
Hosted by The #1 Podcast for ClimateTech Entrepreneurs
We are CleanTechies, the #1 Podcast for ClimateTech Entrepreneurs. Whether you’re an active ClimateTech entrepreneur, an aspiring one, an investor, a service provider…anything that touches supporting early stage climate tech, this is the place for you.
289 episodes · publishes weekly · latest 2026-07-03 · ~49 min/episode
Rank
#335
Substance
78.0
/ 100
Breakdown
Scored 2026-07
Updated monthly
Across the index
#335 of 6182
Substance
Top 5%
outscores 95% of the index
CleanTechies Podcast ranks #335 on The B2B Podcast Index with a substance score of 78.0 out of 100, scored across 1 recent episode. It scores highest on specificity & evidence and guest caliber. The episode is notably concrete in key areas: named deal counterparties, exact capacity figures, safe harbor mechanics (5% threshold, 105-day rule), specific dates separating domestic content delivery from regulatory tables, and named third-party partners (Novogradac, SolarEdge). Weak spots are team size, margins described only as 'modest,' and revenue figures withheld due to private-company status.
Averaged across 1 recently scored episode, with cited evidence.
There are genuine operational insights - open-book cost-plus selling, leveraging IRS Friday guidance drops for Monday competitive advantage, and the safe harbor 5%/105-day mechanics - but they are spread thin across a 59-minute runtime padded with lengthy sponsor reads, host political commentary, and repetitive affirmative summaries. The real substance is concentrated in maybe 20 minutes of the episode.
“The IRS will typically drop their, their guidance on a Friday. And so if we can figure it out and then come to market and start engaging in conversations, uh, on a Monday, uh, versus. Our competitors are gonna have to go back to their, their tax council”
“we sell open book. And so we will actually share all of our costs with our clients, um, and allow them to basically pick and choose which cost of components, domestic, non domestic. They want in their module”
The open-book, cost-plus selling approach used to create a competitive moat before safe harbor tables even existed is a genuinely non-obvious practitioner move. The framing of policy timing as a speed-based competitive advantage is also fresh. However, most other advice - geographic territories, face-to-face relationship building, coin-operated comp - is standard B2B sales doctrine.
“we were effectively contracting and selling and delivering modules with domestic content before there was a safe harbor table, which means the only way to qualify your project was to get the cost from your manufacturer”
“pretty sure still are the only manufacturer today that's willing to open the kimono, as Martin says, and share our costs and share our gross margins and share or factory overhead”
Riesenberg is a credible, working practitioner - CCO of what is described as the largest US domestic solar module manufacturer, in the industry since 2008 - and speaks from genuine operational experience including named multi-gigawatt deals and hands-on policy navigation. He is not a career podcaster or thought-leader, but the depth of insight he volunteers stays at a fairly surface level for most of the conversation.
“a 1.5 gigawatt deal that we did with uh, Nextamp. They're the, the US's largest community solar developer. And we also completed a 2 gigawatt um, offtake agreement with a uh, utility scale developer, uh, based out of Minneapolis, um, called Excelsior Energy Capital”
“we've got 1.3 gigawatts of capacity now here in the US. That's across three different lines”
The episode is notably concrete in key areas: named deal counterparties, exact capacity figures, safe harbor mechanics (5% threshold, 105-day rule), specific dates separating domestic content delivery from regulatory tables, and named third-party partners (Novogradac, SolarEdge). Weak spots are team size, margins described only as 'modest,' and revenue figures withheld due to private-company status.
“we were shipping modules with domestic content starting In July of 2023, um, the safe harbor tables that people are using to uh, qualify their projects for the bonus now came out in May of 2024”
“Safe harbor...they would need to take title of the goods that they, that they spent money with us on no later than 105 days after there's a three and a half month rule”
The host occasionally lands a useful follow-up - probing whether open-book pricing creates customer pushback - but far more often responds with extended affirmative summaries, unsolicited political commentary, and self-promotional tangents that consume guest airtime. Sharp claims (e.g., 'the only manufacturer willing to open the kimono,' 'very low turnover') go completely unchallenged.
“Had that or has that created any challenges by being so open?”
“Yeah, no, that, that's really helpful. Now I'd be really curious, um, to get a little bit of a, we don't need an entire history lesson.”
First period on the Index - history builds from here.
1 scored on substance · 61 tracked in total.
Add this badge to your site - it links back here and updates automatically as you rank.
<a href="https://index.fame.so/show/cleantechies-podcast" target="_blank" rel="noopener">
<img src="https://index.fame.so/badge/cleantechies-podcast/badge.svg" alt="Ranked #49 on The B2B Podcast Index" width="360" height="136" />
</a>Track CleanTechies Podcast's rank
Get an email whenever this show moves up or down the Index. Monthly at most, no spam.
The themes that come up most across this show's episodes.
Podcasts that dig into the same topics.