Don’t Count Your Dollars Yet! The Truth About PE Valuations
Private Equity Experience · 2026-05-22 · 39 min
Substance score
41 / 100
Five dimensions, 20 points each
What our scoring noted
Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.
Insight Density
The episode has a core substantive thread around moral hazard in PE valuations and the subjectivity of mark-to-market, but a large portion of runtime is spent on basic definitional explanations (what is private credit, what is a loan) for the least-experienced host, plus significant crosstalk filler. The payoff insights exist but are diluted.
somebody that runs a fund might be incentivized to keep a value inflated for just a little while, uh, while we work this other portfolio company out so that they don't, as Ed said, lose that denominator from which their 2% asset management fees calculate off of
you can engineer yourself out of taking big losses or you can engineer gains
Originality
The moral hazard framing around PE valuation inflation tied to fee income is the most interesting angle, but it is a widely-discussed critique in PE circles rather than a fresh contrarian argument. The rest of the episode is definitional and explanatory with no first-principles or counterintuitive claims.
people aren't rushing to mark things down, let me just tell you that. Like, unless they've already sold the asset and they're getting some tax benefit from it
it's kind of like they are figure skating of the Olympics, where like figure skaters are athletic, but they have these weird scores
Guest Caliber
Ed and Rory are genuine practitioners with 20+ years in private credit and PE deal work, and they reference first-hand deal experience with specific counterparties. However, there are no external guests, Emily is a generalist host, and the hosts are not identifiable as senior principals at named funds.
the deal that we had with RBS Greenwich was essentially they let us borrow to buy big portfolios of bankrupt consumer debt
Ed and I, a-again, we worked at a company together where we built an entire system where we would literally test thousands of portfolios in an automated fashion every single... We did it monthly, actually, but we reported quarterly
Specificity & Evidence
The RBS Greenwich Capital deal provides genuine specificity with real numbers (95% LTV, $10/account servicing strip, 80% cash flow split post-payback), and the real estate structuring example uses concrete rates and timelines. However, a meaningful portion of numbers elsewhere are hypothetical illustrations rather than real data points.
They would lend us, on the first deal we did with them, 95% of the purchase
for the first two years it's interest only at a twelve percent rate. And then once the apartment building goes live, you start paying principal, and then your interest rate drops to eight percent or seven percent
Conversational Craft
Emily asks functional clarifying questions that keep the conversation accessible, but they are largely basic definitional prompts rather than probing follow-ups. There is no meaningful pushback between hosts, the dialogue is heavily fragmented with crosstalk and incomplete sentences, and the episode drifts without a sharp moderating hand.
is this article saying there should be more of the impairment checks
So is it, um, these types of loans a normal bank wouldn't take 'cause they're too risky or just because they're structured in a kind of a way?
Conversation analysis
Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the verbal tics along the way.
Filler words
Episode notes
Is the "Crazy Math" of private markets masking the truth about your investments? In this episode of the Private Equity Experience Podcast , hosts Rory Leaphart, Ed Barton, and Emily Sander break down a recent Wall Street Journal article titled "The Crazy Math Confronting Everyday Investors in Private Markets." If you’ve ever wondered how private equity and private credit funds actually value their portfolios and whether those numbers are real or just subjective "engineering," this episode is your backstage pass. What we cover in this episode: Private Credit vs. Private Equity: The fundamental differences between lending assets and ownership stakes. The "Squishy" Valuation Game: Why private equity valuations are like Olympic figure skating scores: highly subjective, beautifully modeled, and sometimes massaged to protect management fees. Impairments & "Loss Harvesting": How managers strategically offset massive home runs by dumping underperforming assets at the exact right time. Non-Traditional Structures: The truth about escalators, profit participations, and structured notes that traditional banks won't touch.
Full transcript
39 minTranscribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.
1 00:00:07,049 - > 00:00:09,839 Welcome to the Private Equity Experience Podcast. 2 00:00:10,109 - > 00:00:13,650 Your backstage pass to the strategies, stories, and secrets 3 00:00:13,859 - > 00:00:16,589 that drive value in the PE universe. 4 00:00:16,920 - > 00:00:20,519 No filters, no fluff, just straight talk and expert 5 00:00:20,519 - > 00:00:24,059 insights to help you navigate the private equity world with 6 00:00:24,065 - > 00:00:24,475 confidence. 7 00:00:25,440 - > 00:00:30,600 And now your hosts, ed Barton, Rory Leaphart, and Emily Sander. 8 00:00:34,250 - > 00:00:34,640 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 9 00:00:34,990 - > 00:00:36,340 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_: like your necklace by the way, dude. 10 00:00:36,340 - > 00:00:37,130 Is that like a, is 11 00:00:37,960 - > 00:00:38,450 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2: Thanks. 12 00:00:38,570 - > 00:00:39,600 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_: Etsy buy or...? 13 00:00:40,060 - > 00:00:41,579 rory-liebhart_1_05-15: Actually, it is, as a matter of fact. 14 00:00:41,579 - > 00:00:42,030 Yes. 15 00:00:42,149 - > 00:00:42,600 Yep. 16 00:00:42,909 - > 00:00:44,960 It is an Etsy buy. 17 00:00:44,960 - > 00:00:46,159 Spot on, actually. 18 00:00:46,719 - > 00:00:46,990 Yeah. 19 00:00:47,600 - > 00:00:48,000 Yeah. 20 00:00:48,130 - > 00:00:48,619 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: Yeah. 21 00:00:48,770 - > 00:00:49,060 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 22 00:00:49,179 - > 00:00:49,679 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: No, I love 23 00:00:49,859 - > 00:00:50,350 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2: Thanks. 24 00:00:50,429 - > 00:00:50,689 Yeah. 25 00:00:50,899 - > 00:00:51,170 Yeah. 26 00:00:52,149 - > 00:00:52,909 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_: Very cool. 27 00:00:52,979 - > 00:00:53,600 Okay. 28 00:00:54,689 - > 00:01:00,079 Big Riggs, manly Etsy necklace man, um, you came up with the 29 00:01:00,079 - > 00:01:04,120 Wall Street Journal article that, uh, I could not read'cause 30 00:01:04,120 - > 00:01:08,090 I'm not fancy like you and subscribed to that, but it, the 31 00:01:08,090 - > 00:01:09,549 title was Crazy Math. 32 00:01:09,739 - > 00:01:10,069 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_1: it was, 33 00:01:10,129 - > 00:01:11,480 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: And so what, what, 34 00:01:11,750 - > 00:01:11,989 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 35 00:01:12,120 - > 00:01:13,230 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_: what is this article about? 36 00:01:13,230 - > 00:01:14,370 What's it talking about? 37 00:01:14,459 - > 00:01:15,980 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_1: it i- the, the article was a Wall 38 00:01:15,980 - > 00:01:17,930 Street Journal article published a couple weeks ago. 39 00:01:17,959 - > 00:01:21,609 It was called"The Crazy Math Confronting Everyday Investors 40 00:01:21,609 - > 00:01:25,640 in Private Markets." And these articles are clickbait in a lot 41 00:01:25,640 - > 00:01:28,549 of ways, which clicked me in, and I was baited and hooked to 42 00:01:28,549 - > 00:01:29,890 read it. 43 00:01:29,890 - > 00:01:32,359 And, uh, this one was actually about really bringing into 44 00:01:32,359 - > 00:01:36,829 context today how there's this perception that private credit, 45 00:01:36,829 - > 00:01:40,489 which is an asset class of its own, but different than private 46 00:01:40,489 - > 00:01:44,340 equity credit being, you know, debt financing versus equity 47 00:01:44,340 - > 00:01:48,459 being, you know, um, ownership, if you will, rather than lending 48 00:01:48,459 - > 00:01:50,079 to the, to the folks listening out there. 49 00:01:50,480 - > 00:01:53,099 Um, you know, there's been this, there's been a couple public- 50 00:01:53,250 - > 00:01:56,939 publicized stories where, you know, big investors in private 51 00:01:56,939 - > 00:02:00,799 credit funds have, um, you know, redeemed from the funds that 52 00:02:00,799 - > 00:02:04,090 they are in, and so the funds themselves are, you know, i- in 53 00:02:04,140 - > 00:02:06,239 some ways struggling with liquidity. 54 00:02:06,239 - > 00:02:08,259 Although, I think, I think the story's been overblown. 55 00:02:08,360 - > 00:02:12,099 But the point is that this article is saying,"Hey, um, 56 00:02:12,099 - > 00:02:14,710 private, private credit funds are having problems with 57 00:02:14,710 - > 00:02:19,770 investors leaving based on performance of their loan 58 00:02:19,770 - > 00:02:23,590 portfolios." So you have a couple bad loans go, or a couple 59 00:02:23,590 - > 00:02:26,430 loans go bad, investors say,"Oh, I don't want any one of - I 60 00:02:26,430 - > 00:02:27,800 don't want any more of this asset class. 61 00:02:27,800 - > 00:02:29,789 I gotta get out of it." That's the perception. 62 00:02:30,300 - > 00:02:32,219 Um, they're comparing it to private equity, which is a 63 00:02:32,370 - > 00:02:35,669 different asset class for a variety of reasons. 64 00:02:36,159 - > 00:02:39,800 Um, and the, the, the thought that maybe that if there's 65 00:02:39,900 - > 00:02:42,939 performance issues within private, private equity funds, 66 00:02:43,349 - > 00:02:46,229 that maybe investors would get scared and, and run away too, 67 00:02:46,419 - > 00:02:49,020 which, you know, I don't think that's ever gonna happen en 68 00:02:49,020 - > 00:02:49,419 masse. 69 00:02:49,520 - > 00:02:52,840 But, um, one of the things that was brought up in this, and this 70 00:02:52,840 - > 00:02:56,000 is where, you know, we can kinda talk about some more esoteric 71 00:02:56,000 - > 00:02:59,879 elements, is that- Um, private credit funds, how they account 72 00:02:59,879 - > 00:03:02,680 for their portfolio is very different than private equity 73 00:03:02,680 - > 00:03:07,479 funds because, uh, a private credit fund is, uh, is making 74 00:03:07,530 - > 00:03:11,509 loans to middle market companies or other, other funds and things 75 00:03:11,509 - > 00:03:12,300 like that. 76 00:03:12,610 - > 00:03:15,199 And so their upside is capped, so they're basically accounting 77 00:03:15,199 - > 00:03:17,710 for losses, but they're not re- they can't really reap more 78 00:03:17,710 - > 00:03:21,599 gains than what their, their, their coupon is really, and, and 79 00:03:21,599 - > 00:03:23,280 some other small elements to that. 80 00:03:23,689 - > 00:03:27,300 Whereas private equity funds book gains on the acquisition of 81 00:03:27,300 - > 00:03:28,800 their portfolio companies. 82 00:03:28,889 - > 00:03:33,560 So there's some, there's some esoteric gain on purchase and 83 00:03:33,560 - > 00:03:37,610 sale, uh, math that goes into it, and how that plays out is, 84 00:03:38,110 - > 00:03:41,449 um, you know, some managers are incentivized based on fund 85 00:03:41,449 - > 00:03:43,569 performance, and fund performance is dictated by the 86 00:03:43,569 - > 00:03:45,150 way some of the accounting rules work. 87 00:03:45,389 - > 00:03:47,710 It's not just always just based on cash flow. 88 00:03:48,289 - > 00:03:51,080 So it just brought up a whole host of questions around, well, 89 00:03:51,080 - > 00:03:54,560 what is, how do, how, how is private, private equity account 90 00:03:54,560 - > 00:03:57,330 for performance of its portfolio? 91 00:03:57,699 - > 00:04:02,560 How does it mark that to market as it should be on a quarterly 92 00:04:02,560 - > 00:04:03,879 basis, yada, yada, yada. 93 00:04:03,879 - > 00:04:07,740 So it was kind of like a clickbaity story, but it made, 94 00:04:07,740 - > 00:04:11,360 uh, me think about, hey, maybe our listeners wanna know all 95 00:04:11,360 - > 00:04:15,300 about the ways in which the accounting for, um, acquisitions 96 00:04:15,300 - > 00:04:18,480 of companies and, and participations in companies, uh, 97 00:04:18,480 - > 00:04:20,529 is booked on the balance sheet and tested. 98 00:04:20,769 - > 00:04:22,269 Probably not, but maybe they are. 99 00:04:22,310 - > 00:04:22,720 Who knows? 100 00:04:26,435 - > 00:04:28,194 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_13: I, I'm sure all two of the 101 00:04:28,194 - > 00:04:30,814 listeners left are intrigued by this, this topic. 102 00:04:31,204 - > 00:04:31,605 Um, 103 00:04:32,040 - > 00:04:32,329 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 104 00:04:32,454 - > 00:04:35,035 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_: just to like for, for my refresher, 105 00:04:35,225 - > 00:04:38,665 uh, private credit is like the, the debt side. 106 00:04:38,754 - > 00:04:39,254 So 107 00:04:39,480 - > 00:04:39,740 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 108 00:04:40,035 - > 00:04:41,865 emily-sander_1_05-15-202: rattle off some common examples just so 109 00:04:41,865 - > 00:04:42,274 people... 110 00:04:42,389 - > 00:04:45,339 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_: Uh, as far as names go, like, uh, 111 00:04:45,339 - > 00:04:49,129 Blue Owl Capital, Castle Lake, and then you, you know, as 112 00:04:49,129 - > 00:04:51,819 we've, as Ed and I have mentioned before, like you have 113 00:04:52,329 - > 00:04:56,050 big firms that have both private equity and a private credit, uh, 114 00:04:56,160 - > 00:04:58,269 you know, call it, you know, business. 115 00:04:58,269 - > 00:05:01,019 So Blackstone would be an example of that, something like 116 00:05:01,019 - > 00:05:01,300 that. 117 00:05:01,939 - > 00:05:04,829 So big, big funds, billions and billions and billions of 118 00:05:04,829 - > 00:05:05,540 dollars. 119 00:05:05,564 - > 00:05:06,925 emily-sander_1_05-15-202: What - But what's like a... 120 00:05:10,214 - > 00:05:10,754 Okay. 121 00:05:11,504 - > 00:05:13,915 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-202: Now your, your challenge here, as 122 00:05:13,915 - > 00:05:19,204 Rory kind of noted, is liquidity when it comes to private debt is 123 00:05:19,204 - > 00:05:22,024 a different animal than it is for private equity even. 124 00:05:22,024 - > 00:05:22,384 Because 125 00:05:22,649 - > 00:05:23,139 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 126 00:05:23,154 - > 00:05:25,084 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-202: you think about kind of the nature 127 00:05:25,084 - > 00:05:26,694 of debt, it's a fixed... 128 00:05:26,824 - > 00:05:31,084 normally a fixed term instrument that you're lending. 129 00:05:31,084 - > 00:05:38,204 And you're lending knowing the risk profile of that borrower is 130 00:05:38,204 - > 00:05:41,444 not bankable or 131 00:05:41,714 - > 00:05:42,334 emily-sander_1_05-15-: bankable. 132 00:05:42,439 - > 00:05:45,379 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-202: So, so no normal bank is gonna 133 00:05:45,379 - > 00:05:47,420 extend credit to that borrower. 134 00:05:48,459 - > 00:05:50,100 They're probably pre-profit. 135 00:05:50,230 - > 00:05:51,069 They're, they're... 136 00:05:51,250 - > 00:05:52,540 They may be pre-revenue. 137 00:05:52,540 - > 00:05:55,740 They have - And so normally with these private credit, there's, 138 00:05:55,899 - > 00:05:59,709 there's structuring in the private credit instrument you 139 00:05:59,709 - > 00:06:02,199 know, potentially allows for warrants 140 00:06:02,649 - > 00:06:02,870 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 141 00:06:03,319 - > 00:06:04,689 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2026: or something which is an 142 00:06:04,689 - > 00:06:07,769 opportunity to buy equity when the company becomes successful. 143 00:06:07,800 - > 00:06:13,180 Or there's, you know, different escalators on repayment, or it's 144 00:06:13,180 - > 00:06:15,779 gonna be cashflow-driven repayment as opposed to a 145 00:06:15,779 - > 00:06:18,860 steady, you know, you pay back $10,000 a month plus interest. 146 00:06:18,860 - > 00:06:21,860 It's gonna be, you know, if your revenue is this, if you pay back 147 00:06:21,860 - > 00:06:22,040 this 148 00:06:22,240 - > 00:06:22,579 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 149 00:06:22,610 - > 00:06:24,370 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15: revenue is less, you pay less, and if 150 00:06:24,370 - > 00:06:25,689 your revenue is more, you pay more. 151 00:06:26,069 - > 00:06:29,699 There's a structuring in those that allows what would otherwise 152 00:06:29,699 - > 00:06:35,189 be a non-creditworthy borrower to borrow the money, and the 153 00:06:35,189 - > 00:06:39,560 folks lending into that space are essentially, you know, 154 00:06:39,560 - > 00:06:41,910 again, they're looking for private equity type returns. 155 00:06:41,910 - > 00:06:45,550 Private credit is, is looking for similar returns to private 156 00:06:45,550 - > 00:06:48,860 equity because got a, a similar risk premium. 157 00:06:49,644 - > 00:06:51,865 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_13: So for private credit, you're the 158 00:06:51,939 - > 00:06:52,300 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: Yes. 159 00:06:53,035 - > 00:06:54,214 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: and then just give me an example of 160 00:06:54,214 - > 00:06:56,625 like what type of loan I would - like what type of loans are we 161 00:06:56,625 - > 00:06:57,245 talking about? 162 00:06:57,509 - > 00:07:00,600 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_: Uh, construction loan perhaps, or an 163 00:07:00,600 - > 00:07:02,360 infrastructure building loan. 164 00:07:02,360 - > 00:07:06,009 So just, just what Ed said is, like, it's not that sophist - I 165 00:07:06,009 - > 00:07:08,819 mean, it's not that complicated in the sense that it's no 166 00:07:08,819 - > 00:07:11,860 different than taking out a personal loan, you know, for ten 167 00:07:11,860 - > 00:07:14,230 grand that you pay o- back over three, three years. 168 00:07:14,230 - > 00:07:17,589 In this case, it's like you're taking out, you know, tens of 169 00:07:17,589 - > 00:07:20,110 millions, hundreds of millions of dollars that you are agreeing 170 00:07:20,110 - > 00:07:24,620 to pay back principal and interest in, you know, five 171 00:07:24,620 - > 00:07:25,399 years, ten years. 172 00:07:25,790 - > 00:07:27,240 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-202: So, and let me get, let me, let me 173 00:07:27,240 - > 00:07:28,839 give a real-life example Rory and I 174 00:07:29,069 - > 00:07:29,379 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 175 00:07:29,459 - > 00:07:32,399 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2026: We dealt with the old RBS Greenwich 176 00:07:32,399 - > 00:07:34,279 Capital back 20 years 177 00:07:34,360 - > 00:07:34,709 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 178 00:07:34,959 - > 00:07:35,060 Yeah. 179 00:07:35,379 - > 00:07:37,430 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-202: and the deal that we had with RBS 180 00:07:37,430 - > 00:07:42,660 Greenwich was essentially they let us borrow to buy big 181 00:07:42,660 - > 00:07:45,740 portfolios of bankrupt consumer debt. 182 00:07:46,879 - > 00:07:50,889 They would lend us, on the first deal we did with them, 95% of 183 00:07:50,889 - > 00:07:51,269 the purchase 184 00:07:51,540 - > 00:07:51,949 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: Yep. 185 00:07:52,779 - > 00:07:53,110 Yeah. 186 00:07:53,949 - > 00:07:54,259 Mm-hmm. 187 00:07:54,600 - > 00:07:55,949 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-202: And they said,"Okay, now you..." And 188 00:07:55,949 - > 00:07:58,470 then you'd get this little, what they call a servicing strip. 189 00:07:58,620 - > 00:08:02,290 So they would go,"You could get $10 per account to manage it." 190 00:08:03,350 - > 00:08:06,939 as cash flow comes in, we get all the cash flow except for a 191 00:08:06,939 - > 00:08:09,430 small amount to repay principal plus interest. 192 00:08:09,459 - > 00:08:12,420 And then once the loan's paid back, we get 80% of the cash 193 00:08:12,420 - > 00:08:13,230 flow after that. 194 00:08:14,990 - > 00:08:17,500 So that, that's 195 00:08:17,694 - > 00:08:17,904 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: yeah. 196 00:08:18,060 - > 00:08:20,279 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2026_: a classic private, kind of private 197 00:08:20,279 - > 00:08:25,329 credit experience where the, the structure of that note is done 198 00:08:25,329 - > 00:08:27,439 in such a way that no bank would ever do that. 199 00:08:27,860 - > 00:08:30,480 But RBS Greenwich Capital was kinda like their 200 00:08:32,720 - > 00:08:35,789 non-traditional - Was RBS, Royal Bank of Scotland's 201 00:08:35,830 - > 00:08:39,580 non-traditional, non-traditional arm, and they made loans like 202 00:08:39,580 - > 00:08:40,240 that all the time 203 00:08:41,195 - > 00:08:41,784 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: Okay, wait. 204 00:08:41,815 - > 00:08:42,955 I gotta back up'cause my, 205 00:08:43,215 - > 00:08:47,215 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-20: Hmm? 206 00:08:47,274 - > 00:08:51,659 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: um, So private credit, I'm a lender. 207 00:08:51,690 - > 00:08:52,649 This is a loan. 208 00:08:53,519 - > 00:08:57,169 And so the whole mechanism is kind of flipped from private 209 00:08:57,169 - > 00:08:57,690 equity. 210 00:08:58,139 - > 00:08:58,799 So y-y... 211 00:09:00,044 - > 00:09:00,544 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 212 00:09:00,690 - > 00:09:01,350 emily-sander_1_05-15-: category. 213 00:09:02,389 - > 00:09:06,389 And then, so the way I earn money in private credit, you 214 00:09:06,389 - > 00:09:07,659 said, Rory, it was capped. 215 00:09:07,659 - > 00:09:10,340 Like, what are like the basic mechanics of like you, you give 216 00:09:10,340 - > 00:09:13,009 a loan and then you get the loan repaid 217 00:09:13,174 - > 00:09:13,715 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-20: That's it. 218 00:09:13,774 - > 00:09:14,044 Yeah. 219 00:09:14,269 - > 00:09:15,789 emily-sander_1_05: supp-supposed to be predictable and 220 00:09:15,865 - > 00:09:16,195 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 221 00:09:16,225 - > 00:09:18,375 I mean, uh, y- that, that's the way to think about it. 222 00:09:18,375 - > 00:09:21,875 Now, of course, again, what Ed said is also true, is there's 223 00:09:21,875 - > 00:09:25,995 usually some sort of equity incentive or kicker, if you 224 00:09:25,995 - > 00:09:32,085 will, to that the lender is granted by - for doing that 225 00:09:32,085 - > 00:09:32,445 loan. 226 00:09:32,554 - > 00:09:34,054 But by and large, that's 227 00:09:34,169 - > 00:09:34,600 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: And this... 228 00:09:35,674 - > 00:09:36,434 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-20: that's a whole'nother... 229 00:09:36,835 - > 00:09:38,894 Just think about it this, the difference between that and 230 00:09:38,894 - > 00:09:41,825 private equity is like private equity wins when they buy a 231 00:09:41,825 - > 00:09:45,445 company low, do a bunch of stuff operationally and financially, 232 00:09:45,485 - > 00:09:46,205 and sell it high. 233 00:09:46,605 - > 00:09:47,754 The difference is their profit. 234 00:09:47,884 - > 00:09:51,845 Well, for a private credit fund, they just make money on that 235 00:09:51,845 - > 00:09:53,154 interest that they're charging. 236 00:09:54,850 - > 00:09:55,389 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: Okay. 237 00:09:55,620 - > 00:09:55,919 Okay. 238 00:09:55,919 - > 00:09:56,019 So 239 00:09:56,075 - > 00:09:56,205 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 240 00:09:56,259 - > 00:09:56,289 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_130: a 241 00:09:56,664 - > 00:09:57,965 rory-liebhart_1_05-1: Completely different category. 242 00:09:58,315 - > 00:09:58,644 Yeah. 243 00:09:59,379 - > 00:10:00,409 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_: this would be like kind of 244 00:10:00,725 - > 00:10:01,075 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 245 00:10:01,575 - > 00:10:02,335 Y- yes. 246 00:10:02,365 - > 00:10:02,715 Yeah. 247 00:10:02,759 - > 00:10:03,370 emily-sander_1_05-: reluctantly, 248 00:10:03,455 - > 00:10:04,105 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: yeah, I 249 00:10:04,299 - > 00:10:04,559 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: Okay. 250 00:10:06,575 - > 00:10:06,975 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: yes. 251 00:10:06,975 - > 00:10:07,325 Yeah. 252 00:10:07,375 - > 00:10:09,815 There's obviously, you know, lots of caveats to that. 253 00:10:09,815 - > 00:10:12,325 Of course, there's different gradations and grades of loans 254 00:10:12,325 - > 00:10:16,095 and, uh, ratings and things like that, um, that, you know, the 255 00:10:16,095 - > 00:10:19,945 highest quality private equity play could be, um, less risky 256 00:10:19,945 - > 00:10:22,215 than the lowest quality credit play. 257 00:10:22,215 - > 00:10:23,804 But yeah, I mean, that's the way to think about it. 258 00:10:24,539 - > 00:10:28,820 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: So, so is it, um, these types of 259 00:10:28,820 - > 00:10:32,100 loans a normal bank wouldn't take'cause they're too risky or 260 00:10:32,100 - > 00:10:36,210 just because they're structured in a kind of a way? 261 00:10:36,595 - > 00:10:36,875 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 262 00:10:36,945 - > 00:10:38,325 Both, both are largely true. 263 00:10:38,325 - > 00:10:38,575 Yeah. 264 00:10:38,705 - > 00:10:39,095 Exactly. 265 00:10:39,754 - > 00:10:41,414 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-20: Now, the, the issue, as Rory was 266 00:10:41,414 - > 00:10:45,404 noting, is you've got - these have two elements, and one of 267 00:10:45,404 - > 00:10:47,634 which is what's this loan carrying value? 268 00:10:47,634 - > 00:10:50,125 So how is it valued for an investment perspective? 269 00:10:50,125 - > 00:10:50,524 So is it 270 00:10:50,544 - > 00:10:50,855 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: Yep. 271 00:10:52,245 - > 00:10:53,825 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2026: So is, e-essentially, are we gonna 272 00:10:53,825 - > 00:10:54,794 get our money back? 273 00:10:54,855 - > 00:10:55,235 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: yeah. 274 00:10:55,274 - > 00:10:57,065 That's one way to think about it. 275 00:10:57,065 - > 00:10:58,355 Is it stumbling along? 276 00:10:58,384 - > 00:10:58,965 Yeah. 277 00:10:58,990 - > 00:10:59,129 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_13: in a 278 00:10:59,355 - > 00:10:59,784 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 279 00:11:00,174 - > 00:11:00,365 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2: Yeah. 280 00:11:00,365 - > 00:11:00,575 Is 281 00:11:00,705 - > 00:11:00,875 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: Yes. 282 00:11:01,504 - > 00:11:03,855 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2: A-and then the second piece is 283 00:11:04,710 - > 00:11:05,110 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_13: Oh 284 00:11:05,625 - > 00:11:07,044 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 285 00:11:07,600 - > 00:11:11,600 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_13: my 286 00:11:11,875 - > 00:11:13,215 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2026: in the sense that in order to get 287 00:11:13,215 - > 00:11:14,065 the money out, you've got to 288 00:11:14,304 - > 00:11:14,534 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 289 00:11:14,615 - > 00:11:15,825 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-202: the company or you've got to sell 290 00:11:15,825 - > 00:11:17,174 your shares on a secondary. 291 00:11:18,465 - > 00:11:22,315 It's the same thing with private debt, where you essentially - or 292 00:11:22,315 - > 00:11:26,054 private credit, where you, i-in order for you to be able to get 293 00:11:26,054 - > 00:11:26,664 your money out. 294 00:11:26,664 - > 00:11:30,815 So when somebody goes,"I want out of this fund," they - you've 295 00:11:30,815 - > 00:11:34,264 got to be able to get that loan paid back by somebody, or you 296 00:11:34,264 - > 00:11:36,115 got to sell the loan to somebody. 297 00:11:36,465 - > 00:11:36,674 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: Yep. 298 00:11:37,304 - > 00:11:38,455 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2: Well, that's a different - 299 00:11:38,674 - > 00:11:40,134 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_1: if you're selling a loan, it's not 300 00:11:40,134 - > 00:11:42,865 being sold at par either on something like that. 301 00:11:43,370 - > 00:11:44,220 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-20: It - yeah, so 302 00:11:44,350 - > 00:11:44,429 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: Now 303 00:11:44,679 - > 00:11:46,549 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-202: par value is like the actual face 304 00:11:46,549 - > 00:11:47,450 value of a loan. 305 00:11:47,789 - > 00:11:48,210 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: hell? 306 00:11:48,870 - > 00:11:49,169 All right. 307 00:11:49,470 - > 00:11:50,799 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2: Yeah, this is - and, and what's funny 308 00:11:50,799 - > 00:11:51,409 is like Rory 309 00:11:51,450 - > 00:11:51,830 emily-sander_1_05-15-202: drunk. 310 00:11:51,889 - > 00:11:55,179 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-20: Rory and I, we're both on the private 311 00:11:55,360 - > 00:11:55,710 l- uh, 312 00:11:55,860 - > 00:11:55,919 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: know, 313 00:11:56,445 - > 00:11:56,825 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_1: We did, 314 00:11:57,009 - > 00:11:57,580 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15: credit, we've 315 00:11:57,605 - > 00:11:57,975 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: yeah. 316 00:11:58,009 - > 00:11:59,220 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15: private credit, and 317 00:11:59,659 - > 00:12:00,870 emily-sander_1_05-15-20: That's, that's fantastic. 318 00:12:00,870 - > 00:12:01,389 But so, okay, 319 00:12:01,590 - > 00:12:03,679 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2026: so we, we might get geeking out and 320 00:12:03,679 - > 00:12:05,200 talk like words that no one 321 00:12:05,284 - > 00:12:05,644 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: It's gonna 322 00:12:06,029 - > 00:12:06,460 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: got it. 323 00:12:06,674 - > 00:12:07,945 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_1: be a five-hour podcast. 324 00:12:07,945 - > 00:12:09,304 No, I was kidding. 325 00:12:09,529 - > 00:12:09,919 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: got it. 326 00:12:10,330 - > 00:12:11,049 What are you carrying? 327 00:12:11,049 - > 00:12:11,710 What's the carry? 328 00:12:11,809 - > 00:12:13,549 What is just, like, simple definition? 329 00:12:13,549 - > 00:12:14,179 Carry 330 00:12:14,254 - > 00:12:14,565 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: It - 331 00:12:14,710 - > 00:12:15,299 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: is... 332 00:12:15,504 - > 00:12:18,774 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_: the value of the asset. 333 00:12:21,044 - > 00:12:22,125 It's that, it's that simple. 334 00:12:22,409 - > 00:12:24,980 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: And then impaired, impaired is 335 00:12:24,995 - > 00:12:25,654 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: Yes. 336 00:12:25,809 - > 00:12:26,289 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-20: Yes. 337 00:12:26,970 - > 00:12:27,240 So 338 00:12:27,264 - > 00:12:28,384 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: It's a really good segue, by the way. 339 00:12:28,539 - > 00:12:30,240 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15: company a million dollars, 340 00:12:31,230 - > 00:12:31,570 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_: Yep. 341 00:12:32,519 - > 00:12:34,139 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-1: normally you would have that loan on your 342 00:12:34,139 - > 00:12:37,620 books, and you'd value that loan at a million dollars. 343 00:12:39,350 - > 00:12:43,350 But if you think that it's not gonna get paid back or it's 344 00:12:43,350 - > 00:12:46,649 delinquent or it's something, you, you impair that. 345 00:12:46,649 - > 00:12:49,519 You reduce the value to maybe $700,000. 346 00:12:49,615 - > 00:12:51,835 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_1: by doing that, Emily and listeners, 347 00:12:52,455 - > 00:12:56,475 that difference between the prior carrying value and the new 348 00:12:56,475 - > 00:12:59,475 value that's impaired is basically take - it's taken as a 349 00:12:59,475 - > 00:13:00,014 loss. 350 00:13:00,914 - > 00:13:02,934 So if you think about that, it goes from the balance sheet to 351 00:13:02,934 - > 00:13:03,735 the income statement. 352 00:13:04,054 - > 00:13:04,534 Now we're getting... 353 00:13:05,269 - > 00:13:05,669 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-202: And that 354 00:13:06,034 - > 00:13:06,615 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: Yes. 355 00:13:07,019 - > 00:13:11,019 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: Oh, 356 00:13:11,039 - > 00:13:14,740 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2026: as the, as the manager, it impacts 357 00:13:14,740 - > 00:13:14,830 my 358 00:13:15,054 - > 00:13:15,414 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: Yep. 359 00:13:15,690 - > 00:13:17,139 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2026: on the assets under management 360 00:13:17,139 - > 00:13:17,539 because now those 361 00:13:17,615 - > 00:13:17,894 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Boom. 362 00:13:17,894 - > 00:13:20,384 That was a perfect segue there, Emily. 363 00:13:20,504 - > 00:13:21,014 Exactly. 364 00:13:21,144 - > 00:13:21,644 That's it. 365 00:13:21,644 - > 00:13:25,065 And so, so therein lies the, the interesting part, and that's - 366 00:13:25,065 - > 00:13:26,884 we're just talking about private credit right there. 367 00:13:26,884 - > 00:13:28,715 It's, that's just, it's actually pretty simple. 368 00:13:28,715 - > 00:13:32,695 One thing that does need to be noted is that you're required to 369 00:13:32,735 - > 00:13:37,674 test these loans and these assets for impairment quarterly, 370 00:13:37,919 - > 00:13:38,100 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: Oh. 371 00:13:38,595 - > 00:13:38,845 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-20: right? 372 00:13:39,044 - > 00:13:43,424 So Ed and I, a-again, we worked at a company together where we 373 00:13:43,424 - > 00:13:46,804 built an entire system where we would literally test thousands 374 00:13:46,804 - > 00:13:49,985 of portfolios in an automated fashion every single... 375 00:13:50,014 - > 00:13:52,455 We did it monthly, actually, but we reported quarterly. 376 00:13:52,629 - > 00:13:52,889 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-20: Yep. 377 00:13:53,014 - > 00:13:54,504 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_: Uh, we did it monthly, and we would 378 00:13:54,504 - > 00:13:58,784 basically book a shitload of journal entries that were at the 379 00:13:58,784 - > 00:14:02,715 portfolio level, basically gains and loss On the portfolio and, 380 00:14:02,715 - > 00:14:06,414 and without getting too crazy into the GAAP accounting, 381 00:14:06,414 - > 00:14:09,554 because that's even - it's, it's, it is very complex, but 382 00:14:09,554 - > 00:14:10,975 you can reverse losses. 383 00:14:11,205 - > 00:14:13,184 You can, you can take gains as well. 384 00:14:13,184 - > 00:14:13,764 It just hap... 385 00:14:13,764 - > 00:14:14,004 Yeah. 386 00:14:14,605 - > 00:14:17,815 So it's t- it's point in time, but the point is you're supposed 387 00:14:17,815 - > 00:14:19,215 to do it every quarter. 388 00:14:19,254 - > 00:14:19,924 And guess what? 389 00:14:19,924 - > 00:14:23,014 It's e- you know, with, with loans, it's pretty easy to 390 00:14:23,014 - > 00:14:25,524 determine what the, what the impairment is. 391 00:14:25,524 - > 00:14:27,085 Are you getting paid back on time? 392 00:14:27,284 - > 00:14:27,934 Yes, no. 393 00:14:28,504 - > 00:14:30,884 What's the magnitude of, of, of the miss? 394 00:14:30,995 - > 00:14:32,365 Then you basically impair it. 395 00:14:32,784 - > 00:14:35,825 Well, think about pr- well, transitioning that to private 396 00:14:35,825 - > 00:14:38,465 equity, which is the crux of this, this article, is to say, 397 00:14:38,914 - > 00:14:41,514 "Well, hey, that's all happening for private credit, and people 398 00:14:41,514 - > 00:14:43,945 are freaking out." Well, what about private equity? 399 00:14:43,945 - > 00:14:49,875 It's even more wild because private equity, what can happen 400 00:14:50,904 - > 00:14:55,174 is when a fund acquires an interest in a business, it puts 401 00:14:55,174 - > 00:15:01,245 it on its balance sheet as, um, puts it on its balance sheet. 402 00:15:01,245 - > 00:15:04,804 But in the process of that, there's all sorts of things that 403 00:15:04,804 - > 00:15:07,085 go into how much is put on the balance sheet. 404 00:15:07,085 - > 00:15:10,384 In other words, you can book the purchase price. 405 00:15:10,384 - > 00:15:14,085 You could, you could book the value of the asset at different 406 00:15:14,184 - > 00:15:16,514 value than what you actually paid for it. 407 00:15:16,514 - > 00:15:19,065 You basically can make the case that I got such a screaming 408 00:15:19,065 - > 00:15:19,485 deal. 409 00:15:19,695 - > 00:15:22,004 In a lot of cases, that's true for a private equity fund. 410 00:15:22,004 - > 00:15:24,955 It's, they're buying something that's got way more intrinsic 411 00:15:24,955 - > 00:15:29,085 value than what they paid for it, because maybe they bought it 412 00:15:29,085 - > 00:15:29,884 in distress. 413 00:15:29,884 - > 00:15:32,065 Maybe it's a perfectly good company that just ran out of 414 00:15:32,065 - > 00:15:35,335 cash and had no prospects for getting more cash. 415 00:15:35,335 - > 00:15:36,924 They're like,"Wait, this is a good business. 416 00:15:37,125 - > 00:15:37,634 We'll pick it up. 417 00:15:37,634 - > 00:15:41,245 We got the cash." But anyway, so the point is, you can do all of 418 00:15:41,245 - > 00:15:45,264 these, these, um, calculations about market value and things 419 00:15:45,264 - > 00:15:45,725 like that. 420 00:15:45,725 - > 00:15:48,504 It's kind of subjective, and you can put on your balance sheet a 421 00:15:48,504 - > 00:15:49,054 certain value. 422 00:15:49,485 - > 00:15:50,095 But guess what? 423 00:15:50,095 - > 00:15:53,534 You still have to do, uh, they call it mark-to-market, uh, 424 00:15:53,534 - > 00:15:56,365 impairment testing, if you will, and you do that quarterly as 425 00:15:56,365 - > 00:15:56,544 well. 426 00:15:56,544 - > 00:15:59,125 I think y- you can go for, like, a period of time before you 427 00:15:59,125 - > 00:16:00,294 actually do that, I want to say. 428 00:16:00,934 - > 00:16:03,164 But over, at a certain point in time, you're doing it regularly. 429 00:16:03,784 - > 00:16:08,044 So think about the fact that there's all sorts of subjective, 430 00:16:08,794 - > 00:16:11,664 uh, ways to look at a market of va- market value of a company, 431 00:16:11,855 - > 00:16:15,654 and so you can make a case for any number of things at even an 432 00:16:15,654 - > 00:16:16,475 inflated value. 433 00:16:16,475 - > 00:16:20,115 So you might be able to kind of surmise that there might be some 434 00:16:20,115 - > 00:16:25,024 moral hazard in that, where, you know, somebody that runs a fund 435 00:16:25,414 - > 00:16:29,304 might be incentivized to keep a value inflated for just a little 436 00:16:29,304 - > 00:16:33,294 while, uh, while we work this other portfolio company out so 437 00:16:33,294 - > 00:16:36,794 that they don't, as Ed said, lose that denominator from which 438 00:16:36,794 - > 00:16:40,164 their 2% asset management fees calculate off of and their 439 00:16:40,164 - > 00:16:44,625 profits interest that is, you know, uh, partially due to the 440 00:16:44,654 - > 00:16:47,465 actual book profitability of that fund. 441 00:16:47,684 - > 00:16:52,784 So it's way more complex, I, I would say, or I guess more 442 00:16:52,784 - > 00:16:58,059 subjective than Private credit, but s- so, you know, you c- 443 00:16:58,299 - > 00:17:00,629 people aren't running to the - people aren't rushing to mark 444 00:17:00,629 - > 00:17:01,990 things down, let me just tell you that. 445 00:17:01,990 - > 00:17:04,390 Like, unless they've already sold the asset and they're 446 00:17:04,390 - > 00:17:05,450 getting some tax benefit from it. 447 00:17:05,549 - > 00:17:06,099 I don't know, but... 448 00:17:07,089 - > 00:17:10,710 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_13: so it's kind of like they are 449 00:17:11,559 - > 00:17:15,019 figure skating of the Olympics, where like figure skaters are 450 00:17:15,019 - > 00:17:18,269 athletic, but they have these weird scores that are 451 00:17:18,420 - > 00:17:19,049 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_: I'm tracking. 452 00:17:19,359 - > 00:17:19,779 Yeah. 453 00:17:19,890 - > 00:17:23,369 emily-sander_1_05-1: performance and like verve and what - like 454 00:17:23,369 - > 00:17:23,630 what? 455 00:17:23,789 - > 00:17:25,589 Like, okay, the guy did a triple axel 456 00:17:25,849 - > 00:17:26,140 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Dude, 457 00:17:26,339 - > 00:17:27,400 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: the costume, like I 458 00:17:27,470 - > 00:17:27,829 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: yeah. 459 00:17:28,059 - > 00:17:28,309 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_13: So 460 00:17:29,269 - > 00:17:30,119 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-: Imagine, um, 461 00:17:30,339 - > 00:17:30,549 emily-sander_1_05-15-202: things 462 00:17:30,660 - > 00:17:31,029 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: look at the, 463 00:17:31,150 - > 00:17:31,480 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: on? 464 00:17:31,480 - > 00:17:32,920 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-20: public equities markets, right? 465 00:17:32,920 - > 00:17:36,000 Where it's all transparent and you're actually - you look at 466 00:17:36,000 - > 00:17:40,500 some of the p- price to earnings ratios, which figures into the 467 00:17:40,750 - > 00:17:41,920 price of the stock, right? 468 00:17:42,549 - > 00:17:45,349 And this is, this is published information public, and, like, 469 00:17:45,380 - > 00:17:48,059 these valuation ratios are, are nuts. 470 00:17:48,690 - > 00:17:52,140 Think about certain sectors that are crazy hot, AI, that kind of 471 00:17:52,140 - > 00:17:52,500 stuff. 472 00:17:52,500 - > 00:17:52,960 Like, there's no... 473 00:17:53,660 - > 00:17:53,890 emily-sander_1_05-15-202: Aren't they 474 00:17:53,960 - > 00:17:54,660 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-20: That's what I'm saying. 475 00:17:54,809 - > 00:17:56,450 Like, it's, it's all relative. 476 00:17:56,490 - > 00:17:57,390 It can be relative. 477 00:17:57,390 - > 00:17:59,849 One can make a case of relativity on just about 478 00:17:59,849 - > 00:18:00,359 anything. 479 00:18:00,970 - > 00:18:03,900 We can say that this is a cyclical issue, that there's 480 00:18:03,900 - > 00:18:07,950 inherent, um, value in this business that's unrealized 481 00:18:07,950 - > 00:18:08,470 today. 482 00:18:08,940 - > 00:18:11,789 Uh, you can talk about it from a competitive standpoint, which is 483 00:18:11,789 - > 00:18:14,640 kind of like a competitive, like, mark on private companies, 484 00:18:14,980 - > 00:18:16,619 what transacted previously. 485 00:18:16,619 - > 00:18:18,849 You can put yourselves - I've, I've been in companies that have 486 00:18:18,849 - > 00:18:19,170 done this. 487 00:18:19,170 - > 00:18:21,410 I've been, I've done these calculations where it's like, 488 00:18:22,059 - > 00:18:23,809 where's your company amongst its peers? 489 00:18:23,809 - > 00:18:26,210 Well, these are all private companies, so how do you put a 490 00:18:26,210 - > 00:18:28,839 value on your business and, you know, what have you? 491 00:18:28,869 - > 00:18:36,259 And so the point is there's, there's a lot of ways to, um, 492 00:18:37,750 - > 00:18:41,539 uh, how do I delicately put it without saying game things? 493 00:18:41,539 - > 00:18:46,829 But like, you, you can, you can engineer yourself out of taking 494 00:18:46,829 - > 00:18:48,779 big losses or you can engineer gains. 495 00:18:49,400 - > 00:18:53,700 But at some point, as we do all know, uh, you do - private 496 00:18:53,700 - > 00:18:54,819 equity doesn't make for life. 497 00:18:54,819 - > 00:18:57,630 So like when you do sell the asset, let's say you kept it at 498 00:18:57,630 - > 00:19:01,309 a way inflated value and you sell it way down here, you do 499 00:19:01,309 - > 00:19:03,349 have to pay the piper at some point. 500 00:19:03,849 - > 00:19:08,880 But along the way, who's really incentivized to, you know, um, 501 00:19:09,059 - > 00:19:15,079 keep, keep things, um, marked to market in all cases objectively 502 00:19:15,630 - > 00:19:18,259 if you're talking about fee income being driven from that? 503 00:19:18,259 - > 00:19:18,410 That's 504 00:19:19,634 - > 00:19:19,835 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2: Yeah. 505 00:19:19,839 - > 00:19:19,910 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_1: a, 506 00:19:20,085 - > 00:19:21,375 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2026: I, what I would, what I would say 507 00:19:21,375 - > 00:19:26,125 is I have seen on - in my private equity experience, when 508 00:19:26,125 - > 00:19:29,724 you have a home run hit, at that point, they might 509 00:19:29,970 - > 00:19:30,720 rory-liebhart_1_05-1: reasonable question. 510 00:19:30,750 - > 00:19:31,069 Yeah. 511 00:19:31,164 - > 00:19:31,244 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2026: to 512 00:19:31,349 - > 00:19:31,410 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 513 00:19:31,694 - > 00:19:32,055 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-20: down to 514 00:19:32,069 - > 00:19:32,130 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 515 00:19:32,355 - > 00:19:32,394 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2026: of 516 00:19:32,480 - > 00:19:32,740 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 517 00:19:32,750 - > 00:19:33,539 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: Oh. 518 00:19:33,694 - > 00:19:34,365 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-: kinda..." So 519 00:19:34,410 - > 00:19:34,599 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-20: That's a 520 00:19:34,734 - > 00:19:35,154 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-1: maintain 521 00:19:35,289 - > 00:19:35,720 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: call. 522 00:19:35,950 - > 00:19:36,289 Yeah. 523 00:19:36,775 - > 00:19:37,335 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-202: but we're 524 00:19:37,529 - > 00:19:37,849 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 525 00:19:37,904 - > 00:19:40,234 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-1: bringing that other valuation down as we 526 00:19:40,234 - > 00:19:43,644 realize a big value on something else so that it kinda 527 00:19:43,880 - > 00:19:44,259 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 528 00:19:44,325 - > 00:19:45,664 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2026: it a little bit and keeps the 529 00:19:45,664 - > 00:19:46,184 reported 530 00:19:46,220 - > 00:19:46,460 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_: like at 531 00:19:46,464 - > 00:19:47,025 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-: return higher 532 00:19:47,289 - > 00:19:48,730 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_: when you kind of dump some 533 00:19:48,769 - > 00:19:49,619 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: Loss harvesting. 534 00:19:49,619 - > 00:19:50,509 Yeah, exactly right. 535 00:19:50,509 - > 00:19:51,329 That's a great call. 536 00:19:51,384 - > 00:19:51,704 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2: Yeah. 537 00:19:52,890 - > 00:19:53,099 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 538 00:19:53,619 - > 00:19:53,720 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: Okay. 539 00:19:53,880 - > 00:19:57,799 So is this article saying there should be more of the impairment 540 00:19:57,799 - > 00:19:58,329 checks 541 00:19:58,579 - > 00:20:01,480 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: more of an expository article in, in 542 00:20:01,480 - > 00:20:04,130 such form that like, it's just saying,"Hey, for all of you 543 00:20:04,130 - > 00:20:07,640 don't, that don't know about this, this, this happens." 544 00:20:07,900 - > 00:20:10,230 This - You're, you're worried about private credit and people 545 00:20:10,230 - > 00:20:10,990 fleeing from the, 546 00:20:11,019 - > 00:20:11,099 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: okay. 547 00:20:11,339 - > 00:20:12,759 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: from the, the funds. 548 00:20:12,759 - > 00:20:18,119 Well, private equity is bigger and is even more, uh, squishy. 549 00:20:18,144 - > 00:20:19,005 big-ed - big-ed-_1_0: Subjective. 550 00:20:19,319 - > 00:20:19,559 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 551 00:20:19,559 - > 00:20:22,509 So if you're into certainty and things like that, then, you 552 00:20:22,509 - > 00:20:24,809 know, um, that's so- that's something to think about. 553 00:20:24,809 - > 00:20:27,650 It's more just an intellectual article. 554 00:20:27,700 - > 00:20:28,890 Like I said, clickbaity. 555 00:20:28,920 - > 00:20:31,759 I found it interesting, but, you know, I don't... 556 00:20:32,059 - > 00:20:34,869 This is, this is how it's always been, probably how it always 557 00:20:34,869 - > 00:20:35,619 will be, you know? 558 00:20:36,109 - > 00:20:39,390 So because if you - I, I mean, how do you make the case the 559 00:20:39,390 - > 00:20:43,220 other way that like, there's a objective way to mark a private 560 00:20:43,220 - > 00:20:47,400 company to market based on m-myriad factors and that impact 561 00:20:47,400 - > 00:20:49,069 valuation in any day. 562 00:20:49,069 - > 00:20:51,700 These are not publicly traded, fully liquid securities, so how 563 00:20:51,700 - > 00:20:54,240 much of your value is liquidity based? 564 00:20:54,240 - > 00:20:57,140 How much of it is based on the fundamentals of the business? 565 00:20:57,140 - > 00:20:57,809 Things like that. 566 00:20:57,839 - > 00:21:01,640 How do you value a company that's just been part of a bunch 567 00:21:01,640 - > 00:21:04,920 of acquisitions that, like synergies? 568 00:21:04,960 - > 00:21:09,730 I think that's actually like one of the main, main, um, main, uh, 569 00:21:09,769 - > 00:21:14,640 like, uh, supports for certain valuation is like you create 570 00:21:14,640 - > 00:21:15,569 synergy, right? 571 00:21:15,569 - > 00:21:17,589 Like you bolt something onto another company. 572 00:21:17,970 - > 00:21:20,190 Well, those synergies will be realized over the next five 573 00:21:20,190 - > 00:21:21,519 years, and we're gonna factor that in here. 574 00:21:21,670 - > 00:21:23,240 You know, that kind of stuff, so. 575 00:21:24,400 - > 00:21:25,490 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: You know, it'll be interesting to 576 00:21:25,490 - > 00:21:29,599 see how these financial folks are evaluated. 577 00:21:29,599 - > 00:21:33,170 Like, are you getting, getting good marks for like,"I can 578 00:21:33,170 - > 00:21:36,009 creatively craft this subjective thing," and then it's 579 00:21:36,039 - > 00:21:37,190 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-20: That's an interesting question. 580 00:21:37,220 - > 00:21:37,690 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: where it's good? 581 00:21:37,839 - > 00:21:40,309 Or like,"No, no, no, like you had the biggest gap in the world 582 00:21:40,339 - > 00:21:41,109 where you're doing and you're, you're 583 00:21:41,369 - > 00:21:43,029 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_1: my guess would be CFOs can keep 584 00:21:43,029 - > 00:21:44,619 their jobs if they do it well enough. 585 00:21:44,680 - > 00:21:48,839 Um, uh, and don't, I don't wanna miscon- I don't wanna 586 00:21:48,839 - > 00:21:51,130 misconstrue the message here. 587 00:21:51,170 - > 00:21:53,049 All of this stuff is totally audited. 588 00:21:53,079 - > 00:21:57,009 So like, again, y-you're, you - these are things that are 589 00:21:57,009 - > 00:21:57,970 modeled out. 590 00:21:57,970 - > 00:22:01,079 It's just that the variables are what's kind of somewhat 591 00:22:01,079 - > 00:22:01,849 subjective. 592 00:22:01,970 - > 00:22:04,359 Like you're not just making up, you're just not making up 593 00:22:04,359 - > 00:22:05,369 numbers generally. 594 00:22:05,369 - > 00:22:08,190 You're, you are creating a case for it because you will be 595 00:22:08,190 - > 00:22:11,579 audited, but the auditors will look at this stuff and say, 596 00:22:11,579 - > 00:22:13,339 "Okay, I can see the logic in it. 597 00:22:13,339 - > 00:22:15,980 Can I actually like prove it out?" Not necessarily, but 598 00:22:16,559 - > 00:22:19,049 that's not necessarily what the barometer is. 599 00:22:19,049 - > 00:22:22,759 It's like, is there supportive, uh, thinking behind this? 600 00:22:22,759 - > 00:22:25,150 And yeah, I mean, generally it is, yeah. 601 00:22:28,680 - > 00:22:29,140 emily-sander_1_05-15-20: Does... 602 00:22:30,039 - > 00:22:32,089 Is this one of those things where it's like,"Everyone's 603 00:22:32,089 - > 00:22:32,470 doing 604 00:22:32,799 - > 00:22:33,259 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-20: Kinda. 605 00:22:33,359 - > 00:22:33,440 I 606 00:22:33,470 - > 00:22:33,779 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: doing 607 00:22:34,150 - > 00:22:34,400 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: yeah. 608 00:22:34,710 - > 00:22:35,039 Yeah. 609 00:22:35,079 - > 00:22:35,150 I 610 00:22:35,440 - > 00:22:35,809 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: Okay. 611 00:22:36,200 - > 00:22:38,329 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_13: I would say that like, you know, 612 00:22:38,490 - > 00:22:45,740 um, I don't know that there's like a pervasive like direct, 613 00:22:45,740 - > 00:22:49,154 "Hey, what's the performance of this fund?" To our investors, 614 00:22:49,154 - > 00:22:52,545 are we hitting our 10% preferred return to our investors? 615 00:22:52,994 - > 00:22:56,694 If so, then, you know, we can be a little more conservative on 616 00:22:56,694 - > 00:22:57,115 the mark. 617 00:22:57,154 - > 00:22:58,644 If not, then we could be more aggressive. 618 00:22:58,674 - > 00:22:59,805 I don't think that's happening. 619 00:22:59,865 - > 00:23:02,535 I just think that there's just, you know, people put thought 620 00:23:02,535 - > 00:23:05,454 into how to, how to put it on the balance sheet originally 621 00:23:05,454 - > 00:23:09,295 based on the, uh, acquisition, and then they basically test it 622 00:23:09,295 - > 00:23:09,674 from there. 623 00:23:09,674 - > 00:23:12,154 And unless there's some major sea change reason to 624 00:23:12,664 - > 00:23:16,355 market-to-market, um, or like Ed said, you know, kind of since 625 00:23:16,355 - > 00:23:19,224 situations come up where there's like a home run where it's like, 626 00:23:19,224 - > 00:23:24,144 okay, you know, uh, we probably ought to, you know, sort of slow 627 00:23:24,144 - > 00:23:24,575 things down. 628 00:23:24,575 - > 00:23:27,994 Like, you know, it's just why are you gonna spend the time 629 00:23:27,994 - > 00:23:30,684 every quarter to do a comprehensive market valuation 630 00:23:30,684 - > 00:23:35,184 to justify whether your, you know,$100 million investment is 631 00:23:35,285 - > 00:23:37,765 appreciated or depreciated by 3% either way, you know? 632 00:23:38,734 - > 00:23:39,384 It's just not gonna happen. 633 00:23:42,193 - > 00:23:43,683 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: Yeah, I'm kind of wondering, like, I 634 00:23:43,683 - > 00:23:47,243 remember it's different than accounting and balancing the 635 00:23:47,243 - > 00:23:49,624 books where you wanna be like penny perfect if you 636 00:23:49,875 - > 00:23:51,934 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_1: it is, uh, this is an accounting, 637 00:23:52,025 - > 00:23:54,345 this is an accounting exercise 100%. 638 00:23:55,025 - > 00:24:00,575 Um, but, but finance fuels accounting in this case, or I 639 00:24:00,575 - > 00:24:03,194 should say, you know, financial planning and analysis fuels 640 00:24:03,194 - > 00:24:03,724 accounting. 641 00:24:04,444 - > 00:24:07,375 Um, the accountant is just booking the journal entry on it. 642 00:24:07,375 - > 00:24:09,234 The balance sheet still does balance, I promise you. 643 00:24:09,684 - > 00:24:14,815 Um, but the, the, you know, the, the, the analytical teams are 644 00:24:14,815 - > 00:24:15,835 the ones doing the work. 645 00:24:16,125 - > 00:24:18,404 Um, and like I said, I think quarter to quarter, not a lot 646 00:24:18,404 - > 00:24:22,805 changes unless you do have like, you know, maybe the, the, the 647 00:24:23,035 - > 00:24:25,835 operating company itself underlying that investment 648 00:24:26,555 - > 00:24:29,724 either buys and sells another, um, com- part of, you know, 649 00:24:29,805 - > 00:24:33,484 either divests parts of itself or acquires a, you know, 650 00:24:33,555 - > 00:24:36,045 ancillary business or something like that, which you would then 651 00:24:36,365 - > 00:24:37,565 record, so. 652 00:24:38,494 - > 00:24:42,484 Um, but I think, um, you know, this, like I said, I think this 653 00:24:42,484 - > 00:24:44,785 article is interesting just 'cause I think it might be an 654 00:24:44,785 - > 00:24:47,204 eye-opener for people that are intellectually curious about it. 655 00:24:47,234 - > 00:24:50,355 But I think, you know, anyone that invests in private equity 656 00:24:50,615 - > 00:24:53,384 understands private equity for what it is. 657 00:24:53,414 - > 00:24:57,664 It is a risk-based investment, more so than a credit investment 658 00:24:57,664 - > 00:24:58,394 for the most part. 659 00:24:58,914 - > 00:25:01,325 And so, you know, I don't think you're gonna see a lot of people 660 00:25:01,894 - > 00:25:06,934 fleeing for the, um, exits because of like some revelatory 661 00:25:06,934 - > 00:25:10,174 article in Wall Street Journal about how the accounting works. 662 00:25:10,174 - > 00:25:13,265 So at the end of the day, it's still really about cash. 663 00:25:13,295 - > 00:25:15,224 So, um, you know. 664 00:25:15,555 - > 00:25:19,295 But, but you know, maybe private equity fund managers kind of 665 00:25:19,454 - > 00:25:22,454 keep tabs on things so that the, you know, incentive fees and, 666 00:25:23,174 - > 00:25:26,265 and asset management fees are not out of whack quarter to 667 00:25:26,265 - > 00:25:26,575 quarter. 668 00:25:28,805 - > 00:25:31,394 emily-sander_1_: Reputationally, like just, just like on the 669 00:25:31,394 - > 00:25:34,105 street, it's like,"Oh, like private credit is way more 670 00:25:34,105 - > 00:25:37,775 risky," or like,"Oh, private equity is like you're kind of 671 00:25:37,775 - > 00:25:38,414 rolling the dice 672 00:25:38,684 - > 00:25:40,634 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_: My, my impression talking to folks 673 00:25:40,634 - > 00:25:43,704 is people still don't really get private credit. 674 00:25:43,845 - > 00:25:46,865 They don't - It's just, i- which is a funny thing because it's 675 00:25:46,865 - > 00:25:47,825 been so much more 676 00:25:48,744 - > 00:25:49,085 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_: They were like 677 00:25:49,180 - > 00:25:49,460 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 678 00:25:49,460 - > 00:25:52,480 No, but now you're - you, you took, you took, uh, you know, 22 679 00:25:52,480 - > 00:25:54,789 minutes to, like, figure it out, and you're like,"Oh, yeah, I get 680 00:25:54,789 - > 00:25:56,480 it now." Like, um, 681 00:25:56,755 - > 00:25:56,845 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: Yeah. 682 00:25:57,730 - > 00:25:59,569 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_13: I think pe- but private credit, as 683 00:25:59,569 - > 00:26:02,250 Ed said, we've been doing deals in private credit for 20-plus 684 00:26:02,250 - > 00:26:04,549 years, and it's been a long far beyond be-before that. 685 00:26:04,579 - > 00:26:08,630 But, but people generally just look at these, this whole 686 00:26:08,630 - > 00:26:12,589 private equity or credit as just like this really scary 687 00:26:12,730 - > 00:26:17,660 alternative asset class that's like, you know, um, only the 688 00:26:17,660 - > 00:26:19,690 institutional investors plan. 689 00:26:19,690 - > 00:26:23,329 Which is funny because now this has never been more democratized 690 00:26:23,329 - > 00:26:24,859 for the masses than it is now. 691 00:26:24,859 - > 00:26:28,670 You, you know, as an individual, I can go participate in any 692 00:26:28,849 - > 00:26:29,670 private equity fund. 693 00:26:29,670 - > 00:26:31,859 Maybe not every fund, but, like, there's a lot of funds that are 694 00:26:31,859 - > 00:26:33,160 available to reta-retail. 695 00:26:33,160 - > 00:26:36,460 We're, we're retail investors, uh, let's, let's say. 696 00:26:36,660 - > 00:26:39,529 Um, it's available to everybody, and there's a lot of publicly 697 00:26:39,529 - > 00:26:43,480 traded private equity group companies that are large that 698 00:26:43,480 - > 00:26:47,259 you can, by buying the stock on the, you know, uh, Nasdaq or 699 00:26:47,259 - > 00:26:50,779 wherever it's traded, you're, you're, you have the same risk 700 00:26:50,779 - > 00:26:51,700 profile at that point. 701 00:26:51,809 - > 00:26:55,619 Maybe more liquidity with your own shares, but the underlying 702 00:26:55,619 - > 00:26:56,480 business is the same. 703 00:26:58,265 - > 00:26:59,075 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: its own category or is that within 704 00:26:59,075 - > 00:27:03,194 one of... 705 00:27:03,579 - > 00:27:03,930 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2: it's... 706 00:27:03,930 - > 00:27:05,349 I don't know, Ed, what do you think on that? 707 00:27:05,559 - > 00:27:07,589 I, I'd be interested in your perspective there. 708 00:27:07,910 - > 00:27:08,019 Yeah. 709 00:27:08,644 - > 00:27:09,424 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2: Yeah, it's in both. 710 00:27:09,424 - > 00:27:13,444 So real estate, it - again, if it's private credit, there's 711 00:27:13,444 - > 00:27:16,265 generally gonna be a structuring difference between what you 712 00:27:16,265 - > 00:27:17,944 would get from a traditional commercial 713 00:27:18,160 - > 00:27:18,450 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 714 00:27:18,994 - > 00:27:19,805 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-202: you know, if you're doing a real 715 00:27:19,805 - > 00:27:20,625 estate development. 716 00:27:21,204 - > 00:27:24,035 Um, and that's generally gonna have either some level of 717 00:27:24,035 - > 00:27:30,515 escalator or graduated repayment or equity participation, along 718 00:27:30,515 - > 00:27:30,875 with it. 719 00:27:31,545 - > 00:27:32,555 emily-sander_1_05-15-20: Explain those three 720 00:27:32,644 - > 00:27:36,244 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2026: So an escalator is gonna be you 721 00:27:36,434 - > 00:27:39,174 borrow money for the, uh, development, and for the first 722 00:27:39,174 - > 00:27:39,964 two years, 723 00:27:40,130 - > 00:27:40,480 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 724 00:27:40,734 - > 00:27:42,055 big-ed - big-ed-_1_0: development or you're building an apartment 725 00:27:42,055 - > 00:27:44,835 complex, for the first two years it's interest only at a twelve 726 00:27:44,835 - > 00:27:45,565 percent rate. 727 00:27:46,005 - > 00:27:48,575 And then once the apartment building goes live, you start 728 00:27:48,575 - > 00:27:51,154 paying principal, and then your interest rate drops to eight 729 00:27:51,154 - > 00:27:52,464 percent or seven percent. 730 00:27:52,984 - > 00:27:56,154 And then at ten years, and it might be on a thirty-year 731 00:27:56,154 - > 00:27:58,984 amortization, and at ten years you have to refinance the whole 732 00:27:58,984 - > 00:27:59,164 thing. 733 00:27:59,785 - > 00:28:02,785 So it may be that's gonna have an escalator or a graduated 734 00:28:02,785 - > 00:28:03,684 payment structure. 735 00:28:04,075 - > 00:28:07,884 Or it may be that you go,"Okay, we've got..." You know, the, the 736 00:28:07,884 - > 00:28:10,654 real estate developer borrows ten million dollars to build 737 00:28:10,654 - > 00:28:13,204 this, to build this building, and they put up certain amount 738 00:28:13,204 - > 00:28:13,734 of money. 739 00:28:14,065 - > 00:28:18,154 And if the building sells within the first, you know, five years 740 00:28:18,154 - > 00:28:22,904 or ten years, that the - not only does the, uh, loan get paid 741 00:28:22,904 - > 00:28:23,964 back, but there's 742 00:28:24,160 - > 00:28:24,440 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 743 00:28:24,815 - > 00:28:25,525 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15: penalty or 744 00:28:25,579 - > 00:28:25,849 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 745 00:28:26,585 - > 00:28:27,714 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2: which is effectively an 746 00:28:27,740 - > 00:28:28,049 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: Yep. 747 00:28:28,049 - > 00:28:28,140 Yep. 748 00:28:28,765 - > 00:28:31,375 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-: amount that says, okay - or, or it's a 749 00:28:31,674 - > 00:28:34,244 profit participation amount that says,"Okay, if you really make a 750 00:28:34,244 - > 00:28:37,515 bunch of money and sell this thing, get-" You know, an 751 00:28:37,515 - > 00:28:38,924 additional, an additional 752 00:28:39,069 - > 00:28:39,420 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 753 00:28:39,474 - > 00:28:42,025 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2026: on it because you didn't hold - you 754 00:28:42,025 - > 00:28:44,654 didn't keep our loan out long enough, which also slows down 755 00:28:44,654 - > 00:28:44,775 the 756 00:28:45,160 - > 00:28:45,480 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 757 00:28:46,750 - > 00:28:47,660 That's very common 758 00:28:47,805 - > 00:28:49,144 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-20: it's gonna have some of those types 759 00:28:49,144 - > 00:28:52,065 of structures in there on real estate that you're not 760 00:28:52,065 - > 00:28:55,505 necessarily gonna see in a deal where they're... 761 00:28:55,694 - > 00:28:58,134 You know, like the one that Rory and I were involved in, where it 762 00:28:58,134 - > 00:29:02,134 was really a different type of collateralized asset, which was 763 00:29:02,134 - > 00:29:05,525 loan pools, or into an operating company. 764 00:29:05,525 - > 00:29:08,664 But they all - anything in private credit is going to have 765 00:29:08,664 - > 00:29:14,335 some variation on a traditional loan theme you know, makes it 766 00:29:14,815 - > 00:29:18,634 not what a typical bank on Main Street is gonna, is gonna offer 767 00:29:18,634 - > 00:29:21,275 to anybody, or even a JPMorgan Chase. 768 00:29:21,275 - > 00:29:24,295 Although, like a JPMorgan Chase does have a, a 769 00:29:24,400 - > 00:29:24,460 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 770 00:29:24,555 - > 00:29:26,075 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2026: of specialty lending group that 771 00:29:26,075 - > 00:29:28,924 will do those types of, those types of loans, which is how we 772 00:29:28,924 - > 00:29:30,845 ended up with RBS, Greenwich Capital. 773 00:29:30,994 - > 00:29:33,644 Greenwich Capital is Royal Bank of Scotland's version of that. 774 00:29:34,599 - > 00:29:36,720 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: But in theory, you could say,"I know 775 00:29:37,140 - > 00:29:39,960 where my money is going to be for the next 30 years and how 776 00:29:39,960 - > 00:29:43,789 the repayment schedule is gonna look like." And there's gonna 777 00:29:44,130 - > 00:29:49,920 ha- be some where they don't go to plan, but in some - in a lot 778 00:29:49,920 - > 00:29:52,130 of ways, it's more predictable than like private equity, and we 779 00:29:52,130 - > 00:29:54,730 think this company is gonna grow to be the next Facebook and da, 780 00:29:54,730 - > 00:29:54,940 da, da, 781 00:29:54,974 - > 00:29:56,444 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2: Yeah, but it's not a collateralized 782 00:29:56,444 - > 00:29:57,375 mortgage pool. 783 00:29:57,375 - > 00:29:57,914 It's not... 784 00:29:57,994 - > 00:30:01,515 I mean, it is a different risk profile with a different return 785 00:30:01,515 - > 00:30:04,454 profile because of the risk premium that's got to be built 786 00:30:04,454 - > 00:30:07,214 into that for illiquidity and for v-volatility. 787 00:30:07,845 - > 00:30:11,194 But it, it's sits somewhere between... 788 00:30:12,025 - > 00:30:14,605 And Rory described it earlier extremely well. 789 00:30:14,605 - > 00:30:17,724 Like, the best private equity is less risky than the worst 790 00:30:18,224 - > 00:30:19,934 private credit, and vice versa. 791 00:30:20,615 - > 00:30:20,855 You know? 792 00:30:20,855 - > 00:30:24,244 So it really should, all things being equal, if you look 793 00:30:24,269 - > 00:30:24,579 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: Yep. 794 00:30:24,765 - > 00:30:26,954 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-: stack, the private credit's gonna be 795 00:30:26,954 - > 00:30:29,934 ahead of the private equity on a capital stack in any given 796 00:30:29,934 - > 00:30:30,484 company. 797 00:30:31,095 - > 00:30:34,664 But it's really how is that pool assembled, because it's normally 798 00:30:34,664 - > 00:30:37,305 a fund of, and so there's multiple investments. 799 00:30:37,305 - > 00:30:38,535 How's that pool assembled? 800 00:30:38,934 - > 00:30:39,734 And that 801 00:30:39,849 - > 00:30:43,849 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 802 00:30:43,924 - > 00:30:45,964 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-: credit a little bit less risky than 803 00:30:45,964 - > 00:30:47,454 private equity, but not always. 804 00:30:47,805 - > 00:30:50,644 And within that pool, you're gonna have, you know, riskier 805 00:30:50,644 - > 00:30:53,474 and less risky loans and riskier and less risky equity 806 00:30:53,474 - > 00:30:54,105 investments. 807 00:30:54,914 - > 00:30:55,934 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: And you were mentioning, like, the, 808 00:30:56,015 - > 00:30:58,585 the grades earlier and there's different classes of things. 809 00:30:58,934 - > 00:31:02,444 Um, and then just to cover off on it, so what's the distinction 810 00:31:02,444 - > 00:31:03,335 for real estate? 811 00:31:03,704 - > 00:31:05,894 What would make it credit versus equity? 812 00:31:05,894 - > 00:31:06,865 You said they could be both. 813 00:31:07,744 - > 00:31:09,634 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-20: it's gonna have - normally have some 814 00:31:09,634 - > 00:31:13,234 component in it that is not a traditional credit component. 815 00:31:13,865 - > 00:31:16,265 So a traditional credit component for a traditional 816 00:31:16,265 - > 00:31:18,634 mortgage on real estate is you borrow. 817 00:31:19,105 - > 00:31:21,994 The following month, you start repaying on an, on a 818 00:31:21,994 - > 00:31:25,325 amortization schedule that has essentially, for 819 00:31:25,325 - > 00:31:28,474 simpli-simplified, again, commercial is sometimes a little 820 00:31:28,474 - > 00:31:32,855 bit different, but basically has a level repayment a term of, 821 00:31:33,150 - > 00:31:34,609 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2: Mm-hmm. 822 00:31:35,220 - > 00:31:35,480 Yeah. 823 00:31:36,160 - > 00:31:39,210 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2026_: A private credit instrument and 824 00:31:39,210 - > 00:31:42,210 real - that's secured by real estate may be in a second or 825 00:31:42,210 - > 00:31:44,869 third position, so it may not have the first mortgage. 826 00:31:44,869 - > 00:31:46,839 It may be in a second or third mortgage position. 827 00:31:47,289 - > 00:31:52,450 It may have something that varies that re - that amount 828 00:31:52,930 - > 00:31:57,759 based upon collected, based upon completion, based upon some 829 00:31:57,759 - > 00:31:58,940 other methodology. 830 00:31:59,410 - > 00:32:03,720 And it may also have a, if the, if the project is sold or 831 00:32:03,720 - > 00:32:07,359 refinanced within a certain amount of time, and the amount 832 00:32:07,359 - > 00:32:11,690 is in excess of X or Y, that we have a participation in that 833 00:32:11,690 - > 00:32:15,809 profit the sale of the, on the sale of the business or on the 834 00:32:15,809 - > 00:32:18,740 sale of the development as part of our 835 00:32:18,855 - > 00:32:19,144 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 836 00:32:19,339 - > 00:32:19,900 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-1: package. 837 00:32:20,174 - > 00:32:21,964 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_13: I mean, I think on a practical 838 00:32:21,964 - > 00:32:24,904 basis, and this is just Rory speaking from Rory's 839 00:32:25,674 - > 00:32:28,865 perspective, I do look at real estate as a separate asset class 840 00:32:28,865 - > 00:32:34,134 in itself in the sense that the characteristics of what makes a 841 00:32:34,134 - > 00:32:37,035 real estate play successful or unsuccessful are, is different 842 00:32:37,035 - > 00:32:41,164 than investing in a private credit fund or like a, a, a, a 843 00:32:41,454 - > 00:32:44,295 credit strategy or an equity strategy. 844 00:32:44,964 - > 00:32:46,994 We were dealing with businesses and operating companies. 845 00:32:47,164 - > 00:32:50,974 That being said, like Ed, where I attach it all is to say, if 846 00:32:50,974 - > 00:32:55,085 I'm investing in real estate, I do wanna understand how 847 00:32:55,085 - > 00:32:59,805 leveraged that real estate fund is because that itself creates a 848 00:32:59,805 - > 00:33:02,474 different risk profile than something that's not leveraged. 849 00:33:02,525 - > 00:33:06,184 So more leverage, more risky, less leverage, less risky, 850 00:33:06,214 - > 00:33:07,595 basically, all things being equal. 851 00:33:07,994 - > 00:33:12,404 So I think the, the interesting thing about, um, real estate is 852 00:33:12,404 - > 00:33:19,315 that it is its own unique thing, but it, it's - the level of 853 00:33:19,414 - > 00:33:22,994 performance and profitability dic- is dictated by, you know, 854 00:33:22,994 - > 00:33:26,684 kind of the level of debt and equity supporting that strategy, 855 00:33:26,755 - > 00:33:27,144 I guess. 856 00:33:27,184 - > 00:33:31,484 I mean, I, I guess you could say the same thing about any, you 857 00:33:31,484 - > 00:33:34,654 know, any business, but like, I don't know, it, it is its own 858 00:33:34,654 - > 00:33:35,224 unique thing. 859 00:33:35,224 - > 00:33:37,894 And the, the other thing I would say about real estate, since 860 00:33:37,894 - > 00:33:40,875 we're turning this into a real estate pod, which is great, uh, 861 00:33:40,875 - > 00:33:44,204 is that, you know, it's also, there's some s- very interesting 862 00:33:44,204 - > 00:33:46,265 tax strategies associated with that. 863 00:33:46,265 - > 00:33:49,214 So you can continue to flip properties and flip properties 864 00:33:49,214 - > 00:33:51,994 and flip properties on a 1031 exchange, which gives you 865 00:33:51,994 - > 00:33:53,884 significant tax benefits as well. 866 00:33:54,555 - > 00:33:58,474 Um, so it's, it's why it's generally offered as its own 867 00:33:58,474 - > 00:34:02,694 asset class and why we think about, like when we, we most, 868 00:34:02,825 - > 00:34:06,305 most individuals think about, "Hey, you know, I have my real 869 00:34:06,305 - > 00:34:09,344 estate, I have my home, like that's my own asset class," 870 00:34:09,344 - > 00:34:12,875 versus,"I also inves- I invest in the stock market too." People 871 00:34:13,065 - > 00:34:16,034 generally separate their investment holdings in like what 872 00:34:16,034 - > 00:34:19,005 properties they own and what like stocks and bonds they own. 873 00:34:19,034 - > 00:34:21,065 They don't really like think about it as one, one and the 874 00:34:21,065 - > 00:34:22,364 same, to make it simple. 875 00:34:24,699 - > 00:34:26,679 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_13: So if people are - have read this 876 00:34:26,679 - > 00:34:29,559 article or have listened to this episode and now know 877 00:34:29,585 - > 00:34:31,155 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_: Hit me up if you have any questions. 878 00:34:31,155 - > 00:34:32,775 Hit Ed up if you have any questions. 879 00:34:34,690 - > 00:34:36,239 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: what, what, if anything, should they 880 00:34:36,690 - > 00:34:37,909 do with this information? 881 00:34:37,909 - > 00:34:38,130 Or is it 882 00:34:38,315 - > 00:34:39,355 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_13: I don't know, just, just to 883 00:34:39,360 - > 00:34:40,059 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: and have a fuller picture"? 884 00:34:40,235 - > 00:34:40,614 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_: add to that brain, you 885 00:34:40,695 - > 00:34:40,775 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-202: the 886 00:34:40,795 - > 00:34:42,414 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: It's just one more kind of 887 00:34:42,414 - > 00:34:44,315 interesting piece of information to have. 888 00:34:44,675 - > 00:34:46,244 I don't know that there's anything really applicable 889 00:34:46,244 - > 00:34:50,045 unless you're like, uh, you know, running a, you know, 890 00:34:50,045 - > 00:34:54,625 endowment or, you know, um, you know, like a sovereign wealth 891 00:34:54,625 - > 00:34:57,335 fund and, like, want to think about whether to run for the 892 00:34:57,335 - > 00:34:59,815 streets be-because of, like, accounting rules. 893 00:34:59,815 - > 00:35:00,704 But, you know, I don't... 894 00:35:01,525 - > 00:35:03,125 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2026_: I think it, I think it is a - I 895 00:35:03,125 - > 00:35:06,934 think the practical answer is, and, and Rory kind of talked 896 00:35:06,934 - > 00:35:09,494 about the institutional investor who's gonna have significant 897 00:35:09,494 - > 00:35:15,505 money is, there is a lot of squish in the valuation that 898 00:35:15,505 - > 00:35:19,914 your private equity fund is reporting to you on your private 899 00:35:19,914 - > 00:35:24,155 equity position and the underlying valuation of each of 900 00:35:24,155 - > 00:35:27,494 those companies within the pool, which are then aggregated to 901 00:35:27,494 - > 00:35:29,655 come up with a pool, you know, a, 902 00:35:29,954 - > 00:35:30,175 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: Yep. 903 00:35:30,195 - > 00:35:32,275 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2: value or a fund value. 904 00:35:32,275 - > 00:35:36,275 So proceed with caution and don't, you know, basically don't 905 00:35:36,275 - > 00:35:39,224 count those, don't count those dollars before they hit the bank 906 00:35:39,284 - > 00:35:43,144 because they may be particularly, you know, in a 907 00:35:43,144 - > 00:35:46,105 period of rising interest rates or a period of uncertainty, they 908 00:35:46,105 - > 00:35:50,784 may be significantly, overvalued at present relative to what 909 00:35:50,784 - > 00:35:53,164 you'd be able to realize on a transaction. 910 00:35:53,164 - > 00:35:56,414 And that's the kind of the underlying piece of this is 911 00:35:56,885 - > 00:36:00,485 you're gonna get a statement or a report out from your, from 912 00:36:00,485 - > 00:36:03,514 your private equity general partner that says, you know, 913 00:36:03,574 - > 00:36:07,494 "Your, your portion of fund seven is worth eleven and a half 914 00:36:07,494 - > 00:36:10,795 million dollars." eleven and a half million dollars probably 915 00:36:10,795 - > 00:36:11,795 plus or minus 916 00:36:11,855 - > 00:36:12,315 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 917 00:36:13,144 - > 00:36:15,644 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15: because that val- underlying valuations 918 00:36:15,644 - > 00:36:21,235 of the companies within there are s- are so subjective both in 919 00:36:21,235 - > 00:36:25,335 terms of value, uh, which Rory noted, you know, it's tough when 920 00:36:25,335 - > 00:36:27,784 you've got all these components in there that you could go, 921 00:36:27,784 - > 00:36:29,295 "Well, you know, what's the liquidity? 922 00:36:29,295 - > 00:36:35,215 What's the non-liquidity premium?" in terms of timing you 923 00:36:35,215 - > 00:36:40,125 know, that subjectivity really does provide a lot of, you know, 924 00:36:40,125 - > 00:36:42,784 like, like I said, plus or minus twenty percent would not... 925 00:36:42,784 - > 00:36:45,494 To me is actually probably a conservative estimate of how 926 00:36:45,494 - > 00:36:47,844 much that value can be in swing 927 00:36:48,005 - > 00:36:48,364 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 928 00:36:49,469 - > 00:36:50,530 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_13: So that's kinda like what I heard 929 00:36:50,530 - > 00:36:51,800 about nutrition labels, 930 00:36:51,954 - > 00:36:52,514 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_: Oh, really? 931 00:36:52,719 - > 00:36:54,650 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: by, they said like 40 to 50%. 932 00:36:54,760 - > 00:36:56,710 I was like,"40 - like, but then 933 00:36:56,835 - > 00:36:57,155 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_1: No way. 934 00:36:57,155 - > 00:36:57,864 I didn't know that. 935 00:36:58,025 - > 00:36:58,215 Huh. 936 00:36:58,385 - > 00:36:59,284 Not, not surprised, though. 937 00:37:00,369 - > 00:37:00,750 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: Yeah. 938 00:37:00,789 - > 00:37:02,289 It, it - Yeah. 939 00:37:02,329 - > 00:37:04,989 I mean, that might be for dramatic effect, but I think 940 00:37:04,989 - > 00:37:07,369 there is like a argument for like, hey, it's probably like 941 00:37:07,369 - > 00:37:11,380 plus or minus 10%,'cause like, I don't know, like a potato or 942 00:37:11,380 - > 00:37:13,719 something, like a different sized potato or like a package 943 00:37:13,719 - > 00:37:15,429 of something might not have the exact 944 00:37:15,625 - > 00:37:15,934 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 945 00:37:16,335 - > 00:37:16,755 You know what? 946 00:37:16,840 - > 00:37:17,269 emily-sander_1_05-15-: whatever. 947 00:37:17,375 - > 00:37:19,755 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-20: Here's a, here's one takeaway that if, 948 00:37:19,755 - > 00:37:21,914 if, uh, one of our listeners is out there and they're in a 949 00:37:21,914 - > 00:37:24,965 meeting and somebody hands them a deck with all these 950 00:37:24,965 - > 00:37:29,465 performance metrics and they wanna sound smart, they can say, 951 00:37:29,494 - > 00:37:33,059 "Hey Are these values based on fundamental analysis or is this 952 00:37:33,059 - > 00:37:34,039 a GAAP basis? 953 00:37:34,960 - > 00:37:35,900 And you can sound smart. 954 00:37:36,650 - > 00:37:38,909 And I don't know what you can do with that information based on 955 00:37:38,909 - > 00:37:41,940 the answer you get, but you can sound smart asking the question. 956 00:37:43,579 - > 00:37:45,079 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: You can check the smart box. 957 00:37:45,079 - > 00:37:45,550 Check, check. 958 00:37:46,389 - > 00:37:50,489 Um, what, what is this part of the calculation called again? 959 00:37:50,489 - > 00:37:52,210 So there was like impairment on the credit side. 960 00:37:52,210 - > 00:37:52,619 What is like 961 00:37:52,909 - > 00:37:54,068 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: Mark to market. 962 00:37:55,579 - > 00:37:56,940 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_: mark to market? 963 00:37:57,150 - > 00:37:58,590 So people can be creative in 964 00:37:58,688 - > 00:37:59,068 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: Yep. 965 00:37:59,250 - > 00:37:59,900 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_13: to market 966 00:38:00,708 - > 00:38:00,929 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: Yep. 967 00:38:01,030 - > 00:38:01,760 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_13: or analysis. 968 00:38:01,784 - > 00:38:02,065 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2: sound 969 00:38:02,199 - > 00:38:02,449 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 970 00:38:03,429 - > 00:38:04,949 Truly. 971 00:38:05,409 - > 00:38:06,780 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_13: I, in my head, I'm gonna be like, 972 00:38:06,780 - > 00:38:09,730 that is like in the Olympics for figure 973 00:38:10,099 - > 00:38:11,059 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_13: I like your analogy. 974 00:38:11,108 - > 00:38:11,509 I do. 975 00:38:11,769 - > 00:38:12,849 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: score that people 976 00:38:12,949 - > 00:38:13,199 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 977 00:38:13,309 - > 00:38:13,480 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_: it's 978 00:38:13,599 - > 00:38:13,978 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah. 979 00:38:14,000 - > 00:38:14,030 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_130: a 980 00:38:14,248 - > 00:38:15,579 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_: His smile was good while he did the 981 00:38:15,579 - > 00:38:16,208 triple lutz, 982 00:38:16,239 - > 00:38:16,809 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: All right. 983 00:38:16,938 - > 00:38:17,418 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: More score. 984 00:38:17,628 - > 00:38:17,809 Yeah. 985 00:38:18,688 - > 00:38:18,898 Yeah. 986 00:38:19,000 - > 00:38:19,369 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: Yeah. 987 00:38:20,300 - > 00:38:20,630 Yeah. 988 00:38:21,030 - > 00:38:22,559 The performance was, was, 989 00:38:22,568 - > 00:38:22,958 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: Yes. 990 00:38:23,378 - > 00:38:23,728 Yes. 991 00:38:23,878 - > 00:38:26,608 I was moved by this mark to market valuation. 992 00:38:28,208 - > 00:38:31,989 I am moved to commit two billion more to your fund. 993 00:38:31,989 - > 00:38:32,829 I'm so moved. 994 00:38:33,369 - > 00:38:33,818 Yes. 995 00:38:35,858 - > 00:38:36,338 emily-sander_1_05-15-2: Awesome. 996 00:38:36,378 - > 00:38:36,889 Well, I feel 997 00:38:37,239 - > 00:38:37,789 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026_: Oh, good. 998 00:38:37,789 - > 00:38:38,000 Good. 999 00:38:38,070 - > 00:38:38,349 Yeah. 1000 00:38:38,478 - > 00:38:38,809 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026_1: Ed. 1001 00:38:39,110 - > 00:38:39,619 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: Yep. 1002 00:38:40,099 - > 00:38:40,630 Thanks, man. 1003 00:38:41,125 - > 00:38:42,494 big-ed - big-ed-_1_05-15-2026: Go from triple luts to triple 1004 00:38:42,619 - > 00:38:44,059 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-202: Yeah, back to triple putts. 1005 00:38:47,168 - > 00:38:47,289 That's, 1006 00:38:47,340 - > 00:38:47,550 emily-sander_1_05-15-2026: there 1007 00:38:47,639 - > 00:38:48,871 rory-liebhart_1_05-15-2026: that was pretty funny 1008 00:38:54,346 - > 00:38:57,351 If you enjoyed today's episode, please like, share and subscribe 1009 00:38:57,351 - > 00:38:59,001 wherever you get your podcasts.
More from Private Equity Experience
All episodes →- Should Private Equity Soften Its Image? (Why Investors Say Absolutely Not)58 / 100
- YMCA vs. Wall Street: The Multi-Billion Dollar War Over Local Sports55 / 100
- Inside Saudi Arabia’s PIF: Liquidity Pressure, LIV Golf, and the Future of Private Equity Investments
- High-Performance Teams vs Family Businesses in Private Equity
- Why Small Business Owners Are Saying No to Private Equity