Manufacturing Hub · 2026-05-28 · 1h 5m
Change management is the reason most manufacturing improvement projects quietly stall, even when the technical work is sound and the tools are right. Vlad Romanov and Dave Griffith unpack their own change management war stories from across two decades in industrial automation. Vlad frames change management as understanding risk to the business and to every stakeholder, then putting the process in place that lets the organization absorb that risk. Technical feasibility is the easy half of any project. Getting humans to consistently work the new way is the half that wins or loses the budget. Vlad joined Procter & Gamble at a site rated four on P&G's Integrated Work Systems maturity scale, the highest in North America at the time. Every loss event triggered a structured root cause analysis cascade. Operator, mechanic, operations engineer, and only then the engineering department. He later moved to Kraft Heinz, which had purchased the same IWS toolkit from P&G. The tools were on the shelf. The site rating was effectively zero. He had spent his early career learning to use the tools without having to deploy them, and that gap is where most transformation programs die.
Ep. 265 - Automate 2026 Survival Guide: Booths, Networking, and a Production Line Demo #scada #mes50 / 100Ep. 264 - Why AI Loves Automation: Siemens on Digital Twins, Guardrails, and OrchestrationEp. 263 - Why Industrial Protocols Win on Business Not Technical Merit, with Horner AutomationEp. 261 - Change Management in Manufacturing: Operators, Tribal Knowledge, and the Industrial ElderEp. 260 - Why Ignition Is Winning: Colby Clegg and Carl Gould on SCADA, Open Access, & Industrial AI