
Revenue Rehab · 2025-08-06 · 27 min
Key moments - from our scoring
Substance score
48 / 100
Five dimensions, 20 points each
Lorraine Ball's turnaround of a crisis-level marketing department offers a masterclass in diagnosing and solving retention problems at scale. Inheriting a 48-person creative services team losing one person weekly, Ball discovered the core issue wasn't compensation - the company was already offering bonuses and paying recruiters $10K per placement - but rather poor role fit and rigid working conditions that failed to account for creative work's nature. By implementing flexible scheduling (expanding team availability from 8-5 to 7am-7pm at no additional cost), personally learning every employee's name and skills, and strategically buffering her team from senior management pressure, she eliminated turnover entirely within 12 weeks. The financial impact was immediate: $120K annual savings in recruiting fees plus elimination of 300+ daily backorders in literature production (dropping to zero in December). With full capacity restored, the team gained bandwidth to pursue higher-value work with clients like Indianapolis Motor Speedway, Indianapolis Zoo, and IndyStar. Ball's approach emphasizes leadership alignment, transparent role negotiations, and viewing team capacity as an efficiency problem rather than purely a hiring problem.
In Ball's 48-person marketing department, eliminating weekly resignations saved approximately $120,000 annually in recruiting fees alone (at $10K per placement with weekly turnover), plus indirect savings from eliminating backorders and recovered productivity.
Ball found the core issue was that people felt interchangeable and misaligned with their roles - managers were treating graphic designers and writers like accounting positions with rigid assignments, rather than recognizing individual skill differences and fit.
By allowing team members to set their own 8-hour schedules based on peak productivity (some starting at 7am, others at 10am), Ball extended team availability from 8-5 to 7am-7pm, adding four hours of daily capacity at zero additional cost.
In Ball's case, it took 12 weeks (three months) of consistent implementation - flexible scheduling, role alignment, and cultural changes - before reaching the milestone of a full Friday and Monday without a resignation.
First, identify the actual problem (not money) by talking directly to employees; second, build credibility with smaller wins before tackling the biggest structural issues; third, engage existing senior leaders early rather than top-down fixing alone.
Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.
The episode contains real, embedded lessons (buffer your team from structural dysfunction, pick small wins first, flexible scheduling as a capacity argument rather than a perk) but the insights-per-minute ratio is low because the host's long interjections largely restate what the guest just said rather than extend the ideas, and the travel opener is pure fluff.
if you see a really big problem, that's not the one you tackle first. It's not. Because if you fail, you got no place to go. Pick a smaller one. Get that win.
I had to literally go into battle and get in between my team and the senior VPs and my team and the other department managers and be that interface because that energy, those expectations, all of that was weighing us down
Most advice recycles standard management wisdom (know your people, put them in the right roles, build allies), but the reframe of flexible scheduling as 'adding four hours of capacity for free' and the point about negotiating working conditions - not just salary - in interviews are mildly non-obvious tactical angles that lift the score slightly above baseline.
Everybody teaches you how to negotiate for salary. Nobody teaches you how to negotiate for your working conditions.
I'm going to add four hours a day to my team's capability. And it's not going to cost you a dime.
Lorraine Ball is a genuine practitioner describing something she personally executed at scale - not borrowed theory - which is valuable, but she is now primarily a speaker, podcast host, and small-business consultant, giving the episode a mild thought-leader drift; she doesn't bring depth across multiple companies or sectors.
when I was in a situation with a department with 100% turnover, our out of stock was out of control. We were 300 items on any given day
we started doing graphic design work for the Indianapolis Motor Speedway, the Indianapolis Zoo. We did some work for the IndyStar
The episode includes several concrete anchors - $10K per recruiting fee, ~$100K annual savings, 300 backorders reduced to zero, a 12-week milestone, 18 months of zero turnover, and named clients - which is above average for this format, though the unnamed insurance company and unmeasured revenue impact from solving the backorder crisis leave meaningful specificity on the table.
We were probably spending about $10,000 a month on recruiting fees. So right off the bat, we were saving $100,000
We were 300 items on any given day. And the shipping department told me if I could get that to 100, I would be a hero
The host asks a few legitimate follow-up questions (pushing on the structural vs. predecessor framing, and how Lorraine built the political capital to fight upward) but spends far more airtime in lengthy restatements and thematic tangents than in probing; there is no pushback on any claim, and the episode opens with several minutes of travel small talk.
So I'd love to hear you talk more about how you approached that piece of it, because it sounds like this is one of those things that it was very much a little bit of ask for permission, but a lot of more of the ask for forgiveness and not permission.
And that is a really good lesson for all of us. I think we especially get caught in that trap when we're coming into a new role.
Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.
This week on Revenue Rehab, Brandi Starr is joined by Lorraine Ball, an accomplished entrepreneur and marketing leader. Together, they break down how Lorraine transformed a marketing department plagued by constant resignations and instability into a high-performing , fully retained team. They discuss Lorraine's decisive strategies, including team realignment, personalized work scheduling, and proactive leadership that delivered measurable savings and capacity gains. If you're looking for actionable ways to create aligned, resilient revenue teams, this episode is for you. Revenue leaders who've been in the trenches share how they tackled real challenges - what worked, what didn't , and what you can apply to your own strategy. These episodes go beyond theory, breaking down real-world implementation stories with concrete examples, step-by-step insights, and measurable outcomes. Bullet Points of Key Topics + Chapter Markers: Topic #1: Diagnosing and Addressing Team Turnover Crisis [03:40] Lorraine Ball shares how she inherited a department where "one person a week at least was quitting," creating massive instability and high recruiting costs.
Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.
What happens when your team is so broken, someone quits every single week? That's the crisis Lorraine Ball walked into. As the new VP, she inherited a marketing department in free fall. 48 people and not a single week without resignation.
18 months later, zero turnover, K saved in recruiting costs, and a team so efficient they had to find new work to fill extra capacity. This is more than a Culture Win. It's a masterclass in how leadership alignment and team design can directly impact revenue. Stick around.
You'll want to hear how she pulled this off. Welcome to Revenue Rehab, your one-stop destination for collective solutions to the biggest challenges faced by marketing leaders today. Now head on over to the couch, make yourself comfortable, and get ready to change the way you approach revenue. Leading your recovery is modern marketer, author, speaker, and chief operating officer at Tegrita, Brandi Starr.
Hello, hello, hello, and welcome to another episode of Revenue Rehab. I am your host, Brandi Starr, and we have another amazing episode for you today. In traditional therapy, we learn just as much from others' breakthroughs as we do from our own. So today, we will explore how Lorraine Ball transformed a marketing department plagued by 100% turnover into a high-retention, high-impact team.
What she changed, how she did it, and what every marketing leader can learn to drive alignment, momentum, and measurable business results. Lorraine Ball is a entrepreneur, author, and speaker who traded corporate red tape and bad coffee for a mission to help small businesses thrive. As the host of the podcast, More Than a Few Words, she brings decades of real-world marketing experience, practical tips, and creative ideas to every conversation. When she's not speaking or strategizing, you will find her behind a camera or planning her next travel adventure.
Lorraine, welcome to Revenue Rehab. Your session begins now. Thank you so much for the invitation. I'm really looking forward to the conversation.
Yes, I am excited. And before we dive in, I'm an avid traveler as well. So I have to ask, what's been your favorite destination so far? So I always tell people that wherever I am is my favorite destination, but we just recently got back from a trip to Spain and Portugal and loved that.
We went down the coast, we rode bicycles, and I'm going to tell you the big cities are great, but the big cities are crowded. And if you can get away from the cities and get to some of the smaller villages and historical cities along the coast of Spain, my favorite was Obados. It is a medieval village. There's a little castle.
There's all of three streets, fabulous restaurants, beautiful views, and a 500-year-old guest house. It was fabulous. Ooh, sounds amazing. I'm going to have to add that to my list.
And I know I could sit and talk travel all day, but let's start from the beginning of your story. So tell me, what challenge were you facing and how did you know you had a problem? So when I was interviewing for the job of VP of Creative Services, the executive VP alluded to the fact that they were having some turnover issues. And I was like, well, that's okay.
You know, I've worked with teams before. I've turned that around. she did not tell me that every week every single week somebody quit there were 48 people in the department and for a year and a half one person a week at least was quitting wow yeah like that that is one of those like i've dealt with high turnover before but wow yes yes so you know i came in on the first week and i'm you know chatting with people and i'm talking to my right-hand guy. And David was fabulous.
And if there's one key learning, you got to have somebody in your number two spot who will be honest with you, who will call you on the account. And, you know, when we started making progress and we'd get to like Wednesday or Thursday, and I'm jumping ahead, but I'll come back. But when we got to like Wednesday or Thursday, I was like, hey, nobody's quit yet. He's like, it ain't Friday.
So, you know, you got to have somebody who like, yeah, Lorraine, it ain't all sunshine and roses. You ain't fixed this yet. So I knew pretty much on day one that I had a problem. And it was a little overwhelming because I had signed up to fix it, but I hadn't realized just how big it was.
And the thing about turnover and the reason I wanted to talk about it with you on Revenue Rehab is turnover is expensive. It is expensive because every time you have to look for somebody new, you're taking your people away from productivity and putting them back at the interview table. And every time we were paying recruiters at probably 10 grand a pop to fill some of these jobs. So we were out a lot of recruiting money and we just in general had this horrible lack of productivity.
And so the, I mean, so for me, the first thing is, why are they leaving? What? I mean, that was, that was, and you know, you would think that that was the really hard question. It really wasn't.
We had a culture where people were interchangeable, where management looked at each of the people in my department as if they were a peg, that they could just move around the board. I was running a team of creatives. They're not the same. You know, I don't want to insult my peers in accounting, but accounting is accounting is accounting.
There's a right answer. There's a wrong answer. That's not the way it works in graphic design. That not the way it works in writing You have different skills and you got to recognize and acknowledge that So the first thing was before I did anything else I had to get to know my people and figure out what they were good at Because that was when I started talking to them that was the thing that kept coming up over and over again.
They just moved me onto this team. This doesn't make any sense. I'm not good at this. I was good at that.
They should have left me where I was. Well, but they had three people there and they only had one person here. so they had to move somebody. Yeah, but not me because I'm not going to stay because this is not what I signed up for.
So number one, figuring out what was really underneath it. And because we were paying good money. We were paying incentives. If you brought one of your friends to work for us, we bonused you if they stayed three months.
I mean, we were throwing money at the problem, But the problem wasn't money. And so it sounds like that this was a leadership challenge. And so did you, was this a situation where your predecessor created this environment or was it more structural in the organization where that kind of motion was just the norm? It was actually structural throughout the organization.
And so the first thing I had to do was figure that out. And then the second thing I had to do was wrap my people in a bubble. I had to put up walls that sealed my people off from, not so they couldn't do their job, but I had to literally go into battle and get in between my team and the senior VPs and my team and the other department managers and be that interface because that energy, those expectations, all of that was weighing us down so much. And it was really spiraling out of control.
So creating buffers, finding the people on my team who had a little thicker skin, who had a little more flexibility. And the only way to do this was to spend time with my people. I had 48 people on my I got an org chart with everybody's names on it. And then I walked around the floor and would look at name tags and go, you're Derek.
Okay, you're Derek. They told me that there were executives that they'd been there a year, year and a half who had never learned their names, that were giving them projects that they were working on, that these people had never bothered to learn their names. I was so impressed that I was making an effort. To me, this was common sense.
So the first thing, figuring it out, and then really diving into, okay, let's start getting people in the right departments. What else can we do to make things more pleasant? Well, one of the things that we had was a very rigid structure. Everybody had to be at work from eight to five.
Got an hour for lunch. Again, that works for accountants. It works for people in the IT department. it.
You can't tell a graphic designer that they have to be creative at 8.01. Sometimes they're not. And so I sat down, you know, team by team and I said, I'm not making any promises, but if you could set your working hours, if you could come in when you wanted, if you could leave when you wanted, you got to work the eight hour, you know, hour for lunch.
We got to do that. but tell me, tell me what your hours are. Tell me what works for you. And what I found was I had a couple of people who had husbands who had early jobs or wives who had early jobs or had daycare issues.
I had people who wanted to be at work at seven in the morning. I had my young, my young writers who liked to party a little bit and really didn't want to stroll in until 10. And so I went to my boss and I said, look, I got an idea. I'm going to add four hours a day to my team's capability.
And it's not going to cost you a dime. I'm going to have writers and designers available at seven in the morning and at seven o'clock at night. Cause let's face it, the execs don't get around to reviewing stuff and needing stuff and we're paying overtime and we're making people stay late when they don't want to stay late. And we're making them come in early and make arrangements for their kids.
What if I could just plan this and it doesn't cost you any more money? And my boss went, well, number one, that's impossible. And I said, no, it's actually not. And number two, if you don't mind, I'm going to do this.
And she was like, okay, give it a shot. And so now the second sticking point that I'm disposable, I'm in the wrong job, nobody respects what I do, and I got to be here at the wrong time, all of that vanished. And so we started getting a little bit of, a little life came back into the department. People started enjoying what they were doing again.
There was a little more energy and it didn't solve all the problems at once, but we noticed that at around, it took 12 weeks, so three months. Every Friday morning, I'd walk into David's office if it hadn't happened yet and go, it's Friday. And he's not, it ain't 5 PM. And finally, there was that Friday where I walked into his office and I'm like, hey, I'm going home.
And I expect everybody's going to be here Monday morning. And he's like, I think you're right. And once we got over that hump, we held that department for 18 months. We didn't have a single person leave.
So now, now we could actually start working because now we could get creative. We could do some interesting things because suddenly I didn't have a team of rookies. I wasn't spending a third of my day and all my senior team leaders were not spending X number of hours every week interviewing people. They were spending the time mentoring their younger employees, the new employees.
And they were learning and they were getting better at their jobs. And you know what happens when you get better at your job? You get faster. And all of a sudden we realized we might have too many people because we had never in all that time because we were always filling positions we had never had full capacity I mean we had never been fully loaded Well once we were fully loaded fully trained people who been doing their jobs people who had time to educate, we started looking at some other functions and pulling people and saying, hey, we have an opportunity to do this.
Would you be interested? Not, we're going to move you to this, but this opportunity is available. If you don't want it, somebody else will. And now people could see that there was opportunity.
Again, we were already paying them. We were paying them well. The working conditions physically were very nice. Now they had flexible schedule and they could start looking at interesting assignments.
But I wasn't done. Before you keep going, I want to back up because you've hit on a lot of key points that I want to dig into. One of the things that is really key here is it's clear that you had the chutzpah to battle. Because, you know, when you think about when you're going against peers, seniors and trying to go against the grain, that can feel like a battle.
And that is something that I see. I have seen multiple leaders, not in the exact same situation with turnover, but in a situation where they saw the problem, that the real issue was more structural within the organization. But they've taken the perspective to say, I'm not willing to fight this battle. And they will try to have, you know, figure out workarounds or do what they can within their own bubble.
And so I'd love to hear you talk more about how you approached that piece of it, because it sounds like this is one of those things that it was very much a little bit of ask for permission, but a lot of more of the ask for forgiveness and not permission. So talk to me a bit more about that, because that is something that I see a lot of leaders struggle with. So I was very fortunate. Very early in my career, I worked for a company that did a psych profile.
And they let me read the profile. And it said, she's very smart. She's going to get things done, but she's going to do it her own way. And I was like, excuse me, did they read this?
Did they know what they were hiring when they read? And he said yes. And so from very early in my career, I had a little bit of permission to be on the edge. And so every job I interviewed for, I was very clear.
If you're looking for somebody, and this is hard when you're looking for a job and you're willing to say anything to get that job. If you want to be happy in that job, you need to draw a clear line. Everybody teaches you how to negotiate for salary. Nobody teaches you how to negotiate for your working conditions.
And that was something I always did. I always went into the conversation saying, look, I'm not going to do it the way everybody else does. If you want someone who does it the way everybody else does, there are three people behind me that are looking for this job. If you want to fix the problem, if you want to move ahead, if you're looking for innovative solutions and you're okay being uncomfortable, then I'm your girl.
And so by the time I got this job, I was comfortable with that. Now, I pushed the edge and got my hand slapped more than a few times in this job, but I also got really good results. And so my boss went, the more I succeeded, the more she'd go to bat for me. And that's the other thing is that if you see a really big problem, that's not the one you tackle first.
It's not. Because if you fail, you got no place to go. Pick a smaller one. Get that win.
Build your network. That was really hard for me. I had gone from a company where I'd been there for eight years, and I had a ton of relationships throughout the whole company. So I had a lot of resources to draw on when I had a crazy idea.
Moving to a company where I didn't have those allies, I had to take a little time to build them. But I think negotiate for your working conditions. Make sure people know who you are and the good side of why they should bring you to the table, even if you're crazy. I love it.
And the other point that I wanted to dig into is I think you hit on a really key thing that I want to make sure people caught because it's not always obvious. When you are dealing with people problems and where your team is not functioning at its best, you are essentially overspending on human capital. And, you know, a common theme now, everybody's talking about how we're having to do more with less. You know, I think do more with less comes up as often as AI does in conversation.
And this is one place where I don't think people always recognize that when you're trying to do more with less, that efficiency and having a high performing team, having people working the way that is best for them, because I'm one of those, I don't start my day till 10 p.m. or 10 a.m.
people because I'm not a morning person. So working when they're most efficient, working on things that they are passionate about, having the flexibility to structure their work in a way that makes sense. You get everybody hitting at that higher level that you talked about to the point where you're like, oh, we've got extra capacity. Technically, our team is too big.
Where my guess is when you had the someone leaving every week, it felt like you didn't have enough people, couldn't get enough work done. Is that a statement? That's absolutely true. Absolutely true.
You know, it doesn't take a lot to make that shift, to go from we're absolutely swamped to, man, everything's getting done. And a lot of times it's just having people in place long enough to figure that out. And so you talked a bit about the outcomes but I want to just really allow you to talk about the measurable impact So you went through you solved it you got to that point where you could go home on a Friday and expect everybody to still be there on Monday But thinking about the organization as a whole, what was the measurable impact of you solving this?
Well, the first measurable impact is we were probably spending about $10,000 a month on recruiting fees. So right off the bat, we were saving $100,000. So that's pretty measurable. The second thing was, oh, this is a whole story in and of itself, but I'll give you the short version.
When we were in the insurance business, and in the insurance business, you don't have a tangible product. You have a brochure. So if you don't have a brochure, you can't make a sale. When I was in a situation with a department with 100% turnover, our out of stock was out of control.
We were 300 items on any given day. And the shipping department told me if I could get that to 100, I would be a hero. Well, once I solved the issue of the team, now we could take on that challenge. And again, that whole process, everything we did, everything we brainstormed, all the little changes we made in our process, we got to 100 back orders.
I gave the team a deadline of September 1, and we got to 100 back orders by about August 20th. We actually got to zero back orders one day in December because we got that far ahead. So the financial impact for that is harder to qualify. But if I'm not out of literature, I have the ability to make sales.
And so that was the second thing. And then the third thing was a little bit of revenue and a lot of employee satisfaction. We had too many people. We could have laid somebody off, or we could go looking for other work.
And we started doing graphic design work for the Indianapolis Motor Speedway, the Indianapolis Zoo. We did some work for the IndyStar. So my designers, who were very talented, and my writers, who were very talented and committed to what they were doing were also a little burned out on insurance. So if I could give them a product with cute animals or racing cars, and they could tap into a different part of their creativity and a different part of their brain, and we could get paid for the work, it's not a bad deal.
So I think those are the three kind of big impacts of resolving the people issue. As I say, well, that is so amazing and so impressive. One of the best parts of learning from others is understanding what really made the difference. So before we wrap up, let's let our listeners walk away with a little insights they can use right away.
Because I do think you've given a good blueprint in how to approach these things. So I'll ask if you had it to do all over again, what's one thing you'd do differently? Maybe ask more questions in the interview. I've been there for sure.
Yeah. No, I think maybe just kind of, I kind of knew what I wanted to do. I think I had a really good team of senior team leaders. I didn't know it at the time.
And I think the one thing that would have made it better, smoother, faster is if I had sat down more with them in the beginning, rather than taking this, I'm going to fix this because that's my style. I think if I had engaged them a little bit more, we might have moved through it faster. I don't think we would have done anything any differently. But I think we would have cleared some of the pain points maybe a little faster.
David had been around the company for quite a while. He knew where all the bodies were buried. And I should have maybe spent a little more time looking at some of that before I went forward. Okay.
And that is a really good lesson for all of us. I think we especially get caught in that trap when we're coming into a new role. You know, you have to make your mark and, you know, be amazing and all of the things. And there generally are people who can be of value and usually are willing to as well.
Yeah. Well, Lorraine, every good session ends with a plan for progress. progress because, of course, talking about success won't make it repeatable. Before we go, tell our audience how they can connect with you.
So the best way to find me is either A, I'm on LinkedIn. If you look for Lorraine Ball, I'm going to pop up. You can find my podcast, More Than A Few Words, wherever you listen to podcasts. And I'm doing a little experiment right now, so I'm not even sure you'll be able to find me there, but I'm experimenting with SubStack.
I just, I'm intrigued and I'm enough of a geek that I want to find out, but LinkedIn is probably the best place to go. Awesome. Well, we will make sure to link to your LinkedIn as well as your podcast. So check the show notes wherever you are listening or watching this podcast so that you can connect with Lorraine.
Lorraine, again, thank you so, so much for joining me. I have truly enjoyed this discussion. It's fun for me too. Thanks for having me.
You are welcome and thanks everyone for tuning in. I hope you have enjoyed my conversation with Lorraine. I can't believe we're at the end. See you next time.
Bye-bye. You've been listening to Revenue Rehab with your host, Brandi Starr. Your session is now over, but the learning has just begun. Join our mailing list and catch up on all our shows at revenuerehab.
live. We're also on Twitter and Instagram at revenuerehab. This concludes this week's session. We'll see you next week.
Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.