Invisible Machines podcast by UX Magazine · 2026-06-04 · 35 min
Most organizations treat a bigger context window like a cheat code: dump every document in, skip the data work, ship. Jonathan Frankle, Chief AI Scientist at Databricks, says that's still wrong. This is Jonathan's return visit to Invisible Machines - a conversation recorded last summer, released ahead of Databricks Data + AI Summit. His first appearance (season 2) was the MosaicML-era craft conversation: lottery tickets, mixology, mini-cupcakes. This one is the enterprise engineering thread: be a scientist, curate before you scale, and treat specification (what you actually want the system to do) as the bottleneck between raw model power and useful AI. Robb and Josh press him on the myths that still seduce enterprise teams: million-token windows as a substitute for real data work, hyperscaler résumés as a proxy for talent, and the fantasy that unlocking every PDF in the org automatically makes knowledge useful. Jonathan's answer is consistent: measure success, test your use case, climb the ladder of techniques, and accept that multimodal is where long context actually earns its keep, not as a universal bypass for curation. Along the way: the nuclear fusion vs.
The Checklist Your Deck Is Missing ft. Jeff McMillan77 / 100
When Agents Have Wallets, Trust Is Currency
No Strategy Without Vision ft Brian Evergreen | Invisible Machines
The Confabulation Machine ft. Evan Ratliff of Shell Game | Invisible Machines Podcast
Crisis Is Your Opening | Marina Nitze | Invisible Machines