The B2B Podcast Index
Index
All categories
MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
MethodologySubmit
Best of:MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
An independent project byFame
SearchBest episodesGuestsInsightsMethodologySubmit a podcast
Index/Marketing/The Analytics Power Hour
The Analytics Power Hour artwork

#298: Listener Questions Answered Live from Marketing Analytics Summit!

The Analytics Power Hour · 2026-05-26 · 52 min

0:00--:--

Key moments - from our scoring

Substance score

46 / 100

Five dimensions, 20 points each

Insight Density9 / 20
Originality9 / 20
Guest Caliber12 / 20
Specificity & Evidence6 / 20
Conversational Craft10 / 20

The Analytics Power Hour team - Michael Helbling (Stacked Analytics), Moee Kiss (Director of Data for Product at Canva), Tim Wilson (Head of Solutions at facts & feelings), and Val Kroll (Head of Delivery at facts & feelings) - tackle listener questions live from the Marketing Analytics Summit in Santa Barbara. The episode addresses three core challenges: how to position yourself as a strategic partner rather than an order-taker with stakeholders, practical and reliable use cases for AI in analytics work, and ethical boundaries around AI adoption in the industry. The panelists emphasize that partnership requires genuine curiosity about stakeholder challenges, preparation using available context (Slack, earnings calls, press releases), and accountability for recommendations - not just producing dashboards on request. On AI, they're pragmatically skeptical: Val finds value in pre-call research using AI to understand competitive landscape; Moee appreciates code assistance and productivity tasks; Tim cautions against using AI as a hammer looking for nails, valuing it most for debugging code and clarifying thinking; all express concern about AI replacing human collaboration and junior analyst development. For analytics leaders and practitioners navigating stakeholder relationships and AI integration, this conversation provides actionable perspective on balancing technology adoption with the relationship-building that drives actual business impact.

Key takeaways

  • →Being a true partner requires genuine curiosity and accountability for recommendations, not just delivering dashboards or reports on request.
  • →Data professionals should do prep work independently (reviewing Slack, emails, earnings calls) before asking time-constrained stakeholders for context rather than relying solely on discovery conversations.
  • →AI is most useful for specific tactical tasks like code debugging, thought clarification through prompt writing, and competitive research, not for replacing human judgment or automated insight generation.
  • →Meeting note automation can either increase laziness and reduce attention or provide accessibility benefits depending on how analysts use it alongside their own note-taking practices.
  • →The industry risks over-automating the collaborative and creative human elements of analytics work that are critical for junior analyst development and stakeholder relationships.

In this episode

  1. 1Becoming a Partner vs. Order Taker in Analytics
  2. 2AI Skepticism and Practical Use Cases
  3. 3ask.why.ai and Prism for GA4 Analysis
  4. 4Ethical Boundaries and Concerns with AI Implementation
  5. 5The Value of Human Attention in Meetings

Mentioned

Canvafacts & feelingsStacked AnalyticsMarketing Analytics Summitask.why.aiPrismGA4Michael HelblingMoee KissTim WilsonVal KrollJim Sterne

Guests

Moe KissTim WilsonVal KrollMichele KissJenn Kunz

Topics in this episode

Prompt engineeringAI skepticism and practical applicationsMeeting transcription and summarizationGA4 analysis workflowsCode debugging with AICompetitive intelligence researchJunior analyst trainingPartnership vs. order-taking dynamicsask-why.ai Prism connectorMarketing Analytics Summit

Questions this episode answers

How can analytics professionals become strategic partners instead of order-takers with stakeholders?

Show genuine curiosity about stakeholder challenges by doing prep work to understand their pressures and business context (via earnings calls, Slack channels, emails) before meetings, contribute your voice to conversations while taking accountability for recommendations, and focus on de-risking their decisions rather than jumping directly to data and solutioning.

What are the most reliable use cases for AI in analytics work?

Debugging code, clarifying your thinking through well-written prompts, assisting with administrative tasks (meeting summaries, Slack tone softening), and pre-call research like building competitive landscape tables - but not for autonomous insight generation or replacing human judgment in analysis.

What practices around AI adoption in analytics make industry leaders uncomfortable?

AI-generated meeting summaries that drive inattention and laziness in meetings, using AI to replace junior analyst development in areas like stakeholder communication and collaborative creativity, and positioning AI as the solution to problems it wasn't designed to solve rather than a tool to augment existing workflows.

Should data practitioners take notes during stakeholder meetings if they want to be seen as partners?

Taking notes itself isn't the issue - contributing your voice and being accountable for what you say is what positions you as a partner; the key distinction is whether you're passively recording information or actively engaging in the conversation while showing up prepared.

What our scoring noted

Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.

Insight Density

9 / 20

The episode has flashes of genuine insight - data folks avoiding accountability, fighting on the wrong turf when data trust breaks down, sending different signals up vs. down the org - but these are buried in substantial conversational meandering, repetitive AI hedging, and off-topic tangents. The insight-per-minute rate is low for a 52-minute episode.

the signal you send up doesn't have to be the same as the signal you send down, but you better be smart about how you do it and don't get caught
I think the thing that I just keep observing is data folks don't want to be accountable

Originality

9 / 20

Partner-vs-order-taker and AI skepticism are extremely well-worn themes in the analytics community; most takes here are familiar to anyone who has followed the space for a year. A few genuinely fresh angles appear - prompting AI teaches you to communicate context better with stakeholders, the anthropomorphization danger with LLMs - but they are the exception, not the rule.

when you're prompting and you're talking about something you need the AI to do for you and it totally misses the boat...Think about your poor stakeholder that you were not giving that context for how many years
I get very, very nervous when I have Vibe coded and yes, it brings results out. But I've now seen in the wild how that can go awry

Guest Caliber

12 / 20

The panelists are genuine senior practitioners - Moe Kiss as Director of Data for Product at Canva provides real in-house operator perspective, and the consultants (Wilson, Helbling, Kroll) have deep hands-on experience. Jim Sterne's presence adds historical credibility. No career thought-leaders, but the format dilutes individual depth.

Moe Kiss. Director of Data for Product, Canva.
I do sometimes and I'm obviously in-house, so it's quite different. I do find if I have a stakeholder like that, I will almost always have one-on-one time with them

Specificity & Evidence

6 / 20

Almost no hard data, named companies beyond the panelists' own employers, dollar figures, or concrete case studies appear in the episode. Answers are overwhelmingly opinion-based and abstract; the most specific element is a vague 'five hours a week' claim and a reference to using earnings calls for prospect research.

my team saved five hours a week. Here's all the dot points, send it up to leadership, move on with your life
we had been doing a lot of process effects and feelings very manually to kind of go through and listen to like most recent earnings calls or pulling out, you know, press releases

Conversational Craft

10 / 20

The live panel format produces some genuine pushback - Moe explicitly calling bullshit on Tim, Tim and Moe sparring on meeting notes - but Michael as de-facto host rarely drives sharp follow-up questions or pins anyone to specifics. Several audience questions are broad and answered with rambling non-answers that go unchallenged.

I kind of want to call a bit of bullshit on it though, because I do, I get what you're saying
You managed to answer that without giving this poor person any tips on how to do their job

Conversation analysis

Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.

Most-used words

wilson346michael249helbling245kiss238kroll138data36question34analytics24trying18sterne17notes17different17michele16first15saying15meeting15

Episode notes

Picture this: four analytics professionals, one live audience, a bunch of submitted questions, and absolutely no filter when it comes to sharing their real thoughts about AI, stakeholder management, and the state of the industry. That's what you get when the Analytics Power Hour goes live from Marketing Analytics Summit , with Michael, Moe, Tim, and Val fielding everything from, "How do I prove I'm a partner rather than just an order taker?" to "What's your icky threshold with AI?" The conversation ping-ponged from the fundamentals - like why curiosity beats feature checklists when selecting tools - to the controversial, including a heated debate about whether AI-generated meeting notes are helpful productivity boosters or lazy crutches that strip away human editorial judgment. Along the way, they tackled data trust issues, the pressure to show AI efficiency gains, and why trying to nail down the "best" deliverable will just trigger existential musings about what a deliverable even IS! Fair warning: Tim gets triggered by AI hype, Moe calls some industry BS, and everyone agrees that being useful beats being right.

Full transcript

52 min

Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.

[Announcer]: Welcome to the Analytics Power Hour. [Announcer]: Analytics topics covered conversationally and sometimes with explicit language. [Jim Sterne]: The Marketing Analytics Summit is pleased to present these four amazing podcasters. [Jim Sterne]: We have Michael, the self-effacing every-man consultant who knows far more than he lets [Jim Sterne]: on.

[Jim Sterne]: We have Moee, who flow all the way in from Sydney, Australia. [Jim Sterne]: She's the determined, driven practitioner, the one to stand up and say, well, that's [Jim Sterne]: all very well and good, but how do we actually make it work? [Jim Sterne]: There's Val, who co-founded the Consultancy facts & feelings, because we have strong [Jim Sterne]: feelings about our facts and no facts about our feelings. [Jim Sterne]: And there's this guy named Tim.

[Jim Sterne]: Ladies and gentlemen, take it away. [Michael Helbling]: Hi, everyone. [Michael Helbling]: Welcome to the Analytics Power Hour, this episode 298. [Michael Helbling]: And we are recording live at the Marketing Analytics Summit in the beautiful Santa Barbara.

[Michael Helbling]: You know, 21 years ago, my very first Analytics conference was right here in this city at [Michael Helbling]: this conference, formerly known as E-Metrics. [Michael Helbling]: And similar to today, it was a conference full of smart, engaging, and passionate people [Michael Helbling]: learning together about how to solve the problems they were facing day-to-day in the analytics [Michael Helbling]: industry. [Michael Helbling]: A lot has changed. [Michael Helbling]: A lot has changed.

[Michael Helbling]: But persistent through all of that is this beautiful analytics community. [Michael Helbling]: And the shared learning, this podcast was actually created to encourage and celebrate. [Michael Helbling]: So to that end, I have my co-hosts with me. [Michael Helbling]: And we have put out a survey to gather your questions.

[Michael Helbling]: We've been asking you during the conference. [Michael Helbling]: And so we have a number of them to get through, and we'll do our best to answer them from [Michael Helbling]: some of the perspectives we bring to the table in our various roles. [Michael Helbling]: So let me introduce them. [Michael Helbling]: Moee Kiss.

[Michael Helbling]: Hi, folks. [Michael Helbling]: Hi. [Michael Helbling]: Director of Data for Product, Canva. [Michael Helbling]: And of course, Tim Wilson, Head of Solutions at facts & feelings.

[Michael Helbling]: Hello. [Michael Helbling]: And Val Krull, Head of Delivery at facts & feelings. [Val Kroll]: Hello, hello. [Michael Helbling]: And I'm Michael Helbling, my president of Stacked Analytics.

[Michael Helbling]: Okay. [Michael Helbling]: What a privilege to be here with all of you in person. [Michael Helbling]: It's been a wonderful couple of days. [Michael Helbling]: So let's just dive right into it.

[Michael Helbling]: So we've got a question. [Michael Helbling]: This one came from James from Namer's Children's Health. [Michael Helbling]: What's the best approach to establishing yourself as a partner and not an order taker when working [Michael Helbling]: with stakeholders? [Val Kroll]: James is the one who has the most trouble with the uncomfortable pause.

[Val Kroll]: So that's why he looks the best. [Moe Kiss]: Oh, I assumed that was your cue. [Moe Kiss]: Anyway, we were having a conversation earlier about taking notes over lunch. [Moe Kiss]: And if you don't want to be perceived to be the person in the room taking notes, then [Moe Kiss]: don't take the notes.

[Moe Kiss]: And I think it's really jarred with me because I have this belief, I mean, I always know [Moe Kiss]: that I come back to everything that Cassie Kazarkoff says about just be useful. [Moe Kiss]: And I am sometimes fine. [Moe Kiss]: I'm still like, I might be the most senior person in the room and sometimes I do still [Moe Kiss]: take notes. [Moe Kiss]: Part of that's my brain, but part of that is also that I want to be useful and the people [Moe Kiss]: in the room are normally smarter than I am.

[Moe Kiss]: And I have much more interesting things to say. [Moe Kiss]: So I actually kind of struggle a little bit with the question in and of itself. [Moe Kiss]: I think one of the things that maybe means that it's OK to still take notes, but is also [Moe Kiss]: adding your voice to the conversation. [Michael Helbling]: I think, I don't know, I just, again, we were chatting about this at lunch.

[Moe Kiss]: When you don't contribute to the conversation, when you're not willing to be accountable [Moe Kiss]: for what you say, I think that's when you kind of, you're not the partner, so to speak. [Tim Wilson]: I mean, I think it's, I agree. [Michael Helbling]: I think it's don't be an order taker. [Tim Wilson]: I think to me it is, and there have been a lot of discussions at this conference, a [Tim Wilson]: lot of the discussion in the industry were at large around how are we using AI and there [Tim Wilson]: to be curmudgeonly and a little cranky about it.

[Tim Wilson]: But a lot of is, how do I take more orders? [Tim Wilson]: How do I take more orders and produce more output? [Tim Wilson]: And that misses, to me, the fundamental part of becoming more of a partner is to step into [Tim Wilson]: their shoes, ask the questions, write it down, be genuinely curious. [Tim Wilson]: Don't be trying to get to, how quickly can I turn this into a ticket?

[Tim Wilson]: And I think that has been, AI has nothing to do with that. [Tim Wilson]: That has been a 20-year problem in our industry when we sit around and wring our hands and [Tim Wilson]: gnash our teeth about why aren't we brought in. [Tim Wilson]: We produced the next dashboard like they asked us to, we gave them recommendations, but did [Tim Wilson]: you ever actually sit down up front and say, I just, I'm an analyst, I'm curious, I want [Tim Wilson]: to understand what you're grappling with.

[Tim Wilson]: And there have been, even at this conference, there have been some discussions around that. [Tim Wilson]: But I, I lay awake at night fretting about the industry being, I want to be a partner, [Tim Wilson]: but I behave like an order taker. [Tim Wilson]: And it's like, it's simple, just be curious, go ask them, get inside their heads and start [Tim Wilson]: asking them, how can I have some problems? [Michael Helbling]: Yeah, okay.

[Moe Kiss]: I kind of want to call a bit of bullshit on it though, because I do, I get- [Michael Helbling]: On brand? [Moe Kiss]: I get what you're saying, and I hadn't really thought about like AI driving more of the [Moe Kiss]: order taking. [Moe Kiss]: I actually feel like my experience might be a little bit different. [Moe Kiss]: I think the thing that I just keep observing is data folks don't want to be accountable.

[Moe Kiss]: I had this conversation at the back of the room earlier, it's like, they want to be like, [Moe Kiss]: here's the numbers, don't look at me, like I don't want to be on the hook for the recommendation [Moe Kiss]: that I'm making. [Moe Kiss]: And I don't know, I don't think that's an AI thing. [Moe Kiss]: I think that's just a, maybe it's a 20 year old industry thing. [Tim Wilson]: I think it is, I mean, I actually agree that it's like, we make recommendations and they're [Tim Wilson]: not following them.

[Tim Wilson]: And a lot of times like, where did this start? [Tim Wilson]: Well, we asked them what they, we asked them what their business question was. [Tim Wilson]: If you're asking them, even if you're saying, I'm asking what the business question is, [Tim Wilson]: there is a human element of saying, I am your partner, I am in this with you together. [Tim Wilson]: So I'm just pushing for moving upstream and not jumping to the data and jumping to the [Tim Wilson]: solutioning and jumping to, did I produce the published report that made a recommendation [Tim Wilson]: and then I'm upset.

[Michael Helbling]: So you didn't fix that? [Val Kroll]: Yeah, I'm just kidding. [Val Kroll]: I would say like to get started with that, it's not even always about like anticipating [Val Kroll]: all of their needs. [Val Kroll]: I think it is being curious and just thinking about the motivations and the stresses that [Val Kroll]: that person has in their role, like what pressures are they facing?

[Val Kroll]: And I think that this has come up a couple of times too about how do we de-risk the [Val Kroll]: decision that's upcoming for them or where should they spend that next dollar and do [Val Kroll]: a little bit of prep work before you walk into that room to show that you're trying [Val Kroll]: to empathize with what they're dealing with because their job is hard too. [Val Kroll]: It's very different than yours, but starting from that place, I think is a good way to [Val Kroll]: kind of say like, we're in this together, we're side by side, not sitting across the [Val Kroll]: table and I'm just going to push something on you at some point.

[Moe Kiss]: But I think the difference there is you talked about preparation and I think a lot of the [Moe Kiss]: curiosity can come without necessarily absorbing stakeholder time. [Moe Kiss]: And I worry sometimes that the push is like, oh, well, I haven't got enough context. [Moe Kiss]: My stakeholder is time poor. [Moe Kiss]: So, you know, that sort of thing where it's, I actually think there's a lot of personal [Moe Kiss]: responsibility that data folks need to take to be like, I have enough information available [Moe Kiss]: to me throughout various, various Slack channels, emails, et cetera, to have some of that curiosity [Moe Kiss]: before even asking the question of a stakeholder.

[Tim Wilson]: 100%. [Tim Wilson]: 1000%. [Tim Wilson]: I see your 100% and raise it. [Tim Wilson]: But I think if you're thinking about it, you should be saying, this is my understanding, [Tim Wilson]: but here's something that I can't.

[Tim Wilson]: I listened to our quarterly conference call and there was something that doesn't make [Tim Wilson]: sense to me. [Tim Wilson]: I tried to figure it out. [Tim Wilson]: It doesn't. [Tim Wilson]: I think you, marketing manager, might help me explain this because I can't square that [Tim Wilson]: circle.

[Tim Wilson]: So, yes, showing up and that certainly worked with analysts who say, well, what are my lists [Tim Wilson]: of discovery questions? [Tim Wilson]: What is your most challenging business problem? [Tim Wilson]: If that's the way you show up, they're going to be like, I have to explain every minute. [Moe Kiss]: 25-year-old data slanted slightly because that's kind of how they show up sometimes.

[Moe Kiss]: No age. [Michael Helbling]: No age. [Michael Helbling]: All right. [Moe Kiss]: We're going to move to our next question.

[Moe Kiss]: This is the whole episode. [Michael Helbling]: Sorry. [Michael Helbling]: And this is coming from a member who's here in the audience, Michelle Kiss. [Michael Helbling]: Whoo.

[Tim Wilson]: Any relation? [Michele Kiss]: None. [Michele Kiss]: Completely the same person. [Michele Kiss]: Complete coincidence.

[Michele Kiss]: Yes. [Michele Kiss]: Confuses everybody. [Michele Kiss]: Okay. [Michele Kiss]: So, first of all, my question has two parts.

[Michele Kiss]: There's a pre-question that is required for setting the context. [Tim Wilson]: Yes, they're related. [Michele Kiss]: And so that we can interpret your answer. [Michele Kiss]: Okay.

[Michele Kiss]: So, first of all, the pre-question is where do you guys stand on AI? [Michele Kiss]: Are you a skeptic or a fan? [Michele Kiss]: Okay. [Michele Kiss]: So, that's the context.

[Michele Kiss]: Then, what things have you personally found that it is useful for and reliable for? [Michele Kiss]: It has to be life. [Val Kroll]: Okay. [Michael Helbling]: I'll go first.

[Val Kroll]: So, I would say that I'm a skeptic, but that's just kind of like my nature. [Val Kroll]: I don't think there's anything new or special about that. [Val Kroll]: That's just kind of who I am as a person, but I'm excited at the same time. [Val Kroll]: And I think I've been inspired by a lot of the conversations we've been having over [Val Kroll]: the past couple of days that have gotten my wheels turning about some different things [Val Kroll]: that I can try when I get back to my desk.

[Val Kroll]: So, I would say more on the skeptic, but still excited, still optimistic. [Val Kroll]: I don't think, you know, world's ending just yet. [Val Kroll]: One of the things that I have been playing around, this is recency bias, but just thinking [Val Kroll]: about how do I start at like day 60, day 90 with the where I'm at with an understanding [Val Kroll]: of the business context for a potential prospect conversation. [Val Kroll]: And so, we had been doing a lot of process effects and feelings very manually to kind [Val Kroll]: of go through and listen to like most recent earnings calls or pulling out, you know, press [Val Kroll]: releases or seeing what was publicly available just to kind of understand what is the context, [Val Kroll]: what is the competitive nature, where are they competing and using AI and building out [Val Kroll]: some gems to build that out for me.

[Val Kroll]: And so, I'm asking it to give me some tables and comparisons of where do they compete on [Val Kroll]: what message is? [Val Kroll]: Is this about pricing? [Val Kroll]: Is this about quality? [Val Kroll]: And so, really trying to figure out like how do I get into that context so that I'm not [Val Kroll]: asking like question number one, what are your goals?

[Val Kroll]: It's like, let me start with something because then I'm going to be able to ask much richer, [Val Kroll]: deeper conversations. [Val Kroll]: And so, again, recency bias, but that's been the most fun one just to kind of understand [Val Kroll]: outside of an analysis, what's something I can do to show up in those conversations [Val Kroll]: to kind of position myself to be a better partner. [Moe Kiss]: Mine are not sexy. [Moe Kiss]: Like I don't...

[Moe Kiss]: That wasn't sexy. [Moe Kiss]: Build me a table of your competitors. [Moe Kiss]: Well, it depends what you think is sexy. [Moe Kiss]: Yeah, I mean, I do a lot of leadership-y things and those things tend to be quite admin-y.

[Moe Kiss]: I do think the one... [Moe Kiss]: Oh, I forgot your first part of the question. [Moe Kiss]: I'm excited and terrified. [Moe Kiss]: I would say I'm...

[Moe Kiss]: I don't... [Moe Kiss]: Fan feels like a strong word. [Moe Kiss]: I do like a lot of the potential and the personal gains in the way that it's changed how I work, [Moe Kiss]: but I have this like level of fear, which I think is pretty rational and normal. [Michael Helbling]: It's a pretty big shift.

[Moe Kiss]: And yeah, a lot of the ways I use it are not sexy. [Moe Kiss]: But I do think the thing that has been really nice for me personally is feeling like code [Moe Kiss]: is not so far away. [Moe Kiss]: Like it's been a couple of years since I wrote code very regularly, and there are things [Moe Kiss]: that now I feel much more comfortable. [Moe Kiss]: I'll go do a quick Here's the Queer I Want to Vibe code something.

[Michael Helbling]: And I also know enough to know if it's not correct, which is important, but it makes [Moe Kiss]: it feel like more approachable to a skill that's pretty rusty. [Moe Kiss]: The rest of the stuff is like making my snarky comments in Slack, seem less snarky, like [Moe Kiss]: meeting summaries. [Moe Kiss]: Like, yeah, it's not sexy. [Tim Wilson]: So I'll say I'm a skeptic and a fan.

[Tim Wilson]: So I'll punt on the first question. [Tim Wilson]: My skepticism comes from I've been developing this observation that I feel like we are [Tim Wilson]: as analysts, we are often saying this is the thing the tool can do. [Tim Wilson]: This is my hammer. [Tim Wilson]: So now I'm going to go figure out what the nail is, and I'm going to tell myself that [Tim Wilson]: the nail is going to solve a problem that has nothing to do with the technology.

[Tim Wilson]: So I have found it to be very useful on debugging code, kind of piggybacking off [Tim Wilson]: of what you said, because coming from having written code, debugging it. [Tim Wilson]: It is very, very useful. [Tim Wilson]: I get very, very nervous when I have Vibe coded and yes, it brings results out. [Tim Wilson]: But I've now seen in the wild how that can go awry.

[Tim Wilson]: I actually find that it's very useful just from a thought clarity. [Tim Wilson]: And I think that hasn't changed. [Tim Wilson]: That probably took me three times listening to Jim Stern, give various [Tim Wilson]: presentations about writing prompts for it to take. [Tim Wilson]: And it was the first time I heard it now, kind of everybody saying it of some [Tim Wilson]: of the keys with writing prompts, but prompts, I think by writing.

[Tim Wilson]: So saying this forces me to organize my thoughts and then I'm going to trust [Tim Wilson]: and verify what comes back. [Tim Wilson]: That is much more on the help me clarify my thinking, because if you're helping [Tim Wilson]: me clarify my thinking, just like a human being who I think, no, that's wrong. [Tim Wilson]: That's bullshit. [Tim Wilson]: You can challenge me, but you may be wrong.

[Tim Wilson]: I am not, and which wasn't the, where is it? [Tim Wilson]: Not useful, but I, anytime it's like, it's going to basically do glorified [Tim Wilson]: anomaly detection and spit out insights. [Tim Wilson]: Yeah, I'll go to the mat for a while on that. [Tim Wilson]: And I'm pretty triggered with various claims to have it do that.

[Tim Wilson]: Michael, what happens after you finish a GA4 analysis? [Michael Helbling]: Oh, traditionally, I guess I paste screenshots into a doc, rename it final, [Michael Helbling]: final, uh, you know, do not change final, uh, lose the source query and then wait [Michael Helbling]: for somebody to ask, can we break this down by campaign? [Michael Helbling]: Terrifying. [Michael Helbling]: Please stop.

[Michael Helbling]: I would love to emotionally and professionally. [Tim Wilson]: Well, that's why ask dash, why.ai just released the Prism Cod co-work connector. [Tim Wilson]: It brings the whole Prism brain to your GA4 big query data.

[Tim Wilson]: Ooh, the whole brain analytics, agent harness, skills, memory engine, the works. [Michael Helbling]: Wow. [Michael Helbling]: So co-work doesn't just answer questions. [Michael Helbling]: It remembers context, uses repeatable skills, keeps analysis [Tim Wilson]: organized, exactly.

[Tim Wilson]: You're, you're picking it up. [Tim Wilson]: Your co-work based analyses are accessible in Prism, organized, traceable, [Tim Wilson]: auditable, and ready to use with your other data sets. [Michael Helbling]: I love that. [Michael Helbling]: Cause currently my audit trail is mostly like, oh, I know I had a reason for doing [Michael Helbling]: that.

[Michael Helbling]: I can't remember what it is. [Tim Wilson]: That checks out. [Tim Wilson]: The connector also ships with ready to run funnel and cohort skills right out of [Tim Wilson]: the box. [Michael Helbling]: So I can ask for retention by acquisition channel and not immediately enter a [Michael Helbling]: fugue state.

[Tim Wilson]: Right. [Tim Wilson]: And every analysis becomes a shareable page. [Tim Wilson]: Prism auto-generates the dashboard page right from co-work. [Tim Wilson]: Oh, so the answer doesn't die in a chat thread.

[Tim Wilson]: That's right. [Tim Wilson]: It lives as a reusable and shareable analysis. [Tim Wilson]: Well, that's very rude to my old workflow, but fair. [Tim Wilson]: We'll go to ask dash, why.

ai. [Tim Wilson]: That's ask dash the letter y.ai and sign up for the wait list. [Tim Wilson]: Yeah.

[Michael Helbling]: And use code APH and that'll get you pushed to the top of that wait list. [Michael Helbling]: Ask dash, why.ai code APH. [Michael Helbling]: I like it.

[Michael Helbling]: Co-work. [Michael Helbling]: It's GA for analysis, but with receipts, which was not part of the question. [Val Kroll]: We're only on our second question. [Val Kroll]: You can't, you can't get triggered yet.

[Tim Wilson]: No, I welcome it. [Tim Wilson]: I was triggered 36 hours ago. [Michael Helbling]: I think it's okay. [Michael Helbling]: I go through life triggered.

[Michael Helbling]: All right. [Michael Helbling]: We have another question from someone here in the audience. [Michael Helbling]: So I'll hand it off to Jen Coons. [Jenn Kunz]: It actually follows up with what Tim was just saying, perhaps a bit of it.

[Jenn Kunz]: Do any of the ways we promote and use AI in the industry make you feel icky? [Jenn Kunz]: Do you have a threshold of lines that you don't want to cross when it comes to AI? [Tim Wilson]: Can I add, I'll add a new one to that. [Tim Wilson]: I am not a fan of the note takers in meetings and doing the summaries, [Tim Wilson]: which I know is super controversial just inside.

[Tim Wilson]: And because to me, I've watched and I've watched this time and time again, [Tim Wilson]: how much that drives laziness and not paying attention in the meeting [Tim Wilson]: and not editorializing. [Tim Wilson]: And it is flat summaries. [Tim Wilson]: I've worked with some clients where they have literally said, oh, [Tim Wilson]: you weren't at the meeting, we recorded it. [Tim Wilson]: Here's the Gemini summary.

[Tim Wilson]: And it's just not useful because it's not telling me what the human beings [Tim Wilson]: in the room were thinking about. [Tim Wilson]: Let me throw one other, I'll be quick. [Tim Wilson]: Because, Jim, when you did your closing note, you know, yesterday, [Tim Wilson]: which was very good, not going to be too useful for people who were listening [Tim Wilson]: to this, but there was a lot of talk about using AI to ramp up junior analysts [Tim Wilson]: and build lots of different, use different tools that kind of let them kind [Tim Wilson]: of do self study.

[Tim Wilson]: And I wound up wondering about where do we teach the junior analysts, [Tim Wilson]: how to actually relate with people and have the creative, collaborative process. [Tim Wilson]: And so there's something there, too, that makes me nervous that we're [Tim Wilson]: at a conference right now, like are we on some logical trajectory where we [Tim Wilson]: think we're all just going to sit at home and just have AI do everything [Tim Wilson]: that needs to happen. [Tim Wilson]: There is a very, very real part of this job that is human and communication [Tim Wilson]: and collaborative creativity.

[Tim Wilson]: And I get very nervous that people are not recognizing the value of that [Tim Wilson]: and trying to have AI replace it. [Tim Wilson]: That was really deep. [Moe Kiss]: I was going to talk about meeting notes. [Tim Wilson]: Go for it.

[Tim Wilson]: Do I need to move away? [Moe Kiss]: No, but so for me, I actually find the meeting notes summaries incredibly [Moe Kiss]: useful. And the biggest thing for me is, like, as someone who self-declared [Tim Wilson]: has ADHD, can you square the meeting notes with the taking notes by hand? [Moe Kiss]: I do.

So I do still often also take notes. [Moe Kiss]: But the taking notes for me is me, number one, it helps me pay attention [Moe Kiss]: in the meeting. And number two, it helps me retain the informations. [Moe Kiss]: Like if we're talking about especially something complex, I won't necessarily [Moe Kiss]: fully hear it.

And then the next day, I sometimes do look at my own notes. [Moe Kiss]: I won't necessarily look at the notes. [Moe Kiss]: But what I find useful is the next steps. [Moe Kiss]: There is always like, no, when you are trying to corral like 20 people, [Michael Helbling]: you can be like, what is the big deal?

[Moe Kiss]: What is it? Why is that the big deal? [Val Kroll]: Tim, just fell off the stage for those of you listening. [Val Kroll]: That was a red fox impersonation for anyone who walks.

[Moe Kiss]: It's like, this person's going to follow up with this. [Moe Kiss]: By then this person's going to follow up with it. [Tim Wilson]: And because it's actually fucking terrible at that, it just goes through [Tim Wilson]: and says, this is what it was. [Tim Wilson]: And you need the human editorial person saying, [Tim Wilson]: what are the real next steps?

[Tim Wilson]: That's where it's trying to go through a discussion. [Moe Kiss]: To get back to the question, though, of what makes me feel [Moe Kiss]: ick, what makes me feel ick is things being shared [Moe Kiss]: that have not been properly vetted and QA and meeting notes [Moe Kiss]: fall into that category just as much as analysis or write up does. [Moe Kiss]: Like that's a bit that I get stressed about. [Moe Kiss]: Is it analysts are like, yes, I can pump out more stuff.

[Moe Kiss]: I'm going to automate this report. I'll send it out. [Moe Kiss]: I'm never even going to look at it. [Moe Kiss]: And I'm like, oh, that feels uncomfortable.

[Tim Wilson]: But isn't the meeting notes is asking people to do a lot [Tim Wilson]: because they're like, I got to get the meeting notes out promptly. [Tim Wilson]: And it takes an enormous amount of diligence to say, [Tim Wilson]: I am truly going to read through these and modify and write my own little summary and write. [Tim Wilson]: So it's like, you can paint the picture, [Tim Wilson]: but watching what actually happens with the people I've worked with, [Tim Wilson]: all of a sudden I'm like, oh, this was just barfed out.

[Tim Wilson]: And I'm sure they scan through it and I'm sure they told themselves, [Tim Wilson]: yeah, that seems about right to be fair. [Moe Kiss]: I just take the like the here are the action items. [Moe Kiss]: I don't send the whole summary. [Moe Kiss]: Is that worse or better?

[Tim Wilson]: I well, if you take them and you say, yeah, that looks about right. [Tim Wilson]: I think that's a problem because I think there is much more often. [Tim Wilson]: There is the person who's sending those out [Tim Wilson]: should have a responsibility to say these are the things that really need to happen. [Tim Wilson]: There's a level of prioritization and wording and body language [Tim Wilson]: and and adding net new stuff that I know that Joe said that Joe was going to do this.

[Tim Wilson]: But the reality is I know in our organization that Joe is going to have Mary work with him on this [Tim Wilson]: and putting that sort there, there is something in that maybe I'll get off that. [Moe Kiss]: There's a lot of nods, so I'm interested to hear more Tim. [Moe Kiss]: Normally, I don't have this kind of live feedback that suggests maybe you're right. [Michael Helbling]: That they're agreeing with me.

[Michael Helbling]: I think I'd go in a little different direction, [Michael Helbling]: which is I get sort of this icky feeling or there's a threshold. [Michael Helbling]: I don't want to cross with AI in terms of relating to it. [Michael Helbling]: And what I mean by that is some of the LLM big companies put out research [Michael Helbling]: where they kind of take what the LLM is doing and equate it to emotion [Michael Helbling]: and telling you that basically if you behave around your AI a certain way, [Michael Helbling]: it may actually impact its performance and that's sort of what they're seeing.

[Michael Helbling]: And I think it's a really dangerous thing and I think it's also tricky to talk about [Michael Helbling]: because I don't want to advocate for being mean to your AI or whatever. [Michael Helbling]: But as humans, we anthropomorphize things really a lot. [Michael Helbling]: And so I think we very easily buy into this idea that I make my AI feel bad [Michael Helbling]: if I yell at it or I make it feel good if I tell it does a good job. [Michael Helbling]: But in reality, it feels nothing.

[Michael Helbling]: And most importantly is human to human interactions. [Michael Helbling]: I modify them a great deal based on what I know of that person [Michael Helbling]: and the empathy and the intuition I'm getting from that conversation. [Tim Wilson]: So if someone's struggling, I modify empathy and modifying Tim's going to need a definition of hang in there, [Michael Helbling]: and so you adjust to that person like if you're giving feedback, for instance, [Michael Helbling]: whereas if I'm giving feedback to an AI, I want to be as direct and succinct as possible [Michael Helbling]: without having to kind of couch it in a phraseology or terminology [Michael Helbling]: that keeps it secure in its own quote unquote emotions, which are not real.

[Michael Helbling]: And so for me, that's sort of a weird line that I think I'd love for us to avoid [Michael Helbling]: as we approach AGI. [Moe Kiss]: Can I ask a crowd question? [Moe Kiss]: Only if you can figure out how to get a mic to them. [Moe Kiss]: No, I was going to make you count the hands for a rough estimate.

[Moe Kiss]: Well, if you each take one and we take the average of each of your estimates, [Moe Kiss]: maybe we'll have a decent score. [Moe Kiss]: OK, creating an agent based on your stakeholder one, stakeholder two, stakeholder three, [Moe Kiss]: so that you can tailor your comms and have a persona built out for each of it. [Moe Kiss]: Like, I want to know how we feel about the ick factor of like, is that icky or is it thoughtful? [Moe Kiss]: Because anyway, I can finish my thoughts afterwards.

[Tim Wilson]: Sam Bert, would you like to answer that question? [Tim Wilson]: There was a whole session on that. [Michael Helbling]: So here's my take on that, because I learned about that yesterday in a session [Michael Helbling]: and I actually really quite liked it, because I look at AI as a tool to take [Michael Helbling]: information and position it in the best possible way for the audience that you're [Michael Helbling]: presenting it to, much like you would present maybe a slide deck to one person [Michael Helbling]: and a narrative to another based on how they consume or prefer data or information to be consumed.

[Moe Kiss]: Two notes. Just to be clear, I'm not picking on Sam. [Moe Kiss]: That was like very persona based. [Moe Kiss]: I'm talking about like someone in your team creates one that's like, this is Moee.

[Moe Kiss]: This is how she receives information, like very personalized. [Moe Kiss]: I think that's a bit different. [Tim Wilson]: So I think and I think there's two aspects. [Tim Wilson]: So I think Sam's and yours.

[Tim Wilson]: One, I think if it actually forces the person who's creating it, this is where we [Tim Wilson]: to actually really think about like to create it, you have to think about what do I need to? [Tim Wilson]: What do I know about Moee? [Tim Wilson]: What have I seen about Moee? [Tim Wilson]: Can I ask Moee something?

[Moe Kiss]: So that's like, but do you think that they would or do you think they would just be like, [Moe Kiss]: I'm going to upload 50,000 conversations, a bunch of Zoom transcripts, whatever of [Moe Kiss]: interactions with this person and you tell me what you think they're going to like. [Tim Wilson]: I think that's going to be less effective. [Moe Kiss]: Yeah, it would probably would be. [Tim Wilson]: And then the second part of that, I completely lost what my other thought was.

[Tim Wilson]: So on Brent. [Michael Helbling]: Well, a lot of these questions are tailored around a bunch of information. [Michael Helbling]: I uploaded about you three. [Michael Helbling]: No, I'm just kidding.

[Michael Helbling]: OK, we have another question coming from someone who's unfortunately not here. [Michael Helbling]: Joe Domoleschi, if you were stripped of your fancies tech stack and could only provide [Michael Helbling]: one specific deliverable to a stakeholder to prove the value of marketing analytics, [Michael Helbling]: what would it be? [Michael Helbling]: Live dashboard, a PDF report, a slide deck, a meeting with actionable insights, etc. [Michael Helbling]: What would you do?

[Val Kroll]: So one specific deliverable to prove the value of marketing analytics, [Michael Helbling]: just to clarify, that's what it says. [Michael Helbling]: Yeah, OK. [Val Kroll]: The results of an A.B.

[Michael Helbling]: test. So Format can be anything. [Val Kroll]: I mean, well, he said deliverable. [Val Kroll]: OK, so I would I would do a presentation, tight narrative results of an A.

B. [Val Kroll]: test. That would be my that's my no explanation. [Tim Wilson]: I think my not might not be a prove, but might be to convince or define.

[Tim Wilson]: I would probably go to some sort of compelling story that I was comfortable. [Tim Wilson]: I might have pulled data from various sources. [Tim Wilson]: I might have run an A.B.

[Tim Wilson]: test, but I would actually tell a really strong narrative and maybe with slides. [Tim Wilson]: Maybe not. I think that would actually be more convincing. [Val Kroll]: Like, why does said deliverable, that's your constraint.

[Moe Kiss]: But see, OK, this is the difference when I heard deliverable. [Moe Kiss]: I was like, it can be anything. [Moe Kiss]: And it sounds like you've both interpreted that in like agency [Moe Kiss]: consulting land very different to me, because I would have said [Moe Kiss]: if I could pick anything, it would be an MMM. [Moe Kiss]: Like, I can talk about that for weeks and months.

[Moe Kiss]: I mean, at some point, it becomes valid. [Moe Kiss]: But it would probably be an MMM. [Moe Kiss]: Like, I'd love to go through an experimentation tool, [Moe Kiss]: but I feel like that maybe is not in the spirit of the question. [Tim Wilson]: I don't know.

Yeah. [Tim Wilson]: What is it? What is a deliverable? [Michael Helbling]: We could get that was not the question.

[Tim Wilson]: No, it's what is the deliverable is. [Tim Wilson]: So now I found sound like a consultant. [Tim Wilson]: But I mean, on an MMM being super compelling, [Tim Wilson]: and I'm sitting like 15 feet from Jim Janolio. [Tim Wilson]: So and having heard him talk like you can you can conduct a great MMM.

[Tim Wilson]: You can you can build it and then you can deliver it horribly [Tim Wilson]: and doesn't show anything or you can communicate it really, really effectively. [Tim Wilson]: So it is kind of what is a deliverable [Tim Wilson]: and how effectively is it created and delivered? [Moe Kiss]: Or we could just combine all three and then we'd like be winning. [Moe Kiss]: If we're perfect, you didn't answer yourself.

[Michael Helbling]: I'm going to ask the next question. [Michael Helbling]: From a member of our audience, Bryce Preslicka. [Michael Helbling]: Preslicka. Preslicka.

[Brice Praslicka]: All right. [Brice Praslicka]: So I have a client that had some major data issues previously. [Brice Praslicka]: Once we got on to the project, we've cleaned things up. [Brice Praslicka]: We're in a much better state now.

[Brice Praslicka]: The problem is one of the clients, [Brice Praslicka]: POC's continues to act as though we have unreliable data. [Brice Praslicka]: And even worse, we have a member of our team that continues to use words [Brice Praslicka]: like discrepancy and lack of trust and keeps using words [Brice Praslicka]: that don't really help us accurately convey that it's reliable now. [Michael Helbling]: So I've sent memos. [Brice Praslicka]: I have tried to coach them to not use certain words, [Brice Praslicka]: but with both an internal team and a client that don't trust data [Brice Praslicka]: that is in much better spot now, how would you go about trying to regain trust?

[Val Kroll]: In the role of the client you're supporting, [Val Kroll]: are they on the business side or are they in an analytics role? [Tim Wilson]: They're in the business side. [Tim Wilson]: Well, now you have to provide an answer because he was just clear. [Tim Wilson]: So here, I'll kick us off.

[Michael Helbling]: There's no time for cash measures. [Michael Helbling]: Jeez, we're in a world of AI now and we need to move quick. [Michael Helbling]: First thing first, stop inviting the internal person to the meetings. [Michael Helbling]: So they can't screw you up.

[Michael Helbling]: Second, take charge of those meetings and tell the client [Michael Helbling]: that you know what you're talking about. [Michael Helbling]: And it's time to make decisions and get off the pot. [Michael Helbling]: What are they afraid of? [Michael Helbling]: No, I don't know if I could pull that one off.

[Michael Helbling]: But but, you know, start to form the communication [Michael Helbling]: and put it into the positive realm so you get past that moment. [Tim Wilson]: I I mean, this is going to sound easier than it is in practice. [Tim Wilson]: But to me, one of the things that AI has not helped [Tim Wilson]: we have struggled with for for 25 years is businesses [Tim Wilson]: that are looking for certainty and precision when there is actually [Tim Wilson]: they're operating under conditions of uncertainty.

[Tim Wilson]: And Jen Kunze's presentation yesterday, like it's like people think that, [Tim Wilson]: oh, the data, the data was never complete. [Tim Wilson]: The data was never perfect. [Tim Wilson]: It's really no better, no worse. [Tim Wilson]: We can always point to stuff that's not working.

[Tim Wilson]: So that like so to me, once you're having the discussion about is the data right? [Tim Wilson]: You're losing if you're using discrepancy. [Tim Wilson]: If it's, you know what? Hey, can we reset?

[Tim Wilson]: Can we really nail down the one or the two or the three biggest decisions [Tim Wilson]: you're trying to make? Don't worry about the data. [Tim Wilson]: Forget about the data. [Tim Wilson]: Yeah, it's going to be involved at some point.

[Tim Wilson]: I think a lot of times what happens, if you can really get them saying, [Michael Helbling]: what I really want to know is, is meta delivering results? [Tim Wilson]: And they're like, can't you keep crunching the data from meta? [Tim Wilson]: But I know there are gaps. [Tim Wilson]: Instead, you may say, really, let me talk to you about what a geo lift test is.

[Tim Wilson]: So it kind of goes back to that order taker versus partner. [Tim Wilson]: And it's it's tough. [Tim Wilson]: They're still working with you. [Tim Wilson]: So they have some level of trust.

[Tim Wilson]: But I think we wind up fighting the fighting on the wrong ground. [Tim Wilson]: We were on the ground of like, no, but the data is good enough. [Tim Wilson]: Well, no, but this and go, I know it's an asterisk and don't use this word. [Tim Wilson]: It's like, instead of like, we so quickly lose sight of it's such a [Tim Wilson]: tangible thing to point to that the data has a problem.

[Tim Wilson]: And we forget to say, what's the what do we really want to know [Tim Wilson]: and try to elevate that conversation? [Tim Wilson]: I often I think it's like, that's actually not the right data set for it. [Tim Wilson]: Anyway, we keep chasing the wrong data set to most answer that question. [Val Kroll]: I like that a lot.

[Val Kroll]: And the one point that you mentioned that I just expand upon is I think [Val Kroll]: the really rooting yourself in like, what level of certainty [Val Kroll]: is really required to answer this question? [Val Kroll]: How much time do I have to turn this around? [Val Kroll]: Is it something you need tomorrow? [Val Kroll]: Do I have a couple of months before you're going to make this call [Val Kroll]: and really just trying to line up the various different methodologies [Val Kroll]: that are at your disposal to bring that to bear to bring the right evidence [Val Kroll]: to that question?

[Val Kroll]: You know, Paula's presentation, like merging those different sources [Val Kroll]: of evidence to really kind of paint that picture. [Val Kroll]: I think can like shake people loose from like focusing on, you know, [Val Kroll]: what percentage of, you know, people are opting out from whatever cookie [Val Kroll]: banners and things like that, right? [Val Kroll]: So I think like just not trying to play on that, like move the battle, [Val Kroll]: I guess, not play on that turf and kind of say, hey, like let's just focus [Val Kroll]: on like Tim was saying, like those top those top questions [Val Kroll]: that you're really grappling with.

[Val Kroll]: And let's think about how much business risk we really be introducing [Val Kroll]: if it wouldn't be perfect. [Val Kroll]: So like, let's think about the various ways we can kind of go about it. [Val Kroll]: And sometimes just injecting a little creativity, if you will, [Val Kroll]: into the methodologies, into that conversation can kind of get them [Val Kroll]: excited about some different ways. [Val Kroll]: Maybe it's a user test.

[Val Kroll]: Maybe it's, you know, it's not going to be something [Val Kroll]: we're going to look for in a table as an example. [Tim Wilson]: So be sure to record the meeting and send them the meeting summary. [Tim Wilson]: Oh, for fuck's sake. [Moe Kiss]: I actually stayed very quiet on that one because this is an area [Moe Kiss]: I think Tim generally is normally right in.

[Moe Kiss]: Wait, why is everybody shaking their head now? [Moe Kiss]: But I do sometimes and I'm obviously in-house, so it's quite different. [Moe Kiss]: I do find if I have a stakeholder like that, [Moe Kiss]: I will almost always have one-on-one time with them. [Moe Kiss]: And I'll normally have some questions around like, [Moe Kiss]: what would have to be true for us to use this data source [Michael Helbling]: or, you know, are there other data sources [Moe Kiss]: that we could use to supplement the information [Moe Kiss]: so you'd be comfortable enough making a decision with what we have?

[Moe Kiss]: Like kind of trying to tackle it almost one-on-one, [Moe Kiss]: because especially soon as you get in a meeting with a bunch of people [Moe Kiss]: and everyone's like, oh, well, this data's wrong. [Moe Kiss]: So, you know, we're all stuck here [Moe Kiss]: and then everyone whinges about it for the rest of the meeting. [Moe Kiss]: It like it stops being productive. [Moe Kiss]: And so I would almost be trying to like really partner with that, [Moe Kiss]: like the biggest doubter of the group especially [Michael Helbling]: and build up that relationship and really work with them on [Moe Kiss]: some of the methods that Tim and Val are talking about here [Moe Kiss]: so that then they can also become your advocate, hopefully, over time.

[Michael Helbling]: Excellent. All right. [Michael Helbling]: Here's another question we got. [Michael Helbling]: Everyone at my company is being tasked [Michael Helbling]: with showing specific efficiency improvements [Michael Helbling]: they've delivered using AI.

[Michael Helbling]: I'm an analyst who supports marketing. [Michael Helbling]: What are some ideas you have that I could do for that? [Michael Helbling]: Don't make me do the Hollywood Squares one again. [Tim Wilson]: I just feel like this.

[Tim Wilson]: I'm starting to feel like we've beaten this particular horse. [Michael Helbling]: What do you mean, AI or efficiencies? [Tim Wilson]: Well, well, yeah, I mean, the AI piece and the big, [Tim Wilson]: I guess the my my qualm with the efficiencies [Tim Wilson]: and I totally recognize the person asking the question. [Tim Wilson]: They don't have control over that.

[Tim Wilson]: That's being pushed down and it's an organizational challenge. [Tim Wilson]: But efficiency is like producing more with the same [Tim Wilson]: or producing more with the less or producing the same with the less whatever. [Tim Wilson]: And it's like more what and and moving down the path of saying, [Tim Wilson]: well, we're we're producing more dashboards faster. [Tim Wilson]: We're responding to requests faster [Tim Wilson]: and everybody feels resource constrained [Tim Wilson]: and like we can't hire we can't double our headcount.

[Tim Wilson]: So AI is going to help us keep it fixed. [Tim Wilson]: And I think this is where I'm feeling like I'm beating a dead horse [Tim Wilson]: and I am the dead horse. I don't know that that has this idea that if we [Tim Wilson]: its volume, volume is the issue that we just need to generate more. [Michael Helbling]: But that volume of whatever we're producing is going to someone.

[Tim Wilson]: Like there's there's value in the friction, [Tim Wilson]: which does not make me an AI skeptic. [Tim Wilson]: I just think the efficiency part is really, really tricky. [Tim Wilson]: You know, I think I've seen that in articles [Tim Wilson]: that that's happening across a lot of companies are saying, [Tim Wilson]: we're just trying to make this as a actually Jim talking on, [Tim Wilson]: I think day one was showing like this is just a chase for headcount reduction [Tim Wilson]: and something's not right there.

[Michael Helbling]: So you you managed to answer that without giving this poor person any tips [Michael Helbling]: on how to do their job. [Val Kroll]: They should have been a marketing analytics woman. [Val Kroll]: Yeah, that's right. [Michael Helbling]: There's a lot of tips there.

[Moe Kiss]: Can I jump in, though? [Michael Helbling]: He helps. [Moe Kiss]: I learned this recently and I'm still kind of reconciling it. [Moe Kiss]: So I'm going to obviously tell a bunch of people the exact advice I got.

[Moe Kiss]: And we can all try it out, report back to me. [Moe Kiss]: Uh, I got some advice recently, essentially, like sometimes [Moe Kiss]: you just suck it up and you do it and a lot of conversations around [Moe Kiss]: AI at the moment are about productivity gains, not quality gains. [Moe Kiss]: And I find that just it gives me the ick. [Moe Kiss]: However, there comes a point where sometimes you're in a position [Moe Kiss]: and you just suck it up and you do it and you go, oh, my God, [Moe Kiss]: my team saved five hours a week.

[Moe Kiss]: Here's all the dot points, send it up to leadership, move on with your life. [Moe Kiss]: And then you get your team together and say, OK, let's have a conversation [Moe Kiss]: about how we improve the quality of our work. [Moe Kiss]: That's what matters here. [Moe Kiss]: So sometimes the signal you send up doesn't have to be the same [Moe Kiss]: as the signal you send down, but you better be smart about how you do it [Moe Kiss]: and don't get caught.

[Tim Wilson]: But you're setting yourself up to actually send a better signal up [Tim Wilson]: down the road, right? [Tim Wilson]: So I love that for doing both. [Moe Kiss]: Yes, obviously, team that was the grand plan. [Tim Wilson]: Check the box, but then separately say, but here's the real value we got.

[Tim Wilson]: And yeah, yeah. [Michael Helbling]: And we've been battling a problem like this since forever. [Michael Helbling]: I mean, there used to be a time in our industry when we thought [Michael Helbling]: if we collected every single piece of data, we would somehow magically know more. [Michael Helbling]: And it sort of is a redux of a similar way of thinking.

[Michael Helbling]: And so we have to kind of manage through it effectively. [Michael Helbling]: All right, we've got another question, and this one comes from also [Michael Helbling]: someone in the audience, Sam Burge. [Tim Wilson]: I think Michael surprised himself and didn't realize he should have [Tim Wilson]: already been on the move. [Michael Helbling]: So we'll fix that in post.

[Sam Burge]: How do you think analytics teams will look differently from today with AI? [Tim Wilson]: In the future. [Tim Wilson]: I mean, I I hope that on the one hand, they are still spark, curious, [Tim Wilson]: business thinking, technical kind of have a broad set of skills. [Tim Wilson]: So I don't think the teams will necessarily look a whole lot different.

[Michael Helbling]: How they work, they're obviously going to get, I guess, efficiencies [Tim Wilson]: and changing ways of working and become more prepared. [Michael Helbling]: But that's a tough one. [Tim Wilson]: Why did I jump in and answer that? [Michael Helbling]: I don't think I had a good I was just buying time for one of you guys [Tim Wilson]: to say something smart.

[Moe Kiss]: I don't know about. [Moe Kiss]: OK, this is my guesstimate. [Michael Helbling]: Yeah. [Michael Helbling]: And this is what I'm observing within my own team.

[Moe Kiss]: It seems like folks are kind of splitting a little bit. [Moe Kiss]: There are the folks that are going much more technical. [Moe Kiss]: I would almost, to some degree, even a little bit more specialized. [Moe Kiss]: And then there are the folks that it feels like the chasm [Moe Kiss]: between the technical and more the like business facing [Moe Kiss]: generalist is getting a little bit wider.

[Moe Kiss]: I don't necessarily see that as a bad thing. [Moe Kiss]: I think when folks have a particular strength in one direction, [Michael Helbling]: like we should encourage that. [Moe Kiss]: And that's a great thing. [Moe Kiss]: I do think it makes it harder for like teams [Moe Kiss]: and how they work together and all of that sort of stuff.

[Moe Kiss]: I had a massive rant a little earlier today [Moe Kiss]: because I am sick of reading very shitty, long documents [Moe Kiss]: which were based on someone's shower thought [Moe Kiss]: that never should have left the shower, [Moe Kiss]: but now is in a four thousand word document [Moe Kiss]: and being flung around our organization. [Moe Kiss]: And then someone else comes in and writes 50 comments on it. [Moe Kiss]: And then someone's like, over to you now, Moee. [Moe Kiss]: And I'm like, what do you want me to do with this?

[Moe Kiss]: I am now doing all of the thinking work of having to read it. [Moe Kiss]: And it's pretty like watery garbage, [Moe Kiss]: having to like respond, [Moe Kiss]: also trying to figure out what you want me to do with this [Moe Kiss]: because it was a shower thought bubble. [Moe Kiss]: And what my hope of where we get to [Moe Kiss]: is that it actually helps us think more critically, not less. [Moe Kiss]: I think we're in the shitty stage right now.

[Moe Kiss]: I'm optimistic. [Moe Kiss]: I'm going to bitch about the shitty stage we're in right now [Moe Kiss]: because it is shit, reading all these documents. [Moe Kiss]: But I am optimistic that with time it will help us [Moe Kiss]: think better about what we do. [Moe Kiss]: Like, I don't know, you're creating a hypothesis, [Moe Kiss]: like instead of having to tap your co-worker, [Moe Kiss]: you can like sense check, [Moe Kiss]: have I got all the key components that I need to have [Moe Kiss]: a really strong hypothesis for this experiment?

[Tim Wilson]: No, I think even like knowledge management, the ability [Tim Wilson]: because AI is helping so much with unstructured data, [Tim Wilson]: the calling through what has happened in the past. [Tim Wilson]: But it feels like it is an elevated role [Tim Wilson]: for what a great analyst should be doing five years ago [Tim Wilson]: is still the same, which is being deeply embedded [Tim Wilson]: in the business context and the business needs. [Tim Wilson]: It's been historically very hard to get the historical [Tim Wilson]: what have we done.

[Tim Wilson]: So I think some of those like the preparation, [Tim Wilson]: the pulling this together, using the tools, [Tim Wilson]: but I don't think it should change from what I think [Tim Wilson]: great analysts are doing, [Tim Wilson]: which is still having a deep connection to the business. [Tim Wilson]: It's a shifting kind of tool set. [Moe Kiss]: Can I just also add, Sam, [Moe Kiss]: one of the things I actually loved about your presentation [Moe Kiss]: was the idea also that we can change the format [Moe Kiss]: very quickly to suit different types of people.

[Moe Kiss]: Like I am an audio person. [Moe Kiss]: I would absolutely listen to a podcast on business metrics. [Tim Wilson]: I just remembered at the second point [Tim Wilson]: I was going to make back on that question. [Michael Helbling]: All right, fine.

[Moe Kiss]: Was this like from 10 minutes ago or? [Moe Kiss]: It was, but it was on that. [Tim Wilson]: It was asking, trying to figure out the best way [Tim Wilson]: that's what somebody would, how to respond to them. [Tim Wilson]: So when you said the audio person, [Tim Wilson]: how often do people actually know themselves?

[Tim Wilson]: So for all the listeners or anyone who wasn't in Sam's session, [Tim Wilson]: it was the, you know, there's the marketing person who says, [Tim Wilson]: I just want to have my cup of coffee [Tim Wilson]: and listen to the podcast. [Tim Wilson]: And there's a little trigger in me that thinks [Tim Wilson]: sometimes we seldom really know ourselves. [Tim Wilson]: So differentiating between somebody who thinks [Tim Wilson]: that's what they would want [Michael Helbling]: and someone who actually that would be effective.

[Tim Wilson]: And that had rang true [Tim Wilson]: from what we've dealt with for a hundred years. [Tim Wilson]: We've had people saying, I just need a dashboard that does X [Tim Wilson]: and we deliver them the exact dashboard. [Tim Wilson]: And they're like, this isn't helpful. [Tim Wilson]: Where's this other thing?

[Tim Wilson]: So there's this other layer [Tim Wilson]: that I think analysts historically have needed to follow. [Tim Wilson]: And the same thing opening up [Tim Wilson]: all these different formats is great. [Tim Wilson]: But what somebody says would work. [Tim Wilson]: And I think you have to deliver it to them.

[Tim Wilson]: But figuring out like, does that actually work? [Tim Wilson]: And giving them the opening, if they said, [Tim Wilson]: oh, I thought that would be really cool. [Tim Wilson]: And you tweaked and tuned the tone [Tim Wilson]: and the content and everything, [Tim Wilson]: but giving them the out to say, [Tim Wilson]: you know what that actually didn't work. [Tim Wilson]: I don't know that I wouldn't have known [Tim Wilson]: it wasn't gonna work until I actually tried it for a while, [Tim Wilson]: which we have not done in the industry very well forever.

[Tim Wilson]: We get in sort of a whiny mode of saying, [Tim Wilson]: we've given them all these dashboards [Tim Wilson]: and they're not using them. [Tim Wilson]: And it becomes this adversarial thing because, [Tim Wilson]: and then if we ask them, don't you want these dashboards? [Tim Wilson]: Well, they ask for them. [Tim Wilson]: Of course they're gonna say, yeah, yeah, yeah, [Tim Wilson]: this is really useful.

[Tim Wilson]: We haven't figured out how to say, [Tim Wilson]: no, that mechanism didn't work and it's okay. [Tim Wilson]: And we need to have the trust [Tim Wilson]: and we need to try something different. [Tim Wilson]: So we can go back and that was my other point. [Tim Wilson]: Maybe we should let, I'll get a word in and twice.

[Val Kroll]: Back to how do we think teams will change? [Val Kroll]: I think that there's gonna be some new muscles [Val Kroll]: that are built. [Val Kroll]: I think one of the things that we had been talking about [Val Kroll]: this conference is how this has given us [Val Kroll]: a lot of energy and excitement. [Val Kroll]: And I think that there's been some creativity injected, [Val Kroll]: which I think is just fun.

[Val Kroll]: Even if we're just talking about little things [Val Kroll]: that we do on the side that's not ready for prod, [Val Kroll]: but it's just kind of like stretching us [Val Kroll]: in some new ways, which I really appreciate. [Val Kroll]: The other thing that we were also talking with you about, [Val Kroll]: Sam or you and I were chatting about, [Michael Helbling]: is the communication skills [Val Kroll]: and how that's gonna be improving. [Val Kroll]: Because I think how often have you been in a conversation, [Val Kroll]: even over the past couple of days, [Val Kroll]: perhaps where people are just ragging on their stakeholders, [Val Kroll]: like, oh, they're so dumb, they just don't get it, right?

[Val Kroll]: And it's like, when you're prompting [Val Kroll]: and you're talking about something you need the AI [Val Kroll]: to do for you and it totally misses the boat, [Val Kroll]: and you're like, oh, geez, [Val Kroll]: I've totally forgot to give you this piece of context. [Val Kroll]: Of course you didn't understand what I was trying to say. [Val Kroll]: Think about your poor stakeholder [Val Kroll]: that you were not giving that context [Val Kroll]: for how many years.

[Val Kroll]: The video of, we were talking about this, [Val Kroll]: the dad with his son and daughter [Val Kroll]: about making the peanut butter and jelly sandwich, [Val Kroll]: about like, take the bread out of the bag [Val Kroll]: and he's like trying to, [Val Kroll]: and he like ends up like putting the knife [Val Kroll]: through the whole loaf of bread, whatever, [Val Kroll]: because he was just trying to follow the directions. [Val Kroll]: But I think it can help us build a little empathy [Val Kroll]: for our stakeholders, [Val Kroll]: because like, they're not wired the same way we are, [Val Kroll]: they don't have the same background that we do.

[Val Kroll]: And so I think it's one of the byproducts [Val Kroll]: that will help us become better communicators [Val Kroll]: and hopefully have a little bit more empathy [Val Kroll]: for people who don't make all the immediate connections [Michael Helbling]: that our brains do just because we're nerds. [Michael Helbling]: I think organizationally, [Michael Helbling]: I think we'll see departments flatten out a little bit. [Michael Helbling]: Like over the last 15 years, [Michael Helbling]: we've become super specialized [Michael Helbling]: in a lot of different disciplines, [Michael Helbling]: because analytics is actually multidisciplinary.

[Michael Helbling]: And I think AI will push that back together a little [Michael Helbling]: in a lot of organizations. [Michael Helbling]: And then those organizations over time [Michael Helbling]: will start to realize there's still a need [Michael Helbling]: for some of that specialization on the fringes, [Michael Helbling]: and they'll find ways to bring it back in. [Michael Helbling]: But I think we'll all express experience, [Michael Helbling]: some compression where an analyst will go back [Michael Helbling]: to being able to code something [Michael Helbling]: and also write a data pipeline [Michael Helbling]: and also go access the data lake [Michael Helbling]: and also build a dashboard and a great visualization.

[Michael Helbling]: And those were all things that like analytics people [Michael Helbling]: were attempting to do 15, 17 years ago. [Michael Helbling]: And then we realized we needed specialization. [Michael Helbling]: We needed a data engineer. [Michael Helbling]: We needed analytics engineer.

[Michael Helbling]: We needed a data visualization expert. [Michael Helbling]: And I think we'll begin to flatten those out with AI. [Moe Kiss]: That doesn't worry me a bit though. [Michael Helbling]: I don't say it's good or bad.

[Michael Helbling]: I just think that's what will happen. [Moe Kiss]: Like I feel like sometimes folks are over indexing [Moe Kiss]: on the generalization at the moment [Moe Kiss]: and thinking that, I don't know, [Moe Kiss]: a product manager can do a data scientist job, [Moe Kiss]: and I mean, some product managers [Moe Kiss]: is doing engineering jobs. [Moe Kiss]: Also interesting choices. [Moe Kiss]: So I think we're over indexing [Moe Kiss]: on the fact that folks can generalize.

[Moe Kiss]: And I heard there's a like- [Michael Helbling]: Outcomes follow expertise, even with AI. [Michael Helbling]: Okay, we have time for one more question. [Michael Helbling]: And that's our last question. [Michael Helbling]: And we have someone who is an audience member [Michael Helbling]: who's going to ask it and it's Jim Stern.

[Michael Helbling]: My question is, what are the first three skills [Jim Sterne]: that analysts have mastered [Jim Sterne]: that are going to be successfully taken over [Jim Sterne]: by artificial intelligence? [Val Kroll]: I wish we could get a question about AI. [Val Kroll]: No shade, Jim. [Val Kroll]: Just looking at Michael.

[Val Kroll]: First three skills, say it again. [Val Kroll]: First three skills. [Val Kroll]: Sorry, I was being an asshole. [Val Kroll]: First three skills.

[Michael Helbling]: What are Tim's favorite skills? [Michael Helbling]: So, probably like the, what is it? [Michael Helbling]: The ink to data ratio. [Michael Helbling]: So that probably going to be the first thing AI takes over.

[Val Kroll]: Data pixel ratio. [Val Kroll]: Data pixel ratio. [Michael Helbling]: I was paying attention, Tim. [Michael Helbling]: SQL, I don't write SQL anymore.

[Tim Wilson]: I am so much more on the debugging SQL debugging R. [Tim Wilson]: I think debugging coming over really, really quickly. [Tim Wilson]: I think a second one would be [Tim Wilson]: QA'ing or validating or vetting the results of an analysis, [Tim Wilson]: having that the thing that you're supposed to go [Tim Wilson]: to another analyst or try to come at it a separate way. [Tim Wilson]: I'm not sure what the third one is.

[Tim Wilson]: I think it's a lot of things that are going to be [Tim Wilson]: supplemental that we should be doing. [Tim Wilson]: Like not doing the QA, but giving me the list of, [Tim Wilson]: check my logic. [Tim Wilson]: Check the things that I, [Tim Wilson]: so maybe it's not what the junior analyst is doing. [Tim Wilson]: I think it's what the junior analyst ideally is working [Tim Wilson]: with another junior analyst or senior analyst [Tim Wilson]: to look over and review.

[Tim Wilson]: There's not a whole lot that I see [Tim Wilson]: a whole hard, whole hog hand in the keys over on. [Michael Helbling]: I came up with three, [Michael Helbling]: but I don't know if they fit the criteria. [Michael Helbling]: We'll have to go from there, [Michael Helbling]: but that's going to be where we have to wrap up. [Michael Helbling]: And I want to say first, a huge thank you.

[Michael Helbling]: To Jim Stern for organizing the marketing analytics summit. [Michael Helbling]: 45 years. [Michael Helbling]: And save your applause because also to all of you [Michael Helbling]: for being here and bringing your energy [Michael Helbling]: and your questions, your insights and experiences [Michael Helbling]: in a world changing daily with AI, it's the people, [Michael Helbling]: the community and human connection in our industry. [Michael Helbling]: It feels all that much more special and crucial [Michael Helbling]: in these changing times.

[Michael Helbling]: And obviously there's a huge audience also listening [Michael Helbling]: and we'd love to hear from you too. [Michael Helbling]: And you can reach us at our LinkedIn page [Michael Helbling]: or the measure slack chat group [Michael Helbling]: or by email at contact at analyticshour.io. [Michael Helbling]: Please leave comments, ratings and reviews [Michael Helbling]: on whatever platform you use to listen.

[Michael Helbling]: We do read all of them. [Michael Helbling]: And Tim brings them up in meetings. [Michael Helbling]: And I think- [Moe Kiss]: It makes us set KPIs. [Michael Helbling]: Yeah, it's terrible.

[Michael Helbling]: I can't wait till AI replaces that. [Michael Helbling]: All right, and I know that I speak [Michael Helbling]: for all of my co-hosts, Val, Tim, Moe. [Michael Helbling]: When I say, no matter the question or challenge [Michael Helbling]: you're currently solving, keep analyzing. [Announcer]: Thanks for listening.

[Announcer]: Let's keep the conversation going with your comments, [Announcer]: suggestions and questions on Twitter at analyticshour, [Announcer]: on the web at analyticshour.io, our LinkedIn group [Announcer]: and the measure chat slack group. [Announcer]: Music for the podcast by Josh Crowhurst. [Charles Barkley]: Those smart guys want to fit in.

[Charles Barkley]: So they made up a term called analytics. [Charles Barkley]: Analytics don't work. [Charles Barkley]: Do the analytics say go for it [Charles Barkley]: no matter who's going for it? [Charles Barkley]: So if you and I were on the field, [Charles Barkley]: the analytics say go for it.

[Charles Barkley]: It's the stupidest, laziest, lamest thing [Charles Barkley]: I've ever heard for reasoning in competition. [Jim Sterne]: Ladies and gentlemen, that is so much fun. [Jim Sterne]: Thank you so much for be adding the spark [Jim Sterne]: to the end of the marketing analytics summit. [Jim Sterne]: You guys are awesome.

[Tim Wilson]: Rock flag and AI gives me the ick. [Jenn Kunz]: Yeah. [Michael Helbling]: Yeah. [Michael Helbling]: Yeah.

[Michael Helbling]: Yeah. [Michael Helbling]: Yeah. [Michael Helbling]: Yeah. [Michael Helbling]: Yeah.

[Michael Helbling]: Yeah. [Michael Helbling]: Yeah. [Michael Helbling]: Yeah. [Michael Helbling]: Yeah.

[Michael Helbling]: Yeah.

Related episodes across the Index

Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.

  • Why B2B Brands Are Using AI to Write Sales ProposalsThe Growth Operator with Fexingo · on Prompt engineering85 / 100
  • Episode 018: Season 2, the $75 Consult and the Frankenstein StackAI Tools for Practicing Lawyers · on Prompt engineering84 / 100
  • Episode 7: AI & the Power of a "Thin Core"Architecting the AI Enterprise · on Prompt engineering82 / 100
  • How B2B Marketers Use AI to Personalize at Scale for EnterpriseB2B Marketing with Fexingo · on Prompt engineering82 / 100
  • 477. The Nitty Gritty of AI From an Attorney and AI Expert with Mike BrownThe Game Changing Attorney Podcast with Michael Mogill · on Prompt engineering81 / 100
  • The Hidden Risk in AI-Generated Tests and Requirements - Olivier DenooSoftware Testing Unleashed · on Prompt engineering79 / 100

More from The Analytics Power Hour

All episodes →
  • #303: Funnels Assume Progress. Barriers Recognize Reality.86 / 100
  • #300: Are Semantic Layers Really Necessary?68 / 100
  • #299: AI Can (Help) Build the Dashboard. It Can't Build the Buy-In.66 / 100
  • #297: Durable Wisdom in an Age of AI Slop66 / 100
  • #296: Avoiding Major Oopsies: Twyman's Law, Intuition, and Valuing Accuracy Over Precision75 / 100
Explore the best B2B Marketing podcasts →
All The Analytics Power Hour episodes →