Hope + Possibilities · 2025-09-19 · 14 min
Key moments - from our scoring
Substance score
22 / 100
Five dimensions, 20 points each
Nola Simon explores why the phrase "I don't want to be political" reflects structural privilege rather than neutrality. Drawing on her personal journey advocating for remote work and flexible schedules to balance parenting, she argues that any deviation from workplace norms - whether time flexibility, location flexibility, or pushing for policy change - constitutes political action. She contextualizes this through her family history: born to parents on opposite sides of World War II, she learned early that survival sometimes means navigating systems you don't agree with, and that silence benefits those already in power. Simon connects workplace flexibility to broader political issues like pay equity, paid time off, and employment rights, suggesting that women's historical exclusion from financial systems and property rights makes speaking up particularly radical. She challenges business leaders to consider whether silence actually serves their interests, positioning authentic advocacy as central to building the future of work they want to see.
Because advocating for changes to work norms like remote work, flexible hours, or time off deviates from the status quo and challenges existing power structures around how work is organized - which involves real estate, compensation, technology, policy, and community impact.
Her parents were born on opposite sides of World War II in 1930-1932; her father lived through Nazi Germany as a regular citizen navigating an oppressive system. This taught her that survival sometimes requires operating within systems you don't agree with, and that silence is not neutral but advantageous to those in power.
She references Cindy Gallup's concept that women have historically been excluded from property rights, financial systems, lending, and even bank accounts within her lifetime - so speaking up as a woman or caregiver represents a break from established norms in a way men's voices do not.
Yes, but strategically: through respectful debate grounded in concrete facts focused on creating the future of work you want, not through constant online arguments with strangers that are unproductive and performative.
Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.
The episode consists primarily of personal memoir and philosophical musing about politics and caregiving rather than actionable insights for B2B operators. While the host touches on work flexibility, compensation, and policy, these are discussed at an abstract level without concrete frameworks, data, or novel claims that a business practitioner couldn't already infer.
standing up and asking for what it is you want when it's not the norm is a political act and advocating and becoming a subject matter expert and, changing your job to have better opportunities to do what it is you need to do for your family. Those are political acts.
to be a caregiver is to be fundamentally political.
The core argument - that the personal is political and that not speaking up reinforces existing systems - is well-established feminist discourse from decades past. The framing of remote work advocacy as political action is presented as novel but lacks fresh perspective or counterintuitive insight. The guest does not challenge conventional progressive thought; she affirms it without new evidence or frameworks.
You feel safer not saying anything than actually saying something, which means that honestly, in effect, you're okay with the way the world is working.
women are not the status quo because women have never been the status quo.
This is a solo monologue by the host, not a guest interview. The host Nola Simon appears to be a podcaster and presumably a real estate professional, but provides no credential verification, business scale evidence, or demonstrated operator expertise relevant to B2B audiences. The episode lacks the rigor of interviewing a practitioner with measurable outcomes.
I'm Nola Simon. I'm the host of the Hope and Possibilities podcast
What I do involves real estate. It involves the way things work.
The episode relies almost entirely on personal anecdotes and one passing reference to Cindy Gallop. No concrete business metrics, case studies, timelines, percentages, company examples, or verifiable data are provided. The claims about work flexibility, caregiving, and politics remain at the level of abstraction and lived experience rather than evidence-based argument.
my hours were 10 to six
My mom was born in 1930. My dad was born in 1932.
This is a solo monologue with no interviews, guest interaction, or follow-up questions. The host does not challenge her own assumptions or engage in productive debate. There is no conversational back-and-forth that would test ideas or uncover nuance. The format is a lecture/essay rather than dialogue.
Hi, thanks for joining me. I'm Nola Simon. I'm the host of the Hope and Possibilities podcast
I'd love to hear your thoughts. Rules of engagement are respect and concrete facts and polite discourse.
Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.
If you say you don't want to be political, it's often because the system is already working for you. For those of us who've had to fight for flexibility, access, or equity - that's never been an option. The Privilege of Silence When someone says, "I don't do politics," what they're really saying is that they're comfortable with the way things are. That comfort signals that their own ease matters more than the discomfort others experience under the same system. For many people - including me - that kind of silence has never been an option. Personal Experience When I became a parent, I had no choice but to advocate for more flexibility in my work life. The traditional nine-to-five structure simply didn't accommodate what my family needed. My husband's self-employment gave us some breathing room, but it still wasn't an ideal solution. I had to push against systems that weren't built with me - or families like mine - in mind. The Political Nature of Advocacy And that's the thing: standing up for what you need, especially when it's outside the norm, is inherently political. Asking for flexibility, becoming a subject matter expert, speaking out publicly - these are all political acts.
Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.
Find yourself in. Hi, thanks for joining me. I'm Nola Simon. I'm the host of the Hope and Possibilities podcast, and I wanted to just talk about the fact that somebody told me the other day that they preferred not to be political, and I get where they're coming from because.
Especially if you're talking about politics or anything political online. If you get into an algorithm and people are engaging in outrage and shaming and all of that stuff, it actually seems pretty scary. And you're worried about reputation. You're worried about how it could affect your business.
You're worried about all of that stuff. But the thing that. I have about that statement is it's coming from an area of privilege. You feel safer not saying anything than actually saying something, which means that honestly, in effect, you're okay with the way the world is working.
You're okay with the way things are shaking out, and you are comfort. Is more important than your discomfort. So that's not my reality, and it has not been my reality for a very long time. I'd say actually ever since I became a parent, that has not been my reality because the world of work in particular was not working the way that I needed it to.
And so that's where I started advocating for. More flexibility in my work. So work from home, remote work, hybrid, or whatever you wanna call it. I needed more of that.
Honestly, if they had been able to work with me and give me time, flexibility. Time flexibility. I could have worked around and I wouldn't necessarily have campaigned for location flexibility, but there was an absolute insistence that I had to have set hours. And in particular, once I had my kids, my hours were 10 to six, so that was okay in the morning.
I could at least drop my kids off at daycare or school or whatever it happened to be, but it didn't work well in the evenings. And we were able to adapt to it for a bit because my husband got laid off and he became self-employed and he therefore had that time flexibility because he didn't have a boss he had to report to. But ideally, that's not the parent that I wanted to be. And also moms take care of everything, or at least that has been my reality is.
I needed to be there because I, my kids needed me, right? And that was the mother I wanted to be. And so standing up and asking for what it is you want when it's not the norm is a political act and advocating and becoming a subject matter expert and, changing your job to have better opportunities to do what it is you need to do for your family. Those are political acts.
Speaking about it publicly, that's a political act. Being interviewed in media to share your perspective, your point of view, your agenda, those are political acts. So somebody who says they don't wanna be political. Congratulations.
You are able to navigate the world in a way that a lot of us can't in the current system as it exists right at this moment. So women historically have been caregivers, but women also historically. Have not been the dominant power in politics. And so speaking up is a radical act.
For years, we didn't have property rights, we didn't have access to financial systems, we didn't have access to lending, we didn't have access to even create bank accounts. That financial independence, that ability to stand on your own two feet, nevermind, speak about what it is you needed to be able to stand on your own two feet. That was. Forbidden.
And that's within my lifetime, right? The bank account thing, the lending, the credit products, all of that's within my lifetime. So women, Cindy Gallup is a marketer. She has a company that she advocates for, which is called Make Love not Porn, and.
She has a quote that she mentions quite frequently, which is women are not the status quo because women have never been the status quo. So to be a caregiver is to be fundamentally political. What I do involves real estate. It involves the way things work.
It involves compensation, it involves technology, it involves process, procedures, policy, how you are in community, how that impacts urban planning, how that impacts commuting. All of that is political and fundamentally, it's a part of my work. When you say that you don't wanna be political, it's because that system works for you in lots of ways and you don't wanna jeopardize that. Now, I also came from.
A Canadian company that owned a US division. And so my customers, for the longest time I was there 16 years were actually in the States. Fundamentally, I know what that's like to behave in a way when your politics, your beliefs don't match those of your clients. So I believe in universal healthcare.
I believe in gun control. I believe in. Employment rights. I believe in pay equity.
I believe in paid time off. I believe what I believe is really in direct contrast to a lot of the things that Americans think they're fundamental rights. And for 16 years I had to. Work with people who fundamentally had different beliefs than my own, and work with them in such a way where you were helping them, but at the same time not completely undermining your own beliefs.
And that is a dance. I can tell you that is a skill that. It can't really be taught unless you're actually working within that environment. You have to live it.
And so I know what that's like to work with people who don't wanna be political, who work who think that their political view is the dominant view and they don't want that threatened. I've learned that I've lived that from the inside out. Now, add into the fact that. My parents were born in World War ii.
My mom was born in 1930. My mom, my dad was born in 1932. My mom was born in Glasgow. My dad was born in Burg, west Germany, so they were on opposite sides of World War II, even though they were children When the wars started, my dad was seven, my mom was nine.
My mom was evacuated up north to Scotland to stay safe from bombing, and my dad. Lived through the Nazi regime. I don't talk about that a lot because people fundamentally don't understand what that's like. I never knew my grandparents.
I met my grandparents once when I was seven. I don't speak German. I don't know a lot of the history. My dad doesn't like to talk about his childhood.
He's not a Nazi. He lived in Germany, so he was one of the millions of regular Germans who learned how to survive in an environment where you don't agree with the politics. Now, I don't know the full story, I gotta tell you, I don't fundamentally I don't agree with fascism. I have always been exposed to history.
That's actually why my minor in university was history, because from the very, my very earliest memories, I remember debating World War II from both perspectives, right? And again, it's not that my dad ever believed in the Nazi cause, but he lived through it, right? How do you survive something like that? Especially as like in that family, they had six kids, so what are you risking if you don't comply?
It's a very delicate thing. And then of course, what it is to be German after the war when you were on the losing side and the comp, the country is paying. Penalties worldwide. Not just in, financial cause, but also in reputation and what it is to be German.
It's been an interesting education and that's actually having that ability to see both sides of that allows me to navigate politics in a way that not necessarily a lot of other people do. And I wanted to say that it is not a bad thing to be political because what you are doing is advocating for the type of life that you want to live now and in the future. And if what you're seeing doesn't represent the future that you want, it behooves you to get comfortable with speaking up.
Now, should you do this in such a way where you're not constantly debating. Political beliefs on online with random strangers who have no idea who they are. Yeah I don't think you should do that. It's not productive.
You're not gonna shift their beliefs. How do you show up in a way that's going to have the most impact and make the most change to help you create the type of future that you want for your life and your work? That's really what my goal is personally. And so I thought that was important to do a podcast about because politics are not inherently bad.
They have a bad connotation, and the loudest voices, the people who are. You benefit from making politics uncomfortable. Those are the people that you wanna watch for because debate and discourse have are a fundamental human. And if you go back thousands of years of human history, debating and discourse is at the heart of what it is to negotiate and navigate life.
And so the people who are allowed and basically tell you that you shouldn't be political and you shouldn't express your opinions and you should play it safe. Those are the people who benefit from silence and silence. Nature does not like a vacuum. Neither does power.
They will fill it with what that is that you want. They want to hear, do you benefit from silence? How does that actually help you create the impact that you feel you need to have to create the life and the work that you want? And I personally don't feel that silence.
It benefits me. So thank you for listening. I'd love to hear your thoughts. Rules of engagement are respect and concrete facts and polite discourse.
If you care to comment, I'm more than willing to hear your comment. I will not tolerate trolling, abuse, shame, anything like that because I've been very clear in terms of what my views are and what my goals are. And if your comments don't help me achieve those you're entitled to what you believe, but at the same time, I don't have to amplify your reach. So that's the way it works on my.
Social accounts, which includes a podcast. Anyways, thanks. Love to hear from you and have a great day. Find yourself in.
Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.