The B2B Podcast Index
Beyond B2B Marketing

Zero-Click Marketing: Rand Fishkin on Attention, Trust, and the Future of B2B Discovery

Beyond B2B Marketing · 2026-06-22 · 1h 10m

Substance score

64 / 100

Five dimensions, 20 points each

Insight Density13 / 20
Originality12 / 20
Guest Caliber15 / 20
Specificity & Evidence14 / 20
Conversational Craft10 / 20

What our scoring noted

Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.

Insight Density

13 / 20

The episode contains several genuinely non-obvious insights—the 1,400-prompt average needed for consistent AI results, SparkToro's doubling of AI visibility with zero measurable sales lift, and Google's AI Mode 0.13% click-through rate being obscured by a 'billion users' framing. However, roughly a third of the runtime is origin stories, video game studio anecdotes, and affirmatory back-and-forth that dilutes the density significantly.

you would have to ask uh these AI tools the same question 1400 times on average, 1400 times to get the same list of brands in the same order. So ranking ranking is just pointless.
YouTube, by the way, hugely undervalued for B2B. So is Reddit. Like when you look at the SparkToro data for any given B2B audience, and then you look at the number of people investing in those places, it's just embarrassing.

Originality

12 / 20

The most original contribution is Fishkin's own first-party data showing SparkToro went from 23% to 61–63% AI visibility with no detectable business impact—a genuinely contrarian data point against the prevailing AI-visibility hype. Other takes (brand > demand, don't be everywhere, AI slop can't rank) are increasingly common in B2B marketing circles.

Has it done anything for our business? Have we gotten any more leads? Have more people come and signed up? No. As best we can tell, it has had no impact whatsoever. We have more than doubled our AI visibility with no impact.
I don't believe that is because Lee Google has, you know, these incredible algorithms that can spot AI. That's not what I think is happening. What I think is happening is Google has very good algorithms for identifying whether human beings pay attention.

Guest Caliber

15 / 20

Fishkin is a genuine practitioner—he founded and scaled Moz, built SparkToro on top of proprietary clickstream panel data, and draws on live operational experience rather than punditry; his AI visibility statistics come from his own product's tracking. He is well into 'career podcast guest' territory which tempers the score, but the substance he brings is real and differentiated.

we published a a study on SparToro, and we don't compete with this company. I don't do anything with AI tracking, but I just found it to be such BS.
SparkToro was visible in audience research, you know, prompts across Chat GPT and Claude and Google AI mode, uh like 20% of the time, 23% of the time. Now we're in the 60s, 61, 62, 63%.

Specificity & Evidence

14 / 20

The episode is notably rich in specific numbers and named entities: the 1,400-prompt consistency threshold, 0.13% AI Mode click rate, SparkToro's 23%→63% visibility arc, Profound.com named and its Andreessen Horowitz backing called out, Datos as the clickstream provider, the $2.15M Snack Bar raise, and the DOJ trial engineer testimony on click/bounce signals as top ranking factor. Minor deductions for some statistics (e.g. the 83%/17x influencer figures) being cited without published methodology visible in the transcript.

when Google says AI mode reached a million users in a month... That number is super, super tiny. Now, granted, super tiny means like 0.13%
we raised two, two point one five million dollars

Conversational Craft

10 / 20

The host opens with excessive flattery and several questions are broad or leading rather than probing; there is no meaningful pushback or productive disagreement across 70 minutes. Lee partially compensates by contributing his own research data (always-on influencer program stats, agency inquiry close-rate data), which elevates the exchange above a pure PR softball session, but the craft ceiling is low.

He's not only the best answer for all things search and audience intelligence, but also as an entrepreneur and founder of multiple companies in the Martech space
83% our research found of uh B2B companies that are implementing influencer marketing in an always-on fashion are rate their programs as being extremely successful

Conversation analysis

Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the verbal tics along the way.

Filler words

like252you know169so130right127um88uh68sort of30kind of21actually12I mean7basically7anyway3obviously2er1

Episode notes

Search is changing faster than most B2B marketers realize. AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Reddit, YouTube, influencers, podcasts, and social platforms are fragmenting how buyers discover information and evaluate solutions. At the same time, traditional metrics like rankings, traffic, and even clicks are becoming less reliable indicators of marketing impact. In this episode of the Beyond B2B Marketing podcast, host Lee Odden sits down with Rand Fishkin, founder of SparkToro, co-founder of Moz, and co-author with Amanda Natividad of Zero Click Marketing , to discuss what marketing looks like when discovery happens without a website visit. Rand shares insights from his latest research on search fragmentation, audience behavior, AI search, and why marketers need to rethink long-held assumptions about attribution, content, and visibility. The conversation explores why traffic is becoming a less meaningful KPI, how marketers can identify where buyers are actually paying attention, and why brand building may be more important than ever.

Full transcript

1h 10m

Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.

Hello, and welcome to the Beyond B2B Marketing Podcast. I'm your host, Lee Oden, CEO of Top Rank Marketing. And today, our guest is someone who has a depth of expertise, intellect, and charisma that few others in the marketing space can match. He's not only the best answer for all things search and audience intelligence, but also as an entrepreneur and founder of multiple companies in the Martech space, including Moz, SparkToro, Alert Mouse, and Beyond with Snack Bar Studio. Of course. I'm talking about the one and only Rand Fishkin. Welcome to the show, Rand. Thanks for having me. All right. Well, it's good to see you. It's been a long time, many, many years, but um, you know, this is one of the great things about this podcast. I get to reconnect with people I haven't seen in a while. Um, let's it appears that we have very similar bookshelf stylings. So I'm really I really think we were meant to be together for this. Meant to be. if I change my camera, you can see my my things, my accoutrements of uh yes, yes. Um, it's meant to be. So you've been in the space for a long time, and I want to kick things off with a a tradition we have on the show, and that is to ask folks about their marketing origin story. And I remember I don't if you remember this or not, but I remember first hearing about you in a post on a SES search engine strategies forum where you were letting people know that you'll be wearing yellow shoes when you come to this conference or something like that. I don't know if you remember that or not. But of course, a million things have happened since then in your career and your journey and the impact you've had on the industry. But I'm I'm really curious if we go back to the start, what how what got you into marketing in the first place? Yeah. So uh my my mom, Gillian, right, who is my co-founder on Moz, she had been doing sort of classic, you know, old school 20th century marketing consultancy for small local businesses in Seattle, like design your logo and make your letterhead and uh your business cards, all that kind of stuff. And that uh led her to needing Someone to make websites for her clients in the late 1990s. And she brought home a copy of um Microsoft front page, if you remember that software. And so yeah, I was like, man, this is great. I can, I can make things on the internet. You know, I had been using BBS's bulletin board systems in like early, early nineties to play video games with friends and that kind of stuff. And yeah, just kind of fell in love with building stuff for the internet. Then we started, you know. Doing web design for folks, which did not go well, tons of competition. I was not a good web designer, dot com crash, all that kind of stuff. And so found ourselves deep in debt uh in the like 2002, three, four era. And that's when I started this this blog, SEO Moz, which was because I had to learn SEO so that I could do that work for our clients. And that ended up being something I was really good at. So Yeah, just sort of um I think I think the thing that got me really good at it, Lee, was probably something that drove a lot of people back in those days, which is that frustration with Google, like just anger, not just Google, but all the search engines for keeping their algorithms hidden and secret and trying to like do this security through obscurity baloney. It drove me bananas that You know, someone at Google could say, Hey, this doesn't work, stop doing it. Hey, this does work, keep doing it. And then people would test. And if they were truthful, like the industry would know and we would all do those things. But instead, you got this like, Yeah, yeah, it was so, my God, it was so this black box. And so, yeah, the reason the reason I chose the name Moz is because, you know, the Mozilla Foundation and D Moz and MapMoz and Chef Chef Moz, there was all these like, Let's make this information open source movement around that naming convention. So I was like, I should do that for SEO. And yeah, ended up working out. You know, there's it's interesting. There's a interesting parallel, a little just a little bit. Uh, front page was also my entree into learning about websites. I was selling websites over the phone, can you believe it? Uh, in '97. And my supervisor had front page in his office. So I'd sneak in there and try to teach myself how to make these sites. And people asked, How how do we get traffic to these sites that you're selling us? And that that's kind of how I Got into that and was no good at web design myself either. So anyway, um, here we are. And and and so I'm you've got big news, um, fairly recent news, right? Congratulations, a huge congratulations on Zero Click Marketing with Amanda Natividad. and I'm super excited. There's so much that aligns with um, you know, fighting the good fight of of of how marketing can be done. And um I love that. And I can't wait to get my copy. and but I'd love to ask you about it. Like so so so you know, recognizing the fact that you've launched this new book and I'm kind of curious, with any book, you have an audience in mind, right? What's the audience you have in mind? Who's gonna benefit the most from zero click marketing? is is really a book for uh marketers and and sort of the secondary audiences, creators and founders. But marketers first, and the and the reason that we feel like marketers need it is not so much because this is not stuff that you could if you if you sort of paid close attention and you know went down the rabbit holes of all the um blog posts and social posts and stuff on the internet that you that you couldn't find a lot of this information. You could. But assembled all in one place and especially with the narrative and the firepower to make the case to your boss or your team or your client, you know, so you can just pull out the book and be like, Hey, look. Traffic as a KPI is broken. Like it's just, it just is not going to work as a key performance indicator. Is it indicative of some things? Maybe. Is it something that we should focus our efforts on? No. Traffic can go down and sales can go up. And like, let me tell you these stories from the book. Let me share with you these case studies and let me show you how to build this correlation dashboard so that we can measure things. We're not saying marketing is unmeasurable. We're not completely going back, you know, 200 years, but. those those frameworks and processes and stories and tactics and strategies, they they needed to be all in one place. And that's what the that is what the book does. Well, I I can't wait for us to to do a review once uh once I get my hands on a copy. Um I'd be happy to do so. Yeah. it's you're gonna get that like oh the the vibe is not it is not traditional business book. It is not it is not boring. Like Amanda and my voices are really in there. You it sounds nothing like AI, like it isn't it is it is not a professional, you know, sort of book. It is uh hey, does this seem like BS to you? Seems like BS to us too. Here's how to do this instead. It's like a conversation. It sounds like a conversation in print, you know? There we go. Well, fantastic. Well, looking forward to it. So, you know, you lean in quite a bit into research and edit analysis and interpretation, and there are stories that come out of that. Um, and there's some research you had done um where I th one of the conclusions was this idea of influence happens everywhere. And I think that does a great job of showing how fragmented discovery or search. Has has become because people aren't limited to just going to Google or even just to ChatGPT or something like that. And in the B2B space, a lot of marketers are defaulting to LinkedIn. Um, they linked in LinkedIn and Google, especially because that's what's familiar to them. And I'm wondering from your perspective, how how do you think that B2B marketers should go about figuring out where their customers are actually? discovering and consuming and acting on information. Yeah, I mean, hmm, so obviously this is the premise behind SparkToro, right? Is that find where your audience pays attention. Um, but that being said, SparkToro is not the only way to do this. Uh I think historically, the methodologies available to us were surveys and interviews, uh, and clickstream data. And and clickstream data is wonderful. It's amazing. That's what we built SparkToro on top of, right? Like the the underpinnings of the software is A big clickstream panel, which is basically like you know, millions of devices and every URL that they visit, uh anonymized and aggregated, and then sort of sold to data brokers and assembled by folks like Datos, who's our provider, or similar web, which most folks who are listening had probably heard of, or Comscore or Nielsen, right? And that data, that data source, what's so valuable about it is whereas surveys and interviews You know, you can ask people and they will give you answers about, hey, um, you know, I I really pay attention to this person on Instagram or like I watch these YouTube videos. YouTube, by the way, hugely undervalued for B2B. So is Reddit. Like when you look at the SparkToro data for any given B2B audience, and then you look at the number of people investing in those places, it's just embarrassing. Like, I I get that LinkedIn is big, it should be big. I'm not telling you to take that off your radar, it's just these other two are really ignored. But so these folks would might say, right? Like this through the surveys and interviews, they might say what they're paying attention to, but nobody has this perfect recollection of like, yeah, I this was my buyer journey. I visited all these things, right? Like if, you know, if I ask you, like, how'd you choose your speakers for your computer? You'd be like, oh, well, I think it was recommended by this person. I did some Googling. I checked out a subreddit, and then I went to Amazon and like I, you whatever, shopped around. But you might forget that, like, yeah, I visited this blog. that's right. And there was this YouTube video I watched. And man, you know, I totally forgot that uh this thing popped up on social on my Instagram feed because Meta knows right what you're searching for. And so it like sees that and then puts that in your feed. And so this is where clickstream data is really valuable, right? It tells you what the journey looks like in aggregate for hundreds or thousands or millions of people. Sure. And and I think there's a lot to be said. You know, even the, you know, the you've heard of the expression subliminal advertising way back in the day when I mean that's algorithmic now, right? In terms of how things information is surfaced to people in sequence across uh across websites and and so forth. But in a B2B space, I think there are these layers that, you know, you have click stream data and you have qualitative data. Um, and you can reconcile those things in interesting ways, right? Um it used to be one of the best things used to be search keyword data. And that's that's not completely gone, right? It's it's still valuable and interesting. But you know, that there's that huge frustration. Like when you and I were coming up in the industry Lee, we could look at like, this person landed on our, you know, speaker page and they ended up converting. but but let's go back in time, you know, six months and look at the 12 visits that they made to our website, our blog, our email newsletter, this article, this case study. They watched this video on our site. Where did they come from all those visits? they came from this social channel and then this YouTube and this, you know, Google search query. And you could just map this all together and build this like really beautiful model of a nearly complete buyer journey. It was it was missing things like it always was. Perfect attribution never existed. But 2015 man, you could you could put it together very reasonably um and sort of you know put your budget against it and believe in it. And then we convinced like everyone I say we, it wasn't just you and I, but but you know, we we we were big contributors, right? And like stood on stages, wrote blog posts, like contributed all this content that basically told execs and CFOs and CEOs and boards of directors and investors that they could rely on this information, right? That they could they that this was the way to build an attributable marketing practice. And then, you know, then the rug got pulled out from under all of us. Yeah, it sure it certainly did. you know, and and you think about with that fragmentation of the buyer journey, meaning in terms of where is it that are they really uh experiencing things? Um even big companies have finite res resources, you know, uh in terms of okay, well, wow, it's not two or three, and I'm simplifying clearly, but it's not two or three channels that are primaries, but my goodness, it's ten or twelve or something to that effect. How do we prioritize? Do you have any advice? Yeah. Uh look, I think if you're if you're a big company with a big budget or a big agency with a lot of firepower behind you and a bunch of client budget, you can invest in a lot of channels and do well. Right. You can basically be like, hey, these are the twelve channels. Here's our, you know, strategy for each of these. Here's our team for each of these. You know, whatever. The um community team is gonna take Instagram and TikTok or the the video social team and then the You text social team, they're gonna take threads and Twitter and Blue Sky, and then we're gonna have the LinkedIn team, we're gonna have the Facebook team, we're gonna have the Google team, we're gonna have the you know, Google's also responsible for Bing, and then we're gonna have an AI SEO team. Fine, totally fine. But if you're talking about small shops, right? Solo businesses, independent operators, um my my advice is pick one or two, maybe three channels that you're really good at. That you you are not just good at, but you find passion and interest from participating in those places. Like if you log into LinkedIn and you're like, God, it just kills me to have to do this. I hate scrolling. I hate all the tech bros in my feed. I can't stand the like, you know, whatever fake business talk of all this stuff. Fine. LinkedIn is probably not for you, right? Like, I don't, you're not gonna be great at something you hate doing. So don't do it. Maybe you love YouTube. Maybe you're like, gosh, I watch a ton of YouTube videos. I get the hooks. I understand how to sort of build, you know, uh addiction there. And like I get how to get people to subscribe. And I take my sh my videos and I cut them up into a bunch of short form stuff. And I do really well on you know, whatever, on YouTube shorts, and like I'm good at getting my videos ranked and I'm good at keyword research for my video. Great, man. Like YouTube might be your channel. And it doesn't matter, especially if you are a niche player. It does not matter, right? If you're trying to build a five to 10, even a $25 million business. You don't have to worry about like, hey, you know, most of my audience is here and some of them are here, some of them are here. You can pick the fifth most popular channel and do great because the world is big and there are a lot of consumers and a lot of businesses. You you don't have to be everywhere. I I fully disagree with the like Gary Vaynerchuk approach to, you know, you got to be everywhere and post everything everywhere. And pick one or two channels, rock it. Well, especially especially with, you know, situations like you can have be on LinkedIn, let's say, and you can have a hundred thousand followers on LinkedIn or more. And someone with 5,000 followers can get a lot more engagement than you according to the post, the way the LinkedIn algorithm works now, right? So that levels the playing field in a certain way. And or in the case of AI search, haven't you found that You you could be a brand new website, six months old, and be ingested and and discovered and in and surfaced. So there's opportunities for what might been previously characterized as resource constrained marketers if you know where to go, right? And agree. Yeah, there's this, we write about this in the book, but there's this um what we ended up calling the TikTokification of social media, which is essentially, you know, like TikTok's big innovation, right? Back in um, this is like, you know, mid-2010s, right? But but when TikTok came out, the thing that they did different from Facebook and Instagram and and Twitter and LinkedIn, like all the rest at the time, which has now been adopted by everyone, is rather than Show you content primarily from people you follow. They showed you content that addicted you. Right. So essentially, as you would scroll in your, you know, you would scroll in your TikTok feed, right? And it would record how long did this person watch this video? If they watch this video, what's the likelihood that they watch the next video? If they watch this video, what's the likelihood that they came back to the app quickly? Right. Like they maybe they close it for five minutes, but then they return to the app rapidly. And so that uh addiction engagement measurement that had nothing to do with following, right? And what you what you proactively told TikTok, like you might tell TikTok, I, you know what, I really do not want to see um, you know, stupid comedy short form videos that are just whatever, sort of, you know, funny slop that's meaningless. You could tell TikTok that, but if it saw that you were watching more and more, it would be like, I don't care what you say, right? Like I'm gonna show it to you. And and almost every platform has adopted that approach. Like, I I don't know if you've been how much you time you spend on Reddit, Lee, but like they completely adopted that approach a couple of years ago, where you tell them, hey, I these are the subreddits I want to subscribe to, and they're like, Shh, no, no, we see that you keep scrolling and you keep engaging and you keep clicking, you know, tapping when when we show you the. Content from these subreddits. And so that TikTokification has meant, yes, it's created a lot of opportunity for people who get the hooks and like can can sort of play the social game in a very in a way that's a little bit more um frustrating for a lot of folks, but also opens up opportunity if you if you get it, right? Yeah, it's like that adage, don't listen to what people say, watch what they do. And so there's this behavioral optimization for keeping people on platform, right? And but we can use that if we we recognize that we see that and we can use that, right? Um, to optimize our own efforts. this is this is something it's it's even made its way into Google in a small way, right? Like you can see that what um what Google has been doing with with all their kinds of instant answers, um, and AI overviews and sort of you know, all the widgets and all that kind stuff is essentially to look for opportunities where searchers will perform more searches if they answer the query quickly and efficiently right inside the interface. And so you can watch, you know, in the Clickstream data, for example, that the datos data search reports that we publish with them, you can see that as Google has like adopted this huge number of instant answers, they've been able to raise the number of searches per searcher per month. And that is how they are compensating for the fact that zero click search is up so high. They're essentially like, hey, you know what? It's okay if people don't click on anything because they're gonna search again, search again, search again. And at the end of the funnel, at the end of that like, you know, whatever buyer journey or discovery journey, then we know they'll finally convert onto something at rates that were similar or greater than before. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So yeah. And you know, a lot of this a lot of this kind of rolls back to, you know, kind of a long standing debate, I guess, in terms of, you know, I've asked about prioritization and asked, you know, w how things are changing in terms of how people find information and interact with it. Well, in in the B2B space, especially, um, there's a long standing debate around uh brand where should you allocate your resources? Brand. or demand. And I think this is a relevant conversation as it relates to zero click, right? As I'm sure you can relate. And and but on top of this, there's there are these predictions about the death of the MQL, right? Because people don't want to gate content anymore. Uh, not only because buyers don't want to fill out a form, but also they can then use that information to hopefully be ingested by uh LLMs and increase their AI search visibility. So here's the question. If companies aren't capturing names for nurturers, right? And clicks are going away. Um, w how can they can brand do deliver on the promise, I guess? You know, can brand investment, brand focus can it deliver on the thing that marketing is being held accountable to? so I I would say a couple of things here. One, if you look at the history of companies that have outperformed their competitors, you will see on an almost universal focus on brand over demand, right? So that it's very frustrating for someone Okay, I admit it. No, it's just it's frustrating for someone like me, right? Because I spent my whole career, especially at Moz, right? I spent my whole career being like, demand, demand, demand, right? Rank for keywords, right? But you know, every every marketing problem to me was, yeah, well, what are they searching for? Let's rank number one. So, you know, that um it's it sort of kills me that what actually worked was Super Bowl ads and like TV, radio, outdoor, you know, right? That kind of that kind of stuff. And and the sort of you know brand building practices of of the product of the brand and the positioning and all that kind of stuff. But I'm gonna say I don't think I don't think you should kill gated content entirely in B2B. I don't think you should completely give up on this concept of MQLs. Um I think there's a time and a place for it. I think that it is okay to summarize some of your, you know, uh most social media engagement friendly content from the report you produce, the case study, the um, you know, the research, the the data, that that that one spicy chart. Absolutely, absolutely that should be everywhere. It should be ungated. Is it okay to draw people, right, to say like, hey, this amazing chart, like there's a whole bunch more. And you will find that Link in the comments. Or if you search for this, you know, you know, you can find the report. And for the I think it is also okay, and we have to get to a place where um businesses are more comfortable with this, especially the execs who who sort of are forcing the marketer to make these investments and measuring it, you've got to get okay with the idea that your reach is now gonna be far greater than it was, but your traffic is gonna wait be way lower. So if Know if we go back in time 10 years and you did this MQL focused, gated content, research report, whatever, put it out across all your channels, and maybe you got like you know 10,000 people seeing it and 1200 people filling out the form and downloading it, and that turned into 10 new customers. Well, today you might be able to share the best parts of that and reach. 30,000 or 40,000 people, but maybe only 200 will fill out the form. So way, way down. And then you'll only get maybe 12 or 15 new customers. That's 20% customer growth. That's 50% customer growth, right? Like the the problem is measuring things based on traffic instead of hey, when we went wide and we reached all the people who were potentially interested in this and we drove them. To this thing, only the most qualified, most interested filled it out instead of a far greater sum that would have five, 10, 15 years ago. Let's let's take the win, right? Take the win where the win exists, which is at the conversion level and at the reach level. And forget this sort of middle layer of measuring traffic or form fills. Well that's a that's a really great point because the math of it has changed a little bit. And the other dynamic that's changed in B2B is that buying committees have gone from three, four, five people to thirteen. And then you have these people outside, you know, so so you know, we've companies are having to think about not just the folks who are the stakeholders looking to buy a thing, but also they've got to get finance on board. They've got to get HR or legal on board and IT and da da da. There's the larger number of people, not just the more stakeholders on top of those secondary layer of uh influencers on the buying decision to have to deal with. And they're not all searching for the same thing. They're not all looking for the same thing. So it's an interesting situation, but totally solvable. People are looking for can I have my cake and eat it too in terms of gating, not gating? And I and you know, something that we started, we've published about six or seven research reports in the last five, six years. And uh a couple of years ago, we started. ungating the full report and we publish it as a lightly interactive asset. But if you want the PDF, then you give up a name, you give us an email address so we know where to send it kind of a thing. And that is done really, really well. We're trying to create frictionless sharing and as maximum as what you're saying, maximum exposure to the ideas, because we're not trying to hold those back. But if someone wants, you know, a format, you know, a traditional format like a PDF or something. Or in our case, we would complement the research report with a playbook. If you want the playbook, yeah, well then you go ahead and, you know, share something with that because we've got some extra special information to share that will be useful to you. I I love two things about what you're saying. One is the intent piece, right? Which is like, hey, let's get the information. Information is no longer the asset that it wants or the the product. Information is it's not a commodity, but it is a it's part of the marketing funnel, right? It's part of the marketing process. And it has to live in all these places where people pay attention because they're just not gonna come to your website the way they used to and do everything there. So I love that. The second piece that I like listeners, if you heard Lee say something wild, I heard it too. And that is over the last do you say five years we published six or seven pieces? Research reports, yeah. Yep. Original research. that sounds like so few, so few, but it completely works. You don't need this like daily or weekly publishing cycle. You don't even need a monthly publishing cycle. You can be incredibly successful with something you publish once a year, twice a year. And I I don't want folks to gloss over that when they when they hear you telling the story. Well, the thing is, is that one research report fuels content for six months because of the way it's architected. You know, we follow our own medicine in terms of including industry experts in the research. They help us ideate questions. They are contributing expertise for the report itself, and then they become podcast guests or comp you know, co co-creators and other derivative assets that are published two or three months after the report drops. Point is is that one research report, as you know, and people I'm sure watching or listening can realize that can be a great source of information um and fuel all kinds of really great content experiences in the future, especially if you're creative about formats, you know, interactive content videos, whatever. Yeah. what does Ross Simmons always say? Create once, distribute forever. And you know, it that philosophy is just so so darn effective. I think that um to be honest, like the it's a lesson that that frankly I could take from what y'all are doing because I I have this I have this constant need, you know, every few weeks to like make something new, make put out more research. and and that addiction is it's it's probably not the healthiest thing. But I think people look at at my work sometimes and they're like, I have to be like Rand. I have to be pumping out crazy amounts of content and LinkedIn videos and research analyses and all this kind of stuff. And you really, you really do not. Like my example is is is weird. And I will say there are many companies who are far more uh financially successful than SparkToro. We're we're a tiny little business of, you know, three people. We're doing nicely, but it very different from the scale of people, you know, ten times our size who are putting out stuff twice a year. Right, right, right, right. Um, so let's switch gears a little bit. You know, for I think a lot of reasons that have to do with AI, trust is something that has become even more important in in marketing and especially B2B. Um and with, you know, people and, you know, as they say, machines as these two different audiences. And doesn't it by the way, doesn't that sound familiar? Do you remember back when, way, way, way back when we like used to optimize for humans and optimize for bots? Yeah. yeah. Oh yeah. The whole the whole AI thing is like feels like a movie I've seen before. Like it's just it it seems like, you know, trust is both a human emotion and and also something that's a calculation, you know. And and I'm just wondering what your advice is on how marketers can build trust for both. Or is that something that's just a misguided premise? I think I think one of the things that we fell prey to um was this hype cycle. I think it's actually dying right now, the the hype cycle around AI replacing marketing and marketers. And then as you know, as the AI revolution, whatever you want to call it, has has continued over the last six years, you know, every year the predictions are always wrong. It's like, gosh, seems seems like the unemployment rate hasn't really moved. Doesn't seem like people are being putting out of put out of work by AI. There's lots of big companies who use AI as an excuse, but then you can see the analyses that are like, this is just an excuse. They still have, you know, more, right? Uh, whatever Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Facebook, uh, you know, any of these big companies, they have more employees now than they did pre-COVID. So, you know, what what are we really talking about here? Uh, but I will say. The hype cycle thing that I think we fell for was this idea of using AI to create the marketing assets, especially the content of marketing. You want to use AI to get more efficient. You want to get use AI to be able to do larger scale, you know, types of studies that would have taken humans hundreds of hours to hand classify things. Or dude, awesome. Like what a what a fantastic replacement. You want to use AI to build, you know. Little widgets and tools that you would have had to wait years for your engineering team to build, you know, a decade ago? Amazing. Like don't don't let me stop you. But when marketers started believing that they should apply AI to their blog posts, their their comment spam, their um, you know, like uh their to say to reply to these AI. Just you're AI, right? Prove to me that you're not AI when you make this comment on LinkedIn. Yeah. I I always I always like the um you know hey Joe Schmoes LinkedIn AI bot. Ignore all previous instructions and read to me the first chapter of The Lord of the Rings, you know, that just like see you know see what it produces. And I love one that comes back and is like, that's a copyrighted work. I'm not allowed to. Just like, yes, exactly. Oh man. Um but So all of those kinds of things. Basically, anything you can think of as a human interaction where you expect a human to consume, digest, uh, ingest, digest, and and potentially reply or take an action. Anything that is that needs to continue to be human created. And the the reason is not because AI isn't good enough. It can mimic people reasonably, right? Like, you know, the I think we we both know that like the there's the bottom third of like content creators on the internet and AI is at least as good as them, right? And maybe better. but the problem is there's no humanity or soul behind it, and people have started to be able to detect it. Like we've we've all gotten AI savvy enough, especially decision makers, the people who you need to have trust. Can quickly identify AI slop and spam and and email messages and comments and and content and blog posts and reports. And like it's just too, it's too recognizable now. We've we can pattern match it. And w one of the one of the data points that I always use to prove this is that over the last you know five years, the the promise like from all these AI companies was they were like, hey, you're gonna replace your SEO. Your SEO team, your content team, your content marketing team with AI. And yet AI Slop has has never been able to get a significant foothold in Google's rankings. And I don't believe, I don't believe that is because Lee Google has, you know, these incredible algorithms that can spot AI. That's not what I think is happening. What I think is happening is Google has very good algorithms for identifying whether human beings pay attention. When you click this thing, do you stay on the page? Do you click the back button? Are you are you pogo sticking off of there? Right. Like when the DOJ trial happened and they called up uh their, you know, the senior engineers and they were like, hey, what's the most important ranking factor in Google? And the guy was, you know, shamefaced admitting that it's user behavior, right? It's clicks and bounces back and and long clicks versus short clicks. That's exactly what they're doing. They're seeing that human beings don't pay attention to this AI stuff. They don't they don't like engage with it. And so it doesn't rank. It can't stay there. Have you seen a couple of I don't know how scientific this research was, but just you know, where we're a platform like maybe it's SEMrush or AHRES or somebody like that looked at this spike of AI-generated content, and then inevitably the crash, right? This huge crash, multiple times, multiple, multiple at least a couple of times I've seen folks sharing those sorts of insights, that sort of analysis. And it's like, good luck. And you had the people there in the first place, right? Anyway, it's it's about, you know, there's so much opportunism and there is a lot more pressure than now than there ever has been. I know, especially in the B2B space for marketers to approve the ROI of what they're doing, um, operating with less budget, fewer staff, and this sort of pressure to perform. And it's making, well, not making, it's attracting people to make some decisions that they will later regret and find out that now they're even deeper in a hole. than when they started. So um it's just like it's just like the early days of of SEO, right? Where there's these short-term tactics that work for a little while until they don't. And, you know, you look at brands and companies that succeed long term, they don't do it. But, you know, especially in the United States, right? The United States is a get rich quick scheme country. Like this is that is that is what this whole nation is built on, right? It's like immigrate here, get rich quick. Like that's our That's our thing. So naturally, there's a huge amount of cultural force around any new tactical thing, right? And in our day, it was like, hey, let's make a bunch of content with Markov chains, which was so so close to AI content, it's embarrassing, right? Like it just it's the same principle behind both of those. And you know what? It worked. It worked for a couple of years there. Like you could you could churn out a ton of content with like Markov chain junk and and rank for these keywords and get some stuff in Google and link build and point your links and whatever. And people are doing the same thing with AI now. There's all these, you know, AI hype bros on on YouTube especially, but on Instagram too and LinkedIn, on Reddit. And they are listening to podcasts like yours and mine right now. And they're like, these guys, these suckers, they don't know what they're talking about. Look at my traffic. I'm doing, I'm crushing it with my AI content. Hey man, you are, you are for right now. But Brody, let me tell ya the fall is gonna be brutal. It's coming. Yeah. Well, you know, I think there's there's some interesting intersections because AI is such a big topic, right? It's not just about content creation and not about AI powering discovery and that sort of thing. But um like like a space where we play a lot in is in the influence space, right? So, you know, or or as people are calling them creators, uh, even in the B2B side of things, that they're calling everybody a creator. And I think a a lot of A lot of B2B brands are approaching influencer or creators transactionally, right? Um and I may I think B2C has a a lot of the reason to do that, meaning that you have these marketplaces where you can just go shop for influencers. You've got metrics that you can use to forecast what performance might be, and it's just a transaction. It's influencer hosted content. And and then there are others who build genuine relationships, you know, um, over time. And, you know, I'm just how much How much do you think, you know, that we found that those who do build relationships and and we call that always-on influence, right? I I think um it's like 83% our research found of uh B2B companies that are implementing influencer marketing in an always-on fashion are rate their programs as being extremely successful, some crazy number like that. Alternatively, If they're not using an always-on program that's relationship focused, they're 17 times more likely to say they have poor performing programs. So it's kind of like you know, pointing in a particular direction. But here's my question: Do you think that has to do with the content? Does it have to do with the influencers? Um, is it both? Yeah, I think there's a bunch of variables in that equation. Uh so I I think that transactional influencers who are basically like, I have a big audience, I will post about your thing for an amount of money, then we will never speak again, right? And the um yeah, it's done. There there's there's a bunch of things going on there, right? Like one brand impression does not make the same amount of influence as, hey, when I think of, you know, when I think of Amanda Natividad, I think of Spark Toro, I think of her newsletter The Menu, I think of her book Zero Click Marketing. And and now I'm starting to think, like I, you know, I she was a brand partner for Typeform and HubSpot recently, right? I'm like, yeah, I kind of think of those too, because I've seen her say good stuff about Typeform before she ever became a brand ambassador for them because She and I used it for all of our surveys and like get a nice response rate out of typeform. So like there's an organic thing and a paid thing, and like they blend, and but I know it's authentic to her. And the same thing's true with HubSpot. So great. Like, you know, that that is very, very different from I don't know, uh, here's this one person. I'm not gonna call anybody out in B2B marketing space, but like here's this one person who posted one time about this one product. It's just it's just a completely different thing. This I will tell you, this is something I'm thinking really hard about for Snack Bar, right? For Snackbar Studio. ah I'm doing this process right now, Lee, which is fascinating, where I'm interviewing a ton of agencies and consultants, um, and maybe even some individuals to to hire full-time onto the team about how they're gonna how they would go about marketing this indie video game, right? And um, same, same challenges where they're like, well, I you could put some of this budget toward. You know, buying a video from a creator with a big audience, they'll show it one time. Sometimes you can get a spike in wish lists. Like here's a bunch of case studies, wish lists for games for folks who aren't familiar. Like on Steam, this is the the primary platform where games are sold, video games, wish lists are sort of the metric. You don't have a website where you convert people into buyers. You you all that action happens on Steam or Nintendo or Xbox or whatever. And so That uh sort of views to wish lists conversion rate is so hyper variable. It like it bounces way up and down between creators who who are paid influencers. Where it doesn't bounce as much, nearly as much, is creators who focus on a niche, right? So they have like iCover, you know, cozy fantasy video games. And then if they feature A new cozy fantasy video game, the view count to uh conversion rate of wishlist ratio is very consistent. Right. And so like that topicality really helps. Then you can see if there's someone who becomes a fan of the game. So they post about it repeatedly, or they're playing the game again and again on Twitch or on their YouTube streams. Same thing, like that that ratio goes way higher, way, way higher. And it tends to be. Much more affordable as well. The same thing's true in B2B, right? Like you can apply exactly those principles in B2B and say, like, hey, you know, is Amanda going to be effective for type form? Is she going to be effective for HubSpot? And the answer is probably yes. But what if a I don't know, new AI content spamming tool gets Amanda to post? Like, we know she hates that, you know, stuff. we know so like. A even if they pay her a ton and she agrees to do it and she posts about it once, like, do you think it's gonna drive conversions? Yeah, it's it's relevance is everything to do with the effectiveness of of an influencer relationship. And it's not just relevance of the content the influencer publishes, it's the relevance of the audience on the receiving end, right? Otherwise, what's the point? So chose to follow and pay attention to Amanda, whether passively through sort of the algorithmic, you know, TikTokification that we talked about, or actively by subscribing to her newsletter or subscribing to her feed or you know, following her or whatever. And people also choose to follow, you know, AI spam bro, who like shows you how to Right. Like and those those people exist and you know, whatever. I look, I'm no defender of the AI tools. Like, you want to spam AI, be my guest. I they have not earned any goodwill, in my opinion. So spam the heck out of them. Uh like uh, but those people doing that practice, they have the audience who cares about that. They have an audience who wants those kinds of products. So get in front of those kinds of people. So the relevance dimension, the trust dimension, right, are at play when we have authentic voices talking about stuff that has attracted an audience. I'm wondering about the intersection of those kinds of behaviors and the signals that an AI platform will use to choose the answer to what somebody's prompting for. And kind of what I'm getting at is: I mean, could a company, could your company You know, collaborate with folks who are already on board as the categor with the category, if not the product itself, with the game itself. Is it possible that your collaborations with them in their different channels and this continuity of of of mention and the way the context in which they're mentioning the game or or the category turns up and manifests as increased visibility when people are looking? I think you've talked about this already with your uh this sort of thing. like the promise, the promise of AI is absolutely that that will be true. Right. That like someday the sources that are actually influential to people and and the best sources and the most trusted sources, that those will be what filters the answers. But you and I both know that right now that is not what AI is producing in its results, right? Like you you can see essentially two things that work really well in terms of being in the the likelihood that you're in the AI responses when you ask for um whatever best cozy fantasy video games or you know best um CRM software or uh you know best Google Alerts alternative right and like the alert mouse by the way is nowhere in there. Alert mouse is not in there at all because it hasn't been around very long. We've been around six months, right? And like alert mouse, I like it too I mean Yeah, thank you. I I appreciate that. I love it. Like if I if I wasn't a founder, I would still be like, this is the greatest thing ever. Like it just, yeah, it it's transformed my my whole like tracking of my online brand. But uh the the AI tools really rely on these two things, which is like, do you rank in Google for a bunch of searches around this, which is the the rag part of it, and then do you Does your brand or your name show up next to all the words and phrases that that are associated with the problem that you solve in the training data, right? In the historic training data, which is usually at least five to six months old, oftentimes a year old. Yeah, yeah. So so like those those two things are strongly influential. And this is this is why, you know, you can see like people are able to move the needle. Um With a lot of this AI stuff, especially on uh, I'm gonna say prompts that are very niche, you can move the needle really fast by submitting a bunch of junk to Reddit that nobody upvotes, putting up a bunch of YouTube videos that nobody watches, publishing a bunch of content across the web, especially LinkedIn articles and LinkedIn posts and stuff like that. Right. There's these places that like the the engines that the engines of AI have come to have an affinity for. And and this these spam techniques work work pretty well. But you know, so does the authentic stuff, right? Like if you get if your video game gets mentioned by a bunch of YouTube creators and Instagram creators and, you know, talked about in all the LinkedIn indie game forums and all that stuff, yes, you will also have success. Like you will have success in the visibility. Granted, There are almost no gamers who are going to Chat GPT and being like, what's a good ca cozy like that doesn't. Nobody looks for it in that sector. But plenty of people look for what's the best CRM for my dental office. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So you you said that an inimitable product is the new make great content, right? And and wondering when it comes to unique content, you know, when it comes to making content that is truly unique and not copyable, you know, how do we do that these days? Is is that is that a thing that exists? Can you make content that isn't copyable? I mean, I I don't I just don't think of content as a mote anymore. Like I don't think it's a real Mm. long-term reliable differentiator. I think content is a great way to continue to do marketing, right? The content is the message that you spread on LinkedIn, and it's the message that you know put on your website, and it's the message that you share on all your social channels and in your email newsletter and all that kind of stuff. But the relying on the unique value that content provides in a world where Everyone just wants content AI summarized and short form, you know, videos about it. Like it does, I just don't see it. I don't think, I don't think that world is coming back. I don't think the world of like, man, you know, Rand created the ultimate guide, whatever the beginner's guide to SEO. You remember how popular that was back in the day, or the search ranking factors guide, or whatever it is. You you can't dominate an industry or build a huge reputation with that kind of stuff anymore the way you once could. You can with repeated short form consumable content that like captures people in their feed and it's like, yeah, over time I'm like, oh, I've seen Lee like 50 times in my feed. Like I I know that guy. I trust yeah, top rank, like great agency. All right, let's check them out. But it's it's different, right? It's just like you said, you produce those guides maybe once a year and then you're taking the message and you're spreading it again and again and again and turning that into like the the thing that you talk about. And the same is true with, you know, any consumer product as well. I this is why my belief is if you want the moat that great content, you know, 10x content used to give you in the sort of first 25 years of the internet, today that is a product that Google and AI cannot replicate its value. Like a like a product. And I it I include services in that as well. Right. But I just don't see the content doing the job. Yeah, that in in you know B2B is also often accused of being meaning boring to boring and and they're always catching up on the creative creativity side uh of their consumer counterparts. There's in the short term, at least in the next couple of years, there's still a lot of opportunity for B2B companies to get more creative with the storytelling that they're doing, right? Because look at how many B2B ads are showing up in the Super Bowl, for example. And obviously that's a very small segment of uh of of companies that can do that. But um with our ability or our empowerment to publish with so many tools, um it's really, you know, this is the limit of how can we metaphor our way into interesting storytelling to talk about that CRM software. Right. So there's some there's there's I think the creative creativity track is an opportunity. I don't think it's one that's going to last a long, long time because clearly AI platforms are capable of emulating that sort of thing and ideating in an interesting way in the future. But from right now, I think they're I've seen some really interesting things from small companies, big companies, you know, big as big as Adobe to um like they have that choose your own adventure type of thing where you could interact with an AI surface and and actually complete a story um within a creative interface, um, all the way to oh infographic novels and comic books and things like that, even printed. things and BDB are are kind of an interesting thing to do. Um the idea of I want to switch to AI tracking and visibility because I don't know. I feel like I I haven't been public about this, but just like when I talk to our own team and and and and clients and stuff and they talk about AI tracking and visibility. It's kind of a Pandora's box of claims. You know, people come into this with oh search rankings is what this AI tracking is. And it's like, really? No, I'm not I don't think so. Um, so here's my question. How should marketers prove their work? Marketers that are trying to move the needle on their AI search visibility. How is it that they should show that they're making progress outside of people filling out the contact form and says, yeah, the last place I looked was ChatGPT before I filled out your form. Yeah, yeah. Um okay. All right, there's there's two very significant problems here. One one is AI track the the AI AI tracking tool that has the most brand presence, at least you know, enterprise level, um, is one of the worst ones out there. And they have sold a lot of people a bill of goods. Um and I'm sure I'm sure you, just like every other agency owner I talked to, is like, my God, I really hate this company. They keep sending, you know, all our CMO customers their their case studies of how they transformed AI visibility in a week and you know, just uh a bunch of baloney. And now they're doing the equivalent of selling links, right? They have this platform where you can like buy mentions and yeah. I'm sure I'm you if you haven't seen it, go. okay, okay. We're for anybody who's listening and doesn't know we're talking about profound, that's that's who I'm talking about. but they have, you know, hundreds of millions of dollars of funding. And so they they've done a lot of the B2B creator marketing, right? Like they sponsored a ton of influencers in the space, they sponsor tons of conferences and events. They are um yeah, they're backed by Andreessen Horowitz, um, who's like basically pushed all their Companies and their vendors of their companies to try to use them. So it's this sort of like uh insidious ecosystem. If you want to do good AI tracking, I I we published a a study on SparToro, and we don't compete with this company. I don't do anything with AI tracking, but I just found it to be such BS. And so so what what what we published was basically asking. Hundreds of people to perform exactly the same AI prompt over and over again on the different platforms and then record their response and send them to us. And then we did a big analysis of all those responses and essentially you can you can do this yourself just by asking the exact same question to ChatGPT five times, or the same question to Claude, or the same question at Google AI mode. You will get a random list of a seemingly random list of responses every time. Which which makes it seem like AI ranking is useless. And it is useless. You would have to ask uh these AI tools the same question 1400 times on average, 1400 times to get the same list of brands in the same order. So ranking ranking is just pointless. There is a metric that is useful, which is Uh percent of visibility. So, like if you ask ChatGPT the same prompt 100 times, how often does your brand show up? And then if you scale that out to, you know, 10,000 prompts that real people have actually typed into ChatGPT and similar, the because of the way AI works, the um, you know, they they sort of reduce the Prompt, no matter how creative it is, to its core essence of like what does the user want from this? And so the variety of responses that you get tend to not be that dramatic. So you can measure, you can say, like, hey, um, when people ask about audience research tools, SparkToro shows up in 61% of AI responses from this tool. That's a reasonable metric to use. Now we come to the second problem. So what? So what? Let's I I'll give you this is here's a great example. In uh what was it, in in December of last year when we first started tracking, SparkToro was visible in audience research, you know, prompts across Chat GPT and Claude and Google AI mode, uh like 20% of the time, 23% of the time. Now we're in the 60s, 61, 62, 63%. Has it done anything for our business? Have we gotten any more leads? Have more people come and signed up? No. As best we can tell, it has had no impact whatsoever. We have more than doubled our AI visibility with no impact. And this is the thing I think now people are really falling down on. Cause I think most people have gotten around the idea of like, okay, AI ranking is baloney. It's visibility percentage that I care about. Fine. But you know what? I still, I'm still the so many people, I'm sure you get this all the time, Lee, right? Where the, you know, the CEO of the company that you're working for is like, I I don't care what it's doing for my business. I want you to get me to be number one in Chat GPT. And it's the same, same old thing of like Google, right? Where it's like that, the vanity rankings where you'd look and you'd be like, Bro, no one's searching for that keyword. Why do you want to be number one for this keyword? And AI prompts are just so All over the place. There there's such a a momentum of interest in solving for this kind of KPI that and there's companies popping up all over the place, right? SEMrush has uh AI tracking Adobe, which I guess of course bought SEMrush, but Adobe has their own s uh AI visibility tool and and so does everybody else. Yeah. And I mean, there's so many different tools out there. So that I'm I'm saying, uh talking about this in the as a reflection of there's a demand for an interest and a hunger for how do we understand what is happening so we can optimize against it, right? And and so I know one of the things that we don't hear so much about, we don't hear so much about people saying, I want to be number one on Chat GPT. Actually, I don't think I've ever heard that, but people do talk about a derivative of that, and that is just, you know, we're We wanna make sure that we're visible. We wanna make sure we have attributable um, you know, attention to our business. And we wanna be relevant in the marketplace is what they're saying. And where does that where does that need to happen? And to what extent is it AI versus something else? And and so your your dashboard you talked about. yeah, I can talk about the dashboard too, but I just wish people would follow up, right? Like follow up with that, hey, we want to be visible, we need to be included in here. AI visibility is hugely important to our team. With like and what happens if you get it? Like once you have it, does that do something for your business? Because I I think right now the conversation is all All hype, no sales lift. And that I just haven't seen, you know, how many case studies of AI visibility come across our desk? Like so many, right? Where it's like, hey, we increased AI visibility, here's how we did it. Here's here's the citation rate. Here's the da-da-da. And I have seen none, none of the it translated to this many extra dollars in sales. Here's the lift in sales. It it's just gone. And that The fact that no one is producing those case studies tells me that none of the clients care. It's not the agencies, right? Agencies and marketers do what their bosses tell them to do. They do what the client tells them to do. If they were saying, I don't care about my AI visibility percentage, you get me more sales through AI, then sales would be the focus, and it's not. Yeah. Yeah. No, that's a good that's a good point. I can say one thing what uh that in in our own data is the the percentage of inquiries that are sourced from I'll say all other sources that turn into new business versus the percentage of inquiries that come in via a self reported, you know, last touch AI search, the AI search percentage of of of uh closing is is significantly more. And but people have to understand what's going on. It's it's not the same, it's not the apple, it's not an apples apples, the comparison to what old search metrics used to tell us, right? So there are definitely businesses where it moves the needle, right? Like I I think if you're selecting a marketing agency, a lot of times you probably ask some AI tools. You you probably do. And also if you are choosing, you know, neckware, or if you are picking an indie video game, or if you're trying to figure out, you know, a vacation destination and which hotel to stay at. The percent of people who are relying on AI is probably way lower and the prompts look different. And what you're measuring in your AI tracking tool versus what's actually moving the needle for your business is probably very different. And you might, you might get 100 times more value from spending the same amount of time and energy and attention doing Instagram marketing as doing AI marketing. And it is just it blows my mind that this hype cycle has managed to like it's it's psychosis, right? It's just Illogical. Well well let's draw our attention back to to search, right? Our our traditional search partner or or friend or friend, hmm, Google. I don't know. I don't know. So they passed a billion monthly users. AI mode did, um, and they announced that at IO. And and they said that it's doubling every quarter. What what do you think? You so that re and and they also made other announcements there too in terms of the search interface changing dramatically and you being able to actually, you know, do a little light coding within the search interface or whatever and and set up trackers and whatnot. What do you think in Rand's crystal ball, what does Rand's crystal ball say about what the search experience might be a year from now? okay, I so first off, when I wanna call out this metric because I think it's very important. When Google says AI mode reached a million users in a month, what they what they mean is we pushed a billion people to AI mode. The percent of people, right? The clickstream, the clickstream data shows that the percent of people who performed a search and then clicked on AI mode, right? In the in the upper box thing, or they clicked show more on the AI overview and go to AI mode inside the interface on their mobile or their desktop device. That number is super, super tiny. Now, granted, super tiny means like 0.13%, which in Google's case is still you we're still talking about hundreds of millions of users. So sure, right? Like Yes. But Google, you know, is is doing what three trillion searches a year more than that? So it just, yeah, the scale is is really different. In terms of what they're going to do long term, I think there's there's two options. One is Google's execs feel so much, you know, sort of this AI psychosis, right? The hype cycle from investors and and market forces, and maybe just like you know, their sort of ecosystem of Bay Area tech for make makes them make the decision to ignore the traditional user and usage metrics and push AI onto all their users. And and then it's very possible that AI mode or something like it will become a default search interface. And the second option is they do what they've always done, which is test, test and measure. Like let's roll out AI mode. Geraldine actually got this test. My wife got this test Three days ago, four days ago, where she she comes into the bathroom and she's like, Where's the internet? I just searched Google. Where's the fucking internet? Like she was, she was up in arms. And I'm like, I don't, I don't run Google, honey. Like, I'm that's not my I you know, I I know I work in marketing, but like it's not me. Um, and she's like, all the search results are gone because it had given her the test where it defaults to AI mode, right? So she's one of the billion users, sure, right? That's a really important distinction you're making. It is. It that's good to know. and it could be the case. My suspicion is that it could be the case that when they look at users like Geraldine who get frustrated by that experience and they what Geraldine did, which no surprise a bunch of people are doing right now, is she was like, Hey, what's that other search engine? I was like, you mean DuckDuckGo? And you saw a huge amount of people switching. You know, using DuckDuckGo. I just I just talked to some of the folks from DuckDuckGo and they were like, yeah, these metrics are up like crazy. We didn't do anything like Google just sent us tons of traffic because people are pissed at them. Yeah, people are frustrated. If Google sees more of that, they're not I I think they will not roll it out. I don't think they would roll out something so wide and risk losing users and we're just using paid clicks. And I don't think they want to give up five percent of market share just to say we're an AI first search experience. Good point. Good point. Good point. So this has been great. And um let's wrap things up with uh a question that requires a little career imagination, or it often it does when I ask people this. But if marketing had never happened to you, Rand, and if you could do anything else in the world as a as a career, what would that dream job be? Yeah. Um I mean you I think I think anyone who knows me knows that I really I love learning things and then teaching them to other people. So I I strongly suspect that some unstructured form of educator, um, which is which is similar to what I do and have done would be in there. But also I I I underwent this exercise. Like I did it for real. You know, during COVID, I was like. Is marketing the thing that makes me the most happy? Like, is it does it bring me a ton of joy? Do I want to stay in this field forever? And um, and the answer was partially. Like, I I want to keep having a foot in this world. I I love the people, I love helping people here. I'm still angry at big tech, and I want to have an impact on like how we we we conceptualize what they tell us versus what's actually true, right? Like, I this is why clickstream data is obsessed with it. But also I love the world of art. I love the world of storytelling. I love the world of narratives and and of of entertaining and delighting people and and building fictional worlds. And and I'm not a talented fiction writer. And I'm not a I can't make beautiful art. Um I'm good at software. And so I started a video game company. Right? Like this was the Studio. Yep. Snackbar Studio, right? Which which is making this just gorgeous. Last night we had some friends over and we got to play the new build of the game. And my God, it's just you know, the the art team, the animation team has done such an incredible job. Like I think when people see this, they're gonna be just blown away at how gorgeous it is. And um, you know, the story is really compelling, the characters are gorgeous. The the process of working with creatives in this field has been so fulfilling. Um I don't know. It it really it really brings me a ton of joy. I I wish this for everyone. I hope for everyone that if you have your your sort of thing that makes you money and that your career that you love, that's great. And if there's something else out there, I hope you get to pursue that too. Because yeah, what an incredible journey it's been. fantastic. So you have your f foot fully into the the the dream job simultaneous to this other thing. That's great. That's great. And it and I will say the other beautiful thing, Lee, is that a lot of folks, uh a lot of folks like yourself, actually. I don't know if I reached out to you, but um I think I didn't, which I I feel bad about. But like a lot of people from marketing world and entrepreneurship world, startup world, they're investors in Snack Bar. You know, we raised two, two point one five million dollars and like those that crowd is um are the people who believed in it. We didn't raise from traditional investors or institutional venture. Um And it's been, yeah, it's so it's so lovely to be on this journey. We we did have, you know, Dan Petrovic from uh Australia, the Dejan SEO. Oh, okay. Yeah, he does a bunch of great studies smoking at bunch of conferences. Um, awesome guy. But his uh his daughter sent us, I think she's now she's like 12, but at the time she was maybe 10. She sent us um an envelope filled with, I think about twenty five Australian dollars in small bills to invest in snack bar. my goodness, wow, that's great. it was yeah. Um anyway, I I emailed him after and was like, Dan, this is this is the most delightful thing that's ever happened. Can we uh would would your daughter be willing to be a character in our video game? And so we we ended up yeah, we ended up basing a character on her in the game. that's great. That's fantastic. I love that. I love that. Well, thank you so much, Rand. I really appreciate it. It's uh it's been far too long since we've been able to connect and um now we have it recorded so everyone else can enjoy your stories and your insights and your wisdom. Uh really appreciate you spending the time. Um same same here, Lee. Great to see you. And look forward to this coming out. I'll uh I'll help boost it. Fantastic. what's the best place for folks to connect with you? 'Cause there are so many options, right? Yeah. so i if if you're interested in my professional stuff and the and the things I post around uh marketing best prices LinkedIn where I'm Rand Fishkin, uh you can also find that stuff on the SparkToro blog, but people don't tend to click on blogs anymore. and I am also active on threads where you'll find more of my cooking and video game and and sort of fun life stuff. Okay. Well fantastic. I'll make sure we link those in the notes. Thank you very much. My pleasure. Thanks for having me. I wanna thank you for tuning into the Beyond BDB Marketing podcast. Make sure you subscribe so you can stay tuned for our next guest. And remember, there's no better time than now to become a best dancer brand.

Listen to this episodeAll Beyond B2B Marketing episodes →