The B2B Podcast Index
Index
All categories
MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
MethodologySubmit
Best of:MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
An independent project byFame
SearchBest episodesGuestsInsightsMethodologySubmit a podcast
Index/Leadership/The Digital Lighthouse
The Digital Lighthouse artwork

What happens when water companies stop competing on data

The Digital Lighthouse · 2026-07-02 · 26 min

0:00--:--

Key moments - from our scoring

Substance score

55 / 100

Five dimensions, 20 points each

Insight Density11 / 20
Originality10 / 20
Guest Caliber13 / 20
Specificity & Evidence9 / 20
Conversational Craft12 / 20

The water industry has historically been slow to adopt digital transformation, but Melissa Talluk describes how this is changing through Stream, a pre-competitive collaboration between multiple UK water companies to standardize and share data openly. Rather than competing on data access, companies realized that fragmented publishing across 18 separate water utilities created friction for external users - researchers, innovators, startups, and even other parts of the water industry itself. Stream consolidates this into one standardized portal at streamwaterdata.co.uk, applying consistent data standards, metadata, and formats to enable cross-company analysis. The initiative operates across multiple stakeholder layers: research and academia, private industry, government, regulators, and water companies themselves (who often benefit most from access to industry-wide data). Talluk emphasizes that success depends less on technology and more on people, leadership, and organizational culture. The initiative is now exploring citizen science data integration - currently fragmented across 100,000+ volunteer scientists in the UK - and building interoperability with other UK data nodes (energy, agri-food, health) to enable cross-sector analysis. The vision is deliberately patient: publishing data with clear use cases, tracking value realization through stories, and accepting that meaningful impact takes time as decisions cascade into real-world changes.

Key takeaways

  • →Water companies competing individually on data publishing creates friction; Stream's collaborative, standardized approach benefits all stakeholders by reducing pre-processing burden and enabling cross-company insight.
  • →Digital transformation success in regulated industries depends primarily on people, culture, and leadership enablement rather than technology - legacy organizations must actively change cultures formed during lower-tech eras.
  • →Open data value realization requires patience; there's a significant lag between publication and value capture, with the chain only completing when downstream decisions or processes actually change.
  • →Citizen science data - currently fragmented across thousands of volunteers - represents an untapped asset that could drive environmental change if standardized and connected using the same principles Stream applies to utility data.
  • →Building interoperability across data nodes (water, energy, agri-food, health) ahead of use cases enables faster cross-sector problem-solving and prevents 12-18 month delays when urgent data fusion is needed.

Guests

Melissa Talluk

Topics in this episode

data standardizationStream InitiativeAnglian WaterOpen data infrastructureCitizen science dataUK water sectorPre-competitive collaborationData interoperabilityUtility data sharingCross-sector data integration

Questions this episode answers

What is the Stream Initiative and why did water companies decide to collaborate on data instead of competing?

Stream is a pre-competitive collaboration between UK water companies that operates standardized open data infrastructure at streamwaterdata.co.uk. Companies realized that each publishing independently across 18 separate utilities created friction for external users; collaborating on consistent data standards, formats, and a single portal reduced pre-processing burden and made data more accessible for innovation, research, and value creation.

Why is digital adoption slow in the water industry compared to other sectors?

It's not a technology problem but a people problem rooted in organizational culture and leadership. The water industry was privatized in the 1980s with very low digital maturity; the resulting culture, shaped by those low-tech formative years, is difficult to change. Legacy organizations struggle to enable new perspectives and curiosity because existing culture and leadership attitudes may either support or stifle innovation.

How does Stream measure success and create value from open data?

Stream publishes data with purpose using specific use cases and actively tracks how external users - researchers, startups, and other water companies - convert data into products, services, or improved decisions. They document and share these success stories to inspire further innovation, but acknowledge a significant time lag between publication and realized value as downstream decisions and processes take time to generate impact.

What is citizen science data and why is Stream interested in it?

Citizen science data refers to scientific observations collected by volunteers studying their local environment - species presence, water quality, channel shape changes, etc. The UK has the world's third-largest citizen scientist population, but their data is currently fragmented. Stream plans to standardize and integrate this data using the same principles applied to utility data, so volunteer efforts drive systemic environmental change rather than remaining isolated efforts.

How does Stream fit into a broader UK data ecosystem and why does that matter?

Stream sees itself as one node in a larger network of UK data infrastructure spanning water, energy, agri-food, health, and transport. By aligning on trust frameworks and technical standards now, different sectors can share data seamlessly when use cases require cross-sector insight - avoiding 12-18 month delays and enabling faster solutions to complex problems that no single industry can solve alone.

What our scoring noted

Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.

Insight Density

11 / 20

The episode covers substantive territory around data sharing infrastructure, stakeholder management, and cross-sector interoperability, but much of it remains at a conceptual level with limited concrete implementation details or novel frameworks. The discussion of citizen science data, pre-competitive collaboration models, and the lag between data publication and value realization offers some genuine insights, but significant portions involve reiteration of principles (culture matters, people are key, patience is needed) without deep exploration of how to operationalize them.

It's not the tech, it's the people. All of this, and it'll be common across what sector you're in. It's a people challenge as much as is a technology challenge.
There's actually sometimes quite a lag in the rest of that value chain because that value chain only completes when a different action is taken off the back of whatever somebody has done.

Originality

10 / 20

While the Stream initiative itself represents a practical application of open data principles in utilities, the underlying thinking - open data unlocks innovation, silos block value, cross-sector collaboration matters - is well-established in data strategy discourse. The citizen science angle is more distinctive, but remains underdeveloped. The episode largely reinforces existing orthodoxy around data sharing without presenting contrarian or deeply first-principles arguments that would challenge typical operator assumptions.

So put more data into more people's hands. The natural extension was putting that data into people outside of the organization to drive innovation.
it's all about unlocking value... we publish with purpose.

Guest Caliber

13 / 20

Melissa Talluk brings legitimate depth: 30+ years in water, hands-on roles across operations/engineering/data, head of data at a major utility (Anglian Water), and currently co-leading an active industry initiative. This is genuine practitioner experience at scale, not a consultant or thought-leader. However, the conversation doesn't fully leverage her operational scars or extract granular lessons from the specific challenges she's navigated; the interview stays at a higher abstraction level.

I've been able to experience quite a lot of different roles within a water company, know, from frontline operations to asset management to scientific to most latterly into data and digital
when I was head of data and digital in a water company, it was something I was looking at as a natural evolution

Specificity & Evidence

9 / 20

The episode lacks concrete metrics, named examples, timelines, and quantified outcomes. There are no specific examples of data use cases that generated measurable value, no dollar figures, no user adoption numbers, no timeline for the initiative's milestones, and limited detail on which exact citizen science projects or organizations are being engaged. References to learnings from Canada, America, Australia, and South Korea are vague. The discussion remains largely illustrative rather than evidential.

we seek out stories of how people have taken that data and generated value as a result of it, be that in the world of research, be that in the world of new products and service development
it's a data silo challenge times about 100,000... the citizen science movement in the UK is, we're in the top three in the world for the number of active citizen scientists

Conversational Craft

12 / 20

Zoe asks thoughtful, contextual follow-up questions and attempts to draw out specifics (e.g., asking what Stream stands for, how stakeholders are categorized, what specific initiatives are underway). However, she rarely pushes back on claims, doesn't probe contradictions, and misses opportunities to dig into operational friction or trade-offs. The conversation feels collaborative and agreeable rather than investigative; few moments where the host challenges or tests the guest's framing.

Can you tell us a bit about the journey that led you to where you are today?
Do you have to like break this down? Do you have kind of ways you think about categorizing all your stakeholders?

Conversation analysis

Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.

Most-used words

data66water43different23industry22value18digital16challenges12back11world9change9culture8together8tech7sector7environment7challenge7

Episode notes

The water sector faces some of the UK’s biggest environmental and infrastructure challenges. But solving them requires more than better technology. It requires better collaboration. In this episode of The Digital Lighthouse , Zoe Cunningham is joined by Melissa Tallack , co-lead of the Stream initiative and former Head of Data and Digital at Anglian Water. Together they explore how water companies are working together to share data, learn from other industries and create more value for customers, society and the environment. Melissa explains why breaking down data silos within organisations is only the first step. The real opportunity comes from sharing knowledge across an industry, and ultimately across sectors. From rail and energy to health and citizen science, she shares why the best ideas rarely stay in one place. Whether you’re leading digital transformation in utilities, government or another regulated industry, this conversation offers practical lessons on open data, collaboration and creating lasting value. In this episode, you’ll learn: Why water companies are collaborating on open data rather than competing.

Full transcript

26 min

Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.

Zoe Cunningham: Hello and welcome to the Digital Lighthouse where we get inspiration from tech leaders to help us navigate the exciting and ever-evolving world of digital transformation. I'm Zoe Cunningham. We believe that meaningful conversations can illuminate the path forward, helping us to harness the power of technology for innovation, scalability and sustainability. In this episode, I'm delighted to introduce Melissa Talluk, an expert with over 30 years working in the water industry, including as the head of data and digital at Anglian Water.

Melissa has undertaken a wide range of roles, including operations, scientific, engineering, asset management, change and data and technology, resulting in a broad and deep understanding of the sector. Melissa is currently co-leading the Transformative and Collaborative Stream Initiative, which has established and operates data sharing infrastructure to unlock the power of water data to realise value for customers, society and the environment. In this episode, we'll be exploring why open data initiatives for our public utilities are so essential and how we can overcome the challenges and complexities of working within a highly regulated and essential service to deliver on this.

So Melissa, welcome to the Digital Lighthouse. Thank you for having me. Can you tell us a bit about the journey that led you to where you are today? OK.

So when I left university, I knew I wanted to do something with water. It was a bit of a sliding doors moment. I could have kind of gone off down to the National Rivers Authority that then became the Environment Agency ⁓ or could have gone into a water company. Yeah, frankly, what tip tip.

for me to go down the water company route was my mum was doing a evening class with somebody who worked at a water company and that was the clincher. That's it happens isn't it when you're young. But it was a kind of an interesting sort of like dilemma at that age to sort of like which direction do I want to go in. I just knew I wanted to work in the world of water.

And then you've now been in the water industry your whole career. Are there any kind of like you know highlights from that time? Do you know I've been like count myself as really fortunate to have been able to experience quite a lot of different roles within a water company, know, from frontline operations to asset management to scientific to most latterly into data and digital and actually being able to grow up through and in a water company enables you to have a different perspective when you're in the world of data and digital to try and solve some of the challenges you faced when you were in the on the front line and so putting data into the hands of people when they need it the most, where they need it.

So it was a good ⁓ journey through a water company that enabled me to really solve some real challenges through data and digital. Brilliant. Well, we'll come on to that. Well, and something we talk about a lot is the importance of context when you're building a digital system, right?

And actually, all of those small bits of knowledge that people in the organisation often have, but not the digital team. So if you're bringing that to the role, that's obviously like a huge asset. And the other advantage that you have is obviously having worked in the same industry for such a long time, you've got the kind of knowledge of the history. So how would you say, you know, the state of data and digital has been like going back even 30 years?

Has it been a journey where things have been quick to modernise or have there been like, you know, challenges in adoption or even understanding what you can do? Yeah, I mean, you have to remember when I came into the industry, it was off the back of privatisation. So it was when the water authorities became water companies. yeah, I mean, the level of digital enablement in those days was very, very low.

We didn't even have email. mobile phones weren't a thing, know, and being out in the field, you'd have to carry a case full of paper maps of where the assets were, you know, you couldn't look anything up. you know, was very, very low tech when I first came into the industry. And then obviously over time, different sort of technologies, softwares, platforms, etc.

came in. I mean, I guess to go to your question about like, is it quick to adopt? I'd say If I was marking its homework, I'd say it probably could do better. You're right, right.

But yet we still are kind of where we're at today. There's always some progress, right? Yes, that's right. Yeah.

And I think it's kind of like the pace of change. That's the difference. So back in sort of like the early 90s, post privatisation, the pace of change is very different to the pace that we experience now. Yeah.

Do you think there's anything specific? Because I talk to guests from all different sectors, which each have their own unique challenges. What do you think of the specific challenges for the water industry when it comes to digital adoption? It's not the tech, it's the people.

All of this, and it'll be common across what sector you're in. It's a people challenge as much as is a technology challenge. it depends on leadership, it depends on the prevailing culture of your organization, and it depends on capability. And it's kind of like if you've kind of got you're missing some of those ingredients, it can make or break, you know, your stance towards the adoption of technology.

The people element of tech is so, important. And you're always going to be missing some, right? because we kind of have this idea of like, ⁓ you're a leader or you're an emerging leader and say, now you need to have these skills. But of course, we're actually all individual human beings as well with strengths and weaknesses in different areas.

I guess sometimes it's also about how well those gaps fit together and whether you have people who can kind of cover for each other. Yeah, that's right. And I think it's this is why it comes back to culture is like if new people kind of join the industry with those fresh perspectives and that curiosity. If the culture stifles, you know, those people coming in with the right capabilities and, you know, outlook and curiosity, you know, that can be a bit of a problem, which, often culture is the thing that you don't necessarily see at work.

So it's really important to be aware of it and the, you know, it's like leadership. Is the leadership saying, how can we enable this? Or are they kind of standing in the way of progress? And being aware of that as a leader, I think, is really important.

I think also, just kind of tying it in with, like, looking back to, where we've come from. I do think it's a challenge for organizations that have been around for longer that your culture is very much set at a time. when like you say, the challenges were different, the technology was different. So actually the culture needs to change and changing culture is different from this and harder than just establishing a new culture where you're like, okay, great, you know, we're tech first off we go.

You kind of have to get there. ⁓ Like you say, with the people who were part of the old, you know, that was their formative ⁓ experience. Yeah, indeed. ⁓ OK, so out of all this, we have the stream initiative, which you are the co lead on.

is that just to start with, is that an acronym for it's funny you should ask that because if you asked AI, OK, it would hallucinate and say it an right. Yes. Which is just tells the story of why you should treat with caution any any answer from AI. No, it doesn't stand for anything.

Sometimes people. capitalise it and it's not it isn't capitals it's not an acronym we should probably get some t-shirts saying stream is not an acronym but it doesn't stand for anything in that sense it just alludes to the fact it's streams of data that's why we chose the name. Yeah and I guess you have streams of water as well don't you? Well we love a water analogy.

So tell me about what it is then. So it started as a collaboration project between a number of water companies who were each thinking around that they wanted to embrace open data. Certainly when I was head of data and digital in a water company, it was something I was looking at as a natural evolution from having opened up data within the company. So put more data into more people's hands.

The natural extension was putting that data into people outside of the organization to drive innovation. So here's our challenges, here's some data to... to play with and tell us what you find and tell us what you build as products and services off the back of that. So there were a couple of, well more than a couple of, handful of water companies kind of thinking the same thing at the same time, came together, agreed it was something that was better done together as an industry.

Collectively. Yeah, rather than, you know, if put yourself in the shoes of a data user, you don't want to go to 18 different places to. to scour for data that's being published openly, you want to kind go to one place. Well, and you've got all the challenges of you want the data to be in the same conformity.

don't want to be translating from, we've got this field from these people, but we haven't got that information. now we can pro, know, 100%. And that was the other challenge we were trying to avoid is that, I looking at the same data from published by different companies? and to be able to join that data, do I have to do a lot of pre-processing on that data?

we were just looking at sort of how can we reduce all of those sort of maybe small friction points in people's lives. But if you want people to generate value from the data, you've got to make their lives as easy as possible, the path of least resistance. So that's kind of why we came together. And we operate in a pre-competitive space.

So it's like the collaboration is really important. We were all working together. because we've all worked together, we've been able to share sort best practice across the industry as well. And that, you know, we say the rising tide lifts all boats.

Everybody's benefited from that because we have a philosophy of, you know, bring and give what you can and take what you need in terms of best practice and guidance. Right, and then you're also getting that consistency kind of almost as a byproduct because someone's saying, well, we did it this way and you're oh, that's a great idea. Let's do that as well. We have quite frequent knowledge shares where we might, you know, it might be within an industry discussion.

So how are you doing this? How are you assessing your own open data maturity or something like that? But we'll also bring in outside in speakers. So people who have done it in rail, people have done it in energy.

and say, how did you do it? So we learn from others, not just amongst ourselves. Yeah, because there's common challenges. Yeah, there's data, there's data.

Right. Yeah. Like you say, it's about a kind of incremental process of keeping, opening it up. But like, you kind of, and this is true for a lot of organisations, right?

You kind of actually start with these silos within your own organisation. and you need to kind of break those down and share the information. But then within an industry there's data but actually then cross industry. There's so much opportunity to share and learn and find new ways of doing things.

That's really where the real potential lies. Like you say, it's kind of like layers of an onion. ⁓ The in company silos, the intra industry silos and then the cross sector silos. And actually, really, our real world is an interconnected system of systems.

So if our data isn't operating in that way, then we're not truly reflecting the complexity of our real world. So some of our challenges require data from multiple places to come together to generate insight and change. Yes, because it's actually something where, as a ⁓ user of water services, which we all are, it can actually be deceptive. simple, you know, it feels deceptively simple to me.

Like my whole life, my interaction with water has been I turn on the tap and boom, there's water. So it's easy. lucky? Yeah, right.

Well, very much so. And also, it's just it's understandable then how easy it is for people who don't know about the water industry to misunderstand the complexity of it. Yeah. Yeah.

I mean, there's an awful lot to from taking water from the environment. creating ⁓ a wholesome product from that raw water and taking it away again and cleaning it up and putting it back into the environment, back into the water cycle. We've kind of broadly covered the aims of Stream. Are there any specific aims?

Have you got any kind of targets? I mean really it's all about unlocking value. So know our vision is to unlock the value of water data, so water sector data, not just water industry data, so water sector data. to benefit customer society and the environment.

And that's a pretty broad ⁓ remit in that sense. But we keep focused on value generation because we can publish data for data's sake, but actually that has a cost to it. So there has to be a trade-off at that. So it's like what value is being generated from publishing that data, which is why we use use cases.

⁓ as a vehicle to say, we do this, this value could be generated by X, Y and Z. So we publish with purpose. And then we also are interested in hearing stories and we seek out stories of how people have taken that data and generated value as a result of it, be that in the world of research, be that in the world of new products and service development that can then go back into the industry to help improve performance or for more public good. Yes.

so, you know, we track, we close the loop, we track the stories of how people have converted that data. And, you know, it never fails to surprise me. And I love hearing stories of how people have used the data in ways that we perhaps never even conceived that they might use it. And we make sure we document them, we share those stories with everybody, because that generates that.

kind of, well, I want to do more because I want to generate more value like that. And it's kind of one thing that in some ways you feel like, ⁓ well, we'll build it, know, build it and they will come and, you know, people will be inspired and they'll have new ideas. And of course, you don't want to say this is the only way to do it. But actually, sometimes without that, it's another form of knowledge sharing, isn't it?

To say, this is how others have used it. And that can often be an easier way in to go. ⁓ actually, it sparks. Yeah, it sparks another use.

Yeah, definitely. We've definitely seen that. So you're clearly managing like a very broad group of stakeholders from all kinds of different places. Do you have to like break this down?

Do you have kind of ways you think about categorizing all your stakeholders or kind of maps internally for who they were? Yes, yes. As you might imagine, we do do we put a lot of effort into what we call community management and understanding Who are the users? It's very easy to identify who are the publishers.

Well, usually it's very easy to identify that, but it's who stands to benefit from access or better access to data. So we do categorize our community. They're like a self-selecting community as well because we have things like our LinkedIn channel and our website and we try to get to know our community of users. So we'll have research and academia.

We'll have private industry, ⁓ government, regulators. Water companies themselves are also consumers of the data. That's one of the nice sort of side benefits that actually when you're publishing data from a water company, the people who benefit most often are the people in the water company themselves. Different parts of the water company can get access to not just their data, but other data from across the industry.

So yes, we do look at that. We call it our data ecosystem and we put a lot of effort into that because again it's all about people. So again if we can understand motivations needs then we can make sure we're meeting those needs. you're serving it and delivering what people Because they're the people who convert the data to value so we have to look after them.

I just love how many times you've used the word value in this conversation, because I think in all of the best tech conversations, that is the key word and the key thing to be thinking about. And I also love the idea that perhaps, you know, this was an experimental idea by the water companies and like, wouldn't it be great if, but now that it's up and running, you can actually say, well, what are we putting in and what value are we getting out and actually seeing that. once you start, you know, there's this kind of win-win idea that actually you can get more out than you put in.

Yeah, definitely. But, you know, one thing we've learned along the way is that is patience because there is a time lag between you putting data, publishing data openly. Yeah. people picking it up, understanding it, using it, accessing it and creating value.

There's actually sometimes quite a lag in the rest of that value chain because that value chain only completes when a different action is taken off the back of whatever somebody has done. So if a different decision got made or a different process is enabled. it can be quite a lag between the first act of publishing that and somebody picking it up and doing ⁓ and generating value. We have to learn patience with that.

It's not an overnight thing. Click publish one day and tomorrow the... Boom, everything's better. If ⁓ only it was that quick because we are very impatient.

⁓ Well, it is tough. And also I can imagine that you kind of say the point of change is when someone makes a different decision. But then the impact of that decision takes time as well. If someone's changing how something's structured, it's really actually could be very long.

process. And sometimes the path to that value is bumpy as well. have to acknowledge that because it's change. What kind of specific initiatives are you running or are ongoing, you know, that you get involved with that maybe might be of interest to people who are watching the podcast or in the industry or in other industries wanting to learn from what you're doing?

Yeah, I mean, I suppose one of the things that we're we're planning on working on or in the process of working on that excites me personally, being a scientist by training is citizen science data and the huge, huge untapped potential of that data that is currently distributed and fragmented. It's a classic data silo challenge times about 100,000. It's huge. know, the citizen science movement in the UK is, we're in the top three in the world for the number of active citizen scientists.

And just to clarify what you mean, you mean it's essentially individuals working on their own, undertaking some form of scientific research. Some scientific observations, and that might be, you know, absence or presence of species, or it might be water quality. or it might be the change in channel shape. It can be anything.

It's people who are operating with an interest in the natural environment, and particularly, obviously, for us, the water environment, doing some great work. And I just want to see their data drive change and be put to work, really, beyond what they do on the ground day to day. Because I think we owe it. It's a lot of volunteer effort.

⁓ But the thing that excites us is it's a data challenge. And some of the things we've done within the water industry to standardise and bring data to ⁓ become more accessible, findable and understandable and join up easy. Applying all of that learning to the challenge of citizen science data for the benefit of everybody, that's really exciting ⁓ and huge potential. Can't wait.

Yeah. And then the other thing that excites me is that, you know, we're seeing, we see ourselves as one small node within a bigger network of data sharing infrastructure in the UK. And going back to my point about like, can't look at the world through a silo. You know, we can't look at some of the challenges that the water sector faces just through the lens of water data.

have to look at energy and agri-food and transport and, you know, health. there's so much opportunity there too. So we're kind of setting our sights on the, I suppose, the next layer of the onion really. Because, you know, again, it's kind of gone through the whole conversation, like how interconnected and how complex our modern environments are that we live in.

But what benefit we get from that, from these, you know, so many people in different industries with different responsibilities and different objectives, but all of those little pieces, if they're connected up correctly, just again, deliver such value for, Yeah, so we enjoy, you know, reaching out to our peers in different parts of, you know, the UK ecosystem, you know, via energy or agri-food or health, like I say, and make sure that what we're doing facilitates that interoperability between those different nodes, if you like, so that data can flow at the point at which we have a a use case that says it has to bring this data together from different places, that we know that that is a possibility and that's going to be, you know, we're thinking about that ahead of time rather than at the point in which we do it and we go, ⁓ well, we can't do it, or it's going to take another 12 months, 18 months.

So it's important. And then we feel it's a duty as a node within that network to make sure that the decisions we're making. about like trust frameworks, about data standards, technical standards mean that we can join up without friction. And I guess there you're kind of fitting in with not just the water industry and maybe other utilities or other public sector, you know, organizations, but actually with the tech industry and like the open data movements and things like that, would you say there's kind of learnings from there as well that you're taking on?

we take learning from everywhere and not even just in the UK, know, some of our initial inspiration came from like Canada and America and you know Australia, it's like you know we look anywhere for South Korea, know, they've been, public open data, you know, it's, we look anywhere for inspiration and we would much rather learn from someone else than have to figure it out. Yeah, right. Yeah. It's how we've been able to move fast because, you know, we don't believe we have to invent everything.

We can adopt and adapt for our circumstances. Brilliant. And so where can people go to find out more information? So they can follow us on LinkedIn, ⁓ Stream and Locking Water Data.

They have a channel on LinkedIn and we post regularly sort of like what we're up to and things that we're doing or have done. tell some stories and then we have our website which is ⁓ www.streamwaterdata.co.

uk People can go and have a look at the website, go and see what data is on the data portal. Can't find what you want, what you're looking for. There's a way to contact us, the feedback form, tell us what you're trying to do and what you need and we'll go from there. That is fantastic.

Well thank you so much Melissa for joining us on the Digital Lighthouse and helping us to shine a light for others. Thank you. This Digital Lighthouse episode was edited by Steve Folland and produced by Patrick Anderson. The theme music was written and recorded by Ben Bailo.

A huge thanks to our sponsor, Softwire, for their continuing support from the inception of the show in 2019 to the present day. If you love the podcast, please let us know with a rating and review on your platform of choice. We're always looking for feedback to ensure we're making the best show possible. And if you'd like to take part, please drop us a line at thedigitallighthouse at softwire.

com. You've been listening to the Digital Lighthouse with me, Zoe Cunningham. Thank you for sharing your time with us and stay safe on this wild technological ride that we're all on.

Related episodes across the Index

Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.

  • Why Google Cloud let partners do the talking with Manoj Gunti, Google CloudProduct Marketing Maestros: Tales from the Front Lines · on Data interoperability74 / 100
  • 49: Scaling a Consulting Firm Without Losing Culture with Stuart PackhamThe Consulting Growth Podcast · on data standardization53 / 100
  • How to Lift the Burden and Cut Costs of Managing Banking Regulations and Compliance in MENADisruption Demystified · on data standardization49 / 100
  • The Hidden Costs of Complexity in Treasury OperationsThe Treasury Update Podcast · on data standardization43 / 100

More from The Digital Lighthouse

All episodes →
  • How insurance is driving the future of autonomous cars68 / 100
  • Why digital transformation rarely goes to plan75 / 100
  • Why leaders need to create space for thinking75 / 100
  • Why AI is like a highly motivated intern
  • Why AI creates knowledge debt and how leaders stay in control with Macs Dickinson
Explore the best B2B Leadership podcasts →
All The Digital Lighthouse episodes →