The B2B Podcast Index
Index
All categories
MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
MethodologySubmit
Best of:MarketingSalesSaaSFinanceHROpsLeadershipCustomer SuccessAI & DataProductStartups & FoundersRevOpsEngineering & DevTools
An independent project byFame
All showsSearchBest episodesGuestsInsightsMethodologySubmit a podcast
Index/Pivot
Pivot artwork

Trump's War on "Artificial Intelligence," Elon v. Scott, and Google's Wall Street Meltdown

Pivot · 2026-10-30 · 1h 1m

0:00--:--

Key moments - from our scoring

Substance score

52 / 100

Five dimensions, 20 points each

Insight Density10 / 20
Originality12 / 20
Guest Caliber8 / 20
Specificity & Evidence13 / 20
Conversational Craft9 / 20

This episode of Pivot opens with characteristic irreverence as Kara Swisher and Scott Galloway riff on Trump's recent directive to eliminate the term "artificial intelligence" from government documents and replace it with "superintelligence" - a move even conservative commentators like Matt Walsh have called politically tone-deaf. The hosts mock the rebranding effort while acknowledging the actual stakes of AI governance. The conversation shifts to Galloway's escalating public criticism of Elon Musk, particularly over comments about a potential Tesla-SpaceX merger that suggested SpaceX shareholders might be exploited. Musk responded dismissively on X, calling Galloway clueless - which Galloway interprets as validation. Galloway elaborates on his "traitor to the West" characterization, drawing a WWII analogy about disarming military assets while Putin praises Musk's actions. The final segment covers the midterm elections, with recent polling showing Democrats leading Republicans 53-44% among likely voters. Discussion includes the bizarre Alaska Senate race where Republican operatives allegedly recruited a candidate with the same name as incumbent Dan Sullivan to split votes, Trump's promise of a $1 million bounty for voter fraud tips, and praise for Obama's recent campaign trail presence alongside Jon Ossoff.

Key takeaways

  • →Trump's rebranding of AI as "superintelligence" is strategically incoherent governance that even conservatives find bizarre, yet the real risks of AI development remain unaddressed.
  • →Galloway's criticism of Elon Musk for undermining U.S. military capabilities through Starlink decisions in Ukraine parallels hypothetical WWII scenarios of disarming Allied bombers mid-operation.
  • →Democrats hold a significant polling advantage (53-44%) heading into midterms, with Obama's campaign appearances generating notable charisma and momentum.
  • →The Alaska Senate race features an apparent dirty trick where operatives recruited a same-named candidate to split Republican votes, prompting Trump's calls for prosecution.
  • →Trump's last-minute voter fraud bounty offer and focus on AI terminology distract from substantive policy messaging on inflation and economic concerns.

About Pivot

Hosted by New York Magazine. The show scores 71.5/100 on substance across its analysed episodes. See the full show profile.

Guests

Scott Galloway

Topics in this episode

Trump's AI terminology banSuperintelligence rebrandingElon Musk and Starlink Ukraine policyTesla-SpaceX merger rumors2024 U.S. Midterm electionsAlaska Senate race (Dan Sullivan, Mary Peltola)Democrat polling advantageObama campaign trail appearancesJon OssoffVoter fraud bounties

Questions this episode answers

Why is Trump banning the term artificial intelligence from government documents?

Trump has instructed federal agencies to use "superintelligence" instead of "AI," calling AI an inaccurate and very bad term, though the specific reasoning is unclear. Even Matt Walsh called it the weirdest political hill to die on.

What did Elon Musk say in response to Scott Galloway's criticism?

Musk posted that Galloway "never had any clue" after Galloway suggested Tesla is the patient and SpaceX shareholders are the donors in a potential merger, implying Galloway lacks understanding of the companies.

Why did Scott Galloway call Elon Musk a traitor to the West?

Galloway argues Musk is undermining U.S. military capability and public wishes to defend against Putin by controlling Starlink systems, drawing a parallel to a WWII CEO disarming B17 bombers mid-bombing run without government consent.

What is happening in Alaska's Senate race?

Governor Mike Dunleavy ordered an investigation into reports that Democratic operatives recruited a candidate with the same name as Republican incumbent Dan Sullivan to split his vote and help Democrat Mary Peltola win.

What does recent midterm polling show?

Democrats are leading Republicans 53-44% among likely voters heading into the midterms, with Obama generating strong momentum on the campaign trail.

What our scoring noted

Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.

Insight Density

10 / 20

The episode has a handful of genuinely sharp observations - particularly around Microsoft's CapEx discipline vs. Alphabet's spending spiral, the K-shaped workforce dynamic, and Nvidia's circular investment structure - but these are buried under extended Halloween costume banter, tour promotion, newsletter plugs, and personal anecdotes that consume a substantial portion of the runtime.

This is what marks AI age. We beat on earnings and we're asking 60,000 people to leave.
Is Nvidia's demand signal organic or self funded?

Originality

12 / 20

The circular-financing framing of Nvidia's investment web is a genuinely fresh and well-articulated critique, and the K-shaped 'humans get buyout packages, GPUs get blank checks' line is a punchy original construction. The rest - political commentary, streaming competition takes, layoff advice - largely recycles widely circulated views.

The metaphor is this is a company that's, that's selling shovels, it's investing in the miners, and it also owns a stake in the bank, lending money to the miners to buy the shovels.
humans get biopackages and GPUs get huge blank checks and Bonuses

Guest Caliber

8 / 20

There are no outside guests - the episode is solely Kara Swisher and Scott Galloway, both credible commentators with real industry backgrounds, but Galloway has shifted firmly into pundit/thought-leader mode and neither host is a current operating practitioner sharing first-hand operational intelligence at scale.

And I'm Scott Gower.
I've been fired from the Charthouse, Montreal Aunties, uh, Islands, uh, which was a burger change. I was fired from the restaurant at LA Fitness.

Specificity & Evidence

13 / 20

The earnings analysis sections are genuinely data-rich - specific CapEx figures, cloud growth percentages, debt multiples, Anthropic revenue-per-employee progression, and a detailed streaming market share breakdown by platform - giving a B2B operator real numbers to anchor judgments, though the political and cultural commentary segments are considerably vaguer.

CAPEX hit get this, 51.4 billion in a single quarter. That's more than Google's cloud's entire quarterly revenue and long term debt is up 6x year over year from 21
Anthropic is already the second greatest revenue per employee employee in the world. It went from 1.4 million to 6 million per employee

Conversational Craft

9 / 20

Swisher occasionally pushes for deeper analysis with pointed follow-ups ('Is it lack of discipline or things are shifting?', 'How does it go wrong? Or how does it go right?'), but the overall dynamic is a friendly, mutually validating chat with minimal real challenge; unchallenged claims and frequent topic drift into personal banter undercut the intellectual rigor.

What does Wall street do when they see that? Is it lack of discipline or things are shifting for this company in terms of its revenue profile?
How does it go wrong? Or how does it go right? Let's be fair.

Conversation analysis

Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.

Share of words spoken

  • Speaker E45%
  • Speaker D45%
  • Speaker B3%
  • Speaker F3%
  • Speaker H2%
  • Speaker A1%
  • Speaker K1%
  • Speaker G1%
  • Speaker C1%
  • Speaker M0%
  • Speaker L0%
  • Speaker I0%
  • Speaker N0%
  • Speaker J0%

Most-used words

show23pivot23meta19nvidia19love18scott18back18feel16keep16youtube16harvey15interesting15billion15trump13long13revenue13

Episode notes

Kara and Scott unpack Trump's bizarre attempt to ban the term “AI,” Elon Musk finally taking aim at Scott, and the final countdown to the midterms. Then, they discuss Microsoft's earnings win, Alphabet's Wall Street stumble, and Nvidia's increasingly circular AI investments. Plus, former Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer faces backlash over using AI to describe her daughter.

Full transcript

1h 1m

Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.

Speaker A: If you're looking to hire, you need Indeed. With Indeed Sponsored Jobs, you can spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Less stress, less time, more results. And listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit to help your job get the premium status it deserves@ Indeed.com podcast just go to Indeed.com podcast right now and and support our show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. Indeed.com podcast terms and conditions apply. Need to hire. This is a job for Indeed Sponsored Jobs.

Speaker B: Support for the show comes from Harvey AI. It starts with a handshake. A word becomes an agreement. An agreement becomes a contract. A contract becomes bound by law. Today, Harvey, the AI platform designed specifically for legal work, is powering the next step. More than 200,000 lawyers and 80 of the AMLA 100 are building with Harvey, accelerating review, sharpening, negotiations, and more. Learn more at Harvey AI. Uh, Harvey does not provide legal advice. Users should always independently review and verify any output from Harvey.

Speaker C: I'm a voice agent powered by Deepgram. I don't just understand words. I understand context. Like, when you're at Trivia Night and say I'm on fire, it means you got the last three questions right. But when you're camping and say I'm on fire, it means a spark just landed on your highly flammable synthetic rain pants. Deepgram understands words in context across stt, tts, and voice agents. That means better conversations at production scale. Learn more@Deepgram.com Context is everything.

Speaker D: I feel like the president feels like he's got two years left to molest the country for as much money as possible.

Speaker E: Hi, everyone. This is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media podcast network. I'm Kara Swisher and I love AI.

Speaker D: And I'm Scott Gower.

Speaker E: You need to say AI because Trump is banning it.

Speaker D: Yes, but I just want to be clear. This in no way is a distraction. And also, it's real. I think this is outstanding governance. Um, I think this just is what he should be focused on. And, uh, no, I think this is a good move, rebranding his governance. I think, uh, this is absolutely the hill to die on. For the President

Speaker E: and the Cheesecake Factory. Correct. And the Cheesecake Factory.

Speaker D: No, there's AI companies filing 2 trillion doll IPOs and committing half a trillion to compute, and in their risk section saying that they might destroy humanity. But no, uh, superintelligence is where he should be focused.

Speaker E: Yeah, I think so, too. I think it's a good Spot for him. He can play with himself. Let's rename

Speaker D: the iceberg before we hit it.

Speaker E: Yes.

Speaker D: What are we going to call it? No, no, don't call it IB not iceberg. But it's coming right towards us, sir. Shut the fuck up. Call it IB Focus. AI

Speaker E: B A I, I B. I like it. Oh God. That's why you're such a genius marketing professor.

Speaker D: Oh yeah. That's it.

Speaker E: That's it.

Speaker D: That's what they call it.

Speaker E: That's what they're doing. Are you ready for Halloween, Scott?

Speaker D: Ready? I'm already full Halloweened up. I got three different costumes.

Speaker E: Okay, which one are you wearing? You look a little tired. I've heard you've been going out in New York. I've had sightings of you.

Speaker D: Uh oh. Do you have your spies out?

Speaker E: I do. I need to speak to you about it on the tour next week.

Speaker D: I would. You know, daddy did go a little deep in the paint.

Speaker E: Yeah, yeah. I'm getting.

Speaker D: Is the fact that I'm shaking and have advil and an I.V. attached to my eyeballs.

Speaker E: An A.I. an A.I. attached to you, not an I.V.

Speaker D: it's like. Was Scott out partying last night? Chances are,

Speaker E: yeah.

Speaker D: Good question.

Speaker E: Mhm.

Speaker D: Good question.

Speaker E: Interesting, interesting. Yeah, I was out last night. What are you wearing? Which one did you pick for Halloween?

Speaker D: I switched last night. I was gonna go as Larry David.

Speaker E: Yeah.

Speaker D: And despite the fact that it's not I'm looking for, I'm like, ah, God, it's just too unfuckable.

Speaker E: I know. Yeah, that's what I mean. I just

Speaker D: couldn't do it.

Speaker E: I knew you couldn't.

Speaker D: And I took it off and then I had this Darth Vader thing, but it looked like a blouse. It just didn't look. I look like Delta Burke from what was that great show,

Speaker E: uh, Designing Women. Such a good show.

Speaker D: That was a good show.

Speaker E: I love Delta Burke. I look

Speaker D: like Delta Burke with like a stereo panel on her chest. That was my Darth Vader outfit. And I'm like, okay, this doesn't work.

Speaker E: Okay.

Speaker D: And then what did I do? Oh, I had spider man, but it was too tight. I think I gained some weight.

Speaker E: Oh no, you can't be fat Spider Man. You'll be like the one in Times Square. Dirty fat Spider

Speaker D: Man. Yeah, yeah. I look flat. I

Speaker E: love dirty fat Spider Man. In time. No, it's

Speaker D: even worse. I'm not even fat right now. I'm skinny fat. I'm skinny at soft. Which

Speaker E: Skinny fat. Skinny

Speaker D: fat, Skinny

Speaker E: fat. I love that you're absolutely right. People can be skinny and fat.

Speaker D: Skinny, fat.

Speaker E: Yeah.

Speaker D: Uh, but the alcohol and the blueberry muffin and three coffees I've had this morning is really going to put me on the chicken. You're really good.

Speaker E: You know, when I was in Michigan last weekend, I hugged Alex, and he is so. He's so fit that I almost broke my nose hugging him like, ow.

Speaker D: He's a brick house. He's a brick house.

Speaker E: He's not skinny. He's just not soft in any way.

Speaker D: No, no.

Speaker E: But. So what did you decide? Are you gonna go with Scott Galloway? What is happening?

Speaker D: No, I totally screwed up. I went the same thing as when I went last year. I put on my old Deadpool outfit, which is always a crowd pleaser.

Speaker E: That's a good thing. But

Speaker D: everybody under the age of 40 is like, are, uh, you Iron Man? I'm like, jesus Christ. Get your characters. I'm

Speaker E: thinking Halloween isn't till Saturday.

Speaker D: Oh, not in New York, my sweetheart. Halloween started last night. Oh,

Speaker E: damn. And

Speaker D: it goes every night.

Speaker E: Yeah. By

Speaker D: Saturday. By Saturday, I'll have had a massive schematic stroke. By the time Halloween rolls around, by the time there are kids out on the street, yeah. There's like a 40% chance I'm still with us.

Speaker E: Oh, well, um, I'm doing a big Halloween in my house. I decorate quite a bit, as you know. I got more stuff. I got ghosts. I just got glow up chains. I got a new blow up for the top of the roof, which I went out on my roof the other and put it up, which was crazy. But the neighborhood seems to like it. All the kids. I'm popular with the children. Yeah. It's really. I'm gonna have. I'm deciding whether to have full candy bars or, uh, not. What do you think? Cause that'll just. That'll just lock it for me.

Speaker D: I have this image of you accidentally ending up in a very, like, maga. Right wing neighborhood, and people rolling by you with their kids and then pulling their kids close to them and screaming at you, sinner.

Speaker E: No, they love me. They love me in the same way. Why does that

Speaker D: make me happy? Yeah, I'm

Speaker E: full. I may have to do. I don't know.

Speaker D: That's wrong.

Speaker E: I don't know. Anyway, uh, excited about. I'm coming to new, uh, on Sunday, I think.

Speaker D: That's right. We have this whole tour thing,

Speaker E: huh? Uh-huh. Yeah, yeah, we're busy. We're going to get new photos done of Scott and I, which is very Exciting. So you better look, get some, like, Korean mask or something before Monday, because we're taking photography of ourselves again, and this is eight years ago. I don't see

Speaker D: ethnicity with my beauty products. Okay? I don't care. It's just a mask.

Speaker E: Whatever it takes. It's just a mask from

Speaker D: Southeast Asia. Y' all need to

Speaker E: look good. I don't like to

Speaker D: appropriate cultures with my beauty routine. You don't want to know. You want to know what my beauty routine is? What?

Speaker E: What? Ah.

Speaker D: I splash water on my face.

Speaker E: Okay, well, you need to look good. We're gonna do makeup. I think we're gonna have to. Obviously, um, we're gonna do that. And I'm gonna be, uh. You know, I'm going on the View on Monday.

Speaker D: Oh, you're going on again. They m must like you.

Speaker E: Yeah, I'm going on. I have a special guest I'm bringing. Not you.

Speaker D: Um, does Allison own that?

Speaker E: No.

Speaker D: Tessie knows

Speaker E: abc. Yeah, I know, right? No, no, no, no, no. It's exciting. Um, so are you gonna be ready for our event?

Speaker D: I'm super excited. Okay. It's gonna be fun. It's gonna be fun. We've got great guests

Speaker E: everywhere. It. There's so much fucking news. And we'll have the election and thank God we'll be in Toronto on election day. If we have to stay there, um, we'll seek asylum there for ourselves or whatever, um, because Elon will become president. Um, but the reason I was talking about artificial intelligence, AI, because Trump has been officially banning the term from government documents and newswords. Everything else in short order. In this post, he called out Wall Street Journal for not using his preferred term, superintelligence, or si, which is Sports Illustrated calling AI the very bad and inaccurate name. I don't know why that it's unclear. If you don't comply, what'll happen. Anyway, that's what that it was. Um, so we will just say AI, AI, AI all the time today, just as much as we can. You know, the letters AI are in a lot of words. Did you know that? Faith. There's AI Pops up a lot of places.

Speaker D: Well, that's why people come to the show for that type of blinding insight.

Speaker E: Just saying it's interesting pain, which you are in, obviously, right now.

Speaker D: Um,

Speaker E: I'll think of words over the course of the show. This is ridiculous. Even Matt Walsh called the thing the weirdest political hell to die on. So there you have it. It's just dumb. Um, do you have any other good names for AI if you were going to rename it

Speaker D: Mass Extinction Event. Um.

Speaker E: Oh, hey, that's. We're rich.

Speaker D: We're rich. We're not. We're rich. No, wait. We're dead. Wait,

Speaker E: Dead.

Speaker D: Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. No.

Speaker E: Okay. All right, let me speak. Speaking of which, it's been a busy. Speaking of, like, pronouncements, it's been a busy week for you. You got called out by Musk. Finally.

Speaker D: Finally,

Speaker E: you've been taking it to him. I've noticed all the. You're, like, really going for it. You've been calling him all manner of names. He responded, uh, to a video posted on X of you discussing the potential Tesla SpaceX merger, where you said, Tesla is the patient and SpaceX shareholders of the Oregon donors, which was very funny. Um, you were making a point in context of Tesla's declining deliveries, uh, and sales. But apparently it didn't sit well with Elon, who was posted, quote, he never had any clue. Uh, how do you feel? You've been going at him, not just on that, but I've noticed on your other.

Speaker D: You say something minor about him, he threatens to put you in prison. I

Speaker E: know, right? Let's review.

Speaker D: I called him a menace, an addict, and a traitor to the West.

Speaker E: Yes, A traitor to the West. I was very. And what

Speaker D: triggers him is that I say one group of shareholders might be getting taken advantage of. That's what he decides.

Speaker E: Yeah.

Speaker D: You know, uh, uh, quite frankly, I just feel validated. I feel like my parking has just been validated by, I don't know, by Elon Musk. Well,

Speaker E: he hasn't threatened you. He just said, you don't have a clue. He's calling you stupid, I think. But he's gotta really threaten you with swords.

Speaker D: Yeah, which. Which, you know, there's some truth to that. I'm gonna reflect on it.

Speaker E: If he threatens you, swords, and you're dressed as Deadpool, that. That'll work, right? Doesn't he have swords? Do you have swords in your Deadpool outfit?

Speaker D: I do, but they're really difficult to haul around, and you can't sit down and have dinner,

Speaker E: and

Speaker D: people come and take them and, you know, walking around with swords is rough.

Speaker E: Is it? Well, good.

Speaker D: Good. I'm

Speaker E: glad he didn't physically threaten you. Why did you call him Traitor of the west, may I ask? I didn't watch that. When I watched the others, I didn't get. I saw it. I pop up. Traitor of the

Speaker D: world because he is. Because he's undermining the military capability and, um, the wishes of the US Public to defend against a murderous autocrat and save Europe again from an invasion. I've said this before. If the CEO of Boeing, uh, in World War II, somehow had the ability to disarm B17s, which we had, I think, lent as bombers to. To Britain, that person, and then, without cooperation of the government, the military, without giving Churchill a heads up, turned off the guidance systems mid bombing run against the Nazis, what would we call that person?

Speaker E: Right. No, you're absolutely right. Putin praised him this week. You didn't. Well,

Speaker D: there you go. Maybe he can be a character witness at the trial. Yeah,

Speaker E: that was weird. I was like, that's not a very good recommendation. Putin.

Speaker D: We're at the hearing. I don't know if he's gonna be

Speaker E: hearing. It'll be a hearing.

Speaker D: Tried.

Speaker E: Yeah, it's going to be a hearing.

Speaker D: It's going to be a hearing.

Speaker E: Yeah. You'll be the witness. You'll be the witness. If you can get yourself together long enough to do some

Speaker D: stuff. You're

Speaker E: really suffering today. Oh, my.

Speaker D: You got

Speaker E: to get ready this weekend. You need to rest. No going out. And if I get my. And, uh, don't shake the drink like you just shake it. I got a ginger

Speaker D: iced tea. Oh,

Speaker E: uh, whatever you need. That.

Speaker D: This will solve my problems. I

Speaker E: know. Let me just tell you, you better rest this weekend. I have my spies everywhere and I will know what you did. I'm going to put a tracker on you. Anyway, I'm going to rest. I'm just going to do Halloween and spend with kids and stuff like that. Anyway, um, as we mentioned, uh, we are gonna be this next big week. We kick off in New York and then we're headed all around the country. Uh, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Toronto, um, Denver, all places. Um, but we're going on tour. We're also launching a newsletter, the Pivot Post. Uh, we get fantastic questions from our listeners every week, and this will be a perfect place to answer them. Plus, more opportunities for the dick jokes from Scott. God help us. Um, and as we travel the country on tour next week, we'll be sending out three special editions filled with photos, behind the scenes content. Go to pivotshow.com to sign up. Scott's not a newsletter fan, but I love it. We're gonna have all manner of things and we'll see how it goes. We're considering some new features, including more shows, and so it'll be there first. Um, we'll answer questions from listeners, we'll solicit essays from our Friends of Pivot. I don't know. We'll do whatever we want. We'll paint whatever picture we want. But I think it's nice for our fans to get more stuff. Uh, we're not gonna weekly do a long pontificating thing, uh, or anything, El. I think it's kind of interesting to experiment in different mediums, uh, with all kinds of things. We obviously have the show.

Speaker D: Hold on. Am I hungover and sensitive? A long weekly pontificate. Are you describing my newsletter?

Speaker E: No. No, no, no.

Speaker D: Was that passive aggressive?

Speaker E: No, I was thinking of someone else. No, I like your essays from no. Marcino Malice. I think they're quite good. I like them. You're a very good writer.

Speaker D: You actually

Speaker E: are. I assume you write it yourself, but, um, you do. You work hard at writing. I don't like writing anymore as much as you do.

Speaker D: You think about fitness? There's physical fitness. I think the ultimate mental is writing. I think it is, hands down, the hardest thing I do, hands down.

Speaker E: I'm working on a book, and I'm having trouble, like, getting it done

Speaker D: every time. About two chapters. I'm writing a book, too. Two chapters in my latest into my current book. I'm like, how on earth did I agree to do this again?

Speaker E: Correct.

Speaker D: I'm, like, shocked.

Speaker E: Yeah.

Speaker D: You know, supposedly during or right after childbirth, the hormone comes over the female brain such that you forget how awful it is. Such that you'll do it again. Uh, for about every time you finish a book, I'm convinced that hormone comes out because you would never do it again. If you remember what it's like in chapter three, when you're trying to figure out a way to say something unique about AI. Uh,

Speaker E: yeah, exactly. That'll last

Speaker D: in this six months. It

Speaker E: will

Speaker D: age well in six months. When it finally gets on the shelf.

Speaker E: It's absolutely hard. I have to say. I did it for the last two days working, uh, with people I'm working on this book with. And it was like, everything else is so easy. It's a pleasure and book writing, really hard. Um, but we're gonna try to keep this one fun, and we'll see where it goes. We'll see where it go. It goes. We're not, uh. I like the name the Post. You know, Amanda came up with that name,

Speaker D: the Post.

Speaker E: Pivot Post.

Speaker D: Oh, our newsletter. Yeah. Oh, good.

Speaker E: Yes.

Speaker D: Oh, yeah. And I'm super excited about that. Anyway,

Speaker E: sign up@pivotshow.com. all right, we're going to a quick break. When we come back, it's the final countdown to the midterms.

Speaker D: Support for the show comes from Zbiotics. I know a lot of us like to have some drinks during vacations. I just got back from vacation myself. If you do, we'd like to tell you about Pre Alcohol by Zbiotics. Zbiotics Pre Alcohol Probiotic drink is the world's first genetically engineered probiotic. It was engineered by PhD microbiologists to break down acetaldehyde, an unwanted byproduct of alcohol metabolism. Make pre alcohol your first drink of the night, drink responsibly and enjoy your next day activities. Zebiotics has sold more than 14 million bottles and earned the trust of thousands including, uh, I am trying to drink less as I get older, but I do still enjoy a cocktail and my first drink before I go out is in

Speaker B: fact Zebiotics. I was using it before they became a sponsor. Try for yourself today. If you are unsatisfied, they will refund your entire order, no questions asked. Head to zbiotics.com pivot code pivot for 15% off your first order. Zebiotics is a partner of ours.

Speaker F: Support for this show comes from Quince. There's nothing better than that sweater. You know the one, we all have it. It's perfectly warm and you

Speaker E: can't help but reach for it again and again as the weather gets cooler. If you don't have one yet, there's probably one on Quince's website with your name on it. Quince makes elevated everyday essentials using premium materials like Mongolian cashmere, organic cotton and premium stretch denim. The designs are timeless, thoughtfully crafted and made to be worn again and again. Again, the 100% Mongolian cashmere sweaters start at just $50, giving you the softness and quality you expect from a luxury brand without the luxury price tag. I am about to get a ton of Quint's items because I'm going to be wearing them on the upcoming Pivot tour. But right now I am actually using my cardigan because it's which I love from Quince. It's very comfortable. It's so soft and the weather's starting to get cooler. I also have an amazing blazer. I use a black blazer that is just. It looks rich. It isn't expensive at all. So find the fall pieces you'll reach for most at Quints. Download the Quince app for App Exclusive offers or go to quints.com get free shipping on your order and 365 day returns now available in Canada and the UK too. And when Quints Ask you where you heard about them, Let them know it was pivot. It's the best way to support the show.

Speaker B: Support for the show comes from Harvey AI Uh. It starts with a handshake. Two people find common ground and shake on it. A word becomes an agreement. An agreement becomes a contract. A contract becomes bound by law. For centuries, law has made our promises durable. Agreements are how we live side by side, settle our differences, build businesses, and move forward together. Today, Harvey, the AI platform designed specifically for legal work, is writing the next chapter of that legacy, helping lawyers handle those agreements more effectively and bring their expertise to more people. Harvey is trusted by more than 3,000 customers across 70 countries. More than 200,000 lawyers, 80% of the AmLaw, 120% of the Fortune 500 are all building with Harvey. Harvey. They're accelerating, review, sharpening negotiations and covering insights, drafting first responses and more. And they're doing it all in one secure place built for legal teams. This is how the future of agreements is being crafted now. Learn more at Harvey AI. Uh, Harvey does not provide legal advice. Users should always independently review and verify any output from Harvey.

Speaker E: Scott. We're back with more news. We're just days away from the midterms. Let's get into one of the more bizarre midterm battles. Alaska's Republican Governor Mike Dunleavy has ordered an investigation into reports that Democratic operatives recruited a candidate with the same name as incumbent Republican Senator Dan Sullivan. The New York Times investigation found the effort was reportedly aimed at splitting Sullivan's vote to help Democrat Mary Peltola win the Senate race. Trump has called for Peltola to be prosecuted, while his Justice Department has sued to block the certification of the results of the second sul cost the incumbent the election. We'll go through more stuff. Trump is making a last minute push to win over voters with promises of cash payments, including a $1 million reward for tips about voter fraud that can lead to an arresting conviction, which is just nonsense. Recent polling shows Democrats leading Republicans 53 to 44% among likely voters. I did a very long, um, show, uh, with Hillary this week about that, and she had some predictions of various things, but I'd like to hear yours, uh, where this is going, um, and if anything really stands out. Besides, Obama has a really tough tight, a tight 10, as they say. You know, he's just really funny. Um, I'm not sure if it'll matter, but I have to say it's quite enjoyable to watch him stumping for various candidates and, and him and Ossof Together was like amazing charisma, tsunami, essentially. Um,

Speaker D: Yeah. I feel like the 90210 of politics. Yeah,

Speaker E: exactly. Yeah. He's still got it. I gotta say. He's still got it.

Speaker D: I can't figure out their strategy. Like, as you know, let's make our final, final case to the voters and tell them that anyone who says artificial intelligence is the enemy. I don't get the strategy here. They're having to defend places like Kansas. He never would have thought. And then bounties for voter fraud, uh, gas at 440 a gallon, and then a favorable. When Democrats had their big win in 2018, they were D +7. This time they're D +9 now. I do think in certain places, you're probably gonna see the Republican poll better than we think. The one that always does is Susan Collins. You never know polls. For some reason, it may never seem to get that right.

Speaker E: Right.

Speaker D: But I'm nervous because I'm really hopeful. Um,

Speaker E: don't be hopeless.

Speaker D: Obviously, everyone's gonna have their eyes on the Senate. What are your thoughts?

Speaker E: Um, I'm not an expert. Hillary had some very interesting thoughts about it, but I think probably the Democrats will win both. Uh, it just seems like that. It seems a momentum. But again, you're right. It's always a mirage. Right. It' I will say the candidates are on the Democratic side, are terrific. Really

Speaker D: strong. Really strong. Not

Speaker E: fake strong, you know, and some people are, like, flashy strong. Um, I just think they're all like, everywhere you go, and they're all different. Amy Acton is an Ohio against Vivek, which I think should be a slam dunk, given his behavior. And by the way, she's been backed by yet another step, uh, sibling about what happened to her. Um, I mean, she shouldn't have to be, but this is where we are. Um, I saw really interesting. AOC is out stumping for people a lot, which is really interesting. She had a great. I gotta tell you, they're so. They're so good. She said, do you know they're pushing back on this communism thing? Because these are the arguments of the Republican communism trans. And call it si. That's their. Like. I'm like, do these have anything to do with people's lives? I don't think so. But one of the things she pushed back, and I thought it was well done, was common sense, not communism. And I thought, you know, in a short word, in the way she delivered. It was smart. It was like super smart. Um, I think every one of them is different and Interesting. I just. That's my takeaway. And they're very healing. Now the question is, are there these ghost Republicans who don't do polls and

Speaker D: they're suddenly

Speaker E: m gonna. In my experience with people I know who are pro Trump, they're very disillusioned. I would say they feel very disillusioned. The question will they just pull that lever for Trump again? If it's one, he's not on the ballot, which he isn't, and two, when they feel so, uh, taken advantage of, like the Joe Rogans have switched. All those guys have switched in that regard. And quite, uh, voc. I don't know. I don't know. I just. I'm just going to. I'm glad we're in Toronto. That's all I have to say.

Speaker D: But let's look at the data. A real Clear Polling's generic ballot average has Democrats up 8.3 points. Decision Desk HQ 79% chance demonstrate Democrats take the House 238 seats for scale. Democrats won the 2018 House popular vote by 8.6 points and picked up 40 seats. And according to Kalshee, it put the odds of a Democratic blue tsunami at 57%, up from 45% just two weeks ago. So that's real momentum. Now, what does this tsunami mean? There's actual technical definitions here. Tsunami means Democrats win at least 235 House seats and 51 Senate seats. A blue wave 218 House seats, but Republicans maintain control of Senate. Cal state has it 82%. And then a quote unquote new category mega tsunami. 240 House seats, 54 Senate 25%. So the momentum is just. It usually tightens at the end, right? Yeah. But it appears that the momentum. Momentum is with them. My favorite is what he's offering Republican voters a 5,000. What? Trump is offering a $5,000 Trump dividend to every adult citizen if Republicans hold both chambers. 8 billion in direct payments to farmers, up to $30,000 for government fraud tips and settling the remaining Camp Lejeune water contamination claims. That's my favorite one. Only if Republicans win. I'll settle the Camp Lejeune water contamination claims if we win the House and the Senate. That's kind of an odd one.

Speaker E: Yeah. Yeah. The crowds. I never go by the crowds, but it's really interesting to watch in Texas. The huge, I mean, tell Rico keeps having to get bigger and bigger, um, venues. And Ken Pax is in these sad little old people places like that. But old people vote. So, you know, I don't Know, like, will people actually vote? That's the thing. I think it is. You know, it is get out the vote. The other thing that I think people are not paying enough attention to is Trump's, uh, outbursts. These weird, you know, Jade. Or like, he does them. Can't pronounce Ken Paxton's name. Is something going on with him? Because he keeps doing

Speaker D: what happens to old men. We just start making noises involuntarily.

Speaker E: I know, but honestly, it's really astonishing. The two things that people. I'm kind of surprised were these new rape allegations, uh, against him. And I know the report from Congress was Democratic, but this woman was in the New York Times piece, um, and said she couldn't say everything. She had been vetted by the New York Times. And then she has this woman said she was violently raped by Trump. Um, and so I'm surprised that there's not more coverage. That it's probably because newspapers have really have to lock those things down before they say anything. But there's just. This guy has fallen apart in real time. And I think the scary part to me is not so much. I think the Democrats will probably sweep. But, um, if they don't sweep enough, or even if they sweep, what happens between, uh, uh, November 3rd and seating these people? What craziness could ensue? Um, and because he's obviously cognitively declining rather precipitously, um, worries me, you know, and what will his acolytes do? They may just abandon him if he really loses a lot, if he loses his power. You know, the. The emperor has no clothes. And let's not

Speaker D: November 4th. He's a

Speaker E: lame duck.

Speaker D: He's a lame duck. But speaking of my newsletter, which you hate.

Speaker E: I don't hate your newsletter. I'm just not on substack.

Speaker D: The title of it. The title of it. Well, anyone can get it. I love

Speaker E: no Mercy, no Malice. I read that every week. That's not true. I read it on my. Okay, I

Speaker D: appreciate that you. Anyway, so. So, um, 440,000 subscribers, FYI. Anyway, so, uh, the title of this week's no Mercy is Criminal. Uh, and guess who it's about.

Speaker E: Who?

Speaker D: Well, I'll give you one guess.

Speaker E: Yeah, I know, I know. Criminal. Yeah.

Speaker D: But, yeah, I think, like, I've never thought the cognitive decline or the health stuff or whatever is. I've always thought it's Democrats, kind of hoping. Um, but his criminality, it appears like you. You know, have you. Do you remember those 70s or 80s TV shows where they said to someone here's, a shopping cart. And you have two minutes to throw as much shit in as possible and get out. And you just see Western capitalism and consumption culture at its worst. I feel like the president feels like he's got two years left to molest the country for as much money as possible. And that he feels his lawyers have said, no one's gonna put you in prison. Which I actually agree. Uh, just do whatever you can. And it feels like he's just get. He had more stock trades than the rest of Congress combined.

Speaker E: I know. Yeah.

Speaker D: And he knew it was going to come out. He files them. He doesn't care. I think he literally believes I'm immune for this stuff. I got to think we're going to find out about all sorts of things. Well, the

Speaker E: Jared Kushner stuff, some of this reporting that's coming out, it's just there's a lot. And it's all linked to money. Every single bit of it is linked to money. It's not.

Speaker D: The Marxist presidency for me is. There's a picture of Jared and Ivanka, and they're both very attractive. They both look really good. And it said, uh, just FYI, one thing they share this couple shares is both of their fathers are convicted felons. And I thought that kind of marks this presidency.

Speaker E: Yeah, absolutely. Anyway, uh, we'll see what happens. We'll see. Uh, we won't know in New York, but we will know when we're in Canada, I think. We'll know. We'll see, um, Toronto. We're excited to come there. It's probably

Speaker D: not a bad idea. We're going to be in Toronto. I

Speaker E: know. That's why I said we're going to do. We may never

Speaker D: come back. What happened to Karen, Scott? They live in Saskatchewan.

Speaker E: Saskatchewan. Together. They have a. They have an alpaca farm. It's really fun. Scott is drinking himself cheers

Speaker D: all day. He shears land all day. And

Speaker E: Kara's enjoying the hardware store. He bought a

Speaker D: pickup truck and pulls up and yells at the help.

Speaker E: Yeah, exactly. Yeah. That would be so much. That would be such a good reality show.

Speaker D: Um, that'd, uh, be

Speaker E: such a good reality show.

Speaker D: Even get Sarah Palin up there with us.

Speaker E: Okay. All right, we're not going to do that, but let's get to some actual tech earnings. Microsoft beat Wall street quarterly expectations with revenue up 19%. Its Azure cloud business grew 48%, which is a lot. The capital spending came in below expectations at 45.2 billion. Shares rose nearly 4%. And pre market traders, it Looks like they got a hold of their spending. Microsoft is offering voluntary buyers to about 60,000 employees. It looks to reduce costs while continuing to invest in AI. Uh, shares for Alphabet though are down 13% at the time of the taping, putting the company on course for its biggest ever post. Ear earnings drop. The Google parent company missed Wall street quarterly earnings expectations for the first time in nearly four years despite revenue growing 25%. The company reported negative free cash flow of 9 billion while long term debt jumped to nearly 480% to $125 billion. Cloud revenue more than doubled to 30 uh.7 billion. But search advertising revenue missed expectations, growing 12%. Google's Gemini app now has reached 1 billion users. I will note the company is facing questions about its AI search tool, including from me, which wouldn't straight answer. When asked who won the 2020 election, the company responded to my threads post about the issue saying they're fixing it and there was a technical gap in the 2020 election information very sus because Claude and all I checked all the others were just fine and the only one they wouldn't answer was about the Biden election. Uh, and they answered the Trump ones very clearly. Give um, us a thought on these, on these earnings um, because they're sort of two different ones and I do think I find myself in search using Claude much more, it happens to be my choice, um, than I do Google, although I still use Google Search, um, and Gemini, that's on the Google search page. And Microsoft I think showed a little more discipline. But your thoughts?

Speaker D: Well one just with respect to market expectations, one beat them and one probably missed them. Um, Microsoft did nearly the impossible here and that is they thread the needle between what is, you know, it's a reasonable amount of capex while maintaining incredible top line growth. They had a beat on revenue, they're up 19% and Azure was up 48% while CapEx came in below expectations. So this again this is the earnings report that was able to kind of thread the needle that the market wanted and that is growth without some runaway spending that marks the age right and that and then as a Result shares popped 4% while Alphabet actually cratered in the wrong direction. And the more interesting part of the story I think is that a 60,000 person or employee um, buyout offering sitting next to accelerating AI. Capex is the clear like our K shaped economy or two workforces if you will is really the market for tech and that is humans get biopackages and GPUs get huge blank checks and Bonuses,

Speaker E: huh? Uh, that's an interesting observation.

Speaker D: This is what marks AI age. We beat on earnings and we're asking 60,000 people to leave.

Speaker E: Yeah, there was a great post. Someone said um, to all software engineers, 19, I don't know 83 to 20, 26, you had a good run or something like that.

Speaker D: But the headlines and this is where the monetization and the idolatry of the dollar and shareholders shareholder value over trumping everything in the age it is America right now. I think the headline a couple decades ago and definitely 40 or 50 years ago would have been Microsoft laying off 60,000 people. Instead the headline is top and bottom beat from Microsoft. Whatever the God we pray to now is shareholders. And then Alpha Alphabet, um, was actually a bigger story. And this was Alphabet's first top and bottom miss in nearly four years. And the stock shed 9, 10% after hours. That's the worst post earnings reaction on record despite revenue actually growing 25% and beating some estimates. That's how crazy the expectations have become.

Speaker E: Yeah, but the long term debt thing I think is what freaked them out. The long term debt jumping the negative cash flow. Um, even though things did grow. Right. And it seems like search is something's happening with surge or it's shifting. Let's just say it's shifting.

Speaker D: Well free cash flow went negative to 9 billion and second straight negative quarter CAPEX hit get this, 51.4 billion in a single quarter. That's more than Google's cloud's entire quarterly revenue and long term debt is up 6x year over year from 21. So what is that?

Speaker E: What does Wall street do when they see that? Is it lack of discipline or things are shifting for this company in terms of its revenue profile?

Speaker D: Well no lack of ROI and that is Microsoft was able to say okay, our CapEx is actually less and earnings are more than expected. Whereas um, the fears around all these guys that the returns are just not going to catch up, the R is not going to catch up to the O and the I and that the capex has just become. They're like someone who can't stop eating and it's become an arms race and like the Soviet Union it's going to collapse on itself trying to keep up with the uh, one or two players right now I would say meta and you would argue Alphabet. I'm sorry Meta and Microsoft are probably, is this accurate? Probably showing the most visible signs of return on a massive capex.

Speaker E: Still massive. Still hasn't but showing signs of it. Right. By the way, it's technically R and I and O is just on. Thank

Speaker D: you.

Speaker E: No problem.

Speaker D: Again, more blinding insight. Uh, is there an A and an I in ROI? Anyway, um, and also it just that the 2020 glitch that it can't answer who won 2020, this kind of technical gap is just really bad timing for, for an AI search tool won't state a settled fact. And, and that kind of undercuts the very, very AI narrative the company needs to justify the capex.

Speaker E: Yeah. The thing is, either you're not good at it or you're sus. There's no good answer here. Right. In terms of how they couldn't do it after all this time.

Speaker D: Yeah. So look, Microsoft, uh, thread the needle and it looks like Alphabet from the market perspective is on the wrong side of the needle. But again, I think the number here that is the most important number is 60,000. 60,000 people. I mean, that's enormous. So

Speaker E: I wonder what they'll do if they don't get 60,000. What are they when you, when you do a layoff? I've never done a massive layoff, obviously, but you're aware of that. You've had more experience when you offer 60,000, how many do you expect? And then what do you do if you. There's got to be a number they are going for, not 60,000. Right. Presumably,

Speaker D: yeah. So they calibrate it, probably using AI and say if we offer this much. But what you also do is you have a hand hammer. And that is basically buyouts come with sort of a Sophie's Choice, and that is take it. Now, maybe you don't want it, but by the way, if you don't accept it, there's a chance you'll be laid off with a much less generous severance package.

Speaker E: Yeah, that's what they're doing at Paramount, they're doing in different parts of the company, volunteering.

Speaker D: And folks, you know, who, uh, always over indexes on these lists, just FYI, young people, people who are working remotely, it's just much easier to lay off people you don't know. And you're dramatically. The odds of you being laid off are dramatically higher when you work, um, remotely. But what you do, or typically in a layoff, and I've been through a bunch of these, um, you go to the people who. You don't like to say this out loud, but I believe this, 10% of the employees at 120% of the value, and the other 90% are negative of 20. That's not that you don't need Them, but they take a lot of management time. They're good, not great. Uh, obviously just statistically half the workforce is going to be at average or below average. Typically what you do in a layoff is you go to the really key people and you say this is what we're doing tomorrow, uh, we're actually going to increase or this is why you are so important here. And then you do the layoff. And they've uh, already calibrated of those 60,000 people, how many they, they want to leave? They've already, you know, if it's a generous buyout package with a hammer on the back end, they might be expecting 40 or 50,000 if it's. But when you offer, I think when you offer someone a buyout you also got to keep in mind in terms of morale, is that person going to be really motivated from that point? Even if they're motivated, aren't they just going to be fearful? So it's not. And uh, typically when you do a layer layoff and this is an aspirational, my, my advice is always go deeper than you want because this is like surgery. And every time you open up somebody it takes the corpus time to respond. You don't want to do this every year.

Speaker E: Yeah, yeah. Have you ever been laid off?

Speaker D: Well technically I've been fired from every job I've ever had but because I've only had, well the only job I've ever kept was Morgan Stanley and that's because it was just a two year analyst program. So you weren't fired, you just went back to business school. I've been fired from some of the best restaurants in Los Angeles. I've been fired from the Charthouse, Montreal Aunties, uh, Islands, uh, which was a burger change. I was fired from the restaurant at LA Fitness. I've been fired from a ton of great restaurants. I

Speaker E: wonder why.

Speaker D: And I'm not a great um. I know this is going to come as a surprise. I'm not an outstanding employee. I'm not an outstanding employee. I know that's a shocker. I mhm know that's a shocker. No, I've never, I've been

Speaker E: fired twice. One from Selling Chip Witches because I wouldn't go to the mall and sell chip witches on July 4th because I thought I'd kill myself if I had to do that and wear an outfit. And two from, from my first job at City paper in Washington D.C. i was he the guy Jack. I think I deserved it in a lot. I was too inexperienced. But he hired his friend so that was it. Thanks, Jack. That worked out well for me, actually. So.

Speaker D: Yeah. Look, I don't. Layoffs are just, uh. I think. I mean, I don't want to say I'm a fan of layoffs. And my view on layoffs is you're rapacious about the decision, and you. You are generous with terms. And I think there's a good way and a bad way, and I've hired and fired a bunch of people. And what I find with the right way to lay or fire somebody is the following. People will always make excuses for why it's not working out. And as soon as I start to hear these smells or things like he's in the wrong role or he just needs time or we haven't done a good job assimilating him, okay. It's not working. And you're not doing that person any favors by keeping them around. And the sooner you let them know it's not working. I've never been one of these people. You have to do this sometimes in public companies where security walks them out. I think that is just stupid and m. Dumb and just not kind. You sit them down and you say, it's not working here. And we can talk about why. But what I'd rather talk about is how we're going to help you find a place somewhere else.

Speaker E: Huh?

Speaker D: Where you're going to be more successful.

Speaker E: Yeah. And if

Speaker D: you're in a small company and it's doing well, you can offer to keep paying them until they find another job. You can offer to keep them their insurance, and you can try and help them find another gig. And you can sit. Hey, look, I understand you might be angry, but I don't want you to be scared. And I think people really appreciate that. They might look back and say, he shouldn't have fired me, but they weren't mean. You want to treat people. The sooner you make the decision, my attitude is, the more generous you can be in terms of severance. But I've always been like, okay, stop making excuses. This isn't working for us. And it's working. Isn't working for them. Yeah,

Speaker E: it's hard. It's difficult to fire people. It definitely is. The best scene of firing was in broadcast news when they were laying people off. Um, well, I hope

Speaker D: you die soon.

Speaker E: I hope you die

Speaker D: soon. And

Speaker E: I hope he was being. That was the finest scene I've ever seen. James Brooks,

Speaker D: wonderful movie.

Speaker E: Wonderful. James Brooks. Just amazing.

Speaker D: Holly, uh, Hunter, William Hurt.

Speaker E: Everyone used to compare me to her, by the way, in that, you know, how does it, uh, feel to think you're the smartest person in the room? And she's very.

Speaker D: He was. No, he's a. He says, it must be nice to be always be the smartest person in the world. And she's like, no, it's awful. People

Speaker E: always send that to me. They always. I actually would answer, yes, it's awful.

Speaker D: She's a wonderful movie called the Piano.

Speaker E: Oh, she's in love with Harvey Cockney. I love her. I love her so much.

Speaker D: Let's bring Holly on. Let's get Holly as a guest for Pivot.

Speaker E: Where is she? You're right, we should.

Speaker D: Let's track Holly down. We

Speaker E: love her. She was in succession, if you remember. She was. She played, um.

Speaker D: I do remember.

Speaker E: She's great wherever she goes. Um. All right, Scott, let's go on a quick break. We come back, we'll be talking about Nvidia and Meta Cozying up.

Speaker G: Ask yourself, what are your best people spending their time on right now? Expense reports, receipt chasing, month end close. That takes weeks. You become what you spend on and that's not what you're building toward. Brex is the intelligent finance platform that eliminates that work before it starts. Starts AI agents that handle the manual stuff automatically so your team can spend their time on what actually compounds. It's time to get Brex AF. Learn more at brex.com af.

Speaker F: Support for the show comes from DeleteMe. In the age of AI, we're all vulnerable to scammers using our personal data against us. Especially since it's all floating around the the Internet. Here's what you do to better protect yourself. Go to joindeleteme.com pivot and enter the code. Pivot. You'll get 20% off. Delete me. Delete Me removes your personal information from data broker sites that sell it online. I have used Deleteme for a long time. I love their dashboard. It's really smart. The problem is I find out terrible things about how my data is being abused online, including putting stuff together where I used to live, my family members, other things. Like. Like that much of it is actually inaccurate, but at the same time, it really makes me feel very vulnerable. And now since everything is so digitized, it's really important to keep on top of this stuff, take control of your data and keep your private life private. By signing up for Deleteme, you can get an engine visual plan for a little over $8 per month. The discounts get even better with a two year plan or when you enroll with your partner. Or family now at a special discount for our listeners. Get 20% off your delete Me plan when you go to join joinedeleteme.com pivot and use the promo code PIVOT at checkout. The only way to get 20 off is to go to JoinDeleteMe.com pivot and enter the code pivot at checkout. That's JoinDeleteMe.com pivot code pivot

Speaker H: support for the show comes from engine Running a small business means every dollar has to work hard. But if your team is still booking travel the old way, it's costing you more than you think. Ingen is the fastest growing travel and spend platform in the country, built specifically for businesses like yours. Book a trip in as little as 2 1/2 minutes. Earn up to 10% back on hotels, and in 2025, Enjin customers saved more than $300 million on travel with zero booking fees, no contracts and no bs. More than a thousand businesses join Enjin every every month. Join them and get $500 when your business signs up and starts traveling at enjin.com Vox.

Speaker E: Scott, we're back with more news. Nvidia and Meta are teaming up for the latest circular AI deal, which I've called the circle jerk. Uh, with Nvidia investing, uh, $3 billion in meta, part of an expanded partnership focused on the AI Agent Muse. This is tied to Meta's new plan to raise nearly $100 billion through stock offerings. Its ambitions. Chip maker AMD is also getting in on the action, investing $1 billion in Meta's equity offering. Nvidia is really spreading the money around at this point with stakes in SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic and several other companies feel Cisco Y uh, this is sort of the kingmaker in these deals. It's worth noting Nvidia is reportedly being investigated by the DOJ over its acquisition of AI open source platform Hugging Face and how it might, uh, deal might impact competitors. This feels so Cisco to me. I don't know, it feels something. Um, I mean, it's probably what one would do here, but it feels something. Something not good. Also, this incredible story came out a little while ago. US Intelligence agencies believe Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang was targeted by a Chinese spy who did business with him. According to a report in the New York Times, Trump was briefed about these findings about a year ago and chose not to do any anything with the information. Your thoughts?

Speaker D: This is okay, so just, just to review, Nvidia is investing in Meta, who is raising money in part to buy Nvidia chips, while AMD also invests in Meta's equity raise. This is literally the textbook definition of a circular financing structure. The same dollar is, is round tripping through the, through a chip maker, a cloud company, customer and cap table in one closed loop. And when you have Nvidia, uh, owning and investing, uh, owning stakes via investment in SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic simultaneously, essentially the question is the following. Is Nvidia's demand signal organic or self funded?

Speaker E: Mhm.

Speaker D: Very good

Speaker E: way to

Speaker D: put it. The metaphor is this is a company that's, that's selling shovels, it's investing in the miners, and it also owns a stake in the bank, lending money to the miners to buy the shovels. At some point, you know, if, if picks and shovels stops being the safe AI trade and starts being the whole mine. And the market looks at these deals and goes, okay, these circular deals work until they don't and then they unwind really fast. I was guilty of this back in the,

Speaker F: oh, AOL m. That was AOL's whole game. Oh

Speaker D: yeah, but even small, it happens everywhere. Even in the 90s when I was raising a ton of money for my companies, I knew all these entrepreneurs and I'd be like, oh, you're selling this software. Okay, I'll invest 50 grand and I'll buy your software package. For my small shitty business being funded by Sequoia, we were all kind of buying each other's products. Well,

Speaker E: they would call it a virtuous circle then. And I used to call it a circle jerk at that time, like I was like, okay, it's a circle, but not the kind you're thinking of. And maybe a circle jerk is virtuous for the people getting jerked. Um, but it does feel funny and it's interesting that the DOJ might be investigating them. Uh, because he has done everything, everything possible to suck up to Trump Jensen Huang.

Speaker D: He was smart,

Speaker E: but you know what

Speaker D: it feels like. Remember? Did you ever see that chart of every crypto company that, uh. I know what you're talking

Speaker E: about.

Speaker D: Stan Bankman Frieda invested in at fdx. It felt like he owned. It felt like he was financing the entire sector.

Speaker E: Yeah, exactly. So how does it go wrong? Or how does it go right? Let's be fair.

Speaker D: Well, how it goes right is that Anthropic keeps, which was up, uh, its revenues were up 14x in the first half. And to be fair, um, despite all the critics you're going to hear on property markets of the AI trade, if they can keep anything even if that growth gets cut in half. They do look to be recognizing scale relative to capex. This could be a company that's doing 200 billion in annual revenue by 28. The

Speaker E: Google. It's the Google. Yeah.

Speaker D: And at uh, 10 times. If it goes out at 2 trillion, 10 times revenue just doesn't seem that, you know, that seems cheap compared to some other stuff.

Speaker E: It's the Google. It's what the Yahoo had a stake in Google if you remember did investments in Google because of M Lots because it was. Google was one of its vendors. It just was one of those similar things.

Speaker D: So what could go right as it maintains its current growth, it's able to reflect margins, it's able to show scale around its capex or Anthropic is already the second greatest revenue per employee employee in the world. It went from 1.4 million to 6 million per employee and it's second only to Nvidia. And I'll probably pass Nvidia if it continues to scale like this. You're essentially getting. It's growing much faster than Nvidia, it's growing much faster than SpaceX and you're probably going to. In this IPO. I'm actually, when I read the S1 I was actually quite bullish, distinctive, an existential threat or some huge scandal. I think what they're going to be able to honestly say is you're getting greater growth with us than Nvidia or SpaceX at a much lower multiple. I think that'll be very, very attractive to the public markets. But how this unwinds is one of these guys. If Nvidia's demand signal starts to look really, really bullshit and really artificial and propped up and all of a sudden Nvidia's stock starts going down and Nvidia no longer feels like it can finance these companies. The whole thing just unwinds. It's like pulling on a string. Right? The whole thing unwinds really fast.

Speaker E: Yeah. You mean if they get one win like an anthropic, it could be fine. Right. Like that's. But I don't think that helps Nvidia uh, necessarily it has got to.

Speaker D: Well, it's the Internet again. I mean everyone. This will correct at some point. That's just a natural part of these tech cycles. Right. The railroads did transform the United States. The technology was transformative. There were tons of bankruptcies along the way. The Internet did transform the United States economy. Amazon, uh, and Cisco lost 92% of their value. And then one of them came back to go up 40th. So the technology and many of these companies will survive the corrections. The question is how severe is the V down? And then the hard part is when does it happen? And none of us know. And in the meantime. And I had dinner with Barry Ritholtz the other night from when the Economist perfectly called the crash of the dot com bubble. They did it in 97. They were early. The NASDAQ doubled from there. So again I always go to the same thing. If you're an investor, always be in the market. But always, especially if you're a little bit older, try and be diversified.

Speaker E: Yeah. So you know where it's going. One of the things that worries me is they're all, all of these companies have three big customers and that's it. Right. That take care of most of their thing. And so that's the, that's the worry. I have concentration and it feels very. And Nvidia is right in the middle of it anyway. We'll see where it goes. But it's going to. Something's going to break at some point. Former, uh, Yahoo CEO Mercer Mare is facing backlash after revealing she used her new AI assistant Dazzle to come up with three things that make her 10 year old daughter special. Mehra later said she was not relying on AI to explain her child, but rather testing the app's abilities. Dazzle. It was a really bad quote. Dazzle uses a person's camera roll to learn about their life and preferences. I have a long history with Marissa. Uh, I was pretty tough on our CEO Yahoo, which she did a terrible job at. I'll say she was former Google executive. Um, and she's sort of trying to, you know, make her differentiation in this AI race. She's tried a bunch of companies that haven't really worked out since leaving Yahoo. But um, uh, I just want to know if uh, you are an AI chatbot, what would you say the three most special things about me are? You can't think. You can't. Oh God. Just call Claude.

Speaker D: Yeah, yeah. The three most spe. I, you know, I would just leave it at. You're just special. Let's leave it there. You're just special. You're our little special podcast child. Child. You're very special.

Speaker E: This was, it was really. She should not have said the things she said. Honestly, sometimes she's very not self aware. I'm not so sure this was so fair. Um, I'm not a fan of Marissa's but I have to say I think if you know her, she's she. She has sometimes awkwardly communicates, I would say. And this was a real. This is a corker of bad communications and a piece she probably thought was going to be positive about her efforts.

Speaker D: Marissa was in over her head as CEO of Yahoo. It was the total pump and dump. I mean, back Dan Loeb took a big stake, managed to get a guy fired for saying he minored in computer science when he didn't, which I thought was ridiculous, and then managed to position her. He

Speaker E: lied about. Let me be clear. I wrote some of those stories. He lied about a lot of stuff. He was un.

Speaker D: But wasn't the reason he was fired because

Speaker E: he just constantly wasn't telling m the truth on a number. Oh,

Speaker D: is that right? I forgot his name. I thought

Speaker E: Scott something. Scott.

Speaker D: There you go.

Speaker E: I feel like Scott, um, was his name.

Speaker D: And then she was painted as some sort of heroic.

Speaker E: Anyone who knew her superhero wasn't gonna be the case.

Speaker D: And, uh, she almost blew the tax status and the Japanese stake. Um, she managed, I think, to cut EBITDA revenue, uh, by 20% EBITDA in half. And meanwhile walked away, I think with close to a quarter of a billion dollars, which today almost seems quaint.

Speaker E: Yeah. Remember Enrique? She hired the sales guy.

Speaker D: Oh, and fired him seven months later. But he had negotiated and she had agreed to $110 million buy.

Speaker E: He did. Well, he went there for

Speaker D: seven months, got fired and walked away with 110 million or something.

Speaker E: Yeah, I don't remember that whole time. I wrote a lot of stories about young, uh, uh, not just her, but other CEOs, but nonetheless. Look, she made a stupid quote.

Speaker D: She seems like a nice lady. I hope she does well. But with stuff around your kids and AI.

Speaker E: Yeah. You have to keep it.

Speaker D: I think it's a little bit tone deaf because people are expecting those kinds of observations about your kid to come from you and not, uh, it just sort of feels. It feels uncomfortable. Like, uh, Claude, please feed my child. Or

Speaker E: do the story. You saw that story thing. Make a story in my voice so I can have the story read by AI to my child in my voice. There was one posting like that. Tech people shouldn't talk about AI in children ever.

Speaker D: I agree.

Speaker E: Ever. It's not just Marissa. There's a lot. Most people expect me to be very critical, but I think she just said something stupid. Knowing her, I have a feeling I know what she was going for. Uh, she has an awkward communication style and, um, just. Just tech people don't talk about how AI is great for our kids. When most people are super worried about it, just, that's not a great way to sell it. Anyway, uh, one more quick break. We'll be back for predictions.

Speaker H: Support for

Speaker I: today's

Speaker H: episode comes from

Speaker I: Delta, official airline of the National Women's Summer Soccer League. Traveling is

Speaker H: basically

Speaker I: magic. It

Speaker H: creates

Speaker I: opportunities. It fosters understanding. It expands horizons. It

Speaker H: connects

Speaker I: people and communities

Speaker H: to each other and to their own

Speaker I: potential.

Speaker H: Those are the values that drive Delta. With up to 5,500 daily Delta and Delta connection flights to more than 300 destinations on six continents, Delta is committed to helping you expand, explore your world. Whatever gives you the travel

Speaker I: bug,

Speaker H: Delta is here to help you get there. Visit delta.com for more info. Delta. Wherever the journey takes

Speaker I: you.

Speaker E: Running a business shouldn't feel like surviving a software group project. One app for accounting, another for inventory, another for sales, and somehow none of them talk to each other. That's where Odoo comes in. An all in one business business management software that brings every part of your business together from sales and accounting to inventory and marketing, all in one powerful platform. No messy integrations, no bouncing between tabs, and best of all, no spreadsheets. Stop managing software and start managing your business with one unified system. Try for free today@, uh, odoo.com Vox that's O-O-O.com

Speaker J: Vox

Speaker K: support for the show comes from Bill. When it comes to managing money, forget the hype and look for look at results. Bill has a trillion dollars of secure payments powering their bill pay tools. Instead of just moving money, Bill is powering the financial operations of nearly half a million customers. So stop the guesswork and start scaling with the proven choice. Ready to talk with an expert? Visit bill.comproven to get started and grab a $150 gift card as a thank you. Terms and conditions applied. See offer page for details.

Speaker E: Okay, Scott, let's hear a, uh, prediction.

Speaker D: I think in one story we didn't talk about that. We probably should have Instagram, uh, or Meta announced a new program called Features which will now allow creators to upload, uh, up to 90, uh, minute long videos to their platform. This is obviously they look at the success and shareholder value that YouTube is driving and Mark's like, no, I want some of that. And they want to challenge their long form dominance online. And I think what they sense is that one that was challenging their dominance. Netflix has its own problems and so I think they see an opportunity. And also they have 3 billion daily active users. And talking about AI, I would argue that the best use of AI right now is Meta and video. I just find it frighteningly addictive. Um, so

Speaker E: you mean on Instagram or on throughout the service?

Speaker D: I find Instagram reels.

Speaker E: Yeah, I know you love

Speaker D: them. I feel like it's turning my brain inside out.

Speaker E: Right, yeah.

Speaker D: That it. Absolutely. It's frightening to me how on point the next video is going to be.

Speaker E: Yep, I agree, I agree.

Speaker D: I completely agree. Uh, I don't think people realize just how many millions of data points in human psychology and behavioral psychology they are measuring a billion times a second to try and keep, keep you on that screen for just a second longer every day. So currently and I think what you're going to hide. So my prediction is boring. By the end of next year, Nielsen will be reporting streaming data on Meta. And just in the past couple of months, Meta has begun rolling out its uh, Instagram app for the smart tv, which will begin short form reels and now long form features in the living room. In sum, Instagram's coming for the TV and for streaming media. What's interesting is they're not paying people. I think YouTube pays about 50% of its revenue out to creators. So the question is, and I tasked my team with figuring this out, I'm like, is this a top of the funnel vehicle? Because for the next 90 to 180 days, if you want to get into features, you should do it now because they'll juice the algorithm to display so

Speaker E: you'll be popular.

Speaker D: Yeah,

Speaker E: they're in a bit of a beef with publishers. They try to put these terms where everything you put in there they have rights to scrape. There's a big fight going on and uh, they've slowed down their rollout of these. So just keep in mind they're always looking to steal your shit. Everybody that you're putting in there. And so they're in the midst of a big fight with people. And again they were going to put these rules in place for what you uploaded and there was a lot of pushback from all manner of content creators, uh, especially professional ones of taking your stuff.

Speaker D: But this is, there's just no getting around it. This puts more pressure on the streamers, including Netflix. Streamers now won't just be competing with you YouTube over the television, they're going to be competing with meta.

Speaker E: But content creators do not love like if you put it on Netflix, you don't expect them to steal your shit. Expect Facebook to steal your shit in some way that will help them. That's, it's a, it's a different relationship. It should make you pause.

Speaker D: That's always been true of Meta. And every day more and more people decide to upload their content.

Speaker E: Right, I get it. But that they're in the midst of that controversy too but. So you think they're going to keep up. I'll tell you one thing about YouTube and I just love your observation is I agree Reels, you go from thing to thing and it's really a addictive in a good way. Like in a weird good way. I find uh, YouTube as popular as is and I get why it's popular. And once you figure out grok the way it works, it's great for you. But it's rather confusing still. It's never. And ah, I've talked this about the. To the CEOs of YouTube over the many years. I just. It's hard to go like it's hard to organize it. It doesn't seem organized, it seems random as shit. And I don't get as much. Um, it's not as Meta does a great job at organizing. I don't know how else to put it, like programming or something, whatever you might call it.

Speaker D: I just want to look but just. It'll be interesting to revisit the following chart in a year when Meta, uh, you know what is one of the best operating companies in the world with a ton of content. And they always figure out a way to get creators to give them their content for free. But right now, if you look at the share of video or TV streaming is now half. Cable is 19%, broadcast is 18%, others 14%. And now let's look at the streaming market. The big switch here is that Netflix was near double digits and YouTube is low double digits. Now YouTube is 16% and Netflix is 8. YouTube has twice the watch time of Netflix. Then after Netflix at 8% it drops down to 5 at Disney 4 for Amazon Prime. This is interesting. 3% from Roku, which was just acquired by News Corp. Correct. Or Fox

Speaker E: News Corp. Well, so far it's under Investigation,

Speaker D: under review. 2.3% for Paramount+1. I wasn't expecting to see 2% for Tubi. By the way, Tubi has greater share of streaming than peacock at 1.6%, much lower than I had thought. 1.4% for Warner Brothers Discovery. So HBO punches above its weight class, but still sort of artisanal. The real question is when all of a sudden Meta's in this game now, who are they going to take share from? And also I'm just fascinated to try and figure out what is the incentive Right. And. And I find I'm spending more time on YouTube. I'm watching east of Eden on Netflix right now, which I think is just fantastic. Um, but when Meta shows up, uh, uh, the question I have is I think it's going to be very disruptive here. I'm just trying to figure out who they're going to take share from.

Speaker E: So give me very quick, who do you think? If you had to pick right now, just top of your head. YouTube.

Speaker D: They're coming for YouTube. That's who they're coming after. The thing about momentum, momentum creates its own momentum. And I think Netflix has probably got further to fall right now because the momentum's just so bad for them. I do think they're going to come back. I've even been looking at the stock because I just think the management team is so strong there. But Zuckerberg basically looked at Snap and said, okay, don't kill them, but injure them. We want to keep them alive, but make them sort of irrelevant. Irrelevant. I think he's looking at YouTube and is like, okay, girlfriend, I'm coming for you now. And I have such custody of the consumer and people. The bottom line is people are using mostly YouTube. And I actually, I don't know this. My thesis is

Speaker E: my kids are.

Speaker D: People are using YouTube on a computer. And the flow of attentions, the flow of the river of attention is flowing massively downstream to smaller and smaller screens. I am consuming more and more content on. On my phone and less and less content on my tv.

Speaker E: Did you get the duo? Speaking of.

Speaker D: I will, though. I heard you bought one. No,

Speaker E: I did, and now I canceled it because I kept reading all the reviews. I'm like, I may rebuy it again. I don't know.

Speaker D: I mean, it's not till January,

Speaker E: so I got some time. So

Speaker D: I think it looks really cool.

Speaker E: It does. But various people say I just. I keep. I should stop reading reviews and just get it, because I'll probably get it. Um, but I don't want a bad experience. Some people think it's real clunky, but others don't. I probably will get it anyway. We want to hear from you. Send us your questions about business, tech, or whatever's on your mind. Go to to nymag.com pivot submit a question for the show, or call 85551 pivot. Okay, that's the show. Thanks for listening to Pivot. Be sure to like and subscribe to our YouTube channel. And, uh, also sign up for pivot postivtshow.com. and just a programming note will be in your feed a little later on Tuesday. Cause that episode will be freshly recorded live. On Monday night. Scott and I will be in New York.

Speaker D: Uh,

Speaker E: we're always worth the wait. I'm very excited about my week with Scott. We have a good time. We discuss things, we

Speaker D: do

Speaker E: braid each other's hair. We have nice time. We spend a lot of time together. But we really like it. It's really fun. Um, and we've got some great guests. So, you know, if you're, if you're in any of the cities we're in, please come and say hi to us. We'd love to see you.

Speaker D: That's true. Today's show is produced by Lara Naiman, Zoe Marcus, Taylor Griffin and Todd Wiseman. Ernie and her Todd engineered this episode. Thanks also to Drew Burrows, Ms. Savera and Dan Shalon. Nishat Kurwa is Voxamed as executive producer of podcasts. Make sure to follow Pivot on your favorite podcast platform. Thanks. Thanks for listening to Pivot from Vox Media. We'll be back next week for another breakdown of all things tech and business care. I will see you in New York.

Speaker E: Running a business shouldn't feel like surviving a software group project. One app for accounting, another for inventory, another for sales, and somehow none of them talk to each other. That's where where Odoo comes in. An all in one business management software that brings every part of your business together from sales and accounting to inventory and marketing, all in one powerful platform. No messy integrations, no bouncing between tabs, and best of all, no spreadsheets. Stop managing software and start managing your business with one unified system. Try for free today at, uh, odoo.com Vox that's O-O-O.com Vox

Speaker L: why can't we get AI to production? Our competitors are already. How do we keep data secure? AWS AI cuts through the noise with ready to use agents and the broadest set of AI tools. Stop overthinking, Start building. AWS AI

Speaker G: is how.

Speaker L: Ryan

Speaker M: Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. I don't know if you knew this, but anyone can get the same Premium Wireless for $15 a month plan that I've been enjoying. It's not just for celebrities. So do like I did and have one of your assistant's assistants switch you to Mint Mobile today. I'm told it's super easy to do@mintmobile.com Switch

Speaker F: upfront payment of $45 for 3 month plan equivalent to $15 per month required intro rate first 3 months only then full price plan options available, taxes

Speaker N: and fees, extra

Speaker F: fee,

Speaker N: full terms@mintmobile.com.

More from Pivot

All episodes →
  • Comcast Splits, OpenAI Weighs IPO Delay, and Buttigieg Targeted71 / 100
All Pivot episodes →