is important. 276 - > We're not saying that that's that's not important, but the 277 - > problem with that incremental. 278 - > It's not incremental and it's not sustainable.
279 - > Meaning if you do that, you are always going to be fighting for 280 - > the it's almost like a race to the bottom at that point. 281 - > Right? 282 - > If you are a brand who recognizes that your CAC is 283 - > going up every year, your ROAS is going down every year, and 284 - > business is harder and harder, it probably means that you're 285 - > fishing out of the bottom of the barrel. 286 - > Mark: And constantly.
287 - > And the more you continue to do that, the worse it's gonna get. 288 - > Trevor: Because the less and less people are in there. 289 - > Mark: Yeah. 290 - > Trevor: Right?
291 - > And the more everyone else is also trying to buy from those 292 - > people because nowadays those people, the people at the bottom 293 - > of the funnel, the people who are just buying in specific 294 - > categories, like we're not only competing with our competitors 295 - > anymore, we're competing with every other it brand that's 296 - > trying to market to the same person who's this, you know, the 297 - > 35-year-old mom who is the decision maker for the 298 - > household, for example.
299 - > Right? 300 - > So it's not just your competitors who are, you know, 301 - > fighting for her, it's everyone else. 302 - > So when you are not manufacturing and billing and 303 - > finding more of those new people who might not be ready to buy, 304 - > every year things are gonna get harder and harder for you. 305 - > Yes?
306 - > Mark: Yes, it is. 307 - > Trevor: So that's the I think that's the conversation we want 308 - > to have today. 309 - > You know, like what what do brands need to do? 310 - > The question is if you are a brand who whose CAC has risen 311 - > every year, whose ROS has increased every year, decreased 312 - > every year, what are some things brands can start doing today to 313 - > get out of that hole?
314 - > Mark: Well, number one, I know this is this might be a little 315 - > strange, but it is understanding what the central limit theorem 316 - > is in statistics, which is when you have enough of something, it 317 - > eventually reaches a normal distribution. 318 - > Okay so like heights, weights, anything really around people, 319 - > eventually you reach a normal distribution. 320 - > So when you're measuring ads or when you're you're putting stuff 321 - > into ads, over time you will reach a normal distribution in 322 - > your performance, and in the performance of your ads, you're 323 - > gonna have outliers, right?
324 - > You're gonna have outliers on both sides, performers and bad 325 - > performers. 326 - > Trevor: Yeah. 327 - > Mark: Um, and then you're gonna have a lot of stuff that kind of 328 - > like sits there in the in the average, but which is the 329 - > normal, which is kind of the normal, yeah. 330 - > But when you're thinking about placing your ad dollars into 331 - > something, you need to skew over into top funnel the bigger you 332 - > get.
333 - > And the reason why is because like we talk about organic, and 334 - > yes, organic distribution matters, and you should always 335 - > be striving for it, but it's just not realistic to expect 336 - > your organic distribution to, and by organic we mean not word 337 - > of mouth, like there's other organic distribution out there, 338 - > like when you're big enough, like the flywheel effect with 339 - > just word of mouth and people seeing you everywhere. 340 - > We're talking mostly like, hey, you did this effort, this 341 - > campaign, you know, whatever, and you want this many results 342 - > back from it.
343 - > Trevor: Yes. 344 - > Mark: It just doesn't, it's almost impossible to expect that 345 - > to outweigh what the paid is going to do because that's 346 - > ultimately you're it's a paid world. 347 - > Trevor: And that's yeah, that's what I was gonna say. 348 - > The reason for it, let me just cut you off, is because we are 349 - > just in a paid world, right?
350 - > So it's like, yes, there are those outliers of people who are 351 - > getting organic distribution and who are doing it. 352 - > It's just so much fewer and farther between. 353 - > And we're never gonna be the people who are ever gonna tell 354 - > you to not focus on those things. 355 - > But at the end of the day, 99% of the brands aren't ever going 356 - > to be able to accomplish that the way the 1% is, right?
357 - > Because Metto and TikTok is a paid world now. 358 - > Yeah. 359 - > This podcast is brought to you by BFF Creative. 360 - > BFF Creative is a software that meets services.
361 - > Any marketing collateral you need, whether that's ads, 362 - > emails, print designs, or social media, all you have to do is 363 - > submit a request, and one of BFF Creative's qualified designers 364 - > will create a design for you and it'll be completed in two to 365 - > three days. 366 - > BFF Creative allows you to submit as many requests and as 367 - > many revisions as you can with just one monthly fee. 368 - > And the best part is that it's month to month. 369 - > No contracts, no hidden fees, no nothing.
370 - > And if you use promo code unstoppable30, you'll get 30% 371 - > off for your first month on i. 372 - > Just go to bffcreative.co, pick your plan, and sign up today. 373 - > Mark: And so now we're going back to like frequencies and how 374 - > do you measure.
375 - > Well, what we like to do is the bigger, the bigger your budget 376 - > is. 377 - > You're starting to play the game of you just want to always be 378 - > there in a in a cost-effective way, but you're trying to be 379 - > there as often as possible, especially if you have uh a very 380 - > large TAM. 381 - > So again, going back to the the Giants, like Coca-Cola. 382 - > Like Coca-Cola was everywhere forever.
383 - > SPEAKER_02: Yeah. 384 - > Mark: The beers, Budweiser, Bud Light, like why are they 385 - > advertised? 386 - > Everyone knows who they are. 387 - > Trevor: Right.
388 - > Mark: Why are they always advertising on sports programs? 389 - > Trevor: Yeah, just because they're top of mind. 390 - > Why would you drink anything else but coke? 391 - > Mark: Like there, yeah, or Michel McLobe Ultra, whatever.
392 - > Like you see a beer commercial in every sporting event. 393 - > Yeah. 394 - > In movies, in movies, everything, right? 395 - > You see Coca-Cola everywhere.
396 - > Trevor: You see Pepsi, what they're trying to what they're 397 - > trying to do, what these brands are trying to do that are at 398 - > that level, right? 399 - > The billion dollar level, is they're just trying to make it 400 - > make it look like every scenario, if there is a place 401 - > for a beer to have be there or a place for a soda to be there, 402 - > you don't ever picture anything but they want you to see it and 403 - > then remember it as you're walking by.
404 - > Mark: Now these are consumables, so like again, you can see that 405 - > you can go to the store and get it right away. 406 - > It's it's a little different than maybe some of the uh the 407 - > product categories that our listeners sit in, or some of our 408 - > listeners. 409 - > Um but still you want to be the brand that they recognize as oh, 410 - > that's the brand. 411 - > Right.
412 - > Because the more they see you, the more they associate with you 413 - > with truth. 414 - > We've talked about this concept. 415 - > If you read Thinking Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman 416 - > Kahneman, and ultimately that's what advertising is. 417 - > It's supposed to build a consistent and predictable flow 418 - > of revenue in your business over time.
419 - > But again, you're gonna have ups and downs in that flow. 420 - > But like, how do you measure, how do you measure it 421 - > appropriately to push things up over time and consistently and 422 - > in a predictable way? 423 - > SPEAKER_02: Yeah. 424 - > Mark: And the more you nitpick and the more you're turning 425 - > things on and off at a granular level, the the more false flags 426 - > that you're gonna introduce, that could make things even 427 - > worse.
428 - > SPEAKER_02: Totally. 429 - > Mark: And that's and that is the hardest part, in my opinion, 430 - > about digital marketing right now is yeah, you can't wait too 431 - > long where losers are just losing money. 432 - > SPEAKER_02: Totally. 433 - > Mark: But you can't act too fast.
434 - > Yeah. 435 - > You have to wait for the right moments and the right 436 - > indicators, and then you have to make your plan of action. 437 - > But you can't just be in there turning things on and off all 438 - > the time because you're you're probably not gonna have a 439 - > consistent effort. 440 - > Trevor: Yeah.
441 - > Well, and every change you make also can shake up a lot of stuff 442 - > too, right? 443 - > It's not just that. 444 - > Yeah, because you're dealing with algorithms. 445 - > Yeah, it's not just chasing a false positive or double downing 446 - > on, you know, oh my gosh, this is working so good today.
447 - > Let's triple spend. 448 - > Like it's not just there's there's just more that goes into 449 - > it when you do that kind of thing. 450 - > Mark: Like we're obviously simplifying this all down. 451 - > There's more nuances and things can be a lot more difficult.
452 - > But ultimately, people are so consumed with ROAS and hitting 453 - > bofu, bottom of the funnel and mid-funnel, when you need to be 454 - > getting people introduced to your brand and then reminding 455 - > them about your brand. 456 - > Trevor: Yeah, you need to have you need to have budget going to 457 - > things that aren't bringing you money today. 458 - > Mark: You have to. 459 - > Trevor: Right?
460 - > But they might be bringing you money two weeks from now. 461 - > Mark: Yes. 462 - > Trevor: Or in theory, the lower stuff starts to get more 463 - > efficient two weeks from now. 464 - > Mark: And and again, this always goes back to measuring because 465 - > some people will take this and be like, oh, let's go spend 466 - > money on video view campaigns or traffic campaigns or whatever.
467 - > And sometimes that works. 468 - > But you have to have how are you going to measure the impact of 469 - > this effort? 470 - > And if you can't measure it, is it worth doing? 471 - > Yeah.
472 - > You have to know how to measure these things because sometimes 473 - > you're just shooting in the dark and you're like, oh, let's let's 474 - > try this little campaign, but it's like doesn't even indicate 475 - > a blip on the radar. 476 - > Yeah. 477 - > You can't measure it at all. 478 - > It's like, I don't know, maybe it drove something.
479 - > Trevor: Sure. 480 - > Mark: So how are you measuring these efforts? 481 - > So if you're if you're doing top funnel campaigns, you can do top 482 - > funnel with the sales objective. 483 - > You can do it with video engagement.
484 - > You can do it with different engagement options. 485 - > SPEAKER_02: Yeah. 486 - > Mark: But how are you measuring the downwind effect of these 487 - > efforts? 488 - > Trevor: Yeah.
489 - > Any recommendations, thoughts you have for people? 490 - > Mark: Well, are you are you measuring it through brand 491 - > search? 492 - > Are people searching your brand more often? 493 - > Are they coming through direct?
494 - > Are you measuring it through email signups and email flows? 495 - > Are you measuring it through sales impact over time? 496 - > Trevor: Are you measuring it through efficiency efforts 497 - > getting better? 498 - > Mark: Are you seeing efficiency increase over two weeks, three 499 - > weeks?
500 - > Are you because again, you don't want to be like, oh, I'm running 501 - > tofu. 502 - > It's gonna pan out in four months. 503 - > It's like uh yeah, like I guess I guess it depends on the 504 - > business, but well it depends on how much you're investing and 505 - > their frequency across that time frame. 506 - > Yeah.
507 - > And the mofu bofu side, but a lot of a lot of companies sit in 508 - > the seven to fourteen day window. 509 - > Yeah. 510 - > Which is why, by the way, the meta algorithm is always gonna 511 - > push down into the mofu bofu side. 512 - > Right.
513 - > Trevor: Because they need to show their quick winners. 514 - > Mark: Yeah, we've talked about this. 515 - > This is called a meta-optimized market. 516 - > Yeah.
517 - > So we talk about TAMs, right? 518 - > But meta within their targeting audience, yeah, it's reducing it 519 - > all the way down to the people they have identified who are 520 - > ready to purchase within their optimization windows. 521 - > Trevor: Yeah. 522 - > So what Mark is saying is like, if you are, let's take Poppy 523 - > versus Ollipop.
524 - > Mark: Yeah. 525 - > Trevor: Right? 526 - > If Poppy, right, they both have the same TAM. 527 - > Yeah.
528 - > Theoretically. 529 - > Yes? 530 - > Theoretically, yeah. 531 - > But let's say Poppy comes out.
532 - > Mark: It's anyone who's wants to sell. 533 - > Yeah. 534 - > Trevor: Let's say Poppy comes out and says, we can only afford 535 - > to have a three row as. 536 - > Because the people said so.
537 - > Mark: Yeah. 538 - > Trevor: And then Ollipop comes out and says, well, we can have 539 - > a 1.5. 540 - > What happens is you go from TAM and Poppy's meta-optimized 541 - > market takes the TAM and says, Well, at a three, we can only 542 - > get this many people.
543 - > Whereas Olipop says, Well, at a 1.5, we can get all we can 544 - > double that. 545 - > Mark: And then guess what? 546 - > All of those people are within the sales signals.
547 - > Trevor: Yes. 548 - > The people who are ready to buy. 549 - > Mark: You're not reaching, for example, let's just for 550 - > argument's sake, just say 100 million. 551 - > There's a hundred million people on the meta platforms actively.
552 - > Yeah. 553 - > Let's just say that for easy math. 554 - > SPEAKER_02: Yeah. 555 - > Mark: If your TAM is 80 million people, you're not reaching all 556 - > 80 million.
557 - > No. 558 - > Even if it says you reached 80 million last year, no, you 559 - > didn't because you had frequency. 560 - > You might have reached some of those people the year before. 561 - > You're not reaching everybody.
562 - > Yeah. 563 - > There's some brands might be, sure. 564 - > Depending on their objectives, but most people aren't. 565 - > Because most people are are narrowing it down to sales 566 - > objectives.
567 - > Trevor: Yeah. 568 - > Who's going to buy the quickest? 569 - > Mark: Yeah. 570 - > We've talked about this with uh Alex MacArthur, the former CMO 571 - > over at Purple.
572 - > And he is a big we probably should have him on the podcast 573 - > again. 574 - > Is he a big proponent of this? 575 - > Is like you have to build moments that resonate over time. 576 - > SPEAKER_02: Yeah.
577 - > Mark: And if you get too caught up, then it's just a it's a slow 578 - > death march for your brand. 579 - > Trevor: Yeah, it might look really good for a year. 580 - > And then the next year all you have. 581 - > That Curtis uh what's the Portland Leather?
582 - > What's his last name? 583 - > He was on the podcast. 584 - > Cut this out. 585 - > Curtis with an M.
586 - > Anyways, he was on the podcast and he talked about this too. 587 - > He's like, when I was in my early days of Portland Leather, 588 - > I looked up to Curtis Matsko. 589 - > Yeah, he's like, I looked up to five brands and they were so 590 - > much bigger and better than me. 591 - > And they stopped growing, they stopped scaling and trying to 592 - > stretch for new numbers.
593 - > And within like five to ten years, all of them came to him, 594 - > hey, come buy us. 595 - > Because he focused on growth and just touching and reaching new 596 - > people, whereas they've just focused in this spot. 597 - > Mark: Yeah. 598 - > Trevor: And he's like, Some of them are still around, but no 599 - > nobody's, and some of them are not around.
600 - > He's like, I would have never thought 10 years ago that that I 601 - > would be bigger than them and that they would just be what 602 - > they were. 603 - > Because eventually they just get in this circular bottom feeder 604 - > world of okay, cool. 605 - > There's one person that just fell down here. 606 - > Let's already nab them up.
607 - > Mark: I'm just convinced a lot of it's just mindset at this 608 - > point. 609 - > Yeah. 610 - > Well, I that's why that's why I brought up that. 611 - > I get almost all is just mindset of like how that's why I brought 612 - > up your day trading.
613 - > Trevor: Like that's the been the best thing, like the best 614 - > analogy. 615 - > Like if you can just stick to it and you play the statistics of 616 - > it, like I know it's i people do the same thing. 617 - > Listen, I'm not you you brought it, you likened it unto 618 - > gabbling. 619 - > Gambling.
620 - > I have never been successful playing blackjack until my 621 - > friend taught me. 622 - > He said, every time you win, if you can increase your next bet 623 - > by 10 to 15%, and you just play that game and you play the 624 - > numbers, he's like, you may not come out making tons of money. 625 - > He's like, but you'll be able to play blackjack for four hours 626 - > and not lose and just pretty much break even. 627 - > Yeah.
628 - > Break even at a minimum to and there's been times where I've 629 - > like, and I'm acting like I play, I don't play blackjack a 630 - > lot, but when I have, ever since I've done that method of just 631 - > like I have a mindset of I have I know what the rules are, I'm 632 - > never double downing at XYZ, I'm never hitting when the dealer's 633 - > holding a six, you know, like those things, and I'm always 634 - > increasing that 10 to 15%. 635 - > Because then eventually you start winning really, really 636 - > big.
637 - > Mark: Yeah. 638 - > You know? 639 - > Yeah, but you you can also do that in day trading, and but in 640 - > day trading, and and the same thing with black check, you're 641 - > just talking about probabilities. 642 - > Yeah.
643 - > So if you understand probabilities and what your 644 - > probability is with each setup, yeah, and you trust the normal 645 - > distribution of those probabilities over time. 646 - > So like if you have an 80% chance, just because you lose 647 - > doesn't mean it wasn't still. 648 - > Trevor: Even if you lose twice. 649 - > Yeah.
650 - > Mark: Or three times in a row. 651 - > Like you're it's still an 80% setup. 652 - > Right. 653 - > So and if you can do that over time, the averages work out for 654 - > you.
655 - > Totally. 656 - > Trevor: And obviously, paid the paid ads game is much more 657 - > probable and statistically. 658 - > Well, there's so many more, yeah. 659 - > There's like no than than this.
660 - > This is gambling, right? 661 - > Mark: Versus it's just it's just we want people to understand the 662 - > mindset of it is people get too caught up in the emotional 663 - > whiplash, and we get it. 664 - > It is emotional. 665 - > This is money, this is your livelihood.
666 - > Trevor: If you have investors, like sometimes we want it, 667 - > sometimes the founders need to see certain numbers. 668 - > Easier said than done. 669 - > Mark: Yeah. 670 - > But man, the brands that we see that are just humming along are 671 - > just sticking to plans.
672 - > Trevor: And they have short-term memories. 673 - > Mark: And they they understand what a loser is, but they're not 674 - > so quick about it. 675 - > Yeah. 676 - > I mean, even if things aren't going well, they stick to a plan 677 - > for a month.
678 - > Totally. 679 - > You know, it's like, oh, things don't look great right now. 680 - > Like, what's going on? 681 - > Trevor: Yeah.
682 - > I literally just got off, I mean, right before this podcast, 683 - > I got off a phone with somebody who we increased their budgets 684 - > massively and saw a hit in conversion rate this week. 685 - > You know, but there are certain things that make us make it look 686 - > like no, no, no, this was actually a good move. 687 - > It just this is just a blip. 688 - > Mark: Let's let it play out.
689 - > Trevor: And it was, you know, it's music to my ears, and 690 - > they're like, Yeah, let's do it. 691 - > Like, we don't need we don't need a decrease. 692 - > Like, yes, we know that the last four days sucked. 693 - > That's lost money.
694 - > Most people would say the decision we made was wrong. 695 - > Mark: But the leading KPIs are telling us. 696 - > Trevor: But the lead metrics are saying no, things are fine. 697 - > The cost per clicks are looking really, really healthy.
698 - > Your through plays are looking really healthy. 699 - > Your yeah, your bounce rate is looking really healthy. 700 - > Your average session duration is looking very, very healthy. 701 - > For whatever reason, conversion rate's just a little bit lower 702 - > right now.
703 - > Mark: You're just driving like the the newer the audience, the 704 - > less your conversion rate will be. 705 - > Trevor: Yeah. 706 - > Mark: And it can balance out over time, you know. 707 - > But like if you start really, if you haven't been pushing new, 708 - > heavy into new and tofu, you're not gonna see, you're gonna, 709 - > it's gonna be a little bit of a shock.
710 - > unknown: Yeah. 711 - > Mark: So but again, know what your KPIs are. 712 - > What are your lead, what are your lags, what are you 713 - > measuring, and then when do you pull the plug? 714 - > Totally.
715 - > SPEAKER_02: Yeah. 716 - > Mark: We call that a stop loss. 717 - > You have to let you have to be willing to let something lose a 718 - > little bit. 719 - > Trevor: Totally.
720 - > Mark: Before pulling the plug. 721 - > Trevor: Yeah. 722 - > Failures are winners too. 723 - > Mark: Sometimes.
724 - > Yeah. 725 - > Trevor: All right. 726 - > I've heard that before. 727 - > All right.
728 - > Thank you guys. 729 - > Um I don't have anything else. 730 - > Is that good enough? 731 - > Yeah.
732 - > Yeah. 733 - > Appreciate you guys. 734 - > Thanks for tuning in. 735 - > We'll see you later.
736 - > Thank you for listening to the Unstoppable Marketer Podcast. 737 - > If there's a brand campaign strategy or marketing tactic 738 - > that you want us to review, please DM me at the TrevorCrump 739 - > on Instagram or TikTok or at the Unstoppable Marketer Podcast. 740 - > And of course, if you got value from this episode or if you like 741 - > it whatsoever, please make sure you're subscribing, you're 742 - > liking, you're following, and for sure go leave us a review to 743 - > let us know that we're doing a good job.
744 - > We will see you guys next time. 745 - > Mark: Oh what a good place to be.
Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.