
The Stretch · 2026-06-24 · 19 min
Key moments - from our scoring
Substance score
56 / 100
Five dimensions, 20 points each
Jason Desens brings three decades of automotive and process optimization experience to Toshiba's HR leadership, where he's positioning the function at the center of the company's AI transformation. Rather than treating artificial intelligence as purely a technology problem, Desens argues HR must champion AI adoption while maintaining ethical guardrails and human oversight - particularly in sensitive areas like payroll and compliance. Toshiba's approach centers on democratizing AI capability: creating low-code AI agents to automate routine employee inquiries (payroll, attendance), launching Toshiba University to upskill workers on AI fundamentals, and fostering psychological safety for experimentation. The conversation surfaces a critical disconnect: while only 50% of organizations are formally rolling out AI in benefits and L&D programs, over 90% of employees are already using language models daily in their work. Desens reframes job displacement anxiety (FOBO - fear of being obsolete) through historical precedent: automation in automotive created new roles rather than eliminating work entirely. His vision for HR in the next five to 10 years emphasizes democratized AI coaching (moving beyond executive privilege), reimagined healthcare delivery through personalized plan matching, and breaking organizational silos through shared AI literacy.
Toshiba uses AI agents built by HR team members to automate routine employee questions (payroll inquiries via 'Payroll Princess', attendance via 'Time Tamer'), freeing HR professionals to shift toward advisory roles while maintaining human oversight on sensitive decisions like major payroll changes.
Most utilization focuses on basic tasks like email rather than advanced capabilities; Desens compares this to buying a Ferrari but driving 20 mph. Organizations need structured upskilling programs (like Toshiba University) to teach employees AI fundamentals and enterprise applications.
Desens frames it as FOBO (fear of being obsolete) and points to historical precedent: the auto industry's transition from horses to vehicles and later automation created new job categories rather than eliminating workers entirely. The key is helping employees reskill and reposition within the organization.
Only 50% of organizations formally deploy AI in HR programs like benefits or L&D, yet surveys show over 90% of employees use language models daily in their work. Organizations must bridge this gap by enabling and training employees rather than centralizing AI deployment.
Desens predicts AI coaching will shift from executive privilege to all employees, better AI-driven health plan matching based on individual budgets and needs, and a revolutionary shift in how healthcare delivery is fundamentally designed beyond traditional paradigms.
Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.
The episode contains moderate insight density with some actionable concepts (AI agents, Toshiba University, FOBO, planned abandonment) interspersed with substantial filler. However, many insights are repackaged conventional wisdom (AI adoption fears, digital transformation, generational differences). The speaker touches on specific initiatives like 'Payroll Princess' and 'Time Tamer' but doesn't drill into how they work or their measurable impact, padding the runtime with car anecdotes and repeated themes.
We launched Toshiba University last year with our learning model and we have, we're getting people AI ready. What does that mean? Means we're teaching them the basics.
It's like buying a Ferrari. Uh, and then you get the automatic, but you, you know, you just go real slow, like 20 miles an hour versus getting the six speed Ferrari.
The guest reframes familiar AI adoption talking points (human-centered AI, upskilling, FOBO as historical pattern) without strong contrarian angles or fresh frameworks. The comparison of AI adoption to automotive industry disruption is intuitive but well-trodden. The 'planned abandonment' Peter Drucker reference is borrowed wisdom. Few genuinely novel or counterintuitive claims emerge; most ideas circulate widely in HR tech discourse.
I think HR people will fizzle out. And you're going to find those that rise.
AI is going to change things a little bit. Right. It's. Rather than being afraid, I like to approach it with, okay, what can I learn from it?
Jason Desens is CHRO at a Fortune 500 conglomerate with over 150 years of history and operations across multiple industries, giving him material credibility on organizational change at scale. He brings automotive/Lean Six Sigma background and hands-on experience with AI pilot programs. However, he is primarily a practitioner discussing his own work rather than someone with exceptional expertise or track record in the specific AI/benefits space central to the episode's framing.
I didn't know the depth until I got the job.
So I approach things from a process perspective. And workflows and waste. Right. Looking for waste, looking for efficiency improvements, which then leads to roi.
The episode lacks concrete metrics, timelines, and data. Toshiba University is mentioned but with no enrollment numbers, completion rates, or business impact. AI agents (Payroll Princess, Time Tamer) are named but not quantified - no adoption rates, time savings, or ROI provided. Claims about generational attention spans (eight seconds for Gen Z) lack citation. Broad statements about health innovation and AI coaching are unsupported by numbers, case studies, or named examples beyond the host company's vague references.
We added a bunch of benefits, and some we realize really not that great. So we're gonna pull them back and then we're gonna add others.
the average attention span of Gen Z is eight seconds. It's ridiculous.
The host asks reasonable opening questions and attempts to steer toward specifics (benefits, health, employee engagement), but rarely presses for depth or challenges claims. Follow-ups are frequently derailed by tangential car anecdotes (Ferrari, Viper, Lambo, Huracan) that consume valuable airtime without advancing substance. The host nods along with broad statements about AI and transformation without requesting concrete examples, timelines, or pushback on optimistic claims. A few good transitions (FOBO, transformation, crystal ball) but inconsistent rigor.
Well, I think one of the beauty of whether it's the commercial application of these emerging language models or the enterprise facing opportunity. I do think there's an opportunity to span generations as well. Right.
So tell, tell me about what you've done. And again, we're sitting at Transform, so. So what an apropos transition.
Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.
On this episode of The Stretch, host Kevin Fyock sits down with Jason Desentz, Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO) at Toshiba, to explore what it really takes for HR to lead in the age of artificial intelligence. Toshiba is a household name with a 150 year legacy of world-first innovations - including the very first laptop - and Jason shares how the company is now applying that mindset of groundbreaking innovation across everything from electronics to power and industrial systems. Together, Kevin and Jason unpack the spectrum of curious versus cautious when it comes to AI, and why HR leaders should be the primary champions and stewards of enterprise AI rather than treating it as a pure IT project. They tackle FOBO (fear of being obsolete), drawing parallels from the Model T assembly line to modern automation and how new technology consistently creates new categories of human work.
Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.
Speaker A: Welcome to the Stretch. This is a podcast where we explore the ideas that are reshaping health and benefits and challenge the way we think about what's possible this season. We're coming to you live from the floor of Transform in Las Vegas, where some of the boldest minds in human resources, technology, and employee experience are coming together to think about how we can push the industry forward. My name is Kevin Fayock, and I'm the host of the Stretch and Let's Get Into It. So on today's episode, we're gonna cover three main topics. We're gonna touch on the idea of authentic vulnerability and artificial intelligence.
Speaker B: Honestly, how much tolerance you have for change?
Speaker A: We, believe it or not, are gonna touch on cars and skincare, which are more connected than you think.
Speaker B: It's like buying a Ferrari. Uh, and then you get the automatic, but you, you know, you just go real slow, like 20 miles an hour.
Speaker A: And then we're gonna talk about Toshiba and how it brings over a century of legacy to its cutting edge artificial intelligence.
Speaker B: Our whole base, one word is innovation. We were born from someone who was an inventor.
Speaker A: Today I'm really excited to be joined here by Jason Desens, who is Chro at Toshiba. Jason, thank you so much for joining.
Speaker B: Yeah, thanks for having me.
Speaker A: Toshiba is a household name. Most people know, uh, what you do and how you do it, but maybe not the depth of what Toshiba is.
Speaker B: I didn't know the depth until I got the job.
Speaker A: Yeah, well, why don't you, for the benefit of our listeners, tell us a little bit more about Toshiba. You and I, before we sat down, had an opportunity to talk about how diversified you are. So, uh, indulge us. Tell us about that.
Speaker B: Yeah, so Shiba really started off as, I mean, our whole base, one word is innovation. We were born from someone who was an inventor who created and encouraged people to bring anything that you wanted to turn mechanical. This is 150 years ago, into something that he could build for you. And he did it. So just keeping that in the theme. Toshiba then started branching out and actually working. We're very similar from a US Company to Japanese company perspective, like General Electric, where we're diversified in multiple industries. Where I always like to say we're industry agnostic. We'll try anything if we can innovate it or reiterate it, because not always you're innovating things, you're sometimes making it better. And Toshiba does a really good job. But we're in Everything from oil and gas to quantum to, uh, cyber, um, you know, all kinds of software stuff we're in. But obviously, people mostly notice for consumer products. Y. So the TVs, the. The laptops. By the way, Toshiba was the very first laptop, if you didn't know. And. Really? Very. Yep. Really. Uh, I've actually seen it in Japan, and I. I actually touched it. It probably shouldn't have, but I did.
Speaker A: Is it behind a locking?
Speaker B: No, no. They got this. Really? They. They're like. They're known for, like, world first, so, like, in the museum, they have world first if it's something they created. Oh, that's so cool. Like, yeah, so they're very innovative, and we have this. One of our core values is create together. So we love to create with others and trying to inspire others to innovate more, but we're in so many different, diverse industries. It is interesting. And in Houston, where I'm at, we have four different factories, including automotive, where we do stuff for hybrid, electric, which I didn't tell you. We do stuff for Ford Motor Company. We build in so many different ways that, uh, we're always trying to think for the future.
Speaker A: Yeah. Well, okay, so maybe this is an obvious and maybe a softball question, but you're the chro, and you think about innovation. Like, how do you lead with innovation in your role?
Speaker B: So in my role, I always want people. We've gone, I think, in society from curious to cautious. So I want us to go back to that curious. So I'm encouraging. And I kind of always have done this with my teams is, I'll get them in a room. And I'm like, all right, here's what we got in front of us. Who has ideas on, we can do this better? And usually it's crickets, because Owen's like, I don't know who this guy is. I mean, is he really asking? Does he really want our opinion? But once you start to get the flow, and then I create new projects, we have. When I first got here, I did a full audit of all the HR processes, and I said, okay, I want to understand what can we do better? What are we out of compliance with? First off, we got to fix things. Uh, more importantly, how can we move towards a digital, um, transformation? Right. Everyone says that.
Speaker A: Yeah.
Speaker B: But we really are doing it and creating AI agents to try to play around with it. And I'm also giving my team room to play. And then I'm encouraging others by inspiring and showing them what we're doing so they can do it with their departments. Yeah.
Speaker A: So when we think about artificial intelligence, it had to come up. Right. I'm sure we'll spend some time talking
Speaker B: about learning how to spell AI still.
Speaker A: That's right. It's really difficult.
Speaker B: Yeah.
Speaker A: Uh, so the spectrum of curious to cautious, where. Where do you sort of sit? When we think about the emerging language model space, do you think the advent of every LLM out there has that made us more curious or more cautious? Because I could potentially see both, especially with how I use it in my role, how I use it with my kids. But, um, what do you think?
Speaker B: It's no different than when you. When you change stuff. Like when the Internet first came out. Remember the old joke? Uh, yeah. It's on the Internet. Must be true. Yeah. Right. I mean, I think there's a little skepticism no matter what we do, but that's okay. That's where compliance comes in. Right. We got it. We got to put up. I don't like to use the word guardrails because I think innovation can get stifled when there's too many. So I really think you just have to be a stewards of whatever you're putting in place and making sure you're compliant and you're still, you know, you're always having on the back of your. But it's not stopping you from moving forward. It's not stopping you from trying something new. But making sure, like the risk. You always got to make sure. You're talking about the risk and the effect it could have on the business.
Speaker A: Yeah. And I've always said, especially in my role, focusing on innovation and doing so much work in the AI space, you know, the human has to be at the center. And maybe by an extension of that, HR needs to be at the center. Right. Like, when I think about Aon and what we've done, the tools we've built, how we've scaled different solutions within our organization, outside of it, our chief people officer and our HR segment has been at the center of that. So I imagine you're doing a lot of the same things at Toshiba.
Speaker B: Yeah. I firmly believe that HR should be, or, excuse me, AI should be led with hr. We've done that in the past with other things, even when the computer came online. I mean, yeah, I was an IT tool, but they didn't go to IT to say, hey, how do I restructure my org? Let's change my job description. Now they're going to hr, so this shouldn't be any different. But I'm finding more and More HR people are just afraid to raise their hand and say, I'll be the leader, I'll be the champion. Um, for some reason there's this skepticism because they're like, well, that's it. That's not us. And I completely disagree with that. Um, and I think you'll find HR people will fizzle out.
Speaker A: Yeah.
Speaker B: And you're going to find those that rise.
Speaker A: You know, we've done a lot of surveying with our clients, uh, around AI and where they think the opportunities to adopt it within the sort of HR space. You know, what is prevalent, what is. Maybe they're a little more cautious with things like performance management, compensation. I feel like there's more readiness to say, let's lean in there. But, you know, I sit in our health, business health continues to be an area, and benefits at large continue to be an area where I think there's a lot of cautiousness, of course. And I'd love to see employers maybe be a little more bold, of course, having the right compliance framework in place. But when I think about HR sitting in the middle, particularly in the way we can engage people in their health, there's a huge opportunity there and so much white space.
Speaker B: Well, we, again, are, uh, the stewards for these types of things. And any benefit program I bring in place, there's always an element of I'm testing the waters to see its value. Right. So it's always about whatever I'm implementing. What's the value that the employees are getting from it? Right. So from time to time, we're still looking and asking. We're not trying to be paternalistic. We're asking our employees, you know, do you find value in this? And we've added a bunch of benefits, and some we realize really not that great. So we're gonna pull them back and then we're gonna add others. But the point is, is I think we need to start changing things to be more, um. I talk a lot about, um, generational differences, and there's even more. So the gaps these days. I mean, just thinking of training and development, I mean, the average attention span of Gen Z is eight seconds. It's ridiculous. Like, I'm like, say what eight seconds? I can barely get a sentence out in that. But the challenge is, is how do I capture them? Because they're the growing population. When you got the folks at the other end of the population retiring at a faster rate, even more so than ever, um, we got to speed things up.
Speaker A: Yeah. Well, I think one of the beauty of whether it's the commercial application of these emerging language models or the enterprise facing opportunity. I do think there's an opportunity to span generations as well. Right.
Speaker B: 100%. I think the way in which you do it is super important. But we don't think about it in those contexts. We're always about like, here's for everybody, here's how we're gonna. What we should be doing, in my opinion is breaking it up and saying here's how typically the value is. Here, here's typically the value. But we still love to hear from you. Are we wrong? I mean, I think for them there's so much study out there. It's interesting. But I uh, want to give back enough what people find valuable to them to want to stay in. And it's not just retention in the reality. It's just I want to make a better workplace. Because the reality of it is we spend more time at work sometimes than we do at home.
Speaker A: We do, that's right. I think what I find particularly fascinating. And then we can move off the AI topic because I think we could just talk about this for an hour.
Speaker B: Jason.
Speaker A: Uh, is when we talk to our clients, about 50% of them are very much leaning into the language model space. We want to roll it out for this benefit program or this L and D program or this compensation program. Um, so 50%. But then when we survey employees and we say, how are you using it in your day to day role? Like 90 plus percent of them are like, I'm using it every single day. And so there's this disconnect between what we're doing at the organizational level and then how employees are using it. And so like how do we bridge that gap between the two?
Speaker B: Well, even work co pilot shop. So we, we, um, so we, we did a utilization and most of the utilization is for email. And it's sad because we spend millions of dollars on a product that we're not fully using its capability. It's like buying a Ferrari. Uh, and then you get the automatic, but you, you know, you just go real slow, like 20 miles an hour versus getting the six speed Ferrari. And then you're like really crushing it because you know how to use it. I like to use the full six speed, to be honest with you. But we gotta, we gotta teach people.
Speaker A: Yeah.
Speaker B: So that's why Toshiba, we launched Toshiba University last year with our learning model and we have, we're getting people AI ready. What does that mean? Means we're teaching them the basics. What is AI? It's everywhere but no one really sits down and tells you the different learning models, the different, uh, enterprise applications of it. We're gonna get into that.
Speaker A: Yeah. Well, we're on the floor of Transform here, but maybe next time we do a podcast, let's do it in a driver's seat and passenger seat of a Ferrari. And not at 20 miles an hour. Maybe at 200 miles an hour.
Speaker B: We can either do a Ferrari. I got somebody that owns a Lambo with a Huracan. We can do that too.
Speaker A: I'm, you know, listen, I, I'm good with all of those options.
Speaker B: Vipers. I used to work for Chrysler. I have a few.
Speaker A: Oh, nice. Yeah, I, uh, I grew up loving Vipers, so.
Speaker B: Oh, I love the Viper. You can nerd out Connor. Assembly. That's where it was built.
Speaker A: Yeah. Very cool.
Speaker B: Yeah.
Speaker A: So, um, you know, we've talked about AI and we've hinted at workforce transformation. So tell, tell me about what you've done. And again, we're sitting at Transform, so. So what an apropos transition.
Speaker B: Sure.
Speaker A: Um, what's your experience been in workforce transformation and what does that look like in the past couple years?
Speaker B: So I've always approached it being in the, uh, coming up in the autos and Lean Six Sigma. I'm a process guy. Right. So I approach things from a process perspective. And workflows and waste. Right. Looking for waste, looking for efficiency improvements, which then leads to roi, which then leads to productive, uh, productivity improvements. So my approach is always starting with that and then leveraging digital transformation to try to mitigate the low hanging fruit. Right. So then that way, because we need to go from, uh, we need to be more advisors. So our roles are going to change to be more advisors and then it allow us to create new things. I think we're stifled sometimes because the mundane business as usual stuff. Yeah, that. I mean, uh, we did these AI agents with my teams and we had fun with it and played around with it and we came up with all, uh, Right, let's f. Let's figure out how to find ways that employees can, uh, go to rather than going to you specifically. Specifically, can they go to an AI agent and get the questions answered? Let's just get that stuff out of the way. So we have, we're coming up with payroll princess for uh, we have an agent for that that has all your payroll questions. We got Time Tamer that answers your attendance questions. And. And now I had the payroll people create that. Yeah. And they're like, wow, I created an agent. Like, yeah, we showed them how to do it.
Speaker A: Yeah.
Speaker B: So. But we got a long way to go. But it's a start, right? We're playing. I think we got to give more room for play.
Speaker A: Yeah, I, well pay Payroll princess is quite playful, so I like it.
Speaker B: It wasn't my idea. The team came up with it. I said, great, now you gotta get a logo. And they're like, oh, what? I'm like, go ask AI.
Speaker A: Oh, that's great. So, uh, I think you used the term before fobo, if I remember correctly. Right. So fear of being obsolete. We all know. Yeah, fear of being obsolete. We know fomo. Uh, but fear of being obsolete. So this has been the topic du jour across every industry. Right. My parents are talking about this and you know, friends of mine who have kids in college, like AI job elimination. What does that look like? So tell me about your thoughts on. On fobo or fear of being obsolete.
Speaker B: Yeah, you know, it's context because this is not new.
Speaker A: Yeah.
Speaker B: Automotive. Put the horse out of business. Yeah, sorry.
Speaker A: Yeah.
Speaker B: So AI is going to change things a little bit. Right. It's. Rather than being afraid, I like to approach it with, okay, what can I learn from it? And then how do I get past it? Or how do I improve my skillset to the. That way I'm going to be a valued asset to the organization. So it's all about perspective and context. Your parents, you just mentioned, they're around when automation came out.
Speaker A: That's right.
Speaker B: We don't have robots building everything in factories. We have a lot of robotics, we have a lot of machines. But we also created new jobs. We have people that fix those machines. We have people that train on those machines. I think you're going to see new jobs that haven't even been created yet. I think the way in which we work will just shift again, but it's not going to replace the human worker. I mean, because at the end of the day, even AI needs human interaction and intervention at certain ethical times. I'll use payroll as an example. Right. You need. When you're going to make major payroll changes, you want a human to finalize and check off on that. You don't want to be all automated,
Speaker A: you know, and it's an optimistic view. So I know that you're a Motor City guy and we have, we share similarities and love of cars. It sounds like I was just talking to a friend about this. When we think about, like when the Model T came out and Henry Ford perfected the assembly line. Yeah. It like what an amazing way we saw the car being built.
Speaker B: And.
Speaker A: Yes. Did it put the horse and buggy out of business? To an extent it did. Uh, but I think we're seeing this, this new form of revolution. And I, like you, am quite optimistic about what it'll do for the worker. It's just going to require us to be maybe a little more nimble than we've had to be past 20 years.
Speaker B: And I think speed is going to be different this time around because AI is so fast. Again, your. Your org chart. We were talking about it before we got on, uh, that, that slide about. Not org chart. Excuse me, the slide about timeline. Timeline. It's. It's scary when you really think about it. You're like, wow, that's fast.
Speaker A: It is fast. It is fast. But, you know, I, you know, when Alan Turing coined the term artificial intelligence, for the most part back in the early 50s, uh, I wasn't working at Aon at that point. Uh, not yet.
Speaker B: But I want your skincare product at the.
Speaker A: That's. It's amazing. Yeah, it's a reverse aging. But when we think about sort of. Yes, it hasn't been that long, but as far as our careers, it actually has been a long time. Right.
Speaker B: Yeah.
Speaker A: I feel like the topic is not a new topic at all. And the way it's morphed from the idea to, you know, these machines beating people at chess to helping, uh, it to support radiologists. I mean, I'm excited for the next five, 10 years and what it's going to do for our industry and what's going to do for our roles.
Speaker B: Well, I think health is a good example. My younger son had a heart transplant at age 3. So diseases, health care, let it go on. All of that, in my opinion, because with the advancement of where my son's at, I mean, if he had been born five years prior, he wouldn't have made it.
Speaker A: Yeah.
Speaker B: So it's important that the technology is there, but I think there's so many positive applications. But people are just scared because they just don't even know what to do with it. How do I approach it, how do I learn about it, how do I share my skills about it?
Speaker A: That's.
Speaker B: I think that's where people, as humans, we're just trying to figure out what's my path, what's my yellow brick road. We got the wizard of Oz over here at the Sphere. So I just want to make a reference.
Speaker A: I love it. So, uh, Jason, let's bring it all together. So, ah, what changes and opportunities? So what do they mean? In the context of transformation, we've talked about fobo, uh, we've talked about transformation, we've talked about artificial intelligence. So what opportunity do HR leaders have in this space? And the things we've talked about.
Speaker B: I think I have a phrase I use all the time, and I usually use it around influence, but I think people need to be more authentically vulnerable about this. Let people know what you don't know, ask for knowledge in other areas. Enlist people to help you. You're not alone. I don't know why people think they have to do this on their own. There's so many people that talk about this. Uh, in fact, we're always talking about it. But, um, I think you need to be authentic about where you're at and where you want to be and what, and what you're, um. Honestly, how much tolerance you have for change.
Speaker A: Yeah.
Speaker B: Because I, I always, I love saying this, but there's a great shirt I saw once, it says, I love change. You go first. Right. So, but sometimes you have to be the first one out. And also Peter Drucker, the, the godfather of leadership, once said, uh, one great concept, planned abandonment. So there's going to be some AI things you'll implement that you're going to have to abandon because it's just not working.
Speaker A: Yeah.
Speaker B: Be prepared to also have that perspective as well. No one's thinking really about that. But that's all the way back from Peter Drucker.
Speaker A: Yeah. So, Jason, I tend to end the podcast with our crystal ball question. And I asked our guests, like, where do you see, you know, your industry, your idea, in the next five to 10 years? We have covered a lot. So I don't know whether to ask you about where we see the automotive industry, where we see AI, where we see Toshiba. So maybe I'll just characterize it as in, where do we see the emergence of HR and HR adjacent technology being in the next five to 10 years?
Speaker B: I mean, I, I'm excited actually for what's, what's ahead. I mean, I see folks all around here. One of the things I'm even looking at is AI coaching. Why is that different? Because traditionally, uh, coaching has been reserved for leadership, executive management. It's been a more of a privileged. Right. But if I can give AI coaching to all the masses, I mean, think of how much more developed and how faster we would develop if I had it earlier on.
Speaker A: Yeah.
Speaker B: And I had the capability. So I'm excited for things like that.
Speaker A: Right.
Speaker B: It's going to prepare us for The. The future, not just faster, but will be more holistically rounded. Yeah. Than maybe one trick ponies. And we will. Maybe that'll break down silos.
Speaker A: Yeah. And democratizing things that. To your point, maybe the elite had access to, but. But others can now.
Speaker B: I had to wait 10 years to get an executive coach. It's terrible. I mean, I had good mentors, but. Yeah.
Speaker A: Yeah.
Speaker B: I mean, really think about that. I mean, just the ability. And there's many other applications that HR's got coming out. Right. Health being one of them. Like let loose on better ways to find plans that suit people's, uh, budgets. Right. There's got to be better ways we can think about health care. I think the paradigm of traditional healthcare, my opinion, is going to be on a revolutionary change.
Speaker A: Yes. I 100% agree with that. And candidly, it's probably the main reason why I come to work every day, because I think we're trying to do that. Right.
Speaker B: It's fun.
Speaker A: It is fun. It is. Jason, this was a ton of fun.
Speaker B: Yeah. Thank you.
Speaker A: I look forward to, after the podcast, just talking about the Dodge Viper among every other car it seems we have shared love of.
Speaker B: I've got a few friends.
Speaker A: Yeah. Nice. Well, again, thanks for joining this.
Speaker B: Of course. Thank you for having me. I really appreciate it.
Speaker A: And to our listeners, thanks, uh, so much for tuning in. This is the stretch again. This is season three, and we're doing things a little bit differently. We're going to bring you fresh perspectives, new ideas, and real conversations. Thanks so much for tuning in, and we'll talk to you soon.
Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.