The B2B Podcast Index
Index
All categories
MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
MethodologySubmit
Best of:MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
An independent project byFame
SearchBest episodesGuestsInsightsMethodologySubmit a podcast
Index/HR/Work in Progress
Work in Progress artwork

What “Future Fit Leadership” Looks Like In A 130-Year-Old Company - with Britt Bargfeldt from Stark Group

Work in Progress · 2026-06-08 · 54 min

0:00--:--

Key moments - from our scoring

Substance score

46 / 100

Five dimensions, 20 points each

Insight Density9 / 20
Originality7 / 20
Guest Caliber13 / 20
Specificity & Evidence9 / 20
Conversational Craft8 / 20

Stark Group is a century-old Nordic retailer and distributor of building materials that has undergone dramatic transformation under Britt Bargfeldt's leadership. Over nine years, she helped scale the company from 5,000 to 20,000 employees while expanding from the Nordics into Germany, Austria, the UK, and beyond. Rather than impose top-down culture, Bargfeldt architected a performance management model that treats behavioral integrity (encapsulated in their core value of "decency") as equal to financial KPIs. She created a Branch Manager Program that empowers local HR directors and business units to train managers around a clear leadership model, then tracks behavioral adoption through engagement surveys. Her unconventional path - from video game startups to organizational psychology - informed a pragmatic approach to M&A integration: when acquiring German and UK operations, Stark made swift decisions about management fit rather than seeking cultural blending. The distributed model keeps the group headquarters intentionally lean (35 people versus 260 previously), enabling speed and autonomy while maintaining cohesion through shared values and measurement systems.

Key takeaways

  • →Decency - treating behavioral integrity as non-negotiable to performance - became a central cultural pillar that Stark operationalized through performance management, engagement surveys, and consequences, not just rhetoric.
  • →Distributed leadership development, where local business units own manager training within a corporate framework, proved more scalable and contextual than centralized HR-driven programs across 20,000 employees in seven countries.
  • →When scaling via acquisition, rapid assessment and decisive action on management fit (sometimes removing underperforming leaders) proved faster and more effective than seeking cultural compromise between legacy and acquirer organizations.
  • →A lean group headquarters (35 people) paired with strong business unit autonomy and clear decision-making frameworks enabled Stark to move quickly despite 4x growth and geographic expansion.
  • →Behavioral expectations must be measured, monitored through employee feedback, and have real consequences to shift culture from aspirational values to lived practice in operational environments.

In this episode

  1. 1Introduction to Britt Bargfeldt and Stark Group
  2. 2Personal Background and Non-Traditional Career Path
  3. 3Educational Journey: From Chaos Pilot to Organizational Psychology
  4. 4Scaling Stark from 5,000 to 20,000 Employees
  5. 5Mergers and Acquisitions Strategy in Germany and UK
  6. 6Core Values and Decency-Based Leadership Model
  7. 7Branch Manager Program and Behavioral Measurement
  8. 8Decentralized Implementation and Local Autonomy

Mentioned

Stark GroupBritt BargfeldtPernille Hippe BrunD. HockVisaChaotic CommonsChaos Pilot School

Guests

Britt Bargfeldt

Topics in this episode

Organizational psychologyM&A integrationEngagement SurveysStark GroupBranch Manager ProgramDecency (core value)Performance management modelLeadership modelDistributed leadershipChaos Pilot School

Questions this episode answers

How did Stark manage culture integration when acquiring companies in Germany and the UK?

Rather than seeking cultural fit or blending approaches, Stark quickly assessed whether acquired companies' top management could drive the behaviors Stark expected. Based on experience in Germany, the company made faster, tougher decisions about management composition in the UK acquisition, integrating acquired businesses into Stark's values and leadership model rather than compromising between cultures.

How does Stark measure whether managers are actually living its core value of decency?

Stark uses a multi-layered measurement approach: a clear leadership model describing expected behaviors, engagement surveys asking employees if they see those behaviors, performance talks integrating behavioral thriving alongside financial KPIs, and consequences when leaders don't align with values - treating behavioral integrity as equal to business results.

Why does Stark keep its group headquarters so small (35 people) despite having 20,000 employees?

The lean headquarters enables speed and maintains autonomy within business units. HR directors in each country and business unit leaders own manager training within corporate frameworks, rather than centralizing all development at headquarters, which allows for faster decision-making and local context while maintaining alignment through shared values.

What is the Branch Manager Program and why did Stark prioritize training these roles?

The Branch Manager Program trains store and distribution center managers (who can lead units of 5 to 100 people) around clear behavioral expectations. Bargfeldt identified that branch managers have the biggest impact on value creation in Stark's operational model, so she designed the program framework but delegated delivery to local business units.

What is Britt Bargfeldt's background and how did it shape her approach to culture at Stark?

Bargfeldt studied at Chaos Pilot School and worked in video game startups and scale-ups before earning a master's in organizational psychology. Her startup experience, exposure to experimental organizational thinking (including D. Hock's Chaotic Commons), and pragmatic nature informed a culture-building approach that treats values as operationally measurable and accountability-driven, not just aspirational.

What our scoring noted

Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.

Insight Density

9 / 20

A handful of genuine operational details emerge - M&A top-management assessment process, the HQ headcount reduction from 260 to 35, and a succession-planning business case - but the episode is significantly diluted by personal-life filler in the opening and repeated generic statements about a changing world that add no operator value.

I made a business case showing how much does it actually cost us to replace a branch manager if we do not have a ready now successor? And how much does it cost us if we do have a successor ready? Uh and that's two very different prices.
we quickly also when we got the access to the company, went in and assessed the top management to see is this the right people to drive the change that we want to have in this organization.

Originality

7 / 20

The episode recycles well-worn HR frameworks - emotional intelligence, learning agility, 'one size doesn't fit all,' 'think global act local' (invoked verbatim by the host) - without introducing a genuinely contrarian or first-principles argument. The 'decency as business imperative' framing is slightly distinctive but not novel.

so we are all together, and then we have uh cohorts, which are smaller groups of 10 people
I'm also very aware of that one size doesn't fit all uh and there are different learning styles

Guest Caliber

13 / 20

Britt Bargfeldt is a genuine practitioner who has navigated real M&A integrations, sat on due-diligence teams, and managed HR through a 4x headcount scale-up - not a conference-circuit thought leader. The role is VP rather than CHRO and the company is a regional mid-market player, which limits the ceiling.

when we first acquired the German market, which was at that time doubling our size
I got this organizational chart, and I remember that at one of the consultings we had, someone from from their side of the team said, It's very it's a very lean organization... And I had no idea what it was I was looking at. I just didn't understand it.

Specificity & Evidence

9 / 20

Headcount milestones (5,000 to 20,000; HQ from 260 to 35 people), cohort sizes (10 people, 2 - 3 day offsites), and seven countries are concrete, but the episode never produces outcome data: no engagement score deltas, no retention improvements, no ROI from the Future Fit program despite those being directly relevant claims.

I think we were 200, oh there were 260, yeah, and then we downsized it to 35 people.
we have cohorts, which are smaller groups of 10 people that we uh that we place at a small island down south that we have access to, and they are staying there for two or three days together

Conversational Craft

8 / 20

The host asks reasonable structural questions about M&A process and program design but consistently rephrases vague answers approvingly rather than probing for evidence or pushing back on unsubstantiated claims about culture change and program effectiveness. The opening elevator anecdote and flattering close eat significant time.

So so it's it sounds like you you were thinking globally or think global, but acting locally and and uh living by that
So so it's learning agility, it's curiosity, it's staying open

Conversation analysis

Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.

Most-used words

different30organization24program23future19leadership19part18group17stark14first14world13culture12traditional12small12sounds11model11values11

Episode notes

Bad behavior is often tolerated in the name of “performance,” especially during fast growth. In this episode we sit down with Britt Bargfeldt, VP of Group Talent and HR Development at Stark Group, to challenge that trade-off and show what it looks like to scale results without sacrificing decency. Stark has in recent years grown from 5,000 to 20,000 employees across Northern Europe through major acquisitions, and Britt shares the practical people strategy choices that helped the organization keep moving and keep its standards. We get specific about how culture becomes measurable: a clear leadership model, engagement survey follow-up, performance talks that include how people thrive, and real consequences when leaders act against values. Britt explains why “decency” is not soft, it is a prerequisite for sustainable performance, retention, and credibility. We also unpack why Stark runs with a small group headquarters, what autonomy really means in practice, and which HR elements stay non-negotiable so data and expectations stay consistent across countries.

Full transcript

54 min

Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.

1 - > Speaker: Welcome to Work in Progress, a podcast featuring 2 - > thought leaders with interesting perspectives on HR and people 3 - > and culture. 4 - > My name is Pernille Hippe Brun, and in these talks we explore 5 - > the latest trends shaping the future of work. 6 - > Today I'm speaking with Britt Bargfeldt, VP of Group Talent 7 - > and HR Development at Stark Group, one of Northern Europe's 8 - > largest retailers and distributors of building 9 - > materials. 10 - > Britt has helped scale Stark from 5,000 to 20,000 employees, 11 - > three new markets, and helped organize and shape the 12 - > organizational structure and design along the way.

13 - > Britt has a deep background in global talent strategy and a 14 - > passion for making learning stick in a fast-paced and 15 - > operational environment. 16 - > Brit is commercially driven and people-oriented and has a 17 - > strong track record within HR, people, and culture. 18 - > So, Britt, we are at the Stark headquarters, the Stark Group 19 - > headquarters. 20 - > And when I arrived this morning to a headquarter, I rang the 21 - > bell and the door was open for me, and there was a man holding 22 - > the elevator for me, which in itself was quite, you know, 23 - > surprising because usually people just mind their own 24 - > business, and if if they are about to go on an elevator, 25 - > they'll hurry up and do whatever they need to do.

26 - > But he was actually holding the elevator for me, and we had a 27 - > little chit-chat. 28 - > Uh, and he uh took off at the second floor. 29 - > I went to the fourth floor, and there was another person 30 - > greeting me and waiting for me there, which in itself says 31 - > something about your company culture, I believe. 32 - > And you have the title of I'm the vice president of uh talent 33 - > and HR development.

34 - > Exactly. 35 - > Yes. 36 - > So I believe you might have something to do with that 37 - > culture, and that's uh one of the things I I'm very curious 38 - > about to dig further into today. 39 - > But why don't you start by introducing yourself?

40 - > Who who are you? 41 - > Um It's funny because it's something you ask people when 42 - > you are interviewing them for a position or something, and I'm 43 - > always a little bit uh struggling with should I say 44 - > something personal about myself or should I start with my resume 45 - > and what I've been doing in my career? 46 - > Yes. 47 - > Um the letter.

48 - > Oh, so you ask me whether you but I'm like okay, but it's 49 - > interesting you have that reflection. 50 - > Um on top of you know the question itself. 51 - > Um what would you prefer? 52 - > Um I think that well, I would I think I would actually just 53 - > prefer to say a little bit about myself first, because that may 54 - > say something about what I'm doing and why I'm doing it.

55 - > Yes. 56 - > Um well, first of all, actually, when I think about it 57 - > now, it's I'm a mother uh of two kids. 58 - > Uh I'm a world traveler. 59 - > I've been traveling a lot in my life, uh also by myself.

60 - > Um I'm a feminist, I'm a really good cook, I'm a passionate 61 - > knitter, painter. 62 - > Uh I have this whole creative side of my life that is not 63 - > really incorporated in the corporate world, but I try to 64 - > drag it in wherever I can. 65 - > Yes. 66 - > Um I'm very curious by nature, I would say.

67 - > I'm uh from a very young age, I started hiking. 68 - > Uh I haven't done that as much the last 20 years, actually, but 69 - > I have a house uh in this forest of Sweden where I spent 70 - > time and reflect. 71 - > Yes. 72 - > Uh so I love nature as well.

73 - > Yes. 74 - > Wow. 75 - > Yeah. 76 - > So and that says a lot about you.

77 - > So what made you want to start there? 78 - > Uh rather than the corporate resume education. 79 - > In some ways, uh I love being here at at Stark, and I actually 80 - > also like the corporate world. 81 - > But there are part of the corporate world where I cannot 82 - > really identify myself with.

83 - > Okay. 84 - > So I I start there to say that there's also another side of me 85 - > that I and I try to combine these two, and and uh and 86 - > sometimes it's easy and sometimes it hard it's hard, but 87 - > it's uh I I try to insist to uh to have these two sides of me 88 - > coexist in some way. 89 - > Yeah, co coexistence. 90 - > So co the coexistence of the two sides of you uh also shapes 91 - > the way you probably inhabit uh if we could say so, your your 92 - > position and the way you Yeah, I would I would say so.

93 - > I would say so that the one can really thrive without the 94 - > other. 95 - > No. 96 - > Um so yes, it's it's uh it's a thing that I think a lot about 97 - > also in my daily life. 98 - > How can I make room for both of these sides of me?

99 - > So I looked at your resume. 100 - > So uh and it also looks like you don't have the traditional 101 - > background leading up to inhabiting, if that's the word 102 - > we use, your position today. 103 - > Can you tell us a little bit more about your educational 104 - > background? 105 - > Yes.

106 - > Uh I'm I'm uh I've been part of the Chaos Pilot School, uh, 107 - > which is uh a professional bachelor. 108 - > Um and then after I I had been there or graduated, I started 109 - > out uh in a small startup that became a scale-up um in an IT 110 - > company where we made uh video games. 111 - > It was back in 2004, I think I started there, and then I was 112 - > there for six years. 113 - > Yes.

114 - > Um, but during my time there, I felt that I needed something 115 - > else. 116 - > I I was quite interested in scaling the things uh or or 117 - > scaling the organization. 118 - > So I ended up studying a master in organizational psychology as 119 - > well. 120 - > And then you started out your career, and you said you started 121 - > out with a small startup that became a scale-up, and you also 122 - > went to San Francisco, it looks like, uh, to join a project.

123 - > Was that part of school? 124 - > That was part of school. 125 - > Okay, that was the last year at the Chaos Pilot. 126 - > We um we had to find an internship for about six months.

127 - > Uh, it could be anywhere in the world. 128 - > We had to approach uh an organization where we would get 129 - > that six months and identify project and so on. 130 - > And uh and I had this idea that I've read about um an 131 - > organization and it was also uh an organization that has already 132 - > been in contact with the school uh early on. 133 - > So they knew a little bit about the chaos pilots, but it was 134 - > called the Chaotic Commons, and it was founded by a man called 135 - > D.

136 - > Hock, he was also uh part of uh the founders of the Visa uh 137 - > card. 138 - > And um and I really liked again that experimental way of 139 - > thinking about organizations. 140 - > So I I got an internship there. 141 - > Yes, yeah.

142 - > Oh, so it sounds like you started out in a way less 143 - > corporate setting, much more like startups and innovation, 144 - > and also the way Visa was organized was quite different, 145 - > right? 146 - > Yeah, and and so now you find yourself in an organization 147 - > that's more traditional, would you say so? 148 - > Or how would you describe Stark? 149 - > It is uh it it is more traditional.

150 - > It's it's um actually it's it's an interesting organization 151 - > because it's 130 years old, but it doesn't feel like that 152 - > always, because uh it's there's been going a lot on for these 153 - > 130 years, but the last eight years uh where I've been here, 154 - > eight, nine years, it's been uh we've been growing a lot, uh and 155 - > we've been um driving the company in a different way, I 156 - > would say, than we've we did before, where we have an 157 - > operating model where we have a quite small group headquarter, 158 - > uh, and then we have headquarters in each each of our 159 - > business units that we work closely with, where it was uh a 160 - > much bigger headquarter 10 years ago.

161 - > I think we were 200, oh there were 260, yeah, and then we 162 - > downsized it to 35 people. 163 - > So when you joined, you were around 5,000 people in Stark? 164 - > Yes, yes, all located in the Nordics, yes, all in the 165 - > Nordics, yeah, and now you are around 20,000 and distributed 166 - > across Northern Europe, Northern Europe, so eight, uh, ten 167 - > different countries, and we have seven, seven different 168 - > countries. 169 - > Seven different countries, and not only the Nordics, but also 170 - > Germany, Austria, the UK.

171 - > We have a store in Greenland, as Greenland as well. 172 - > Yes, yeah, and so so that journey from growing from 5,000 173 - > to more than 20,000 in in less than nine, 10 years, uh, that 174 - > sounds like a lot. 175 - > Yes. 176 - > So that scaling, how how have you how have you managed that as 177 - > a company?

178 - > And also from seen from your uh side of the business where you 179 - > take care of people, of course. 180 - > I think that it's uh I think in the beginning what really came 181 - > in handy was that we were a quite small team here at the 182 - > group headquarters, so and it's very uh transparent. 183 - > You can see that our offices here, it's all glass, it's uh we 184 - > work very close together. 185 - > Uh so it's also quite effective.

186 - > And um so one part is that that uh we can move quite quickly, 187 - > even though we are quite a big organization. 188 - > Um, so when we first acquired the German market, which was at 189 - > that time doubling our size, um it all went on quite quickly. 190 - > Yes. 191 - > And uh so so um and I would say that one of the things that uh 192 - > that came in handy for me as a person is my very pragmatic way 193 - > of doing things, um but but also that uh we had a small team 194 - > that uh that worked very closely together on from it from day to 195 - > day.

196 - > And then we quickly also when we got the access to the 197 - > company, went in and assessed the top management to see is 198 - > this the right people to drive the change that we want to have 199 - > in this organization. 200 - > Should we change any of them? 201 - > Should we place them otherwise elsewhere in the organization 202 - > and so on? 203 - > So so I would say that that was more a structured way of doing 204 - > things that I've actually done before.

205 - > Um and then over a period of time, it's been it's actually 206 - > been quite uh interesting to see how that has evolved uh or not 207 - > evolved. 208 - > So so on top of that, after we got the German business, we 209 - > acquired uh a whole business in the UK, which was even a bigger 210 - > market. 211 - > And based on the experience we had in Germany, we actually were 212 - > a lot quicker in making some really tough decisions uh on how 213 - > the management team should work or how that how they um what 214 - > people should be in that management team.

215 - > So so that was uh based on the experience, we just adapted the 216 - > way that we went into that market. 217 - > That's very interesting. 218 - > So when you you speak about mergers and acquisitions and and 219 - > did did you say you acquired them or how how did you vocalize 220 - > it? 221 - > What kind of language did you use?

222 - > We ack we acquired both because we integrated them into to 223 - > Stark. 224 - > To Stark, yeah, and your values, your set of values and 225 - > ways of thinking. 226 - > So it was not so much like finding a culture fit that would 227 - > kind of blend the two different cultures, but more like we 228 - > actually know what we want and what we think about management 229 - > and leadership. 230 - > And what was that?

231 - > What kind of values and what were you looking for when you 232 - > looked at that top management to see if there was a good fit and 233 - > match? 234 - > That's a good question because we actually worked a lot on 235 - > that. 236 - > Uh, because one of the core beliefs we have here in in Stark 237 - > and in Stark HR is that you cannot make a really sustainable 238 - > uh performance if you do not do it in a in a good way. 239 - > So you have to have the the right behaviors with you as 240 - > well.

241 - > You have to be decent in the way that you operate. 242 - > One of our core values is decency. 243 - > Um so what I I in in in plain English, I would say you cannot 244 - > create good results if you if you act like an asshole, 245 - > honestly. 246 - > Uh and when I say that to people out in our business and I 247 - > say it like that, they understand it.

248 - > They're like, yeah, of course. 249 - > But that wasn't a given when we when we started working with 250 - > the culture. 251 - > Um so so we have we made actually a performance 252 - > management model where um an integrated part of that, a huge 253 - > part of that, was how do we measure people's behavior? 254 - > Yes.

255 - > Uh, and how as a as a parameter uh that is just right to the 256 - > performance of the financial uh KPIs we have, the strategic KPIs 257 - > and so on. 258 - > Yeah, and how do you measure people's behavior? 259 - > How we measure we have a very um we have a very clear 260 - > leadership model that describes what kind of behavior is it that 261 - > we expect from our leaders. 262 - > Yes.

263 - > Uh we also have all engagement surveys, for example. 264 - > Uh we have uh we have uh performance talks where we an 265 - > integrated part of that is also about how people are thriving 266 - > and so on. 267 - > So I believe most companies at our size have that, but uh but 268 - > what we do is uh we make sure we have good follow-up processes 269 - > and and we make sure that there is also um a consequence if we 270 - > experience that people are not behaving uh according to our 271 - > values.

272 - > And so do you do you have to train the managers or the 273 - > leaders to so so it's not, I assume, it's not only HR's 274 - > responsibility to take those conversations. 275 - > Absolutely not. 276 - > Okay, so how how do you organize that? 277 - > That would be impossible.

278 - > Um what we started out doing uh seven years ago was that we 279 - > designed a program for what we call branch managers. 280 - > So we have all these stores out there, which is uh a branch for 281 - > us. 282 - > They also have like a distribution center around it, 283 - > some of them. 284 - > Um and so and some of them can be actually small businesses uh 285 - > in our business.

286 - > So it can be a branch can be up to a hundred people, that's the 287 - > biggest branches, but they can also be four or five people. 288 - > So it's really a wide range of uh of different uh types of 289 - > units that you have to manage. 290 - > But what is common with them was that we saw that the branch 291 - > manager has the biggest impact on the value that we can create. 292 - > So I designed a branch manager program uh that we together 293 - > actually with our uh HR directors out in the countries, 294 - > and then we sent that out and said to all our business units, 295 - > it's your responsibility to to within these frames that we did 296 - > here and within the behaviors that we described here to train 297 - > your managers to live up to this.

298 - > Yes. 299 - > And then we follow up on that by um by actually monitoring uh 300 - > in our engagement surveys that people can are asked Do you see 301 - > this? 302 - > Do you see these behaviors? 303 - > Yeah, smart.

304 - > Why did you choose to let the local HR professionals uh and 305 - > the local managers uh implement the program rather than having 306 - > like everyone fly in and do it from the corporate headquarters, 307 - > or what was the thought? 308 - > It's because in our DNA here at Stark, it's it's very important 309 - > that there are some autonomy out there, uh, which is also 310 - > something that I personally believe is the best way to do 311 - > things. 312 - > Um I've been part of other businesses where we did the the 313 - > other way around, and I can see that even though we, for 314 - > example, say we are very alike in in the Nordics, we are very 315 - > different when it comes to leadership.

316 - > And I can see very small things can make a huge impact. 317 - > So that's also why I have this strong belief that if if we can 318 - > define something that makes sense for everyone, we can find 319 - > a common ground and then they can implement it in a way that 320 - > actually makes sense for them and their leaders and their 321 - > markets and the results that they need to create, it creates 322 - > the biggest uh impact. 323 - > Awesome. 324 - > So so it's it sounds like you you were thinking globally or 325 - > think global, but acting locally and and uh living by that, but 326 - > also uh not negotiating whether those behaviors were the right 327 - > ones or not.

328 - > You you kind of said this is the behavior we expect, but how 329 - > you train for it and live it is also culturally defined. 330 - > Yes, I would say so. 331 - > Yes. 332 - > Uh because it can it can actually have a very different 333 - > uh look and appearance when when it comes to the local market.

334 - > Yes. 335 - > Uh and you can make many mistakes if you think that you 336 - > can just do one size fits all when it comes to this. 337 - > Um so when I when I defined the leadership model, I actually 338 - > did it in collaboration with the countries we had at that time. 339 - > Yes.

340 - > Um and when we had to implement these things in the newly 341 - > required businesses, uh, it hasn't been without uh 342 - > discussions, but it's been, I I would say it's been fruitful 343 - > discussions in a way that they understand what is it that we 344 - > actually want to achieve. 345 - > And sometimes I have had also to back down because they have 346 - > explained to me if you want this, we need to do it this way 347 - > instead. 348 - > Or this will not fly here because it sounds, it sounds 349 - > wrong.

350 - > Uh so I also have sometimes to just put my beliefs or my way of 351 - > thinking uh somewhere aside because it it it doesn't really 352 - > uh fly. 353 - > Wow. 354 - > So so there the the chaotic way of looking at life and how it's 355 - > all uh dependent on on the people involved but also the 356 - > cultures involved, and the context. 357 - > And the context requires quite a span, right?

358 - > Of of letting different realities live at the same time, 359 - > it sounds like. 360 - > And so how do you then make sure that uh a behavior, a 361 - > wanted behavior, is lived on the floor? 362 - > You have engagement service, of course, but but uh how do you 363 - > other than that keep track of whether people actually do that 364 - > or not? 365 - > Live those values and behaviors?

366 - > That's that's a really good question. 367 - > Um I I first of all I have to say I'm not I'm not myself 368 - > monitoring that. 369 - > Uh the business unit is monitoring that, and then they 370 - > sometimes report back to me uh what they experience. 371 - > But I would say that one of the things that we have uh 372 - > succeeded in incorporating in our uh local HR communities and 373 - > our our leadership, uh the way we we practice leadership is 374 - > actually that we are in this together.

375 - > So I think that there is also a sense of if people see 376 - > something that is not in line with that, they actually act on 377 - > it or speak up, or you know, so I think that there is also a 378 - > system where uh I think people realize that it's quite a great 379 - > culture to have when when we succeed, and they're protecting 380 - > that. 381 - > So it becomes a system where we need to protect it. 382 - > It's self-protecting because we need to protect this in order 383 - > to be able to have a a place where we where we actually want 384 - > to be.

385 - > Yes. 386 - > One of the interesting things that we start looking at now is 387 - > actually how do we then create a uh an organization that is more 388 - > inviting for younger generations because we can see 389 - > that our our age span is is uh much above uh above 45 uh uh out 390 - > in the business. 391 - > And um and it's not always that they understand what it is that 392 - > young people want. 393 - > Uh so that's uh we haven't got a solution for that.

394 - > Is that a uh uh something they've said to you, or is that 395 - > something you have sent? 396 - > I can see it in when we look at how many people are we getting 397 - > in as apprentices, uh, and for how long do they stay after they 398 - > have finished their apprentice or their internship? 399 - > It's not that long. 400 - > Okay.

401 - > And it's and there are many different reasons for that, I 402 - > think. 403 - > Uh there are some structural reasons, there are some 404 - > behavioral reasons, there are some leadership or leadership 405 - > gaps, I would say, that they need to understand also how do 406 - > we lead these young people. 407 - > Yes. 408 - > So uh so that's I don't have to.

409 - > So you look at the Data and then uh ha have any of the local 410 - > branch managers brought it up as something they also see as a 411 - > challenge? 412 - > Uh not that I know of, but I think that that's more because 413 - > they are so focused on their sales. 414 - > So they're like, oh, whoever works here, let's just uh move 415 - > on. 416 - > Yeah, so they're not so occupied with do we have the 417 - > workforce of tomorrow or so?

418 - > No, to in the future. 419 - > No, exactly. 420 - > But if we are not starting to have that lens now, I think we 421 - > will have a problem at some time. 422 - > I guess not only in Stark, but actually in the whole business, 423 - > all the whole uh yeah, yes.

424 - > Okay, interesting. 425 - > Yeah, and this this maybe leads us to what actually brought my 426 - > attention to you in the first place, which is a program you've 427 - > um spearheaded. 428 - > I I is that too much to say that you spearheaded it, uh, 429 - > called Future Fit. 430 - > Yeah.

431 - > Um, and that sparked my curiosity because that's first 432 - > of all, it it has this futuristic look and what is it 433 - > actually we need, what's coming. 434 - > But also um forward thinking. 435 - > And and then you mentioned in the video talking about that 436 - > program that emotional intelligence was a big part of 437 - > that. 438 - > Yes.

439 - > So talk us through what does this program consist of? 440 - > What what what made you think of this program in the first 441 - > place? 442 - > And then I would also really love to hear a little bit about 443 - > how did you manage to to sell it to those who should actually 444 - > accept it in the in the first place. 445 - > Um that was many questions.

446 - > Yes, that many maybe just you let's start with it. 447 - > What is what is future fit? 448 - > Future fit is our leadership program for our group people, 449 - > yes. 450 - > So people that worked here at group first of all.

451 - > Yes. 452 - > Uh, I hope in the future that we can also expand it to the 453 - > senior leadership teams that we have in our business units. 454 - > Yes. 455 - > But I actually think that before we could do that, uh, I 456 - > think we should take our own medicine uh and make sure that 457 - > whatever we send out there is actually something that would be 458 - > good enough that we would take it ourselves.

459 - > Yes, uh, or do it ourselves. 460 - > So um so it's a leadership program where we actually try to 461 - > close the gap between having been uh an organization that 462 - > needed to lead 5,000 people, and now we are an organization that 463 - > needs to leave lead 20,000 people uh in a world that looks 464 - > a little bit different. 465 - > That looks a little bit different and which is ever 466 - > changing. 467 - > You would say that probably also 10 years ago, but it's just 468 - > even uh at a bigger scale now, I would say, right?

469 - > Um, and it's also different markets. 470 - > So I think one of the things that uh I did to sell it in to 471 - > the the XCOM was to keep talking about that I was really afraid 472 - > of um that we had a huge risk if we did not try to close the gap 473 - > between how do we how do we lead today and how do we need to 474 - > lead in the future. 475 - > I'm sorry. 476 - > Um and I and the people that uh that is here at Group, uh I've 477 - > honestly never been at a place where uh they are so good at 478 - > what they're doing.

479 - > Uh it's really great people we have here. 480 - > But I also think that they're all people that weren't hadn't 481 - > really been part of such a big organization or such a big 482 - > transition before. 483 - > No. 484 - > So trying to talk about how that could be a risk, and we 485 - > could actually fail in that if we just closed our eyes to it 486 - > that got their attention in the end and said, okay, we can see 487 - > that this is actually an uh there's something we don't know.

488 - > There's something we don't know. 489 - > Let's let's see how we how we close that gap or become better. 490 - > Yes. 491 - > Well, that that speaks to your culture because I I believe that 492 - > you know many top management groups you call it ex XCOM.

493 - > Yeah. 494 - > Um it's it's also a sign of maturity that you admit, oh 495 - > yeah, we didn't try this before. 496 - > Maybe we can learn something, maybe there's something we don't 497 - > know, maybe we can do it better. 498 - > So so which of your values does that speak to?

499 - > Is that uh actually both to decency and passion, I would 500 - > say. 501 - > Yeah, because there's also passion in it or ambition or 502 - > whatever you would call it. 503 - > Yeah. 504 - > So your values are decency, passion, and pride.

505 - > And pride. 506 - > So that there's something about okay, let's do it as best as we 507 - > can. 508 - > Yeah, exactly. 509 - > So you spoke to those values, it sounds like.

510 - > Yeah. 511 - > I never thought about it that way, but yeah. 512 - > Yeah, but you kind of did, right? 513 - > Yeah, it is maybe maybe that's what you did.

514 - > But but that's that's just interesting how you know, how do 515 - > you as HR, sometimes our roles is to convince other people that 516 - > it's worth the investment or we should spend time on this. 517 - > And how do we actually do that? 518 - > I agree. 519 - > I agree.

520 - > And I think that uh one of the things that's really important 521 - > for me, I think we talked a little bit about it when we 522 - > first spoke on the phone. 523 - > You said something about HR, and I'm like, I'm not really 524 - > defining myself purely as HR. 525 - > Uh, I know I'm I have a a title that's within the HR range. 526 - > I'm I'm out of the HR part of the business.

527 - > But for me, it it has always been trying to combine the 528 - > business and HR activities. 529 - > So, what is it the business calls for? 530 - > How can we create something valuable to to to answer that in 531 - > HR? 532 - > Yeah.

533 - > Um and you not only spoke to the values in this instance, 534 - > this also sounds like you you presented some data, something 535 - > where you could look at this as a real life problem that we 536 - > might encounter, do we not do something? 537 - > Absolutely. 538 - > Yes, absolutely. 539 - > I and I I try to do that with everything I do in my field of 540 - > work.

541 - > So, for example, when I had to convince the organization uh 542 - > about succession planning, first they were like, we don't need 543 - > succession planning because we've never done that. 544 - > And it's and and I had to make a business case. 545 - > So I made a business case showing how much does it 546 - > actually cost us to replace a branch manager if we do not have 547 - > a ready now successor? 548 - > And how much does it cost us if we do have a successor ready?

549 - > Uh and that's two very different prices. 550 - > And then I also created uh a business case on how much does 551 - > it cost us if we have a branch manager that is not really 552 - > performing, but we keep him there because we say, Oh, we 553 - > cannot really find anyone else in the market. 554 - > That's also comes with a price tag. 555 - > Yes.

556 - > And when you do these business cases, people tend to listen 557 - > when you are in a P backed. 558 - > Yeah, it's almost uh risk management, right? 559 - > Yes. 560 - > Yeah.

561 - > So then you got the the green light or whatever we have to 562 - > call it. 563 - > What does the program consist of? 564 - > What the future fit program. 565 - > The future fit program.

566 - > Well, it's a program with many different kinds of activities, I 567 - > would say, because I'm also very aware of that one size 568 - > doesn't fit all uh and there are different learning styles. 569 - > Um so we both have uh activities where we have 570 - > lectures or professors or people we fly in that have uh talks uh 571 - > about very important things, uh, where we are all together, 572 - > and then we have uh cohorts, which are smaller groups of 10 573 - > people that we uh that we place at a small island down south 574 - > that we have access to, and they are staying there for two or 575 - > three days together and work collectively on a theme, but 576 - > also on their own personal development.

577 - > Uh, then we have one-to-one coaching, and we have uh given 578 - > them the opportunity to have mentorships with other people in 579 - > our organization, so we are not closing around ourselves here 580 - > at group, but we're also reaching out to the business so 581 - > they can uh decide if they want to have a mentor, which is out 582 - > in the business, or they want to have uh a small internship 583 - > where they come out and explore uh a field or an area that 584 - > they're interested in.

585 - > So it's not a closed loop, it's an open loop. 586 - > It's an open loop, and it's um I would say I did all these 587 - > different activities on purpose because I know that some of them 588 - > have gained in most out of the mentorship or the internship, or 589 - > some of them has gained most out of uh being in the small 590 - > cohorts. 591 - > Uh, and I think it's important to be able to adapt to different 592 - > realities, which is also actually what the whole program 593 - > is about.

594 - > Yeah. 595 - > So one of the themes that we have been talking a lot about is 596 - > what I would say is called cross-cultural leadership, um, 597 - > and understanding other people and how they behave and how they 598 - > can react to you. 599 - > So that's one part, but it's also for me about understanding 600 - > yourself and what your reactions uh say about you and what 601 - > impact it has on the team that you're leading or the people you 602 - > have to work with.

603 - > Um so for me it's it's also very much about uh looking at 604 - > yourself. 605 - > Yes, looking at uh my strength, absolutely. 606 - > I know you have written a book about that, uh, but it's also to 607 - > be aware of the blind spots uh and the things that people may 608 - > find a little bit difficult about you, but you might not be 609 - > aware yourself. 610 - > Um but I try to design a program where there is room for 611 - > you to identify that, look at that, get feedback on how can we 612 - > how can how can you move on for that, how can you find a 613 - > different way of approaching things.

614 - > Yeah. 615 - > And and why is it that is important in the world we live 616 - > in today? 617 - > And and you spoke about younger generations before, and maybe 618 - > they need or require or want something different when it 619 - > comes to management and leadership and so 620 - > self-reflection that seems and looking at yourself and being 621 - > able to do something about your weaknesses. 622 - > Where where does that come from?

623 - > I think it comes from that the world is changing rapidly, and 624 - > if you don't know how you change with the world, then it's just 625 - > status quo and you will be sitting there and you will not 626 - > follow that change. 627 - > So I think it's something about how do we keep up with 628 - > everything that goes on around us and not lose the momentum and 629 - > not lose our own development uh path and not stay still in some 630 - > way. 631 - > Yeah. 632 - > I think that's some of the most important things for me that 633 - > that you actually dare to also look at what you're doing now 634 - > might not be the right thing to do tomorrow, uh, and not be 635 - > freaked out about I'm not sure how I'm going to solve this task 636 - > because the world has changed and now it looks different.

637 - > And the world is changing in many different ways. 638 - > You can see the AI, the all the wars that's going on and uh the 639 - > economy, how it changes changes and so on. 640 - > So it's um I think that if if we do not help people try to 641 - > investigate to get that mindset, uh we will get something in the 642 - > future that is not what the future calls for. 643 - > No.

644 - > So so it's learning agility, it's curiosity, it's staying 645 - > open. 646 - > Um dare to look at what's hard, not avoiding talking about the 647 - > hard things. 648 - > Yes. 649 - > Uh so that's also something that uh is very important to me 650 - > in in my life and work.

651 - > Uh both of them actually, that we that we um make sure that we 652 - > first of all have fun and stay curious while we do the things 653 - > we do, because otherwise it just becomes a performance machine, 654 - > and it's I don't think that anyone thrives in that. 655 - > Um and that's also back to the sustainable performance because 656 - > performance is just that's how a PE-backed environment works. 657 - > But you can do that in many different ways, I believe. 658 - > So the Future Fit program, the themes are uh intercultural 659 - > understanding and awareness, and then it's emotional 660 - > intelligence, then it's uh emotional intelligence, it's uh 661 - > change management.

662 - > Uh we have uh we have built it around our leadership model as 663 - > well. 664 - > So it's also about understanding our business uh 665 - > and what that calls for. 666 - > Yeah. 667 - > Um, but it's also I would say it's also a program that uh when 668 - > I designed it, uh I had this idea, of course, it should be 669 - > built around our leadership model.

670 - > Uh and it should also um it should also work with uh how we 671 - > run our business, so we should address our operating model. 672 - > But I I deliberately did not say that we have uh we have 673 - > these sessions, these seven sessions or five sessions, I 674 - > think it was, uh, and all of these sessions contains these 675 - > themes. 676 - > I had an idea, but when it when we were halfway, I actually 677 - > changed some of the content that we had in the end because I 678 - > could see that what we had experienced up to here called 679 - > for something else.

680 - > So it's ever-changing. 681 - > It is ever changing, and I think it create I'm I mean I 682 - > think again the open mindset, you need to you need to listen 683 - > to the world around you to be able to do that. 684 - > So one of the things that uh that I hadn't thought about when 685 - > I sat down in the first place to design the program, that was 686 - > actually how you build trust and the whole trust issue, and not 687 - > just trust with your peers, but also trust upwards and trust in 688 - > different nationalities because it can look different.

689 - > And uh and the more that I could see that people 690 - > participated in the program, I was like, we need to have 691 - > something about trust in this program, yeah, and leading 692 - > upwards as well. 693 - > For me, it's about holding the space and being curious about 694 - > what infolds here, what is it that they call for, uh, and then 695 - > try to design that for them. 696 - > And and then how how is it even possible to replicate it? 697 - > Um and scale it.

698 - > I think it actually is because there are some ground uh ground 699 - > rules that we have. 700 - > For example, as I said before, we have the the operating model 701 - > that we need to address, we have the leadership model that we 702 - > have designed the whole thing around, uh, we have the values 703 - > that we would never compromise on. 704 - > Um, and we have we have the idea of um what kind of behavior 705 - > is it that the leadership model calls for. 706 - > So in that way, it's the same, but it can change a little bit 707 - > when a new group comes in.

708 - > Yeah. 709 - > I would say if if we did this in one of our business units, it 710 - > would probably change a little bit. 711 - > Yes. 712 - > Uh and they would probably, if I know them well enough, call 713 - > for something that is about how do we sell more?

714 - > Which I wouldn't give them because as I said, I usually say 715 - > to them leadership uh is not about selling things, it's it's 716 - > it's actually about leading people to do to sell things if 717 - > you want them to do that. 718 - > But yes, you need to uh so it is kind of like sales, but in a 719 - > different way than they maybe anticipate. 720 - > I don't know how to phrase this, but there's something 721 - > about the fact that you are a 130-year-old company living in 722 - > the reality of the here and now and preparing yourself for the 723 - > future.

724 - > And we talked about whether you are a traditional company or 725 - > not, and and where where would you put yourself on that 726 - > narrative? 727 - > Would would you say that Stark is a traditional old-fashioned 728 - > hierarchical driven company? 729 - > Well, it's it's a very broad question because it depends on 730 - > how you look at the organization. 731 - > So, in some ways, I would say yes, we are very we are a very 732 - > traditional uh old company that works in that way.

733 - > In some ways. 734 - > And and what does but in what in what way? 735 - > Um what makes it traditional? 736 - > First of all, we have uh a lot of workers that have been with 737 - > us for a very long time.

738 - > So they have a whole career here, um, which is also why I 739 - > think that we need to look at how do we get a new generation 740 - > in and and start working or building a pipeline with with 741 - > these new talents. 742 - > Um but I would say in other ways, we actually we're we are 743 - > trying to look at the company and pieces of the company where 744 - > we take uh, for example, one department and say, how do we 745 - > make organizational design that actually fits what they're 746 - > doing, what we're going to achieve in our um strategy, and 747 - > that would also be fit for the future.

748 - > Yeah. 749 - > So so uh we've just done that with our IT department. 750 - > Uh we've we're doing it with our um German business unit uh 751 - > at the moment for the whole sales organization, which is the 752 - > biggest part of the organization. 753 - > We've done it in uh we've done it in the UK from the moment 754 - > that we acquired them because when we entered there, we could 755 - > see that it was they I I remember because I was part of 756 - > the due diligence team where we when when we were in the in the 757 - > phase of of looking at them.

758 - > And um and I got this organizational chart, and I 759 - > remember that at one of the consultings we had, someone from 760 - > from their side of the team said, It's very it's a very lean 761 - > organization, it's very structured, it's it's really 762 - > well plug and play. 763 - > It's plug and play and it's well designed. 764 - > And I had no idea what it was I was looking at. 765 - > I just didn't understand it.

766 - > Okay. 767 - > And I was like, all these layers, and what are this guy 768 - > doing? 769 - > And or what is what are these roles there for, and so on. 770 - > So and I and and in the end, it just turned out that they had 771 - > double layers, and I also experienced that I had I had uh 772 - > conversations with um with one of the consultants that were on 773 - > the team that were selling, saying, Oh, but uh, when I was 774 - > asking, for example, where does business development sit?

775 - > And he was he says, That depends, and I was like, depends 776 - > on what? 777 - > And then it just turned out that they they could have a role 778 - > that were placed three different uh places in in the 779 - > organization, and they didn't know each other, these three 780 - > different people, and they were doing more or less the same 781 - > thing. 782 - > So what we did there was quite rapidly we we redesigned the 783 - > whole organization and took out some layers and streamlined it 784 - > even more.

785 - > And that sounds horrible when I say it now, but it was actually 786 - > to also make it more clear for people and the job that they 787 - > were doing. 788 - > Um and and we didn't always just got rid of people, we tried 789 - > to replace some of them as well to to just make it more clear 790 - > what is your roles, uh role and responsibility um in this new 791 - > setup. 792 - > So so part of what you are actually doing is is also 793 - > looking at the organizational design and is it fit for the 794 - > here and now, but also for the future?

795 - > Yes. 796 - > And that might from the outside look like you're just 797 - > streamlining everything and making it uh clear and visible 798 - > and uh logical uh also. 799 - > Sometimes it is like that. 800 - > And that may still be traditional, but that works, 801 - > yes, and that gives that clarity.

802 - > I would say it yes, it it uh sounds traditional and in some 803 - > ways it is traditional. 804 - > Uh but I but I also would say that the way we do it is that we 805 - > take the the strategy that we have defined and say, is this 806 - > department organized in a way so they can actually deliver on 807 - > this? 808 - > Yes. 809 - > And a lot of the times the answer is no.

810 - > And then you do and then you do something, yeah. 811 - > Yes. 812 - > How often do you do that? 813 - > Um that depends.

814 - > It's I I mean, it's often huge project projects. 815 - > So uh and it's it's uh even though that we are involved from 816 - > here, it's uh it's organized out in the countries, so they 817 - > have to they have to implement the solution in the end. 818 - > Yeah. 819 - > So okay.

820 - > I think this is so interesting because there's something about 821 - > you being um able to change with the circumstances at hand, 822 - > yeah. 823 - > And that doesn't to me sound traditional. 824 - > No, it sounds like you are adaptive, yeah. 825 - > But that's also why I'm saying it's it's it's a mix in this 826 - > organization because I would say if you go out into one of our 827 - > stores, it's still very traditional, and and the people 828 - > there are very uh they work more or less the same way, but I can 829 - > but there has been a cultural shift.

830 - > So one little thing, and that's just a minor thing, but it also 831 - > says something about the business we are in. 832 - > When I entered, I I remember it was still quite common that 833 - > down in the the lunch room they would have uh calendars with 834 - > naked girls, which is just like a a thing that they do in this 835 - > business. 836 - > And uh and we have uh Uh we have a CEO in Denmark that's 837 - > female, and she was like, I'm just going to forbid this.

838 - > And she got rid of them. 839 - > I can't say if they still something some they are still, 840 - > but I I think that they are gone. 841 - > It was a signal. 842 - > But it's a signal.

843 - > And it's a little piece of showing what kind of culture is 844 - > it that we want here. 845 - > Yeah. 846 - > Yeah. 847 - > And then a debate around why is it that she has that request?

848 - > Yeah. 849 - > Yeah. 850 - > And also the way that you we talk to each other, because we 851 - > are serving customers that can have a rough language, but that 852 - > doesn't necessarily mean that we are going to have a rough 853 - > language. 854 - > And how do you how do you react if you experience uh a customer 855 - > having a rough language towards one of your colleagues?

856 - > Do you just stand there and look at it, or do you actually 857 - > interfere and help that colleague that might be standing 858 - > there and has just freezed because it's a it's it's an 859 - > unpleasant situation? 860 - > Exactly. 861 - > Yeah. 862 - > So that's also something that we that we are working with.

863 - > How do you differ from your competitors? 864 - > Uh I I think uh or I know that we differ a lot by having the 865 - > operating model that we have. 866 - > So having a very small tight group uh office uh headquarter 867 - > is not how they operate the other uh our competitors. 868 - > No.

869 - > Um so so we we really try to have as much autonomy out in our 870 - > business units so they can drive their business the best 871 - > way for their market. 872 - > Yes. 873 - > Uh for example, here at Group, we do not have any uh we do not 874 - > have any sales, uh group salespeople, we do not have any 875 - > uh commercial people, we do not have any logistic people. 876 - > Um that's all out in the business unit, and it's uh it's 877 - > organized in a way that fits their market the best way.

878 - > Yeah. 879 - > How are you organized in HR? 880 - > Um but it's more or less the same as in um in the rest of our 881 - > company. 882 - > We have uh a small HR department here at group, um, 883 - > and then we have HR departments out in the in the businesses.

884 - > So at group we have uh we have the area that I run, which is 885 - > all the development things that are related to HR. 886 - > Then we have an operational uh department, and then we have uh 887 - > a rewards department. 888 - > So it's uh so that's the three areas we have here. 889 - > Uh and we are very much aligned with what's going on out in the 890 - > businesses, and and we have we work closely with with all our 891 - > um stakeholders out there.

892 - > How do you position yourself? 893 - > Is that okay to ask you uh towards we can always to watch 894 - > your colleagues? 895 - > Is it is it like this is my peer, or this is my stakeholder, 896 - > or this is someone I need to serve, or is this someone I need 897 - > to tell something? 898 - > Or that there's many there are many different ways you can meet 899 - > people.

900 - > I like that question actually because it's uh it's it also 901 - > says something about our culture. 902 - > Exactly. 903 - > Um I think I see them as someone I have to co-create 904 - > things with. 905 - > Yeah.

906 - > So they are my colleagues. 907 - > And and how does that differ from meeting them maybe as 908 - > someone you need to tell something? 909 - > Or well, I try not to tell people a lot. 910 - > Like you have to do this.

911 - > I try to make things that are so great so they want it. 912 - > Uh that's also the narrative we have at group uh HR. 913 - > So there are very few things from our perspective that we say 914 - > you must do this. 915 - > I think there is only a handful.

916 - > One of them is that we need to have the same way we do 917 - > engagement surveys so we can compare. 918 - > Uh we need to have the same HR uh system so we have data the 919 - > same way. 920 - > That's a non-negotiable. 921 - > That's a non-negotiable.

922 - > Yeah. 923 - > We need to they need to follow what we agree on group level, 924 - > but I but that's co-created with them. 925 - > Yeah. 926 - > The way that we um make the leadership program for our 927 - > branch managers, for example.

928 - > So um, so there are things where of course it's not 929 - > negotiable, but it's it's very few things that is like that. 930 - > We have the same code of conduct training, but that's 931 - > about it. 932 - > Oh wow. 933 - > Yes.

934 - > Great. 935 - > So I think we're nearing the end. 936 - > Um, is there anything I haven't asked you yet that you would 937 - > like to add or something that you think is is interesting for 938 - > people to hear about when it comes to no, I I don't know. 939 - > I think uh what I was thinking about in preparation for this 940 - > meeting was that what's important for me is of course 941 - > the why are we doing things, but it's also the how.

942 - > And I think that uh having these things going hand in hand 943 - > with we need to create results, but we need to do it in a 944 - > sustainable way, is what is actually core of the way that I 945 - > want to work uh in an organization. 946 - > And why is that important? 947 - > Because why does it have to be sustainable? 948 - > Because if if uh it's back to where we started about if if we 949 - > are not uh decent in the way that we we are with other 950 - > people, uh they don't want to work with us.

951 - > They find somewhere else to do. 952 - > It's as simple as that. 953 - > And I think that if we lose our spark, we also lose I would say 954 - > the possibility to create something great. 955 - > Uh so we need to keep that sparkle.

956 - > And I don't believe, and that's a belief I would say, that 957 - > people are are only driven by creating results for an 958 - > organization. 959 - > They're also driving about they are also driven by having a 960 - > great place to work. 961 - > Um they are driven about being in an environment where we 962 - > actually create each other or or treat each other in a great 963 - > way. 964 - > Yeah.

965 - > And and where they can bring their personality to work. 966 - > Absolutely. 967 - > Yeah, and their passion. 968 - > And their passion.

969 - > Yes, your value system. 970 - > Yeah. 971 - > Great addition to what we've been talking about. 972 - > Yeah.

973 - > Yeah. 974 - > So I think you also in your questions asked me about uh what 975 - > inspires me. 976 - > Yes, and also how you keep yourself future fit. 977 - > Oh, that's that was the question.

978 - > Something we haven't touched upon yet. 979 - > Okay. 980 - > Uh how I create myself or how how I stay future fit. 981 - > I think that uh I try, of course, I intend uh conferences 982 - > for HR people sometimes, but that's not the most important 983 - > things to stay ahead of my game, I would say.

984 - > It's really to listen to other perspectives than the ones that 985 - > I come from. 986 - > So, for example, I just started to be a mentor for students at 987 - > ITU that has great ideas. 988 - > So I'm a startup uh mentor for those, for some of those people. 989 - > Um so one thing is that they are young and they come with 990 - > fresh perspective.

991 - > I actually think that's a a very good thing as well, that 992 - > team up with someone that's not your own age, older, younger. 993 - > I have a really great friend who is 82, and uh and I have uh 994 - > actually one of the one of the people that I also find great uh 995 - > inspiration in is is my student assistant that comes from CBS. 996 - > I mean he has great perspective on many, many things. 997 - > Um but it's also to be aware of what actually creates peace for 998 - > me, because peace for me is clarity in my work and my 999 - > decisions.

1000 - > Uh so that's everything from making sure I spend enough time 1001 - > with my kids, making sure I have enough time off. 1002 - > Uh I spend time in nature, I knit all those things. 1003 - > So I I nurture my creative side because otherwise it's uh it 1004 - > becomes blurry for me somehow. 1005 - > And so that's inspiration for me as well.

1006 - > Wow. 1007 - > I love that answer. 1008 - > That's because it's it's unusual. 1009 - > So very often people say, Well, I take this course or I I go to 1010 - > whatever, you know, summer school or within our fields, 1011 - > within the same area of line of learning, which is inspirational 1012 - > to some.

1013 - > But you you touch on something very basic, also very human 1014 - > basics that many of us perhaps forget on a day-to-day basis. 1015 - > Yeah that we need to be grounded and in touch and slow 1016 - > down. 1017 - > That's actually if I can give people a little part of that in 1018 - > the future fit program as well. 1019 - > I I think I've I've done a lot.

1020 - > Because I think that they can they tend to forget as well. 1021 - > Yeah. 1022 - > Or people tend to forget. 1023 - > We do, yeah.

1024 - > Right. 1025 - > But maybe this is just the most beautiful way to end this. 1026 - > And it's been such a pleasure speaking with you about both 1027 - > your career and what brought you here and how you organized 1028 - > yourself, but also learning about the Future Fit program. 1029 - > Thank you so much, Britt.

1030 - > Thank you. 1031 - > You've been listening to the Work in Progress podcast on 1032 - > people and culture. 1033 - > If you enjoyed this episode, please feel free to share on 1034 - > social media. 1035 - > For more resources on people, culture, and working in a modern 1036 - > world, please visit get session.

com and check out our 1037 - > articles, guides, webinars, and more. 1038 - > Thanks for listening.

Related episodes across the Index

Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.

  • Episode: 197 - Fireside Chat: How Michael Mahoney Built a Culture of Disciplined Innovation at Boston ScientificMedtech Talk · on M&A integration88 / 100
  • 6 M&As Later: What this CPO has Learned (Nichole Viviani, Chief People, Culture & Change Officer at Global Payments)The Modern People Leader: Forward-Thinking HR · on M&A integration80 / 100
  • A Conversation With Richard Kopelman, CEO of AprioThe Failure Gap · on M&A integration79 / 100
  • Revisiting: Wall Street to SaaS CFO with Carla Cooper (CFO @ Contentful)The Growth-Minded CFO · on M&A integration78 / 100
  • [S2E13] Ali Payne: When HR and Finance Can't Agree, Employees LoseCLEARly Beneficial Podcast · on Engagement Surveys77 / 100
  • Tend Your Team Like a GardenHR Voices · on Engagement Surveys76 / 100

More from Work in Progress

All episodes →
  • Why Human Success Beats Traditional HR and How AI Shapes The World of Work - with Nina Carøe from Zensai78 / 100
  • Why Treating Sustainability As “Nice To Have” Puts Your Business At Risk81 / 100
  • Fra klassiske karriereveje til styrkebaseret hverdags-læring: Sådan vendte en styrelse udvikling på hovedet69 / 100
  • Hybrid Intelligence and how Human-Centered AI Is The Competitive Edge Of Your Organization - with Jacob Sherson81 / 100
  • Mangfoldighed, Miljø og Motivation: Socialt ansvar og Partnerskaber i Praksis - med Berit Eschricht fra Dansk Retursystem80 / 100
Explore the best B2B HR podcasts →
All Work in Progress episodes →