The B2B Podcast Index
Index
All categories
MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
MethodologySubmit
Best of:MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
An independent project byFame
SearchBest episodesGuestsInsightsMethodologySubmit a podcast
Index/Sales/Breaking BizDev
Breaking BizDev artwork

Navigating the Price Increase Conversation

Breaking BizDev · 2026-06-22 · 27 min

0:00--:--

Key moments - from our scoring

Substance score

35 / 100

Five dimensions, 20 points each

Insight Density9 / 20
Originality7 / 20
Guest Caliber7 / 20
Specificity & Evidence5 / 20
Conversational Craft7 / 20

Consultants and service firms regularly face the uncomfortable task of asking existing clients for price increases, yet many treat these conversations with far less rigor than the original sales process. Mark Wainwright and John Tyreman explore the multiple contexts where this arises - from change orders and additional service requests in engineering and architecture to annual fee adjustments in wealth management and monthly retainer increases in consulting. The core issue isn't the increase itself but poor preparation: consultants often get emotional and defensive, clients face constrained budgets and unexpected hits, and the lack of upfront clarity about scope creates assumptions that later trigger requests for more money. The hosts argue that price increase conversations must be treated as new sales opportunities, requiring the same discovery discipline, three-option proposal framework, and value communication used in the initial engagement. Offering clients only one number during an existing contract erodes trust; they feel trapped with no alternatives. By using three-option proposals and foreshadowing future possibilities upfront, firms can reduce surprise increases and, when they do become necessary, have built the foundation to discuss them as natural evolutions rather than aggressive upsells.

Key takeaways

  • →Price increase conversations fail because they receive a fraction of the energy and rigor invested in the original proposal and sales process.
  • →Offering a single take-it-or-leave-it price number to existing clients during contract expansions feels coercive and erodes trust far more severely than presenting one number to a prospect.
  • →Three-option proposals with a high-priced 'foreshadowing' option ahead of time reduce scope creep surprises and establish context for future increases.
  • →Scope changes often stem from unstated assumptions during discovery; clearer upfront definition of what is and isn't included prevents many conflicts later.
  • →Inflation in long-term relationships (five-plus years) compounds into painful deltas if not addressed annually, making incremental yearly conversations far easier than large retrospective adjustments.

Topics in this episode

Discovery processThree-option proposalsScope creep and change ordersAdditional service requestsChange orders and change order managementHourly billing and rate increasesMonthly retainer feesAssets under management (AUM) fee structuresWealth management pricingPrime consultant and sub-consultant relationships

Questions this episode answers

What are the main scenarios where consultants need to ask clients for more money?

Change orders and additional service requests for scope outside the original agreement; annual percentage adjustments in wealth management based on assets under management; hourly rate increases to keep pace with inflation or cost-of-living; and monthly retainer increases when the scope of work expands beyond what was contracted.

Why do price increase conversations fail more often than the original sales pitch?

Because they receive far less energy and attention, catch clients off guard as unexpected, and often present only one number rather than options - making clients feel trapped and coerced since they're already committed to the contract and can't easily walk away.

How should you present a price increase to an existing client?

Use the same sales discipline as the original engagement: conduct discovery to understand priorities, then present three-option proposals with a spectrum of recommendations, rather than a single non-negotiable number that feels coercive and erodes trust.

What's the long-term cost of not raising prices annually in multi-year relationships?

Inflation and underpricing compound over time; delaying increases for five or ten years creates a painful, large gap that's harder to justify and explain, whereas incremental annual conversations with small adjustments are far easier to navigate and feel more reasonable to clients.

How do unstated assumptions about scope lead to price increase requests?

If scope boundaries aren't clarified upfront during discovery, clients naturally assume certain elements are included; as work unfolds and both parties recognize the gap, consultants must either absorb the work or request a change order, both of which create tension that earlier clarity could have prevented.

What our scoring noted

Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.

Insight Density

9 / 20

The episode has one genuinely useful structural insight - repurposing the high-priced option from the original proposal as a future reference point when scope expands - but that idea is repeated and stretched thin over 27 minutes of conversational filler and hedging. Most other advice (do discovery, treat renegotiation like a new sale) is surface-level and padded.

the high priced all-in option is the, is the tool that we use to foreshadow the future
We picked option B, but we f- lo and behold, we found ourselves wandering towards, you know, this, this high option

Originality

7 / 20

The three-option Goldilocks framing is well-established pricing psychology, not fresh thinking. The mild novelty is anchoring a future renegotiation to a high option the client previously declined, which is a concrete application - but the episode doesn't frame it as contrarian or dig into why consultants systematically under-price long-term relationships.

And then we come back to our wonderful Goldilocks, our middle option
we have to use great three-option proposals with, this spectrum of recommendations when we go ask for more money

Guest Caliber

7 / 20

No guests - both hosts are working practitioners in professional services consulting and podcast marketing at boutique scale. They speak from genuine experience but represent small solo/micro-firm operations, limiting the depth and scale of the lessons shared.

Mark Wainwright, principal consultant and founder of Wainwright Insight, the fractional sales manager and sales consultant to professional services firms
I priced my services a few years ago around me, myself being a solo consultant

Specificity & Evidence

5 / 20

Almost no concrete data, named companies, or real dollar figures. The episode relies entirely on vague, anonymised anecdotes and generic scenario-building. The only empirical data point offered is an unattributed inflation statistic, and the percentage references are illustrative rather than evidential.

a dollar today only buys about 72 cents of what it did just 10 years ago
we're 10% over here, we're 20% over here

Conversational Craft

7 / 20

The hosts attempt some structure through a mock 'quiz' segment that briefly sharpens the conversation, but the episode is otherwise a collaborative, unchallenging exchange between two like-minded co-hosts. There is no pushback, no probing follow-up, and no productive disagreement - claims go entirely unchallenged.

Are you gonna quiz me, Mark?
So if we're gonna, if we're gonna give them some, give them three options at this point... what would the low option be?

Conversation analysis

Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.

Most-used words

option36mark32john31wainwright26tyreman24client23high23scope22point17price16increases13relationship13consultant12options12sure11clients10

Episode notes

Asking an existing client for a price increase is one of the most stressful, sweat-inducing conversations a consultant can have, often catching the client off guard and triggering defensive reactions. So instead of presenting a take-it-or-leave-it ultimatum, professionals must treat these fee increases with the exact same rigor and discovery process as a brand-new sales opportunity. In this episode of Breaking BizDev , John and Mark explore how to gracefully manage scope creep, handle inflation, and structure your requests so that both the client and consultant walk away happy. In this episode, you'll learn: Why presenting a single-number price increase feels like an ultimatum and damages trust. How to treat expanding scopes and fee adjustments as a fresh discovery opportunity. The exact 3-option structure (Low, Middle, High) to confidently present your new pricing. How to use a "High Option" to set boundaries and reveal the true cost of unconstrained scope creep. Why you must periodically audit your existing engagements to realign with what your client values now . Share your feedback in our listener survey :

Full transcript

27 min

Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.

1 - > Mark Wainwright: There comes a point in most client-consultant 2 - > relationships when the consultant needs to ask for more 3 - > money, and it can be tricky. 4 - > How do we navigate these conversations? 5 - > Let's talk about it in the podcast 6 - > John Tyreman: All right. 7 - > Welcome doer-sellers, marketers, firm owners, consultants of all 8 - > stripes to another episode of "Breaking Biz Dev."

I'm John, 9 - > he's Mark, and today we're going to talk about how to ask for 10 - > price increases. 11 - > This is gonna be a fun episode, Mark. 12 - > Mark Wainwright: Yeah, I have multiple immediate situations in 13 - > my consulting work. 14 - > I deal with this all the time.

15 - > there's a ton of energy, a lot of focus that goes into the 16 - > original proposal. 17 - > Sometimes there's these big documents, sometimes there's 18 - > interviews, strenuous sort of intense negotiation around price 19 - > and scope and all that kind of stuff, and there's so much 20 - > energy that's put on that. 21 - > But, you know, fast-forward six months down the road or so, and 22 - > everybody looks around and says, "Oh, shoot, we have to go sort 23 - > of, kind of do that all over again."

And they, they don't put 24 - > near the amount of energy and attention to it, and it doesn't 25 - > go well. 26 - > John Tyreman: Asking for more. 27 - > So what does that look like, Mark? 28 - > I mean, there's a few different, like, uh, you can ask for more 29 - > in a few different ways, and we've got a couple of kinda like 30 - > different scenarios here.

31 - > So why don't you paint a picture for our audience? 32 - > What are we talking about? 33 - > Mark Wainwright: different industries have, different 34 - > situations, maybe project-based firms, you know, engineering 35 - > firms, architecture firms, you know, all that kind of stuff, 36 - > right? 37 - > It's, it's they'll have these things called, uh, additional 38 - > service requests or additional service agreements, it's some, 39 - > some amount of work that, that was maybe unexpected, maybe 40 - > outside of the scope, they have a, a process that they use to, 41 - > go ask for more, maybe there's change.

42 - > These are also called change orders, you know, that are 43 - > driven by changes in scope. 44 - > that's a term that, people use. 45 - > we're also talking about annual increases, and I have worked 46 - > with wealth management firms in the past, and, you know, they'll 47 - > charge their clients a, percentage based on their assets 48 - > under management. 49 - > And at some point, those relationships, you know, could 50 - > be early on, it could be a years-old relationship.

51 - > Sometimes they have to go back to their clients and make an 52 - > adjustment in that, in that percentage. 53 - > Um, and I, I've experienced this in the work that, that I do. 54 - > We've talked a little bit about, how I structure my business. 55 - > I'm based on a, on a set monthly amount that is, agreed to with 56 - > my clients.

57 - > And if I work with clients long enough, I start looking at that 58 - > number, and I say,"Hey, we might need to change that." I don't 59 - > know what's... 60 - > You're, you're, you've done a similar thing, yeah? 61 - > John Tyreman: Yeah.

62 - > Just recently actually I've, uh, my business has grown to the 63 - > point where I've had needed to increase my overheads, bring on 64 - > an accounting firm, um, start to hire some folks to help support 65 - > service delivery. 66 - > So I've, I've had to recently go through this, and I think that's 67 - > one of the reasons why I think this was top of mind in bringing 68 - > this up in our conversations. 69 - > But yeah, this is a, this is a tricky situation. 70 - > It's really tough to navigate, can be very stressful.

71 - > and then it's a challenge in communications and expectation 72 - > setting. 73 - > So yeah, this is, this is definitely top of mind for me. 74 - > Mark Wainwright: for sure. 75 - > And, and then there's just one last little example that, I 76 - > frown upon, that whole hourly billing thing.

77 - > a ton of organizations and professional services, have 78 - > hourly rates that they base, you know, when they're selling 79 - > themselves, 60 minutes at a time, And a lot of times those, 80 - > those rates are impacted by cost of living increases, you know, 81 - > just regular annual increases to kind of keep pace with inflation 82 - > or, you know, promotions or whatever else. 83 - > and you could be an individual that's been working with a 84 - > particular client for a long time, and you've had a 85 - > particular hourly rate, and they're fine with that and 86 - > everything else.

87 - > And then, it's like,"Hey, it's Bob. 88 - > Same wonderful relationship. 89 - > We love working with you guys. 90 - > By the way, I've got an increase in my hourly rate."

And they'll 91 - > say,"Wait, so we're gonna get the exact same thing from you 92 - > this year that we got last year, but we're gonna have to pay more 93 - > for it?" And Bob says,"Oh, yeah. 94 - > Yep. 95 - > John Tyreman: Sorry.

96 - > Mark Wainwright: Sorry." 97 - > John Tyreman: It's really uncomfortable for everyone. 98 - > So the - I guess, Mark, like w- how have you approached this in 99 - > the past? 100 - > And maybe I can share how I've approached this in the past too.

101 - > Mark Wainwright: sure, the fundamental problem here is that 102 - > it's like you said, it's just uncomfortable. 103 - > It's hard, one of the initial things that kind of happens is 104 - > people get emotional. 105 - > Uh, they get defensive. 106 - > You know, they, uh, if you're a consultant, you try to 107 - > rationalize, this, this extra amount.

108 - > If you're a client on the other end of it, you know, you're 109 - > dealing with constrained budgets. 110 - > You're dealing with, results that are still slightly beyond 111 - > your, your reach. 112 - > You know, you're, you're trying to work towards this thing, and 113 - > then, you know, you get hit on the side of the head with some 114 - > random price increase that was kind of unexpected, right? 115 - > So that's...

116 - > The, the, the problem is that it oftentimes catches everyone off 117 - > guard. 118 - > It's oftentimes kind of just, just unexpected. 119 - > We haven't, we haven't prepped well enough for it, so it's kind 120 - > of unexpected and n- it's, it's nobody likes it, right? 121 - > That's the fundamental problem is that actually the consultants 122 - > don't like asking for more money.

123 - > They're like, they just wanna deliver the work and get paid 124 - > for what the original amount was, and we're fine. 125 - > The clients don't like to get this. 126 - > So it's just a bad situation, right? 127 - > That is the fundamental problem is that nobody's happy about it, 128 - > John Tyreman: I suppose like, at least in my experience, what 129 - > happened in my, my case where I needed to go out and, and ask 130 - > for more for a price increase was because I'm bringing on 131 - > overhead.

132 - > Um, but there's also the scenario that has happened to me 133 - > in the past where we agree on an, in a, a scope of work, but 134 - > then that scope of work just kind of like balloons a little 135 - > bit. 136 - > You know, it, it, it expands in areas we didn't anticipate at 137 - > the onset. 138 - > And like you, Mark, I operate on a fixed monthly fee as well. 139 - > And so the - if the scope increases to a certain point, 140 - > you know, there's natural breaks where it makes sense to like 141 - > come together and have that conversation.

142 - > So that's kind of how I approached it was w- after that 143 - > 12-month contract,"Hey, let's take a look at the work we've 144 - > done. 145 - > This is what, this is what we're gonna need to do moving forward. 146 - > Here's a couple options," and we'll get into that down the 147 - > road. 148 - > But that, that's kind of how I approached it.

149 - > Mark Wainwright: sure, sure, sure. 150 - > Things change, right? 151 - > There's the, the, the scope changes. 152 - > We were doing A, B, C originally in this first period of time, 153 - > month, year, whatever it was.

154 - > Now we're doing B, C, and D, and D's more complex where we're 155 - > doing A, B, C, and D, or we've added that, you know. 156 - > So it's, they're shifting situations. 157 - > So, so it happens because the scope kind of changes. 158 - > John Tyreman: And w- what's fr- what's frustrating to me - Hold 159 - > on, Mark.

160 - > Before we go on, I just, I just, I, I just gotta get it, get this 161 - > off my chest. 162 - > What's frustrating is, is I've had this, this one client and, 163 - > um, we agreed on a scope of work, started down that, down 164 - > that path, everyone's happy, and then a month later,"Oh, w- w- 165 - > let - we need to do this. 166 - > Let's do this. 167 - > Let's do this," from the client.

168 - > And it's like, we just talked about this. 169 - > We just talked - That's, that's out of scope. 170 - > Mark Wainwright: And that can be driven by an, bunch of different 171 - > things. 172 - > And, and one is, a word that we touch on quite frequently is, 173 - > assumptions.

174 - > if you are not clear enough up front, the client can have some 175 - > assumptions that certain, certain elements, certain things 176 - > were just part of the deal. 177 - > You know, they were just included. 178 - > And it takes a little bit of time, I think, for everyone to 179 - > get more and more clear that, oh, in fact, it was not. 180 - > So now you're wrestling with this as a consultant, you're 181 - > wrestling with it and you're saying,"Oh man, I want to keep 182 - > this client happy, so maybe I just wrap that in."

consultant's 183 - > looking at it going,"Wow, that's a good bit of work. 184 - > I don't know if I can. 185 - > I want to keep those folks happy." So there's a little bit 186 - > of wrestling there.

187 - > So it brings some added tension to it as well. 188 - > another driver of this, I kind of touched on this before, is 189 - > that, you know, just annual increases, in some situations, 190 - > this can be sort of, there can be like a multiplier effect in 191 - > that maybe there's a team of consultants, and a lot of times 192 - > if people are familiar with this, like in the world of, you 193 - > know, large engineering projects or architecture projects, 194 - > whatever else, you'll have a, sort of a central consultant, 195 - > you know, they'll refer to it as the, the, the prime consultant 196 - > who is sort of the lead consultant, and then those folks 197 - > will need to go and hire a bunch of sub-consultants, other people 198 - > who have other expertise that need, need to, to, to be brought 199 - > to bear on the, on, on, on the project.

200 - > And the multiplier effect is, like it's not just you, it's not 201 - > just your organization, right? 202 - > All of those people who are working underneath you as 203 - > collaborators or sub-consultants, you know, come 204 - > knocking, right? 205 - > So it's not just you having to go. 206 - > It's like you have to go on behalf of like a team of a dozen 207 - > other consultants who are like, "Yeah, we're all asking for a 208 - > little bit more," and everything rolls up, and all of a sudden 209 - > the client's like,"Wait, what?

210 - > John Tyreman: I've definitely experienced 211 - > Mark Wainwright: yeah. 212 - > So it's, so, so, so all of that, that's, that's what happens, 213 - > right? 214 - > So, um, that is the biggest challenge. 215 - > So 216 - > John Tyreman: I do wanna call out inflation being one.

217 - > And I kn- uh, and I know that it's, it's kind of a, a 218 - > footnote, but, you know, a dollar today only buys about 72 219 - > cents of what it did just 10 years ago 220 - > Mark Wainwright: particularly in these longer term relationships, 221 - > we will underestimate or underprice this sort of 222 - > inflation, right? 223 - > We will, we will under- So if we're involved with a client for 224 - > five years, 10 years, whatever else it is, that's a long-term 225 - > relationship, right?

226 - > maybe for the first five years of the relationship, we've 227 - > completely underestimated, maybe not even asked for an increase 228 - > or just underestimated this. 229 - > So now we're at a point where it's, there's a painful 230 - > situation where the delta is huge. 231 - > if we'd have actually just kind of gone back every single year 232 - > and sort of had that conversation, things would be 233 - > better. 234 - > But now there's a big gap, 235 - > John Tyreman: right, so let's navigate.

236 - > How do, how do we get through this? 237 - > Mark Wainwright: you and I deal on the, sales and marketing end 238 - > of things, John, so obviously we're hyper-focused on the front 239 - > end, like what's happening upfront, you know, upstream of 240 - > all this stuff, clearly we're gonna, you know, shine a light 241 - > on that. 242 - > We're gonna, we're gonna highlight that. 243 - > So just like with the original sale, we have to use great 244 - > discovery even while we're under contract, as we're developing 245 - > these new scopes, added scopes, expanded, you know, whatever 246 - > else.

247 - > Things are gonna lead to these, conversations where you need to 248 - > ask for more. 249 - > We need to use good discovery, and discovery involves 250 - > understanding what is most important to the client so that 251 - > we can then price those things. 252 - > And then we have to use great three-option proposals with, 253 - > this spectrum of recommendations when we go ask for more money. 254 - > We cannot default back to the same old behaviors, even if the 255 - > original contract was done well.

256 - > Good discovery, good understanding led to s- you 257 - > know, three-option proposals with great recommendations. 258 - > The client picked option B, you know, everybody was happy, but 259 - > now at some point in the future, we're needing to ask for more 260 - > 'cause things have changed, things have grown, whatever 261 - > else. 262 - > We can't default back to that, "Oh, I'm just gonna give them 263 - > one number and have them say yes." What happens when we give 264 - > them the one number and we're sort of, you know, un- you know, 265 - > we're in a relationship now, we're under contract, right?

266 - > If we give them one number, we - I mean, even to a, to a more 267 - > severe degree than previously, they feel like we're forcing 268 - > their hand because we're already under contract, that we've got 269 - > sort of one arm behind, we've got their arm twisted behind 270 - > their back, and we're the consultants and we're just gonna 271 - > come in and we're gonna work them over again with one number, 272 - > we're gonna push them, and they're, they don't have any 273 - > options.

274 - > Like we've already done whatever, 50% of the work 275 - > already. 276 - > We can't change now, and now they're asking for more. 277 - > So ugh, that just, that just erodes trust and just beats up 278 - > the relationship. 279 - > John Tyreman: I think you bring up a, a really good point about, 280 - > and I just wanna highlight this for our listeners, is that price 281 - > increases, expanding scopes, redefining that, setting those 282 - > expectations is, should be treated just like a new business 283 - > development opportunity, a new sales opportunity 284 - > Mark Wainwright: even before we have to go ask for more, if 285 - > we're doing these great three-option proposals ahead of 286 - > time, we're foreshadowing the future properly with our three 287 - > options, everything else, we will find ourselves in these 288 - > sticky situations less and less.

289 - > And then when, you know, the situation comes up where we have 290 - > to ask more, you know, we've got that information to, to, you 291 - > know, kind of fall back on. 292 - > We've talked about this in the past, is that if we do great 293 - > three-option proposals ahead of time, a lot of times our high 294 - > priced option, the third option, whatever you want to call it, 295 - > sometimes it's the first option, but the high priced all-in 296 - > option is the, is the tool that we use to foreshadow the future, 297 - > right?

298 - > So if we've ha- if, if we've put that in front of the client and 299 - > they opted for, you know, option B, but they looked at that high 300 - > priced option like,"Wow, there's no way we're gonna end up 301 - > spending that much," you have that tool that, that everybody 302 - > looked at together a year ago or whatever it was, and now you're 303 - > gonna sit down and review things and you're like,"You know what? 304 - > We picked option B, but we f- lo and behold, we found ourselves 305 - > wandering towards, you know, this, this high option."

So 306 - > we're there right now, right? 307 - > We're at this high option because we had these two or 308 - > three things that weren't gonna be incorporated into that high 309 - > priced option that you opted out of, you explicitly opted out of, 310 - > and now here we are, right? 311 - > John Tyreman: I, I wanna link this to specialization and 312 - > having a process, a delivery process, because if you have 313 - > past experience and you are specialized in a specific 314 - > industry or delivering a specific kind of result, then 315 - > you're in a better position to be able to anticipate what those 316 - > changes are or what those new levels are, what that option C 317 - > is.

318 - > So, there's another benefit of specialization and being 319 - > hyper-focused on a specific slice of the market 320 - > Mark Wainwright: No, it's great. 321 - > That's a good point to interject right there for sure. 322 - > You're super in tune with the work you do, the results your 323 - > clients get, and any deviation from that, you know, you're 324 - > immediately aware of, right? 325 - > Like,"Oh, we're headed off track here," right?

326 - > We're not - We're, we're, we're, we're veering to the left 327 - > slightly, so not, not 328 - > John Tyreman: Been there before, totally. 329 - > I wanted to add another kind of bullet point to how you can 330 - > navigate price increases, and one of them is to sell that 331 - > higher price offering to new opportunities. 332 - > So if you found yourself in a position where... 333 - > I'll speak to my own experience.

334 - > I priced my services a few years ago around me, myself being a 335 - > solo consultant. 336 - > But as the business has grown, as I've gathered more 337 - > experience, I've been able to realize that, you know, I need 338 - > to increase my prices. 339 - > One thing that I can do is replace old clients with new 340 - > ones at that higher price point. 341 - > Mark Wainwright: You're listening to breaking biz dev 342 - > John Tyreman: the podcast that beats up, breaks down, and 343 - > redefines business development for the professional services 344 - > firms of tomorrow.

345 - > Your hosts are John Tyerman, founder of Red Cedar Marketing, 346 - > the podcast marketing company for experts and professional 347 - > services firms, 348 - > Mark Wainwright: And Mark Wainwright, principal consultant 349 - > and founder of Wainwright Insight, the fractional sales 350 - > manager and sales consultant to professional services firms. 351 - > John Tyreman: If you find this podcast helpful, please help us 352 - > by following the show and leaving a review on Apple 353 - > podcasts 354 - > Mark Wainwright: and now back to the show.

355 - > let's get slightly more specific on this, and I want to kind of 356 - > talk through sort of a scenario, 357 - > John Tyreman: Are you gonna quiz me, Mark? 358 - > Mark Wainwright: Sure. 359 - > I'll cr- I'll quiz you a little bit, John. 360 - > All right.

361 - > So if we're gonna, if we're gonna give them some, give them 362 - > three options at this point, And just say we're gonna give them 363 - > like a low option, a high option, and then sort of a, a 364 - > middle option. 365 - > what would the low option be? 366 - > John Tyreman: I would look at that as redefining the scope of 367 - > work at a lower price point. 368 - > And I would...

369 - > It, it's a total lower dollar amount, but it's total, it's a 370 - > less l- less of value that they're receiving, but it's a 371 - > way to recalibrate the scope of work to something that's 372 - > manageable on the delivery end, but also satisfies the need for 373 - > a, you know, a lower price point on the client's end. 374 - > Mark Wainwright: Good. 375 - > A-plus for sure. 376 - > Gold stars.

377 - > So, so yeah, just to dig a layer deeper into that, and maybe this 378 - > example applies more to sort of a longer-term engagement where 379 - > we're just sort of walking alongside the organization and 380 - > we're, you know, whether it's a retainer or whether it's just 381 - > sort of a, consistent relationship we have So our low 382 - > option is we're gonna carve out a bunch of stuff that we were 383 - > doing before, pull out some scope, and then we're going to 384 - > reintroduce a lower price that doesn't include some stuff we 385 - > were doing before, and maybe some of that stuff was high 386 - > value and maybe it wasn't.

387 - > You know, maybe we were just spinning our wheels doing, you 388 - > know, a fewer, a, a, a handful of different things with this 389 - > client that really wasn't making much of an impact. 390 - > So maybe we can carve that out, refocus on something that is of 391 - > high value and high importance to them. 392 - > Lo and behold, we end up with a slightly lower, lower dollar 393 - > point here. 394 - > So in this scenario, there's our, there's our low option.

395 - > Now let's swing the pendulum to the other side. 396 - > What is the high option, 397 - > John Tyreman: yeah, and this is kind of what I was alluding to 398 - > earlier in, um, having that specialization and being able to 399 - > anticipate what the maturity of your clients looks like. 400 - > So I can speak to in, in my world of helping clients with 401 - > podcasts, I know that there's certain levels that can be 402 - > unlocked as the, a media brand grows. 403 - > So audience engagement becoming more and more like you need to 404 - > spend more time engaging with your audiences on the high end, 405 - > right?

406 - > Or you start to develop sponsorship opportunities that 407 - > take bandwidth to be able to manage. 408 - > So those are like a couple examples, and then so th- that's 409 - > what I would do is on that high end, let's take a look at what 410 - > mile markers are we hitting, what mile markers do we 411 - > anticipate hitting in the next six to 12 months, and then how 412 - > would the scope of work change if we hit those milestones? 413 - > Mark Wainwright: Got 414 - > John Tyreman: That's kind of how I would approach it.

415 - > Mark Wainwright: Yeah. 416 - > Good, I have a, a second alternative to that. 417 - > Like the - so, so, so the first option was this carve out, you 418 - > know, carve out a bunch of scope, offer up for a lower 419 - > dollar amount. 420 - > This high option when we swung to the o-other end, and maybe 421 - > this is a relationship, maybe it's a project-based, 422 - > may-may-maybe it's just a long-term, long-term 423 - > relationship, whatever else it is.

424 - > So from the get-go, we have, from the time we signed the 425 - > original contract, we have noticed that the client is, you 426 - > know, pushing the edge of the scope, right? 427 - > And things have kind of almost, you know, almost un- you know, 428 - > subconsciously sort of expanded with time, right? 429 - > So the high option at this point, now that we're at this 430 - > inflection point and we say, "Okay, we need to have a 431 - > conversation," the high option can be sort of a worst-case 432 - > scenario that says,"Look, over the last 12 months, the 433 - > trajectory of our work together has taken a, you know, a 434 - > completely different tack than, you know, what we originally 435 - > expected," right?

436 - > We're just, we're 10% over here, we're 20% over here. 437 - > We're just, like, it's just const- like the, the line is not 438 - > headed the way we all thought it would. 439 - > It's, you know, it's increased, and the line is steeper, right? 440 - > You're looking at our graph here.

441 - > Um, if this continues, here's where I see us kind of ending 442 - > up, right? 443 - > Here we are, year one. 444 - > Year two, if we continue along this path that we've been on 445 - > with things expanding, here's where we could, here's where we 446 - > could end up. 447 - > And lo and behold, that's a big number, And a lot of times you 448 - > won't.

449 - > A lot of, a lot of consultants will just freak out. 450 - > They're just like,"No way that I, I am gonna put that big 451 - > number in front of these guys because they're just gonna freak 452 - > out," right? 453 - > No way. 454 - > But that's our high option, Okay, John, here's where you 455 - > bring it all home, right?

456 - > So, we've given them the low option where we carved out just 457 - > this little chunk of scope, lower dollar thing. 458 - > The high option is like,"Look, we've had so many changes," 459 - > whatever else,"the tra- the, the, where we're headed is 460 - > really expensive." And then we come back to our wonderful 461 - > Goldilocks, our middle option, which is the thing that says, 462 - > "Look, if we both make better decisions, manage budgets, 463 - > manage schedules, everything else, all that stuff, here's 464 - > where I think we can be in this next 12 months."

And maybe it, 465 - > may-maybe, you know, it's an increase, but it's reasonable, 466 - > it's understandable For both parties. 467 - > And, that is a fantastic option, right? 468 - > It lets you control the price conversation that we talked 469 - > about in the past. 470 - > It lets you give them, offer up this low dollar amount thing, 471 - > but it's a pretty small scope.

472 - > It shows them worst case, and then you end up in the middle 473 - > John Tyreman: And it's, it's an exercise in the client 474 - > understanding the service provider and their, their 475 - > business model. 476 - > I think i- in the, the high option is really a, a tool in 477 - > this scenario to make sure that the client understands where the 478 - > boundaries are in the existing scope 479 - > Mark Wainwright: For sure, right? 480 - > This is, this is f- this is the, we talk about framing a lot when 481 - > we talk about, price and scope and everything else with these 482 - > three options.

483 - > Like, this is, this is your tool to frame the conversation, to 484 - > control the price conversation. 485 - > It's like this is the low end, but it's missing out on a bunch 486 - > of stuff. 487 - > This is the high end that basically says,"Look, if, if we 488 - > can't get our stuff together and continue to let things sort of 489 - > expand and grow, um, with no constraints, we're gonna end up 490 - > here," and then we snap back to the, to the middle option. 491 - > So that's where we're presenting the client the ability to choose 492 - > the three options.

493 - > We give them a really nice, attractive central option that 494 - > says with some discipline, with some good decision-making, 495 - > there's gonna be some increases, but it's not gonna be that, that 496 - > high end. 497 - > Nor do we have to sacrifice a whole bunch of things that maybe 498 - > you want in this low option, right? 499 - > So there you go. 500 - > All right.

501 - > That's one sort of, you know, low, high, medium sort of a 502 - > situation. 503 - > And frankly, I think that, that example that we just provided 504 - > there applies to a ton of different situations, because 505 - > inevitably we run across things in the work that we do as 506 - > consultants that are unexpected, and it drives increases in work, 507 - > increases of scope, and lo and behold, increases in the 508 - > dollars. 509 - > And when we frame it properly, here's the low thing we could 510 - > do, here's the high thing, really expensive, but there's a 511 - > nice middle.

512 - > I think that's a fantastic way to approach these, these 513 - > changes. 514 - > Okay. 515 - > So we have got some, just some, you know, bullet point here. 516 - > So now what?

517 - > What's everybody go and do now? 518 - > John Tyreman: the number one takeaway from me is looking at 519 - > your existing client portfolio and doing your, doing some 520 - > discovery, listening, learning, looking at each engagement and 521 - > thinking to yourself is, how far off a scope is this? 522 - > where did we see this relationship heading? 523 - > What's changed in terms of the value of the client when we 524 - > first started working together?

525 - > What do they value now? 526 - > What's changed? 527 - > and I think just going through that exercise of intentionally 528 - > doing a discovery exercise with the client, um, but 529 - > independently as well 530 - > Mark Wainwright: you know, just the foundational understanding 531 - > across the board that asking for money is, is, is undesirable for 532 - > everybody, right? 533 - > Client, consultant, the whole thing.

534 - > Nobody, nobody wants to get into that. 535 - > That's it. 536 - > Nobody wants to be asked for more. 537 - > Nobody wants to go and ask for more.

538 - > So it's just not, not good for, for anybody. 539 - > It's not good for the relationship. 540 - > The other big thing for me, like, you need to treat these 541 - > things exactly the same way as you did the original proposal, 542 - > provided you did a, you know, provided you did what we say you 543 - > need to do in the first proposal, right? 544 - > Do some options, do good discovery, present really strong 545 - > understanding, align your u- align the options you present 546 - > with the understanding that you developed through great 547 - > discovery.

548 - > That exact same thing needs to happen now. 549 - > And frankly, it's gonna be a little bit easier because now 550 - > you know them. 551 - > You've worked with them for a period of time. 552 - > You understand them more.

553 - > You understand how they like to work. 554 - > You understand what their, their pain points are. 555 - > You understand what they, the things they place a lot of value 556 - > and importance on, vice versa. 557 - > So now you're armed with a e- an even deeper understanding so 558 - > that you can come into these conversations really 559 - > well-equipped to present some really strong, strong options.

560 - > So we gotta treat this the exact same way first time around. 561 - > We gotta include those options. 562 - > And, you know, this is kind of whether this is worth being 563 - > explicit or not, John, it's like we gotta take this seriously, 564 - > right? 565 - > So many folks approach these sort of additional service 566 - > requests asking for more way too casually, I don't know if you 567 - > have or not 568 - > John Tyreman: No, it's anxiety filled, sweating bullets.

569 - > It's like, 570 - > Mark Wainwright: it's probably the opposite is like I have so 571 - > much stress up, you know, kind of in this thing as I just, I 572 - > just don't do it. 573 - > And sometimes that happens, right? 574 - > Is like we're so anxious about it, we never do it. 575 - > We just n- we, we need to ask, For sure.

576 - > And we don't wanna rationalize, we don't wanna get defensive or 577 - > emotional or whatever else. 578 - > It's, this is an, this is an opportunity to be emotionally 579 - > intelligent, to work through some recommendations and some 580 - > options. 581 - > frame these options appropriately so that when we 582 - > sign this next go-round, when we head off on, you know, part two, 583 - > then everybody's happy with the relationship and we've got good 584 - > trust, good working relationship, and we're frankly 585 - > even more focused on the results that the client wants to get out 586 - > of this.

587 - > So, John, we've, we've hammered this enough. 588 - > I would love for people to have, you know, a nice, rich 589 - > conversation online with us, whatever else, you know, about 590 - > this topic. 591 - > John Tyreman: Hit us up on LinkedIn and tell us how you've 592 - > navigated price increases with your clients along the way. 593 - > We'd love to hear, hear from you.

594 - > Mark Wainwright: Good.

Related episodes across the Index

Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.

  • How to Fix Stalled Deals (Without Pitch Slapping)Driving Growth: The Go-To-Market Podcast · on Discovery process85 / 100
  • 354 Andy Paul Sell without selling outHelping Sells Radio · on Discovery process82 / 100
  • The 5- Step Framework to Fast & Slow Social Strategy: Beth & Michael from Slice SocialBuilding Brand Advocacy · on Discovery process77 / 100
  • Inside the Mind of a Modern Sales Leader: AI, Forecasting, and Winning Deals - Scott Shillington - Advisor, Sales Excellence @ Pike Street CapitalElite Selling Podcast · on Discovery process70 / 100
  • When the Data Tells a Different Story Than the ManagerHR Voices · on Discovery process64 / 100
  • One Shift At A Time: Hockey Lessons For Go To Market with Matthew RubinGo to Market Coffee Talks · on Discovery process51 / 100

More from Breaking BizDev

All episodes →
  • The Perfect (Sales) Proposal70 / 100
  • Burnout in BizDev: Reignite Your Doer-Sellers74 / 100
  • The Right (and Wrong) Ways to Use AI in Business Development74 / 100
  • How to Maximize Un-Billable Hours (And Not Squander Them)58 / 100
  • Is Your Referral Process Broken?58 / 100
Explore the best B2B Sales podcasts →
All Breaking BizDev episodes →