The B2B Podcast Index
Index
All categories
MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
MethodologySubmit
Best of:MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
An independent project byFame
SearchBest episodesGuestsInsightsMethodologySubmit a podcast
Index/Ops/The Modern Hotelier
The Modern Hotelier artwork

#301: Helping Hotels Reduce Revenue Leakage | with Mike Baldinger

The Modern Hotelier · 2026-06-30 · 14 min

0:00--:--

Key moments - from our scoring

Substance score

63 / 100

Five dimensions, 20 points each

Insight Density14 / 20
Originality11 / 20
Guest Caliber12 / 20
Specificity & Evidence15 / 20
Conversational Craft11 / 20

Most hoteliers focus on OTA commission rates while missing substantial hidden revenue leakage - averaging $130,000 annually for a typical 300-room hotel. Mike Baldinger, co-founder and chief strategy officer at Evention, explains that the problem stems from OTA reservations touching multiple disconnected systems (channel managers, PMS, payment processors, banks, general ledgers), each recording slightly different versions of the transaction truth. Issues include virtual credit cards being undercharged, overpaid commissions, incorrect resort fees and taxes, and front-desk agents accidentally charging guests' physical cards instead of OTA virtual cards. Beyond direct revenue loss, mischarged guests post negative reviews that damage ratings and future bookings - compounding the impact to $430,000 annually per hotel when including reputation damage. Baldinger positions Evention not as a reconciliation tool but as a financial trust layer that continuously validates every dollar across POS, PMS, processors, and banks. The differentiation matters because reconciliation tools only compare numbers after the fact, while a trust layer validates transactions in real-time and prevents errors before they compound. Hotels currently validating OTA reservations at summary level rather than detailed reservation level are almost certainly experiencing undetected leakage. For multi-hotel operators, this problem scales to millions in annual exposure.

Key takeaways

  • →Hotels lose an average of $130,000 annually per 300-room property through OTA revenue leakage from virtual credit card undercharges, commission overpayment, and guest mischarges - a $430,000 problem when including guest experience and reputation damage.
  • →OTA settlements involve multiple disconnected systems (channel manager, PMS, payment processor, bank, general ledger) where each records a different version of truth, creating opportunities for missed charges, misclassifications, and payment errors.
  • →Validating OTA reservations at summary or total level masks underlying errors; hotels must validate at detailed reservation level (individual room rates, resort fees, taxes) to catch distributed leakage.
  • →Evention's financial trust layer continuously validates every dollar across all financial systems without manual spreadsheets, preventing errors before they impact guest experience and brand reputation rather than reconciling after the fact.
  • →Hotels should audit negative reviews mentioning billing issues (mischarge, double charge, resort fees) on OTA platforms as practical evidence of OTA workflow and reconciliation process failures.

Guests

Mike Baldinger

Topics in this episode

Revenue leakageEventionOTA reconciliationVirtual credit cardsFinancial trust layerOTA ReconChannel managersProperty management systemsPayment processorsGuest billing accuracy

Questions this episode answers

How much revenue are hotels typically losing through OTA channels without knowing it?

A typical 300-room hotel with significant OTA distribution loses approximately $130,000 per year through virtual credit card undercharges, overpaid commissions, incorrect taxes and resort fees, and cancellation errors - expanding to $430,000 annually when factoring in guest experience and reputation damage.

Why do finance teams fail to detect OTA revenue leakage even when it's happening?

Hotels typically validate OTA reservations at summary or total level rather than line-item detail, which masks underlying errors; additionally, overcharges in one area can offset undercharges elsewhere, making totals appear correct while settlements are actually problematic.

What are the main causes of guest mischarges in OTA bookings?

Common issues include virtual credit cards being charged for incorrect amounts, front-desk agents accidentally charging guests' physical cards instead of OTA virtual cards, incorrect resort fees or taxes posted to folios, and failures to process cancellations or short-stays correctly.

What question should a hotel GM or CFO ask to determine if they have an OTA problem?

Ask whether the team validates OTA reservations at summary level or detailed reservation level (down to individual room rates, resort fees, and taxes); if they're using summary-level validation, revenue is almost certainly leaking.

How does a financial trust layer differ from a reconciliation tool?

A reconciliation tool compares numbers after the fact, while a financial trust layer continuously validates every dollar across all financial systems (POS, PMS, processors, banks) in real-time to ensure accuracy and explainability before errors compound.

What our scoring noted

Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.

Insight Density

14 / 20

The episode identifies a genuine, quantifiable business problem (revenue leakage through OTA channels) and provides specific examples of failure modes (VCC undercharges, commission overages, miscellaneous fees). However, the conversation stays largely at the problem-identification level rather than drilling into solutions, methodologies, or implementation specifics. Most insights are relatively straightforward once stated (reconciliation at detail vs. summary level), limiting novelty.

the amount of revenue that's really leaking out their doors each night through these OTA channels. And the examples there would be virtual credit cards that are not charged correctly, commissions that are overpaid, things like resort fees, taxes, or cancellations that are not being charged
a single OTA reservation touches multiple systems. And every one of those systems records a slightly different version of the truth

Originality

11 / 20

The core insight - that distributed, invisible leakage compounds into material losses - is sound and relatively fresh for a hospitality audience, but the framing is fairly standard fintech/B2B SaaS positioning (distributed small problems, siloed systems, trust layer language). The guest avoids clichés but doesn't challenge existing frameworks or offer contrarian takes. The financial trust layer vs. reconciliation distinction feels marketing-forward rather than conceptually novel.

nobody's going to ignore a $10,000 problem, but many of us may ignore 1,000 $10 problems
a financial trust layer is something much broader than that. So this sits beneath all of your financial activities and processes and continuously validates every dollar

Guest Caliber

12 / 20

Mike Baldinger is co-founder and CSO of Evention, giving him legitimate operational experience building a fintech solution for hospitality. However, he is a vendor speaking about his own product at a trade show booth, which creates clear incentive misalignment. There is no indication he has direct hotel operations or CFO experience, limiting his practitioner credibility. He is credible on his specific problem domain but not a seasoned hotel operator.

co-founder and chief strategy officer at Evention
we are at the Evention booth today

Specificity & Evidence

15 / 20

The episode includes concrete numbers: $130,000 annual leakage for a typical 300-room hotel, $430,000 total impact including reputation, and $43 million across a 100-hotel portfolio. Named OTA channels (Booking.com, Expedia) and specific failure categories (VCC, commissions, resort fees, cancellations) ground the discussion. However, the dollar figures lack sourcing methodology or sample data transparency, and there are no competitor comparisons or implementation timelines.

for a typical 300-room hotel with significant OTA distribution, we're seeing about $130,000 a year in revenue leakage
if you combine the direct revenue leakage with the impact on the guest experience and the ratings, that can be $430,000 a year of impact

Conversational Craft

11 / 20

Steve Carran asks competent, logical follow-ups that allow Baldinger to expand on his points (e.g., 'Is it really that simple?', 'What do you mean by invisible?'). However, Carran rarely pushes back, asks for comparative data, requests concrete implementation details, or challenges the vendor's framing. The conversation reads as collaborative and friendly rather than probing. There is no productive disagreement or skeptical follow-up on the methodology behind the $130k figure or the solution's actual ROI.

Which touches a lot more points than I previously thought
What range of exposure do you actually see when you get into those operators' data?

Conversation analysis

Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.

Most-used words

mike23baldinger18steve18carran17guest15otas11sure11hotels9evention9charged9revenue8financial8hotel7team7systems6card6

Episode notes

In this episode, Steve Carran sits down with Mike Baldinger, Co-Founder and Chief Strategy Officer at Evention, live from HITEC San Antonio, to uncover one of hospitality's most overlooked profit leaks: OTA revenue reconciliation. While most hoteliers understand OTA commission costs, Mike explains why the real financial risk lies beneath the surface. From virtual credit card errors and overpaid commissions to billing mistakes and guest disputes, hotels could be losing hundreds of thousands of dollars annually without realizing it. The conversation explores: Why OTA revenue leakage often goes undetected Common billing and reconciliation mistakes hotels make How inaccurate guest charges impact online reviews and brand reputation The hidden financial risks of disconnected hospitality systems Why Evention is building a "financial trust layer" instead of just another reconciliation tool Practical questions every GM and CFO should ask their finance team this week Watch the FULL EPISODE on YouTube: Links: Mike Baldinger on LinkedIn: Evention: For full show notes head to: Follow on LinkedIn: Join the conversation on today's episode on The Modern Hotelier LinkedIn page

Full transcript

14 min

Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.

The Modern Hotelier #301: Helping Hotels Reduce Revenue Leakage | with Mike Baldinger === Steve Carran: Welcome to an episode of The Modern Hotelier coming to you from HITEC in San Antonio. Today we are joined by Mike Baldinger, co-founder and chief strategy officer at Evention, and we are at the Evention booth today. How we doing, Mike? Mike Baldinger: I'm doing great.

It's day two of HITEC and it's a great week so far. Excited. Steve Carran: Yeah. I walked past your booth yesterday, and it was packed.

Yes. So looked like things were going pretty well for you. Mike Baldinger: Yeah. We're having a great time.

Steve Carran: So Mike, I wanna start off by this, 'cause we talk to so many hoteliers. Yep. And when we talk about OTAs to hoteliers, they seem like they have a good handle on OTAs. What do you think?

Do they really have as good of handle as they think they do, or could they be doing something better? Mike Baldinger: Well, I do think most hoteliers have a good grasp of the obvious cost of OTAs. They know the commission rates, and they know that it drives a significant volume of their bookings. But what I think really surprises a lot of the operators is the amount of revenue that's really leaking out their doors each night through these OTA channels.

And the examples there would be virtual credit cards that are not charged correctly, commissions that are overpaid, things like resort fees, taxes, or cancellations that are not being charged. So these are just examples, but the better question I think an operator should be asking is not, "What is my commission rate?" but, "Can I ensure that all of my OTA reservations are being settled correctly, and can I ensure that all my guests are being charged correctly?" Because that's really where the gap is occurring.

Steve Carran: Well, I agree, and I guess when I think, when I thought about OTAs, I'm like, "It's a pretty simple process. I pay the OTAs. OTAs pay the hotels." Is it really that simple?

Mike Baldinger: Well, on the surface, it feels like it should be that simple. Yes, the guest pays the OTA, and the hotel gets paid. But the reality is that a single OTA reservation touches multiple systems. And every one of those systems records a slightly different version of the truth.

So if I book through an OTA, I'll of course pay the OTA. That OTA, in many cases, will issue a virtual credit card. That VCC flows through a channel manager into a property management system. There's a payment processor that charges the card.

The bank funds the card, sometimes for the full amount, sometimes not. And then the general ledger tries to make sense of all of it. And then you add in the real-world complexity, like a guest short staying, a guest canceling, taxes or resort fees showing up on the wrong folio, or one of the biggest issues is the guest being mischarged or a front-desk agent accidentally charging the guest's physical card instead of the OTA's virtual card. Sure.

So those are some of the examples of things that can go wrong. Steve Carran: Which touches a lot more points than I previously thought. Seems like a very simple process, but a lot goes on behind the scenes. Mike Baldinger: Yes.

Steve Carran: So you talk about OTA losses being invisible. What do you mean by that, and why do smart finance teams miss this? Mike Baldinger: Yeah, so I think the best way to describe this is nobody's going to ignore a $10,000 problem, but many of us may ignore 1,000 $10 problems. Sure.

And that's really the nature of distributed leakage. Each individual variant seems small enough, "Eh, let's not put a team on that. Let's not really chase it," but they compound to staggering numbers. And the other reason that it often can be invisible is that many hotels look at this from a totals or summaries perspective.

That's where they're doing the validation, but a lot can hide in totals. You can have an overcharge in one area offset with an undercharge in another. And so the totals might look fine or close to fine, but the underlying settlements can be a complete mess. Steve Carran: Sure, sure.

And what range of exposure do you actually see when you get into those operators' data? Mike Baldinger: Sure. So for a typical 300-room hotel with significant OTA distribution, we're seeing about $130,000 a year in revenue leakage, and that's from some of those categories I just described. That's VCCs that are undercharged, commissions overpaid, taxes, resort fees, cancellations, those types of things that are leaking.

But what I think surprises operators the most is not the direct revenue leakage. It's actually the impact of guest reviews and the negative guest experience. So when you have a guest that is mischarged, that creates a financial discrepancy, but it creates a guest experience problem. Steve Carran: Yep.

Mike Baldinger: So that guest is likely going to complain. They're maybe going to file a chargeback or post a review, and that could be a real public review, something that says, "Hey, I stayed at this hotel. They double charged me, and it took two weeks to resolve that." So reviews affect your ratings, and ratings are going to affect your future bookings and ADR.

So that's kind of the complexity here. If you combine the direct revenue leakage with the impact on the guest experience and the ratings, that can be $430,000 a year of impact. And that's for a problem most hotels aren't even tracking. You multiply that across a portfolio of, let's say, 100 hotels, that's $43 million a year.

So this is not a back office accounting problem. This is strategic financial risk that belongs on their risk register because it touches revenue, the guest experience, and brand reputation simultaneously. Steve Carran: That is crazy, and I feel like we talked about the disputes for hotels, and I feel like hotels have always been at a disadvantage against the OTAs. Where does that come from, and are we able to shift that at all?

Mike Baldinger: Well, I think there is a perception of a disadvantage, but it really just comes down to timing and evidence. And it's true, OTAs do have strict timelines. Your virtual credit cards do expire. Sure.

And if you don't charge within that window, that money is gone. That's breakage back to the OTA. Commissions have to be disputed within a specific timeline, and if you don't dispute there, again, that's breakage. But the way to shift the balance here isn't really to be more aggressive with the OTAs.

The OTAs are key partners here. They're driving a significant amount of business. So what we all want is fairness and accuracy for all three parties: the OTAs, the hotels, and most importantly, the guest. And the way to really reset that balance is just helping the hotels be able to answer those simple questions.

What was booked? What was paid? What was funded? What was charged?

What was commissionable? And were all my guests charged correctly? So if a hotel can answer those questions easily and within the timelines that they need to, it completely changes the conversation. Steve Carran: Absolutely.

And Evention is described as a financial trust layer, not a reconciliation tool. Can you tell us why that differentiation matters and how hotel operators should be thinking about this whole category? Mike Baldinger: Absolutely. So a reconciliation tool is really something that compares numbers after the fact, but a financial trust layer is something much broader than that.

So this sits beneath all of your financial activities and processes and continuously validates every dollar to ensure accuracy, accountability, and that every dollar is explainable. And in hospitality, we have so many different disconnected systems. Sure. You've got your POS, your PMS, your processors, your banks, your cash, and every one of those systems records its slice of the truth, but there's no single system that has the whole truth, and that's really the role that Evention plays.

So we bring all of those different pieces together to really allow operators to know that what was recorded, what was deposited, what was collected are all aligned. So that's really what a financial trust layer is. OTA Recon is an example of that, but the bigger picture is financial truth across the whole operation. Steve Carran: And we talk so much about siloed technology and these disconnected systems, and feel like we've been talking about it for five, 10 years.

Mike Baldinger: Yes. Steve Carran: So it sounds like Evention bridges that gap and really makes sure that there's nothing slipping through the cracks, which is pretty cool. Mike Baldinger: Yes. Steve Carran: Yes.

So you mentioned OTA Recon. Can you tell us a little bit more about that? Because it sounds like you're solving quite a bit with that with tips, gratuities, credit card reconciliation, cash, things like that. Mike Baldinger: Yeah.

So the common thread here is really trust after checkout. So in Evention's world, the process does not end when the guest pays or when they check out. That's actually the beginning of the validation process. So again, in hospitality, a dollar can move through so many different systems.

If I pay at the hotel, it's going to go through a terminal, and then a gateway, a processor, POS, PMS, bank, general ledger, and every one of those moves creates an opportunity for something to be missed, misclassified, delayed, or paid incorrectly. So the Evention platform is really designed to allow an operator, financial team, ownership group to be able to track those dollars and trust that every dollar is validated, and they can do this without spending manual processes, putting spreadsheets in place, and doing after-the-fact cleanup.

Steve Carran: That's great. So we have a lot of hoteliers that are gonna be listening to this. Yeah. If I'm a GM, CFO, and I'm not sure if I have an OTA problem, what's one question I should be asking my team this week to see if I do have a problem?

Mike Baldinger: I might actually have them ask two questions. So the first one that I would ask is just go back to the team and ask them if they are validating their OTA reservations at a summaries or totals level, or if they're doing it at the detailed reservation level, all the way down to the resort fee, the room rates, the taxes. Because if they're doing it at a summary level, I can almost guarantee you there's revenue leaking. The second question I would have them ask is, are we sure that every one of our guests is being charged correctly for each and every stay?

Because that's really the core of it. It's not all about revenue recovery, it's really about protecting the guest experience. And one practical thing I would have any hotel operator do is just go onto Booking.com, Expedia, whatever your favorite portal is, and search for negative reviews related to billing.

You could search for things like mischarge, double charge, charged twice, resort fees, and you're very likely to find errors. And if you do, that's really just public evidence that shows that there's failures in your OTA workflows or your OTA reconciliation processes. Steve Carran: Great questions to ask your team. Well done, Mike.

This was a great conversation. Love to hear how Evention is helping hoteliers and guests make sure they're not getting charged wrong. So for those that are listening, what is the best way to learn more about Evention and get in touch with you or your team? Mike Baldinger: Yeah, absolutely.

Our website is eventionllc.com. We would love for them just to reach out and our team, both here in the US and in Europe, can walk them through all their processes, show them what this looks like for their operation. We'd love the opportunity to talk to any of those teams.

Steve Carran: Sounds good. Well, this has been a great conversation, Mike. Thank you so much. That does it for another episode of The Modern Hotelier, hospitality's most engaged podcast.

Don't forget to follow, like and subscribe, and we'll see you next time. Mike Baldinger: Thanks, Steve. Steve Carran: Thanks, Mike.

Related episodes across the Index

Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.

  • Cash Pay From the Pharma Manufacturer Point of View, With Ophelia JohnsonRelentless Health Value · on Revenue leakage86 / 100
  • 1st of the Month Wrangle: Can We Stop Marketing Properties and Start Marketing to People? with Lasoh CEO Orlie BenjaminAlex and Annie · on Property management systems79 / 100
  • The Economics of Payment Processing: A Complete Breakdown - Full Episode | On The WireOn The Wire · on Payment processors76 / 100
  • TCP086: AI, IoT and Bottom-Line Bliss with Fabio ZaniboniThe Tech Chef, Restaurant, Hospitality and Hotel Technology Business Podcast · on Property management systems75 / 100
  • Balancing Vision and Execution: Insights from Sonny KerstiensTake Care with Josh Ramsey · on Property management systems66 / 100
  • Marcelo Bicudo - Founder TravelCashWilka Leadership Talks · on Channel managers59 / 100

More from The Modern Hotelier

All episodes →
  • #305: Transparency & Confidence is Key in Owner Accounting | with Brian McGeown52 / 100
  • #304: How In-Room Tablets Are Increasing Guest Engagement & Unlocking Revenue | with Kevin Bidner65 / 100
  • #303: How Hotel Maintenance Impacts the Guest & the Bottom Line | with Chris Zach59 / 100
  • #302: How the Best Hotel Operators Are Approaching Technology | with Jake Lewis68 / 100
  • #300: Innovating the Meeting & Events Sales Process | with Mike Waltman67 / 100
Explore the best B2B Ops podcasts →
All The Modern Hotelier episodes →