The B2B Podcast Index
Index
All categories
MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
MethodologySubmit
Best of:MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
An independent project byFame
All showsSearchBest episodesGuestsInsightsMethodologySubmit a podcast
Index/Leadership/Happier At Work
Happier At Work artwork

327: Can I trust you? How to Build Trust at Work

Happier At Work · 2026-10-30 · 17 min

0:00--:--

Key moments - from our scoring

Substance score

27 / 100

Five dimensions, 20 points each

Insight Density8 / 20
Originality6 / 20
Guest Caliber3 / 20
Specificity & Evidence6 / 20
Conversational Craft4 / 20

Trust at work operates differently than many leaders assume. Rather than asking people to trust you, Aoife O'Brien examines the Meyer, Shorman, and Davis model of trust, which comprises three interconnected elements: ability (can you actually do this?), benevolence (do you have my best interests at heart?), and integrity (do your actions match your words?). The episode goes beyond generic advice by exploring how trust is built incrementally - like deposits into a trust bank - through consistent demonstration of these three factors, and how easily trust erodes through a single act of broken commitment or misaligned standards. Using concrete examples from her corporate experience, O'Brien illustrates how sharing information can be weaponized against you, how repeated missed deadlines signal capability issues, and how leaders holding others to standards they don't apply to themselves (like return-to-office mandates managers don't follow) directly damage trust. The episode also addresses the silent erosion of trust - team members won't tell you they don't trust you directly, but instead will double-check your work, create backup plans, require written confirmation, and stop relying on your commitments, all of which drains organizational energy and productivity.

Key takeaways

  • →Trust is built on three foundations - ability (competence), benevolence (good intentions toward others), and integrity (alignment between words and actions) - and all three must be present for genuine trust to develop.
  • →Team members who don't trust you won't tell you directly; instead they'll double-check work, create backup plans, seek written confirmation, and avoid relying on your commitments, consuming significant organizational energy.
  • →Repeated missed deadlines, lower-than-promised quality, or one-off broken commitments damage trust specifically in the ability dimension and erode the 'trust bank' you've built over time.
  • →Holding your team to standards you don't apply to yourself - whether it's office attendance, deadlines, or consistency - is a direct integrity violation that rapidly destroys trust at an individual level.
  • →Trust repair is harder when integrity is compromised than when ability falls short, because integrity questions linger in people's minds about whether that person is fundamentally dishonest or unreliable.

About Happier At Work

Hosted by Aoife O'Brien. The show scores 38.5/100 on substance across its analysed episodes. See the full show profile.

Topics in this episode

Psychological safetyReturn-to-office mandatesTrust bank modelMeyer, Shorman, and Davis trust modelAbility (capability and competence)Benevolence (good intentions and care)Integrity (alignment of words and actions)Thriving Talent ModelBackup planning behaviorSelf-interest versus collective good

Questions this episode answers

What are the three dimensions of trust at work?

The Meyer, Shorman, and Davis model identifies ability (can you do the job?), benevolence (do you have my best interests at heart?), and integrity (do your actions match your words?) as the three components of trust.

How do you know if your team doesn't trust you?

Team members won't usually tell you directly, but instead will show signs like double-checking your work, creating backup plans, requiring written confirmation, and stopping reliance on your promises.

Why is integrity harder to repair than ability when trust is broken?

When integrity is compromised, people question whether you are fundamentally dishonest or unreliable, and that doubt lingers in their minds even after attempts to make amends.

How does benevolence differ from being nice at work?

Benevolence is about whether you have the other person's interests at heart when your interests diverge, particularly whether you protect yourself at their expense or use information they share in confidence against them.

What happens to team productivity when trust erodes?

People spend enormous energy double-checking work, creating workarounds, maintaining backup plans, and avoiding reliance on your commitments - all consuming time and energy that could go to productive work.

What our scoring noted

Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.

Insight Density

8 / 20

The episode correctly distinguishes trust from psychological safety and unpacks the ability/benevolence/integrity model with some practical application, but it is padded with personal anecdotes of limited analytical value and the core observations (do what you say, don't hold others to standards you ignore) are not novel for most B2B operators.

What people don't see are your intentions, and that's often how we judge ourselves is by our intentions. What other people see are the behaviors that we demonstrate to them, and they judge us by the behaviors.
They'll check whatever they've asked you to do. They'll have to check it and maybe double-check it. They stop relying on the promises that you made them.

Originality

6 / 20

The episode leans almost entirely on a named academic model and the well-worn 'trust bank' metaphor; there is no contrarian framing, no first-principles reasoning, and no counterintuitive claim that challenges conventional leadership thinking on trust.

it's so easy to keep putting into the trust bank
It's a model from Meyer, Shorman, and Davis, and it talks about three specific things that are related to trust, and those three things are ability, benevolence, and integrity.

Guest Caliber

3 / 20

This is a solo-host monologue with no guest; the host is a generalist leadership consultant and podcaster drawing on personal anecdotes rather than demonstrated large-scale operational experience, so there is no external practitioner expertise to evaluate.

This is the Happier at Work podcast. I'm your host, Aoife O'Brien, and today's episode is about trust

Specificity & Evidence

6 / 20

The one named framework (Meyer, Shorman, and Davis) adds some credibility, and the UK headcount anecdote provides a concrete workplace scenario, but there are no metrics, no company names, no timelines, and no data points that would help a B2B operator calibrate or act with precision.

I was running a pretty lean team and I was looking to get additional headcount within the team because I thought we were running on quite a low headcount compared to, and this is where I made a grave error, compared to the UK team.
It's a model from Meyer, Shorman, and Davis

Conversational Craft

4 / 20

As a solo monologue, there is no host-guest dynamic, no follow-up questioning, and no opportunity for productive disagreement; the rhetorical questions posed to the listener are generic and do not substitute for genuine conversational depth or intellectual pressure.

So, turning this question back on you, when you think about trust, are you someone who by default naturally trusts other people, or do you naturally wait until they've given you a reason for them to trust you?
I would love to know, as always, what you think of today's episode. Has it given you food for thought?

Conversation analysis

Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.

Most-used words

trust56aoife17brien15team11today9back9episode8interests7heart7example7idea7intentions6starting5default5necessarily5best5

Episode notes

How do you build trust at work, and what behaviours might be quietly eroding it? In this solo episode of the Happier at Work podcast, Aoife O'Brien explores the foundations of trust in the workplace and why trust between individuals deserves more attention. She distinguishes trust from psychological safety and examines how people’s different starting points, experiences, and expectations shape the way they decide whether someone is trustworthy. In This Episode, You’ll Discover: Why people have different default levels of trust. The three foundations of workplace trust: ability, benevolence, and integrity. How capability and context influence whether someone can be trusted to deliver. Why good intentions aren’t enough if your behaviour doesn’t demonstrate care for others. Related Topics Covered: Capabilities, Personal Development, Relationships at Work

Full transcript

17 min

Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.

Aoife O'Brien : How do you feel when someone says, trust me? Is it something that makes you feel a bit cringe? Is it something that makes you feel like, why do they need to tell me to trust them? Is it something that makes you think, Actually, I trust them less because they're asking me to trust them.

This is the Happier at Work podcast. I'm your host, Aoife O'Brien, and today's episode is about trust and specifically not at the general leadership, not at the organizational level, but really trust at that individual level. I know I talk a lot about psychological safety. It's the foundation of the Thriving Talent Model.

Trust and psychological safety are related, but they're not exactly the same thing. And so for today's episode, I'm focusing on trust mostly because I've spoken at quite a number of leadership conferences recently, and this is something that keeps coming up a lot again and again. Can I trust you? And so I want to talk about that in today's episode.

Aoife O'Brien : To begin with, it's really important to know the starting point. So where are we actually coming from? And for me, I tend to trust people by default. I will trust someone, but I know that not everyone is like that.

And when I was doing the research for today's episode, I, it also made me realize that maybe I don't trust people in the way that I think I do. Because maybe I trust them if they have a history of competence or capability, or if they have a work history that makes me think they are a capable person, then I will by default trust them, but not necessarily, not always. But then there are other parts to trust, like, do you have my best interests at heart? And maybe I don't necessarily by default trust that someone has my best interests at heart until I see evidence that they do.

And so all of that to say that we, we as individuals may be starting from different starting positions. Some people may have a higher propensity to trust other people when other people are starting from a lower propensity to trust and their default mode is, I'm not going to trust this person until they've given me evidence the otherwise, you know, until they've given me evidence to the contrary that I can trust them, that I can believe in them. Aoife O'Brien : So, turning this question back on you, when you think about trust, are you someone who by default naturally trusts other people, or do you naturally wait until they've given you a reason for them to trust you?

And when we're thinking about trust, what evidence does someone need to show you To demonstrate that they deserve your trust, there are quite a few models around trust, and I think this particular one that I'm going to share today is important for what I'm going to cover in today's episode. It's a model from Meyer, Shorman, and Davis, and it talks about three specific things that are related to trust, and those three things are ability, benevolence, and integrity. Ability answers the question: Can you?

Actually do it? Are you capable? Do you have the knowledge? Do you have the skills?

Do you have the experience to do something? Do you have the judgment that is required to execute on something? And going back to that earlier point, you may trust that someone has your best intentions at heart, but maybe you don't trust them to do this specific task. And I think, again, this can be context dependent.

So, someone who has an amazing amount of experience as an accountant, if they start in the marketing team, just because they have a whole load of work experience doesn't mean that they're going to excel in marketing or that they're going to pick it up really quickly. So I think again, it's context dependent whether you trust someone is going to deliver what they say they're going to deliver. I think the nuance around the frustr - well, for me personally anyway, the frustration when someone says they'll do something And doesn't, and I think absolutely fine if it's a once-off.

If it very rarely happens, that is absolutely fine. Aoife O'Brien : It's understandable if a deadline needs to get pushed again. If it's a you know, I'm happy to make a reasonable accommodation for someone if they need an extended amount of time, so long as that communication happens. But I think if there's a repeated pattern where someone is not doing what they said they would do.

Or doing it to a lower standard, then it calls into question their underlying capability to perform the task. And we lose trust. And it's that specific area of trust around the ability, like, can this person actually do this thing? The second area then is about benevolence.

And that is really about the intention behind what someone is doing. So do I believe you have good intentions towards me. Aoife O'Brien : And I'll share a personal example around this in a second. But I also wanted to highlight that in another model of trust, one of the dividing factors, I'm not sure how else to explain it, it's on the bottom of the equation.

So you have the equation on the top, and then below that, it's divided by your self-interest. So are you doing it because it's going to benefit you? Or is it benefiting the wider good? So how can I trust that you have my intentions and not just being really self-centered, essentially?

And this is not about being nice. It's about the consideration for the other person. So if our interests diverge, for example, if we're maybe on competing teams, are you going to have your own interests at heart, or are you going to look at the bigger picture, the wider business, or are we now competitors, essentially? Competing for the same resources.

If I give you information, what will you do with that information? Will you share information that I thought was protected in some way that I shared in confidence? Do you have any regard about what happens to me? So this ties in with this idea of care, and I talk about care in the context of psychological safety quite a lot.

And how about, will you protect yourself at my expense? So, This to me ties in with the idea of, am I just going to get thrown under the bus when it comes to, you know, handing out blame or whatever it might be that I, I don't trust you not to throw me under the bus. Aoife O'Brien : I do have an example of this. It kind of loosely ties in with this idea, but back in my corporate days, I was running a pretty lean team and I was looking to get additional headcount within the team because I thought we were running on quite a low headcount compared to, and this is where I made a grave error, compared to the UK team.

And so I went and I pitched and I followed the procedures and I thought I made a pretty good pitch, but that information that I shared was then taken and used against me. And the UK leadership team went back to the UK team, shared what I had shared, but obviously out of context, and said that the UK team needed to work more like the Irish team. And so they used that rather than as a way to give me more headcount, as a way to encourage the UK team to be more productive or to reduce their headcount.

So it turned back on me and you can imagine the next time I was asked to contribute something along those lines, I was very reluctant. This ties in slightly with the idea of psychological safety, but this was really a kind of a one-on-one and do you have my best interests at heart or are you just trying to protect yourself and the margin and the bottom line? And that's kind of how it ended up. The third one then is about integrity.

Aoife O'Brien : Do your actions match your words? So do you do what you say you will do? Do your commitments actually mean something? Do you hold yourself to the same standards that you hold other people?

And I'll come back to this point in a second because I have a great example to share on that. Are you consistent when circumstances change? Do you behave according to the values that you say are important? So this example that I have, it is more of a personal example, But, and again, you know, it's going back years, but it's something I still remember.

I had an arrangement to meet up with someone and this other person was very clear and explicit. Do not cancel on me. I am going through something really tough right now, and I really need you to be there for me. So, I went out of my way.

I was away for the weekend and I was traveling back quite a distance to be able to come home and to be able to meet up with her. And when I got home, I had a message to say that she had cancelled on me. Aoife O'Brien : And so again, it's this idea of the asymmetry of it, the asymmetry of the expectation, the lack of reciprocity in terms of the agreement. On the one hand, it was not okay for me to cancel on her, but on the other hand, it was perfectly acceptable for her to cancel on me.

And so it causes a wedge. It really caused an issue between what she said or the kinds of standards she held other people to, but she wasn't necessarily holding those standards for herself in how she interacts with other people. And you know, like I say, it's something I still think about to this day, and I want to encourage you to think about how you're showing up and the behaviors that you're showing. And again, if we take those three things together.

And think about how trust is showing up. So trust is not about being a trustworthy person or your intentions behind your actions. Aoife O'Brien : What people don't see are your intentions, and that's often how we judge ourselves is by our intentions. What other people see are the behaviors that we demonstrate to them, and they judge us by the behaviors.

And it's not just They're judging a one-off. They're judging consistently over and over and over how you're showing up. So you know, if you think about it like a bank, the trust bank, and it's so - I was going to say - it's so easy to keep putting into the trust bank. I think if you show up with integrity, if you do what you say you would do, if you have the other person's interests at heart, and if you're capable of doing.

What it is that you're supposed to be doing, you're putting money or trust into the trust bank and you're repeatedly and repeatedly and repeatedly putting it in there. It's so easy to break that if you let someone down, if you don't do what you said you would do, if the quality that you deliver is below the standard that's been agreed, or if you throw them under the bus, if you don't have their best interests at heart. Aoife O'Brien : All of these things contribute to not trusting someone anymore, and it's so easy to let that go.

And I don't want to dwell on the idea of repairing when trust is broken because that's not what today's episode is about. But there are different ways that we can repair with people, and it's not it's not always easy, and it's not always the same. I think it's it's easier to. Make amends with someone or to rebuild that trust when it's more to do with the ability side of things rather than the integrity.

Because with integrity, it'll always be in the back of your mind, is this just the kind of person that this is? Are they just the kind of person who tells lies, for example? Tying in with this idea is that we don't always know Whether people trust us or not. It's not as if someone is gonna come up to me and say, Aoife, I really trust you.

Well, sometimes they do, or they're not necessarily - this is probably less likely to happen, but they won't say, Aoife, I don't trust you. Aoife O'Brien : They're probably less likely to say that directly to your face. But what happens is they'll tell you Less. They'll check whatever they've asked you to do.

They'll have to check it and maybe double-check it. They stop relying on the promises that you made them. Maybe they'll make other plans or have a backup plan. I know certainly with someone that I worked with previously, she let me down on a few things, and so I had backup plans in place so that when it came to the crunch and she did let me down again, I actually had something ready to go, which is a terrible thing to say.

And I think that was just the final straw for me. Aoife O'Brien : I couldn't work like that anymore. Maybe they are seeking confirmation in writing, or they're finding ways to work around you, or they stop challenging you. But imagine the amount of energy that this takes to constantly be checking someone's work or not feeling like you can rely on them, so you have to work around them in some way.

So it takes an enormous amount of energy and you don't necessarily know that it's happening because you don't know that your team doesn't trust you unless there's a mechanism to provide feedback. But again, if they've given that feedback and it hasn't gone anywhere, then that can erode trust as well. So thinking about yourself and your own behaviors and whether your team trusts you or not, and Again, it's going to be hard to know unless they openly tell you that they don't trust you, which is not likely to happen.

I want you to think about the kinds of behaviors that you're demonstrating to grow that trust, to build that trust with them, because like I said, people are starting from different points where some people will automatically trust you and other people, it will take them a while to build up that trust with you. But another important question to ask is to flip it and think, well, what reasons am I giving them to not trust me? Where are you letting things down? Where are you holding them to standards that you don't hold yourself to?

I saw this funny meme. Aoife O'Brien : I know it's just a meme, but I think it kind of captures a lot of what's going on at work right now. And the meme was someone's giant head on a screen and then a group of people sitting around a desk. And it was basically about the manager, when the manager wants everyone to come in To the office, but they're not actually willing to come in themselves.

It's it's again it's a it's a way to erode trust. Like I don't trust that this person holding themselves to the standards that they're holding the rest of us to. So they're expecting things of other people that they're not willing to do themselves, and those kinds of things are going to erode trust. So I would love to know, as always, what you think of today's episode.

Has it given you food for thought? Has it made you think of things in a slightly different way? And is there just one thing that you're going to do differently after today's episode? I'm your host, Aoife O'Brien, and you have been listening or watching the Happier at Work podcast.

Related episodes across the Index

Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.

  • #57: From Pressure to Performance: How Great Leaders Find Their Mojo and Flow, with Ben CroweWorld's Greatest Business Thinkers · on Psychological safety90 / 100
  • Workplace Culture & Psychological Safety | The HR Leadership Blind Spot with Seema BhansaliThe HR L&D Podcast · on Psychological safety86 / 100
  • Your Best Employees are Quitting Quietly - Warning Signs You Can't IgnoreHigh Octane Leadership · on Psychological safety84 / 100
  • Reframing Cyber Risk with Jane Frankland MBEBCG on Compliance · on Psychological safety84 / 100
  • Engagement, Retention, and Employee Career Planning Part 1Informed Decisions · on Psychological safety80 / 100
  • The Superhero Leader Trap: Why Doing More Can Make Your Team Do LessThe Mason Duchatschek Show · on Psychological safety80 / 100

More from Happier At Work

All episodes →
  • 309: Discovering Universal Concerns on a Book Tour Across America!30 / 100
Explore the best B2B Leadership podcasts →
All Happier At Work episodes →