The Finance Leader Podcast · 2026-07-29 · 21 min
Key moments - from our scoring
Substance score
34 / 100
Five dimensions, 20 points each
Most FP&A organizations invest heavily in ERP systems and reporting tools but fail to develop the strategic capabilities that drive executive influence. Stephen McLean argues that technical proficiency alone - budgeting, forecasting, variance analysis, financial modeling - doesn't translate to business partnership. The missing piece is deliberate development in business acumen, critical thinking, executive communication, financial storytelling, and stakeholder management. McLean presents a four-part framework: establishing why formal development plans are necessary (analysts don't naturally become strategic from routine work), defining the goal as developing trusted strategic business partners (not just skilled analysts), creating a culture of continuous improvement through knowledge-sharing and experimentation, and measuring success by decision-making quality and business influence rather than training completion metrics. He emphasizes immersing analysts in cross-functional collaboration, exposing them to real strategic decisions, and using mentorship to develop professional judgment. The episode targets finance leaders building or transforming FP&A capabilities and references Finance Leader Academy as a resource for developing strategic thinking, business partnering, executive communication, and AI proficiency in finance teams.
Most organizations train FP&A professionals exclusively on processes and software rather than developing strategic thinking, communication, executive presence, and business partnership skills, leaving them technically proficient but unable to translate analysis into actionable business recommendations.
Analysts should regularly spend time in operations, sales, marketing, supply chain, and other functional areas to understand business drivers; participate in strategic planning sessions, capital investment reviews, and acquisition analyses; and receive mentorship on how executives evaluate competing priorities and make decisions with incomplete information.
Success should be measured by technical excellence (forecast accuracy, reporting cycle time), analytical quality (number of strategic recommendations presented and implemented, scenarios evaluated), and whether executive meetings increasingly focus on recommendations rather than explaining historical results.
A true learning culture embeds professional development into daily work and team mindset by establishing continuous improvement as a core job responsibility, creating recurring knowledge-sharing sessions, and rewarding thoughtful experimentation rather than treating training as an optional annual activity.
Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.
The episode contains solid, relevant principles for FP&A development (immersing analysts in business, mentorship, continuous learning culture) that are valuable for finance leaders, but lacks concrete examples, case studies, or novel frameworks that would elevate it above standard industry guidance. Much of the content restates familiar best practices about strategic finance partnerships without demonstrating how these translate into measurable organizational impact or surprising findings.
Analysts don't often become strategic from routine work alone. Most FP and A professionals naturally become proficient in technical responsibilities such as budgeting and forecasting, variance analysis, financial modeling, and reporting through experience.
One of the most effective ways to develop strategic business partners is to immerse analysts in the business. They support every FP and a professional should regularly spend time with operations and sales, marketing, manufacturing, the supply chain team, customer service, and other functional areas to observe how work is performed and how value is created.
The core argument - that FP&A teams need training in strategic thinking beyond technical skills - is sound but widely discussed in finance leadership circles. The framework (formal plans, business immersion, mentorship, continuous learning) mirrors conventional wisdom. There are no contrarian takes, first-principles reframings, or surprising empirical evidence that distinguishes this from standard FP&A development literature.
Instead of developing strategic thinking, communication, executive presence, and business partnership, today's episode focuses on how finance leaders can intentionally build an FPA training program.
The ultimate objective of FP and A development is not to produce better analysts. It is to develop finance professionals who are trusted advisors that consistently improve the quality of business decisions.
This is a solo host episode with no guest. The host (Stephen McLean) appears to be a podcast operator and training consultant, but no practitioner or operator with demonstrated FP&A scale experience is interviewed to validate or challenge the frameworks presented.
I am your host Stephen McLean. This is the podcast for developing leaders in finance and accounting.
This episode is brought to you by Finance Leader Academy. If your FPA team is ready to move beyond reporting numbers and become trusted strategic business partners who are here to help, we help FP and A professionals strengthen strategic thinking, business partnering, executive communication, financial storytelling, forecasting, scenario modeling, and the effective use of artificial intelligence to deliver better business decisions.
The episode lacks named companies, specific metrics, timelines, or dollar figures to ground its claims. While it mentions measurement categories (forecast accuracy, scenario count, recommendation implementation rates), it provides no real data, case examples, or concrete implementation stories that would demonstrate how these principles have worked in practice. The AI mentions feel obligatory rather than evidence-based.
Metrics such as forecast accuracy, budget accuracy, reporting cycle time, variance, explanation quality, data quality, model reliability, and the percentage of automated reporting processes demonstrate whether the team is executing its core responsibilities efficiently.
Artificial intelligence accelerates this transformation, but it does not replace the need for critical thinking, curiosity, and trusted relationships.
This is a monologue, not a conversation, which severely limits the dimension score by design. There are no guest interactions, challenges, or genuine back-and-forth dialogue. The host delivers structured, well-organized content but lacks the dynamic questioning, productive disagreement, and follow-up probing that characterize strong conversational pedagogy. The delivery is instructional rather than exploratory.
Now let's talk about developing a training plan for the FP and A team. Number one why FP and A Needs a Formal Development Plan
Now for action Today does your FP and A team have a formal development strategy? Does every analyst have an individual development plan?
Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.
Send us Fan Mail Episode # 157: We walk through how we build an FP&A training plan that develops individual talent while raising the effectiveness of the whole finance organization. That starts with a formal development strategy, not ad hoc learning squeezed in when time allows. We talk about the capabilities that separate high-performing FP&A teams from strong reporting teams: business acumen, critical thinking, stakeholder management, leadership, decision support, and financial storytelling that makes recommendations clear and usable. We also get practical about how to turn analysts into trusted strategic business partners. That means immersing FP&A in the functions they support, teaching curiosity and root-cause thinking, and creating real exposure to strategic planning, capital decisions, pricing, product discussions, and post-implementation reviews. Along the way, we address how to build a culture of continuous improvement through peer learning and safe experimentation with automation and AI in FP&A, plus how to measure training success by impact, not courses completed.
Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.
Speaker A: M organizations invest heavily in ERP systems, business intelligence platforms, planning software, and reporting automation. Yet many FP and A teams still struggle to consistently influence executive decisions. The reason usually isn't technical capability is because many organizations train FP and A professionals almost exclusively on UM processes and software software. Instead of developing strategic thinking, communication, executive presence, and business partnership, today's episode focuses on how finance leaders can intentionally build an FPA training program that develops individual talent while simultaneously increasing the effectiveness of the entire finance organization. Please enjoy the episode welcome to the Finance Leader Podcast where Leadership is bigger than the numbers. I am your host Stephen McLean. This is the podcast for developing leaders in finance and accounting. Please consider following me on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn. My usernames and the links are in this episode's show notes. You can also follow Finance Leader Academy on, uh, LinkedIn. Thank you. This is episode number 157 and I'll be talking about developing a training plan for the FP and A team and I'll highlight the following topics. Number one why FPA needs a formal development plan. Number two Our goal is to develop strategic business partners. Number three Creating a culture of continuous improvement and four Measuring training success. Leonardo da Vinci said learning never exhausts the mind. I love learning and I love training. It definitely comes from my military roots of becoming better at your job. Always improving. But of course I have also worked in corporate FP and A where the daily and ongoing challenge is to find the time to train and to develop well. This is where leadership steps in to make it a priority to ensure that training and development, both individual time and team training, is built into the weekly schedule that we commit to it. Because this is what leaders do. We improve our people. I cannot stress this enough. One of our most important responsibilities as leaders is to grow other leaders. Build that concept into your own set of values. Last week I shared episode number 156, SWOT analysis for a Competitive Strategic Advantage from a Finance leader perspective. I share how CFOs and FP&A teams can anchor the process and data instead of opinion using profitability analysis, cash flow trends, ROI retention, productivity and operating metrics. To test assumptions, we dig into scenario planning and sensitivity analysis to model uncertainty, then cover how to convert SWOT themes into a strategy plan. So please listen if you have not already. Enjoy. This week I will be discussing the importance of training and developing the FP and A team. Training has always been important to me. How do we become better if we don't invest in ourselves and invest in our team? Now Some people do believe there's no time for it, and some organizations do not want to spend the time nor the funds to improve their team members. I don't understand this perspective. I don't get it at all. Please invest in your people Our goal is to grow strategic business partners who can find unique insights, who can help shape business decision making and who can help explain why what to do next? Not to report just what has happened, but to help senior leaders to see what the next steps should be. This requires a deeper understanding of what it means to find and apply insights to the strategy. It requires mentorship and development opportunities. Please subscribe to the podcast on the platform you're currently listening to and also please subscribe to my weekly email. When you subscribe to the email, you will receive a free guide about developing your finance leadership. It's filled with many tips and strategies to grow your leadership. Thank you. Now let's talk about developing a training plan for the FP and A team. Number one why FP and A Needs a Formal Development Plan Analysts don't often become strategic from routine work alone. Most FP and A professionals naturally become proficient in technical responsibilities such as budgeting and forecasting, variance analysis, financial modeling, and reporting through experience. While these skills are essential, they primarily focus on producing accurate financial information rather than influencing business decisions. Becoming a strategic finance partner requires deliberate development in areas such as business acumen, critical thinking, executive communication, financial storytelling, stakeholder management, leadership, and decision support. Without a structured development plan, individuals often remain highly skilled analysts but struggle to translate their analysis into actionable recommendations that shape organizational strategy. A formal development plan also ensures that learning aligns UH with the organization's long term strategic objectives. Instead of occurring in an ad hoc manner as business environments become increasingly dynamic, FP and A professionals must continuously expand their understanding of market trends and competitive forces, operational drivers, emerging technologies, and also artificial intelligence. A structured plan identifies competency gaps, establishes measurable development goals, and provides targeted learning opportunities that prepare finance professionals for greater responsibility. Rather than reacting to immediate business needs, the team proactively builds the knowledge and capabilities required to support future growth, strategic initiatives, and increasingly complex business decisions. Developing strategic FP and A capabilities also requires consistent exposure to cross functional collaboration and executive level interactions, which are rarely acquired through technical training alone. A formal development plan encourages finance professionals to work closely with leaders in operations and in sales, on the marketing team and supply chain, human resources, and also information technology to better understand how financial performance is created across the organization. These experiences help analysts connect financial data with operational realities, ask more insightful questions, anticipate business risks, and develop recommendations that are practical and aligned with organizational priorities. Now, Now. As trust grows between FP and A and business leaders, finance evolves from being viewed as a reporting function to becoming a valued strategic advisor. Our goal is to develop strategic business partners. The ultimate objective of FP and A development is not to produce better analysts. It is to develop finance professionals who are trusted advisors that consistently improve the quality of business decisions. Technical excellence remains the foundation of the profession, but it is no longer sufficient. Organizations derive the greatest value from FPA when analysts understand the business as well as they understand the financial statements, anticipate challenges before they occur, and influence leaders through sound judgment and practical recommendations. Developing these capabilities requires intentional experiences that extend far beyond traditional finance training. One of the most effective ways to develop strategic business partners is to immerse analysts in the business. They support every FP and a professional should regularly spend time with operations and sales, marketing, manufacturing, the supply chain team, customer service, and other functional areas to observe how work is performed and how value is created. Rather than analyzing numbers in isolation, they should understand the operational drivers behind revenue growth, cost structure, customer behavior, production efficiency, and organizational constraints. When analysts understand the business firsthand, their financial analysis becomes significantly more relevant and their recommendations become more practical and actionable. Finance leaders should also teach analysts to approach every assignment with curiosity. Instead of simply completing a reporting requirement. Rather than asking, did I finish the variance report? They should ask, what story are these numbers telling us? And what decisions should leadership make because of this information? Encourage analysts to investigate root causes, identify emerging trends, challenge assumptions, and quantify risks and opportunities. The goal is to develop professionals who naturally seek to explain why performance changed and what actions management should consider next. Developing business judgment requires exposing analysts to real decision making processes. Rather than limiting participation to monthly reporting meetings, finance leaders should intentionally involve FP and A professionals in strategic planning sessions, product development discussions, capital investment reviews, pricing decisions, acquisition analyses, operational improvement initiatives, and post implementation reviews. Seeing how executives evaluate competing priorities helps analysts understand that strategic decisions involve balancing financial returns, operational realities, customer needs, organizational capabilities, and risk, not simply maximizing a financial metric. Mentorship is another critical component of developing trusted advisors. Experienced finance leaders should regularly review analyses with junior analysts, not only correcting technical errors but discussing how executives will interpret the information, what additional questions may arise, and how recommendations could be strengthened. These conversations accelerate the development of professional judgment, which is difficult to acquire through classroom training alone. Analysts benefit greatly from hearing how experienced leaders think through uncertainty, communicate trade offs, and make recommendations when information is incomplete. Number three Creating a Culture of Continuous Improvement Creating a culture of continuous learning within an FP and a organization requires much more than offering occasional training courses or scheduling quarterly workshops. A true learning culture exists when professional development becomes part of the team's daily work rather than an activity reserved for annual training plans. The objective is to develop intellectually curious finance professionals who continuously seek better ways to analyze information, solve business problems, create value for the organization. When learning becomes embedded in the team's mindset, FP&A evolves from a reactive reporting function into a proactive strategic partner. Finance leadership must establish the expectation that learning is part of every analyst's job description. Too often, development is viewed as something employees do only when time permits. Instead, leaders should explicitly communicate that um, improving technical skills, business knowledge, communication, leadership, and strategic thinking is a core responsibility. This expectation should be reflected in performance evaluations, promotion criteria, and career development discussions. Analysts should understand that career advancement depends not only on producing accurate work but also on demonstrating continuous growth and expanding their ability to influence organizational decisions. One of the most effective ways to reinforce continuous learning is through regular knowledge sharing within the FP and a team. Every team member develops unique expertise through projects, stakeholder interactions, or external training, so creating recurring opportunities for analysts to teach one another transforms individual learning into organizational capability. Monthly learning sessions might include demonstrations of new forecasting techniques, lessons learned from recent budget cycles, presentations on emerging industry trends, or discussions of how artificial intelligence was used to improve a recent analysis, teaching others reinforces the presenter's own understanding while exposing the entire team to new ideas. Finance leaders should also normalize experimentation. Analysts should be encouraged to test new forecasting approaches, visualization techniques, automation opportunities, AI prompts, dashboard designs, and analytical methodologies without fear of criticism. If an experiment does not produce the expected result. Organizations that reward thoughtful experimentations often discover significant improvements in efficiency and insight Generation M because employees become comfortable challenging existing processes rather than simply following established routines. A culture that values innovation encourages analysts to ask, is there a better way to do this instead of accepting current practices as permanent? 4. Measuring training success the effectiveness of an FP and a training program should never be measured solely by the number of courses completed or certifications earned. Those metrics indicate activity not impact. The true purpose of FP and a development is to improve the quality of organizational decision making, strengthen business partnerships, and ultimately contribute to better business performance. Therefore, success should be evaluated by measuring how the team's behaviors, capabilities, and business influence change over time. The question finance leaders should continually ask is not did our team complete the training? But rather, is our team Making the Business Better because of what they learned the first area to measure is technical excellence because it provides the foundation for strategic partnership. Analysts must consistently produce accurate, timely, and reliable financial information before executives will trust their recommendations. Metrics such as forecast accuracy, budget accuracy, reporting cycle time, variance, explanation quality, data quality, model reliability, and the percentage of automated reporting processes demonstrate whether the team is executing its core responsibilities efficiently. While these measures alone do not define strategic FP&A, poor technical performance will undermine the team's credibility with business leaders. The second category should focus on analytical quality and strategic insight. Instead of simply counting reports produced, organizations should evaluate whether FP and A is delivering actionable recommendations that influence decisions. Finance leaders might measure the number of strategic recommendations presented to leadership, the percentage of recommendations accepted and implemented, the number of scenarios evaluated before major business decisions, or the frequency with which analysts identify emerging risks and opportunities and before they become significant issues. Another valuable measure is with our executive meetings increasingly focus on discussing recommendations rather than explaining historical financial results. When leadership spends less time asking what happened? And more time asking what should we do next? FP&A is Becoming more strategic now for action Today does your FP and A team have a formal development strategy? Does every analyst have an individual development plan? Is time intentionally set aside each week for learning and continuous improvement? Has your organization invested the financial resources needed to develop strategic finance capabilities, leadership skills, business acumen, and AI proficiency? If not, now is the time to change that. Evaluate where your FP and A team stands today. Identify the gaps between reporting results and driving decisions, and create a deliberate development plan. The organizations with the most strategic finance teams don't get there by accident. They build them through consistent investment in their people. Now this episode is brought to you by Finance Leader Academy. If your FPA team is ready to move beyond reporting numbers and become trusted strategic business partners who are here to help, we help FP and A professionals strengthen strategic thinking, business partnering, executive communication, financial storytelling, forecasting, scenario modeling, and the effective use of artificial intelligence to deliver better business decisions. Whether you're developing a new analyst or transforming an entire finance organization, our UH training equips your team with the skills and needed to create measurable organizational value. Learn more@financeleaderacademy.com Today I talked about developing a training plan for the FP and A team, and I highlighted the following points. Number one why FP and A needs a formal development plan. Number two our goal is to develop strategic business partners. Number three creating a culture of continuous improvement and four measuring training success. The future of FP&A belongs to professionals who combine analytical rigor with business judgment, effective communication, and technological fluency. Organizations that intentionally invest in developing these capabilities will create finance teams that do more than produce accurate forecasts. They will shape strategy, influence capital allocation, identify emerging risks, uncover growth opportunities, and become indispensable partners to executive leadership. Artificial intelligence accelerates this transformation, but it does not replace the need for critical thinking, curiosity, and trusted relationships. The organizations that thrive will be those that develop both their people and their technology together. I hope you enjoyed the Finance Leader podcast. If this episode helped you today, please share with a colleague and leave a review. Please check out financeladeracademy.com for more resources and for ways that I can help you and your team. And now go lead your team and I'll see you next time. Thank you.
Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.