
Hosted by Campaign
Campaign's weekly award-winning podcast interrogates and analyses the biggest stories, campaigns and important issues in UK advertising, marketing and media. Presented by Campaign's editorial team. Read more at
405 episodes · publishes weekly · latest 2026-07-02 · ~29 min/episode
Rank
#4992
Substance
48.0
/ 100
Breakdown
Scored 2026-07
Updated monthly
Across the index
#4992 of 6186
Substance
Top 81%
outscores 19% of the index
The Campaign Podcast ranks #4992 on The B2B Podcast Index with a substance score of 48.0 out of 100, scored across 1 recent episode. It scores highest on specificity & evidence and guest caliber. The episode contains more concrete data than most of its type - exact trophy counts, year-on-year comparisons by category, and named agencies and campaigns - but all specifics relate to awards results rather than business or effectiveness outcomes, limiting their utility for operators.
Averaged across 1 recently scored episode, with cited evidence.
The episode is mostly event-atmosphere banter, anecdotes about lost voices, and surface-level awards recap. The few substantive points - Creative Effectiveness entries down over 50%, UK's specific trophy breakdown - are mentioned briefly and never analysed deeply enough to be actionable for an operator.
“really hot and sweaty. But think everybody was the same”
“It was quite obviously referential to uk”
No contrarian or first-principles thinking; the episode is a standard post-awards debrief with predictable takes (Christmas campaigns don't travel, AI is changing creativity, humor is back). The mild observation about Creative Effectiveness requiring too much proof work is the closest thing to a non-obvious claim.
“I guess the sense was, in a world where you have to prove a lot more than you did have to previously in the Creative Effectiveness category”
“humor is back in all its forms”
All four participants are Campaign magazine journalists and editors - knowledgeable trade observers but not practitioners who have built, run, or bought campaigns at scale. There are no CCOs, brand marketers, or strategists who made any of the winning work.
“creativity and Culture editor Gurget Deegan”
“deputy Creativity and Culture editor Charlotte Rawlings”
The episode contains more concrete data than most of its type - exact trophy counts, year-on-year comparisons by category, and named agencies and campaigns - but all specifics relate to awards results rather than business or effectiveness outcomes, limiting their utility for operators.
“last year the UK took home 86 trophies and this year it took home 84. However, it did double in Grand Prix”
“Industry craft. It had 18 shortlists last year and only one this year. Creative Effectiveness had 10 shortlists last year and zero this year”
Questions are consistently soft and open-ended ('how would you summarize your Cannes?'), follow-ups rarely press for deeper analysis, and a significant portion of airtime is spent on social banter rather than substance. No claims are challenged and no real tension is created.
“how was your can this year? How would you summarize?”
“Can I ask a quick question, actually?”
First period on the Index - history builds from here.
1 scored on substance · 60 tracked in total.
Add this badge to your site - it links back here and updates automatically as you rank.
<a href="https://index.fame.so/show/the-campaign-podcast" target="_blank" rel="noopener">
<img src="https://index.fame.so/badge/the-campaign-podcast/badge.svg" alt="Ranked #754 on The B2B Podcast Index" width="360" height="136" />
</a>Track The Campaign Podcast's rank
Get an email whenever this show moves up or down the Index. Monthly at most, no spam.
The themes that come up most across this show's episodes.
Podcasts that dig into the same topics.