Breaking Banks · 2026-05-22 · 55 min
In This Episode Kiah Haslett walked into our Hot Takes session at the Alloy Labs annual member meeting with a thesis she’d been sitting on, and it’s a good one: in a lighter-touch regulatory environment, the prisoner’s dilemma rewards whoever moves first. The strategically correct move, she argues, might also be the morally bankrupt one. And she’s not sure that changes the math. Dara Tarkowski - who sees the grand jury subpoenas before anyone else does - pushed back. Not on the logic, but on the premise. The statutes didn’t go anywhere. The switch can still be flipped. And underneath both arguments is the question we’d been wrestling with the day before: if most banks only have a debt mindset - protect the downside, don’t lose, get your principal back - what are they leaving on the table? And what does it actually cost them to keep waiting for clarity that isn’t coming? Joining Jason Henrichs are Kiah Haslett (Fintech Takes Banking), Dara Tarkowski (Much Shelist, P.C.), and Rick Geloff (Bank of North Dakota).
Human Consciousness in an AI-Driven World52 / 100The Evolving Digital EconomyWinning the Multi-Front War: AI-Powered Intelligence for Modern BankingEverybody’s Robot FightingInside the Next Chapter of Payments: Policy, Fintech and Innovation