The B2B Podcast Index
Index
All categories
MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
MethodologySubmit
Best of:MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
An independent project byFame
SearchBest episodesGuestsInsightsMethodologySubmit a podcast
Index/Leadership/The LeaderLab: Powered by LifeLabs Learning
The LeaderLab: Powered by LifeLabs Learning artwork

How to Lead Through Change Using the CAMPS™ Check with Brendon Nimphius

The LeaderLab: Powered by LifeLabs Learning · 2025-07-18 · 13 min

0:00--:--

Key moments - from our scoring

Substance score

58 / 100

Five dimensions, 20 points each

Insight Density13 / 20
Originality11 / 20
Guest Caliber12 / 20
Specificity & Evidence10 / 20
Conversational Craft12 / 20

Leading change requires more than announcing decisions - it demands understanding how change affects employees' brains and psychological needs. Brendon Nimphius walks through LifeLabs Learning's CAMPS™ Check framework, which reframes the traditional listening tour or stakeholder analysis into a structured conversation about five core psychological cravings. Rather than simply collecting feedback, leaders ask targeted questions to identify where change creates perceived opportunities (green lights) and threats (red lights) across Certainty (reducing uncertainty), Autonomy (sense of control), Meaning (connection to purpose), Progress (speed and effort), and Social Inclusion (fairness and group dynamics). Nimphius shares concrete examples - like why unacknowledged worries get magnified, how to address the sunk cost fallacy when people have invested effort in old systems, and why data-driven efficiency claims matter more than vague promises. He emphasizes that honest acknowledgment of constraints (like "you don't have a say in this change") actually builds trust. Leaders deploying this framework should use it in one-on-ones and dedicated leading change workshops available through LifeLabs Learning.

Key takeaways

  • →Ask employees what they're worried about during change, not to magnify concerns but to prevent them from becoming magnified through avoidance and silence.
  • →Address autonomy directly by being honest about whether employees have input - validation that a choice is out of their control reduces resistance more than pretending it isn't.
  • →Provide data-backed evidence for efficiency claims (e.g., specific time savings) rather than vague promises, or employees will resist and revert to familiar systems.
  • →Acknowledge the sunk cost fallacy by letting people grieve the loss of effort invested in old systems before fully embracing new ones.
  • →Use the CAMPS™ Check in listening tours to map where change helps or hurts employees' psychological needs, then link mitigation efforts back to organizational meaning and purpose.

Guests

Brendon Nimphius

Topics in this episode

sunk cost fallacyListening toursStakeholder analysisCAMPS™ Check frameworkPsychological needs in change managementCertainty (reduction of uncertainty)Autonomy (sense of control)Meaning (purpose-driven change)Progress (learning curve and efficiency)Social Inclusion (fairness and group dynamics)

Questions this episode answers

What is the CAMPS™ Check and how does it differ from a traditional listening tour?

The CAMPS™ Check is a framework built on five psychological needs (Certainty, Autonomy, Meaning, Progress, Social Inclusion) that leaders use during listening tours to identify where change creates perceived opportunities or threats. Rather than just collecting generic feedback, you ask targeted questions and listen for which of these psychological cravings will be helped or harmed by the change, then address threats with empathy or mitigation.

Why should leaders ask employees what they're worried about during change?

When worries go unacknowledged, they get magnified and fuel greater uncertainty. Employees then wonder if they're missing critical information or if leaders are avoiding the topic. By asking and empathizing with concerns, leaders prevent escalation and build trust.

How do you address the loss employees feel when switching from a familiar system to a new one?

Acknowledge the sunk cost fallacy - the time and effort people invested in organizing their old workflows. Let them grieve this loss explicitly rather than dismissing it, then connect the change to organizational meaning and purpose to provide a pathway forward.

What data should leaders have ready when claiming a change will improve efficiency?

Leaders should quantify anticipated time savings with specific benchmarks or evidence (e.g., "this will save you 30% of your one-on-one prep time") rather than making vague efficiency claims. Without data, employees default to resisting change because the old way feels safer.

How does the CAMPS™ Check address fairness concerns during change?

Ask people how they perceive fairness - whether their workload is changing more than others, whether some groups are impacted differently. Be honest if impact is uneven, and link that burden back to meaning (why that work matters) or mitigate the imbalance where possible.

What our scoring noted

Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.

Insight Density

13 / 20

The episode provides a structured framework (CAMPS) with practical application to change leadership, offering moderately novel thinking about psychological needs during transitions. However, substantial portions consist of repetitive explanations and basic psychology (uncertainty is hard, people resist change), which many experienced leaders would already know. The core insight - that listening tours should address specific psychological needs rather than just collect feedback - is valuable but not densely packed.

When you're worried about something and no one acknowledges that, then they become magnified
People talk about improving efficiency all the time, but they come with no data

Originality

11 / 20

The CAMPS framework itself is presented as proprietary LifeLabs methodology but maps closely to established change management concepts (listening tours, stakeholder analysis). The psychological anchoring to brain function and specific cravings adds some structure, but the underlying ideas - that change triggers uncertainty, loss of control, and fairness concerns - are well-established in organizational psychology literature. The framing is fresher than the substance.

what we call the camps check, which for others would maybe compare it to what you might call a listening tour
Brain cravings really just deals with psychological needs

Guest Caliber

12 / 20

Brendon Nimphius is a facilitator and workshop leader at LifeLabs with a decade in organizational development and psychology background, but the transcript provides no evidence of scaled operational experience. He appears to be a skilled practitioner and trainer rather than a senior executive or founder who has led organizational change at meaningful scale. His examples are mostly illustrative rather than demonstrating personal executive decision-making at high stakes.

one of our facilitation managers at LifeLabs
I had an opportunity to facilitate workshops with Harry's

Specificity & Evidence

10 / 20

The episode lacks concrete data, named examples, or quantified outcomes. The Harry's workshop mention is not detailed. The performance management system anecdote is personal but not evidenced. The opening statistics (76% and 73% of HR leaders) are mentioned without source or context. No metrics, timelines, financial impact, or comparative results support claims about effectiveness of the CAMPS check.

76% of HR leaders say their managers are overwhelmed, and 73% say that they're not equipped to lead change
I had an opportunity to facilitate workshops with Harry's and when they were going through change

Conversational Craft

12 / 20

Michaela asks straightforward follow-up questions that move through the framework systematically ("Tell me a little bit about autonomy," "Talk me through M, meaning"), but these are largely softball prompts designed to let the guest walk through prepared material. There is no push-back, no challenge to the framework's efficacy, no probing into alternative approaches, and no genuinely difficult questions that would test the depth of thinking. The conversation reads as guided rather than exploratory.

Tell me a little bit about autonomy
Talk me through M, meaning

Conversation analysis

Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.

Most-used words

change28leaders11impact10camps9leader7call7lifelabs6back6listening6leading6questions6progress6goals5check5brain5hard5

Episode notes

Change is hard, especially on the brain. In this episode, LifeLabs Learning Facilitaton Manager Brendon Nimphius introduces the CAMPS Check - a science-backed framework that helps leaders anticipate the psychological impact of change. Learn how to use Certainty, Autonomy, Meaning, Progress, and Social Inclusion to listen better, lead more effectively, and reduce resistance. Whether you're navigating a reorg, new process, or cultural shift, this episode will give you simple, actionable tools to lead through change with clarity and care. CAMPS Resources: Article: What’s Your CAMPS Score? Article: CAMPS: The Best Model for Leading Change at Work Workshop: Effective 1-1s Video: CAMPS Video Leading Change Resources: Playbook Leading Change In Uncertain Times Workshop: Leading Change Article: Decoding the Secrets to Change Resilience Template: Change Checklist

Full transcript

13 min

Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.

Welcome to the Leader Lab Podcast. I'm Michaela Mathery, Chief Marketing Officer at LifeLabs Learning. If you're a senior people leader, you're navigating a workplace that's changing faster than ever, and you're not alone. 76% of HR leaders say their managers are overwhelmed, and 73% say that they're not equipped to lead change.

This season, we're exploring what it really takes to build resilient, adaptable, and effective leaders, managers, and teams. If you're a returning listener, welcome back. When we launched the Leader Lab over five years ago, our goal was simple, deliver 11-minute episodes packed with tipping point skills, small behavioral changes that make a big impact. We're continuing with that format and adding something new, interviews with senior people leaders from various organizations.

You'll hear how they prioritize, make decisions, and solve the toughest people challenges. Today's episode features one of our expert facilitators, someone who's helped us train over 500,000 people around the world. Our goal today, you'll leave with the tool or tactic that you can use right away. Let's dive in.

Welcome back to the Leader Lab podcast. I have the amazing Brendan Nimphius with us, who is one of our facilitation managers at LifeLabs. Brendan has been in the world of organizational development and coaching for over a decade and also has a background in organizational psychology. So welcome to the Leader Lab.

Hi, Michaela. Thank you. Excited to have you. One of our core kind of philosophies at LifeLabs is this concept of tipping point skills.

And we really apply that to our content across the board. So we want to make sure that we're always giving small changes that can have a huge impact. And that's one of our goals today is really just to give folks a tool that they can immediately apply after listening to this episode. You know, speaking of the episode, Kristen, change and leading through change.

Yes. I had an opportunity to facilitate workshops with Harry's and when they were going through change. And one of the things we focused really heavily on with the their teams was what we call the camps check, which for others would maybe compare it to what you might call a listening tour. And listening tours is just a technical term used in change management.

Other people call it a stakeholder analysis or a stakeholder check, where you kind of guess, right? You go out and you listen to people's sentiments, their worries, their concerns, even collecting feedback on change that you're going to be leading through at the company. So today, I just wanted to give our listeners a chance to lead better just by Thank you. These are at LifeLives what we call like our brain cravings.

Brain cravings really just deals with psychological needs. When we think about change, it's important but often overlooked that we anticipate or even respond to the psychological impact of change. You know, people like change is hard. It's like, well, what is it hard on?

It's like it's hard on your brain in many ways. So it's going to help us actually understand when we're doing a listening tour, like where is this change going to have a positive impact on camps and where might it have negative impact or a perceived threat? What is that application? Yeah.

A lot of times when people use the listening tour, it's going to be a set of questions and then a set of stakeholders. And your intention is to ask the same questions to the stakeholders and you're collecting information. And sometimes when you collect that information, you can hear, again, like you can hear the opportunities, call those green lights, and then you can hear our threats, call those red lights. A camps check works that way, where you can ask questions and listen for where are their perceived opportunities in these areas.

Your cravings might be met. And or I now know by asking you these questions how to meet that craving. And then also the threats, of course, like, oh, that might be like an ouch on your brain. And I might need to, as a leader, just empathize with that.

Like, oh, wow, like that's going to hurt in that area or it is going to be tough for you. Or again, like do things that might mitigate the impact or the threat in that area. So we can start with certainty. Sure.

I mean, that's arguably the biggest one because your brain's job is just to just to reduce uncertainty. It's like one of its primary functions. When you think about any change, there's just that level of uncertainty that comes into play. And so you could argue like one of the biggest threats for leaders when they're dealing with change is not anticipating and addressing potential uncertainty.

So I think like one of the first questions that you might even ask in a listening tour is just, what are you worried about? And one thing that I've heard from leaders in the past, coaching them to change, is they tell me like, Brendan, why would we want to bring that up? We don't want them to be thinking what they're worried And I just find that fascinating because when you're worried about something and no one acknowledges that, then they become magnified. Like they're bigger for you and you become even more uncertain because you're like, not only am I concerned about this or am I wondering, should I know this?

Do I need to know this? What's the plan going to be? But I have someone who's possibly actively avoiding that information. So it's like one of the first places that I really suggest leaders go is like ask people what they're worried about, not as a way to magnify those things, as a way to listen, empathize.

Because if you don't, then they will get magnified. Yes. So we talked about certainty. Tell me a little bit about autonomy.

Yeah, let's talk about autonomy. Autonomy for, you know, how we define it is our craving for control. Even for things in which there might or almost definitely is a positive at the end of the tunnel, right? Think about like you got to go to school, right?

Everyone needs to go to school because you learn and that's how you get smarter and that's how you get a job. All of those things seemingly are positive, but we were kind of like pushed and forced to go. So we're like, I don't want to. Anytime in life when we were forced to do something, there's alarm bells go off.

Because it's impacting our craving for control. And so when we are leading change, we have to be clear and honest with ourselves. Like, are we imposing it? And we usually are.

And we're doing it for good reasons. I think a lot of CEOs and executives, they understand the benefit and they're clear on that. And so it's maybe not occur to them like, oh, well, you know, this is everyone should just buy in that. No, we do need to address that.

So leaders going out there and just trying to find out, like, how is this received in terms of, you know, how much of a say do you actually want in this change? Like even asking that question and being honest with yourself, like do they get a say or do they not? And being honest with employees in that area, like you do not have a say in this and we get that, you know, and I think that's important to bring up so that people feel validated and like, oh, I crave control, but this one's out of my control.

And this one's out of my control. Amazing. Talk me through M, meaning. The meaning.

Human beings, we have a craving for purpose. We talk a lot about purpose-driven organizations, purpose-driven cultures, you know, leading with Y. As change leaders doing a camp check just trying to find out like what do you foresee is the goal of this change interesting actually like see how people perceive it how might this change impact your goals individually even if they're individual contributors like how might it actually link with or link up to your goals your initiatives also then being clear with employees how is it impacting our mission how is it impacting especially if your team's goals your individual goals I think a lot of people join organizations for their values and their mission especially right and so So if you can link change with this is actually something that we value around here, like at LifeLabs, like this is going to help us.

We have a value, which is cut the clutter, which is like remove extraneous steps, remove waste, make things more efficient. So if we were to implement change at LifeLabs, we might say like, hey, this is going to help us cut the clutter because that makes it more meaningful. You know, when we don't give people a powerful why statement, you're just more likely to get resistance. Like you're not going to get the buy-in.

So yeah, I'd say capital M for meaning in the camps. All right. We talked through CAM Let's talk about P. What does that bring us to?

Progress. This is my sensitivity area. All right. Progress.

You have to think about dealing with, you know, people say change is hard. And I think one of those things that's hard for people is learning something new. And that takes time. So, you know, when we think about progress, a couple of the questions we tell managers to ask or think about is, will this speed me up or slow me down?

And I think that being honest with people around like how much this might slow you down. What are you going to have to unlearn and relearn? You know, how much time are we going to spend doing this? As much as like we want to improve processes and make things more efficient, people have become efficient at the current way that they're doing it.

So if you can collect concerns about that, and then if you can, as a leader, provide any evidence of here's how this is going to speed you up. People talk about improving efficiency all the time, but they come with no data. And I've talked to so many leaders about this. I go like, oh, how much time do you anticipate this is going to save your employees?

And I've done this in leading change workshops. I've done this in coaching conversations. They're like, well, and they have like nothing, not even a benchmark. And I say like, you're going to lose people in that way.

And they will resist. They'll use systems. They'll keep going back to the old way that they were doing it. Because again, it just feels like the pathway of least resistance.

So progress, there's the, will this slow me down? Will this speed me up type of progress. And then this other aspect of progress is the wasted effort. Whenever, you know, we're asking someone to do something new or like they're giving up essentially what they used to do.

And for some, this could be really big. You know, for me, I had to transition from one system to another. Now this new system of doing one-on-ones, sharing feedback. It was a performance management system.

It was going to make things easier. It was better than the Google Docs and spreadsheets I was using. I really hated it. Like I resisted it for like six months because I had spent so much time and effort organizing these documents, organizing the spreadsheet in the way that I liked it.

All of my notes are there. Everything is there. I had made such an investment. So go back to sunk in cost.

Yes. Fallacy. The sunk cost fallacy, right? Yeah.

So I think that's something else for leaders to really not overlook is your changes. Like, ooh, rah. Yeah. Yes.

You really have to grieve on some of the loss of what we've already invested. So now we're on to the last one. And so at LifeLabs, it's social inclusion. And when you think about social inclusion, there's a couple of considerations here.

And one of them is like, how is this change going to impact group dynamics? How is it going to impact what we call it, our organization, our culture? So those are like the first considerations. I think that's like a fair question to ask people, you know, with any change is like, how do you anticipate this?

Yeah. Oh, all right. Yeah. back to childhood because like it reinforces the camps check how this really deals with cravings whether you went to school you're part of a friend group especially if you had siblings you had siblings or a lot yeah right and you see even like parents with multiple children they have this and I don't yeah why do they get to go here and I don't like we are wired we are wired for that social dynamic of what do I have that someone else doesn't and it is it's built into our survival why do they have this and I don't and when it comes to change that's one of other thing that leaders don't listen for is what are people's concerns about fairness?

Because is their workload changing? Am I not? Am I going through this change and they're not? Who's being impacted more than I am?

And I think that addressing that and being clear of here's how this change is going to impact you versus someone else and not to be dishonest and say, oh, everyone's going through this when in fact, actually, like your workload right now is going to increase by X percent. You're the ones who are actually at the forefront of this right now you're going to be taking on a lot of the brunt of this work. But then you get a chance to address that elephant in the room and then maybe link it back up to meaning again.

Like that's why the work you're doing right now matters so much. Or again, here's how we're going to mitigate that lack of fairness about how this is impacting you versus other people. Again, sort of addressing the thing that might be the big worry at the top of the conversation, but giving folks kind of like the guidance on how to do that. Thank you so much for joining us, Brendan.

I learned a lot and I think we gave our listeners some really practical tools. If folks are interested in deploying tools like the camps model at the organization, do you have any advice for them? Of course I do. And we teach our camps model in our effective one-on-ones workshop, really just dealing with empowering performance and engagement.

and using camps actually to do that. And then our leading change workshop, of course. I encourage everyone, if you are not familiar with the camps model, to jump into the show notes. We're going to link a couple of helpful resources and actually provide a template that you could turn around and use in your next one-on-one.

Related episodes across the Index

Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.

  • Would You Risk It All for a Shot at Building a Billion-Dollar Brand With Gordon Ramsay?Behind the Brand with Bryan Elliott · on sunk cost fallacy88 / 100
  • How to Sell Against a Competitor Already in the BuildingSales Leadership with Fexingo · on sunk cost fallacy85 / 100
  • Episode 70: The Skills You’re Ignoring Might Be Your Biggest Advantage with Omar ZenhomLean Marketing · on sunk cost fallacy80 / 100
  • SIPOC: start improvement rightThe Lean Solutions Podcast · on Stakeholder analysis77 / 100
  • Stakeholder Analysis And The Art Of Listening With Melissa ShermanQuality Time With MoreSteam · on Stakeholder analysis75 / 100
  • 426: How to listen like a (real) leader - with Dr. Adam HickmanThe Simplifiers Podcast · on Listening tours70 / 100

More from The LeaderLab: Powered by LifeLabs Learning

All episodes →
  • Preparing for a Defining Moment: The Obama Foundation's Investment in Leadership65 / 100
  • Inside Fabletics: How L&D is Preparing for an AI-First Future with Will Feng80 / 100
  • AI in Learning & Leadership: Why Human Skills Still Win with Priscila Bala and Michelle King82 / 100
  • Harry’s & Flamingo: “It’s Us, We’re the Problem” with Kristen Correa Blanco, Head of People82 / 100
  • Grow Kind: The Leader Level Wrap Up58 / 100
Explore the best B2B Leadership podcasts →
All The LeaderLab: Powered by LifeLabs Learning episodes →