Land and Lead · 2025-12-03 · 30 min
Key moments - from our scoring
Substance score
58 / 100
Five dimensions, 20 points each
Liz Harr spent 12 years at Hinge before stepping into the managing partner role two years ago, leading a pivot in how the boutique professional services marketing agency operates. Hinge works with mid-market firms caught between large incumbents and small freelancers, teaching them sustainable growth strategies. When Harr and her peer managing partners took over, they recognized the previous model concentrated nearly all decisions at the partner level, limiting both efficiency and emerging leadership development. They restructured around distinct lanes of responsibility, moved the organization from obsessive short-term KPI tracking to quarterly reporting and annual incentive programs, and systematically communicated Hinge's mission so teams could align their work to long-term goals. This shift forced difficult trade-offs - particularly around "gray hair advisory," the high-expertise client counsel that's most valuable but time-intensive - requiring delegation and empowerment of non-partner staff. The moves yielded measurable wins: resurrected their Visible Expert Podcast, relaunched a weekly newsletter now generating client feedback, and created space for partners to focus on strategic work. Harr candidly assesses herself at 75% mastery of the role pre-AI and now ~25%, viewing the AI opportunity as exposing weak links in workflow efficiency rather than a setback.
They moved from a model where most decisions concentrated at the partner level to a five-person managing partner group, each with distinct lanes of responsibility (e.g., client services, research, operations) while remaining collectively accountable for overall performance. This honors existing strengths while creating space for focused expertise and emerging leaders.
They moved from week-to-week KPI obsession to monthly operational reporting and quarterly performance dashboards, while restructuring employee incentives from monthly to annual metrics. This aligned reporting cadence with stated strategy and relieved pressure on teams to chase short-term fluctuations.
Leadership started with macro-level mission conversations (who we are, why we exist, what value we deliver), then moved to micro team discussions where employees articulated their own thinking on how they'd contribute to the mission and what KPIs they should own, rather than top-down assignment.
The retirement of co-founder Lee Fredrickson created a gap in "gray hair advisory" - the high-expertise, time-intensive counsel most valuable to clients. This forced the managing partners to delegate operational work and empower non-partner staff to provide client leadership and free up partner time for advisory work.
She felt 75% mastered before AI but now rates herself ~25%, viewing AI not as a setback but as evidence that existing processes have weak links where workflow efficiency could improve; her role is to identify those weak links and apply AI solutions strategically rather than comprehensively.
Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.
The episode contains some useful management concepts (long-term vs. short-term focus, empowering teams, clarifying mission) but relies heavily on general leadership platitudes and lacks specific operational details. The insights about shifting from weekly to quarterly KPI reviews and restructuring incentive programs from monthly to annual are concrete, but most advice is abstract and familiar to experienced operators.
when a team knows the mission, they can move mountains
we shifted that to monthly. But on a reporting we really look at quarterly because we understand the ebb and flow and week to week you're just going to have these fluctuations
The thinking is competent but largely derivative. The distinction between 'business builders' and 'business climbers' is borrowed from Dan Adams, the framing around empowerment and authenticity in leadership is standard, and the core advice about not being a bulldozer and hiring people smarter than you are well-worn leadership tropes. Little contrarian or first-principles thinking emerges.
Business builders and business climbers. He advocates be a builder, not a climber
if you are constantly the smartest person in the room, as the leader, you have failed big time
Liz Harr is a legitimate operator with 12 years at a functional business and 2 years managing a real company facing genuine scaling challenges. She has founded a tech company, navigated a market collapse, and is now running a professional services firm. However, her primary role is as a marketing/branding consultant rather than a direct operator building a product or service company at scale, which limits caliber for a general B2B audience.
I co founded a tech firm
I grew it and got it through the uh, 0708 market collapse
The episode is light on concrete data and specific examples. Liz mentions the High Growth Study, the Visible Expert Podcast, her weekly newsletter, and shifting incentive programs from monthly to annual performance metrics - but provides no numbers, financial metrics, or detailed case studies. Most claims about team changes and cultural shifts lack supporting metrics or timelines.
we restructured our incentive program so it's based on annual performance
I regularly hear from people who are finding value in it and it's resonating with them
Host Josh Elmore asks some reasonable follow-up questions and shows genuine curiosity, but rarely pushes back or probe for deeper specifics. When Liz makes broad claims (e.g., about AI reducing her sense of mastery from 75% to 25%), he accepts them without challenge. The conversation reads more like a friendly interview than a rigorous exploration of leadership challenges.
Yeah, I love it. And
Yeah, yeah, super powerful
Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.
In this episode of the Land and Lead podcast, Dr. Josh Elmore interviews Liz Harr, managing partner at Hinge, who shares her unconventional journey into leadership and marketing. Liz discusses the unique structure of Hinge, emphasizing the importance of empathy in leadership and the need for effective decision-making. The conversation explores the shift from short-term to long-term goals, the significance of communicating a clear mission, and the experience of navigating AI as a leader. Liz offers valuable advice for leaders in new roles, highlighting the importance of authenticity and collaboration.
Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.
Speaker A: Welcome to the Land and Lead podcast, where we explore the real stories behind leadership transitions, the setbacks, strategies, wins, and moments of growth, all aimed at helping other leaders land well and lead effectively. I'm your host, Dr. Josh Elmore of Corkstreet Consulting. Today we're speaking with Liz Har, managing partner at Hinge. Liz is a growth strategist, entrepreneur and executive who has more than two decades helping professional service firms accelerate their success. A co founder of a tech company early in her career, Liz Liz serves as managing partner at Hinge, where she specializes in strategic planning, brand management and communications. Recognized as a visible expert in the professional services space, Liz is a frequent author, speaker and thought leader. She has co authored several cornerstone publications from the Hinge Research Institute, including the Visible Expert Revolution and Inside the Buyer's Brain, which have shaped how firms across the globe approach growth. Her path to marketing was anything but traditional. With a master's in International Economics from Columbia University and a Bachelor of Arts in French and East Asian Studies from the University of Missouri, Liz's true through line has always been strategy. Uncovering new ways to grow, connect and lead. That passion extends beyond her professional life. Liz is also the author of children's books designed to spark imagination and community mindedness in young readers. She lives in Northern Virginia with her husband, three sons and two dogs, where life is as full of energy and ideas at home as it is at work. Welcome to the show, Liz.
Speaker B: Thank you so much, Josh. It's great to be here.
Speaker A: Sure, yeah, we're excited to have you. So, Liz, can you tell us, uh, you know, share little bit about your background and how you landed at Hinge?
Speaker B: Yeah, I mean, like you just said in your opening comments, it's a pretty untraditional path, but I think that's sort of the way of the world now anyway. So, yeah, I'm, you know, I'm managing partner of a marketing and branding agency, but nothing, nothing in my past professional life or in my academic background really has to do directly with marketing. I, between undergrad and graduate school, I lived in Japan and worked with the Japanese government. And then after grad school I worked, uh, actually before grad school, I worked at the Japanese embassy in D.C. so I was fully expecting to have a career in bilateral relations communications, bringing. Bringing two sides together. Uh, and now here I am today, you know, managing partner of a marketing agency. But in a way it makes perfect sense, that indirect path, you know, I think probably a lot of your listeners can resonate with, oh, you think you're going to do One thing, but, but if you're open to it, you're. One door opens and then another and another, and suddenly you see these things that you never really considered before. So that's really what happened with me. I co founded a tech firm and Lee Fredrickson, who, uh, is now retired from Hinge, but he was one of the founding partners. He was my executive coach. And uh, as I grew that company, I, uh, I grew it and got it through the uh, 0708 market collapse. And after that and all those battle scars that came with it, I said, I'm on to my chapter two. So merged that company with a friendly, uh, competitor and I turned to Lee as my coach and I, I just said, here's, you know, I'm, I'm really passionate about growing companies. And he said, well, let me tell you about what we do at Hinge. We are marketing and branding, but what we really do is, is teach our clients how to grow. So really it was just perfect alignment that uh, I was coming to the table with a passion for growing firms and helping leaders understand how to do that in a sustainable way. Um, and that's what Hinge does. They teach companies how to use marketing and how to pay attention to their brand, uh, so that it ports over to growth.
Speaker A: Wonderful. Yeah, super powerful. And terms of thinking about that idea of uh, your second, uh, stage and being so kind of distinct about it, uh, cause it is different, uh, but it sounds like those were the activities you were involved in for growing a company as you got to see it firsthand, uh, as an entrepreneur.
Speaker B: Absolutely.
Speaker A: So can you tell us more about Hinge and the situation when you entered, um, the managing partner role?
Speaker B: Sure. So Hinge is very entrepreneurially minded. Uh, we were founded by entrepreneurs, we are led by entrepreneurs. And I came in as well because we're entrepreneurs. I really have played almost every role at Hinge except the graphic design role. That's not in my wheelhouse. Uh, and I know my limitations. But, uh, I think that's really powerful for me today as a managing partner to have played, sat in the seat of so many different roles because I really, not only do I understand the makings of it, but I can approach it empathetically, like truly empathetically. And I cannot think of a more powerful skill for today's leaders than to lead with empathy. That's for another conversation, but all to say that, um, Hinge is a very entrepreneurially minded marketing and branding agencies that helps medium sized professional services firms figure out how are we Supposed to grow. And when we're sandwiched between, we're competing with the huge behemoth, well known companies whose brand names are like household names, and then we're competing with very small specialists who are freelancers and have overhead. How do we in the middle compete with that and grow? That's what we teach.
Speaker A: Yeah, I love it. And. Right. Just a disclaimer to listeners. I'm a client of Hinge and I love them, so check them out, um, because they're great and their, uh, visible expert program is fantastic. So when you became, how long have you been a managing partner?
Speaker B: So I've been managing partner for almost two years.
Speaker A: Okay. Yeah, so two years. And you've been at Hinge for how long?
Speaker B: About 12.
Speaker A: Okay, 12 years. So two years in and managing partner kind of, uh, what's the scope there?
Speaker B: Yeah. So I should say that, uh, we are a group of five managing partners.
Speaker A: Okay.
Speaker B: And that's a kind of a new business model that is out there. It makes sense for organizations who have grown in a relatively flat, uh, sort of structure. And that has served us so well. I mean, at Hinge, we really, we hire people who are very tenured, very seasoned people. And so this kind of structure makes sense for us. So as a group of five, uh, managing part, we used to be, uh, six and then two retired and we brought one in. So all to say that one of the things that we've been very disciplined around as a group of five is to have our lanes. Have our lanes where we directly contribute to hinges success. And the reason I bring that up is because I think a lot of times managing partners or someone in a similar role gets tasked with doing everything. And that can be very overwhelming. The way we've structured it since coming in a couple years ago, uh, has really allowed us to be effective where we are very talented. So I, uh, play a heavy role in client services, for example. Um, that suits me very well because it takes advantage of certain skills that I bring to the table that are just natural to me and I don't have to learn them. Another of the managing partners is more responsible for our research program because he's very oriented that way. So that's a pivot that we've made and a, uh, distinction that we've made in each of our roles as managing partners. But at the end of the day, we are collectively responsible for Hinge's overall performance and just have our unique lanes that contribute to that.
Speaker A: Wow. And so was that structure built, uh, when you came on as managing partner? Was that kind of when it constituted.
Speaker B: No, this is something that we develop as some of the younger partners stepped into this role. So those of us who are now managing partners, we've. Between us, um, some of us have. So I've been there for 12, some have been there for more, some have been there for less. But, um, we're all relatively, you know, kind of the, represent the younger generation coming in. And so we saw it as an opportunity to really do two things. One is honor what exists and is also working. New. New partners are not here to dismantle everything, just to put their stamp on it and say, okay, change is here and I'm, uh, doing it. Um, that's, that's pretty disastrous, I think, when you're transitioning. So one is honor what is already working and leverage that and maintain it at the same time. What are some opportunities to change? And we saw that within my managing partner group, we really did have some distinct and unique talent sets. So we said, let's leverage those. And that's where we came up with this what's your lane? Uh, mentality.
Speaker A: And so it sounds like there's this kind of deep collaboration, um, and respect. It sounds like also too, from an expertise perspective on how to structure your, your team and your leadership roles. And it sounds like there's, uh, also distribution on kind of how things get, um, managed. Right. From, from an organization perspective, did that evolve kind of the way that you manage the organization, maybe not just around the expertise, and if so, how did that evolve?
Speaker B: Yeah, that was a, that was a big cultural shift. Um, prior to me stepping in as managing partner, really almost all decisions were at the partner level. And that takes a lot of time and energy. But it also doesn't necessarily tap into up and coming leaders who have some great ideas. And it's not because in our previous model we were reluctant to do that or it's not that at all. It's just, it's sort of like the entrepreneur's curse. And you just have to be aware of that. Like as entrepreneurs, you want to take on everything yourself. You can do it better, faster than others is sort of the mentality, even though it's probably not true. But we tended to make all the decisions. So in this new model, uh, not only have we found our own unique lanes, but we now have taken deliberate steps to empower others in the organization to lead to make decisions. And, uh, we have a pretty defined process for making decisions so that things can get through the decision pipeline quickly and efficiently or not. You know, sitting There with like paralysis by analysis kind of pitfall that I think a lot of companies fall into.
Speaker A: Yeah, yeah, certainly. And you know, kind of it's a delicate process, certainly. Right. Uh, as an entrepreneur myself, uh, I know that I gotta do everything on my own and to get staff and all of those things are gonna be. It's a big shift, certainly. But so thinking about, right, you're in your time and role, uh, for two, um, coming up on two years now and things are changing. You've, you've sat in a lot of seats. But um, now this kind of uh, managing partner role, um, where you're co creating with your team and kind of empowering folks from below to kind of be involved and help develop their leadership. So what strategies have helped you navigate your transition?
Speaker B: That's a great question. One big shift we had to make is in our focus on the timeline. And what I mean by that is prior to me stepping into this role, we were really focused on the short term, the here and now. Now to be fair, many of us, uh, in leadership roles were focused on the here and now because of the pandemic environment and all the disruption that that created. So we had to take a look at, you know, week to week to week, month to month to month. What are our KPIs. I'm reminded of this book that came out, I think it was last year or the year before called Business Builders. And it's by Dan Adams. He writes regularly on B2B organic growth, uh, specifically for the Fortune 500s of the world. But there's tons of lessons to learn for those of us who don't fall into that large, uh, category. And this book was based on some research he did where he was able to use research on habits of leaders to make a distinction, distinction between two kinds of leaders. Business builders and business climbers. He advocates be a builder, not a climber. And one of the habits of the climbers of the world is they are constantly focusing on the short term. Uh, he actually called them the decorators of the world because you know, their P. Ls always look really good month to month, um, because they're making sure the shelves are decorated just so. But they lose with that tight focus on the short term. Always, always, always. I mean any of your listeners. The pitfalls of that are obvious. Um, so at hinge, we were tightly focused on the short term. Even our employee incentive program was based on month to month performance metrics. So we overhauled that. Everything we do, of course we don't take our eyes off the short term. But we are continually reporting on the long term, including we restructured our incentive program so it's based on annual performance. And that's a big cultural shift. Uh, I think people were uncomfortable with that at first. So it took a lot of socializing, being super transparent about it, talking about it. And when you have a big cultural overhaul like that, it takes transparent and constant communications to make sure your team is riding along with it. Um, but that was a big. That strategy, focusing on the long term and making sure we're continually reporting on it has really helped us, uh, have a couple of wins. Um, one is we resurrected our own podcast. Um, we used to have a podcast a couple years ago where we, it uh, was called the Visible Expert Podcast. And we reimagined that, uh, thinking about the long term and where we want to sit and how we want to be viewed. So we kind of reimagined our podcast with that in mind. Another big win, um, that this long term helped, long term View helped us do is we resurrected our monthly newsletter. And our monthly newsletter used to just not get that much attention and we let it drop because it didn't seem like a good use of our time. And now I regularly hear from people, I uh, publish every Friday, actually it's weekly. And um, I regularly hear from people who are finding value in it and it's resonating with them. So this long term orientation has really helped us think, think carefully about who we are and how we're going to get there, which has then helped us be uh, more efficient in some of the resurrection of the tools that are going to get us there. Wow.
Speaker A: Yeah. Super powerful. Yeah. And I read your newsletter, I love it. So one thing that's kind of um, coming up for me here is. Right, so you have these ways that you were able to unlock for the kind of assets and the external environment, uh, to kind of help the business in that long term view. From an internal perspective, how did you help folks, um, as they shifted towards that longer term view, kind of what was the way that you framed it? How did you communicate that so people could really kind of latch onto it and become see themselves in it?
Speaker B: Yeah, I mean the first thing you know that uh, you know that phrase, it's something like when a team knows the mission, they can move mountains, Something like that. One of the very first things we did was communicate our mission. Who is hinge? Why do we exist? What are we known for? And how, what is the value that we deliver? Just rethinking that and communicating it and then injecting it into everything we do is really important because that means the teams understand every other decision we make. Uh, so that was a very, that was a fundamental, impactful decision we made. Is let's make sure, before we announce any new ideas we have, let's make sure we're communicating the mission. So the first thing, the second thing was then to have. So that's kind of like macro level discussions. Then. Uh, what we did is have micro level team, team based discussions and really get people thinking. Like not telling them, here's your role and here's how you can contribute to our overall mission and here's the expectations. We dismantled that, um, and we said what are your, you know, the mission, what are your thoughts? How are you going to contribute? How are you going to empower the people you manage? What do you think are the KPIs? You should be held accountable for. Just having that discussion and putting the thinking at that team level was another impactful move that we made that really to your question, gets teams not just understanding what we're talking about with our long term mission, but actually excited about it and rallied around it.
Speaker A: Yeah, yeah, super powerful in terms of kind of to allow giving people and from an organization development perspective that's, you know, it's a really powerful practice. Um, putting the kind of, you know, uh, folks that are having to implement the work in the driver's seat and letting them kind of imagine their place in the mission that you've uh, created and um. To write, co create.
Speaker B: Yeah, that's right. The third thing we did, which I think a lot of your listeners would resonate with is you know, what you report on and the KPIs and dashboards you look at is a reflection of your overall approach. So we, we took some of the pressure off of you know, week to week to week. What's the uh, what's the project profitability? How are the projects going? Just that scrupulous look, kind of like a day in the life. And we shifted that to monthly. But on a reporting we really look at quarterly because we understand the ebb and flow and week to week you're just going to have these fluctuations and circumstances that are, that are going to change project KPIs. It almost doesn't even make sense to look at that frequently. But what that also did is it took the pressure off the teams like they put our, we were walking the walk or walking the talk I guess is the phrase. We said we're looking at the long term we're focused on the long term. So have the KPIs and what we report on, uh, with our teams have that be reflective of what we said we're going to do.
Speaker A: Yeah, right, yeah. Walking the talk. Super, super important to have that follow up. People see it, you know, they pay attention.
Speaker B: So.
Speaker A: Right. You mentioned some wins right, in, in this um, year. Ah, coming up on two years. What are some setbacks and how did they manifest?
Speaker B: Well, I think a big thing we had to grapple with is the type of advisory that Hinge provides is very brain intensive. There's nothing that you can pull out of like a marketing 101. Um, that's not our world. It's very brain intensive. It requires lots of space, lots of thinking time and just, and lots of our own time to always be up to speed on the latest and greatest on how you grow companies. I mean there's so much to think about and learn there. So with the exit of Lee Fredrickson, the co, the co founder, uh, when he retired as a managing partner and we stepped in, that left a big brain gap and we had to figure out how to relieve some time from us, the managing partners who were already doing, giving that brain power to our clients. But we were also heavily involved in other things and we had, we had to create time. Basically is, that's a pretty uh, tall order is create time. Uh, but what it helped us do is empower. Kind of like what we were talking about earlier. The need to create time forced us to figure out how do we empower other team members who aren't at the partner level but who very much have the talent, the knowledge, the, and the power to lead. Let's empower them to do that, take on these tasks. We don't have to do everything, empower others to do it. Which then created the space for the partners to provide that, uh, we call it the gray hair advisory, even though none of us really have gray hair. But have you read that, uh, Harvard Business Review article is from a long time ago that talked about the different levels of service in professional services and that gray hair advisory is the most expensive, most time consuming but most needed type of advisory. And one of those advisors retired and we had to quickly create time so the rest of us could step in?
Speaker A: Yeah, I haven't read that article. I definitely will take a look at it. But it certainly makes sense. Right? Because that wisdom, the need to kind of have the experience to provide the advisory at the level that the clients need given uh, their circumstances and seeing across uh, contexts definitely a huge lift I know from my own work. And um, uh, it's something that uh, this idea of to also create time and to understand how to delegate effectively takes a little bit of that. You have to consult to yourself a little bit. Uh, how do you do that? So super interesting, uh, the kind of wins and particularly uh, the, the wins that you had around kind of reorganizing and thinking about the kind of uh, timeline to getting things right. And you know a question I often like to ask my guests is. In the 1980s John Gabor ran a few studies focused on general managers and presidents as they pursued new roles and wrote the results up. In the book the Dynamics of Taking Charge, Gaborow explained that an executive has fully taken charge when they have mastered the new assignment in sufficient depth to be managing the organization as efficiently as the resources constraints and the manager's own ability allow. Thinking about this definition where 100% is having fully taken charge in your new assignment. Right. The areas that you focus on, what percent would you say you are at now?
Speaker B: What an interesting time uh, to be asking that question. So if AI were not a thing, I would say 75%. And the reason I say that is because my partner group and I happen to be super, super, super oriented on performance metrics and operational efficiency. Like we're just wired that way and I just have the good uh, fortune to be surrounded by partners who are like minded in that regard. So we're scrupulous about that. However, I think what AI is showing us is that we're pro. You know, it's like humans use just a tiny percent of their brain. Actually that's how I feel. That's how I feel with AI is it is showing me as a managing partner, we're just tapping into a small percentage of what we could be tapping into to reach supreme operational performance. So I feel like were much lower than how I would have rated us were AI not in the picture. Wow.
Speaker A: Yeah. So kind of the long hill of uh, reaching kind of comprehension or comprehensiveness of ways um, of working and doing things is super interesting. Uh, so you said were AI not involved. 75% given AI being involved, kind of. How far has that set you back a little bit in terms of thinking about taking charge.
Speaker B: I mean like I'm saying, I think it's probably 25% and that's not really a bad thing. AI is such a tremendous opportunity to re. I, uh, used the word reimagine earlier when I was talking about our processes and some of our Tool set. It's an opportunity to reimagine how you do things. And so I'm excited about it, but it's just overwhelming to think of what to focus on first and where to apply it, which process, which workflow. I think that's part of my job as a leader, is to look at where are the weakest links in our path forward to growth and then looking if there are appropriate ways to apply the efficiencies that AI can bring to the table in those weak links and just kind of approach it one weak link at a time.
Speaker A: Yeah, yeah. And it speaks also to kind of, to the long term thinking as well. Right. You know, trying to imagine where the future is going to be and how it can address those challenges of the moment. So what advice would you share with leaders? Uh, currently entering a new high stakes role?
Speaker B: I think three primary pieces of advice come to mind. One is to relieve yourself from the pressure of feeling like you've got to tackle everything all at once. One of our, one of our managing directors, he's my go to guru for metaphors and analogies. And I was talking with him the other day and he said something that really resonated and speaks directly to this. And he said when his son, who's much older now, but when his son was young and entering little league baseball and he was so excited and he's like, I'm going to get five home runs today. And he had all these expectations and he was saying, I really had to temper my son's expectations because even in the major leagues where these guys are the professionals, a, uh, good batting average, like we're not even talking home runs, but does it hit the ball with the bat is like a 0.2 or a 0.3. So temper expectations. You're not going to walk in as a new leader and tackle everything all at once. Nor should you. That's too disruptive. Uh, transitions are noisy. They're disruptive. So temper your expectations. Like uh, I was talking about earlier, what are the biggest, weakest links and, and maybe tackle one at a time. Empower your people to help you tackling those weak links. But really temper expectations so you don't come in like a bulldozer and just dismantle. Because when you do that, a lot of times you dismantle things that are working and should be leveraged and should be retained. So that's my first, uh, my second is show up with authenticity. I think when leaders are authentic, they are making it more comfortable for others to step up and help Lead the way. Conversely, if you show up with bravado and fluff and, you know, all the confidence in the world, that's really not approachable for others to kind of grow up through the ranks. But when you show up with authenticity, I think what you're showing is, hey, I'm human. I don't know everything. I shouldn't know everything. I can't do everything. So let's do this together. You're making it doable for people when you show up with authenticity. Um, so I think that's important, and I think the last one is kind of related to that. But I always say if you are constantly the smartest person in the room, as the leader, you have failed big time. And that's because you cannot genuinely be in command of the number of specialized areas of expertise required to run a company. You cannot. So a good leader, in my mind, especially when you're in that transitional role, will arm themselves with others who are smarter than they are about a particular lane or a particular topic. So be comfortable. When you're not the smartest person in the room, that means you've succeeded.
Speaker A: Yeah. And that really speaks to kind of the authenticity and. Right. Humility that goes along with, uh, kind of what you shared is, how do you not be the smartest? Well, you got to kind of speak. You got to show that you don't know everything, and that's authentic. And maybe you can be pleasantly surprised if you're managing your expectations because then you set yourself up for success.
Speaker B: Indeed.
Speaker A: Yeah. Super powerful. Liz, you know, thank you so much for sharing with us. Is there anything you'd like to, uh, share that's coming up for you or Hinge?
Speaker B: Uh, well, you know, Hinge is known for our original research, and we have a flagship report that we produce every single year. It's called the High Growth Study. And I would encourage people to go to our library. You can get the executive summary of this year's report for free. Free. We're actively working on the 2026 study, which will be out early next year. But, I mean, it is just. I love it because it helps leaders think about, hey, I've got. I've got dozens and dozens of possibilities when it comes to how I'm going to grow my company and apply marketing to that growth equation. What's really going to move the needle. And that's what this research is about. So I'd love for anyone who doesn't know us, uh, for that research already to go check it out.
Speaker A: So. Sounds good. Yeah. Moving the needle is critical.
Speaker B: Yes.
Speaker A: All right. Well, thank you, Liz. Really appreciate you taking the time to come on.
Speaker B: Thank you, Josh. It was so fun to talk with you today.
Speaker A: Certainly. Thanks so much for listening to the Land and Lead podcast. I'm your host, Dr. Josh Elmore. Tune in next time for more stories from leaders navigating high stakes role transitions.
Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.