The B2B Podcast Index
Index
All categories
MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
MethodologySubmit
Best of:MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
An independent project byFame
SearchBest episodesGuestsInsightsMethodologySubmit a podcast
Index/Leadership/Leadership Next
Leadership Next artwork

Why Circle’s CEO Says Stablecoin Regulation Is Essential | Leadership Next

Leadership Next · 2025-12-09 · 35 min

0:00--:--

Key moments - from our scoring

Substance score

60 / 100

Five dimensions, 20 points each

Insight Density12 / 20
Originality11 / 20
Guest Caliber16 / 20
Specificity & Evidence11 / 20
Conversational Craft10 / 20

Jeremy Allaire makes a compelling case for why stablecoins - specifically payment stablecoins like USDC that are fully reserved and pegged 1:1 to fiat currencies - represent a fundamentally different asset class from speculative cryptocurrencies and therefore merit careful legal frameworks. Unlike banks that lend out customer deposits, stablecoins hold high-quality reserves like Treasury bills, making them safer backing mechanisms. Allaire recounts his pivotal role in securing bipartisan support for the GENIUS Act, signed at the White House, which he describes as the only major bipartisan legislation passed in the recent Congress. He positions stablecoins as a national economic and security priority for maintaining dollar competitiveness. The conversation traces his entrepreneurial arc across three decades - from founding ColdFusion (later acquired by Macromedia, then Adobe for ~$5B) to building Brightcove into a public company powering major media brands' video platforms, to founding Circle in 2013. Allaire argues that blockchain technology and cryptographic innovations enable unprecedented transparency and auditability in economic systems, turning them into "trust machines" that can rebuild confidence in financial infrastructure through code-enforced transparency rather than opaque, centralized institutions.

Key takeaways

  • →Stablecoins legally defined as payment stablecoins must be issued 1:1 with fiat currency and backed by high-quality reserves like T-bills, making them fundamentally different from speculative cryptocurrencies and safer than fractional-reserve banking.
  • →The GENIUS Act represents a historic bipartisan breakthrough treating stablecoins as a national economic and security priority for dollar competitiveness, not just a fintech innovation.
  • →Blockchain enables real-time transparency, auditability, and cryptographic proof of transactions that traditional opaque banking systems cannot provide, making them potential 'trust machines' for rebuilding confidence in financial systems.
  • →Building transformative companies requires convincing talented people to embrace a mission (not just profit) and accept that the endeavor will be genuinely hard and require changing global policy.
  • →Allaire's consistent thesis across three decades and three companies centers on enabling the open internet to evolve into new layers of society - from information (web software) to media (video) to economic systems (stablecoins and blockchain).

In this episode

  1. 1Introduction to Stablecoins and Circle's Mission
  2. 2The White House Genius Act and Bipartisan Stablecoin Legislation
  3. 3Building Trust and Transparency in Digital Money
  4. 4Jeremy Allaire's Entrepreneurial Journey: From ColdFusion to Brightcove
  5. 5The Through-Line: Open Internet and Global Economic Integration
  6. 6Leadership Challenges and Near-Death Experiences

Mentioned

CircleJeremy AllaireUSDCBrightcoveMacromediaAdobeColdFusionFlashYouTubeSilicon Valley BankDeloitteGenius Act

Guests

Jeremy Allaire

Topics in this episode

StablecoinsUSDCCircleAdobeGENIUS ActblockchainCryptographyBrightcoveMacromediaColdFusion

Questions this episode answers

What is a stablecoin and how is it legally defined?

A stablecoin is a cryptocurrency pegged 1:1 to a fiat currency (dollar, euro, peso, etc.) and issued with full reserve backing in high-quality assets like Treasury bills or cash with central banks, making it redeemable and unlike fractional-reserve banks that lend out deposits.

What is the GENIUS Act and why does Jeremy Allaire say it matters?

The GENIUS Act is the only major bipartisan legislation passed in the recent Congress, establishing a legal framework for stablecoins that Allaire describes as a national economic and security priority for maintaining U.S. dollar competitiveness globally.

How do blockchains enable trust without traditional intermediaries?

Blockchains use cryptography and transparent, auditable code to prove ownership and execution of rules in real-time, allowing economic activity to move from opaque legacy systems into transparent networks where all transactions and contracts are verifiable and executable by code rather than relying on institutional trust.

What is Jeremy Allaire's background before founding Circle?

Allaire co-founded ColdFusion in the early 1990s (later acquired by Macromedia and then Adobe for ~$5 billion) and founded Brightcove in 2004, building it into a public company that powers video platforms for major media companies and brands.

Why did Jeremy Allaire focus on government regulation rather than avoiding it?

Allaire recognized early that reaching his vision for blockchain technology as a new economic infrastructure layer would require changing policies and laws in the world's biggest countries, so he chose to embrace this challenge rather than build in regulatory ambiguity.

What our scoring noted

Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.

Insight Density

12 / 20

The episode contains substantive explanations of stablecoin mechanics, regulatory frameworks, and Allaire's entrepreneurial philosophy, but is diluted by significant filler including a lengthy tangent on personal fitness, childhood baseball cards, and broad historical narratives about platform shifts (mobile, AI) that don't yield actionable business insights. The core regulatory and payment infrastructure insights are sound but spread thin across 35 minutes.

a stablecoin is uh, issued on a one for one basis with an existing fiat currency, a dollar, a euro, a Hong Kong dollar, a peso, etc. So it's fully reserved. It's typically by law required to be held in the safest of, uh, backing assets.
The early adopter phase of blockchain network technology is not the technology that we need for this mainstream scaling phase.

Originality

11 / 20

Allaire articulates a coherent thesis about regulation-as-enabler and distinguishes stablecoins from broader crypto, which is contrarian for 2024. However, the framing of blockchain as 'trust machines' and the mobile/platform comparison are well-worn tech industry analogies. His personal entrepreneurial journey and the bipartisan legislation angle are competently told but not novel thinking.

these are bipartisan issues, uh, and whether it's a stablecoin issues or right now new laws that are being discussed around the structure of digital tokens and the markets for digital tokens. Again, very bipartisan issue
cryptography gives us, with math, the ability to prove things

Guest Caliber

16 / 20

Allaire is highly credible: three-time founder/public company builder (ColdFusion/Macromedia, Brightcove, Circle), direct White House access, 12 years of Capitol Hill testimony, and operational stake in stablecoin regulation as Circle's CEO. He has genuinely done the thing at scale and shaped policy, though the hosts don't aggressively test his claims or push on competitive vulnerabilities.

I've been going to the Capitol for 12 years, testifying to Senate, uh, the House, meeting with policymakers in every country in the world, and really for five years trying to work with members of Congress to enact a stablecoin bill.
Circle is a, uh, supports both the Republican Party, the Democratic Party

Specificity & Evidence

11 / 20

The episode offers concrete details on the GENIUS Act passage, SVB crisis impact ('5 to 10,000 companies were debanked in a matter of three days'), and USDC 1:1 backing mechanics. However, there are few named financial institutions, specific metrics on Circle's scale or market share, dollar figures, or timelines for ARK rollout. Allaire's claims about regulatory frameworks and mainstream adoption are largely asserted rather than evidenced with data.

There were four or five banks that failed. Multiple, uh, banks seized simultaneously. The entire digital asset industry, like 5 to 10,000 companies were debanked in a matter of three days.
issued on a one for one basis with an existing fiat currency, a dollar, a euro, a Hong Kong dollar, a peso, etc.

Conversational Craft

10 / 20

The hosts (Diane Brady and Kristen Stoler) ask competent but largely softball questions that allow Allaire to deliver prepared narratives. Follow-ups are minimal; they don't press on SVB's timing, Circle's competitive moat vs. Tether, or the political risk of stablecoin concentration. The fitness tangent and extended entrepreneurial backstory suggest the hosts let the guest control pacing rather than drive toward substance.

Diane Brady: Doesn't it help to have a nemesis? Because you were certainly the nemesis for Tether.
Kristen Stoler: I'd be remiss, not to mention that if I look at pictures of you several years ago, you're a different, smaller, leaner man today. Do you think that's actually...

Conversation analysis

Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.

Share of words spoken

  • Speaker A77%
  • Speaker B13%
  • Speaker C7%
  • Speaker D3%

Most-used words

technology24world18internet18system16economic15global13money12circle11building11interested11first10stablecoin10blockchain10digital9possible9different8

Episode notes

Circle, one of the world’s largest issuers of stablecoin, went public in June 2025, breaking new ground as the first U.S. stablecoin issuer to do so. Circle issues the world’s second largest dollar-backed stablecoin, USDC, and largest euro-backed stablecoin, EURC. Chairman and CEO of Circle, Jeremy Allaire, spoke to Fortune’s executive editorial director Diane Brady and editorial director Kristin Stoller about the digital currency and how he sees the future of crypto. In this episode of Leadership Next, they discuss why Allaire is lobbying for government regulation of stablecoin and why he says there needs to be global policy change to meet the new internet financial system.

Full transcript

35 min

Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.

Speaker A: I knew that it was going to require changing global policy to take on this technology and in turn changing the policies and laws of the biggest countries in the world.

Speaker B: Hi everyone. Welcome to Leadership Next, the podcast about the people and trends that are shaping the future of business. I'm Diane Brady.

Speaker C: And I'm Kristen Stoler.

Speaker B: This week we are speaking with Jeremy Allaire, the CEO of the very popular ipo.

Speaker C: This year circle first time that he spoke with us, which is at the Fortune Global Forum in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. And it was months after he had been at the White House in July when President Trump was establishing a legal framework for stablecoins when they signed the Genius act together. So he talks to us about that.

Speaker B: Well, that's what they do basically is the USDC stablecoin. And he has been a lone wolf out there for many years talking about the need for regulation. He, he very much distinguishes between a lot of the cryptocurrencies out there, stablecoin being very different and just the whole realm of blockchain financial innovation. He's a three time entrepreneur and founded

Speaker C: brightcove and we talk a lot about trust, about regulation, um, about the balance he's felt between innovation and also lobbying on the Hill as well.

Speaker B: Definitely a role that has a more political tone in this environment. And I think it is an area everybody's curious about because the words financial and innovation have not always ended well in this country and he has very different predictions for what the future looks like. So we'll be right back with Jeremy after this break. Quantum computing has the potential to transform industries by solving optimization problems, boosting machine learning and sparking innovation in logistics, finance and material science. Jason Gurzada, CEO of Deloitte US is a longtime sponsor of this podcast and is here with us today. Hi Jason, thanks for joining us.

Speaker D: Great to see you, Diane.

Speaker B: So what is quantum computing and how do you see it transforming industries?

Speaker D: Well, quantum computing has been a topic for some time, uh, in research, um, circles, uh, certainly closely watched by business. But it's fundamentally a different computing paradigm, uh, that uses the principles of physics instead of mathematics to drive computing outcomes. It's been largely the domain of research and it's becoming seen as being a more viable commercial computing methodology and approach. And I think the real uses will be ultimately around very complex optimization scenarios, further enhancements to scaling, machine learning, and also very complicated simulations that could, uh, be relevant to a whole host of different business, uh, applications.

Speaker C: Jason, what steps should leaders take to prepare for both its potential benefits as well as its Potential risks.

Speaker D: It's really about readiness, planning right now, um, and preparing an organization to understand the implications. So it's about understanding what skill sets would be required, what type of, uh, cybersecurity protocols would need to be in place and begin to think about the types of use cases that would be, uh, very germane around optimization and simulation.

Speaker C: Excellent advice. Thank you so much, Jason.

Speaker B: Jeremy, let's start with the basics of what is stablecoin.

Speaker A: This word stablecoin kind of emerged organically. It was not a word we chose. And the most obvious uh, definition is sort of you have all these cryptocurrencies that are volatile and not stable. And so something came along that was a cryptocurrency that was stable, therefore a stable coin. Now the definitions around this have really gotten more precise. And so I think that the most important definition is actually the legal definition. So what's happened over the past few years is that stablecoins, a particular form of stablecoins, have been codified into banking and payments law in many of the

Speaker B: biggest jurisdictions in the world, which is pegged to the.

Speaker A: And yes. So in this definition a stablecoin, what is often in the U.S. for example, the law calls these payment stablecoins. But in these legal frameworks, a stablecoin is uh, issued on a one for one basis with an existing fiat currency, a dollar, a euro, a Hong Kong dollar, a peso, etc. So it's fully reserved. It's typically by law required to be held in the safest of, uh, backing assets. So unlike a bank which you give a bank a dollar, they go lend it and invest it 12 times. That's why there's all this risk in banking. Whereas a stablecoin always needs to be redeemable. And so by holding it in these very, very safe like T bills or cash with the big cash custodians of the world, or even holding money with the central bank itself. So this, uh, this one for one backing this high quality reserves. And then oftentimes from a technological perspective, what makes these unique and uh, powerful is that the digital currency unit that you issue, the so called stablecoin like usdc, um, is something that just free circulates on the Internet. And so you're basically untethering the money from the legacy electronic money system and turning it into actual digital assets. Actual digital currency that can move around the Internet at the speed of the Internet with very low costs and with high utility.

Speaker C: Um, you've had quite a win with that recently too. In July, I believe, you were at the White House with President Trump establishing the legal framework for stablecoins, the genius act. Yeah. Tell us about what that was like. Despite describe the scene. How are you feeling? What was it like meeting with President Trump?

Speaker A: Well, you know, it's an amazing experience. Um, and a lot of times people see these things and they think, wow, this is. Where did this come from? I didn't know about this. Well, I've been going to the Capitol for 12 years, testifying to Senate, uh, the House, meeting with policymakers in every country in the world, and really for five years trying to work with members of Congress to enact a stablecoin bill. And there has been in fact a very strong bipartisan effort for many years to do that. And it really all culminated obviously in uh, the past several months, uh, as this actually got momentum and bipartisan momentum. And one thing I like to always remind people is that this is the only major piece of bipartisan legislation passed in this Congress. It is in fact bipartisan super majority in the Senate, really broad support in the House. And so this issue of how do we upgrade the dollar, how do we make the dollar more competitive, how do we unleash uh, the market with safety and soundness and consumer protection built in, how do we do that is a national economic, if not national security priority. So that was really the backdrop for this. And then so coming to the White House and being part of the actual event itself, uh, yes, I certainly got to meet the President.

Speaker B: Uh, you're a big donor to the president, so I assume you met him before.

Speaker A: So. Actually uh, I had not uh, met President Trump before. And um, circle, ah, is a, uh, supports both the Republican Party, the Democratic Party, as I like to say. You know, circle is purple. You know, we uh, recognize that these are bipartisan issues, uh, and whether it's a stablecoin issues or right now new laws that are being discussed around the structure of digital tokens and the markets for digital tokens. Again, very bipartisan issue and we're seeing that. Um, and you know, we're in the early days of this technological development. Uh, the laws and, and policies that will need to deal with this new Internet financial system are going to continue on for the next five years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years. So we take a long term view on how the, you know, the existing legal systems we have are going to evolve.

Speaker C: It certainly seems easier under this administration to get all this through or how are you feeling?

Speaker B: I feel like that's a complicated.

Speaker C: Yeah, because I'm curious your take on that.

Speaker A: There is no doubt that, um, this administration, uh, saw the development of blockchain technology, digital assets, um, and stablecoins as an important technology area. Uh, just like AI is an important technology area, there's other important technology areas, and made a big push to take what had been already, I think, well, moving pieces of legislation and really push that. Um, but also I think it's a innovation forward, technology forward, uh, entrepreneur forward, environment. And that's very positive from my perspective. Uh, and so we're seeing that, and I give the administration a lot of credit for really seeing this as an innovation issue, not just a risk issue.

Speaker B: Yeah, I think it's one of the areas people do look at and see a win. You have been, especially in this iteration with Circle. You've. You've been talking to Elizabeth Warren, you have, um, with Tether and Howard Lutnick. I mean, I feel like you've been out there creating a market, um, building legitimacy for this. And in many cases, to me, you've seemed like you've been alone in a lot of those pursuits, just from being a figurehead in the industry. Did that take any courage or was it just, hey, if I don't do it, my industry, this company, won't exist?

Speaker A: I think it's really more the latter. Um, and actually, one thing I'd say is when I got started with the company, one of the things that was very clear to me is to reach the ambition of what I saw becoming possible. I knew that it was going to require changing global policy, not just like literally changing global policy, and in turn changing the policies and laws of the biggest countries in the world and to actually update them to kind of take on this technology. And that's generally not something that an entrepreneur goes, yeah, but that's actually what I felt. And I felt like at that stage in my career, which again was back in 2013, like, that's really hard, but it's worth it. I have this high conviction, I have this belief system and, and I'm trying to provide leadership. Um, and I think it's been effective, and I've grown a huge amount from that experience.

Speaker C: I think you said it right, that there's a lot of misconceptions out there about what you're trying to do. I think in this moment especially, people are really hesitant to trust government, big tech, especially as it relates to money. So who do you think we should trust with our money in this digital economy?

Speaker A: Certainly as a firm. Right. We've gone out of our way to be trusted and transparent and compliant and have good governance and so on. But one of the things I'd say is what's really powerful about, um, blockchains and cryptography and cryptographic innovations in money and economic systems is they actually give us an underlying set of materials to work with that societies never really had. They give us this material where all of the building blocks of economic activity, from who owns what to who transfers what, to who borrows what, to what risk is underlying that, to, um, the entire life cycle of economic activity can be moved from the, let's just call it the paper legacy electronic world into something where everything is transparent, provable, auditable, uh, in real time, where you can have the execution of rules and contracts in code and have that all be audible in real time. And so this is, you know, part of this is, you know, the reason people call blockchains because trust machines or truth machines is that cryptography gives us, with math, the ability to prove things. And so I think a big part of the impetus not just for Circle, but for so many others in the industry, is how do we build a more trustworthy economic system with more transparency, more inclusiveness, more visibility, as opposed to one which is opaque and centralized and. And we don't really know what's going on and where that opacity and the risks that are embedded in that opacity are really challenges. So I think it's part of a technology movement to build a more trusted infrastructure.

Speaker B: Blockchain, for sure. I want to go back, not totally to the beginning, unless you have some childhood memories you want to share, but your first company you co founded, talk about the genesis of that, because I'd like to take a bit of a walk through the Jeremy Allaire greatest works because you have had a, I think, an interesting history that's brought you to where you are today.

Speaker A: Yeah, I mean, look, um, the only thing I'll say that's relevant from my childhood is I was very lucky to be, uh, born in the Apple II generation and had access to, like, really great personal computing technology when I was really young. And so that captured my imagination about what's possible when you have this, this technology at your fingertips.

Speaker B: You're Talking about that 1984 commercial before then even.

Speaker C: Well, you started your first venture at 14, correct?

Speaker A: That is actually true. Uh, Allaire Sports Cards, uh, was the first venture, which actually, in the end, has been quite successful, uh, because I have unearthed, uh, some of these baseball cards recently. Oh, and now they're valuable with my daughters. And I was like, wow, these are so valuable.

Speaker C: What was it explain it to us.

Speaker A: I mean, basically, uh, you know, I actually, it had to do with the computer as well, which is, um, I was really interested in baseball, uh, interested in trading cards, because kids that age were trading cards and actually through my brother, um, got really interested in. Could you actually predict, statistically predict who would be the good players and who wouldn't.

Speaker B: You were Moneyballing early on.

Speaker A: Uh, so Bill James is the famous econometrician who wrote the kind of book on the sort of applying statistical, uh, metrics to baseball, which then actually relates to the movie Moneyball, which, uh, is a great book. Um, so, uh, basically when my grandparents died, my brother and I each got a little bit of money, uh, very small, uh, and I convinced my parents to let me just use it to buy baseball cards and start a baseball card business. So I was trading cards, uh, going to trade shows, all of that, but also was trying to use spreadsheets, which was very novel at the time to be able to forecast, uh, like which players might be based on their prior record and then bet on them. Buy them.

Speaker B: I'll buy them.

Speaker A: Accumulate the cards. Right, accumulate the cards, um, going into the season and then see how the season goes. But to make a long story short, um, yeah, I mean, I use this to help pay for college, uh, uh, or at least the spending money of college and so on.

Speaker C: Um, so lucrative business for you. There you go.

Speaker A: I think. Um, you know, kind of coming back to the other question though. Um, during college in 1990, I got really lucky and got connected to the precursor to the Internet. It was an academic network that was part of a network of academic networks that were connected to other networks of academic networks around the world. But that was the Internet. And I became completely obsessed with this. And, um, the. There are a lot of experiences that I had at the time in 1990, 91, 92. But basically it became my obsession. And I was interested in how this could be commercialized as an infrastructure. Um, was fascinated by the technology protocols of it itself. And really when I graduated college, um, in 1993, not a technical background, political science, uh, philosophy, economics as a background.

Speaker B: It's usually you study to go into office the ppe. Ah, isn't it ppe?

Speaker A: Yeah, exactly. Um, but I was quite interested in the impact of this globally available technology and how it could actually change society. Um, and that really led before the web really existed. I was very passionate about all these ideas. And then in the very early genesis of web technology, um, really saw the opportunity to, um, essentially create a way for people to actually create interactive software that can run through these, um, emergent web browsers and kind of unlock interactivity and commerce and other things on the Internet. So that first business, we created a product called ColdFusion.

Speaker B: We being who?

Speaker A: Uh, my brother and myself and some other college friends who are really involved in the startup, and had a highly successful product that millions of people used our products and grew to be kind of some of the most popular tools for building the web and building a lot of capabilities that people had on the web.

Speaker B: I've used Bright Cove, but that's part two.

Speaker A: Yeah, that is part two. Yes. Exactly. So really the first phase was about kind of using enabling the web as an application platform, which was a novel idea. In 1994, 1995, that was a public company. We were public for a couple of years. The dot com crash happened. We merged with a larger, um, Internet software company, Macromedia, where I was cto, and then that became you guys collapse.

Speaker B: Did your stock, I mean, I mean,

Speaker A: um, the public company, in the fall of 2000. Yeah, it got hit like a lot of other stocks. Yeah, yeah, but we actually merged. And in fact the merged entity, you know, we launched some incredible technology and products, uh, and that, that turned into a highly successful growing business that then eventually Adobe bought for, I think, almost $5 billion. Um, but in the meantime, I had then become very interested in how could the open Internet, just like we had the open Internet of information, how could the open Internet become an environment for richer forms of media like we're doing right here.

Speaker C: Exactly.

Speaker A: Video and television and that I sort of envisioned that there'd be this explosion in how television would be sort of recast and transformed, and then founded Brightcove in 2004, um, on the backs of having created key technology to make video usable on the Internet, which was Flash, the same technology that made YouTube possible, also made Brightcove possible. And, um, we built that, I built that, uh, ultimately into another global publicly traded company that powers still today, many major media companies, online, video and brands and others as well.

Speaker B: You know, it's interesting. Do you see a through line in terms of the types of companies that you like to build? I do. But I'm just curious if you do in terms of just what you gravitate toward 100%.

Speaker A: I mean, at the bottom of this or at the foundation of this is really my belief that the open Internet built on open networks, uh, uh, open software, that it increasingly kind of evolves into more and more layers of what society is. And I've been Interested in sort of the different kind of shifts of societal functioning from information to media to communications, um, etc. Always been interested in the DNA of the Internet and how it applies to those things. So that's always been there also very much with a goal of connecting the world more deeply and how to connect the world more deeply. Um, a kind of view that the Internet as a economic platform, uh, is one which can help drive not just global growth, um, but, but more importantly like stronger forms of integration, um, for the whole world. And uh, so that's been an animating thesis, uh, for me since 19, uh, 90, really when I first got interested in this. Um, and wow, that's 35 years now. That's amazing. So wild. Um, but you're so healthy.

Speaker B: Someday you'll be saying, gee, that was 60 years ago,

Speaker A: we'll try. That is sort of the backdrop. And I think, um, when I was first getting introduced to the Internet in the early 90s, you know, what I was thinking about academically was how does the world work? How does the economic system work? What are these different international political and economic structures? It was the end of the Cold War, it was kind of quote, unquote, the end of history, uh, uh, at the time. And so I was very interested in, you know, what shapes that could take. And really that kind of brings us full circle to Circle itself, which is after the global financial crisis in 2008 and 2009, my interests in the global political economy, as I call it, uh, were very seriously rekindled and I became extremely interested in, well, what went wrong here? What's, what are the issues in the global banking system? What are the issues in the monetary system? What, like what, what can be changed? And I got, I developed a lot of ideas, but I didn't have anywhere to put them at the time because I was more like an armchair academic, uh, you know, running a video company. Um, and that really led me in uh, 2012 to kind of connect the dots between this innovation of crypto as a technology and these ideas about how one might be able to reshape the way the global economic system works. Um, and the more I thought about it, the more obsessed I got about it and the more it really led me to want to found circle, uh, in 2013.

Speaker C: Well, we've talked about Circle's recent successes, but I know the road hasn't always been easy for you. There have been a couple near death experiences, Silicon Valley bank being one. Walk us through those and your leadership during those times and how you came out of It.

Speaker A: Well, I would say, just as a general comment, um, entrepreneurship is very difficult. Um, and, uh, starting a business, starting anything, whether it's social entrepreneurship or business entrepreneurship. But entrepreneurship is very difficult because generally you see something that's possible that doesn't exist yet. And so the cognitive bias of almost everyone in the world will be, essentially, we've already solved that. Why do we need that? And it's just really built in. There's this cognitive bias that people have against these new things. Now, um, in my case, you know, in 2013, when it was like, there's going to be a whole new infrastructure layer for the global economic system. It's going to transform the nature of money. We're going to have new forms, uh, of money.

Speaker B: We're going to eventually all the banks,

Speaker A: we're going to eventually have, you know, uh, machines intermediating all of the economic world and like, and, and in my mind, like, that'll take 10, 20 years, et cetera. But, like, it's going to happen. And I'm going to start by building on top of Bitcoin. And, you know, Judge, uh, Dredd, uh, was just arrested. And, you know, the only headlines about this are all about the dark web and so on. Let's just say, like, even though I had taken two companies public, the sheer amount of, of skepticism and frankly, concern, like, can I even. Should I be talking to you? Are you, like, are you legitimate? Are you involved in some, like, whatever? Um, and so, like, you just face incredible hurdles. And so from the very beginning, um, whether it's the first company or the second company or this company, first you have to convince people to come along with you who believe in the vision, who believe in the mission. It has to be a mission. It can't just be, we're going to build something and make a bunch of money. Um, there has to be a mission. And, you know, you got to convince people that it's possible and it's going to be hard. You have to always tell people, this is going to be hard. And you only want people who join, who are like, yeah, I want something hard. Like, if they want something easy, there's plenty of other places to go. If you want something hard, come here and you're going to, you're going to face that. So one is just building mission, vision into the culture, building and understanding that this is going to be hard. These are really key things to develop resilience. Because no matter what, whether it's today, where Circle is, uh, a global, publicly traded company, or when I started and everything in between. You're going to constantly face crises, setbacks, challenges. You're going to have things that are in your control and you're going to have things that are out of your control.

Speaker B: Doesn't it help to have a nemesis? Because you were certainly the nemesis for Tether. For example, I remember Silicon Valley bank where they had a field day because they were not going for the kind of the route you were taking. Um, saying, well, look, here's what happens when you do go within the system. Do you find that motivating, having these others that have looked at you as an alternative that they were trying to differentiate themselves from?

Speaker A: Yeah, I mean, look, um, when I look at things, I generally am not looking at like a nemesis or this or that. Um, always have to be aware of, like what, what other things are happening around and, and the market itself. Like people who want to use these technologies are going to be giving you feedback. Why do I want to use it? Why do I not want to use it? Like what, what would be better? Um, but for the most part, right when you're dealing with something as new as this, as like we've invented a new form of digital dollars, that's pretty cool. Um, now when, when you're dealing with something that new, the vast majority of the opportunity is still in front of you. It's, it's not, it's not sort of what's going on around you right now, it's sort of in front of you. And so it really depends on kind of what your ultimate end state goal is. And so for us, we've always known that we want to build something that is trusted, transparent, compliant, well integrated with the existing financial system and helps accelerate and build off of that. And had a very high conviction that, um, would be the right strategy. And there may be other strategies, there may be other strategies that are also successful. But like, that strategy we felt very strongly was one that, you know, we could build on.

Speaker C: Well, circling back and again, no pun intended, was there ever a moment that you felt like, oh, this, this could be it for the company and how to come back from that?

Speaker A: I mean, multiple times. Yeah, I mean, I think, uh, whether it was the Silicon Valley bank, uh, you know, the bank failures, and by the way, it wasn't just svb. There were four or five banks that failed. Multiple, uh, banks seized simultaneously. The entire digital asset industry, like 5 to 10,000 companies were debanked in a matter of three days. Yeah, like just a massive, massive shock. Right. So it wasn't just the issue with svp. It was really like this broader kind of debt debanking of an entire industry, which created enormous challenges, and obviously, um, we responded extremely well to that. And actually we sit here today where our infrastructure runs with many of the world's global, systemically important banks. We have the best custodians in the world. We have a robust regulatory framework on it. The scale of. Of liquidity and operations and so on is just extraordinary.

Speaker B: A very successful ipo, definitely.

Speaker A: Yeah.

Speaker B: I want to just, uh. I'd be remiss, not to mention that if I look at pictures of you several years ago, you're a different, smaller, leaner man today. Do you think that's actually. Obviously, tell us your secrets, but I'm curious, how important do you feel your journey to wellness, weight loss, et cetera, was in the success of the company?

Speaker A: I think it's very important. Yeah, very important. I think, um.

Speaker B: Is there a moment where you stood there and said, okay, that's it?

Speaker A: Well, I'd say, uh, a lot of, um, my desire to live well and live long, uh, really comes from the love that I have for my children and my wife and my family. That's really at the center of that, um, um, because I want to. I want to be as healthy as possible for. For my family. In the end, all of it kind of works together, right? So, uh, mental wellness, physical wellness, uh, you know, spiritual wellness, like, all of this works together so you can be a better person, you can connect and work better with people. You can. You're more resilient, you can handle more stress, you can handle more complexity. You can be more attuned to people and connect better with people. Your children, your spouse, others. So it all works together in my view. And so, um, I think that's certainly what I've experienced.

Speaker C: So, Jeremy, you recently made a announcement about a new blockchain. Can you talk to us about that and why, when there are so many blockchains out there today?

Speaker A: So, yeah, so, um, uh, we've announced ark, um, a new layer one blockchain network. And we're really positioning ARK as an economic operating system for the Internet. And, um, really, when we got started in this, uh, back in 2013, blockchain technology was very immature. Uh, there was really only one blockchain. It was very limited in what it could do. And gradually, over the last five to 10 years, we've seen blockchain technology maturing. Um, but broadly over the last 10 years, also, it's been kind of the early adopter phase. And if you think Back to other big kind of platform shifts in technology. Um, there are these extensive periods of time, sometimes 10, 15, 20 years, where people are really going after something, uh, but it's still not all the way there. AI was like that actually for decades. Um, mobile was like that. You know, there was Mobile World Congress where hundreds of thousands of people would go and there were like many billion dollar companies building mobile handsets and different platforms. You remember the Palm Pilot or the BlackBerry or the Windows Phone or. I mean so, so many. I wanted them all, everyone wanted them all. They're like, oh, this is going to be the one, this is going to be the one that makes it better, it's going to be easier. But none of them were any good actually. And then you kind of hit an inflection point and a number of things happened simultaneously. The 3G adoption, uh, the touchscreen innovation, um, and building the right kind of operating, uh, system, uh, for that era, which is really what iOS did and what Apple achieved. And that was like this huge inflection point. And like all that stuff just looked like noise at that point. Now I don't know that that's exactly where we are, but what I can tell you is that um, the early adopter phase of blockchain network technology is not the technology that we need for this mainstream scaling phase. And so as Circle, we've worked with many of the leading institutions in the world as they've begun to use things like stablecoins and blockchains. We learned a lot and uh, so we've been able to build a purpose built blockchain network with the needs of the mainstream economic system in mind. It has a lot of very distinct capabilities from a technology, from a governance, from other perspective. And we're really, we're trying to paint with a slightly um, bigger canvas here, which is our idea is that this is actually a new operating system paradigm, just like mobile or cloud or the desktop.

Speaker B: Right?

Speaker A: The economic operating systems, which are actually these infrastructures that are available that will bring not just moving money, but the entirety of what it is to operate uh, in the economy. What is a firm? What are contracts? How does AI interact with that? We're actually building a layer in anticipation of this literal upgrading of the economic system onto the Internet. And we believe it's one of the largest opportunities possible, possible and we're bringing amazing companies in. As, as you've seen from our announcement, some of the world's leading companies, leading financial companies, technology companies, others are joining us and exploring this and building on this final question.

Speaker B: For me. This is a podcast about leadership. What do you think at this juncture is one of the underappreciated qualities to be a great leader right now?

Speaker A: M being able to be calm.

Speaker B: Calm. So calm. Um, calm.

Speaker A: Calmness.

Speaker C: That's a good one. Well, thank you so much, Jeremy.

Speaker B: Thank you, Jeremy.

Related episodes across the Index

Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.

  • Moat Investing Nuances - Pat Dorsey (EP.509)Capital Allocators · on Adobe94 / 100
  • Trust, stablecoins, and the AI margin squeeze:What McKinsey and QED's fintech report means for banksTearsheet Podcast: Exploring Financial Services Together · on Stablecoins89 / 100
  • Mastercard CEO: AI Shopping Agents, Machine-to-Machine Payments, and the New Infrastructure of CommerceMotley Fool Hidden Gems Investing · on Stablecoins88 / 100
  • Interview: Maple Cofounder Joe FlanaganFintech Business Podcast · on USDC85 / 100
  • The stablecoin revolution is here - are banks ready?London Fintech Podcast · on Stablecoins84 / 100
  • 30 July 2026 Podcast Erik Van Bramer from Federal Reserve Financial ServicesOff the Rails from the U.S. Faster Payments Council - FPC · on Stablecoins83 / 100

More from Leadership Next

All episodes →
  • 2025 Recap: CEOs discuss embracing AI, tracking wellness, and marketing for Gen Z | Leadership Next43 / 100
  • Expedia’s CEO on the U.S. tourism slowdown, AI, and 2026 travel predictions | Leadership Next62 / 100
  • Ad legend Dani Richa on AI, risk taking, and how advertising has changed70 / 100
  • Why entrepreneur Alexis Ohanian is doubling down on women’s sports | Leadership Next78 / 100
  • Why the Company Built on the Mouse Is Going All-In on Gaming | Leadership Next
Explore the best B2B Leadership podcasts →
All Leadership Next episodes →