
LEADERS IN CONSULTING · 2026-06-29 · 1h 4m
Key moments - from our scoring
Substance score
45 / 100
Five dimensions, 20 points each
Dr. Anja Konhäuser, co-founder and partner at Omex, argues that AI adoption has become the critical differentiator in implementation success, not technical capability. She introduces a flipped 80/20 framework: while traditional tech projects allocated 80% of effort and budget to technology and 20% to organizational change, AI projects require the inverse - 20% technology and 80% organizational work. The core issue she identifies is that companies lead AI initiatives with IT task forces, treating them as infrastructure projects similar to ERP implementations, when the actual challenge lies in workflow redesign, workforce retraining, and managing employee fears around obsolescence. Konhäuser emphasizes that understanding client-specific business contexts, workflows, and regulatory environments before implementation is essential. She stresses the three critical dimensions - people, process, and technology - must be balanced; when projects stumble, it's typically because the human and process components were underestimated. Her doctoral research on innovation adoption now proves invaluable for helping clients navigate AI change management, particularly in the post-implementation "hypercare" phase where individual team members need personalized support to discover how AI enhances their specific roles rather than replaces them.
Most fail because companies approach AI as a technology-only project led by IT, underestimating the organizational, process, and people components. They lack deep understanding of existing workflows before implementation and neglect the post-implementation phase where teams must discover how to work effectively with the new solution.
Traditional tech projects allocated 80% of resources to technology and 20% to organizational change; AI projects require the inverse - 20% for technology and 80% for organizational adoption, change management, and helping teams adapt their workflows.
FOBO (Fear of Being Obsolete) is employee anxiety that AI will eliminate their role or make their skills irrelevant, exemplified by workers who have built their identity and routines around specific tasks that AI can now perform in seconds.
AI hypercare requires hyperpersonalized support where each team member receives tailored guidance to develop their own new routines and discover their unique role in working alongside the AI solution, rather than standard training and infrastructure support.
This means understanding the client's specific business challenges, workflows, market conditions, and constraints before proposing an AI solution, ensuring the implementation actually solves the right problem rather than forcing a predetermined technical solution.
Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.
The episode surfaces a handful of genuinely useful ideas - the 80/20 budget flip from tech to org, the four-persona adoption framework, the need for hyperpersonalised post-go-live care, and the tactical point that skeptics should be trained by internal peers rather than external consultants. However, these are embedded in a long, meandering conversation with significant padding, host self-referencing, and repetitive summaries that dilute the useful-ideas-per-minute ratio considerably.
back in the days, 80% has been tech, 20% has been organization around it, and today tech has become very easy. 20% is tech, 80% is organization
if they are skeptical, they need someone from their like company community and their crowd. So you also have to think of who's the best counterpart to train that skeptical group
The four-persona model (enthusiasts, skeptics, overwhelmed, rejectors) mirrors Rogers' diffusion-of-innovations categories without meaningful extension, and anchors like 'people-process-technology triangle' and 'fall in love with your problems not your solutions' are widely recycled consulting tropes. The 80/20 budget inversion has some freshness in the AI context, and the point that AI projects cannot be run like legacy IT projects is sensible but not contrarian.
fall in love with your problems and not with your solutions
whenever there is um certain hesitation or a delay, something in the triangle of people process technology got lost along the way
Dr. Konhaeuser is a genuine practitioner - co-founder of a 300-person firm with 15 years of real implementation work across industries and geographies, a PhD directly applicable to the subject, and hands-on exposure to both digital transformation and transaction advisory. She is not a career podcast guest, though she operates below the tier of operators who have run programmes at landmark scale or can speak from publicly documented, high-stakes transformations.
We are now 15 years old... We have 300 employees today
my PhD thesis... was about innovation adoption
The episode provides one concrete anecdote (the shift-planning employee with 10-plus years of unbroken last-week schedules who is suddenly obsolete) and clear 80/20 budget claims, but never names a single client company, cites a measurable outcome, or quantifies ROI or time-to-value from a real engagement. Country-level cultural observations (France more open, US shorter decision cycles) are asserted without data.
There was one employee responsible for the shift planning of the production plant, doing this um one week per month, always at the end in the last week of the month, and not taking holidays in that specific week for the past plus 10 years
we directly set up the business cases to make it very easy for the management to decide where they want to start
The host asks reasonable follow-on questions - requesting persona distributions, probing cultural differences, pushing for a practical playbook for small firms - but never challenges a claim, requests evidence for an assertion, or introduces productive friction. Extended host self-disclosure (the vibe-coding anecdote) repeatedly displaces time that could have sharpened the guest's answers.
what distributions do you most of the time uh find in companies between these four personas or in teams?
why are leadership teams neglecting the people side then?
Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.
Send us Fan Mail AI projects fail because leadership assumes deploying the tool is the finish line. In this episode, Dr. Anja Konhaeuser , Co-Founder and Partner at OMMAX, explains why AI transformation cannot be treated like a traditional technology rollout. The real challenge starts once the solution is live: employees need to trust outputs, workflows need to change, roles need to be redefined, and leadership needs to actively model the new behavior. Drawing from OMMAX’s work with clients across AI, data, and digital transformation, Anja shows why the old 80/20 logic has flipped: AI may now be 20% technology and 80% organization. For consulting leaders, this episode offers a clear view of where AI projects really succeed or stall: not in the technical build, but in whether people, processes, and leadership behavior change after implementation. You’ll learn: 1. Why AI adoption requires more than technical deployment 2. How leaders misread AI when they treat it like an IT rollout 3. What employee groups need different adoption strategies 4. Why visible leadership behavior determines trust in AI 5. How consulting delivery changes when adoption becomes the real work ___________ Dr.
Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.
1 - > SPEAKER_00: I would I always tend to say it's an 8020 rule 2 - > and that's 8020 changed. 3 - > It's not applying to any case that we are working on at the 4 - > moment, but it gives you a very good idea of what we are talking 5 - > about. 6 - > So back in the days, 80% has been tech, 20% has been 7 - > organization around it, and today tech has become very easy. 8 - > 20% is tech, 80% is organization.
9 - > And organization is exactly the part of understanding the 10 - > workflows before. 11 - > It doesn't start after it has been implemented. 12 - > The before is really, really relevant to be able to find the 13 - > perfect solution. 14 - > I always love to say, fall in love with your problems and not 15 - > with your solutions.
16 - > SPEAKER_01: Welcome to the Leaders in Consulting Podcast. 17 - > I'm Sammy, your host and founder of the community. 18 - > In this show, I speak to CEOs, partners and MDs of consulting 19 - > firms about their best practices and hard-worn insights. 20 - > If you're keen to join the conversation visit 21 - > leadersinconsulting.
com to find out how you can connect with 22 - > peers at our summits, peer coaching sessions, and monthly 23 - > confidential forums in your city. 24 - > And now, let's get started with the show. 25 - > Today I am very happy to welcome Dr. 26 - > Anja Kohnhäuser, co-founder and partner at Omex to our show.
27 - > Welcome Anja. 28 - > SPEAKER_00: Hi, hi Sammy, good to see you. 29 - > SPEAKER_01: Yeah, nice to have you with us. 30 - > And uh the very interesting topic that you brought, which is 31 - > basically AI and how to implement it at your clients, 32 - > um, which is a little bit controversial to what most um 33 - > yeah C Devel executives at companies maybe think about it, 34 - > or maybe even consulting leaders.
35 - > But before we dive into that, tell me a little bit more about 36 - > OMAX and what you're doing. 37 - > SPEAKER_00: I am co-founder and partner at Omax. 38 - > Uh, we are supporting a lot of clients either on transaction or 39 - > on digital transformation. 40 - > And we are their partner in the area of tech, data, and AI.
41 - > We do both. 42 - > We strategize and we implement. 43 - > And uh we are talking today a bit more about our AI work and 44 - > what it means to be an external partner for a lot of 45 - > entrepreneurs and for a lot of mid-sized and mid-sized 46 - > companies, large companies and corporates, and helping them 47 - > navigating through the AI noise in a very dynamic world that we 48 - > are facing ourselves in at the moment. 49 - > Being their sparing partner, being their implementation 50 - > partner, being a shoulder to hold on and uh giving an ear, 51 - > listening uh to their worries and thoughts and dreams, uh, 52 - > what they are having in their mind.
53 - > This is what we do with our Max. 54 - > SPEAKER_01: Very cool. 55 - > And I still remember one sentence that you said well, 56 - > creating the AI solution is easy, implementing it is hard. 57 - > Um, and we'll definitely some consulting leaders who are 58 - > listening are still struggling with creating the AI solution, 59 - > but there's still a long way to go once you have the capability 60 - > inside of your own company.
61 - > Um When did you start, Omax? 62 - > Which year? 63 - > SPEAKER_00: We are now 15 years old. 64 - > SPEAKER_01: And how many employees do you have now?
65 - > SPEAKER_00: We have 300 employees today, and um we split 66 - > them a bit into uh tech data AI experts and uh also experts that 67 - > are supporting on the market side digitalization and internal 68 - > digitalizations. 69 - > SPEAKER_01: And you have a very interesting background because 70 - > after our pre-interview, I asked, well, how did you come up 71 - > with your cool uh way of implementing and and you wrote 72 - > your doctor thesis um about it? 73 - > What was the title of your um thesis?
74 - > SPEAKER_00: So the title was Dealing with Innovation from a 75 - > Sales Management Point of View, and it was about innovation 76 - > adoption, and I think the word adoption will accompany us in 77 - > the next minutes quite a lot. 78 - > And I never thought that there would be a second spring for 79 - > this thesis, but there it is. 80 - > So adoption is um more relevant than ever, and stuff that I have 81 - > already investigated in my PhD is um helping me to implement, 82 - > in this case, AI.
83 - > Um, back in the days I was focusing on innovation, on 84 - > product innovation mainly. 85 - > But also AI is a relevant innovation of our time, and this 86 - > is now yeah, more relevant than ever to make sure that people 87 - > accept, understand, and adopt what is happening there. 88 - > SPEAKER_01: Yeah, and we are right now recording it on the 89 - > 13th of March 26th, and um I think most of the big AI LM 90 - > companies are starting to partner very strongly with 91 - > consulting companies.
92 - > So it's not like AI is killing consulting, AI needs consulting. 93 - > SPEAKER_00: Yes, exactly. 94 - > And also the the companies, I have the feeling, Sami, they 95 - > realize that there's so much going on in the market, and it's 96 - > also very hard, even if they built up their own AI data tech 97 - > entities and strengthened their team in the past years. 98 - > Now it is a very good momentum for consulting companies that 99 - > walk the talk and that really deliver measurable results.
100 - > And we also come to the measurement uh topic later on as 101 - > well. 102 - > And um, this is for us a big chance in the market. 103 - > SPEAKER_01: Yeah, and I like this positivity because I had so 104 - > many conversations that are not so positive, but I also think 105 - > that you have to have the right look at the market and the 106 - > opportunities that there are due to new technology, and that's 107 - > why I really look forward to our conversation now. 108 - > So um, you you are an expert with your company in in AI and 109 - > AI implementation.
110 - > Um and especially what we singled out in our pre-interview 111 - > is that AI adoption is basically one of the keys. 112 - > So, what are the key barriers that you see at the clients that 113 - > you you help uh develop and implement AI solutions that um 114 - > that hinders them from basically having the impact that they want 115 - > to have? 116 - > SPEAKER_00: So when we speak, it depends always on certain uh 117 - > environments and companies have always specific situations they 118 - > are facing themselves in.
119 - > Um, one very big observation obviously is now at the moment 120 - > when we are talking with them about AI, that firstly, to set 121 - > the scene, we as a consultancy company always have to take the 122 - > time on our end to understand the specific situation our 123 - > client company is in. 124 - > May it be how the market is, how the clients are, how the 125 - > technology standards are, if there's regulation in place, if 126 - > there's any dependency, whatever it is.
127 - > So it's even more important today on a consultant side to 128 - > understand the peculiaries and the specifics of the company on 129 - > the client side. 130 - > That being said, if we then said, if we then look on the 131 - > client side, we see that if they struggle with measuring the 132 - > impact, some of them looked at an AI concept as a pure 133 - > technical concept, for example. 134 - > So they approached it with a very technical task force coming 135 - > from the IT, and thinking that it's a technology-only operation 136 - > that they are now starting, forgetting about the big 137 - > influence something like that might have on routines, on 138 - > workforces, on workflows, also even on roles, and that makes 139 - > them stumble throughout the process because they forgot 140 - > about the human part, the people part, and also the process part.
141 - > So whenever there is um certain hesitation or a delay, something 142 - > in the triangle of people process technology got lost 143 - > along the way. 144 - > And those triangles is super crucial to be successful today. 145 - > SPEAKER_01: So um it seems like technology, that's what um many 146 - > of your clients tick off and say, yeah, yeah, we can figure 147 - > that out or we figured it out, but they uh they are what are 148 - > why are leadership teams neglecting the people side then?
149 - > SPEAKER_00: I don't think that they neglect it actively or 150 - > underestimated. 151 - > They underestimate it completely because the past experiences 152 - > have been that tech projects have been guided and monitored 153 - > by IT teams for certain sub-departments or certain 154 - > infrastructures, and then there have been trainings, there have 155 - > been a hyper care phase, and the tech infrastructure has been 156 - > implemented. 157 - > So the history of tech projects has nothing to do with what we 158 - > see and do now in AI projects.
159 - > And if you then make the mistake of parking it as a tech project, 160 - > you just adopt the wrong expectations and the wrong 161 - > mechanism and the wrong rollout plan because it is something 162 - > different than a tech project. 163 - > And I don't think that they are neglecting it actively and say 164 - > we don't need it. 165 - > They just um most of the times didn't expect it uh that they 166 - > would stumble over something like that later on. 167 - > SPEAKER_01: And why is it different now?
168 - > SPEAKER_00: It is different now because if you really deal with 169 - > AI solutions, this has a tremendous impact on how you do 170 - > your business today. 171 - > So the tech involvement and also the tech influence and what 172 - > those, I mean, you even experience it yourself, what 173 - > those solutions now come up with is much bigger and much intense 174 - > and broader as you would have expected it at the beginning. 175 - > When you use yourself even privately LLMs to support you 176 - > and work with those, what you can get out of those LLMs is 177 - > really significant and remarkable.
178 - > And I think this applies very well also to the professional 179 - > area. 180 - > What those AI solutions can do within companies and the depths 181 - > and the breadth of the analysis or whatever the use case is, um, 182 - > is so tremendous and changing to and not comparable to anything, 183 - > and changing infrastructure as it is thought of and built up 184 - > today causes simply that people didn't expect it to be that wide 185 - > when it comes to the influence on different areas in their 186 - > companies.
187 - > SPEAKER_01: Yeah, I can imagine. 188 - > I mean, I see it with our very small company, and we have some 189 - > roles that suddenly use AI and LLMs and workflows on a daily 190 - > basis, and they output basically 20-fold more output now, where 191 - > people really suddenly had the fear of losing their job by 192 - > Sammy. 193 - > Do we need as many people? 194 - > And do I have to be afraid?
195 - > And at least for us, it's no. 196 - > And now they can do cooler stuff where we didn't have the 197 - > resources to do before. 198 - > But I all like, and we are like a company of young people who 199 - > are willing and able to learn and are are open in our culture 200 - > to speak up. 201 - > So I can imagine in a bigger company, it these fears are 202 - > there and these hesitants are there, and um that might do you 203 - > see something similar where um this basically leads to a shift 204 - > to this is not just tech, this is a lot about people.
205 - > SPEAKER_00: Absolutely. 206 - > It's actually two things that you were uh touching upon. 207 - > One thing being as long as the company hasn't made the 208 - > experience, what is really possible with the new AI 209 - > solution, it is very hard for them to imagine and to further 210 - > develop the existing workflow, the existing workforce, the 211 - > existing routines. 212 - > It is the same as with us with the LLMs.
213 - > As long as you haven't had a touch point with this, with it, 214 - > you cannot imagine what you can do with it and what you can get 215 - > out of it, and how it can influence your daily life and 216 - > how it can influence your routine. 217 - > And by using it, you explore more. 218 - > This same logic applies to a certain extent also to 219 - > professional setups because the teams have to get familiar, have 220 - > to get familiar with what is possible with the AI solution.
221 - > Well, how can it help? 222 - > How can it support me, etc. 223 - > etc. 224 - > This is one part.
225 - > And in our world, coming now again from an analogy with tech 226 - > projects, you did your in the old world, you did your 227 - > analysis, you did your vendor selection, you selected you need 228 - > a tech solution to solve A, B, C challenges. 229 - > You selected the best vendor, you implemented it, you rolled 230 - > it out, and it sold A, B, C of your solutions as it was 231 - > planned. 232 - > Now, with AI coming in, there are so many solutions, so many 233 - > challenges, challenges that it can solve, which brings to an 234 - > existing complexity in the companies, another layer of 235 - > complexity, which is how can the teams now work best with what 236 - > they have been now implemented and what they have been provided 237 - > with, and how can they integrate it in their workforce?
238 - > So we see this being happening that just after everything has 239 - > been implemented and set up, the teams really start to get 240 - > familiar and develop their own logics and workforce and 241 - > routines. 242 - > And yes, the second dimension that you mentioned is fear of 243 - > being obsolete. 244 - > So the FOBO, um, coming from the FOMO analogy. 245 - > Fear of being obsolete means people are afraid that they are 246 - > not needed anymore.
247 - > So I had a situation last week. 248 - > There was one employee responsible for the shift 249 - > planning of the production plant, doing this um one week 250 - > per month, always at the end in the last week of the month, and 251 - > not taking holidays in that specific week for the past plus 252 - > 10 years, because this is her task to do. 253 - > So fully committed, she's uh prioritizing this, even 254 - > sometimes over her private uh stuff that she has, just being 255 - > there because this is now her relevant workflow and where 256 - > she's responsible.
257 - > Understanding now that this is not needed anymore in an era of 258 - > AI, that shift planning is done within milliseconds, and to kind 259 - > of make it a bit extreme from an um comparison point of view, and 260 - > it's been done in milliseconds, and she doesn't need to be there 261 - > anymore. 262 - > And of course, this causes questions, worries, and also 263 - > without giving them an answer, what do you do in your last week 264 - > of the months, or what can you then instead kind of fill your 265 - > your time, is one also at the same time of the most seen 266 - > mistakes that we see, that we focus too much on the AI 267 - > solution and too much too much on what is happening until we 268 - > have the solution, and we neglect the post-AI integration 269 - > phase, which we called back in the days hypercare.
270 - > But hypercare today really means sometimes hyperpersonalized 271 - > care, because every single member of the team that is now 272 - > working with the new AI solution has to find his or her new 273 - > routine and new way of realizing the potential that he or she has 274 - > in her uh business hours. 275 - > SPEAKER_01: So, Anya, if you take basically 100% of the 276 - > budget that if a company buys you as a consulting company and 277 - > um and compare it how the budget was allocated between technology 278 - > creation and implementation and also taking the people along 279 - > back in the day with traditional technology and now with AI, how 280 - > did it shift?
281 - > SPEAKER_00: I would I always tend to say it's an 8020 rule 282 - > and that 8020 changed. 283 - > It's not applying to any case that we are working on at the at 284 - > the moment, but it gives you a very good idea of what we are 285 - > talking about. 286 - > So back in the days, 80% has been tech, 20% has been 287 - > organization around it. 288 - > And today, tech has become very easy.
289 - > 20% is tech, 80% is organization. 290 - > And organization is exactly the part of understanding the 291 - > workflows before it doesn't start after it has been 292 - > implemented. 293 - > The before is really, really relevant to be able to find the 294 - > perfect solution. 295 - > I always love to say fall in love with your problems and not 296 - > with your solutions, because it always sounds so inviting that 297 - > if you just implement this and that um solution, you would just 298 - > add that module that of your already existing infrastructure.
299 - > You can do these 10 use cases, and this will make your lives 300 - > easier. 301 - > A lot of solutions did a very good job when it comes to their 302 - > marketing and sales approach. 303 - > A lot of companies underestimate the relevance of really taking 304 - > the time double-clicking in their existing infrastructure 305 - > and uh team workflows setup to understand where the real 306 - > problems and pain points are. 307 - > And that should then be the focus of the AI solution.
308 - > SPEAKER_01: That's uh I mean that's a big shift, but that's 309 - > also the hope for the consulting industry, so to say, because 310 - > then um it's still a people job to help people um go all the way 311 - > to also um leveraging the new technology and maybe, or not 312 - > maybe, for sure, accomplish much more than before. 313 - > SPEAKER_00: Yes, exactly. 314 - > And as I said earlier, we had we really have seen that companies 315 - > are welcoming external sparing partner that are entrepreneurs 316 - > themselves, like we are, that are seeing a lot of different 317 - > situations.
318 - > This is why I mentioned that we are doing transaction advisory 319 - > at the beginning. 320 - > Within that tech due diligences, AI due diligences, by the way, 321 - > is also a very popular topic at the moment because investors or 322 - > corporates that are buying other companies, they want to know how 323 - > can AI push, how can I grow, can I grow with AI and what is the 324 - > risk that is coming, what is disruption risk coming from the 325 - > AI side. 326 - > Um and this gives us a very uh big knowledge base where we see 327 - > different companies from the inside and we can support as a 328 - > really educated sparring partner and help them navigate through 329 - > that storm.
330 - > Um, and this is like the first part, and then the second part 331 - > is being emotionally intelligent enough to understand what the 332 - > different teams and how they set up and how we can make it work 333 - > based on an AI tech layer. 334 - > SPEAKER_01: And one thing that really stuck with me is that you 335 - > before a project starts, you even analyze uh the employees 336 - > and categorize them into different personas, which then 337 - > um helps you basically also in later phases when you start to 338 - > implement and roll out the solutions.
339 - > Can you take us on that journey and what that looks like? 340 - > SPEAKER_00: Yeah, sure, sure. 341 - > So, and this is coming a bit also out of my uh HD, PhD, 342 - > sorry, it is coming also out of my PhD thesis that I wrote a 343 - > couple of years ago. 344 - > Um where we realize that not everyone is obviously starting 345 - > his or her AI journey on the same level.
346 - > It is even, it is so hard for me to do an AI speaker engagement 347 - > on um whatever event, because you never know the level of 348 - > knowledge people are having in the audience. 349 - > And it's so hard with that buzzword to give something, 350 - > bring something to the table that is really able that 351 - > everyone understands it. 352 - > And that's similar when we are entering new companies. 353 - > So when we enter new companies, we have to understand firstly, 354 - > on the top level management leadership team.
355 - > How do they think about AI? 356 - > What is the history they have with AI? 357 - > Did they have already some experience, touch points, 358 - > pilots, or whatever? 359 - > Then how is their setup internally?
360 - > Then how is their setup internally? 361 - > Do they have um already a Very good tech basis and 362 - > understanding and very good tech and data management. 363 - > These are kind of different layers which give us already 364 - > where we can draw a picture of the company's status quo. 365 - > And the last element you are talking about is that we have to 366 - > understand, depending on in which teams we start with our AI 367 - > engagement, how those teams are thinking about the topic of AI.
368 - > And it cannot be, as we did it in the past, that there's then 369 - > the team layer and all fits one kind of logic. 370 - > It's more that we split the team into four different groups. 371 - > The first group is the enthusiastic group. 372 - > So they are super interested, they are open, they tried it out 373 - > themselves.
374 - > They are, they can't wait for us to get started. 375 - > And we have to utilize them as well as positive influencers and 376 - > uh understand how they can support our initiatives that we 377 - > want to uh drive within the company. 378 - > And we make them kind of co-designers of the work 379 - > streams, so not just testers, but even owners, so to say. 380 - > So we have the enthusiasts.
381 - > The second group is skeptical. 382 - > Skeptical um is often at the moment, I would say, the largest 383 - > group, especially even in regulated sectors, as you can 384 - > imagine. 385 - > And um they are not anti-technology, they are just 386 - > risk sensitive. 387 - > So um they are more coming from the perspective if something 388 - > goes wrong, am I accountable?
389 - > They kind of um they need some some guidance, they don't really 390 - > understand what is uh going on, but they need to be convinced to 391 - > a certain extent. 392 - > SPEAKER_01: Sorry, I didn't want to interrupt you. 393 - > SPEAKER_00: No, please, are these? 394 - > SPEAKER_01: Are these the ones who are uh afraid of that job?
395 - > The skeptics? 396 - > SPEAKER_00: Yes, as well. 397 - > As well. 398 - > They just don't know what is going on and uh why it is 399 - > happening, and they heard some uh nightmare stories about AI, 400 - > they can repeat them uh like in the meetings, and they what they 401 - > need is basically transparency, a human in the loop, clarity, 402 - > clear boundaries, trust, and um also training to a certain 403 - > extent helps to shift them between the different kinds of 404 - > uh not everyone has to become an enthusiast.
405 - > I I will touch upon this uh also uh uh at the at the end, but you 406 - > get the the framing around skepticism, uh skepticism. 407 - > The third one are the ones that are completely overwhelmed. 408 - > And this is different because this group is underestimated. 409 - > And um, if someone is overwhelmed, they are a bit more 410 - > like they are either already overloaded, they are afraid of 411 - > not being able to use the tool, to utilize the tool, maybe even 412 - > of a different interface they have to work with.
413 - > And AI feels to them. 414 - > They are also coming from a very technical standpoint. 415 - > They are really coming from not one more tool, I have to learn, 416 - > I have to use, I'm even overwhelmed with the tools that 417 - > I have today. 418 - > This is a bit the overwhelmed um group.
419 - > And the fourth group are the rejectors. 420 - > So you always have in organizations a certain 421 - > percentage of people who openly resist and say um they have a 422 - > fear of the whole AI itself, uh, if this isn't bad in general for 423 - > the whole society. 424 - > So they question the whole um movement that is going on, and 425 - > they are very strict about not being willing to participate in 426 - > the projects, and they also openly, in most of the cases, 427 - > address that they don't believe in AI and they don't want to use 428 - > AI because the company has been working successfully in the past 429 - > years, or um, they have been working successfully in the past 430 - > years on their job and they don't need it.
431 - > So this is the uh the fourth group. 432 - > SPEAKER_01: In a in a normal setting, and I know that can 433 - > vary by industry or company size, or even by company, what 434 - > what is what distributions do you most of the time uh find in 435 - > companies between these four personas or in teams? 436 - > SPEAKER_00: So you have usually when companies work with us, 437 - > there's a certain bias already. 438 - > So this may be being um put uh as at first.
439 - > If companies work with an external party, there is already 440 - > a certain uh openness towards AI support. 441 - > This might highly influence how the structure is. 442 - > But what we see is um a good portion of enthusiasts, and I 443 - > also want to highlight that we try to identify them across 444 - > teams. 445 - > Because even if we start with an AI initiative in a certain team, 446 - > that doesn't mean that not other enthusiasts from other teams 447 - > that are willing to participate and support this initiative 448 - > might be relevant to push in general the AI journey of the 449 - > company in a certain direction, right?
450 - > So even if we now start in the HR department, for example, uh, 451 - > or in production, then you would still try to uh identify 452 - > together with the leadership team and the sponsor of the 453 - > project, maybe other enthusiasts in the team. 454 - > So um, but I would say usually the smallest, the smallest group 455 - > is uh is the rejectors. 456 - > The smallest group is the rejectors, I would say. 457 - > Then we have um followed by the enthusiasts, and then we have 458 - > the largest group with the skeptical ones, and then a 459 - > certain degree of overwhelmed ones.
460 - > This correlates as well with the age of the um team members. 461 - > Yeah, this is how I would frame it a bit. 462 - > SPEAKER_01: And do you see also cultural differences? 463 - > Because I know that you you don't only work in the 464 - > German-speaking um area, but also in other countries.
465 - > SPEAKER_00: Yes, we do. 466 - > We do have in certain European countries a larger portion of 467 - > enthusiasts. 468 - > And this also, I would say, um, highly correlates with how the 469 - > whole country is dealing with the AI infrastructure. 470 - > So we see that France is very open when it comes to AI 471 - > solutions.
472 - > Interesting. 473 - > Yeah, we see that there is more openness, and in um in the UK as 474 - > well, we have certain skeptical um movements that we see, but 475 - > also the openness is is higher. 476 - > SPEAKER_01: Do you also have touch points with the US? 477 - > SPEAKER_00: Yes, we also have touch points with the US.
478 - > In the US, I mean the US frames AI as the next big thing. 479 - > And a lot of AI companies move to the US because they are they 480 - > have a much bigger playground and a much they have much more 481 - > tailwind when it comes to the whole AI infrastructure. 482 - > And yes, this can also be seen when it comes to decision 483 - > cycles, much shorter in the US, also um willingness to kind of 484 - > risk a pilot. 485 - > So you don't know if it really works out, and the openness is 486 - > much larger in the US, I would say.
487 - > And the people are more open uh towards that uh development that 488 - > we see there. 489 - > SPEAKER_01: Very interesting. 490 - > Um now you know when you start a project, um, who in the teams 491 - > were you started with um falls into which of these four 492 - > categories. 493 - > What do you do with this information?
494 - > How do you use it to basically then um develop or also roll out 495 - > um the AI solution for that specific company, Anja? 496 - > SPEAKER_00: So um we do not necessarily know it for every 497 - > single team member. 498 - > It also depends if companies in Germany tend to have a 499 - > Betriebsrat. 500 - > If they have that, uh obviously it gets more complex in um 501 - > defining that on a personal level.
502 - > And I actually don't necessarily need to know it on a person 503 - > level. 504 - > I more need to understand what are the percentages per group, 505 - > because depending on if we have more skeptic people than 506 - > rejecting people, we would adapt the rollout. 507 - > So what we do is once we understood how, and we measure 508 - > more than just those four kind of groups, we also have a look, 509 - > as I said, on how is data management generally handled? 510 - > How trusted is the leadership team when implementing changes 511 - > in workflows?
512 - > So you also have to kind of measure and get an understanding 513 - > of is the team actually following the leadership team 514 - > and the management on that journey? 515 - > Is the leadership team or the management able to stand for an 516 - > AI journey in that company? 517 - > Or do we firstly have to work on the reputation and on the 518 - > positioning of the management when it comes to AI initiatives? 519 - > Because it also needs a lot of trust.
520 - > And um, if you have a management that is not trusted when it 521 - > comes to AI initiatives, is not utilizing it themselves, is not 522 - > um capable of explaining what an LLM is, or never had built an 523 - > agent themselves and wants the whole team to do it tomorrow, 524 - > this kind of doesn't get together, right? 525 - > So you can only support those companies when you have 526 - > different dimensions of um, yeah, different dimensions in 527 - > place of influence factors that make the project successful.
528 - > And the personas are one part, but there are some others that 529 - > are really, really, really relevant to make sure that the 530 - > team also understands we are tackling it holistically, 531 - > end-to-end. 532 - > It is nothing that we do now once, and everyone gets like an 533 - > LLM app on his or her smartphone, and then that's it. 534 - > When you really want to drive it into an AI journey, you usually 535 - > have to redesign the workforce, have to redesign sometimes 536 - > leadership structures, also redefine roles to make sure that 537 - > the company is um successful in the mid and long run.
538 - > SPEAKER_01: Understood. 539 - > Um but coming back basically to the simplified question of um 540 - > assuming everything else is equal and you you just know that 541 - > a team is more leaning onto the enthusiastic side on the 542 - > skeptical side, or which maybe you don't even see, and then we 543 - > don't even have to talk about it more, they reject us. 544 - > SPEAKER_00: If we see that, then kind of the rollout is planned 545 - > exactly on those persona percentage groups.
546 - > So if there are people that are more skeptical, the topic of 547 - > training plays a more important role. 548 - > If we see we have more enthusiasts, we let them build 549 - > something. 550 - > The skeptical ones, they are not so much into directly starting 551 - > to build something. 552 - > The skeptical ones, they need trust.
553 - > The skeptical ones, they need trust and information first. 554 - > The enthusiastic ones, they can start building already like the 555 - > next day because they can't wait for the stuff to start. 556 - > And exactly those little examples gives you maybe a 557 - > better understanding how we can, and also who is training them is 558 - > also a very important component. 559 - > So if you have skeptical ones, it is not always ideal if we are 560 - > only training them from the outside as an external service 561 - > provider.
562 - > So if they are skeptical, they need someone from their like 563 - > company community and their crowd. 564 - > So you also have to think of who's the best counterpart to 565 - > train that skeptical group who is already trusted because we 566 - > are potentially not, they don't know us. 567 - > We are an external service provider. 568 - > But who within the team can teach them to make sure they 569 - > listen and trust?
570 - > And we just emphasize, maybe also with benchmarks and show 571 - > them, and this also is generating trust. 572 - > Look, other companies that have your size, your market access, 573 - > your client base, are doing it in this kind of way and are 574 - > utilizing AI on in those situations, and that makes them 575 - > relate and understand what is possible, and uh they lose the 576 - > skepticism um faster. 577 - > SPEAKER_01: Okay, very good. 578 - > What do you do?
579 - > Like, do you even see more overwhelmed teams as well? 580 - > This is happening. 581 - > SPEAKER_00: It depends on um on the industry. 582 - > Yes, we also see overwhelmed teams, and overwhelming is then 583 - > also um very important because what we then stumble over is 584 - > maybe not ideal um tech integrations of the past.
585 - > So they have some legacy on their desks. 586 - > Tools, technology that never have been properly implemented, 587 - > and they need workarounds and they need to do something very 588 - > difficult because certain things haven't been solved in the past 589 - > years, and they just don't want to get another tech tool on 590 - > their desks. 591 - > Yeah. 592 - > And those overwhelmed teams, what you usually do there, you 593 - > go two steps back, you understand the infrastructure 594 - > that they have today, why they are overwhelmed, if you can 595 - > maybe even fix something of their daily work already up 596 - > front because they are overwhelmed because something 597 - > runs is not running ideally today in their uh daily work.
598 - > And then you go one step closer to, and if we have now fixed 599 - > this, uh you can you can now work with the AI. 600 - > But here, especially training and training made easy and being 601 - > easily implemented in their daily work is super, super 602 - > relevant because taking them out a full day won't also move the 603 - > needle. 604 - > They need on a continuous basis uh being accompanied through 605 - > their own AI journey and learning how they can work with 606 - > us and learning workflows.
607 - > SPEAKER_01: And now, and but as you said, that rarely happens. 608 - > Uh, the majority of people where you have rejectors. 609 - > SPEAKER_00: Yeah. 610 - > SPEAKER_01: So you don't have to have a playbook for those 611 - > because it's always a minority.
612 - > Or do you have a playbook for those? 613 - > SPEAKER_00: I mean, we do have a playbook where rejection comes 614 - > from. 615 - > We need to understand why they reject. 616 - > Um whatever the reason is, the reasons can can vary depending 617 - > on the teams or whatever.
618 - > And um we then actually, especially when it comes to the 619 - > rejectors, speak closely with the leadership teams and the 620 - > management in how far we should turn them around, if we can turn 621 - > them around, and if we kind of um can align it with certain 622 - > initiatives that maybe are already running within the 623 - > company to not bring even more topics on their table if they 624 - > are rejecting it. 625 - > But this is a very difficult group. 626 - > But you have to measure it, you have to get an understanding how 627 - > big they are, because they might act as negative influences.
628 - > And uh this is why you have to have them on your agenda. 629 - > And I think the I mean, it's a people business then at the end 630 - > of the day. 631 - > Understanding why they reject is actually most of the times the 632 - > key, but you can also never, never turn around anyone. 633 - > SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
634 - > Yeah, it seems like a lot of work that you have to do to get 635 - > the whole team up and running. 636 - > Um, but in the end, like putting on the head of the CEO, I 637 - > definitely would like everyone in the team to embrace it and to 638 - > be enabled. 639 - > So I understand that it's not just a solution, it's like uh 640 - > getting everybody up to speed in the company. 641 - > And I mean, the upside is crazy.
642 - > SPEAKER_00: The upside is crazy, and what I also always tend to 643 - > say with an eye on the rejectors, I'm I strongly 644 - > believe that it is not only the task of the company to train 645 - > their people when it comes to AI solutions and what AI can do and 646 - > how AI can support you. 647 - > I also think that everyone, given that tremendous shift that 648 - > we are in, finding ourselves, if you, I mean, I have three kids, 649 - > if you have kids, etc., you are living in a world where AI gets 650 - > more and more relevant and you are exposed every day to a lot 651 - > of agents everywhere without recognizing it.
652 - > There's a lot of stuff going on, you cannot ignore it. 653 - > And it cannot only be the task of the company and the employer 654 - > to give this knowledge to the people. 655 - > I also strongly believe that people themselves have to 656 - > undertake responsibility living in that AI era to understand 657 - > what is going on. 658 - > And if they decide not to do that, they might then also not 659 - > want to work in a company that embraces AI.
660 - > SPEAKER_01: Yeah. 661 - > Yeah, you touch a point where I have to touch um my own nose. 662 - > So I basically uh wipe coded for the first time a tool, um, a 663 - > financial Ebit forecast planning tool for ourselves, just because 664 - > I wanted to learn how wipe coding works, never did it 665 - > before. 666 - > And um and then I did it two weeks ago.
667 - > It took me like a day um of time with all the iterations, but now 668 - > it's it's working, it's really cool. 669 - > And um, and I even used all these tools that our CTO uses 670 - > that I never heard before, like Superbase Vercel. 671 - > Um, all this it's like uh now I understand what it means and 672 - > what you can do with this, but that also showed me that um our 673 - > leadership team, um everyone should have done that, not just 674 - > me. 675 - > Yeah, and why am I the only one who has done it up to now?
676 - > And we started to have a conversation around that, and 677 - > and um and if we are not the ones, like you said before, who 678 - > are embracing it and and seeing the value and just building 679 - > something for ourselves just to see how it works, how can we 680 - > expect it from our employees to go all the way? 681 - > SPEAKER_00: Yeah, yeah. 682 - > So the the energy the top management is putting into the 683 - > AI is uh very relevant when it comes to that shift within the 684 - > companies.
685 - > Yeah, and it has to be visible to the employees as well. 686 - > So it's really relevant, and this is why it's not only a tech 687 - > project anymore. 688 - > Uh there should be people and culture sitting on the table, 689 - > there should be also internal communication sitting on the 690 - > table, because if you really want to turn around that um AI 691 - > mindset and develop an AI mindset in the company, it 692 - > should be reflected uh in the in, as I said, in the roles, in 693 - > the performance talks.
694 - > And um then also it should be visible for the team what the 695 - > top management is doing when it comes to AI. 696 - > SPEAKER_01: Yeah. 697 - > Um now shifting basically to um yeah, how it looks like in 698 - > practice when you have a client. 699 - > Um, I assume often it is the CEO says, yeah, I mean, we have to 700 - > embrace this technology, we have to do something.
701 - > Um, let's get started. 702 - > Um what happens then? 703 - > They they call you, so they know they need outside help. 704 - > SPEAKER_00: Yeah, they know they need outside help.
705 - > Then uh, as I said, we understand uh what their status 706 - > quo today is. 707 - > Do they have did they have experience? 708 - > How's their data management? 709 - > How's their tech management?
710 - > How is uh how open is the workforce? 711 - > Have there been already touch points in the AI infrastructure? 712 - > And we better understand uh what they want to achieve because 713 - > this is one of the first uh stumbling blocks. 714 - > If they call us, they are not so sure.
715 - > They cannot break it down to a KPI what they really want to 716 - > achieve with it. 717 - > They have a bit of an idea where it can lead to, but getting that 718 - > in kind of in information and definition at the beginning is 719 - > super relevant because then we speak about the same thing and 720 - > we define the same thing as being successful or not. 721 - > And if it is successful, it has to be measured. 722 - > SPEAKER_01: Um but as you said, um most CEOs or or leadership 723 - > teams don't know exactly where what they want to uh use this 724 - > cool new opportunity that is like we talk we talk about AI, 725 - > but there's like a myriad of solutions out there, and you 726 - > could do a lot of things.
727 - > And and um how do you help them like in these First steps, how 728 - > does it look like until you find a topic or say, ah, or maybe you 729 - > don't find one topic and all your tests? 730 - > So, how how does it look like in practice when you do that? 731 - > SPEAKER_00: So there's the case companies come to us and say, I 732 - > want to have more AI in my HR department. 733 - > Then it's quite clear, then we go into the HR departments.
734 - > Another example is that we meet CEOs and they say, AI, I have 735 - > the feeling and I'm convinced AI can help me to do my business 736 - > different, um, more efficient, more modern in the future. 737 - > Where do I start? 738 - > And this, where do I start is for us then a signal that we 739 - > really have to go through the different departments, speak 740 - > with the different departments, understand how they work today, 741 - > and define those use cases. 742 - > So, and this is also an exercise a lot of companies have already 743 - > done in the past weeks and months.
744 - > So, this is my perception. 745 - > This was different 12 months ago, but now companies do have 746 - > an understanding of where potential lies. 747 - > If not, then we start really going step by step through the 748 - > different departments, understanding also their 749 - > relevance, their size. 750 - > Um, also, again, here looking at the um more intuitive things and 751 - > things where we expect a lot of potential, looking in those 752 - > first, understanding the openness, understanding how the 753 - > team reacts, understanding also the investment chances and the 754 - > investment strengths that company has to invest in AI in a 755 - > certain department, and how this turns out and uh can be like 756 - > turned into a positive ROI in which amount of time.
757 - > So, what we basically always do is not only the use case 758 - > definition for the most relevant five to ten use cases of every 759 - > area, we directly set up the business cases to make it very 760 - > easy for the management to decide where they want to start. 761 - > And this is also for the board meetings, et cetera, then uh the 762 - > document where they then decide together, okay, let's do this 763 - > because this has the highest impact, or you have different 764 - > kinds of uh KPIs that you that you look at.
765 - > And it also depends semi on the situation the company is in at 766 - > the moment. 767 - > Do they want to save costs? 768 - > Do they want to scale further? 769 - > Are they limited in growth?
770 - > Are they uh about to enter a new market and do not want to build 771 - > up a complete team there? 772 - > Do we have a green field to a certain extent to scale the 773 - > company further? 774 - > So very different use cases, but you always have to like come 775 - > from where the company is today, understand the setup, and 776 - > evaluate with an entrepreneurial mindset what is the next best 777 - > action, where should they focus on, and what is the solution 778 - > that fits best to this um to this exercise and to this 779 - > ambition that we define together.
780 - > And here you have most of the most of the times you have a 781 - > certain legacy, may it be IT infrastructure, may it be data 782 - > that is somewhere unstructured. 783 - > And this is then um something that we need to understand very 784 - > fast in combination with how the people are kind of behaving when 785 - > it comes to AI, and we make with those different uh kind of 786 - > components our plan, how we can support the company, who is 787 - > leading the project on the client side.
788 - > As I as I said earlier, do we need internal communication? 789 - > Do we need people in culture? 790 - > We most of the cases need IT, we need I we need security, we need 791 - > the data uh component, and of course the top man management 792 - > also being in line. 793 - > We even offer Sami that we do AI masterclasses for the leadership 794 - > team and the management before we start.
795 - > SPEAKER_01: Cool. 796 - > SPEAKER_00: Like coming back to the point I mentioned earlier, 797 - > the top management is then the one who has to stand before the 798 - > team and stand up for the topic of AI and uh confidently discuss 799 - > those topics together with the team and guide them in through 800 - > this through this vision, define that vision together with the 801 - > team. 802 - > And this is why it's super crucial that they themselves own 803 - > the topic.
804 - > Yeah. 805 - > SPEAKER_01: Understand. 806 - > It's super interesting. 807 - > Um on the one hand, um, yeah, I understand how you work with 808 - > bigger companies.
809 - > On the other hand, I always think about my own company and 810 - > think what we can learn from what you just say. 811 - > And I already took a lot of things with me, so that's super, 812 - > super cool. 813 - > Um, now this is the Leaders in Consulting Podcast. 814 - > So everything you set up to know was how like your product, so to 815 - > say.
816 - > So, how do you enable your clients to win and how do you 817 - > win projects through this? 818 - > But um, it also changed the work, how you were um basically 819 - > helping your client. 820 - > So um the two-folded question is basically how did this whole um 821 - > AI product I call it? 822 - > Yeah, it's a lot of things, but um, let's call it AI product, 823 - > change how you operate, and does it have an impact on the type of 824 - > people you employ and the basically um historical um 825 - > pyramid that you have as a consulting company, where you 826 - > have a few people on top and many juniors, and the juniors 827 - > tickle up over time, become fewer, and so that builds the 828 - > leadership of the future.
829 - > SPEAKER_00: Yes, so we do see that, especially for those AI 830 - > projects, and it's actually applying to any project I just 831 - > referred to, need a very, very good and profound senior 832 - > steering from our end. 833 - > So you really need people that have experience from the 834 - > industry, that have a very good understanding of tech, of data, 835 - > that are understanding what is going on on the AI front, can 836 - > answer any kind of question. 837 - > So you go away, and I mean at Omarx, we have always had this 838 - > focus on tech and data.
839 - > So for us, it is not so super new. 840 - > But if you speak of traditional consulting roles, I see that 841 - > especially the senior teams, they need now to understand. 842 - > We all have to go back to that kind of university and learn how 843 - > AI is going, what AI is enabling us, how can we um how can we 844 - > implement AI? 845 - > What are the use cases?
846 - > So I see for us as consultants, it is important to be on top of 847 - > things, to understand what is going on. 848 - > And I also see that you need, for certain cases, a lot more 849 - > senior leaders, because it's not as you said it, as you said it 850 - > right, traditionally you had one senior partner steering the 851 - > project, and then there was the middle management, and then 852 - > there was like the junior supporting. 853 - > Now that AI adoption work, that AI implementation work needs to 854 - > be done by people that really know what they do and they can 855 - > relate with the people on the client side, and they are 856 - > usually not juniors, right?
857 - > So we do see the shift that when it comes to the staffing of the 858 - > projects, that we need more seniors there to deliver it. 859 - > And this highly influences also our hiring strategy that we have 860 - > um more seniors that we want to win, because this is this is 861 - > also where you build up the client relationship. 862 - > And this maybe again, what does it change for the consultants? 863 - > The consultants now need to be also much broader, not only the 864 - > tech part, not only the data part, but also the people part, 865 - > the whole adoption part.
866 - > Um you always say it and read it like in your Instagram feed, 867 - > emotional intelligence is so important, but it really is now, 868 - > because if you cannot put yourself in the shoes of the 869 - > people that are working there in that company and what their 870 - > fears are and what their um questions are, it will be very 871 - > hard for us as consultants to guide them through that journey. 872 - > And this makes our, at the same time, our senior profile 873 - > expectation much more complex.
874 - > SPEAKER_01: That sounds like a lot of change that you went 875 - > through in your own organization and used to go through. 876 - > SPEAKER_00: And in addition, what we also have is we have a 877 - > team that is dedicatedly working with the newest AI tools, um, 878 - > getting familiar with the hot stuff out there, um, because no 879 - > one has done this in the past 20 years up and down, has 880 - > experienced it in the different situations that you find in the 881 - > client infrastructure.
882 - > So you need kind of a lab, or yeah, you need an you need a 883 - > team, an internal, like an RD department, if you want. 884 - > So that enables us and gives us knowledge and gives us the 885 - > chance to try out things. 886 - > And this is not how you usually imagine a consulting company to 887 - > be set up, right? 888 - > SPEAKER_01: Not originally.
889 - > No, it was the old pyramid, and the partner is hunting and then 890 - > coming flying in from time to time. 891 - > That's how I know it when I was a consultant, and that's 892 - > basically it. 893 - > But that is changing apparently, and has a big impact on the 894 - > consulting industry. 895 - > SPEAKER_00: Yes, and also we have to make sure that our team 896 - > is trained.
897 - > So making sure our team is really trained on all levels is 898 - > also something that changed a lot. 899 - > It's not the usual training that you had in the past where you're 900 - > like doing it while you were driving somewhere. 901 - > No, this is a real training where you really have to 902 - > generate knowledge because you will fall back if you if you 903 - > don't generate that knowledge. 904 - > This also changed.
905 - > SPEAKER_01: But that's a good like guiding post for other 906 - > consulting leaders to say, okay, we don't have it yet, but I see 907 - > it in big organizations. 908 - > So I I talk to this kind of department or people within this 909 - > department and Capgemini invent. 910 - > And they are um at this forefront that you're just 911 - > describing, um, like they are super enthusiastic. 912 - > So I mean it's easy, you pick the enthusiasts to do that, I 913 - > assume.
914 - > Um and and they are amazed by what's possible, and they bring 915 - > this change then uh with workshops and and whatever into 916 - > the whole organization with thousands of employees. 917 - > SPEAKER_00: Yeah. 918 - > unknown: Yeah. 919 - > SPEAKER_01: So it's working in a in a very, very big setting and 920 - > it's working in a boutique setting.
921 - > Um so there's no reason not to do it yourself now if you're a 922 - > consulting leader. 923 - > No. 924 - > If you um now could like imagine um a senior consulting leader 925 - > who's maybe even owning his own boutique consulting company, um, 926 - > who says, Yeah, we are not that far on the change towards that. 927 - > We didn't even implement any AI project.
928 - > I roughly have an idea what that could be, but I never really I 929 - > use ChatGPT and that's it, so to say. 930 - > Um what would be the high-level steps that you would advise 931 - > those leaders to take? 932 - > SPEAKER_00: So I think that status quo analysis is something 933 - > that should be intuitively doable for any leader in 934 - > consulting. 935 - > So understand your own workflows and identify those areas where 936 - > you say this is where AI can really make a difference and 937 - > support me.
938 - > And uh, by the way, I uh what I, for example, use a lot is the I 939 - > have an uh AI integration into my Excel and into my PowerPoint. 940 - > So find those little, maybe even AI solutions when you say it's a 941 - > rather smaller company and they haven't started. 942 - > This makes a big difference already. 943 - > So if you have a smart interface, AI-based interface in 944 - > your daily routine that you can easily integrate, I think the 945 - > most important thing, and this is again highly correlating with 946 - > the adoption piece, it has to be easy accessible and easily 947 - > usable in your daily workflow in Excel and in PowerPoint.
948 - > And also, what I do a lot is um when it comes to big uh PDFs, 949 - > big market studies, whatever, I transform them into podcasts and 950 - > uh listen to them because it's easier to consume and we are 951 - > getting less used to read a lot of texts all the time and like 952 - > focus our concentration on long texts is not always very easy. 953 - > So it helps as well to um uh listen to them. 954 - > Uh something like that is already helping a lot. 955 - > SPEAKER_01: Okay, very good, Tanja.
956 - > So we are already at the end of our conversation. 957 - > I have a couple of rapid fire questions left for you. 958 - > Um so consulting is still uh a tough sport, and you even have a 959 - > family on top with kids. 960 - > How do you keep body and mind fit and sharp?
961 - > SPEAKER_00: I defend Sundays. 962 - > I think this is super relevant for me as a working mom, that 963 - > Sunday is non-negotiable uh for the for the kids. 964 - > And if it's not the Sunday, because I have to go to a um 965 - > client meeting already Sunday evening, then it's the Saturday. 966 - > I um do uh breastwork that helps me personally, uh no matter 967 - > where.
968 - > Uh ideally when no one recognizes, standing in a queue, 969 - > for example, so no need to get half an hour in your calendar 970 - > won't work. 971 - > I don't have that half an hour. 972 - > SPEAKER_01: Yeah. 973 - > And uh, can you give us one one simple routine that everybody 974 - > could adapt right away?
975 - > SPEAKER_00: If you if you stand in the in the queue and wait at 976 - > DM for paying your your stuff, you breathe in four seconds, you 977 - > hold it four seconds, you breathe out four seconds. 978 - > You do this three times, and it gives you a bit of a centering 979 - > and a bit of a relaxation. 980 - > And I really believe for me personally, it works. 981 - > It sounds a bit um um esoteric, but uh I really get uh fresh 982 - > power from that.
983 - > And you can wire your brain to use that little moment for 984 - > relaxation. 985 - > And maybe one thing which I also do, and I can only um recommend 986 - > before I dial in in a call, I take 10 seconds. 987 - > What is my role in the call? 988 - > What do I want to get out of the call?
989 - > What points do I want to bring up in that call? 990 - > So, what is the content and what is the next best action? 991 - > So, my role, what do I expect? 992 - > What is the content and what is the next best action?
993 - > Doesn't necessarily take 10 seconds, gives you the chance to 994 - > be sharp in that meeting and not stumble from one meeting to the 995 - > next and forget what you actually want and who you are 996 - > and how many. 997 - > SPEAKER_01: Very cool, and that is all actionable. 998 - > I love it. 999 - > Thanks a lot again.
1000 - > Um do you have a favorite book right now? 1001 - > It doesn't have to be a business book, it can. 1002 - > SPEAKER_00: A favorite book, I love you are the placebo. 1003 - > It's a very nice book.
1004 - > And I also read Um Why We Sleep at the Moment from Walker, which 1005 - > is also a nice book too. 1006 - > I like those neuroscience kind of stuff, and those two are um 1007 - > good to read, I would say. 1008 - > SPEAKER_01: Why the first one? 1009 - > SPEAKER_00: You are the placebo gives you um resilience.
1010 - > SPEAKER_01: Okay, very good. 1011 - > We put it into the show notes. 1012 - > Um, what is the biggest challenge of being a consulting 1013 - > leader that nobody talks about, Tanya? 1014 - > SPEAKER_00: Too little sleep.
1015 - > So we manage somehow, but I think the uh this is why I'm 1016 - > reading. 1017 - > Why are we sleeping? 1018 - > Why do we sleep? 1019 - > Um from Walker, because uh this is uh really a challenge at the 1020 - > moment.
1021 - > SPEAKER_01: Yeah, yeah, I can imagine uh on top being your 1022 - > mom, um that that is definitely not making it easier. 1023 - > SPEAKER_00: Yeah. 1024 - > SPEAKER_01: Um who should be um our next podcast guest for our 1025 - > leaders and consulting show, who should we try to win? 1026 - > SPEAKER_00: You should try to win uh Remy from Singulier.
1027 - > Remy CEO of Singulier. 1028 - > SPEAKER_01: I don't even know Singulier. 1029 - > What is it? 1030 - > SPEAKER_00: It's a consulting company.
1031 - > SPEAKER_01: Okay. 1032 - > It sounds French. 1033 - > SPEAKER_00: Yes, it's French. 1034 - > They have an office in Munich and an office in the UK, and um 1035 - > I think it's interesting to speak with him.
1036 - > SPEAKER_01: And why? 1037 - > SPEAKER_00: Because it's an interesting character, and he's 1038 - > bringing in that French perspective, which you tackled 1039 - > as well from an international point of view. 1040 - > And I was thinking of Finn when you asked that question, and it 1041 - > he could bring in a bit more of how they do it in France and 1042 - > what we can maybe learn as well in the German setup. 1043 - > SPEAKER_01: Um that would be interesting.
1044 - > Because I'm pretty sure uh from Germany, looking at France, if 1045 - > you don't have touch points, you see them differently than they 1046 - > are in fact. 1047 - > Yes. 1048 - > And you saying they're leading something, I don't think many 1049 - > Germans are thinking France is leading in AI or in adoption. 1050 - > So that could be super interesting.
1051 - > I try to um to get them on the show. 1052 - > Um, and now it's time for you to tell us what you need from us. 1053 - > So a lot of consulting leaders, partners MDs of small and big 1054 - > companies listening. 1055 - > Is there anything we can help you with, Anya?
1056 - > SPEAKER_00: No, I just uh for me it's always important to embrace 1057 - > AI that I have people that understand that AI is the 1058 - > future, it won't get away anymore. 1059 - > We have to control it, embrace it, and make the best out of it, 1060 - > no matter if it's with an external service provider or 1061 - > not. 1062 - > But we should not fall back and ignore it. 1063 - > So every person that is open to AI tries it out, experiments 1064 - > with it.
1065 - > This is kind of my mission to uh giving an impulse and influence 1066 - > them to try it out. 1067 - > SPEAKER_01: And how could people best get in touch with you? 1068 - > SPEAKER_00: Through LinkedIn. 1069 - > SPEAKER_01: Okay, we also put your LinkedIn profile into the 1070 - > show notes.
1071 - > So thanks a lot for taking us on this journey. 1072 - > I I really like the the the whole angle that you you showed 1073 - > us and that um, well, it's not just about having the solution. 1074 - > Solution is a little part of implementing the whole the whole 1075 - > package to make a client successful. 1076 - > So thanks a lot, Dania.
1077 - > SPEAKER_00: Thank you, Sami, was a pleasure. 1078 - > SPEAKER_01: Thank you for listening to the Leaders in 1079 - > Consulting podcast. 1080 - > To learn from and go with fellow consulting leaders in person, 1081 - > apply to join our monthly confidential forums and peer 1082 - > coaching in your city. 1083 - > Visit leadersinconsulting.
com for details. 1084 - > See you soon.
Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.