The B2B Podcast Index
Index
All categories
MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
MethodologySubmit
Best of:MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
An independent project byFame
SearchBest episodesGuestsInsightsMethodologySubmit a podcast
Index/Marketing/The Unstoppable Marketer®
The Unstoppable Marketer® artwork

Ep. 153 | Organic Traffic Is Dying (Here’s What Smart Brands Are Doing Instead)

The Unstoppable Marketer® · 2026-06-09 · 39 min

0:00--:--

Key moments - from our scoring

Substance score

50 / 100

Five dimensions, 20 points each

Insight Density12 / 20
Originality10 / 20
Guest Caliber8 / 20
Specificity & Evidence11 / 20
Conversational Craft9 / 20

The episode addresses why brands are experiencing declining overall returns on marketing investment, attributing it not to ad platform failure but to the structural shift from chronological to algorithmic feeds that began in 2016-2018. Mark Goldhart and co-host explain how this transformation has compressed margins and forced brands to operate as paid-first companies rather than relying on organic reach. They argue that most brands' efficiency metrics (MER, ROAS, ROI) have declined because organic traffic - which historically carried better conversion rates - has become negligible, while paid advertising hasn't fully compensated. The solution involves three key moves: accepting lower ROAS targets and higher volume strategies; reducing OpEx below 15% through AI tools instead of large teams; and fundamentally changing content strategy to prioritize diversity across audience segments and creator partnerships. Meta's algorithmic goal is engagement duration, so brands must create shareable, conversation-starting content that works across different audience personas (gamers, sports fans, etc.) rather than monolithic messaging. The episode serves B2B operators and D2C brands facing margin compression, explaining why the old playbook broke and what paid-first operations look like in 2024-2025.

Key takeaways

  • →Organic traffic decline since 2016-2018 is structural and irreversible - brands must shift from organic-first to paid-first operations and adjust profit expectations accordingly.
  • →Content strategy must prioritize shareability and conversation (shares and comments are the strongest algorithmic signals) rather than likes or saves to drive organic reach in algorithmic feeds.
  • →Brands need audience-segmented content diversity across ads and creator partnerships rather than monolithic messaging, because algorithmic feeds serve different content to different personas based on their behavior.
  • →Operating costs must drop below 15% (from historical 30-35%) by leveraging AI-powered tools instead of large in-house teams to offset rising customer acquisition costs.
  • →Cost-per-reach comparison ($100 CPM × 10 frequency = $100 CPR) must drive decisions about when organic initiatives justify investment versus paid channels that provide pre-qualified audiences.

Topics in this episode

Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC)ROAS (Return on Ad Spend)MER (Marketing Efficiency Ratio)User-generated content (UGC)Creator partnershipsMeta algorithmic feedsCost-per-reach calculationAlgorithmic signals (shares, comments)Paid-first business modelOperating expense optimization

Questions this episode answers

Why is organic social traffic declining for most brands even if their ads are still performing?

Organic traffic has been declining structurally since 2016-2018 when feeds shifted from chronological to algorithmic; ads performing better can't fully offset this loss over years, so blended ROI/MER shrinks as paid traffic rises but overall customer acquisition efficiency falls.

What's the single strongest organic signal for Meta's algorithm?

Shares are the strongest algorithmic signal, followed by comments, because they extend content duration on-platform by introducing new users and starting conversations - likes and saves have diminished in importance.

How should brands calculate whether to spend on organic content versus paid ads?

Compare cost-per-reach: if your ad CPM × frequency = cost-per-reach (e.g., $100 per 1,000 people), determine what organic initiatives could produce better conversion rates at that cost to justify the spend.

What specific changes did Meta recommend brands make to succeed in algorithmic feeds?

Meta recommends diversity of content, creator partnerships, UGC (user-generated content), white-labeling, and segmented messaging for different audience personas since the algorithm no longer distributes monolithic content equally.

What operating expense target should brands aim for to offset rising customer acquisition costs?

Brands should reduce OpEx below 15% (down from historical 30-35%) by using AI tools instead of large teams, enabling sustainable profitability as CAC and tariffs increase.

What our scoring noted

Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.

Insight Density

12 / 20

The episode covers legitimate shifts in organic traffic patterns and the need to adapt to algorithmic platforms, with useful frameworks like the baseball analogy (singles, doubles, home runs) and the emphasis on shareability metrics. However, substantial portions are devoted to personal anecdotes (baby naming, family background) that dilute the core message, and much of the advice is relatively standard (diversify content, focus on shareability, shift to paid-first). The insights about Meta's goal-keeping users on platform, CPM calculations, and the Brita case study add some density, but these are interspersed with repetitive framing and throat-clearing.

Across the board, we are just seeing organic traffic disappear for people. Like what was working is no longer working.
Meta's goal is to keep you on the platform for as long as possible

Originality

10 / 20

The core thesis - that organic traffic is declining and brands must shift to paid-first strategies with diversified content - is well-worn in marketing discourse. The baseball analogy (singles, doubles, home runs applied to content performance) is a decent framing device but not novel. The emphasis on shares as the primary algorithmic signal and the observation about Brita's unhinged approach are somewhat fresh, but the overall strategic recommendations (diversify personas, create shareable content, focus on paid efficiency) are widely circulated in D2C marketing circles. The episode rehashes established platform evolution narratives (chronological feed → algorithmic → video-dominant → UGC-friendly).

it's no longer 2020, it's no longer 2016, 2026, and it's all algorithmic AI based on your recommendations, on what you see
singles in this at bat analogy, what is it doing? It's increasing your probability of scoring

Guest Caliber

8 / 20

The episode features only the two hosts (Trevor Crump and Mark Goldhart), with no external guest brought on to provide practitioner expertise or contrasting perspectives. While the hosts appear to run a marketing agency and have client anecdotes, they do not introduce named founders, operators, or case studies featuring specific individuals who have scaled businesses. The discussion relies entirely on the hosts' observations and framework-building without validation from external practitioners or high-caliber sources. This significantly limits perceived credibility and depth for a B2B operator audience.

we've been having it for years with people
in a lot of our audits, yeah, sometimes ads are not performing

Specificity & Evidence

11 / 20

The episode includes one concrete case study (Brita water filter with specific metrics: 356,000 shares, 2.6 million views, 70,000 shares on a March 18th post) and some made-up but illustrative math (CPM $10, frequency 10, cost per reach $100 per thousand). However, the majority of claims lack specific data: no named D2C brands showing efficiency decline, no exact performance drops (mentions vague comparisons like "2016 you were making seven back, 2020 it was five"), no specific tariff figures, and no named campaigns beyond Brita and Nutter Butter. The baseball analogy includes relative percentages (50-75% increases) but no real company examples. Client references are anonymized ("I'm looking at a social media profile right now. I'm not gonna tell you who it is"), limiting verifiability.

out of their last five posts, let's call it 10,000, 10,000, 8,000 views, 10,000 views, and then you have 50,000
This reel has 356,000 shares

Conversational Craft

9 / 20

The hosts engage in back-and-forth dialogue and build on each other's points, which creates flow, but lack substantive follow-ups or pushback on claims. When one host makes a statement, the other typically validates or tangentially adds to it rather than probing deeper. There are few sharp questions that challenge assumptions (e.g., no one asks why Brita's approach would work across all product categories, or what the actual CAC impact is of the shift to paid-first). The tone is collegial but lacks intellectual friction. The hosts also meander frequently - the 5-minute baby naming tangent is emblematic - allowing side conversations to subsume the core narrative rather than staying disciplined. Some natural curiosity exists ("Is it working?"), but follow-ups are cursory.

So define what getting on base is. Define what a single is.
like maybe product doesn't need to be there. It doesn't. Like maybe your social doesn't need to show product much. And and I would argue I don't know. I would are I mean, I do know.

Conversation analysis

Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.

Most-used words

organic21content18name17start16paid14different14first13brand13base13three12singles12traffic11views11social10back10meta10

Episode notes

Send us Fan Mail Organic traffic isn’t what it used to be, and most brands are feeling it. In this episode of The Unstoppable Marketer®, Mark Goldhart and Trevor Crump break down why organic reach is declining across platforms and what that means for modern marketing. They explain the shift from chronological feeds to fully algorithmic, AI-driven content, why paid media is becoming the foundation of growth, and how brands need to rethink their entire strategy. Most importantly, they reveal the real metric that matters now: shareability. If your content isn’t getting shared, it’s getting ignored, and this episode shows you how to fix that.

Full transcript

39 min

Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.

Across the board, we are just seeing organic traffic disappear for people. Like what was working is no longer working. And this is not just uh isolated, hey, this one company here, that company over there. Just generally overall, people are not seeing the kind of organic traffic that they used to be able to get.

Yeah, as well as your organic traffic too. Like your like or if you have like a decent organic social, I always notice my organic social starts too. This is just the reality of how the platform works. It does not work how it used to.

It's no longer 2020, it's no longer 2016, 2026, and it's all algorithmic AI based on your recommendations, on what you see. And the better that you can fit into those preferences without ruining the experience, then that's how you win. Yo, what's going on, everybody? Yo, what's going on?

What's going on, everybody? Welcome to the Unstoppable Marketer Podcast with me as always, my co-host Mark Goldhart. How are you? Great.

New dad over here, guys. Thank you. A new dad. We took the week off last week, I think, because you had a baby.

That's right, my wife. Number four. Tell us about the baby. Don't tell us about you don't have to tell us about the experience.

Um give some deeds. Well, mom, baby, are happy, healthy, at home. Boy girl. He's a little boy named Lyle.

Paul Goldhart. You know that's my middle name too. Paul? Yeah.

Is it? Yeah. I forgot. Where does Paul come from in the It's my it is a family name.

It's my dad's middle name. It's my dad's middle name too. Oh, is it? Yeah.

But he goes by a but he goes by Paul. Then it's my dad's dad's middle name, his dad's first name, his dad's first name. Nice. And so and then it's my oldest brother's middle name too.

Yeah, we didn't keep it. My nephew's middle name. Okay. Oh, nice.

I didn't keep it in the lineage of my kin. Oh, you didn't? I didn't. Well, you know, I think there's two ways to do names.

We did family names. Some like like we're family name people. Some like new names, some like family names. Some like old family names.

Yeah. We like to like try to look back. Like Lyle is my wife's great-grandpa. Who she knew until she was like 21 or 22.

Yeah. So she like actually had a grandpa experience with him. Yeah. But um so yeah, Lyle.

We like old names, old man names. Yeah. My little Lyle. My son's middle name is Legrand.

Oh, that's a good one. That's a like a big, deep, deep cut family name. That is a deep cut. So that's like uh there's like he's the fourth now person, I think, or fifth.

We should have named him Legrand. Jude Crump. And he could have just gone by Jude. Jude.

Yeah. Yeah. Sometimes you don't want the burden of like That's a big name. Legrand is a very good thing.

Or just like sometimes a family name carries like oh, there's like kind of weight to it, or like, you know, there's too many of them. Yeah, my my uh wife's one of my wife's really good friends, uh they have the firstborn son. Like they're a very uh traditional, very, very traditional family. So it's like the third, fourth, fifth?

A very wealthy Utah family, like uh old, old money, and it's Michael Sean. So it's a double name. Michael Sean is the first name. Are they what what are they on?

Like the third, fourth, fifth generation? Oh, I mean they're they've gotta be on like fifth or sixth animation. Yeah, and so they named she was very against naming their son, but she did not want to do it. You know?

Yeah. To me, it's very natural now. It seemed very strange in the beginning, but it's very natural. Yeah, they ended up naming it, but they call him Sean.

So hey, why not, man? Create a but her husband is very staunch. Like, my name is Michael Sean, it's not Michael, it's not Sean, it's Michael Sean. You know what?

And I like hold on to some tradition. I agree. I agree. But yeah, we'll congrats.

Baby's here, you're here, everyone's healthy and happy. Uh couple couple quick things as we jump into the podcast. Today's gonna be quick because we just have this like constant, we've had this constant conversation that's been coming up with with several clients. And it's been a conversation that has actually been, I mean, we've been having it for years with people, but it almost seems like every there, there's always like a as things get a little bit more challenging in brand accounts or as a brand starts to feel like the burden of, hey, I'm not growing or scaling, it that's when this conversation seemed, you know, scaling as quickly as I want.

I realized I didn't finish my sentence. There's always this like, oh, well, quick reminder, this is why, you know, kind of thing. So that's what we want to get into. I think maybe the uh quick like e-com rundown, and I think that this was the same one that we gave last time, but I think it's just important to like make note is this was the last I mean, most people are either in their last week of school right now as the time you're hearing this.

Yeah, I think it um everyone's out now. Yeah, but by the time everyone's hearing the nation, you're you're probably out. Your kids are probably out. And so, you know, with the change in scheduling, uh just depending on who your customer is, you know, there's a really, really good chance that sales will uh uh slow down for you.

Um once again, just depending on who your ICP is. Um if your ICP is a mom with younger children, uh families with younger children, then that oftentimes that's not a uh problem solution product. That's oftentimes the the person who gets hit the hardest in these Yeah, if you hold everything constant in your business, sales will go down. Yes, exactly.

Because it's just a simple equation. Like people are not more people are doing things outside of their house, outside of their regular once summer hits. Yeah, kids are running around. I mean, I have I have at any time not on their phone as much.

Like, so your your supply of eyes on social platforms will naturally dip. Yeah, as well as your organic traffic too. Like your like or if you have like a decent organic social, I always notice my organic social starts too these next two months just because it kinds of droops. It's very similar shopping, right?

You get when you have eight kids running around your house and your kids have friends and all that kind of stuff, like it's just a little less easy to veg on your phone. Not that my own. And even if you don't have kids, like if you're if you're single or if you're married, no kids, together with someone, no kids. Everyone just wants to like once the summer, like once the summer is here, like people want to do things.

Travel. It's natural to just wanna like I want to go see movies now. I want to go travel. I want to go see someone, I want to just go to the pool, yeah, go to the park.

Yep. So there people are more likely to go do things. So speaking of, so yeah, just be aware of it. And speaking of this kind, so the concept, I think that's a good segue into the topic today, which is um there's this notion that meta is getting harder for brands, advertising is getting harder and harder, it's less easy to scale, it's less easy to get the efficiency metrics that you want.

And though there can be truth to that statement, we think that the challenge is coming from something else. Well, yeah, I mean let's clarify. Sure. Most people are looking at blended.

Right. So you're looking at a blended result or efficiency metric of your sales and your spend across channels. And you're noticing, especially if you're not especially if you're a newer brand and you started D2C. Like I don't, you know, I don't know what it's like for traditional.

Sure. But you're noticing things get getting a little harder. Like you're not seeing the same results overall, like maybe it's a ROI or MER, whatever metric you're looking at. Like you can see over the past couple years, it's probably getting worse.

Yeah, when you suspend a dollar, maybe in 2016 you were making seven back. You know, 2020 it was five, four, twenty, twenty-five, twenty-six, is it now to a two? Is it a two or three? Three or one.

I don't know. Sure. But what I think's important to look at, and we've talked about this before, but across the board, we are just seeing organic traffic disappear for people. Absolutely.

Like what was working is no longer working. And this is not just a isolated, hey, this one company here, that company over there. Just generally, overall, people are not seeing the kind of organic traffic that they used to be able to get. Right.

And guess what? Like this started back in 2016, 2018, 20. Like, we've seen it. Yeah, 2018 is really like the the key start of that.

So, and so we've seen these two waves, right? Like, you had this chronological error or era, not error, era of 2014 to 2018, 19-ish. That's when everything was chronological. You got followers, you posted, they saw it, people bought, easy.

I mean, like every time you posted, you'd get money, essentially. People would buy. Yep. Then things became more algorithmic.

So the chronological feed was ditched, people weren't necessarily going to see you, but it was also favoring, I think, like per individuals at that time as well, and the creators. Creators over rands. And then you have this new era where some people took advantage and some didn't. So we have uh the initial like millennial era where people really suffered because it's like, hey, guess what?

Pictures on the feed doesn't drive traffic anymore. And people started adjusting. Okay, they do affiliates or you know, they do like collaborations, they do giveaway. Remember the giveaway era, all that stuff.

Yep. But then it became, hey, Meta is going to replicate a lot of what TikTok is doing. So now Reels is introduced. Yep.

And as people start spending their time differently on Instagram and Facebook, and it becomes more algorithmic, it doesn't even matter who you follow. Yep. You have to decide if you're gonna go look at your followers. But if you're just scrolling, it becomes very much just a wide open game.

They're just gonna try to feed you stuff that makes you again the whole point of these platforms want they want you to spend time on the platform. The more time you spend on the platform, the more likely you're gonna see that type of content. Likely you're just gonna see stuff, yeah. And and that's their goal is to keep you on the platform.

TikTok and Meta want you on their platforms for as long as possible. Right. That's all they care about. Um, so now it becomes algorithmic.

Um, and some brands at the beginning, as it shifted from photos to videos, that really hard switch, a lot of brands took off there too. So, like you kind of had this passing of the guard. Some brands adjusted, some brands came onto the scene 2018, 1920 and took advantage of hey, we can make videos, we can make reels. Yep.

But maybe following kind of the same playbooks, but just transferred into reels. Sure. Transferred into videos. Yeah.

And that was great because everything became video-based, right? Instagram started as a photo sharing app, has evolved into what it is today. But over the last since 2004, you're seeing your the power of that strategy start to diminish. Yes.

Quickly. But so overall, it's been diminishing since 2016, but it's it's diminishing. And so what's happening is it is your MER, your AROI, or your ROI, whatever metric you look at internally is getting squeezed. And you're probably looking around, wondering, like, hey, are ads performing?

Well, in a lot of our audits, yeah, sometimes ads are not performing to their options. What did you say in a lot of our what? Audits. Audits.

Okay, sorry. Sometimes ads are not performing. Um but a 20% loss in efficiency or 50% loss in efficiency in ads does not make up for the majority of what the traffic loss that you that you've lost over the last three or four years. Right.

And that's the juxtaposition. That's the rock and the hard place that a lot of people are finding themselves in is what do you do when you have to evolve into a paid first company? Yeah, exactly. I mean because your margins will get smaller.

And and the first thing is it's not to your profits are gonna get squeezed. It's not to open up my MER or to decrease my efficiency ratio. What's happening, and I think the hard thing, and I think the reason why we need to talk about this over and over again, is so that people understand that it's not necessarily because your performance isn't when I say performance, meaning when you're spending and what you're bringing in, if it's decreasing, that doesn't mean it's because your ad strategies are poor necessarily.

Right? It could just simply mean well, ads are just the easiest thing to look at because they are instant feedback. Yeah. So your brand marketing initiatives or your organic initiatives or whatever you're doing out there, obviously it's always harder to measure.

Yeah. But people are often gonna go, well, what's the quickest thing? Oh, well, MER is down, therefore ads need to change the way they're approaching it. Totally.

But when you look at it, if you were to look at a graph, right? And if you were to look from 2020 or whenever you started your business on, and you were to go paid and then everything else non-paid, right? Traffic, essentially, what you're probably seeing is a rise in paid and a dip in everything else. Now your overall traffic might be going up still because your paid traffic is making up the difference.

But as those two met as those two lines kind of converge together, this is where your ROIs start to get stretched, right? Or shrink, I suppose is what I should say. And so this is what what you mean by like, well, what do you do when you are a per paid first company? Well, you have to start operating like a paid first company.

And we're not to not to say that there aren't other things you can do to start to try to get that organic up, no nor should you stop trying to do that. But you just need to alter and change how you look at your data. And some of those things that we've discussed are increasing your MER, decreasing your AROI goals. Those are oftentimes one and the same, right?

Um and having to just do more volume to get better profits. Yeah, you yeah, we talked about that, like outpacing the efficiency problem. Yes. Um guess what?

That's what the biggest companies in the world do. The other thing that a lot of Unless you're Louis Vuitton. Yeah. The other the other thing a lot of a lot of companies are are doing that I I don't think we necessarily need to jump into this totally, but I think something that's important to note is in the wake of AI, there's so much that you can do with so much less.

And so I think that if we were to look at what your OpEx was in 20 like 18 versus 2021, it's like opex was probably like 30 to 35%, is what like a lot of people looked at back in 2018. Big teams were a big thing, right? Like I remember when I was a CMO, that was the thing. It's like we got to build this team.

Like we're only gonna be as big as our team is big. Like I remember that was a very like it seems silly now, but I remember thinking that like legitimately all the time. Like, okay, if I want to grow another million dollars, I probably need to add like two or three more people to this organization, right? Um, whereas now you can do more with less.

And so I think the goal is as you've seen CAC increase, as you've seen things like tariffs increase and just overall costs increase, you have got to try to find a way to get your opex below 15% and maybe even below 10. Although it looks like tariffs are uh Yeah, you are getting some paybacks for that. You are getting some paybacks. So shout out to those.

You just have to look at the business different. That's that's the that's the thing. And if you are in this situation that we are talking about, which I would imagine almost everyone listening to this podcast, unless you are a brand new business, you're going through this or have been going through this for the last little bit. And we're hoping that this is the permission that it takes for you to be like, oh, where's the light bulb moment?

How do I rework the math here and start operating like I'm a paid first? Now, once you do that, let's figure out the organic game. It's not a this or that, but I think what might help people conceptualize this a little better is if you are on meta, let's just say you have a frequency rate of just let's let's just make this easy math. Like I'm not saying this is exactly true, but we're making this easy math.

So let's say your CPM is 10. Let's say you have a frequency rate over the month of 10, right? So your cost per reach in a month is going to be $100 per thousand. So cost per reach is per thousand people.

Yep. Right? So if it's a thousand dollars, then how do you justify spending on content or initiatives when you could put it into Meta or into TikTok to get the same amount of reach for much better? That could be better does a great job at qualifying.

Right. That's already somewhat pre-qualified, yes. Now the caveat there is everything is different. So like if you're going over a general audience, conversion rates like top funnel, different.

Generally, if you could get something that hits from an organic perspective or perspective, the the the conversion rates are gonna be much better. But so like if you have $100 per 1,000 reached, then now you can just do the math. Like, what is what's my CPM? What's my cost per reach over in ads?

Hey, what kind of things can we do that are cost effective at first, and then let's swing GWIG. Yeah. I think what's the the problem and the mindset that a lot of people have right now is we have to fix this overnight. We think that the solution has more to do with consistent effort.

Totally. And trying to figure out what the new game is because the new game here is maybe it's not even business profiles, right? Maybe it's shared content with creators, maybe it's and and guess what that is. Meta has talked about this.

Like you want to lean into partnership ads, to white labeling, to UGC, to diversity of faces, diversity of content. Because Meta is trying to, again, like when you think about it, of like what is Meta's goal? Again, going back, Meta's goal is to keep you on the platform for as long as possible. Yeah.

So let's say you're a brand selling clothes, men's clothes. All right. I'm a I'm a I'm a men's brand, but okay, cool. What kind of clothes do you sell?

Let's just say like basics, which uh there's a wide variety of men that that could relate to that. Right. Well, so how do you reach like if I'm a if I'm a gamer and then I'm a sports bro, the gamer is consuming gamer content. Yep.

His algorithm is feeding him what gamer content. Yep. He is not seeing all of the latest, not that these people don't overlap, but they let's just trend for the sake of conversation. Yeah, he's he's watching Twitch things, or you know, is it Twitch?

Is that the streaming platform? He's watching Nintendo releases and PS5 stuff or whatever. This guy over here, the sports bro, he's watching Barstool, he's Dave Portnoy clips, he's going through whatever shams, bleacher report, bleacher report. Sure.

He's getting served different kinds of content. Yep. Right. So So, if you need to relate to men and you don't have this like specific we sell sports stuff, well, how do you relate to two different guys?

Well, you relate by two different kinds of ads, two different kinds of people in those ads. Different types of different pieces of content. And so diversity. That's what we're talking about.

Like, how do you relate? Because with the algorithm, it's no longer monolithic. It's decentralized. Like you can't just say, hey, I made a good thing.

That's great. You made a good thing, but maybe that doesn't relate to half of your audience in the way that the algorithm wants it to relate to them. Yeah. So it's a little dystopian, but that's this is just the reality of how the platform works.

It does not work how it used to. It's no longer 2020, it's no longer 2016, 2026, and it's all algorithmic AI based on your recommendations, on what you see. Yeah. And they they want the ads to reflect those preferences.

Right. And the better that you can fit into those preferences without ruining the experience, then that's how you win. This podcast is brought to you by BFF Creative. BFF Creative is a software that meets services.

Any marketing collateral you need, whether that's ads, emails, print designs, or social media, all you have to do is submit a request, and one of BFF Creative's qualified designers will create a design for you and it'll be completed in two to three days. BFF Creative allows you to submit as many requests and as many revisions as you can with just one monthly fee. And the best part is that it's month to month. No contracts, no hidden fees, no nothing.

And if you use promo code unstoppable30, you'll get 30% off for your first month on us. Just go to bffcreative.co, pick your plan, and sign up today. So that's the quick way to start to fix things, right?

Is to create the right kind of content and and develop a ad's first focus. And then you can kind of start to dive into okay, how do we, how do we, how do we have some smaller wins organically, and then start to go for some of the home runs. Yeah. So and again, we're we keep talking about this.

Your ads should be wide. It's a wide, I don't want to say wide net, but like you need different fishing nets. Totally. Like you're not, it's no longer that you can just go out there with the same you need diversity stuff.

You need different kinds of strategies for different personas. 100%. Um, and product skews. But on the organic side, you should still have some consistency.

Like you should still figure it out. Like, what is it? Like people still want to hear stories, people still want to be attached to something, people still want to identify with something. And so, like, how do you now do that in a in the new age?

Yeah. And the concept, I think that I think the if you if you were to distill organic down into one question, or like, yeah, one question, it's like, will someone will someone share this with someone else? That's probably how you have to look at it. Well, we know that that's one of the strongest signals for the algorithm.

What I mean is shares the main strongest signal. And organically. Going back to what's meta's goal. It keeps people on the platform.

Guess what sharing does? Yeah. It takes you and now brings somebody else to it. Right.

Gets people on the platform. Yeah. In a way that nothing else, like liking, that doesn't do it. No, saving saving doesn't as much either.

It used to be a bigger indicator, and it's not as much because so many people save things and never go back and look at them. But sharing's completely different. So it's probably between sharing and commenting. Those are things that are gonna keep you longest.

Yeah, because commenting sometimes is a form of sharing because you'll get tagged. Yeah, and and it and also you're commenting with the expectation generally to receive something back. Yeah. A lot of times, you know.

And so it starts a conversation. And so yeah, I think I think the big question is okay, how do how do I create a piece of content that gets other people talking about it? Gets other people sharing about it. Like that's that's interesting.

I want to share that with my wife. Oh, that's interesting. Like I'm sending that to the boys. I need to send this over to Mark.

I just sent you a piece like of content. I mean, you and me are sharing you content all the time with each other. And so that's well, that is what you do with the best ones. Yeah, exactly.

Like you don't like, I I don't even like things anymore. Like I do. It's like mostly I'm just yeah, I'm the same way. I only like things when I'm supporting someone.

That's what I've recognized. If it's somebody I like or I want to support them or a friend or whatever, that's when I'm liking things. But when you find something really funny or really interesting or on point, yeah, that's when you're oh, that's relevant. Yeah.

And and that and that's like the focus here is I was I was actually, I mean, it's we just ended baseball season, so I was thinking about this with my son, right? Because he was um he was, you know, talking about wanting to hit home runs and like, oh, I want to be able to like get stronger and hit home runs and you know, all this stuff. And I I just I did some like basic like Gemini work around like, okay, you know, I I threw out some strategies around like, okay, cool, if I've got a base hit percentage of XYZ as a baseball team versus a like doubles, triples, and home runs percentage.

You know, money ball with Gemini? Yeah, exactly. Like at what point at what point do you know doubles, triples, and home runs outpace singles? And it's you gotta be hitting a lot of this in order for just single base hits for it to ever outpace single base hits.

And I remember, and I was even telling my son this, I remember I went to a Yankees because singles advanced people. Well, again, like when we talk about surface area, like how do you just get more at-bats or whatever it's called? Yeah, but like singles in this at bat analogy, what is it doing? It's increasing your probability of scoring.

Yeah, because now you have instead of a home run and you have one person who scores, depending on who's on base or not, if you're hitting base hits, you have you could have two, three people on base at any given time. And then if you have another base hit, a good one, if you have three people on base with just three singles, that gives you the odds of a one score to a four. Exactly. Goes up exponentially, right?

100%. Yeah, we I and I I use this example. Like I took my son to his very first game. We're big Yankees fans, and so we took uh we were at Disneyland, and so I took him to a Dodgers Yankees game.

And Aaron Judge hit three home runs in a game, which is like statistically, the probability of three home runs is like an 80% win rate. Like that's crazy. But but the Yankees didn't hit any base hits the whole time. And they lost by 20 to 3.

They only scored three runs because they didn't have anybody on base. Aaron Judge scored three times the and the Dodgers scored 20 runs. Yeah. It was like 12 to 1 in the second inning.

It's crazy. So the point the r the point that I'm bringing up here is consistent just wins. So define what getting on base is. Define what a single is.

A single is in social media, how do you get on base? Uh is taking yourself from creating content that that is not getting any distribution. So let's just say like you're in the 500 to maybe 5,000 range, depending on how big you are from a views perspective. Right?

Naturally, if you you know, you know, um, or or maybe uh 50 to 150 likes, just not a lot, right? To increasing that, let's say by 50 to 75% consistently. Those are good singles. If you can take yourself from a couple thousand views or less, uh, you know, up to five to ten thousand views on your videos, those are amazing singles.

Obviously, this is relative to uh where you are currently at in this world and where you used to be. Yes, right? So it's really hard for me. Like if you used to be getting, you know, 100,000 views and now you're at 20,000 views, 20,000 views is still good, but you're you need to now get yourself up to like this 30,000, 40,000.

That's what I mean. It's like, okay, let's increase by 50 to 75% consistently. And then your singles or your doubles are doubling that. So if you go from 10,000 to 20,000, that's a good double.

And then every now and then you go viral. I think virality is a hundred thousand or more, you know, from a views perspective. So a good way of doing this, like if you're looking at like I'm looking at a social media profile right now. I'm not gonna tell you who it is.

Okay. But out of their last, and I'm gonna fudge these numbers, but the ratios will be they'll be the same. So out of the last five posts, let's call it 10,000, 10,000, 8,000 views, 10,000 views, and then you have 50,000. The biggest difference is that all of these have around 10 shares.

The one that had 50,000 has over 500 shares. Totally. So when you're talking about singles, it's like, hey, focus on that. Yep.

What's the what's the the difference here with the shareability? The shareability of this piece of content. Yeah. Focus on what made it different.

What is it? Was it value? Was it relatability? This one's for sure relatability.

Was it uh like entertainment in a way that, oh my gosh, like I gotta share, I gotta share that with my wife? You know, value, oh I need to share this with Mark. This is really good information we could talk about. You know, or that pure relatability of like, oh my gosh, I used to do that in high school all the time.

I gotta share this with my buddy. And that's what I would do. I just like go through your social and figure out what your singles are. You know, and maybe those other four pieces of content led to that one that took off.

Yeah. So we're not, and then that's the whole point, right? Is like maybe singles for them is getting that 10 to 50 share ratio. Yep.

Well, how do you do that every day? Or how do you do that? And then what what makes that other thing shareable? Was it just relatable relatability?

The other ones might might be product. Yeah. Like we get it. Sometimes product needs to be there, but totally.

Yeah, my most viral videos are all the ones that just by far the most shares. Like maybe product doesn't need to be there. It doesn't. Like maybe your social doesn't need to show product much.

And and I would argue I don't know. I would are I mean, I do know. Like I would argue that if you go look at some of the best performing brand and brand pieces of content, unless it's a is it a unless it is a problem solution product, the the product is the secondary piece to everything. Like go look, go look at unless there's a story behind it.

Go look at Brita's Brita water filter. Pull that up right now. Okay. Go look at Brita Waterfilter's Instagram account, TikTok account, either one.

It's completely crazy. It looks like I mean, Brita has been around since the 70s, by the way. My life is falling apart. I looked at this.

They've been around since I think 72 or something. Like my grandma had Brita filters when I was growing up. Oh my gosh, dude. This one has And all they're doing.

This reel has 356,000 shares. Yes. All they're doing is just creating content. My life is falling apart.

That has nothing to do with the Brita water filter, but the Brita water water filter is in every piece of content. So, for example, like I saw one piece where it was like, this is how you get rid of a stain. And it and they pour like wine on this shaggy rug. And all they do is just pour all of the water from a Brita water filter on it.

And it's not actually getting the stain out, you know? Oh my god. And it's just like they just are doing this the most acidine things and they're getting massive reach. Is it working?

Yes, you're seeing Google trends go up for Brita water filter. I don't know if it's bringing sales, but if you take the old adage that search, you know, sales always follow search, then I would assume sales are coming in from that. But it's just crazy. And they're not focused on, oh, we get rid of 99.

9% of all, you know, bacteria in water. They don't talk about that ever. Because no one needs to know that anymore. They just need to know that it's a water filter.

Like everyone knows they've got this like heritage legacy brand. Oh my gosh, dude. Yeah, these guys are. Isn't it completely unhinged?

It is unhinged. That's the best way to yeah. Like they they don't even care. It reminds you of like Nutter Butter.

Remember when Nutter Butter did this like six years ago or something like that, five years ago. So anyways. Wild animations, like cheap, 3D pixelated. Characters.

But this stuff is just crazy. So figure out what's shareable, and that's your way to get your get back on the organic train. I think we're kind of beating a dead horse here, but I think I think that that's probably they just filled up a burrito with water. Yeah.

Like they just a little midnight snack. They're just doing stupid weird stuff. 70,000 shares. Yeah.

Yeah, exactly. Because it's so 2.6 million views. It's so wildly crazy.

That was back on March 18th. Yeah, like this is That's the extreme, right? It's the extreme because we understand this might not fit everyone else. Everyone.

Yeah. But the point being is like just go look at their shares. Like that's that's how you know. So like find out what is your base hit, what does that look like?

What's a single? Measure it. Yep. And if if that's all you're focusing on as as a as a company, I think you'll find that you'll you'll get there.

Yeah, you'll start to see. Don't look at view, like almost don't think about it in views anymore. Just think about it in shares. Yeah, what Trevor said.

How will someone share this? That is like every brand effort you do, that it should probably just be the question you ask anything. Is this shareable? Because if it's not, if it's not shareable, then it's it just blends in and and nobody cares about it enough.

It's just gonna be a filler. Yeah. Which sometimes you need fillers, but yeah, is this collaboration with this influencer shareable? Are people gonna talk about this?

If no, don't do it. Is this bit we do with the team? Like, are people gonna share this? If not, is it gonna grow their brand?

Probably not. Get your paid figured out though first. I think that's priority number one, right? Understand just the the new math, get your paid figured out, and then start to hit some singles with organic.

Um, and as you're hitting those singles, you'll start hitting more doubles. You'll start to see that you're hitting, you know, homers, and you'll start to get you'll you'll start to see your the divergent in organic and paid in a good way, the way you want it to. Right now, this is this is paid and this is this is uh this is sorry, this is organic and this is paid here, right? You want it to be almost the other way around.

So, or instead, maybe this way, right? Organic is going up and paid is going up. So all right, guys. We'll call it quits here.

Yes, have a good one. Chao, ciao, see ya. Buenos días. Thank you for listening to the Unstoppable Marketer Podcast.

If there's a brand campaign strategy or marketing tactic that you want us to review, please DM me at the TrevorCrump on Instagram or TikTok or at the Unstoppable Marketer Podcast. And of course, if you got value from this episode or if you like it whatsoever, please make sure you're subscribing, you're liking, you're following, and for sure go leave us a review to let us know that we're doing a good job. We will see you guys next time.

Related episodes across the Index

Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.

  • Ep. 198 - How to Make Your SaaS Company More FundableSaaS Backwards · on Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC)94 / 100
  • Why Marketing Attribution Breaks on Subscription ModelsMarketing Analytics with Fexingo · on Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC)92 / 100
  • I Was Worth $5 Million at 23. Eight Months Later I Was Negative $1 Million | Ep. 416 with Leo Pareja CEO of eXp RealtyFounder's Story · on Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC)88 / 100
  • When to Raise VC - and When It Destroys DisciplineStartuprad.io™ · on Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC)85 / 100
  • Why Revenue Is Up But Profit Isn't Moving: The Unit Economics Blind Spot Most Shopify Brands Have - Misha Druzhinin | Why Revenue Doesn’t Equal Profit, Why Scaling Profit Beats Scaling Revenue, The Hidden Danger Of Discounts (#481)Ecommerce Coffee Break · on Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC)82 / 100
  • Selling a SaaS Business? The Metrics Buyers Care About Most Business Beyond You · on Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC)80 / 100

More from The Unstoppable Marketer®

All episodes →
  • Ep. 154 Why Your ROAS Is Holding Your Brand Back59 / 100
  • EP. 152 The Secret Sauce Behind 300 Million Views: Lessons from Adidas72 / 100
  • Ep. 151 | Why Most Subscription Brands Fail (It’s Not Retention)95 / 100
  • Ep 150 | Why Your Email Strategy Is About to Stop Working64 / 100
  • Ep 149 | This Brand Went From $4B to $39M… Here’s Why55 / 100
Explore the best B2B Marketing podcasts →
All The Unstoppable Marketer® episodes →