The Daily Leadership Conversations Podcast · 2025-12-10 · 29 min
Key moments - from our scoring
Substance score
38 / 100
Five dimensions, 20 points each
Mark Kluger, labor and employment attorney and founder of Kluger Healy LLC, discusses how performance management serves dual purposes: developing employees to reach their potential while creating documented records that reduce employer litigation risk. The conversation reveals a critical disconnect: managers often write inflated performance reviews (marking "exceeds expectations") to avoid conflict, then attempt to terminate those same employees without any supporting documentation of performance problems. Kluger emphasizes that managers frequently conflate being "the boss" with providing criticism, when their real role should be mentorship and skill-building. He stresses the importance of articulating clear expectations, recognizing diverse learning styles, and documenting all performance conversations - not as legal protection, but as fundamental communication. HR leaders, operations managers, and business owners will find practical insights on structuring performance improvement plans, understanding unconscious conflict avoidance in documentation, and the critical difference between managing compliance and building commitment culture. The episode challenges the Friday 5pm termination pattern and reveals how poor communication and passive-aggressive management create liability while damaging team performance.
Managers unconsciously approach performance reviews from a conflict-avoidance perspective, writing things that will avoid confrontation rather than accurately documenting performance issues. This creates a documentation problem when they later want to terminate the employee, as they have no supporting evidence for the termination decision.
Managers often think their role is to provide criticism and direct orders, whereas effective performance management should be built on mentorship, education, and training. This mindset shift is crucial because most people want to do well and need support, guidance, and clear expectations rather than blame.
Expectations must be explicitly articulated in writing and communicated multiple times through different formats, since people learn differently - some need demonstrations, others need written instructions or videos. Sending a single email or mentioning expectations once is insufficient; managers must ensure comprehension through repeated, intentional communication.
Documentation clarifies expectations for both the manager and employee in writing, reducing misunderstandings and passive-aggressive communication. It helps employees understand what they need to improve and demonstrates that genuine opportunities to succeed were provided before any termination decision.
This refers to employers calling employment lawyers on Friday at 5pm wanting to terminate an employee immediately, typically because the manager wants the person gone and doesn't want to see them Monday morning. These rushed terminations often lack proper documentation or performance management groundwork, creating significant legal liability.
Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.
There are genuine practitioner nuggets - particularly the litigation-reverse-engineering framing and the legal danger of 'satisfactory' ratings - but much of the runtime is consumed by the host delivering extended, generic leadership platitudes about coaching, communication, and culture that add little for an experienced operator. The useful signal is real but sparse.
that's really how I got into doing performance management training is because I started reverse engineering all the things that went wrong in litigation
you take, uh, a 10 year employee with Satisfactory every year for 10 years and put them in front of a jury after they were fired and there's, and they're bringing an age discrimination case and the jury's going to look in the dictionary and see satisfactory means meeting expectations
The 'satisfactory-as-legal-liability' angle is a genuinely non-obvious insight for non-lawyers, and the framing of adjective-based reviews as a systematic courtroom vulnerability is fresh. However, the vast majority of the conversation covers thoroughly recycled territory: conflict avoidance in reviews, managers promoted for technical skills not leadership, the shift from annual to continuous feedback - all standard HR canon.
I raged against the adjective form of reviews, even if it's more often than annual, because the adjectives don't mean anything
if you give satisfactory, okay, that's not good or excellent or exceeds expectations. So in their mind the manager is giving them a poor grade
Mark Kluger is a genuine practitioner - a founding partner of an employment law firm with demonstrable real-world caseload experience - and his insights visibly derive from actual litigation rather than theory. However, he is a regional small-firm attorney, not someone who has operated at enterprise scale, and the episode does not surface credentials that would distinguish him as exceptional within his field.
I have found over time that...it's important to recognize...people learn differently
I have done training in police departments, management training for, uh, police officers
The episode offers illustrative anecdotes - the Friday-5pm call pattern, the police lieutenant example, the 10-year-satisfactory employee facing an age discrimination jury - but there are zero named cases, zero dollar figures, no statistics, no named companies, and no verifiable data points. The examples illuminate but do not substantiate.
Those are always Friday at 5 o'clock...You can ask any management defense lawyer, they'll tell you
I had one cop who's a lieutenant or captain who stood up...I learned great when people yell at me
The host routinely delivers multi-paragraph monologues filled with generic management commentary before asking open, non-specific questions, crowding out the guest's more substantive content. There is no pushback, no probing follow-up, and no productive disagreement anywhere in the episode - it is an extended mutual agreement session.
why don't we, as we start out, uh, just frame up from your perspective, uh, how you look at performance management
Well, Mark, this has just been a fantastic conversation
Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.
In this podcast episode, Dr. Jonathan H. Westover talks with performance management, workplace dynamics, and employer liabilities. Mark F. Kluger practices exclusively in the area of labor and employment law on behalf of employers. For ten years, before founding Kluger Healey, LLC, he was Chairman of the Labor and Employment Department of one of New Jersey’s oldest law firms. Mark is a frequent speaker and writer on sexual harassment and discrimination avoidance, workplace diversity, performance management, union avoidance, and a myriad of other employment-related subjects and regularly conducts training sessions for employers on these critical topics. In addition, Mark has extensive experience in counseling employers on issues involving discipline and discharge, reductions in force, mergers and acquisitions, compliance with wage and hour, disability, COBRA, and family and medical leave laws. He regularly drafts all forms of employment policies and handbooks, severance agreements, employment contracts, non-competition and confidentiality agreements, and affirmative action plans.
Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.
Mark Kluger: I'm not giving up.
John: I am selling the building.
Speaker C: The final season of FX is the Bear.
John: The restaurant is flooded.
Speaker D: Everything's either gonna be okay.
John: No, stop. Or not.
Mark Kluger: We are outgunned and we are outmanned. But we have each other.
John: FX's the Bear the final Season all episodes now Streaming on Disney 4th of
Narrator: July Savings are happening now at the Home Depot with select appliances starting at $398 plus get free delivery on appliance purchases of $398 or more. No membership required. Upgrade your kitchen with a modern and sleek GE Profile refrigerator featuring hands free autofill for the perfect pour every time and make laundry day easier with 2 in 1 washer dryer combo innovation that completes laundry in about 90 minutes. Shop top brand appliances now at the UM Home Depot offer valid June 17th July at the US only C store Online
Narrator: this episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome? That's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50 page restoration block or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it, ready to make anything online make sense. There's no place like Chrome. Check responses Setup required. Compatibility and availability varies. 18
Speaker C: whatever your thing it could be anything. Canva helps you make that thing a thing. Canva is a simple online tool thing. It's a way to design with our magic AI tool things you can social media your thing, generate images or videos of your thing, make decks or presentations to show your thing whatever needs to be done for your thing. Canva uh, can make it an even better and bigger thing. Canva the thing that makes anything a thing.
Narrator: Study and play come together on a Windows 11 PC and for a limited time, college students get the best of both worlds. Get the unreal college deal everything you need to study and play with select Windows 11 PCs. Eligible students get a year of Microsoft 365 Premium and a year of Xbox game Pass ultimate with a custom color Xbox wireless controller. Learn more@windows.com studentoffer law supplies last ends June 30th terms at aka mscollegepc.
Narrator: Welcome to the HCI family of UH podcasts where your source for personal, professional and organizational growth and development. We share our own original research, explore industry trends and interview executives and thought leaders from across the globe. Join us for practitioner oriented content around all things leadership, hr, Talent management, Organizational development and Change management. Maximize your personal and organizational potential with the HCI Family of podcasts.
Narrator: When you need to build up your team to handle the growing chaos at work, use Indeed Sponsor Jobs. It gives your job post the boost it needs to be seen and helps reach people with the right skills, certifications and more. Spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit at indeed indeed.com podcast. That's indeed.com podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Need a hiring hero? This is a job for Indeed Sponsored
Narrator: Jobs Trading at Schwab is now powered by Ameritrade Unlocking the power of thinkorswim the award winning trading platforms loaded with features that let you dive deeper into the market. Visualize your trades in a new light on thinkorswim desktop with robust charting and analysis tools, all while you uncover new opportunities with up to the minute market news and insights. ThinkOrSwim is available on desktop, web and mobile to meet you where you are. It's built by the trading obsessed to help you trade brilliantly. Learn more@schwab.com Trading this episode is brought
Narrator: to you by State Farm. You know those friends who support your preference for podcasts over music on road trips. That's the energy State Farm brings to insurance. With over 19,000 local agents, they help you find the coverage that fits your needs so you can spend less time worrying about insurance and more time enjoying the ride. Download the State Farm app or go online@statefarm.com like a good neighbor, State Farm is there.
Narrator: This episode is brought to you by Palmolive. Family time isn't just the big moments. It's weeknight dinners, sitting around the table, everyone talking all at once. So when the plates are empty and the sink is full, use Palmolive Ultra. Palmolive's most powerful formula removes up to 99.9% of grease, leaving your dishes sparkling clean. And the new convenient pump makes cleaning even easier so you can spend less time tackling dishes and more time together.
Narrator: Shop now@palmolive.com chronic migraine 15 or more headache days a month, each lasting four hours or more, can make me feel like a spectator in my own life. Botox Onobotulinum toxin a prevents headaches in adults with chronic migraine. It's not for those with 14 or fewer headache days a month. It's the number one prescribed branded chronic migraine preventive treatment.
Narrator: Prescription Botox is injected by your doctor. Effects of Botox may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. Alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing speaking breathing, eye problems or muscle weakness can be signs of a life threatening condition. Patients with these conditions before injection are at highest risk. Side effects may include allergic reactions, neck and injection site pain, fatigue and headache. Allergic reactions can include rash, welts, asthma symptoms and dizziness. Don't receive Botox if there's a skin infection. Tell your doctor your medical history. Muscle or nerve conditions, including als, Lou Gehrig's disease, Myasthenia gravis or Lambert Eaton syndrome, and medications including botulinum toxins as these may increase the risk of serious side effects.
Narrator: Why wait? Ask your doctor. Visit botoxchronicmigraine.com or call 1-844botox to learn more.
John: Mark Kluger, welcome to the conversation today.
Mark Kluger: Thanks, John. Thanks for having me.
John: It is a pleasure to be with you. You're joining us from New Jersey. I'm south of Salt Lake City in Utah. And today we're going to be talking about performance issues within the workplace, various workplace dynamics related to that, and, and how we can leverage it to reduce employer liabilities and really just help everyone in the organization to thrive. As we get started, I wanted to share Mark's bio with everybody. Mark Kluger practices exclusively in the area of labor and employment law on behalf of employers for 10 years. Before founding Kluger Healy, LLC, he was chairman of the labor and employment department of one of New Jersey's oldest law firms. Mark is a frequent speaker and writer on sexual harassment and discrimination, AVO avoidance, workplace diversity, performance management, union avoidance, and a myriad of other employment related subjects, and regularly conducts training sessions for employers on these critical topics. In addition, Mark has extensive experience in counseling employers on his issues on issues involving discipline and discharge, reductions in force, mergers and acquisitions, compliance with wage and hour disability, COBRA and family medical leave laws. And there's a whole lot more I could share about Mark, but I'm going to pause there. Mark, anything you would like to highlight before we dive on into the conversation?
Mark Kluger: I think that's plenty, John. More than enough.
John: All right. You know, it's so fascinating. The employment and labor law, um, landscape is complicated, ever evolving, uh, some may say fraught, um, with challenges at the moment, uh, but it's also fascinating because it's always changing, um, and it's one of the most interesting areas of HR for me, uh, not because I want to always just have to focus on compliance issues, um, um, you know, but because it's just so central and foundational to so much of what we try to do. And I'm always a, I'M a believer in, like, let's get past compliance culture. Let's move towards commitment culture. Let's, like, hopefully we can create an environment where everyone wants to show up, do their work, do a great job. No, you know, it's a safe place. Nobody wants to harass each other. Nobody wants to treat each other badly. Like, it's just, you know, that's the ideal. The problem is we don't live in the ideal world and bad things happen. People do things they're not supposed to. Companies have to make sure that they're monitoring all of this. Uh, and so that's where you come in. That's where this whole field comes in. Um, why don't we, as we start out, uh, just frame up from your perspective, uh, how you look at performance management. Um, and I ask this in part because I know you can get different folks in the room and ask the same question and I think get slightly different, in some cases, wildly different kinds of responses from frontline managers, senior executives, an HR person, uh, uh, employment and labor law attorney. Um, so how do you kind of frame it up in your mind?
Mark Kluger: I see performance management as really, uh, there are two primary goals to it. One being the most important, which is to help employees thrive, be better at what they do and reach their potential. And the other, of course, as an employment lawyer, is, uh, as a defense mechanism to litigation avoidance. Meaning that, uh, it's critical to create a record of the efforts at performance management really for two sub reasons. One is to, uh, you know, really to have employees have something to look back at, um, in terms of, uh, expectations and articulate and articulated expectations. And really the second subpart of that is to create a defense so that in the event things go bad and there needs to be an exit strategy that. It's a well documented exit strategy that can be used to either, uh, you know, dissuade litigation, dissuade a lawyer not to take a case or to defend one if should one occur.
John: Yeah, and I can't. I'm sure you see this all the time, but I can't tell you how many times, uh, I've had this kind of a conversation, uh, some, some variation of the following conversation where, you know, a, uh, manager's like, I got to get rid of this person. They're terrible, they're toxic, they're. They don't perform, they're dragging down the team. And then, and then HR is like, okay, well let's. Let's look at their performance reviews and then they look at them. And it's like, exceeds expectations five years in a row. You know, something like that. And then, and then you're like, okay, what's the basis? You say, this employee is terrible, that they're toxic, that they're driving down the team. Yet none of that shows up in existing documentation, um, which is all positive. And then there's. There's no other corrective action documentation. There's nothing, uh, there's no basis. And at that point, you know, it's. It's kind of like, I know managers get upset and they're like, well, HR won't let me fire this bad person. I'm like, uh, it's kind of your fault because you didn't actually, like, do the normal stuff. Now, in an ideal world, again, coming back to ideals. And we're not always in an ideal world, but in an ideal world, a good manager and a good leader should be developing their people. And so when you notice a problem, if you notice bad behavior, or someone, uh, is not following policy or their just performance isn't up to par, you coach them and mentor them and get them the training and you help them. And a lot of times folks will improve. Like with. With good, uh, a good structured, uh, performance improvement plan and, you know, a genuine desire to help them improve. A lot of people want to do good at their jobs. Like, I don't know many people who wake up thinking, I just want to, like, skate by and do nothing, and I don't want to do well, you know, most people do. And so like, first of all, that manager who says, I want to get rid of this person, and all they have is exceeds expectations across the board, you know, they've never given their person a chance to improve, probably. Um, and from a liability standpoint, oh my goodness, like, you kind of have no basis. You know, if someone comes back at you with a, uh, discrimination charge, I mean, what, what are you going to say? You, all you have is positive documentation. You probably see that all the time.
Mark Kluger: Yeah, I mean, that's really how I got into doing performance management training is because I started reverse engineering all the things that went wrong in litigation. And they started with those performance reviews that you're talking about that say exceed expectations. And I started realizing that the reason that that happens is human nature. It's because if you approach, uh, performance management from a conflict, uh, avoidance standpoint, which is what most of us do as just natural, uh, you know, do you wake up in the morning and say, I want to have a confront with this employee today, and you Want, you know, it's just aggravating. Right. So people write the things that will avoid conflict and that's how they go about their performance management as well. What happens is in that conversation that you're talking about, that happens about I want to fire this person today. Those are always Friday at 5:00'.
Speaker C: Clock.
Speaker N: Right.
Mark Kluger: You can ask any management defense lawyer, they'll tell you, uh, employment lawyer, that is that they get calls like that and HR gets them too. Five o' clock on Friday because it's the employer or the manager is saying, I don't want to see this person Monday morning, you know, get them out of my life. And then as you said, we look at the documentation. To me, the framework that, and you use the word John mentor. Um, and that I think that's the missing link, right, is that managers think of themselves as the boss. And you know, performance management should be criticism as opposed to education, training, mentorship. And that's really the key to sort of turning the process around.
John: Yeah. And I really, truly am a believer that good managers, good leaders, you know, they're all about building up their team, developing their team, building their bench strength. Um, you know, and, and it's, and I know that that's hard. Like uh, you know, sometimes people say, oh, that's too soft, you have to be stronger, you have to be um, you know, more in people's faces to get them to perform or whatever. And I, I suppose it depends on the job, it depends on the industry, it depends on the type of people. Everyone's a little bit different. But generally speaking, uh, most people, you know, perform better and want to be part of a company and part of a job, part of a team. When they feel supported, when they feel encouraged, uh, when, when they feel like they have opportunities for growth and when they're, when their boss understands them and, and helps them to achieve their potential. Uh, that is the environment where most people tend to thrive the best. Uh, and so good leaders, you know your number one job, I mean, yes, you have to like meet your KPIs and you have to like make sure that you staff and you like all the kind of nitty gritty day to day stuff. But too many leaders get caught up in only the day to day stuff and putting out fires and they don't do the real work of leadership, which is building that team and that camaraderie and the culture and the support mechanisms around people to help them to achieve and to perform at their highest level. That is, you know, if you're looking at sports, it's easy to see that, right, like, of course that's what you want. Good, good, um, coaches, good managers to be able to, um. And yet when we get into the workplace, I think a lot of times those things are forgotten or people have, do have the best of intentions, they want to do that and then they just get caught up in the day to day grind and putting out fires and they feel like they never have time to do those things that they may even believe are the most important things. And then you just, you see this cycle over and over and over again, uh, of teams with dysfunction, um, leaders being frustrated because they're being held accountable for their team's performance and their team's not performing. So now, you know, it's kind of like, you know, a parent losing their temper with their kid because they didn't clean up their room again. And I'm like, you know, it's, yeah, sometimes it's frustrating because your kid doesn't clean up the room. But also, sometimes you got to step in and do provide some support or help them understand how they can keep their room clean or whatever. Like, I don't know, that's probably not a great example. But the point is like a great leader builds their team. That's like the number one thing that they do. You often get promoted because of your technical expertise because you're a top individual performer. Once you're in a leadership role though, it's not about that anymore. It's about leveraging the people on your team to drive performance. And it's quite a different skill set. And a lot of people really struggle despite what may be the best of intentions.
Speaker N: Right?
Mark Kluger: Well, because people, as you said, become managers because they're good at the job. That doesn't mean they know how to manage people. And that's, as you said, a completely different skill set. And I have found over time that, um, you know, some people just aren't cut out for it, obviously. And that is, you know, their boss's job to figure out whether they're capable of that. But I also think that a good leader and one who does performance management well, has to be introspective about, uh, their own expectations and whether they actually articulate them. I think we all have in our heads we know how to do the job. And intuitively they should know how to do the job because I know how to do the job. And they must know what I want because it's obvious what I want. And that's, you know, that's what people are too Often managers are too often not introspective about. Did I actually articulate for the employee what I expect of them? And the other thing that I found over time in doing performance management training is, um, it's important to recognize, you know, we learned, you know, when I went to school, probably when you went to school, the teacher stood in the front of the classroom. We all sat in rows, the teacher talked, we wrote it down, we listened. Right. Well, over time, education has evolved into, um, recognizing that people learn differently and that the style of teaching has, as a result, changed. Well, the same is true in the workplace. Not all of us learn the job skills the same way. And bosses have to understand that. Sometimes people need to see you demonstrated. Sometimes people need to see instructions in writing. Sometimes people need to see a video in order for it to sink in. And you can stand in front of the room and yell at the employee all day. If they're not getting it, they're not getting it. Maybe you need to try a different approach. I can tell you one. Anecdotally, I've done training in police departments, management training for, uh, police officers. And I had one cop who's a lieutenant or captain who stood up. And he was really, uh, great about this. He said, listen, I get that this is not the thing, but I grew up, um, in a family, military family. My dad was a marine. My grandfather was a Marine. I was a Marine. He said, I learned great when people yell at me, you know, m. He said, I know that's not what I'm supposed to do as. As, you know, as a leader, but I learned that way, you know, but he understood that he needed to adapt his style to those people who he commanded. And the same is true, really, at any level of management, is you got to be heard. And if you're not heard, it's really not worth communicating. So if you're not getting through to an employee, maybe you need to take a step back and say, am I approaching it correctly before we get into the exit strategy. But going back, John, all of that, all of those steps need to be documented so that we can demonstrate that we gave the employee a chance to succeed.
John: Yeah. Yeah, absolutely. And being able, as you mentioned, you know, being able to really articulate expectations, that sounds obvious. It's. It sounds like it might be easy. It's anything but. Um, and in part because, like you said, sometimes we're not introspective enough. Um, communication styles, whatever. Uh, it could be a whole variety of things. Um, but in my experience, most leaders just under Communicate. Um, they, they kind of just expect people to read their minds. Or like you said, they, they know how to do it. And so of course everyone else knows how to do it. Someone else. So when else someone else doesn't do it the right way, instead of it just being, oh, they don't know how to do it, it's like, oh, they, they're being lazy. They're on purpose not doing it the way they're supposed to. And again, yes. Are some people lazy? Yes. Do some people intentionally perform poorly or just don't care? They're apathetic, yes. Uh, but most people, you know, want to do a good job. And so to, like, start with the assumption, um, that they're an idiot or they're, you know, lazy or malicious in some way is just not helpful. And, and usually it comes back to you. You just didn't communicate enough. Um, and, or, you know, you. May I send an email? I send an email to everybody telling them what to do. I'm like, good for you. Like, sending an email. Do you read all your emails thoroughly and fully comprehend everything? Like, you have to usually repeat things over and over again. And I know that's annoying, but it's also just part of the deal. And it's part of, like, human nature. Like, we got to hear things multiple times, especially if it's a change, because our muscle memory, our habits will just take us towards what we used to do, even when our intention is to change it up. And so, yes, I think a lot of leaders just are not great communicators or not as much as they need to be. They fall into the trap of thinking, oh, I said it once in one meeting. And so therefore everyone should know. Or even if they didn't say it to this particular team, I said it to their boss in a meeting once. Therefore they should have trickled it down. And now people, you know, it's on them. Like, no, it's really not on them. Like, it's really on you. And so you just have to be super intentional. Um, I've also noticed, and it's a cultural thing, maybe it depends on different regions, different locations are different. Um, but people trying to be nice. Conflict avoidance can also lead to passive aggression, you know, and so people will sometimes be quite passive aggressive in how they're dealing with an employee that they see as a problem employee. Instead of being clear, instead of being direct, um, and then they scratch their heads and they get more and more upset and more and more, um, frustrated because the, you know, in their minds Are like, I said something to the person and they didn't do anything about it. And you ask the person, they're like, I don't. I never heard anything about it. Someone once vaguely said something, and it was kind of tangentially related in the mind of the manager, you know, they were clear in the mind of the person, there was no clarity. And that happens all the time, too. So the documentation, yes, it helps with the liability piece, and it helps organizations, um, avoid litigation and such, but it also just helps clarify expectations. Like, it just helps put it down in writing so everyone on both sides can really understand what's going on. You're not trying to read people's minds. You're not trying to, um, guess what people were thinking or try to have a perfect memory of how a conversation went weeks or months later. It's there. It's in writing now. You can refer back to it. And it's protection. It's protection for the employee, it's protection for the employer. And so we just need to be much better communicators when it comes to performance coaching, performance management, and trying to drive those types of more healthy cultures within a team.
Mark Kluger: Yeah. And that documentation is also critical because it has to serve as a reminder to the manager as well to keep revisiting the topic. Because you mentioned analogy to children. And it's, you know, I always think of it the same way that when. When a parent stops making something a priority, um, so what message does that send? And the same is true in managing an employee when. When a manager stops revisiting a topic, then, you know, I think implicitly, uh, employees stop thinking it's important. You know, maybe consciously or subconsciously, they haven't asked me about, you know, my. My timely filing of reports. So, you know, I'm going to, you know, maybe it's not important anymore. And I think that may be subliminal. But if. If a goal is set and it's not revisited several times throughout the year, that goal slips off.
Speaker N: The.
Mark Kluger: Slips out of the mind of the employee. Um, and so it's incumbent upon the manager to keep whatever those goals are, um, you know, at the forefront of the employee's mind and keep coming back to it. And, you know, and that's why we have evolved from, you know, the traditional annual performance review.
Speaker D: Yeah.
Mark Kluger: To much more frequent feedback as a methodology of ensuring, you know, top performance.
John: Yeah. Well, and it's also no wonder that people don't find kind of the traditional annual performance review helpful. Um, no wonder they're often inaccurate like exceeds expectations for every year for this person. That I think is terrible. Um, because in the traditional kind of annual review everyone gets slammed at the same time. Uh, and if you, especially if you have a lot of people on your team. And so it's like this big chore, everyone thinks it's dumb, everyone thinks it doesn't really work or do anything. Employees, um, don't like it, employers and the managers don't like it. And so inevitably what happens when that's the case? People start going through the motions, they start just filling stuff out.
Speaker N: Right.
John: And so of course no wonder you're going to have things that aren't particularly accurate or helpful or useful. Um, and so yes, the whole world of performance, uh, management has shifted dramatically. And I think everyone pretty much knows. I still see organizations that only do the annual. But um, for the most part everyone knows and has moved towards implementing more continuous feedback cycles. Um, and it can be formal, a combination of formal, informal, but you have to um, have more regular communication, more regular feedback cycles and then you have to do the work of documenting what happens in those. So even if it's an informal formal coaching or mentoring session with an employee, a good manager should then go back afterwards, summarize what happened in that meeting, maybe even send a follow up email to their employee saying hey, thanks for meeting with me, this is what we discussed, blah, blah, blah. Then you have documentation, you know, for it. And, and it can still be a fairly organic and informal kind of a setting so people don't feel all tense about it. Um, but just getting into the habit of, of doing that is going to help you be a better manager. You're going to know your people better. Um, but it'll help the organization a lot too and your, and your team
Mark Kluger: and you know, to go back to what we were talking about earlier about you know, uh, the, the performance reviews that said exceeds expectations, you know, I think I have seen, and again I think this is what drove me to do performance management training was those performance reviews, the annual ones that, that use those adjectives, you know, those traditional adjectives where the employer or the manager is sure that they gave a bad review. Why? Because they said satisfactory, which is like C. Right. If you think about A, B and C, D, you know, from, from school, right. Satisfactory, you know, is a conflict avoidance technique. Right? Because it's like if you give a fair or poor, you're going to have to explain yourself, right? So if you give satisfactory, okay, that's not good or excellent or exceeds expectations. So in their mind the manager is giving them a poor grade. But you take, uh, a 10 year employee with Satisfactory every year for 10 years and put them in front of a jury after they were fired and there's, and they're bringing an age discrimination case and the jury's going to look in the dictionary and see satisfactory means meeting expectations.
John: They did their job.
Mark Kluger: So how do, so how do you defend that case? Right. And so I, you know, so I've raged against the adjective form of reviews, even if it's M more often than annual, because, because the adjectives don't mean anything. And I try to drive managers to do narratives with examples and examples that you have to that are, you know, not just like what happened last week. Okay. And again, that's how performance management has evolved, as you said, to much more frequent feedback. But I think, you know, and I used to blame the millennials and now I thank the millennials for taking us there because they're the ones who said, why are you telling me in December something I did wrong in February? Doesn't that mean that I've been doing it wrong since February? And you just waited till December to tell me it didn't make sense? It still doesn't make sense. And so more immediate feedback is critical to really helping employees, uh, achieve what you expect of them. But also to. I always tell managers who say it's a ton of work that what you're asking me to do. And I always say, yes, but it's a lot better than you're blowing your top in November, December at the annual performance review when you're really frustrated and angry that they did not improve throughout the year.
John: And yes, it's a lot of work, but, you know, a little strategic work up front saves you a lot of time and effort and misery, potential misery later on. And it's your job. Like, that's literally your job. Um, yeah, like manage your team and manage performance. So, you know, I get it. It's. And that's. If it seems superficial, if it seems performative, yes, people are going to be upset about that. So do stuff that really matters, like, and it actually is going to have a chance of moving the needle. Then I think you'll get people more on board. Well, Mark, this has just been a fantastic conversation. I know at the time, and I need to let you go here in a minute, but before we wrap things up for today, I just wanted to give you a chance to share with audience how they can connect with you, find out more about your work, um, and then give us the final word for today?
Mark Kluger: Sure. Uh, John, thanks for having me. This has been a lot of fun. Um, I am reachable at, uh, mcklugerhealy m.com healy is H E a L e Y. Everyone always leaves off the last E. Um, we have a website, Kluger Healy. And I, uh, do a fair, uh, amount of this kind of training, John, because I have found it is the best way to help my clients avoid litigation problems is by getting ahead of it with having good performance management system.
John: Yeah, absolutely Mark. It has been a real pleasure. Encourage the audience to reach out to get connected. Find out more about what Mark can do for you. And as always, I hope everyone can stay healthy and safe. They can find meaning and purpose at work each and every day. And I hope you all have a great week.
Narrator: Thanks for joining us for this episode of the podcast.
John: We hope you stay healthy and safe
Narrator: and please join us again soon.
Speaker N: Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. I don't know if you knew this, but anyone can get the same Premium Wireless for $15 a month plan that I've been enjoying. It's not just for celebrities. So do like I did and have one of your assistant's assistants switch you to Mint Mobile today. I'm told it's super easy to do@mintmobile.com
Narrator: Switch upfront payment of $45 for three month plan equivalent to $15 per month required. Intro rate first three months only, then full price plan options available, taxes and fees extra. See full terms@mintmobile.com the right window treatments change everything.
Speaker O: Your sleep, your privacy, the way every room looks and feels. @blinds.com, we've spent 30 years making it surprisingly simple to get exactly what your home needs. We've covered over 25 million windows and have 50,000 five star reviews to prove we deliver. Whether you DIY it or want a pro to handle everything from measure to install, we have you covered. Real design professionals, free samples, zero pressure. Right now. Get up to 50% off with minimum purchase. Plus get a free professional measure. @blinds.com rules and restrictions apply.
Speaker P: I'm Glenn Washington, host of Snap Judgment, the award winning storytelling podcast from kqed. Every week Snap deals a new card. Like the girl whose sister was a monkey. Or the man who lived in the woods for 30 years. Or even the woman who snuck her lover out of prison in a dog crate. Pick a card, any card. Tap to listen now to Snap Judgment from KQED on Spotify.
Speaker D: Athletic Brewing Company crafts award winning non alcoholic beers for those who want to be part of every round. With over 185 flavor awards, they're exceptional NA beers that fit your lifestyle and any social occasion. Summer's full of good times, and Athletic fits right in. Go to athleticbrewing.com to have brews delivered to your door, or find them at a bar, restaurant, or store near you. Near Beer Athletic Brewing Co. Fit for all Times.
Speaker Q: The most memorable gifts aren't found, they're made. Zazzle is a custom marketplace where you pick any product, a mug, a card, a tote, a phone case and make it personal. A photo, a name, an inside joke. The kind of gift that actually fits the person. That's what 30 million customers have been coming back to Zazzle for over 20 years to find. Right now, save 25% on your first order@zazzle.com that's zazzle.com make it zamazing.
Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.