Leveraging Thought Leadership · 2026-07-30 · 27 min
Key moments - from our scoring
Substance score
43 / 100
Five dimensions, 20 points each
Dr. Benjamin Granger combines his role as Chief Workplace Psychologist at Qualtrics with authorship of "A Leader Worth Following," a data-backed leadership guide grounded in evolutionary psychology, industrial-organizational psychology, and insights from billions of data points Qualtrics collects annually. The conversation explores how Granger distills patterns from massive datasets into actionable leadership frameworks, the concept of "evolutionary hangovers" (cognitive biases rooted in our tribal past that misfire in modern organizations), and the real work of thought leadership promotion beyond manuscript completion. Granger discusses the tension between authentic self-promotion and message evangelism, the critical gap between academic research and real-world application (using examples like goal-setting science and NPS survey gaming), and how organizational alignment enabled Qualtrics to support his book while he conducted research on his own time. Peter Winick probes how theoretical frameworks from scholars like Locke and Latham fail when deployed in complex organizations, and highlights how Granger bridges the scientist-practitioner gap by testing ideas in the field. The episode reveals the flywheel effect when thought leaders align personal mission with corporate mission, the importance of communication in leadership, and why intuitive leadership practices often contradict what data shows actually works.
Benjamin Granger analyzes billions of data points Qualtrics collects annually about how consumers feel about brands and employees feel about employers, then distills actionable insights he shares with business leaders, employees, and organizations to improve their experiences.
An evolutionary hangover is a cognitive bias - like judging someone as abrasive based on a single interaction - that evolved to protect us in tribal settings but now causes problems in modern organizations where context and intent are often misunderstood.
When employee compensation is tied to survey scores (like a car salesman's pay linked to customer satisfaction ratings), employees will coach respondents to game the system, destroying the data's integrity and defeating the measurement's original purpose of identifying improvement areas.
Goal-setting science is well-established with over 1,000 academic articles, but fails in complex real organizations not because the science is wrong, but because the underlying assumptions - clear metrics, transparent incentives, aligned compensation - are violated in messy practice.
Qualtrics aligned the book with company mission (improving human experience), saw it showcased their deep research on par with academic work, and benefited from the halo effect as Granger's thought leadership success elevated the brand while he conducted research on his own time.
Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.
The episode contains a handful of genuinely interesting ideas - the evolutionary basis of communication gaps, the research-to-practice failure in goal-setting, and survey-gaming corrupting data - but much of the runtime is consumed by the guest's book-writing journey and self-promotion dynamics rather than substantive workplace psychology insights. The insights per minute ratio is low for a 27-minute episode.
goal setting as a science has over a thousand articles that have been written on it in academia, Locke and Latham back in the 90s... you drop it into a messy, complex, large organization and surprise, surprise, it doesn't work exactly the way the research suggests
we learned to talk yesterday and we learned to write an hour ago because we've been communicating non verbally for millions and millions of years
The 'evolutionary hangover' framing is explicitly acknowledged as a relabeling of cognitive bias, and most of the conceptual territory - evolutionary psychology applied to organizations, survey gaming, end-of-day reflection - is well-trodden. Borrowed authority (Marshall Goldsmith, Arianna Huffington, Cardinal Newman) does the heavy lifting rather than first-principles reasoning.
evolutionary hangover is just my word for cognitive bias
our brains weren't designed for 21st century living. They still think they're on the savannah
Dr. Granger is a legitimate senior practitioner - a decade-plus at Qualtrics with a real industrial-org psychology doctorate and genuine access to billions of data points - but the transcript never meaningfully exploits that unique data access; conversation stays at anecdote and general principle level rather than drawing on proprietary research.
we collect literally billions of data points every year from how consumers feel about brands, for how employees feel about their employers
I'm a practitioner. I'm a scientist practitioner. So I take a lot of that, I bring it into the field, I test it in the field
There are some credible anchors - Locke and Latham, 1,000+ goal-setting articles, the 100 - 200K year speech-development estimate, the named collaborator Dr. Shauna Waters - but the dominant mode is illustrative anecdote (car dealership NPS, friend on a plane) rather than cited data or organisational metrics.
goal setting as a science has over a thousand articles that have been written on it in academia, Locke and Latham back in the 90s
the development of human speech developed about 100 to 200,000 years ago
The host frequently answers his own questions with extended monologues and rarely challenges the guest's claims; 'Stay there a minute' is used as a pivot to the host's own views rather than a genuine probe. There is no productive disagreement and several PR-friendly exchanges about the book's success and Qualtrics' endorsement go completely unchallenged.
Stay there a minute. Right? So in your job at Qualtrics, which is just an amazing company, you're not client fate, right?
What would be the. What would be different?
Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.
Why do we size up a rude stranger in seconds and decide they don't belong in our "tribe"? Dr. Benjamin Granger has a term for it: the evolutionary hangover - his phrase for the cognitive biases our brains evolved for savanna survival and never quite retired. As Chief Workplace Psychologist at Qualtrics , Granger spends his days distilling billions of data points on how employees and customers really feel, and in this episode he brings that same lens to his new USA Today bestseller, A Leader Worth Following . The conversation moves from the biological to the deeply practical. Granger traces human speech back only 100,000 - 200,000 years - a blink in evolutionary time - to explain why we still assume our texts and emails land exactly as intended, and why they so often don't. He and host Peter Winick dig into a favorite (and least favorite) example: the customer satisfaction survey. Whether it's a car dealership coaching you to "circle the five" or a flight attendant joking about the inevitable post-flight survey, Granger shows how well-established science like goal-setting theory gets bent out of shape the moment it collides with real incentive structures.
Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.
Speaker A: Foreign. Welcome, welcome. This is Peter Winick. I'm the founder and CEO at Thought Leadership Leverage, and you're joining us on this LinkedIn Live version of our podcast, which is Leveraging Thought, uh, Leadership Today. My guest is Dr. Ben Granger. He's a chief workplace psychologist at Qualtrics. Many of you know Qualtrics. You probably use them whether you know it or not. He has over 15 years experience building, running and optimizing experience management programs across hundreds of global organizations. His research has been published in academic and business media, including cnbc, Forbes, Wall Street Journal, and he's earned a doctorate in industrial psychology from University of South Florida. And he is now an author of A Leader Worth following, which is now a, uh, USA Today bestseller as of, I guess, midnight this morning or whatever for coming on.
Speaker B: Thanks, Peter. Yes, pleasure to be here.
Speaker A: So I want to talk about your, uh, sort of journey, if you will. Right. So you've got a really cool job at a really cool company. So I'm familiar with Qualtrics for a long time. But tell us what your job like, if you were writing the job description of your job. Because everybody knows what a organizational, uh, psychologist does at a, at a tech, surveying tech company. But what is, what is the day job really?
Speaker B: What I do is I take a lot of the data that we collect. As you can imagine, those are familiar with quatrics. We collect literally billions of data points every year from how consumers feel about brands, for how employees feel about their employers. What's going well, what's not going well. And so my job is really to look at a lot of that data and to distill actionable insights from it and share that with business leaders, with business professionals, customer facing employees, just anybody in an organization on what are some of the things they can do to improve the experience of.
Speaker A: You're spotting patterns and you're seeing things that happen in the aggregate. Right. Because everybody's using Qualtrics to measure their stuff. But you get to see the big kahuna without, you know, and, um, violating any privacies there. Exactly. Patterns by industry or geography or trends and all that. And in, in reading your book, I see lots of, you know, there are lots of things that stuck out to me I want you to define, because it's the first time I heard the term defined the way you did as the evolutionary hangover. Well, I read that, I'm like, what the heck? And then I was like, that makes sense. So tell us what that is. That was one thing that stuck out for me. Reading the book.
Speaker B: Yeah. So evolutionary hangover is just my word for cognitive bias. And so I got really fascinated. Obviously, I'm an organizational psychologist, Peter. As you know, I'm fascinated by the field of evolutionary psychology. And so one of the things that I normally do just in my own day to day work is I try to think more deeply about some of the normal, mundane stuff that we do. Like, for example, what's a company? What is an organization? And the way I kind of define it is, hey, an organization today is a group of people working together, using shared resources to accomplish a shared mission. Okay. Humans have always done that. We just do that today in what we call companies and organizations. But I think we, we glean a lot if we go way back in time to look at how did the human brain evolve, why did it evolve the way it does? And a lot of it has to do with us being a social species. So evolutionary hangovers have to do with, well, why do we engage in all this automatic judgment of people? You know, if we run into a mean person in the street and we, and they, and they, they say something rude to us or we're dealing with a customer and they lash out at us and we say, man, what an abrasive person or what a rude person. Well, that's a cognitive bias and what I call an evolutionary hangover. Essentially, it's something that developed over evolutionary time for a very good reason. But in modern business settings and modern social settings, it can sometimes cause problems. Just like last night. Today, not so much.
Speaker A: Right. So we're tribal. If I had a jerk detector on, and really quickly, I can go, oh, man, that person's a, you know, abrasive or a jerk. I'm probably doing that biologically to go, I don't want that person to be in my tribe because they're not going to be fun. They're not, you know, they could put my, right, my, uh, life at risk, or they're not going to be good hunters, whatever. And that kind of made sense at that time. But I think the evolution of technology and the way we do things, whatever, the brains are always going to be a couple hundred years behind.
Speaker B: Exactly, exactly. The author, Hillary Scarlet, puts it really nicely. You know, our brains weren't designed for 21st century living. They still think they're on the savannah.
Speaker A: Yeah, exactly, exactly. So you've got this job. It's a really cool job at a really cool company, right? And then you sit around and you go, you know what? Um, I don't have enough to do. I Think I'll take on another project. I'll write a book. Right. That's how this happened. I have so much time to fill. Is that we're happy that it's coming.
Speaker B: Not exactly. Oh, yeah.
Speaker A: But, um.
Speaker B: But what basically happened was I was. I'd been work. I've been working for qualtrics for over 10 years, and I've had a bunch of different jobs, and I was doing some work with our pr, with our PR team, with the media. And our PR team said, hey, you know, you're. You're doing a good job with the media. We need to elevate your title so we can open some more doors.
Speaker A: Okay.
Speaker B: So, uh, they gave me this great job title, Chief workplace Psychologist. And I said, yeah, sign me up for that. But the problem, Peter, was I'm surrounded by amazing behavioral scientists and psychologists. So I'm sitting over here thinking, do I deserve this? Like, you know, do I belong in this. This job title? So I just said, I gotta earn this. And so I just started tearing through books and academic papers in my area. Leadership, all these other areas. Cognitive psychology, evolutionary psychology, physics, as you've seen.
Speaker A: Yeah.
Speaker B: Different, uh, subfields, uh, of physics. And then I started writing notes. And so I had this. I had like, hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of notes on my iPhone. Because when I read, write.
Speaker A: Yeah.
Speaker B: One day I'm sitting in church. I'm a religious person sitting in church one day, and I get this little nudge, hey, maybe I should put this all together into a book. Not two or three days later, I got hit up by a major publisher who said, hey, we just read something that you wrote. You know, um, you work. Would you like to work together on a book? I was like, well, just so happens I just decided to write one. So here we are.
Speaker A: Stay there a minute. So I want to go back in time to. All right, I think this is a good idea to write a book. Right? So this is, I'm guessing a year or two ago, something like that.
Speaker B: About two years ago.
Speaker A: Two years ago. So you say, all right, I'm going to write the book. And now here we are on the other side of that. What were your expectations as. Or, say, young Ben, But. But pre author Ben versus the reality. And I'm. And, um, I'm having you eat a little bit of your own dog food that's in the book.
Speaker B: Yes. Thank you, Dr. Naive Dr. Ben. Um, let's talk about naive Dr. Ben. I love reading. I love writing. I was having a blast. I was like, oh, this is fun. I Can't wait to start my next one. And I have a couple in the works, by the way.
Speaker A: Right.
Speaker B: And at the time, we were kind of joking about this beforehand. A lot of the publishers were, that I was talking to around the time were saying, hey, you know, the real work starts once you're done with your manuscript. I'm like, yeah, I mean, I do keynote talks all the time. I do workshops. This will be great. Yeah, sounds awesome. Let's do it. That's not work for me. I like that part. Oh, my God. That, uh, I underestimated the amount of work involved in, um, marketing and promoting. And I should also add, you know, self promotion is not natural for me. I don't like that it feels.
Speaker A: Stay there a minute. Right? So in your job at Qualtrics, which is just an amazing company, you're not client fate, right? You're not out there on the business development side. You're not there attracting clients in your role. There's always plenty for you to do. You're not, you don't have to create demand of, oh, uh, there's not enough data today for me to sift through. Right.
Speaker B: In my current job, that's true. But I have been on demand generation. I've been on revenue generating teams. So I've done a lot of that work. But in my current job, that's true.
Speaker A: Right. But even when in those roles, you're not promoting, Ben, you're creating, promoting the suite of offerings and services and solutions that fall under the brand. So, you know, a lot of folks tell me that it's. It doesn't feel natural, it doesn't come natural. It's not what I do. But how are you coming to terms with that? Right? Because part of what you need to do, right, is if you've got to believe in this more than anyone else, so I know that you do, then you got to take on the role of, geez, I gotta, I gotta be banging the drum on this thing.
Speaker B: Right? The way I justify to myself is the message is what needs to get out there.
Speaker A: Right?
Speaker B: And I have heard competing arguments here, and I'm actually very curious what you think about this, Peter, because you know, you, you know this area better than me of. I don't see it so much as it's me that I'm selling. What I'm selling is the message which I really believe in. And I get that feedback a lot.
Speaker A: Stay there for a minute because I think that's really important. I think that people are smart and there are people that promote themselves Right. And everything that they do, whatever that is. Right. Like, you're always. There's always a price tag at the end of the thing. One week, it's a, uh, program or a book or the. Whatever. Um, and that's fine and dandy if that's who you are and what you want to be and all that sort of stuff. Right. I think you're right that you are really the messenger, the evangelist. Call it what you will for the ideas. And these ideas will. Could live longer than you. Right. Like, I can imagine a time in whatever fifty, a hundred years from now when you're not here anymore, when people are still looking at this book going, those are pretty cool ideas. Right. And I think that's a great mindset to say part of the reason I'm m on the planet is to unleash the power of the ideas, not for ego satisfaction. Because anybody that reads this book will be smarter, a smarter leader, a better leader, a happier leader, or more grounded.
Speaker B: Yeah. That's such a good way to put it. Totally agree. And I like the way, you know, one idea about ideas that has really stuck with me comes from the great John Henry Cardinal Newman. And what he used to say is, ideas are infinite and the ideas unfold over time in the play of lively minds. I just see myself in that unfolding. I'm helping to unfold these ideas. Not only would these ideas live past me, but they've lived before me. Right.
Speaker A: And.
Speaker B: And they'll continue to live on. And I feel like my job is to help catalyze the unfolding of that and to cat and to get people talking about it, to engage in this conversation.
Speaker A: Yep. So what other surprises, what other things surprised you along the journey? And I know you're early in the book marketing journey, although you're in. In the depths of it now. What are the things that quote, you know, young Ben of two years ago, uh, naive, bad, not know.
Speaker B: Well, this is a. This is kind of a meta point. And a key point that I address in the book itself is about communication. So the whole book is an effort in communication. Right. I'm having a conversation with people through the book.
Speaker A: Yeah.
Speaker B: But one of the most fascinating things I found in probably the biggest surprise, actually, was when I was going down into the development of human language. M. And so, like I mentioned, I allowed my reading to take me wherever it needed to go. So if I was reading a book or a piece and I was like, oh, that's interesting, I just. I just allowed myself to go because I wasn't planning on writing the book, right? So I just was studying and when I eventually got to how long ago did humans learn to talk?
Speaker A: Right?
Speaker B: Because what a lot of anthropologists agree. This is disputed, but what most anthropologists agree is that the development of human speech developed about 100 to 200,000 years ago. Now I think to the average person, that sounds like a long time, but in the, in the evolutionary history, right? If we really zoom out and we look at how long ago have has mankind been around, it's almost like we learned to talk yesterday and we learned to write an hour ago because we've been communicating non verbally for millions and millions of years. So this got me thinking, okay? Now we're living in this world where everybody texts each other, we're all on anonymous social media post to each other, we're sending emails to thousands and thousands of people. And we assume that the meaning behind the words that we string together are interpreted exactly the way that we intend.
Speaker A: A great idea is only the beginning. In the Thought Leadership Handbook, Bill Sherman, Naran, Ariel and I share what it takes to shape, package and scale your expertise in a crowded market. It's available now. Learn more@thoughtleadership handbook.com and order it today at Amazon, BNN Bookshop, or Amplify. Well, but we all know that's not true, right? We've all gotten that email from a friend or a colleague or a loved one. And you read it three times. And it could be, depending on your mood, you're feeling sensitive that day or cranky that day. You're never enough coughing, go, oh my God, why are they attacking me? Or why are they sarcastic or what? You know, like there's, there's a bold font.
Speaker B: Right?
Speaker A: Right. Sarcastic font. Right. Like so. And sometimes that leads to negative stuff where you got to pick up the phone and say, did you? I took that to mean this. Is that what you intended? Like, oh, no, no, no, no, I left off a letter or I, you know, I was. Because, because we don't think about the other. We're thinking about they were rushing off to get that text to you or that email, whether Starbucks or something, and they didn't sit there and contemplate it for 20 minutes like you just did on the receiving.
Speaker B: Exactly. And but here's my big challenge. I think we all do know this, but how often do we operate as if that's true?
Speaker A: Right?
Speaker B: That's a different question. And I think we often don't operate as if that's true, especially when we're the one Delivering the message.
Speaker A: So let me ask you this. So you've got a pretty demanding job at a pretty high growth organization and that they sort of blessed the project. Right? You could have just done this all on your own. But they said, you know what, Ben, this would be a good thing. It's good for you, it's good for us, it's good for our customers, it's good for our employees. What do you think? Why do you think they justified that? This is a great use of some percentage of your time over the last couple years and in, in moving forward now in promotion and speaking and all that. What's the benefit to the, to, to Qualtric?
Speaker B: I think the first thing I would say is the, the book, the studying in the book, I, I did on my own time. So that was, that was, I made that very clear and we were very clear on that together. But then I went through a lot, I did a lot of work to pitch it to the company to say, hey, Qualtrics, look, I've been working on this for a while. Um, looks like I got a book deal here. Do y' all want a partner on it? And one of the things I did and I did, this wasn't a mechanism to sell it to Qualtrics. I just did it because, you know, we sit on a ton of data and insights. I weaved a lot of what we've learned into all the academic studies I did. So it's intertwined. And so I said, look, I think what this is going to do is it's going to show off how deep our research is and put it on the same plane as all this other academic research that a lot of people are very familiar with that's mutually beneficial. And so that resonated. And so, and also the, the mission and vision I had for the book, which is to improve the human experience, is identical to the mission and vision of our company. So there was. There was.
Speaker A: Right. Stay there a minute because I, I think a lot of authors and thought leaders struggle with this issue. And the, and, and, and the reality is there's alignment right now. Alignment might last for a month or 10 years or forever, but as long as there's alignment around, benefit and around, why and around. And, and I love how you brought it back to sort of mission vision values. It's probably not a coincidence that your personal mission vision values line up to qual. And you've been there a long time. Right. So there's a self selection piece there. Right. And the more successful this book is and the More successful you are. There's a halo effect to Qualtrics and as battle, you know, so there's a flywheel effect there. Good for Ben, good for Qualtrics, good for our employees, good for our customers, whatever. And I think it's, uh, you know, it's really. It's really a cool thing for a brand, if you will, to go. We have X number of published authors because we expect that of academia. Right. Like, you're not going to, like, you could have been an academic if you wanted to write. Academia is the KPI, if you will, is publish.
Speaker B: Publish or parish.
Speaker A: Right. And. And the fact is, Sorry, uh, my academic friends, nobody reads most academic journals. There's five people that read the article. You spent years. What I love about what you did is it. Is it hits an academic standard in terms of the quality research, whatever, but it reads like a real book, right? So therefore you're unleashing the power of the, the ideas, not by dumbing them down to the silly level, but making them approachable and relatable and whatever. And there are a couple pieces in there. I'm like, wow, there had to be a ton of data under that to get to that point. Like this. This isn't. I don't believe this just because, well, Ben said, right. Like, that's. That's a piece. So, uh, interesting.
Speaker B: It's right on. And I would also add to my academic friends there is. The work that they do is essential, is critical, and we need both. We need the evangelists who can take those insights, distill them, tell the story about it to the, the general population. And we need the people who go really deep and get very technical, because that's where those insights come from. They are testing it, they're beating it up, and they're saying, okay, this. And then I'm one of. I'm a practitioner. I'm a scientist practitioner. So I take a lot of that, I bring it into the field, I test it in the field, and then I say, okay, that passes the eye test. Let's put it, uh, let's go out there and get it. You know, and that overlap of the
Speaker A: theoretical to the applied. The academics typically don't get the advantage. Like, they could model out and prove their ideas from a research perspective. But you work in the real world, right? Yeah. And oftentimes the real world, you know, what is it, the Mike Tyson quote? Everyone has a plan till they get punched in the face. PhD, until they get punched in the face. Right. But you're dealing with that on A day to day in the reality of the customers and such using Qualtrics.
Speaker B: Here's a really good example of exactly what you're saying, Peter. I'm working right now with a good friend of mine and colleague, Dr. Shauna Waters. And she herself, uh, is a phenomenal thought leader and publisher and author. And one of the topics we're working on is the problem of goal setting in organizations. Now, goal setting as a science has over a thousand articles that have been written on it in academia, Locke and Latham back in the 90s. I mean it's one of the most well established practices of motivation. And yet you take that practice that's so well published on, um, and established and you drop it into a messy, complex, large organization and surprise, surprise, it doesn't work exactly the way the research suggests. So we're, we're talking about why is that the case. And it's not a problem of the science, it's a problem of assumptions that we make when we apply the research in the real world.
Speaker A: An example in the book, and it's funny, when I was reading that, I've had the exact same experience where you go to buy a car. The car's amazing, you know, the experience is great, the sales guy's great, the price, like, you're like, wow, this was awesome. And then I've had this several times with real part gums. And then at the end the sales Larry Gal sits down with and you're going to get this survey and blah blah, blah, blah blah. And they, and they're going to tell you to answer it. I'm like, wait, time on time out here, Timeout. Like, I know the head person at BMW didn't say this was a good idea. I know the people at Net Promoter Score whatever tech they're using for that didn't train that person in how to do it. So why did that person do that? Well, why he did that is because x percent of his comp per vehicle comes from getting these scores. So if you're going to say to me this is going to hit me in the pocketbook, you don't have to train me. I'm going to sit down and look eye to eye and say, hey Ben, you know, I hope you love everything, but you know, it's really not good for me or my career or whatever. Unless you circle the number five. Let's practice circling.
Speaker B: Then I'm five.
Speaker A: And you just bastardize the entire data and, and you just wasted zillions of dollars. Right? Like, but it, we've all seen this every day. And I love that you, you know, you call that out because if you make the wrong thing right, you. They weren't. The intent of the measurement was to. Where can we get better? Not. How do we feel? The sales guy.
Speaker B: Exactly, Exactly. It's one of my favorite. It's one of my favorite and least favorite examples. In fact, I had a friend of mine who I, uh, gave the book. I gave an early copy of the book to. He was reading that chapter. I think it was chapter four, if I'm not mistaken. On the plane. His plane landed. He just finished that little section in the book. And then what happened when they landed, the flight attendant said, oh, you're gonna get a survey. And he said. He just busted out laughing.
Speaker A: And the flight attendant's not holding you hostage until you get off the plane.
Speaker B: Until you. Unless you give us fives, you know. Yeah.
Speaker A: At least they didn't do that in the air and say, if you don't give us five. I don't know. The pilot might not be in a good mood today. It might be a rocky land. Yeah.
Speaker B: Maybe we're not going to lax. Kind of depends on the radio here, right?
Speaker A: You rate us a two, you land in Cleveland, Right. Like, sorry, Cleveland. Um, what. So what's next now? So the book's done, the book's out, you're trying to promote it, etc. What are the things that you. You hope. If we were to say, let's schedule a time a year from now and talk. What are you hoping is different in the. Maybe the business lexicon in your world and the Qualtrics world?
Speaker B: What.
Speaker A: What would be the. What would be different?
Speaker B: Yeah, I hope that. I hope that we get more comfortable with having hard conversations with ourselves. I know that sounds a little fluffy and light. I. But I don't think it is. I really want to see. I want to see a bit of an internal revolution and say more about that.
Speaker A: What does that mean, conversations with yourself? Because, you know, I'm in New York. I walk down the streets and see a lot of people having conversations out loud.
Speaker B: Deep, intentional introspection. So, you know, introspection. Is that. That term I think we're all somewhat familiar with? It's a. You know, I. I say it's almost synonymous with psychology as a field. Um, but really what that means is trying to access your thoughts and trying to access. Why. Why do I do what I do? Why do I say what I said? Um, why do I think the way I do about people especially? Why. Why do I create the stories that I do about somebody based on a small interaction and an isolated experience and really just starting to get comfortable being uncomfortable with these conversations with ourselves. I don't think enough people do this, um, because I interviewed tons of leaders as part of this, this process. How often?
Speaker A: What's the frequency? What's the. I mean, imagine it's not something you're going to say, hey boss, I'm taking off three days to talk to myself, right? Is it you carve out a cup of coffee on a Monday morning or what? Is there a frequency? Is there a way? What. How would you prescribe this? What.
Speaker B: One of the great suggestions I heard many years ago was from Marshall Goldsmith and he said one thing you can do after each day is just ask yourself a couple of quick questions at the end of the day. What could I have done to be a better co worker? What could I have done to be a better at uh, delivering customer service? And that's a great place to start, a quick two minute daily reflection. But then I also think we should probably start to do things like more intentionally. Hey, I'm going to spend an hour and I'm just going to sit down with a notepad and I'm going to write about. Just get. And by the way, Arianna Huffington at a conference one day, uh, mentioned this, that women are much more likely to sit in silence and do really in self reflection than men. Um, I thought that was interesting. I kind of looked it up if that was true or find that it was. And so this is something I think it. Obviously some women need to hear this too. Obviously some men need to hear this too. Maybe some men do this already, but I think we all need to be able to spend some dedicated time really thinking deeply. And so cadence, that could be once a month that you sit and you have a 30 minute conversation with yourself and that might be your future self, you know.
Speaker A: Right.
Speaker B: And the book, I call that Travel Back to the Future, A, uh, nod to one of my favorite movies of all time.
Speaker A: Well, this has been great. I appreciate your time, so much insight here and I wish you the, the continued success with the book and, and all the other things you're working on.
Speaker B: So thank you so much, Peter. I really appreciate you having me. Love the questions.
Speaker A: To learn more about Thought Leadership leverage, please visit our website@thoughtleadershipleverage.com to reach me directly. Feel free to email me at Peter, uh, thought leadershipleverage.com and please subscribe to Leveraging Thought Leadership on itunes or your favorite podcast app. To get your weekly episode automatically.
Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.