The Pre-Read · 2026-07-20 · 24 min
Most climate risk assessments are missing hazards, scoping too narrowly, and leaving physical climate risk under-analyzed. Linda Romanovska helped write the rules, and she’s here to explain what better reporting looks like. As co-author of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards and a member of the EU Sustainability Reporting Board, Linda has spent 20 years working on climate risk assessment across sectors and jurisdictions. She joined The Pre-Read to break down what mandatory climate-related financial disclosure requires. In this episode: Why most climate risk assessments assess too few hazards The key differences between physical climate risk and transition risk How to scope scenarios and time horizons without cutting corners What climate-related financial disclosure users want to see Where AI is making climate risk assessment faster and more audit-ready
Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.
Who Owns What Your AI Does?85 / 100
Restatement Is a Dirty Word, Except When It Isn't68 / 100
Markets Are Moving: Is Your Finance Team?
Are You Taking Enough Risk? Probably Not.
The Strategic Compass: Navigating the Intersection of GRC and Sustainability
