The B2B Podcast Index
Index
All categories
MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
MethodologySubmit
Best of:MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
An independent project byFame
SearchBest episodesGuestsInsightsMethodologySubmit a podcast
Index/Leadership/Land and Lead
Land and Lead artwork

"Every Search is Highly Customized" - Camille Fetter of Talentfoot

Land and Lead · 2025-12-16 · 29 min

0:00--:--

Key moments - from our scoring

Substance score

62 / 100

Five dimensions, 20 points each

Insight Density12 / 20
Originality11 / 20
Guest Caliber15 / 20
Specificity & Evidence11 / 20
Conversational Craft13 / 20

Camille Fetter built Talentfoot after 15 years working in staffing and executive search, driven by her belief that conversations can transform careers. The firm specializes in placing experienced executives at companies ranging from $5M to $500M, focusing on sales, marketing, technology, finance, and operations roles. Fetter emphasizes that executive search isn't about posting and praying - it's headhunting passive candidates with proven track records who have the playbook to execute a company's specific growth strategy. Her process begins with deep intake sessions that rip apart generic job descriptions and replace them with detailed position profiles that tell the company's story. She uses behavioral interviewing with carefully designed questions that reveal whether candidates were the brains behind their organization's success or simply in the right place at the right time. Fetter advocates for using tools like Hogan assessments for leadership blind spots, reference checks that surface strengths and weaknesses, and candidate scorecards that calibrate every finalist against the same standards. A critical insight from her two decades of experience: organizations claiming they want disruption while only hiring from within their industry are actually hiring more of the same thinking. She recommends pulling talent from progressive industries when seeking innovation - for example, bringing SaaS marketing expertise into healthcare. For candidates, Fetter advises treating interviews as two-way streets, defining success metrics upfront, and collaborating with hiring managers on quarterly KPIs rather than discovering misalignment after day one.

Key takeaways

  • →Every executive search should be highly customized around specific business strategy and goals, not a cookie-cutter approach based on job title or industry alone.
  • →Behavioral interview questions designed to reveal how a candidate thinks on their feet and articulates strategy are far more predictive than credentials or being in the right place at the right time.
  • →Organizations pursuing innovation must source 50% of candidates from outside their industry, not just within it, to avoid hiring more of the same thinking.
  • →Leadership assessments like Hogan combined with executive coaching should involve both the new hire and hiring manager to establish psychological safety and alignment before the first day.
  • →Candidates must interview the organization as rigorously as they are interviewed, defining what success looks like at 6 months, 12 months, and agreeing on KPIs upfront to avoid misalignment post-hire.

Guests

Camille Fetter

Topics in this episode

Leadership transitionsExecutive searchCandidate experienceheadhunting versus recruitingonboardingbehavioral interviewingcandidate scorecardsTalentfootTalentfoot Executive Search and StaffingHogan leadership assessmentsPosition profilesSearch strategyLeadership assessments and coachingReference checksQuarterly KPI cadences

Questions this episode answers

How do you determine if a candidate actually drove their company's success or was just in the right place at the right time?

Talentfoot uses behavioral interview questions designed to reveal how candidates think on their feet and articulate their vision, strategy, and tactics. For example, asking how they'd scale a $30 million business to $100 million in three years surfaces whether they have genuine business instinct and a playbook versus surface-level experience.

Should we only hire executives from within our industry?

No. Many companies claiming they want to innovate while hiring exclusively from within their industry end up hiring more of the same thinking. If innovation is a business goal, pull 50% of candidates from outside the industry where they may bring different approaches - like bringing SaaS marketing expertise into healthcare.

What should hiring managers and new executives do during onboarding to set up success?

Use leadership assessments like Hogan with both the new hire and hiring manager, have an executive coach explain blind spots and how each party works best together, conduct detailed reference checks to understand strengths and weaknesses upfront, and establish a quarterly cadence with defined KPIs rather than discovering misalignment after 90 days.

What is the difference between recruiting and headhunting?

Recruiting is posting a job and hoping the right candidate applies; Talentfoot does about 2% of that. Headhunting involves actively targeting passive candidates who aren't looking, telling the story of the business and opportunity, and pulling them in against a pre-defined search strategy.

What questions should candidates ask during interviews to ensure alignment?

Candidates should ask what success looks like at 6 months and 12 months, how success is measured, whether KPIs are achievable, and collaborate with the hiring manager on a position scorecard that distills the job description into success metrics for every aspect of the role.

What our scoring noted

Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.

Insight Density

12 / 20

The episode contains solid practitioner advice on executive search and hiring (intake process, behavioral interviewing, avoiding industry groupthink, assessment tools like Hogan, retention check-ins), but much of it is standard executive hiring practice rather than novel or non-obvious. The guest repeats frameworks multiple times and the conversation lacks data, metrics, or counterintuitive claims that would push this higher. Several segments feel like throat-clearing (lemonade stand origin story, crisis line background) that don't directly inform the core topic.

every search is highly customized
we want to hear how they think on their feet

Originality

11 / 20

The core insight - that hiring organizations often rely too heavily on industry-specific recruiting and miss innovation - is sensible but not particularly fresh or contrarian. The emphasis on behavioral interviewing, assessments, and structured intake processes are well-established best practices in executive search. The host and guest largely affirm each other's thinking rather than test or challenge assumptions. The brief mention of AI at the end feels tacked on and underdeveloped.

the more senior the position, the more the soft skills are important
recruiting often can be you're posting and praying

Guest Caliber

15 / 20

Camille is a relevant, credible practitioner - founder and CEO of an executive search firm with 20 years in recruiting and search, serving $5M - $500M growth-stage companies. She has been quoted in reputable publications and is a member of professional councils. However, she is primarily a service provider (recruiter) rather than a founder or operator who has built and scaled a company from zero, which limits the depth of her expertise on the hiring side's strategic challenges. Her caliber is solid but not exceptional for a B2B leadership podcast.

Founder and CEO of talentfoot Executive Search and Staffing
has spent two decades advising founders, private equity partners and C suite leaders

Specificity & Evidence

11 / 20

The episode is light on concrete data, numbers, and named examples. While Camille mentions company size ranges ($5M - $500M, examples of $30M and $100M revenue targets), specific case studies, or measurable outcomes from her placements, there are very few. Most claims are illustrative rather than evidenced: 'I can't tell you how many times' without naming situations, 'We do very little of that. Maybe 2%' for posting/praying but no other metrics. No data on placement success rates, retention, or comparative performance.

organizations that are looking to scale their $30 million direct to consumer CPG business to a hundred million in three years
We do very little of that. Maybe 2% of that

Conversational Craft

13 / 20

The host, Dr. Elmore, asks competent, open-ended questions that logically follow the conversation and show he is listening (e.g., clarifying on hard vs. soft skills weighting, asking about insider vs. outsider hires). However, he rarely pushes back, challenges, or probes deeper when Camille makes broad claims. When she says 'so many times' organizations make mistakes, he doesn't ask for specifics or counterexamples. The tone is collaborative and warm, but this softness reduces the intellectual rigor. Follow-ups tend to validate and expand rather than interrogate.

And so it sounds like an evidence based approach, right
Such a great insight. Right. From those many different moments of seeing across roles and placements

Conversation analysis

Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.

Share of words spoken

  • Speaker B75%
  • Speaker A25%

Most-used words

search20hiring18candidate14organization14leaders13interview13talent12industry12success11process10goals10leader10growth8camille8executive8role8

Episode notes

In this episode of the Land and Lead podcast, Dr. Josh Elmore interviews Camille Fetter, founder and CEO of Talentfoot Executive Search and Staffing. They discuss Camille's journey into executive search, her innovative approach to hiring, and the importance of understanding both the candidate and organizational needs. Camille shares insights on best practices for candidates, the significance of onboarding, and the value of leadership assessments. The conversation also touches on the role of AI and the value for leaders in developing competency in these new tools.

Full transcript

29 min

Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.

Speaker A: Welcome to the Land and Lead podcast where we explore the real stories behind leadership transitions. The setbacks, strategies, wins and moments of growth. All aimed at helping other leaders land well and lead effectively. I'm your host, Dr. Josh Elmore of Court Street Consulting. Today we're speaking with Camille Feder, Founder and CEO of talentfoot Executive Search and Staffing. Camille is a nationally recognized executive search expert who helps growth stage companies from $5 million to $500 million 7 scale by placing the top 1% of executives in sales, marketing, technology and finance. As the founder and CEO of talentfoot Executive Search and Staffing, Camille has spent two decades advising founders, private equity partners and C suite leaders on how to build high impact leadership and go to market teams that drive growth and transformation. Her forward thinking approach, rooted in the belief that the job can change a life, has redefined executive search in the digital age. Camille's insights have been featured in the Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Business Insider, and CIO.com. she is a member of the Forbes HR Council and founding member of Chief. Welcome to the show, Camille.

Speaker B: Thank you, Josh, so much for having me. And gosh, 20 years. It seems like it's been two years. Um, I guess you have officially, uh, dated me.

Speaker A: Well, time flies when you're having fun, I guess. Right?

Speaker B: That's right. That's right.

Speaker A: So, uh, Camille, can you share a bit about your background and how you came to found talentfoot?

Speaker B: Absolutely. So, gosh, at the ripe age of about eight, I was the child that loved to host lemonade sales more than I did enjoy, uh, playing on the playground. Right. So I loved meeting new people. I love innovating. I was the kid that was upselling to the raspberry lemonade, the chocolate chip cookies. Right. The list goes on. And so I really, and my parents were exceptional leaders in my life and still are today. They, they told me at a young age, you just have a knack with people. You've got to do something in the profession of people. Fast forward. Uh, in my, in my college years, I was, uh, studying advertising, uh, in school. And I realized that while I was really enjoying my studies, that there was probably a lot more meaning in life that I could probably find in those four years on campus. And I randomly came across a flyer for the Denver Metropolitan crisis line. And I thought, wow, talk about an opportunity to impact people's lives and make a difference. Fast forward. I became a trainer at this crisis line for years, about three years my undergrad. And I took on, um, suicide calls, sexuality calls, domestic violence calls. The list goes on, um, and so it was at the age of 19 where I realized, wow, the power of conversation can not only change the trajectory of someone's life, but actually even save people's lives. Lives. Um, so, um, I eventually fell into corporate America, I would say, living in a cubicle, ah, in Excel spreadsheets all day. And I thought, oh, gosh, this just isn't for me. There's got to be more. Um, and so I randomly met a recruiter and looking for what's next. Right. And trying to find what my real North Star was in life. And halfway through the interview, I paused the, uh, conversation and I said it. If I may interrupt, uh, you for a moment. Can I ask you, do you enjoy what you do? Can you not wait to get out of bed every day? Because that's what I'm looking for. And she said, I get to. Every day I get thank you notes, frankly, for just doing my job. And I get to impact people's families. Uh, so that was the moment at 22 years old that I found my calling. And fast forward. So I worked for a staffing firm for four years, was a top producer there. Then I moved to executive search, was which was the logical next step in my career. And then four years later, I said, I want to make up my own rules, my own processes, my own procedures that are best for the candidates and the hiring teams. Uh, and that I founded Talent Foot 15 years ago.

Speaker A: Wow, what a story. And one rooted really in that, uh, kind of pursuit of being with people, helping people through their journeys, whatever that journey was, from, you know, ah, traumatic moments in life to kind of those career pathways that people have. And then also deciding for yourself that you wanted to kind of do it your own way. What made you decide kind of that, uh, you needed to come up with your own rules. What was that insight that you saw?

Speaker B: Yeah, great question. So I was 28 years old and I was within a. Working within a firm that had over 500 associates. And I saw that there were areas of the business that just felt broken to me for the candidate experience, the hiring experience. And so I, uh, would raise my hand and I would say, hey, I think we can fix that. I think we can build a process globally. Right. Well, guess what? No one was listening to the 28 year old in the room. Right. With fairly little work experience at the time. And so that's, uh, when I realized, you know what? I think I just need to build it myself.

Speaker A: Yeah. Wow. And kind, uh, of seeing that opening and taking it and so can you Tell us more about talentfoot and how, how you work with hiring organizations and prospective candidates.

Speaker B: Absolutely. So, uh, we are essentially headhunters, right? So organizations hire us to find the highest impact players in business today. So these are organizations that cannot afford to make a mistake. Right. It's high risk, um, high reward organizations that are oftentimes either private equity backed or have investors involved that are really focused on value creation. So they're focused on, for example, taking a $50 million business and accelerating its growth to 300 million within five years and exiting the business. So that's when it's high stakes. And they need the proven players that have the playbook who've been there and done it before and can repeat, uh, the win again. Uh, so we recruit across marketing stuff, sales, technology, accounting, finance, uh, operations and hr. So the main corporate functions, um, that really are focused on, uh, driving growth, really accelerating innovation and ultimately profitability for these businesses.

Speaker A: And you mentioned this idea of like a playbook, somebody, a candidate who has a playbook. So for hiring organizations, what is the kind of best practice that they should follow for placing leaders?

Speaker B: Great question. So we, how we, we're hired to mitigate risk, right. So in order to do that, we have to look for the talent that has the track record of accomplishing exactly what that business is looking to accomplish. So, so that's how we avoid rolling the dice. Right. So in our process, uh, we're extremely passionate around really understanding what the business strategy and goals are. If we understand where the business sees itself and wants to go, right. We can then back into the right skills and the right level that that business needs and the various functions within the business to achieve those goals. And most importantly, identifying the individuals that have the track record of accomplishing just that.

Speaker A: And so it sounds like an evidence based approach, right. Rooted in kind of the track record of the leader, but also the needs of the organization. And how do you kind of assess those two things?

Speaker B: Great question. So we are really big on behavioral interviewing. We are big on what I call taking the car for a test drive. So we design interview questions and this is a little peek behind the curtain for those job seekers. There is a lot of thought that's put into these interview questions that we design. Right. And it's really ultimately focused on uncovering are they the individual that happen to be the brains behind that organization's success, or did they just happen to be in the right place at the right time? Right. So an interview question might be along the lines of, now that you learn more about this Organization. And you understand that they're looking to scale their $30 million direct to consumer CPG, uh, business to a hundred million in three years, primarily by way of Amazon and other marketplaces. Tell me how you'd get the business there. So they have to, we have to. We want to hear how they think on their feet. That tells us a lot. Uh, and they can truly articulate what their vision, their strategy and even the tactics that, that would be involved in getting the business there. Well, you know, we're, we're calibrating every candidate against those same interview questions. So, and that we're using a candidate scorecard where every candidate is getting scored on various functional, um, areas of the business, very hard skills, soft skills, etcetera, et cetera. And the weak tend to surface, um, they stumble on those, those questions and they don't quite know where to go. And the strongest players have a great instinct and playbook that they're able to share. Uh, that tells us that we've got a winner on the phone.

Speaker A: And when you're thinking about kind of the hard versus soft skills, how do you weight those two?

Speaker B: So it's, it depends on this, on the position. So there are some positions that we weight soft skills higher than the hard skills. Right. Uh, typically the more senior the, the position, the more the soft skills are important. Right. So the leadership chops. Right. The communication chops, the ability to take complex, uh, subjects and distill them in very simple terms to drive an organization forward and get all of the parties on board rowing in the same direction. Right. So it also depends on, again, the business strategy and the goals. So the more we uncover, uh, in terms of what the business is looking to accomplish, who the business has, frankly today from a talent perspective and who they don't. Right. Uh, we want to avoid redundancy in skill sets. We want to make sure we understand the weaknesses of a function. Right. Uh, to make sure that that's the strength of the leader, uh, and the list goes on. So, uh, there's a lot of nuances. No search is ever alike. Uh, and every search is highly customized.

Speaker A: Yeah. Yeah. Just like every situation is different when the leader goes in and has to navigate those dynamics and thinking about from the candidate side, how can leaders help ensure success when they're going through the candidate process?

Speaker B: Uh, so a really important one. And I think this is a topic that's overlooked. I always tell executives that you're interviewing the organization just as much as they're interviewing you. Right. So that's, it's Just like you're dating, you're about to go down the aisle. Right. It's. I mean, we spend a lot of time with our colleagues. Right. More time, frankly, uh, than sometimes with our own family members. So that fits that chemistry. Uh, that alignment is just as important for the candidate as it is for the hiring team. So a couple things I would encourage job seekers to do. Ask what, how, what success looks like in the role? What does success look like six months into the role? What does success look like a year after on board? How do you, Mr. And Mrs. Hiring Manager, know that I was the one for the job 12 months, uh, after you hired me. Right. Secondly, how is success measured? Right. And frankly, you'll hear from a. Hiring. A lot of hiring managers that, that struggle with this. Right. And it's. It actually. And it's okay if they struggle because it's an opportunity to collaborate and really also turn that interview into a working session where you're determining what the KPIs are together. Right. Then ensuring that their goals and expectations are not completely outlandish. Right. And are achievable. Uh, from your perspective, if not, run for the hills. Right. Or it's maybe not the job for you. Right. Um, because obviously if you're not aligned on what the goals are and what success looks like, then no one's being set up for success and there's only going to be disappointment from one or both parties once you are selected for the job. I highly encourage job seekers to collaborate with their leader on, um, what a position scorecard looks like. So distilling the job description into a framework where you are aligned with what does success look like in every aspect of the role. Right. And then setting up a quarterly cadence and these inflection points, uh, where you're determining with your leader, what are the goals for the quarter, what does a successful quarter look like. Right. And then after the end of every quarter, doing a recap, did we accomplish what we thought we would accomplish and we sought out to accomplish? And so I would just say, oftentimes it's the direct reports that make the leaders better leaders. Right. Where they're managing up and they're really driving alignment and frankly over communicating from the start.

Speaker A: Hmm. And kind of speaking to that dynamic between, you know, your boss and also your direct report and you're going into this new assignment. What's some best practices that you've seen leaders employ or organizations employ in terms of supporting leaders for them to come effectively on board and, um, integrate and onboard with their team with their leader and kind of navigate those kind of early moments of challenge and assessment.

Speaker B: Yeah, a couple things. So I'm really big on, uh, leadership assessments. Some of our listeners may say, yes, I'm so glad to hear her say that, and some may say, oh, I can't stand those. We use Hogan, uh, as our leadership assessment within our executive search process. It spits out a 60 page report. We end up learning more about the leader than we like to say. Oftentimes their spouse or partner knows about them and it ends up being an incredible onboarding tool. So, uh, it drives self awareness. Especially we have a coach, uh, involved in the onboarding phase. So an executive will be coached by our Hogan certified consultant to basically share with them what their blind spots are, uh, how they tend to behave when they're derailed or in a moment of stress, how they tend to treat others, and how they lead through sometimes turbulent times. Right. And then it also, we coach the hiring manager how they can best work effectively with the new, uh, report. Uh, and oftentimes we'll have the hiring manager take the same Hogan, and then our consultant will coach both parties how to effectively work with one another. So I think the more you can truly, in that onboarding phase, be really open and honest and frankly, asking for feedback, uh, about yourself as a leader based on some of these assessments and tools is such a great start. Uh, for me, we do detailed reference checks too. And I've had a lot of CEOs and executives over the years say reference checks hold no weight. They mean nothing to me. They're only gonna give you the best. Right. Um, but what it does is it allows you, if they're done properly, it allows you to understand as the hiring team and as the leader, what their strengths and weaknesses are based off of their previous work experience. Experience. Uh, and so you don't spend 90 days trying to figure out their strengths and weaknesses.

Speaker A: Yeah. And, um, you know, for the Hogan, I like the Hogan because it's rooted in the big five, um, uh, factors of personality. I use deeper signals, which is similar but different. Um, but it has kind of the big five. And I think using a scientifically validated tool in those early days to give people that kind of early insight into ways of working, it's such a powerful tool technique.

Speaker B: Um, and I think does establish culture too, Josh. Right. It establishes a culture of, um, hey, we're here to learn together, grow together. Uh, and, hey, we have different strengths and weaknesses and that's what's going to make us a better team. That's going to go further together.

Speaker A: Certainly. Yeah. Kind of setting the tone of development and curiosity and not that everything has to be perfect but that we're still kind of adjusting to each other. It gives everybody the opportunity to kind of reflect on the fact that they are. That this is a transition and a reminder that they're not going to get it right the exact first time. Super critical. And and it's a great practice for kind of giving it to that their hiring uh, manager as well to kind of develop that relationship and so different directions.

Speaker B: You got it. It tells the new hire, wow, they're really invested in me. They really want to see my growth and self awareness is the first step to growth. Right.

Speaker A: So certainly. Yeah. And kind of thinking to those kind of past experiences and the new experience. If you think about kind of where they've come from and maybe they're in. In kind of the, the transition, you know, succession world. It's like is this person an outsider from industry or an outsider from just this organization or they are an insider. How do you conceptualize kind of the or or weight the outsider of industry versus outsider in industry but just going into a new organization versus an insider and how an organization can determine what they really need for a role.

Speaker B: Yeah. So this is a fun one. So I believe there's a lot of search professionals that I call uh, they take the cookie cutter approach. They believe that okay, this is a large fintech business that's looking to scale. We're only going to look at talent from fintech. Right. Or this is uh, a online retail business. Uh and we're only going to look at talent that comes from online retail. So that's not what every organization and every search requires to meet its business goals and objectives. So I can't tell you how many times uh, been doing this a long time as you shared. How many times an organization will come to us and say we want to disrupt, we want to innovate, we want to be the trailblazer in our industry. And then they keep pulling talent from within industry and they wonder why they're not innovating and they're not building new products and and right. And really becoming that trailblazer. Well guess what? It's because you continue to hire more of the same thinking. Right. So it depends again it goes back to what are the business goals and objectives and if innovation is an aspect of that business strategy, uh, then you must look at talent from within, from outside industry.

Speaker A: M. Wow. Such a great insight. Right. From those many different moments of seeing across roles and placements. Uh, because, you know, it's not always there's conventional wisdom and then there is kind of the practice in seeing what works. You know, you look at organizations who need somebody to shake it up, um, and getting somebody from the outside gives them that opportunity to kind of dig in to um, ask questions that maybe they get a little bit of leeway on and you know, because they're not, uh, biased by the current climate or our culture or ways of working and they get that pass. People give them a pass.

Speaker B: That's right. And I. So it's one reason why we're not, we don't go too deep in any one industry. We're industry agnostic and functionally focused. Right. Again, marketing, sales, tech, accounting, finance, HR ops. And it's from lower mid market it, we do work up to Fortune 50. So it's, it allows us to understand what industries are really driving the change within those functional areas of business. Right. So for example, the software industry is really good at lead generation and marketing. Right. And really good at creating online customer acquisition funnels. And so when a healthcare organization comes to us and they say we need to drive more leads online and convert those leads to the, to the call center, right. We're typically able to say, okay, well guess What? Education or SaaS, for example, those industries really are ahead of their time and far ahead of where healthcare is. So we're going to look at talent coming from these more progressive industries. And so it really is an advantage point. Wow.

Speaker A: Yeah. And so kind of thinking about these various ways of placing people and, and kind of across situations, uh, what is your version of a placement gone perfectly?

Speaker B: A great question. So a placement gone perfectly typically requires a. Similar to what we've, we've talked a bit about a, um, very detailed intake. So whether you're working with the search firm or you're conducting the search internally on your own, there is a very detailed knowledge gathering and intake session with any and all stakeholders. Right. And this is where we typically rip up job descriptions. Right. We're like, all right, let's actually talk about the business and where the business is looking to go. Let's talk about the resources we have today. And uh, then from there you're building a position profile. Right. And that profile is not, it's so much more than a job description. Right. It's a piece of marketing collateral that tells the story of the company, that tells the vision, where the business is going and why this role will make an impact in someone's career. And most importantly to attract the A players. They want the opportunities where they know that they can really move the needle. So being able to articulate the importance of the role, uh, for the organization, from there really distilling and determining what the search strategy is. Right. So similar to what we've talked about is it should we have 50% of the candidate slate come from industry, 50% come from outside industry. We do talk a lot about pie charts. Do we need an individual, for example, that, that has maybe come from enterprise, but they've spent the bulk of their career in lower mid market with scrappier budgets. Right. We do a lot of cleaning up hiring, uh, mistakes where a startup, um, hires a talent specifically from enterprise because they saw the Harvard MBA and they fell in love with the candidate on paper. Um, right. And so really determining what is the search strategy, who is it that we're looking for, what's their track record of success? And then determining what are the interview questions. How are we going to ensure that only the best talent gets through our filter? Uh, and obviously ensuring that again, if you're working with a search firm or conducting it internally, that there's headhunting involved. And head hunting is very different than recruiting. Right. Recruiting often can be. You're posting and praying. Right. You're posting a job and you're praying the right candidate applies. We don't, we do very little of that. Maybe 2% of that. Our postings are really more for marketing, uh, and branding for the firm, not how we fill jobs. Um, so ensuring that again against the search strategy, that your talent acquisition team is headhunting and really telling the story of the business, telling the story of the opportunity and hooking those passive job seekers who aren't looking. Right. And then ensuring that you're vetting the talent, uh, against the scorecard. It's been a very, you know, obviously a thoughtful point in, in, in the pro, in any search process and then, uh, having an already determined interview process. So the more you can determine what that interview process is up front, the better the candidate experience will be. Overall. I'm sure there's plenty of job seekers, um, listening where it's been weeks right between rounds that it just feels disjointed and unorganized. Um, oftentimes it's because they don't have that fluid interview process already designed prior to kicking off the search. And then from there, typically we like to see a final bake off and it's a final presentation again where you're taking the car for a test drive. Right. You're giving either a case study, it doesn't need to be on behalf of the prospective hiring managers challenges. Right. It can be just a basic case study as long as every candidate gets the same case study and then allowing them to present how they would tackle the challenge and then turn that into a work session. So you're getting a sense for really what it's like to work with the individual and then after that ensuring that you follow the steps like we talked about earlier in our conversation. Right. And ensuring alignment with the hiring manager. Having check ins the first 90 days is great. Critical. Hey, what do you think's going right? What's not going right? Having a neutral party do those retention call check ins. We do retention calls. We take it very seriously. Um, make sure that um, any concerns are uh, really addressed as quickly in the onboarding process as possible.

Speaker A: Wow. Super powerful. In terms of the kind of the data driven approach and that early intake, uh, it sounds like that intake informs a lot of what the program ends up looking like. Is that right?

Speaker B: It's everything. So sometimes that there's a lot we always say to our hiring teams, eat your Wheaties before the intake because it's a big brain dump. Right. And so the more we, we do that proper foundational work from, from the onset, the more successful the search is, the more successful the, the, the and and hiring decision is. Right. And, and setting that executive up for success. So, so yes, it's everything. And that's typically where we're coming in when mistakes have been made and we realize, wow, they weren't looking for the individual with the track record that the business needed. So it really wasn't the new hire's fault. It just wasn't the right process.

Speaker A: Yeah, certainly. I know from my own consulting work I leverage intakes as the core piece to any given engagement. If we're going to do work together, I have to talk to everybody and it has to be detailed and so I can get that picture and I have to sit with that data for a good period of time to really kind of set out the real story here. Like what's happening, where do we need to start?

Speaker B: It's important and it can feel slow. Right. To some of the stakeholders involved. They just want to get going. Right. But it can be detrimental if it's not done right.

Speaker A: Certainly, certainly. And so thinking about the whole conversation, kind of where we went, uh, from talking about the organization side to the client to the candidate side, um, is there anything we're missing here? Any kind of insights that are, that are coming to mind for you as we're having this conversation.

Speaker B: Gosh, you know, I would just say be picky for both parties, right? The hiring team and the job seeker. Really be thoughtful and intentional about your search. Right. Put it on paper. Really, you know, take the scoping the role very seriously. Scoping the KPIs very seriously for the job seeker is really thinking about where can you make the biggest impact. Right. Because those are the wins you want under your belt as you continue your evolving in your career. Right. Because want to go to every interview with look what I accomplished. Right. And so during that, you identify the right organization at the right stage of growth in the right industry with the right business goals that all fuel your strengths and really will be dependent upon your strengths to ultimately help that business achieve its goals. That's going to be the win, win for everyone. So, um, I just really would encourage everybody to be highly intentional, selective and picky on both sides of the table.

Speaker A: Yeah, be picky. All right. I like it. You know, so thanks, Camille, for taking the time to chat with us. Is there anything you'd like to share, uh, with the audience, uh, for what's going on with you or coming up for you or with talentfoot?

Speaker B: Sure. Well, I've become pretty obsessed with AI and uh, one of our missions is to not only identify the leaders of tomorrow, but to build the leaders of tomorrow. So we're busy hosting AI webinars workshops across the country and ensuring that we're not only future proofing the businesses that we serve, but also future proofing careers. So it's changing rapidly and we believe that, uh, the leaders, uh, of tomorrow, um, are embracing all aspects of this evolving team technology landscape and that the future leader is going to have to learn how to manage agents and humans.

Speaker A: Uh, yeah, agreed. It's a, uh, evolving space and it's evolving quickly and everyone's trying to wrap their head around it.

Speaker B: That's right. That's right. And uh, if you feel behind, you're not alone.

Speaker A: Yeah, certainly. And that's kind of the nice thing about it. Right. It's kind of like when you come into a new job, uh, you're not behind because you just started, so kind of start from there.

Speaker B: That's exactly right. And so for any job seekers that have time on their hands right now, I've been telling them it's actually to your advantage because you have time to really study AI. Uh, sign up. We have a partnership with Section School. It's a great AI academy. And just really go deep because when you go in for the interview and you're able to speak to how you can drive efficiencies and innovation with AI today, when your competition that may be gainfully employed in a full time position, they don't have necessarily the time to really stay ahead of these trends. That that's going to be your, your potential value proposition in your next interview.

Speaker A: There you go. Wonderful. Well, Camille, thanks so much for sharing everything with us. It's been super wonderful to have you on the show.

Speaker B: Thank you. It was a true honor.

Speaker A: Thanks so much for listening to the Land and Lead podcast. I'm your host, Dr. Josh Elmore. Tune in next time for more stories from leaders navigating high stakes role transitions.

Related episodes across the Index

Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.

  • 30. Scaling APAC: Why China, AI, and regional leadership cannot be managed from 10,000 km away - with Cedric DelzenneLeaders in Motion · on Executive search81 / 100
  • LinkedIn's First CHRO Steve Cadigan on AI Mistakes & OpportunitiesTalk Talent To Me · on Candidate experience78 / 100
  • 651. Chad Oakley, Current State of the Consulting Market in 2026Unleashed · on Executive search78 / 100
  • MicroConf Tactics: The Real Reason SaaS Customers Cancel (here's how to fix it)MicroConf On Air · on onboarding76 / 100
  • How a Startup Used a Single Threads Post to Land 10k SignupsMarketing for Startups with Fexingo · on onboarding74 / 100
  • Why Most Companies Are Optimizing Hiring the Wrong Way w/ - Kristen Habacht: CEO of EllyThe Business of Alignment · on Candidate experience66 / 100

More from Land and Lead

All episodes →
  • "Look in those white spaces" - Dr. Todd Grindal of SRI63 / 100
  • "Forget everything you knew about what you did in a traditional business" - Dave Kehr of Schaeffler65 / 100
  • "Alignment between our people, our systems and our strategies" - Reggie Newson of Wellpoint Care Network51 / 100
  • "Be the change you want to see" - Charles Newnam of Perceptyx72 / 100
  • "A Title Doesn't Earn You Respect, You Have to Earn Respect" - Kurtis Krentz of ALLO Fiber77 / 100
Explore the best B2B Leadership podcasts →
All Land and Lead episodes →