
The Game with Alex Hormozi · 2026-06-30 · 10 min
Key moments - from our scoring
Substance score
52 / 100
Five dimensions, 20 points each
Hormozi presents data from his own content operation - 3 billion impressions, 4.5 million subscribers, and $106 million in weekend sales - to demonstrate a counterintuitive principle: views and revenue are not correlated. His highest-performing video (270K views) made significantly more money than his top six most-viewed videos (1.2M - 350K views) which generated zero sales. The distinction lies in audience composition. Beginner-oriented content, while generating vanity metrics, reaches people with minimal buying power. His most profitable videos target businesses earning over $100K annually, a segment representing less than 1% of the population. Hormozi advocates for "vertical value" - content that serves both beginners and advanced operators - but emphasizes that if forced to choose, revenue-generating specificity beats viral reach. He references his 10-stage zero-to-100-million roadmap and "Cash Cows" series (interviews with multimillion-dollar businesses) as examples of low-view, high-revenue content. The algorithm prioritizes engagement over conversion; creators must override it by analyzing their top 20% of customers, identifying common problems, and building messaging around those high-value segments. UTM tracking on video CTAs enables creators to measure content ROI accurately.
His six most-viewed videos (ranging from 1.2M to 350K views) generated zero sales and were beginner-oriented content. His highest revenue video had only 270K views and focused on advanced business topics like customer segmentation and monetization, proving that view count is not a reliable metric for business content success.
Niche content reaches a smaller but wealthier audience - people actually running businesses who have buying power - whereas broad beginner content reaches millions of people with minimal purchasing ability. With only 1% of the population operating substantial businesses, targeting that segment is more profitable than chasing 90% of views from non-buyers.
The roadmap is free content offered at acquisition.com/roadmap that breaks down the constraints and functions of scaling at each stage; it's an example of advanced, specific business content that generates significant revenue despite lower view counts because it targets people actually building companies.
Vertical value means creating content that serves both beginners and the 1% simultaneously - for example, explaining how the 1% think about money teaches newcomers and advanced operators alike. This approach generates both views and revenue, making it superior to purely top-of-funnel or purely advanced content.
Place UTM links in video descriptions and create CTAs directing viewers to lead magnets or next steps; this back-end tracking shows exactly which videos convert to sales and leads, letting creators override algorithm signals and make decisions based on actual business impact.
Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.
The episode packs substantial, actionable ideas: the core insight that high-view content ≠ high-revenue content is non-obvious and well-supported with concrete data (e.g., 1.2M-view videos generating zero sales vs. 270K-view video generating most revenue). The vertical value framework and the specific 51-to-1 wealth distribution principle are genuinely useful. However, there's some repetition and the latter half retreads the same points rather than introducing new angles.
the videos that made the most views, not in public, and more importantly, the videos that made the most money. And guess what? They're not the same.
I would honestly encourage you to just watch the 51 to one rule video because it actually takes this idea of like if you transpose money against population, you realize visually how disproportionate it is.
The core thesis - optimize for buyer value, not views - is not entirely new in creator circles, but Hormozi grounds it in specific comparative data (his own experiments and before/after metrics) rather than abstract theory. The 'vertical value' framework and the explicit 9% business-owner segmentation show some fresh thinking. However, the underlying targeting and audience-quality concept is fairly established; the originality lies mainly in the specific examples and quantified proof rather than conceptual novelty.
Because the idea was, if we make bigger, broader content, we're going to get more overall people. And then even though it'll be a smaller percentage, it'll be a bigger absolute number of the people in that bigger net that are going to be kind of whales or our customers, right? And so after doing that quarter, what was really interesting is that we broke all of our views records...The problem was book sales were down. Leads were down.
I want the starter and the $100 million guy to both be able to get value from this video. Right. Whereas if I'm talking about how to go from one to 10, I know that video is going to absolutely tank, but it's going to bring people who are between one and 10 million
This is a solo monologue by Alex Hormozi with no guest present. While Hormozi himself is a successful entrepreneur (he has a substantial portfolio company track record), the format is self-promotion of his own content strategy rather than an interview bringing in external expertise or perspective.
I'm also going to show you our behind the scenes data of the videos that made the most views, not in public, and more importantly, the videos that made the most money.
Exceptional specificity throughout. Hormozi cites exact metrics: 3 billion impressions, 4.5M subscribers, 35,000 pieces of content, $106M in weekend book-launch sales, specific view counts (1.2M, 1M, 800K, 500K, 270K), the 9% business-owner statistic, the 51-to-1 wealth ratio, and concrete examples (dietitian account with <6K followers generating >$1M/year, 9 likes on posts). He also names specific frameworks ('Cash Cows' series, the 10-stage roadmap) and provides UTM tracking methodology. Few abstractions; nearly every claim is anchored to numbers or named examples.
She had less than 5,000 or less than 6,000 followers on Instagram. And she was doing over a million dollars a year just from that...she was getting like nine likes, 18 likes, 20 likes on a big post.
three billion impressions last year. We gained over four and a half million subscribers and we did that making 35,000 pieces of content. And just to give some validity to the Mikey money part, we did over 106 million dollars in sales in a single weekend
This is a solo monologue with no host-guest interaction, questions, or follow-ups. There is no conversational craft to evaluate; Hormozi delivers a prepared speech with minimal pause for audience engagement or pushback. The structure is linear exposition rather than dynamic dialogue.
And so I want to outline high value, high ROI constant strategy, which I think is different than what the vast majority of people are trying to do. FYI, I'm also going to show you our behind the scenes data
And so I've done two tests on this in my career. One I did, I think, 18 months ago, where for one quarter, we made more top-of-funnel stuff.
Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.
Download your free personalized $100M scaling roadmap in under 30 seconds: Targeting actual buyers beats vanity metrics every time. In this episode, Alex reveals why the videos that make the most money rarely make the most views. Using real behind-the-scenes data from billions of impressions and millions in sales, he breaks down a high-value content strategy that turns attention into cash. In this episode 00:00 The disconnect between reach and revenue 02:00 Testing top-of-funnel vs. revenue-generating content 06:18 Why algorithm signals are misleading 07:19 How to create “vertical value” content More Value: Book Your Spot At The Live Scaling Workshop In Las Vegas: Get the $100M Book Bundle: Watch More Episodes on YouTube: Learn How to Scale Your Business: Discover The Easiest Business I Can Help You Start (Free Trial): Additional Free Books and Video Courses: DISCLOSURE: Information shared here is for educational purposes only. Individuals and business owners should evaluate their own business strategies and identify any potential risks. The information shared here is not a guarantee of success. Your results may vary. Copyright © 2026.
Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.
What type of content should you make that makes the most money, not necessarily gets the most reach? And so I've hit a grand total of three billion impressions last year. We gained over four and a half million subscribers and we did that making 35,000 pieces of content. And just to give some validity to the Mikey money part, we did over 106 million dollars in sales in a single weekend at my book launch.
And a big reason for that was because of the content strategy. And so I want to outline high value, high ROI constant strategy, which I think is different than what the vast majority of people are trying to do. FYI, I'm also going to show you our behind the scenes data of the videos that made the most views, not in public, and more importantly, the videos that made the most money. And guess what?
They're not the same. Number one is we have to answer the question, like, why do you make content to begin with? If you are somebody who makes content to sell as a media company, meaning you want to sell sponsorships and things like that, then you indirectly want to get buyers because you're getting buyers for your advertisers who are paying you dollars for ad spots, right? But the vast majority of the time advertisers don't know how to appropriately price media.
And so they basically just go off of audience and views. And so when that's the case, you are incentivized to just get as many views as possible because that's the business model. But the vast majority of people who are making content are not trying to build media businesses. They're usually trying to build businesses and use media as a way to get customers.
And so if that's you, then pay attention. So Number one, I remember when I had my biggest belief broken around this is there was a girl lady who had less than 5,000 or less than 6,000 followers on Instagram. And she was doing over a million dollars a year just from that. And I was like, this is crazy.
I looked at her account, she was getting like nine likes, 18 likes, 20 likes on a big post. And all she talked about was being a registered dietitian and how to bill insurance as a registered dietitian. So there's nothing about weight loss, nothing about how to be literally just billing. And it was so niche.
I was like, how is this making money? But the thing is, is that I can guarantee you that of the 5,000 or 6,000 people who were following her, almost all of them were intra-dietitians who were trying to build insurance better, right? And so I decided to put this to the test. And so I've done two tests on this in my career.
One I did, I think, 18 months ago, where for one quarter, we made more top-of-funnel stuff. Because the idea was, if we make bigger, broader content, we're going to get more overall people. And then even though it'll be a smaller percentage, it'll be a bigger absolute number of the people in that bigger net that are going to be kind of whales or our customers, right? And so after doing that quarter, what was really interesting is that we broke all of our views records.
And so all the numbers, like all the vanity metrics were going up. The problem was book sales were down. Leads were down. Portfolio company applications were down.
And so all of the metrics that I care about for the business were down. But all of the metrics that other people talk about for media were up. And so I had to make a decision of like what kind of creator am I? And for me...
I'm about the business. Like that is why I made it, right? That's why I started doing this to begin with was because it's a great way to build trust with an audience, deliver value, and just overall just grow. Now, I then, because I apparently like to learn the same lesson multiple times, decided to do another version of this more recently.
So I wanted to show you something really, really cool. And so check this out. Now, I almost never make content that's not about business in general. And that's just because I like business, and so that's what I make content about, okay?
And it's also where I think I have authority. I don't have authority in other spaces. I don't really talk about it so much. Now, these six videos that you see here are the top most viewed videos over the last quarter.
All right, and you can see 1.2, 1 million, 800K, 500K, 500K, 350, okay? So these are the most viewed videos. So what's interesting about these videos is they made no sales.
Think about how wild that is. Zero. None. Now, what are these videos all about?
All of these are, I would say, beginner-oriented. And that's because I have a little bit of a personal mission on that side, which is the reason I write these books. is because I always wanted someone to show me how to do things better than I feel like I got help on. And so I try to make this content to help somebody else out.
And for whatever reason, it makes me feel like I'm making some sort of impact, which when I'm alone at night looking at the ceiling, it makes me feel a little better. All right, that being said, from a business perspective, let's look at which videos actually generate the most revenue. So number one, most revenue video. This was a 270,000 video.
And I'll tell you this, when I made this video, I was like, this video is so good. I was like, I fucking love it. It was my favorite video the whole quarter, which by the way, you should check it out. I think it's fucking awesome.
But it's purely about like where the money is, how to make it, how to segment customers, and like the real stuff that makes money in a business. By its very nature, it tends to talk to people who already have businesses, right? And not just like smaller businesses, enough that you can like segment customers, right? And so it's by definition going to have a smaller viewership because only 9% of people in the United States, for example, have businesses.
And of those 9%, that's people who like have LLCs, including like your hairstylist and your nail salon girl. Yeah. To be fair, nothing wrong with that. It's absolutely a solopreneur business, and there's going to be more of them.
But in terms of what this was going to impact more, and it does work for that business as well, but they might not have the data to really utilize it. And so even of businesses that are doing over, let's say, $100,000 a year, all of a sudden you take that 9%, cut it by probably two-thirds, right? So it's a very, very small percentage of people who the content that I make at the most viable level applies to. Real quick, I'm going to show you the exact 10-stage roadmap from zero to 100 million plus.
that less than 1% of companies finish. I've now done multiple times. And so I can say with a lot of confidence that these are the stages as headcount increases that you need to get through. And I broke each of these down by eight different functions of the business, what the constraint feels like, like what are the symptoms of it when you're going through it?
And then what steps we actually took to graduate. And we've done this across software, physical products, service businesses, brick and mortar, all of this. And it works. And And it's my gift to you.
It's absolutely free. And so the link's in the description, but you just go acquisition.com forward slash roadmap, just enter info and it'll spit it right back to you all free. And so these other two videos, were episodes of what we're calling Cash Cows, which we're gonna have a new version coming out soon that we're calling something secretive, which I'll tell you later.
But this is me going deep with businesses that are all multimillion dollar businesses, right? And so these have 100,000 views, 250,000 views, so like not super high view counts, but these are the ones that generated the most revenue. And so the reason this is so important is that the algorithm will give you the wrong signal for your business. And so the algorithm will tell you what the most people like, not the most valuable people like.
And so if you think about it, I would honestly encourage you to just watch the 51 to one rule video because it actually takes this idea of like if you transpose money against population, you realize visually how disproportionate it is. And so you're trying to fight for this 50 percent of the audience that has two dollars, whereas the other 50 percent of the audience has ninety eight dollars. Right. A lot more.
And so this is where the mistake is happening. And people are taking the views as their signal for what their media strategy is going to be. And as somebody who's made this mistake multiple times, because it's hard to it's hard to pull yourself back because it's like, wait, but what if I have a video that is generate revenue and it's the right type of video and it gets a lot of views? It's like, well, that's nirvana.
Right. That's what we call quality. Right. That's quality and volume put together.
But if I had to pick between both videos, I would obviously want to pick the one that did generate revenue. So then the next question is, okay, well, are there videos that are called, you know, top of funnel that are videos that kind of bring people into your world? And then videos that kind of like middle funnel, bottom of funnel that kind of convert those people. And so I think the answer is yes and no.
We want to make videos that apply in terms of value equally to people at all stages in business, which is different than only having something that's valuable for somebody who makes over a certain amount. And so if I'm going broad, I still want what I'll call vertical value. I want the starter and the $100 million guy to both be able to get value from this video. Right.
Whereas if I'm talking about how to go from one to 10, I know that video is going to absolutely tank, but it's going to bring people who are between one and 10 million or looking to get to 10 or 20 and beyond. And that is going to generate significantly more revenue because they have more buying power, even if the numbers are smaller. And so I would encourage you to do a little bit of a challenge. And so on that point of this verticalization of value, this fourth best revenue generating video is kind of a good example of that, which is.
If I'm talking about how the 1% actually think about money, people who are in the 1% can still get a lot of value in terms of like what I'm talking about in that video. And also somebody who's brand new could get value from the video as well. And so that's kind of a video that's like that generates dollars, but it also gets views. And see, it has more views than the top one, two, three do, right?
And all the way at the end there, that video is literally just a straight Q&A for service businesses. But it's still generated the six-month revenue out of all videos that we made over the quarter. So this is my challenge to you. If you are afraid of making kind of deeper, more advanced content, do not be.
And do not think that when you get low views, you are somehow, you know, disserving your audience. You're serving a different audience. And the algorithm has gotten so good at transcribing and knowing exactly what you're talking about that they will serve it to only those people. But you have to remember that there's far fewer of the most valuable people than there are of the least valuable people.
And so if you have any concepts of business strategy, the idea is you want to serve, you either have a business that you want to serve everyone for as low cost as possible. And that's a Walmart strategy. Nothing wrong with that. It's a very hard business to run, but you can absolutely do it if you start with that day one.
Or what a lot of people who get into services do because it's significantly less scalable is they go for the higher end of the market because that's where the money is. If you want to get more buyers in your content, you have to make videos for your buyers. And if you don't know who your buyers are, you look at your customer base, you look at the people who spent the most money, look at the top 20%, look at the common factors they have, look at what messages and problems they had, and then create messaging and video topics that solve the problems that the people have the most money in your audience had, and then make content about that.
Be prepared to see your view counts go down, your subscriber counts go down, but your sales go up. Yeah, and from a tracking perspective, we just put UTMs on the links that were below the descriptions in the videos, and I'd make CTAs inside the videos to take the next step of whatever kind, a lead magnet, whatever. And that is how we could see on the back end how that translated into revenue for the business.
Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.