The B2B Podcast Index
Lean By Design

0304. When Data Exists but No One Sees the Full Picture

Lean By Design · 2026-04-01 · 49 min

Substance score

27 / 100

Five dimensions, 20 points each

Insight Density8 / 20
Originality5 / 20
Guest Caliber4 / 20
Specificity & Evidence5 / 20
Conversational Craft5 / 20

What our scoring noted

Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.

Insight Density

8 / 20

The episode circles the same core observation - disconnected systems create bad decisions - for nearly 50 minutes with limited new ideas introduced after the first 10. There is one genuinely practical heuristic (sit in leadership meetings to harvest recurring questions, then build dashboards around those eight questions) but the rest is repetition dressed in slight variations.

Let me sit in one of your meetings for about two or three meetings. Okay, here's the eight questions that keep coming up. Let's just build things that answer those questions so that we start to get better questions.
AI is not gonna help craft the narrative of your story if your characters have different names than what in one group versus another.

Originality

5 / 20

The core thesis - data silos are bad, architect your data flows, garbage in garbage out - is entirely conventional, and the hosts explicitly acknowledge one of their central lines is a cliché they've 'heard a thousand times.' The Naval Ravikant quote is loosely grafted onto the topic without developing a genuinely fresh angle.

there's a good uh quote from his name is Naval Ravakant...success, which is it's basically two things getting what you want and wanting the right things
garbage in, garbage out. And that is it's very true in a lot of scenarios.

Guest Caliber

4 / 20

There is no external guest - this is a two-host format where both speakers appear to be consultants in pharma/biotech operations, but neither their seniority, specific company histories, nor scale of prior work is established in the transcript. The episode functions as a consultancy marketing vehicle rather than a practitioner knowledge-transfer session.

we have taken this whole topic that we've talked about today, and we've put it into one of our risk assessments to help people identify where is their biggest issue.
we invite you to explore our operational risk assessments that are these are hybrid engagements where you'll actually work directly with Lawrence and I

Specificity & Evidence

5 / 20

The discussion is almost entirely illustrative and hypothetical - 'do I need five scientists or do I need 50?' is the most concrete number offered. No named client companies, no real case studies, no measured outcomes, and tool-name-dropping (Monday, Trello, Smartsheet, Notion) substitutes for actual evidence throughout.

do I need five scientists or do I need 50? I don't I don't know because the information that you provided me on the these couple of assets are telling me this thing
one hour of Sally is not equivalent to one hour of Bob because Sally is way more adept at accessing all the information.

Conversational Craft

5 / 20

As a co-host format with no guest, there is no interviewing dynamic to evaluate, and within the dialogue the hosts almost never challenge each other - responses are overwhelmingly affirmative ('You nailed it. Absolutely.'). There is no productive friction, no probing follow-up, and the turn-taking is largely each host restating the prior speaker's point with slightly different metaphors.

You nailed it. Absolutely.
Is it enabling the dysfunction? I think a lot of us will say, yes, it is definitely adding to that dysfunction.

Conversation analysis

Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the verbal tics along the way.

Filler words

you know124so69like59right47uh32actually22um16sort of12I mean4kind of4basically1

Episode notes

Send us Fan Mail Most organizations have data. Systems are in place, dashboards exist, and reports are generated. Yet when it comes to making decisions, teams still struggle to see the full picture. In this episode of Lean by Design , Oscar Gonzalez and Lawrence Wong explore why fragmented data systems and disconnected architectures create more confusion than clarity. Despite heavy investment in digital tools, organizations often operate with incomplete or inconsistent views of reality - leading to delays, misalignment, and poor decision-making. The conversation reframes a common assumption: the issue isn’t a lack of data - it’s the lack of a coherent structure that allows data to flow, connect, and create shared understanding across teams. Oscar and Lawrence unpack how data silos, inconsistent definitions, and weak system integration quietly undermine operational efficiency. They also explore why simply adding more tools or even AI - doesn’t solve the problem if the underlying data foundation is fragmented. This episode is not about technology selection or architecture frameworks.

Full transcript

49 min

Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.

1 00:01:01,149 - > 00:01:01,710 SPEAKER_00: Here we are. 2 00:01:01,869 - > 00:01:05,549 This will be uh we're gonna take a little break after this 3 00:01:05,549 - > 00:01:10,829 episode, but I think we have an important topic today that we um 4 00:01:11,390 - > 00:01:14,590 we don't spend enough time thinking about when we are 5 00:01:14,590 - > 00:01:19,310 developing systems within our organizations, when we are 6 00:01:19,789 - > 00:01:26,349 bringing in new technology, we're bringing in new uh ways of 7 00:01:26,349 - > 00:01:26,990 working. 8 00:01:27,549 - > 00:01:32,030 And you know, this can look like you know, from the scientific 9 00:01:32,030 - > 00:01:36,750 side of like benching and and rippling, and you have other 10 00:01:36,990 - > 00:01:40,829 systems that pull out articles, and you have other systems for 11 00:01:40,829 - > 00:01:44,750 project management, and you have other systems to manage legal, 12 00:01:45,069 - > 00:01:48,829 other systems to manage drug dispensation and and clinical 13 00:01:48,829 - > 00:01:49,310 trials. 14 00:01:49,549 - > 00:01:50,109 There's a lot. 15 00:01:50,270 - > 00:01:54,509 There's a lot of software that's available, and when we pull 16 00:01:54,509 - > 00:01:59,229 these things in and we fail to connect them or even see how 17 00:01:59,229 - > 00:02:04,109 they can be connected, we start to start to struggle in seeing 18 00:02:04,270 - > 00:02:07,389 what is what is the sum of all that we're doing. 19 00:02:08,110 - > 00:02:12,349 What are the gaps that we need support? 20 00:02:13,229 - > 00:02:17,469 We're talking about our digital operations and data flow, how 21 00:02:17,710 - > 00:02:22,270 information flows from one space into another, how we receive it, 22 00:02:22,909 - > 00:02:28,349 how we bring context together to deliver reports to leadership. 23 00:02:28,590 - > 00:02:33,710 So a huge, you know, I think in 2026 it's huge for us to think 24 00:02:34,349 - > 00:02:38,270 more critically about how we are doing these things in our 25 00:02:38,270 - > 00:02:42,349 organizations and within our teams, and the impact of 26 00:02:42,669 - > 00:02:48,830 ignoring it or just going on our own sort of adventure to uh, you 27 00:02:48,830 - > 00:02:51,629 know, jump from one system to another. 28 00:02:51,870 - > 00:02:57,069 I feel like we've been at, you know, such an eye-opening 29 00:02:57,069 - > 00:03:02,349 junction here from our early days in pharma, in biotech, uh, 30 00:03:02,430 - > 00:03:06,349 to where we are now where we're integrating AI and we're using 31 00:03:06,349 - > 00:03:11,949 agents and bots to help complete tasks, et cetera, that sort of 32 00:03:11,949 - > 00:03:15,709 create just another avenue where data can sit. 33 00:03:15,870 - > 00:03:16,909 Well, let's talk about that today. 34 00:03:17,150 - > 00:03:19,389 SPEAKER_01: Yeah, I think there's a lot of tools out there 35 00:03:19,389 - > 00:03:24,590 now that you can leverage that not only help you analyze the 36 00:03:24,590 - > 00:03:27,789 data and make decisions, but it actually sits on top of those 37 00:03:27,789 - > 00:03:31,150 applications so that you can actually gather more insight 38 00:03:31,150 - > 00:03:33,150 across multiple applications, right? 39 00:03:33,389 - > 00:03:36,430 So I I think we used to have even when we started in the 40 00:03:36,430 - > 00:03:39,389 industry, you certain data types would be siloed and you couldn't 41 00:03:39,469 - > 00:03:43,629 like move them essentially, and you'd have to maybe download you 42 00:03:43,629 - > 00:03:47,870 know data from this thing and then put it into a uh a Google 43 00:03:47,870 - > 00:03:52,349 Drive or OneDrive folder and then share point, SharePoint, 44 00:03:52,509 - > 00:03:54,590 whatever it is, and and you know, all these different data 45 00:03:54,590 - > 00:03:57,150 types and try to make sense of what it is that you're trying to 46 00:03:57,150 - > 00:03:57,310 do. 47 00:03:57,469 - > 00:04:01,469 But I think now, like you said, we have all these like different 48 00:04:01,469 - > 00:04:04,430 terminology and and tools that we can use, like a data lake 49 00:04:04,590 - > 00:04:06,909 where you can put different data types in there and then you can 50 00:04:06,909 - > 00:04:08,989 actually pull out of it to create the things that you need 51 00:04:08,989 - > 00:04:09,229 to do. 52 00:04:09,389 - > 00:04:14,509 But all of those fancy tools are they're only good if you're, I 53 00:04:14,509 - > 00:04:17,230 guess, you know, like we were saying, digital operations. 54 00:04:17,389 - > 00:04:20,750 It's it's really the the data flow and the architecture of how 55 00:04:20,750 - > 00:04:23,629 those pathways are created, so you can actually do those 56 00:04:23,629 - > 00:04:24,189 things. 57 00:04:24,430 - > 00:04:28,269 If you don't have that set up, you cannot harness the full 58 00:04:28,269 - > 00:04:30,910 capability of all the tools that we have currently. 59 00:04:31,069 - > 00:04:35,870 SPEAKER_00: So I think there's you hanging your hat on that 60 00:04:37,069 - > 00:04:40,590 just because you have a lot of data does not mean that you can 61 00:04:40,590 - > 00:04:43,709 just layer something on top and it'll tell you what's happening. 62 00:04:44,430 - > 00:04:44,750 SPEAKER_01: Yeah. 63 00:04:44,910 - > 00:04:50,430 If if you can't connect it, then how do you uh how do you make 64 00:04:50,430 - > 00:04:51,389 sense of it, right? 65 00:04:51,629 - > 00:04:56,509 And I think it's it's rare in in 2026 where you're only making 66 00:04:56,509 - > 00:04:59,389 decisions for your team or your business based on one 67 00:04:59,389 - > 00:04:59,870 application. 68 00:05:00,110 - > 00:05:02,750 The business is so much more complicated these days that you 69 00:05:02,750 - > 00:05:05,550 know you'd have to look at, especially in the realm of 70 00:05:05,550 - > 00:05:08,670 facilities management, you know, we're looking at not only the 71 00:05:08,829 - > 00:05:13,550 maintenance data for how you manage specific buildings or 72 00:05:13,870 - > 00:05:17,469 pieces of equipment, but you're also looking at the utilization 73 00:05:17,469 - > 00:05:19,469 of the equipment itself, right? 74 00:05:19,790 - > 00:05:22,990 Very every year companies go through this exercise where they 75 00:05:22,990 - > 00:05:26,430 have to allocate uh funding for purchasing new equipment. 76 00:05:26,829 - > 00:05:30,269 And it used to be the case where you would justify, hey, I have a 77 00:05:30,269 - > 00:05:33,230 business case, like you know, I have so-and-so change in the 78 00:05:33,230 - > 00:05:36,430 pipeline, and so we need to buy additional equipment to increase 79 00:05:36,430 - > 00:05:37,310 our capacity. 80 00:05:37,709 - > 00:05:41,149 But where are they coming up with the projections on what the 81 00:05:41,149 - > 00:05:42,670 current capacity is, right? 82 00:05:42,750 - > 00:05:44,750 If you don't have the data to tell you. 83 00:05:44,990 - > 00:05:47,949 And so you'd have to, you know, do some calculations in one 84 00:05:47,949 - > 00:05:50,110 system and then move it over to the other, then you'd have to go 85 00:05:50,110 - > 00:05:52,589 to your maintenance system, pull more data on that. 86 00:05:52,750 - > 00:05:55,069 And so that's just a very simple use case. 87 00:05:55,149 - > 00:05:58,029 That's not even considering any of the things that you have in 88 00:05:58,029 - > 00:05:59,629 your quality management system. 89 00:05:59,870 - > 00:06:03,550 Like if you have any deviations and problems that come up that 90 00:06:03,550 - > 00:06:06,750 are actually product impacting, you might want to take a look at 91 00:06:06,750 - > 00:06:09,069 that and decide, yeah, let's not buy that piece of equipment 92 00:06:09,069 - > 00:06:10,349 anymore because it sucks. 93 00:06:12,110 - > 00:06:14,430 SPEAKER_00: We've had to repair it every six months, you know, 94 00:06:14,589 - > 00:06:15,310 big repairs. 95 00:06:15,469 - > 00:06:17,870 Like that's that's you know, and there's a lot of options out 96 00:06:17,870 - > 00:06:17,949 there. 97 00:06:18,110 - > 00:06:18,829 That's exactly right. 98 00:06:18,990 - > 00:06:22,750 I think that's a great example of you know how you can use that 99 00:06:22,750 - > 00:06:25,709 data to better inform those future decisions. 100 00:06:25,870 - > 00:06:29,310 And, you know, you mentioned I I I've also heard the terms, you 101 00:06:29,310 - > 00:06:32,269 know, such as the data late, data warehouse. 102 00:06:32,509 - > 00:06:36,430 I think now where we're finding ourselves is sort of in this, 103 00:06:36,670 - > 00:06:40,029 you know, persona of we have plenty of data, we're collecting 104 00:06:40,029 - > 00:06:43,149 stuff all the time, we have slides everywhere, but we are 105 00:06:43,149 - > 00:06:47,149 struggling to create a shared picture of what's happening with 106 00:06:47,149 - > 00:06:50,670 our projects, what's happening with our organization, how our 107 00:06:50,670 - > 00:06:54,509 resources are actually being allocated, you know, and some 108 00:06:54,509 - > 00:06:57,870 folks uh, you know, they they make the uh the attempt to say, 109 00:06:58,029 - > 00:07:02,189 let's I used to have to put by project how what percentage of 110 00:07:02,189 - > 00:07:02,430 time. 111 00:07:02,589 - > 00:07:05,230 And that doesn't have anything to do with how many hours or 112 00:07:05,230 - > 00:07:07,709 what part of the project was it, you know, the project was. 113 00:07:07,870 - > 00:07:09,310 And all of these things matter. 114 00:07:09,389 - > 00:07:13,389 Like you said, the complexity of the of the projects are just 115 00:07:13,389 - > 00:07:18,269 increasing, you know, now and and it's not just because of the 116 00:07:18,269 - > 00:07:20,990 science that we're doing, it's also because of the guardrails 117 00:07:21,069 - > 00:07:23,709 that we have to put on some of these, you know, new 118 00:07:23,709 - > 00:07:27,550 technologies or new therapies that, you know, may not have 119 00:07:27,550 - > 00:07:29,550 precedent, you know, from the past. 120 00:07:29,629 - > 00:07:32,110 So we're sort of developing those things as we go. 121 00:07:32,269 - > 00:07:36,189 So, you know, we're we're we're really we've talked about why 122 00:07:36,189 - > 00:07:39,469 it's important and why we care about data flow and digital 123 00:07:39,469 - > 00:07:42,670 operations, and we're sort of bucketing a lot of these things 124 00:07:42,670 - > 00:07:47,790 that I think many of us have experienced where there's this 125 00:07:47,790 - > 00:07:53,310 abundance of information, but we don't know what's real, we don't 126 00:07:53,310 - > 00:07:54,670 know what the source is. 127 00:07:54,829 - > 00:07:58,430 Sometimes we don't even know who provided it, who came up with 128 00:07:58,430 - > 00:07:59,069 this numbers. 129 00:07:59,230 - > 00:08:02,990 How did it, how did it come to be that this becomes now our 130 00:08:02,990 - > 00:08:03,870 benchmark? 131 00:08:04,029 - > 00:08:04,990 Who created that? 132 00:08:05,149 - > 00:08:06,430 Was it somebody from this group? 133 00:08:06,589 - > 00:08:07,949 Was it somebody from a different group? 134 00:08:08,110 - > 00:08:09,709 Was there an analysis that was done? 135 00:08:09,870 - > 00:08:13,949 And it creates this sort of ambiguous feeling in terms of 136 00:08:13,949 - > 00:08:15,469 the data that you're collecting. 137 00:08:15,629 - > 00:08:19,230 Well, we're just going through the motions and then we just 138 00:08:19,230 - > 00:08:21,629 respond based on what leadership is asking for. 139 00:08:21,790 - > 00:08:23,870 Then we try to find out what it is. 140 00:08:24,189 - > 00:08:28,189 But I think the power and the way that we can leverage this 141 00:08:28,189 - > 00:08:32,590 data is anticipating what those questions are and developing 142 00:08:32,590 - > 00:08:35,389 that structure, that architecture to say these are 143 00:08:35,389 - > 00:08:38,190 the things that are most important to this organization. 144 00:08:38,590 - > 00:08:42,190 Probably has something to do with funding, probably has 145 00:08:42,190 - > 00:08:46,269 something to do with timing, how long things take, you know, the 146 00:08:46,269 - > 00:08:47,310 phase of development. 147 00:08:47,550 - > 00:08:50,909 Where are these projects or where, you know, are you 148 00:08:50,909 - > 00:08:52,110 starting a new facility? 149 00:08:52,269 - > 00:08:53,790 Are you maintaining a new facility? 150 00:08:53,950 - > 00:08:55,230 Are you moving a new facility? 151 00:08:55,389 - > 00:08:57,870 Are you integrating new, you know, new equipment? 152 00:08:57,950 - > 00:09:01,310 You know, how are all these things going to flow as opposed 153 00:09:01,310 - > 00:09:03,310 to, well, we're just gonna set it over there and then it'll 154 00:09:03,310 - > 00:09:05,070 just have a dedicated computer? 155 00:09:05,470 - > 00:09:08,909 I mean, that that's great, but then when you try to, you know, 156 00:09:08,990 - > 00:09:12,509 collect the data to develop insights, you're gonna find that 157 00:09:12,509 - > 00:09:15,550 you're you're gonna end up with a real struggle because what 158 00:09:15,550 - > 00:09:20,590 ends up happening is these metrics that we really covet are 159 00:09:20,590 - > 00:09:21,470 in silos. 160 00:09:21,710 - > 00:09:25,230 Well, that data is just in that computer that's not connected, 161 00:09:25,310 - > 00:09:28,190 uh, you know, any of our other digital spaces. 162 00:09:28,350 - > 00:09:33,950 We'll find conflicting reports where you know you might have 163 00:09:33,950 - > 00:09:35,070 timing shifts. 164 00:09:35,230 - > 00:09:38,830 Well, the research group says that this is gonna take about 165 00:09:38,830 - > 00:09:42,990 this long, but we got things from the portfolio team that it 166 00:09:42,990 - > 00:09:44,590 should be six months longer than that. 167 00:09:44,750 - > 00:09:46,590 Like, how are we so far apart? 168 00:09:46,830 - > 00:09:49,230 Well, the data that we're working with is not the same 169 00:09:49,230 - > 00:09:51,790 data that we're, you know, we don't have the same baseline 170 00:09:51,790 - > 00:09:54,830 here of information to move forward. 171 00:09:55,070 - > 00:09:57,310 And it continues to cycle. 172 00:09:57,390 - > 00:10:00,670 And I'm sure you've been in a position where you know you get 173 00:10:00,670 - > 00:10:04,590 a request and it becomes leadership getting a request 174 00:10:04,590 - > 00:10:07,150 from that group, you know, sending a request to that group, 175 00:10:07,550 - > 00:10:11,230 sending another one to, you know, this team here, and 176 00:10:11,230 - > 00:10:14,830 sending another one to, you know, the the whatever the 177 00:10:14,830 - > 00:10:17,310 portfolio of the project management team over here. 178 00:10:17,629 - > 00:10:22,430 And they're spending the time to collate what am I trying to see 179 00:10:22,430 - > 00:10:22,670 here? 180 00:10:23,550 - > 00:10:28,990 You know, we are in an age where you know knowledge, you know, 181 00:10:29,150 - > 00:10:30,110 knowledge is power. 182 00:10:30,190 - > 00:10:35,310 We talk that much is is said, but the data cannot become 183 00:10:35,310 - > 00:10:37,950 knowledge if we can't create any context out of it. 184 00:10:38,190 - > 00:10:41,710 So even though we've done a lot of experiments, we've done a lot 185 00:10:41,710 - > 00:10:45,629 of tracking, we've done a lot of collating of the information and 186 00:10:45,629 - > 00:10:50,830 the data that we're producing, if you're not creating the flow, 187 00:10:51,070 - > 00:10:53,230 it becomes challenging. 188 00:10:53,550 - > 00:10:57,790 It becomes an arduous task that you have to give probably four 189 00:10:57,790 - > 00:11:04,430 or five people that are not there to compile, to synthesize, 190 00:11:04,830 - > 00:11:06,670 you know, all day, every day. 191 00:11:06,750 - > 00:11:09,230 They're probably running from one meeting to the next, and you 192 00:11:09,230 - > 00:11:12,110 start to find delays and you start to create, you start to 193 00:11:12,110 - > 00:11:17,470 make decisions that are not based on the data that you have. 194 00:11:17,710 - > 00:11:21,790 It's based on a piece of data that people could see. 195 00:11:22,190 - > 00:11:24,030 And that's when we start to have problems. 196 00:11:24,190 - > 00:11:26,750 That's when we start to, you know, our timeline slow down, 197 00:11:26,830 - > 00:11:30,830 our budgets start to wither away, the you know, onboarding 198 00:11:30,830 - > 00:11:36,590 of assets starts to become uh a daunting task as opposed to a 199 00:11:36,590 - > 00:11:38,430 nice flow of operations. 200 00:11:38,590 - > 00:11:39,950 And that's what we're talking about here. 201 00:11:40,190 - > 00:11:43,070 SPEAKER_01: Yeah, I I think um the there's a there's definitely 202 00:11:43,070 - > 00:11:47,629 a correlation between digital operations and I'm just gonna 203 00:11:47,629 - > 00:11:49,629 call them physical operations because it's things that you're 204 00:11:49,629 - > 00:11:52,350 gonna you're gonna see throughout work, right? 205 00:11:52,510 - > 00:11:55,870 I I think a really good example of this is um like you you were 206 00:11:55,870 - > 00:11:58,910 talking about before, especially in in the lab environment where 207 00:11:58,910 - > 00:12:01,310 you have certain experiments that are done for certain 208 00:12:01,310 - > 00:12:01,950 programs. 209 00:12:02,190 - > 00:12:05,390 I think when you don't have enough information, especially 210 00:12:05,390 - > 00:12:07,470 around inventory management, supplies, right? 211 00:12:07,550 - > 00:12:10,430 Just we'll we'll just focus on lab supplies, is that when you 212 00:12:10,430 - > 00:12:13,390 fluctuate and do these different types of experiments, it's gonna 213 00:12:13,390 - > 00:12:16,430 increase or decrease the amount of materials that you need for 214 00:12:16,430 - > 00:12:17,230 certain things. 215 00:12:17,470 - > 00:12:20,590 And so if you don't have the right systems in place to 216 00:12:20,590 - > 00:12:23,870 collect the information on how much are you buying of this 217 00:12:23,870 - > 00:12:28,190 particular pipette or you know, these particular plastics and 218 00:12:28,190 - > 00:12:31,070 things like that, it creates a real disruption in how people 219 00:12:31,070 - > 00:12:32,910 physically work with one another. 220 00:12:33,070 - > 00:12:36,190 And it's it's all because you you're you don't have enough 221 00:12:36,190 - > 00:12:40,430 context to understand when we make these decisions for the 222 00:12:40,430 - > 00:12:43,310 rest of the company, is there something within our digital 223 00:12:43,310 - > 00:12:47,070 operations side that can inform us so that we know the impact to 224 00:12:47,230 - > 00:12:50,750 how physically it's going to influence our not only 225 00:12:50,750 - > 00:12:54,030 employees, but how things are going to get done uh across not 226 00:12:54,030 - > 00:12:55,950 one function, but multiple functions, right? 227 00:12:56,190 - > 00:13:00,190 And so I I think to your point before, it's uh it's often 228 00:13:00,190 - > 00:13:04,670 something that nobody looks at with the right lens just because 229 00:13:04,750 - > 00:13:09,230 in it's it's not easy to tell when things are siloed, like 230 00:13:09,310 - > 00:13:12,110 when you're looking at it on the computer, but when you talk to 231 00:13:12,110 - > 00:13:15,390 people, it's very, very clear that people are complaining, uh, 232 00:13:15,470 - > 00:13:17,710 well, I didn't find this, or this information's not here, or 233 00:13:17,710 - > 00:13:19,310 this system doesn't talk to this system. 234 00:13:19,470 - > 00:13:21,950 But when you look at the application, it it's not going 235 00:13:21,950 - > 00:13:22,750 to speak back to you. 236 00:13:22,830 - > 00:13:25,550 It's it's when we talk to our coworkers, when we talk to our 237 00:13:25,550 - > 00:13:29,150 teams, it's this thing like, where the hell am I gonna get 238 00:13:29,150 - > 00:13:29,710 this information? 239 00:13:29,790 - > 00:13:30,830 Because it's just not here. 240 00:13:31,629 - > 00:13:36,030 SPEAKER_00: So back to my previous point, um, we've in 241 00:13:36,030 - > 00:13:39,790 some cases we can be a little lazy when trying to point 242 00:13:39,790 - > 00:13:42,270 somebody to where where this information lives. 243 00:13:42,510 - > 00:13:44,350 Might say, oh, go and SharePoint. 244 00:13:45,310 - > 00:13:48,670 Have you ever been inside of a SharePoint for a company that's 245 00:13:48,670 - > 00:13:51,629 been in business for you know five, 10 years? 246 00:13:51,870 - > 00:13:58,030 There are thousands of places that you can wander in there and 247 00:13:58,030 - > 00:13:59,470 still not even come close. 248 00:13:59,629 - > 00:14:04,030 And and then your initial understanding of what you were 249 00:14:04,030 - > 00:14:07,950 expecting to see doesn't always match up what you end up seeing. 250 00:14:08,190 - > 00:14:11,629 So it just becomes this vicious cycle of great, I spent all this 251 00:14:11,629 - > 00:14:14,030 time and it doesn't actually show me anything. 252 00:14:14,270 - > 00:14:19,790 You know what we're when so so what happens when we don't 253 00:14:19,790 - > 00:14:22,990 prioritize responsible digital operations? 254 00:14:23,150 - > 00:14:25,870 These are the things that ends up happening where we're 255 00:14:25,870 - > 00:14:29,790 searching for data, we can't quite create the context. 256 00:14:30,030 - > 00:14:33,629 We may have to transcribe over and over again, like you said, 257 00:14:33,790 - > 00:14:37,470 different systems have different naming, different nomenclature 258 00:14:37,629 - > 00:14:41,550 that don't align with how we've presented, whether to 259 00:14:41,550 - > 00:14:45,070 leadership, whether into, you know, um, you know, connecting 260 00:14:45,070 - > 00:14:46,430 it across systems. 261 00:14:46,590 - > 00:14:50,110 And these are where it's it's it's real critical to have that 262 00:14:50,110 - > 00:14:52,830 unified data structure, even as things come in. 263 00:14:52,990 - > 00:14:56,350 Okay, now that things are coming in, let's make sure that we have 264 00:14:56,350 - > 00:14:57,390 some baselines. 265 00:14:57,550 - > 00:15:01,310 Here's the projects, here's roles or functions that are 266 00:15:01,310 - > 00:15:04,990 responsible for these things so that we can now start to create 267 00:15:04,990 - > 00:15:07,710 different views across your portfolio because that's 268 00:15:07,710 - > 00:15:10,430 ultimately what leadership is going to be looking for. 269 00:15:10,670 - > 00:15:14,750 Yes, the science is important, yes, the the location that 270 00:15:14,750 - > 00:15:18,750 you're at is important, the resources are important, but 271 00:15:18,750 - > 00:15:21,150 they cannot be viewed in a bubble. 272 00:15:21,230 - > 00:15:24,990 They need to be viewed together to have the right context to 273 00:15:24,990 - > 00:15:27,870 make the right decisions because you can always come back and 274 00:15:27,870 - > 00:15:31,390 say, well, what about the number of people that are on that 275 00:15:31,390 - > 00:15:31,790 project? 276 00:15:32,030 - > 00:15:34,830 Well, how long did this project take? 277 00:15:34,910 - > 00:15:39,310 And what were the resource needs for that, for that type of 278 00:15:39,310 - > 00:15:41,710 project or for that type of initiative? 279 00:15:42,030 - > 00:15:48,750 And you know, it's I go back to the frequency that I've seen in 280 00:15:49,230 - > 00:15:54,910 even in leadership discussions where seemingly questions that 281 00:15:54,910 - > 00:15:58,750 we should already have answers to are followed up with, I'll 282 00:15:58,750 - > 00:15:59,310 get back to you. 283 00:15:59,470 - > 00:16:00,590 I'll need to get back to you. 284 00:16:00,990 - > 00:16:03,629 It's a complex question, absolutely. 285 00:16:04,430 - > 00:16:08,190 But there should be a bare minimum to what we can just pull 286 00:16:08,190 - > 00:16:11,390 right up because we have the right architecture, we have the 287 00:16:11,390 - > 00:17:08,660 right data flow and the right people managing those systems, 288 00:17:08,900 - > 00:17:10,740 because that's the reality of it too. 289 00:17:10,980 - > 00:17:13,860 This is not any one person's responsibility. 290 00:17:14,019 - > 00:17:17,779 You know, we talk about in the biopharma Nexus part of you 291 00:17:17,779 - > 00:17:22,180 know, these first principles is that we have to own our of these 292 00:17:22,180 - > 00:17:25,299 shared themes, is that we have to own our software. 293 00:17:25,539 - > 00:17:29,539 If you are the main user of that software, you should know it 294 00:17:29,539 - > 00:17:33,380 more than anybody else at that organization and start reaching 295 00:17:33,380 - > 00:17:36,420 across the aisle to understand, hey, who's creating the 296 00:17:36,420 - > 00:17:37,460 architecture over there? 297 00:17:37,700 - > 00:17:40,259 I want to look at how you guys are naming things so that as 298 00:17:40,259 - > 00:17:43,700 we're building things out, we're gonna be able to connect it in 299 00:17:43,700 - > 00:17:44,340 the future. 300 00:17:44,500 - > 00:17:47,220 You know, these are things that unfortunately are not 301 00:17:47,220 - > 00:17:48,019 prioritized. 302 00:17:48,100 - > 00:17:51,779 It's more of a, you know, let's get it done as fast as we can. 303 00:17:52,100 - > 00:17:56,819 But we're, you know, these things are key for us to 304 00:17:57,140 - > 00:18:02,259 responsibly transform the operations and our day-to-day in 305 00:18:02,259 - > 00:18:05,059 these digital formats successfully. 306 00:18:05,220 - > 00:18:06,819 We just have to do them. 307 00:18:07,619 - > 00:18:10,339 SPEAKER_01: Yeah, I think you and you know, your point about 308 00:18:10,339 - > 00:18:11,619 management asking questions. 309 00:18:11,779 - > 00:18:14,740 I'm almost certain that most of the time they're asking the same 310 00:18:14,740 - > 00:18:15,379 questions. 311 00:18:15,699 - > 00:18:16,819 Where is the timeline? 312 00:18:16,980 - > 00:18:17,779 What are the risks? 313 00:18:17,859 - > 00:18:20,259 SPEAKER_00: Like that's how that's how I build most of my 314 00:18:20,259 - > 00:18:20,980 dashboards. 315 00:18:21,139 - > 00:18:24,659 Let me sit in one of your meetings for about two or three 316 00:18:24,659 - > 00:18:25,059 meetings. 317 00:18:25,619 - > 00:18:28,579 Okay, here's the eight questions that keep coming up. 318 00:18:28,740 - > 00:18:32,179 Let's just build things that answer those questions so that 319 00:18:32,179 - > 00:18:34,179 we start to get better questions. 320 00:18:34,500 - > 00:18:35,859 You nailed it. 321 00:18:36,019 - > 00:18:36,659 Absolutely. 322 00:18:37,139 - > 00:18:40,099 SPEAKER_01: Yeah, asking the same questions over and over 323 00:18:40,099 - > 00:18:40,339 again. 324 00:18:40,500 - > 00:18:43,699 But for some reason, when when new projects or initiatives come 325 00:18:43,699 - > 00:18:46,740 up, we we tend to get very creative in certain ways if 326 00:18:46,899 - > 00:18:51,139 there is no standardized process to create these things, is we 327 00:18:51,139 - > 00:18:54,099 start to customize them, and then now you get this one-off 328 00:18:54,419 - > 00:18:57,619 setup for something and it's not similar to something else. 329 00:18:57,699 - > 00:19:02,179 And now the the flow used to be flowing into a data lake, but 330 00:19:02,179 - > 00:19:04,579 now it's like these different data streams that are just you 331 00:19:04,579 - > 00:19:07,699 know going in separate directions, and it's hard for 332 00:19:07,699 - > 00:19:11,219 anybody to compare apples to apples if if things are going to 333 00:19:11,219 - > 00:19:12,419 be moving that way. 334 00:19:13,059 - > 00:19:15,379 SPEAKER_00: And how do you approach that when you come from 335 00:19:15,379 - > 00:19:16,499 the outside? 336 00:19:16,979 - > 00:19:22,899 It's so difficult to get up to speed when there's no real rhyme 337 00:19:22,899 - > 00:19:25,379 or reason with how things are connected. 338 00:19:25,459 - > 00:19:30,579 You know, there's I recently, I I think maybe earlier today, I 339 00:19:30,819 - > 00:19:35,299 scheduled a post, but it was on this idea that we need to get 340 00:19:35,299 - > 00:19:39,379 comfortable sort of building and archiving, pinning and 341 00:19:39,379 - > 00:19:43,379 unpinning, favoriting and unfavoriting, like to make our 342 00:19:43,379 - > 00:19:45,299 work more appeal more to us. 343 00:19:45,379 - > 00:19:50,659 Like it's okay to build some of these systems and then fold them 344 00:19:50,659 - > 00:19:52,659 away as the business evolves. 345 00:19:52,899 - > 00:19:56,819 I think we find ourselves now in a place where we're always 346 00:19:56,819 - > 00:19:59,859 trying to like, can we just stay with something for a long time 347 00:19:59,859 - > 00:20:01,539 to get really good at it? 348 00:20:01,779 - > 00:20:03,299 In some cases, yes. 349 00:20:03,459 - > 00:20:06,979 But if your company is growing and expanding into areas that 350 00:20:06,979 - > 00:20:11,459 you can't foresee, you have to expect that the system that 351 00:20:11,459 - > 00:20:16,099 you're building might change, but that architecture can very 352 00:20:16,419 - > 00:20:17,939 much stay the same. 353 00:20:18,179 - > 00:20:20,739 And that's how you build resilient systems. 354 00:20:20,899 - > 00:20:23,859 You build them based on an architecture because no matter 355 00:20:23,859 - > 00:20:27,539 what you're doing, or no matter what system you're you're you're 356 00:20:27,539 - > 00:20:32,739 migrating to, you still want the information to tell you the 357 00:20:32,739 - > 00:20:37,059 story that you've been trying to come up with, you know, and 358 00:20:37,059 - > 00:20:41,699 instead of looking at, you know, having you know seven, eight, 359 00:20:41,859 - > 00:20:45,299 nine, ten PowerPoint slides open, and you're now trying to 360 00:20:45,299 - > 00:20:48,499 take little pieces from all of them so that you can craft a 361 00:20:48,499 - > 00:20:48,899 story. 362 00:20:49,139 - > 00:20:52,899 These things should be somewhat available through how your data 363 00:20:52,899 - > 00:20:53,619 is connected. 364 00:20:53,779 - > 00:20:56,099 And I'm not saying that everything is going to be in the 365 00:20:56,099 - > 00:20:59,859 same place because that's the likelihood of that is very slim. 366 00:21:00,019 - > 00:21:03,619 You know, some things are more text heavy, some things are more 367 00:21:03,619 - > 00:21:07,299 data heavy with, you know, with mainly integers, some things may 368 00:21:07,299 - > 00:21:09,139 be contextual, like a CRM. 369 00:21:09,219 - > 00:21:11,379 You know, this is the conversation I had, and it feels 370 00:21:11,379 - > 00:21:14,739 like this, and we should come up, you know, with another uh, 371 00:21:14,819 - > 00:21:15,939 you know, conversation. 372 00:21:16,099 - > 00:21:17,699 So data is gonna look differently. 373 00:21:17,779 - > 00:21:20,259 I'm not saying these things should all live in the same 374 00:21:20,259 - > 00:21:24,739 place, but I think as your organization moves and matures, 375 00:21:24,899 - > 00:21:27,699 you have to think that your systems may do that as well. 376 00:21:27,939 - > 00:21:31,859 But if we maintain that architecture, if you have in the 377 00:21:31,859 - > 00:21:36,019 back of your mind, or even you know, static as a lucid chart 378 00:21:36,019 - > 00:21:42,179 flow or something, that creates the strength and resilience for 379 00:21:42,179 - > 00:21:43,699 when change does happen. 380 00:21:43,859 - > 00:21:48,179 That we know how the data needs to connect, we know who needs 381 00:21:48,179 - > 00:21:49,539 what kind of information. 382 00:21:49,619 - > 00:21:52,339 And I think those are really critical for when there's any 383 00:21:52,339 - > 00:21:56,419 kind of digital transformation for people to be able to develop 384 00:21:56,419 - > 00:22:01,699 something that can move without disrupting how people work. 385 00:22:02,739 - > 00:22:05,459 SPEAKER_01: Yeah, I think there's um a few different ways 386 00:22:05,459 - > 00:22:06,019 to look at it. 387 00:22:06,099 - > 00:22:09,139 And the way that I prefer to look at it, especially for 388 00:22:09,699 - > 00:22:13,219 things that uh these larger companies use, is you look at 389 00:22:13,219 - > 00:22:15,859 the application and you have to understand like what the 390 00:22:16,019 - > 00:22:19,299 different end users are engaging with, right, on the particular 391 00:22:19,299 - > 00:22:20,579 platform or application. 392 00:22:20,659 - > 00:22:22,739 And how does this impact their work day-to-day? 393 00:22:22,899 - > 00:22:26,099 I think a really good example is looking at like a what we would 394 00:22:26,099 - > 00:22:28,339 call a computerized maintenance management system. 395 00:22:28,499 - > 00:22:30,979 So this is where you have all your records for your equipment, 396 00:22:31,059 - > 00:22:32,019 your work orders. 397 00:22:32,259 - > 00:22:35,939 Some of it will have inventory, so you know, your parts that you 398 00:22:35,939 - > 00:22:37,619 need for certain work orders, right? 399 00:22:37,859 - > 00:22:41,139 So for your technician, it'll be really helpful to know, you 400 00:22:41,139 - > 00:22:43,939 know, what is it that I have to do today, you know, what's 401 00:22:43,939 - > 00:22:46,739 coming in the week so I can, you know, create my schedule and 402 00:22:47,219 - > 00:22:50,499 come up with um a plan for how I'm going to do all these things 403 00:22:50,499 - > 00:22:51,459 throughout the week. 404 00:22:51,699 - > 00:22:57,059 I think a another stakeholder that would be a part of that 405 00:22:57,059 - > 00:23:03,379 would be if you have a uh a QA group that has to review um 406 00:23:03,379 - > 00:23:08,419 certain changes that impact uh quality impacting systems, you 407 00:23:08,419 - > 00:23:12,099 would want to have a setup where they can quickly go in there and 408 00:23:12,099 - > 00:23:15,379 view what it is that they need to review and approve so that 409 00:23:15,379 - > 00:23:16,659 certain changes can be made. 410 00:23:17,859 - > 00:23:21,539 And there's, you know, understanding how the the data 411 00:23:21,539 - > 00:23:25,859 is input into the system allows you to construct the report or 412 00:23:25,859 - > 00:23:28,739 the dashboard and the or the information needed for that end 413 00:23:28,739 - > 00:23:29,059 user. 414 00:23:29,219 - > 00:23:32,899 And thinking about it from the the end user perspective, they 415 00:23:32,899 - > 00:23:35,619 don't want to have to go into the application and then click a 416 00:23:35,619 - > 00:23:37,779 thousand different windows to figure out what it is that they 417 00:23:37,779 - > 00:23:38,179 need to do. 418 00:23:38,419 - > 00:23:38,739 Right. 419 00:23:38,979 - > 00:23:41,539 I think they would, you know, for their job, they they want to 420 00:23:41,539 - > 00:23:43,939 know, you know, these are the things that I, you know, the top 421 00:23:43,939 - > 00:23:46,899 three things I need to know to to get through my day. 422 00:23:47,139 - > 00:23:50,419 And I I think you know, one layer above that is gonna be 423 00:23:50,419 - > 00:23:52,179 your your management layer, right? 424 00:23:52,259 - > 00:23:54,739 Where they're looking at, okay, you know, they were. 425 00:23:55,379 - > 00:23:57,939 X number of work orders that were scheduled for the month. 426 00:23:58,019 - > 00:23:58,659 Are we on track? 427 00:23:58,819 - > 00:23:59,379 Are we not? 428 00:23:59,539 - > 00:24:02,419 And so they might go, hey, you know, it looks like we're 429 00:24:02,419 - > 00:24:03,299 struggling a little bit. 430 00:24:03,379 - > 00:24:06,499 So let's let's deploy some more resources to help out this 431 00:24:06,499 - > 00:24:09,859 particular team in resolving those work orders. 432 00:24:10,019 - > 00:24:12,499 Or it might be, hey, it looks like QA is backlog. 433 00:24:12,819 - > 00:24:16,499 Let's figure out how we can help them prioritize the list so that 434 00:24:16,499 - > 00:24:19,459 they can go through the most critical changes first, and then 435 00:24:19,459 - > 00:24:21,699 the other ones can kind of go in the back burner. 436 00:24:21,779 - > 00:24:24,659 But looking at the application and how the different end users 437 00:24:24,659 - > 00:24:26,659 engage with it, I think is really important. 438 00:24:27,699 - > 00:24:31,059 And I think again, this depends on the context, right? 439 00:24:31,219 - > 00:24:35,139 So when you look at a like a portfolio or project management 440 00:24:35,139 - > 00:24:37,859 group, they're looking at a whole bunch of different things 441 00:24:37,859 - > 00:24:39,619 where you have all these different systems, right? 442 00:24:39,779 - > 00:24:42,979 And so chances are they're probably not pulling 100% of all 443 00:24:42,979 - > 00:24:46,019 the different data points that you have in all these systems, 444 00:24:46,099 - > 00:24:49,219 but there's probably select things that they need in order 445 00:24:49,219 - > 00:24:51,699 to report back and for them to make decisions, right? 446 00:24:51,859 - > 00:24:54,179 So that's coming at it from a different lens where you're 447 00:24:54,179 - > 00:24:56,739 looking at your role and then pulling from multiple data 448 00:24:56,739 - > 00:25:00,259 sources versus the initial example where you're an end 449 00:25:00,259 - > 00:25:02,979 user, but you're pulling multiple data sources from the 450 00:25:02,979 - > 00:25:03,939 same application. 451 00:25:04,099 - > 00:25:08,499 And so these things can get really complicated, convoluted, 452 00:25:08,579 - > 00:25:11,219 whatever you want to say, but it's it's good to have that 453 00:25:11,219 - > 00:25:14,499 mapping out so that you can configure the application, the 454 00:25:14,499 - > 00:25:18,259 data flow so that it matches the need for what their job or role 455 00:25:18,259 - > 00:25:18,419 is. 456 00:25:18,659 - > 00:25:19,139 SPEAKER_00: I love that. 457 00:25:19,219 - > 00:25:22,819 You know, I I have here written um, you know, when we talk about 458 00:25:22,819 - > 00:25:25,939 what some of these primary risk factors are, you can end up with 459 00:25:25,939 - > 00:25:28,979 fragmented data structures when you don't take the approach that 460 00:25:28,979 - > 00:25:29,859 you're talking about. 461 00:25:30,019 - > 00:25:31,059 And what does that mean? 462 00:25:31,219 - > 00:25:32,339 I think we've heard it a lot. 463 00:25:32,659 - > 00:25:33,779 We're building it as we go. 464 00:25:34,019 - > 00:25:38,979 You know, I understand that from you know the standpoint of 465 00:25:39,219 - > 00:25:42,979 building a new group or you know, starting a new arm of the 466 00:25:42,979 - > 00:25:46,419 organization, um, or even just starting up a new organization. 467 00:25:46,579 - > 00:25:52,259 But I I think what it sort of becomes this like badge of honor 468 00:25:52,339 - > 00:25:55,139 that, like, oh yeah, you know, we're just we keep working and 469 00:25:55,219 - > 00:25:57,779 you know, we don't know how to prioritize anything, we're just 470 00:25:57,779 - > 00:25:59,539 gonna keep on moving through. 471 00:25:59,779 - > 00:26:02,979 And we have to ask ourselves like, is that really the best 472 00:26:02,979 - > 00:26:07,219 way for us to move this giant shit that we're trying to, which 473 00:26:07,219 - > 00:26:10,499 is the organization, all of its assets, all of its people, into 474 00:26:10,499 - > 00:26:12,179 that successful next stage? 475 00:26:12,419 - > 00:26:18,179 You know, we're not taking a pause to ask ourselves, what are 476 00:26:18,179 - > 00:26:20,819 those things that we need to have happen in the future? 477 00:26:21,059 - > 00:26:23,619 What's the data or the information that is going to 478 00:26:23,619 - > 00:26:28,579 influence that at these various stages so that we can start to 479 00:26:28,579 - > 00:26:34,579 at least, you know, conceptually understand how these things need 480 00:26:34,579 - > 00:26:38,019 to be linked so that we can make those better decisions. 481 00:26:38,179 - > 00:26:40,019 And what do I mean by better decisions? 482 00:26:40,179 - > 00:26:44,659 More informed decisions, as opposed to taking one or two 483 00:26:44,659 - > 00:26:48,659 data points and the comments from a person and say, okay, 484 00:26:48,739 - > 00:26:50,259 we're gonna go in that direction. 485 00:26:50,419 - > 00:26:54,259 We actually have data to back up why we're making the decisions 486 00:26:54,259 - > 00:26:57,459 that we're making, you know, that are the best at that point 487 00:26:57,539 - > 00:27:00,339 for point in time for the for the organization. 488 00:27:00,739 - > 00:27:04,739 So, you know, we're we've seen where there's no single source 489 00:27:04,739 - > 00:27:07,459 of truth, and that sort of becomes this like wild, wild 490 00:27:07,459 - > 00:27:07,779 west. 491 00:27:08,099 - > 00:27:10,259 You're struggling to know more. 492 00:27:10,419 - > 00:27:14,419 So it's just this constant reconciliation of how else can I 493 00:27:14,419 - > 00:27:14,899 frame this? 494 00:27:15,059 - > 00:27:17,459 How else can I get the information to tell me more 495 00:27:17,459 - > 00:27:18,659 about what I'm looking at? 496 00:27:18,899 - > 00:27:22,099 When you don't have this very thoughtfully put together, you 497 00:27:22,099 - > 00:27:25,139 start to increase that risk where you're making decisions 498 00:27:25,139 - > 00:27:28,659 that are misinformed, because you may have a data point that 499 00:27:28,659 - > 00:27:33,539 is pointing you to choose, you know, the red pill, but you have 500 00:27:33,539 - > 00:27:36,499 two other data sets that are telling you, no, this is 501 00:27:36,499 - > 00:27:39,699 definitely the green pill, but you don't know how to access it. 502 00:27:39,859 - > 00:27:41,939 You didn't even know that they were relevant to the 503 00:27:41,939 - > 00:27:44,179 conversation or to the question you're trying to answer. 504 00:27:44,419 - > 00:27:51,139 Points here that um I think we feel in the day-to-day, and it 505 00:27:51,299 - > 00:27:55,939 becomes this sort of, yeah, you know, we're we're we're we're 506 00:27:55,939 - > 00:27:56,739 flying the plane. 507 00:27:56,819 - > 00:27:57,139 What is it? 508 00:27:57,219 - > 00:28:00,099 We're flying the plane, I don't know, something like while we're 509 00:28:00,499 - > 00:28:02,499 trying to change the uh the engine at the same time. 510 00:28:03,219 - > 00:28:04,179 Yeah, yeah, yeah. 511 00:28:04,339 - > 00:28:07,139 You know, we're driving the train and and laying down the 512 00:28:07,139 - > 00:28:07,939 tracks. 513 00:28:08,579 - > 00:28:12,179 But if you don't know where those tracks are supposed to 514 00:28:12,179 - > 00:28:16,499 take you, then how do you even know that you're building it in 515 00:28:16,499 - > 00:28:17,459 the right direction? 516 00:28:17,699 - > 00:28:21,699 You know, your compass is a little bit broken, but if you're 517 00:28:21,699 - > 00:28:25,299 not thoughtfully thinking about where those tracks need to be 518 00:28:25,299 - > 00:28:28,979 laid and in what direction, you're gonna end up off the mat 519 00:28:29,299 - > 00:28:33,939 very quickly and struggling to make decisions for that next 520 00:28:33,939 - > 00:28:34,579 step. 521 00:28:34,899 - > 00:28:38,259 SPEAKER_01: Yeah, there's a good uh quote from his name is Naval 522 00:28:38,659 - > 00:28:41,059 Ravakant, and uh, I've been following him for a while. 523 00:28:41,139 - > 00:28:43,619 And he hates being called a modern-day philosopher, but he 524 00:28:43,619 - > 00:28:45,859 was really successful in tech, and he has this really good 525 00:28:45,859 - > 00:28:50,019 definition of success, which is it's basically two things 526 00:28:50,179 - > 00:28:52,899 getting what you want and wanting the right things, right? 527 00:28:52,979 - > 00:28:56,739 And I think this is very applicable to data, is you have 528 00:28:56,739 - > 00:29:02,019 to know what the right data is that you want for whatever 529 00:29:02,019 - > 00:29:04,819 you're trying to do, and then enabling people so that they can 530 00:29:04,819 - > 00:29:05,779 actually give it to you, right? 531 00:29:05,859 - > 00:29:08,659 And that this is where it comes into that like user interface 532 00:29:08,659 - > 00:29:11,379 aspect of how data flows are set up. 533 00:29:11,619 - > 00:29:14,659 If if you want certain data points so you can make a certain 534 00:29:14,659 - > 00:29:18,819 decision, you have to make it easy or somewhat easy for the 535 00:29:18,819 - > 00:29:20,819 person to give you that information, right? 536 00:29:20,979 - > 00:29:24,739 Don't make it some super complicated thing where people 537 00:29:24,739 - > 00:29:28,019 have to again click through a bunch of windows and then they 538 00:29:28,019 - > 00:29:31,859 have to, you know, enter through you know one avenue to go 539 00:29:31,859 - > 00:29:32,499 somewhere else. 540 00:29:32,659 - > 00:29:35,139 And that navigation nightmare, right? 541 00:29:35,219 - > 00:29:37,699 And where it's this thing where people get frustrated, and then 542 00:29:37,699 - > 00:29:42,579 that's when you have this um lack of uh people just give up, 543 00:29:42,659 - > 00:29:42,819 right? 544 00:29:42,899 - > 00:29:45,539 They they don't want to have to go through all these hoops to 545 00:29:45,539 - > 00:29:46,739 give you that information. 546 00:29:46,979 - > 00:29:50,739 If if it's something simple, it increases the the likelihood of 547 00:29:50,739 - > 00:29:52,739 somebody giving you accurate information. 548 00:29:52,979 - > 00:29:57,939 If you make it incredibly difficult, it's it makes it very 549 00:29:57,939 - > 00:30:03,539 hard to um make sure that they do that consistently, I guess is 550 00:30:03,539 - > 00:30:04,819 what I'm saying, right? 551 00:30:06,499 - > 00:30:09,219 You're already asking for this information that may or may not 552 00:30:09,219 - > 00:30:12,819 be in the scope of their role, and so you might as well make it 553 00:30:12,819 - > 00:30:14,819 easier for them to give you that information. 554 00:30:14,979 - > 00:30:17,059 And I think it's I don't think this is rocket science. 555 00:30:17,139 - > 00:30:19,299 I think a lot of people just don't really think about that 556 00:30:19,299 - > 00:30:19,619 aspect. 557 00:30:19,699 - > 00:30:22,739 They just go, oh, I need this information for this report or 558 00:30:22,739 - > 00:30:24,259 whatever deck I'm putting together. 559 00:30:24,419 - > 00:30:27,379 And then they don't think about like, well, how how would this 560 00:30:27,379 - > 00:30:28,499 person actually put this information? 561 00:30:30,739 - > 00:30:32,979 SPEAKER_00: You know, I think it when we talk about it in that 562 00:30:32,979 - > 00:30:34,899 sense, we don't know what we don't know. 563 00:30:35,059 - > 00:30:38,419 So I think there's also this part where leadership or 564 00:30:38,419 - > 00:30:41,539 managers, like maybe they're not in these systems very often. 565 00:30:41,699 - > 00:30:45,219 So they're just gonna ask you a question, hey, can you tell me 566 00:30:45,219 - > 00:30:48,659 the last time that this happened where we spent you know X amount 567 00:30:48,659 - > 00:30:54,819 of money on a particular project and a modality of a therapy? 568 00:30:54,899 - > 00:30:59,539 Of I mean, that could take days depending on who you're asking. 569 00:30:59,699 - > 00:31:03,859 And it doesn't really give you clarity in the resolution. 570 00:31:04,019 - > 00:31:06,019 Like, are you looking for one big number? 571 00:31:06,179 - > 00:31:08,259 Are you looking for like a trending graph? 572 00:31:08,419 - > 00:31:12,419 And either way, if the data is not really positioned to answer 573 00:31:12,419 - > 00:31:17,059 a question like that, it is just gonna be a manual burden to 574 00:31:17,059 - > 00:31:17,699 create that. 575 00:31:18,019 - > 00:31:24,019 And even with the use of AI, if your data has different names 576 00:31:24,019 - > 00:31:27,859 and located in in disparate systems, like and you don't have 577 00:31:27,859 - > 00:31:30,739 this idea of like a data lake or something that you can sort of 578 00:31:30,739 - > 00:31:33,379 query, who knows what kind of information you're gonna be 579 00:31:33,379 - > 00:31:33,779 getting. 580 00:31:34,019 - > 00:31:38,499 So, you know, now again, making decisions on inaccurate 581 00:31:38,499 - > 00:31:42,259 information or you know, uh falsified context, you know, 582 00:31:42,419 - > 00:31:46,659 hallucin hallucinated context in other in other ways. 583 00:31:46,899 - > 00:31:53,539 So it's I've seen it and it's uh even now in 2026, you it's still 584 00:31:54,019 - > 00:31:56,819 present in in the workplace. 585 00:31:57,299 - > 00:32:05,379 And it does take uh a person, a lead, a guide, a sherpa to be 586 00:32:05,379 - > 00:32:10,179 constantly thinking about this because we are making decisions 587 00:32:10,339 - > 00:32:15,219 directly from data, not just from the voices of those that 588 00:32:15,219 - > 00:32:18,019 gather, not just from how we feel about things. 589 00:32:18,259 - > 00:32:22,179 We need data to feel confident that the things that we're 590 00:32:22,179 - > 00:32:26,739 deciding on are based or are rooted in some factual 591 00:32:26,739 - > 00:32:27,219 information. 592 00:32:27,539 - > 00:32:29,539 That's really what this boils down to. 593 00:32:29,859 - > 00:32:34,179 So we need to, and as these companies and these projects 594 00:32:34,179 - > 00:32:41,859 grow, the data volume goes up and the clarity goes down, 595 00:32:42,019 - > 00:32:44,739 especially when you don't consider what that architecture 596 00:32:44,739 - > 00:32:49,219 looks like, what the data flow, how your operations digitally 597 00:32:49,219 - > 00:32:51,139 are going to be talking to each other. 598 00:32:51,379 - > 00:32:54,819 And that's and this is where you feel that, oh, these are growing 599 00:32:54,819 - > 00:32:56,819 pains, growing pains, growing pains. 600 00:32:56,899 - > 00:32:58,979 How long are growing pains supposed to last? 601 00:32:59,859 - > 00:33:04,419 And growing pains to me just says we did not think about how 602 00:33:04,419 - > 00:33:06,019 this would look as we grew. 603 00:33:06,179 - > 00:33:08,819 SPEAKER_01: Yeah, and then you you get to the point where if if 604 00:33:08,819 - > 00:33:12,179 you do have if you've amassed a lot of data for, let's say, 605 00:33:12,419 - > 00:33:13,859 resource projections, right? 606 00:33:13,939 - > 00:33:16,979 This is a very tough thing that a lot of companies deal with is 607 00:33:17,139 - > 00:33:21,859 how many resources do I need to support a particular set of 608 00:33:22,419 - > 00:33:23,619 programs, right? 609 00:33:23,939 - > 00:33:26,899 And so you go through this exercise of, okay, well, let's 610 00:33:26,899 - > 00:33:29,459 look at this particular program and then has this set of like 611 00:33:29,459 - > 00:33:31,699 metadata associated with attributes, right? 612 00:33:31,939 - > 00:33:35,619 It might be for this particular modality, and it, you know, the 613 00:33:35,619 - > 00:33:39,299 complexity level was medium, and you know, the the amount of that 614 00:33:39,299 - > 00:33:42,339 we needed was for however many patients. 615 00:33:42,499 - > 00:33:47,219 And so you're relying on people providing you their time of how 616 00:33:47,219 - > 00:33:49,619 long they spent on certain things, but then you're not 617 00:33:49,619 - > 00:33:52,739 thinking about, okay, when the person's entering the time, what 618 00:33:52,739 - > 00:33:54,259 does half an hour mean? 619 00:33:54,339 - > 00:33:57,139 Or what does one hour actually mean here if they're working on 620 00:33:57,139 - > 00:33:59,139 something that impacts multiple programs? 621 00:33:59,299 - > 00:34:02,339 Like, how do you, how do I, how do I actually build that into my 622 00:34:02,579 - > 00:34:03,459 resource model? 623 00:34:03,699 - > 00:34:06,739 And I think it's important, like you, like you said, right? 624 00:34:06,899 - > 00:34:10,659 Designing the uh the art, like the architecture of the data 625 00:34:10,659 - > 00:34:13,940 flow so that we understand from the moment that we allow people 626 00:34:13,940 - > 00:34:16,900 to enter things in, this is what this means. 627 00:34:17,139 - > 00:34:19,699 You can't get to the end of it and then you have a bunch of 628 00:34:19,699 - > 00:34:22,179 data and then you start moving the goalpost, and then people 629 00:34:22,179 - > 00:34:25,380 start losing confidence in the actual data and the insights 630 00:34:25,380 - > 00:34:27,380 that you're getting from it because they go, oh, well, 631 00:34:27,460 - > 00:34:29,940 that's not accurate because when they were working on this, that 632 00:34:29,940 - > 00:34:31,300 actually counted for multiple programs. 633 00:34:31,460 - > 00:34:33,619 Okay, well, why don't you say that in the beginning when you 634 00:34:33,619 - > 00:34:35,940 were asking people to input that information? 635 00:34:36,099 - > 00:34:39,380 Because now you're you're having to make these pretty risky 636 00:34:39,380 - > 00:34:43,059 decisions on do I need five scientists or do I need 50? 637 00:34:43,139 - > 00:34:46,900 I don't I don't know because the information that you provided me 638 00:34:46,900 - > 00:34:49,860 on the these couple of assets are telling me this thing, and 639 00:34:49,860 - > 00:34:51,940 then something is is telling me something else. 640 00:34:52,179 - > 00:34:55,380 And that's you're and that's a situation where you're looking 641 00:34:55,380 - > 00:34:56,900 to increase capacity, right? 642 00:34:57,059 - > 00:35:00,500 If you go the other way around, and now it's saying, and 643 00:35:00,500 - > 00:35:03,300 actually, based on you know the the change in the pipeline, we 644 00:35:03,300 - > 00:35:05,060 actually need less people in your department. 645 00:35:05,220 - > 00:35:07,540 And now they go, oh no, the model is actually really 646 00:35:07,540 - > 00:35:07,940 accurate. 647 00:35:08,020 - > 00:35:10,900 I think I think it's I think we actually need that many people, 648 00:35:10,980 - > 00:35:11,220 right? 649 00:35:11,300 - > 00:35:14,180 Because people don't want to lose headcount and they don't 650 00:35:14,180 - > 00:35:15,140 want to lose budgets. 651 00:35:15,460 - > 00:35:15,700 SPEAKER_00: Yeah. 652 00:35:15,780 - > 00:35:18,980 They they want to have more, they want to save, they want to 653 00:35:18,980 - > 00:35:21,380 protect what was allocated to them initially. 654 00:35:21,540 - > 00:35:21,780 Absolutely. 655 00:35:22,020 - > 00:35:22,180 Right. 656 00:35:22,260 - > 00:35:24,580 SPEAKER_01: It's funny how the data tries to change meaning 657 00:35:24,580 - > 00:35:27,540 when it impacts the the headcount. 658 00:35:28,580 - > 00:35:33,140 SPEAKER_00: Long ago, we I was in a situation where this became 659 00:35:33,140 - > 00:35:37,300 uh new at the organization, and we started getting a lot of 660 00:35:37,300 - > 00:35:41,460 people that said, what if we work more than 40 hours and the 661 00:35:41,460 - > 00:35:43,380 goal here was percentage? 662 00:35:43,700 - > 00:35:46,980 Sure, I mean, I I think you're pointing out something too that, 663 00:35:47,060 - > 00:35:53,380 you know, even uh one FTE as best as we can do it, one FTE we 664 00:35:53,380 - > 00:35:57,300 think is 40 hours a week, but we don't know how well people are 665 00:35:57,300 - > 00:35:59,140 leveraging their 40 hours a week. 666 00:35:59,300 - > 00:36:01,700 We don't know really where they're spending their time or 667 00:36:01,700 - > 00:36:05,140 what that actually means in the context of a project that is 668 00:36:05,140 - > 00:36:09,220 early in the process, in the middle, or somewhere towards the 669 00:36:09,220 - > 00:36:09,380 end. 670 00:36:09,860 - > 00:36:15,300 And I think that's an important distinction that we can't just 671 00:36:15,540 - > 00:36:20,420 base our needs on how much time has been spent on a specific 672 00:36:20,420 - > 00:36:20,820 project. 673 00:36:20,980 - > 00:36:23,540 We have to think about what are those activities, what are those 674 00:36:23,540 - > 00:36:28,900 demands at these different stages, and then start to query 675 00:36:29,300 - > 00:36:31,540 not just, oh, we went up or down. 676 00:36:31,780 - > 00:36:33,220 Does this make sense? 677 00:36:33,620 - > 00:36:36,660 We can't accept all these things at face value. 678 00:36:36,820 - > 00:36:40,980 We have to also question whether, you know, question the 679 00:36:41,220 - > 00:36:44,740 validity of whatever model that you're deciding to propose for 680 00:36:44,740 - > 00:36:45,540 your business. 681 00:36:45,860 - > 00:36:49,380 Does this make sense that we're spending that, you know, this 682 00:36:49,380 - > 00:36:54,260 function is spending 70% of their time on this project that 683 00:36:54,260 - > 00:36:56,100 is at this phase of development? 684 00:36:56,260 - > 00:36:59,140 Let's go have a conversation to understand what that actually 685 00:36:59,140 - > 00:36:59,540 means. 686 00:36:59,860 - > 00:37:04,980 Because resourcing is not about increasing or decreasing per se. 687 00:37:05,300 - > 00:37:10,580 I think it is more about you have this bucket of elements 688 00:37:10,820 - > 00:37:15,140 that is your systems, your computers, your people, the 689 00:37:15,140 - > 00:37:18,900 training, the technology, skill sets. 690 00:37:19,060 - > 00:37:25,940 How do you launch this to run 20 programs, to run a facility that 691 00:37:25,940 - > 00:37:30,420 does eight different medications or 25 different types of 692 00:37:30,820 - > 00:37:32,420 synthesis, et cetera? 693 00:37:32,580 - > 00:37:36,660 Finding out not just these whole numbers and saying, let's 694 00:37:36,660 - > 00:37:41,220 respond based on this, but also looking at that and saying, in 695 00:37:41,220 - > 00:37:42,180 what context? 696 00:37:42,340 - > 00:37:45,700 You know, start to develop those guardrails and those rules for 697 00:37:45,780 - > 00:37:49,380 like, you know, what are we, what are we putting into the 698 00:37:49,380 - > 00:37:53,540 system in terms of how much we're working on something, what 699 00:37:53,540 - > 00:37:57,300 we're actually doing, where that effort is being done so that you 700 00:37:57,300 - > 00:38:03,700 can actually have data that supports any resourcing, any 701 00:38:03,700 - > 00:38:07,220 budget conversation, any partnership conversations. 702 00:38:07,380 - > 00:38:12,340 It's critically important when that doesn't show, that also 703 00:38:12,340 - > 00:38:16,180 shows when you're having those discussions and you're you're 704 00:38:16,180 - > 00:38:19,060 sort of in your mind thinking like these people have no idea 705 00:38:19,460 - > 00:38:24,100 what it will take to do this, they have no clue what to expect 706 00:38:24,180 - > 00:38:24,980 in the future. 707 00:38:25,140 - > 00:38:28,340 And you might have the data, but if you haven't pieced it 708 00:38:28,340 - > 00:38:30,580 together, it's a nightmare. 709 00:38:30,980 - > 00:38:34,980 You know, you talked about getting those requests, most of 710 00:38:34,980 - > 00:38:36,100 them are ad hoc. 711 00:38:37,140 - > 00:38:40,420 You know, you'll get a few of the same questions in the same 712 00:38:40,500 - > 00:38:42,980 in those similar meetings, and then you get those emails. 713 00:38:43,700 - > 00:38:46,660 Hey, can you help me figure out one, two, three, four, five? 714 00:38:47,220 - > 00:38:49,300 Now we're looking at fragmented data. 715 00:38:49,460 - > 00:38:51,940 Now we're looking at data that doesn't even have the same 716 00:38:51,940 - > 00:38:54,980 language, and and you're spending this time to translate 717 00:38:54,980 - > 00:38:57,060 it to develop an insight. 718 00:38:57,380 - > 00:39:03,460 AI is not gonna help craft the narrative of your story if your 719 00:39:03,460 - > 00:39:06,900 characters have different names than what in one group versus 720 00:39:06,900 - > 00:39:07,140 another. 721 00:39:07,380 - > 00:39:11,060 If you know, and we can go on and on and on, I think, I think 722 00:39:11,140 - > 00:39:11,540 on that. 723 00:39:11,700 - > 00:39:16,340 But what we're trying to get to is that there are risks that we 724 00:39:16,340 - > 00:39:22,260 can identify in these organizations that go from our 725 00:39:22,260 - > 00:39:27,220 system to system connectivity, how manual the data burden has 726 00:39:27,220 - > 00:39:31,700 become, the ownership, who's owning the data that enters into 727 00:39:31,700 - > 00:39:34,980 these spaces and the source of truth, who's managing that? 728 00:39:35,140 - > 00:39:37,620 And you're talking about timelines, you're talking about 729 00:39:37,620 - > 00:39:41,060 research data, you're talking if there's a particular machine 730 00:39:41,060 - > 00:39:44,020 that somebody is the expert in, they should also own the data 731 00:39:44,020 - > 00:39:45,700 that is happening within there. 732 00:39:45,940 - > 00:39:49,700 Um, you know, the the data to decision flow. 733 00:39:49,940 - > 00:39:53,540 What's the data that we need to create, you know, to come up 734 00:39:53,540 - > 00:39:56,740 with decisions at each of these different layers? 735 00:39:56,820 - > 00:39:59,700 And then your integrity, your data integrity and the risk 736 00:39:59,700 - > 00:40:00,180 exposure. 737 00:40:00,420 - > 00:40:01,700 Are we training? 738 00:40:01,860 - > 00:40:08,100 Are we giving our workforce the capacity to be successful in all 739 00:40:08,100 - > 00:40:09,860 of these digital operations? 740 00:40:10,100 - > 00:40:13,940 That we're giving them constant reminders of how we need the 741 00:40:13,940 - > 00:40:18,740 work to transform from conversations and post-it notes 742 00:40:18,740 - > 00:40:23,380 and sticky notes to things that live in a digital architected, 743 00:40:23,700 - > 00:40:28,740 in a in a well-architected digital space that will decrease 744 00:40:28,740 - > 00:40:34,820 your exposure to making wrong decisions, to delays, to risk of 745 00:40:34,820 - > 00:40:35,940 misinformation. 746 00:40:36,180 - > 00:40:40,420 Um, you know, and all of these things, luckily, Lawrence, for 747 00:40:40,420 - > 00:40:44,420 our listeners and and those that have been following us, we have 748 00:40:45,060 - > 00:40:49,620 taken this whole topic that we've talked about today, and 749 00:40:49,620 - > 00:40:53,300 we've put it into one of our risk assessments to help people 750 00:40:53,300 - > 00:40:57,140 identify where is their biggest issue? 751 00:40:57,380 - > 00:40:59,460 Is it that there's no integrity? 752 00:40:59,620 - > 00:41:03,380 Is it that the decision, the data to decision flow is broken? 753 00:41:03,620 - > 00:41:06,820 There's no real source of truth, the manual data burner, each of 754 00:41:06,820 - > 00:41:09,860 these pieces requires a different approach to fix. 755 00:41:10,100 - > 00:41:13,380 So, how do you focus on the right one so that you're 756 00:41:13,700 - > 00:41:18,340 creating a more mature, healthier digital operations? 757 00:41:18,500 - > 00:41:21,140 And we have that in our risk assessments. 758 00:41:21,380 - > 00:41:24,020 SPEAKER_01: Yeah, and you know, to your point, the the 759 00:41:24,020 - > 00:41:26,820 assessment itself, it's it's not, you know, whether you have 760 00:41:26,820 - > 00:41:27,300 this or that. 761 00:41:27,380 - > 00:41:31,860 It's it's really gauging the how the people on your team perceive 762 00:41:31,860 - > 00:41:35,460 or interpret how strong your your digital operations are, 763 00:41:35,620 - > 00:41:35,860 right? 764 00:41:36,100 - > 00:41:39,540 Because certain users might be really great at it, and then 765 00:41:39,540 - > 00:41:42,500 other users are maybe they don't have enough context, right? 766 00:41:42,660 - > 00:41:45,860 You know, like we were saying before, you know, one hour of 767 00:41:45,860 - > 00:41:49,780 Sally is not equivalent to one hour of Bob because Sally is way 768 00:41:49,780 - > 00:41:52,260 more adept at accessing all the information. 769 00:41:52,500 - > 00:41:53,620 But should that be the case? 770 00:41:53,780 - > 00:41:57,780 Shouldn't everybody have the right access level or or have 771 00:41:57,780 - > 00:42:00,820 the means to access the data so that they can, you know, do 772 00:42:00,820 - > 00:42:02,100 their certain roles and jobs. 773 00:42:02,260 - > 00:42:05,860 And I think the the beauty of the assessment, it's it's a it's 774 00:42:05,860 - > 00:42:09,940 an opportunity for the team to reflect and really gauge how 775 00:42:09,940 - > 00:42:12,900 well things are set up and and where you need improvements. 776 00:42:13,060 - > 00:42:17,380 Because, like you said, unless people enjoy the frustrations 777 00:42:17,380 - > 00:42:20,420 that go along with having an unorganized, unstructured 778 00:42:20,580 - > 00:42:25,860 workflow and you like doing these ad hoc tasks, then maybe 779 00:42:25,860 - > 00:42:28,660 you don't want to take the assessment and you should leave 780 00:42:28,660 - > 00:42:29,380 things as is. 781 00:42:29,620 - > 00:42:34,660 But I think we're we're getting to a point where the capability 782 00:42:34,660 - > 00:42:40,100 of some of these new AI-powered tools are only as good as the 783 00:42:40,100 - > 00:42:41,460 inputs that you feed it, right? 784 00:42:41,540 - > 00:42:45,460 And so the better you are at organizing those inputs, the 785 00:42:45,460 - > 00:42:48,900 more likely you'll be able to capitalize on some of the gains 786 00:42:48,900 - > 00:42:50,580 that you will have from using these tools. 787 00:42:51,220 - > 00:42:55,060 If you leave it with gaps, things not structured correctly, 788 00:42:55,220 - > 00:42:56,580 it's just gonna give you garbage. 789 00:42:56,660 - > 00:43:00,020 It's not gonna tell you what you need to know to make the right 790 00:43:00,020 - > 00:43:00,820 decision. 791 00:43:01,220 - > 00:43:04,020 SPEAKER_00: You're gonna look at those responses and go, what in 792 00:43:04,020 - > 00:43:05,220 the world is this talking about? 793 00:43:05,380 - > 00:43:06,580 What a waste of time. 794 00:43:06,820 - > 00:43:07,780 And you're right. 795 00:43:07,940 - > 00:43:11,860 There's I think we've heard it a thousand times, you know, 796 00:43:12,020 - > 00:43:13,540 garbage in, garbage out. 797 00:43:13,620 - > 00:43:16,900 And that is it's very true in a lot of scenarios. 798 00:43:16,980 - > 00:43:21,140 And I think we've positioned something that is asking the 799 00:43:21,140 - > 00:43:24,340 questions that we sometimes fail to ask internally. 800 00:43:24,660 - > 00:43:29,140 And we've packaged it in a place for us to understand, you know, 801 00:43:29,380 - > 00:43:31,060 what does it feel like on our team? 802 00:43:31,220 - > 00:43:34,740 Are we all, you know, I I aliken the things that we're talking 803 00:43:34,740 - > 00:43:37,060 about now to being on a sports team. 804 00:43:37,220 - > 00:43:39,540 You know, your assessment is that tryout. 805 00:43:39,940 - > 00:43:44,660 Okay, we have a couple of different levels of athleticism 806 00:43:44,660 - > 00:43:46,260 in any work that you're doing. 807 00:43:46,420 - > 00:43:49,220 And it's not just that, like, oh, the senior directors are 808 00:43:49,220 - > 00:43:51,940 stronger than the people that are associate managers. 809 00:43:52,100 - > 00:43:53,540 That's not necessarily the case. 810 00:43:53,700 - > 00:43:56,660 Sometimes it's experience, seniority, etc. 811 00:43:56,980 - > 00:43:59,940 But if you're thinking in the context again of like a team, 812 00:44:00,020 - > 00:44:02,420 you know, hey, uh, let's get these guys over here. 813 00:44:02,500 - > 00:44:05,700 I want them to work on, you know, if I can take some 814 00:44:05,700 - > 00:44:08,580 baseball terms, you know, I want to work them to work on some fly 815 00:44:08,580 - > 00:44:08,900 balls. 816 00:44:08,980 - > 00:44:12,660 I want these guys to do, you know, sprints because these are 817 00:44:12,660 - > 00:44:14,740 the guys we're gonna get to steal bases. 818 00:44:14,900 - > 00:44:16,900 You know, these are the ones that we're gonna get, you know, 819 00:44:16,980 - > 00:44:19,300 our pitchers, let's get our pitchers warming up over there. 820 00:44:19,460 - > 00:44:22,260 Let's get some infielders because we want to do some 821 00:44:22,260 - > 00:44:24,740 strategy on the infield of how they're gonna work together. 822 00:44:24,900 - > 00:44:27,540 And this is this is a little bit of how we need to work with our 823 00:44:27,540 - > 00:44:31,060 teams too, is recognize the strengths and the weaknesses, 824 00:44:31,140 - > 00:44:35,220 you know, in the context of of how our data is organized and 825 00:44:35,220 - > 00:44:38,980 make sure that we are giving the opportunity to lift those people 826 00:44:38,980 - > 00:44:42,660 up and enhance their capabilities so that when 827 00:44:42,660 - > 00:44:47,220 they're delivering their technical role on that project, 828 00:44:48,340 - > 00:44:52,100 it is consistent with how the rest of your team is also 829 00:44:52,100 - > 00:44:53,940 delivering on their projects. 830 00:44:54,100 - > 00:44:55,860 Very important, very important. 831 00:44:55,940 - > 00:44:59,140 And I hope that everyone takes takes some time to think about 832 00:44:59,300 - > 00:45:03,700 what does it feel like, what does it feel like at your 833 00:45:03,700 - > 00:45:04,500 organization? 834 00:45:05,700 - > 00:45:07,220 Is the data accessible? 835 00:45:07,780 - > 00:45:11,780 Are you constantly searching where do these things exist? 836 00:45:12,020 - > 00:45:15,380 Are you constant are you pulling things out that you thought were 837 00:45:15,380 - > 00:45:18,340 sources of truth, and then you come down come to find out that 838 00:45:18,340 - > 00:45:21,380 there were drafts that were never continued? 839 00:45:22,260 - > 00:45:27,300 That were, you know, builds that happen in Monday in Trello and 840 00:45:27,300 - > 00:45:30,020 Smartsheet and Notion that just stopped. 841 00:45:30,420 - > 00:45:32,980 Has a lot of data, but everything stopped because the 842 00:45:32,980 - > 00:45:35,300 people that were inputting the data decided to go somewhere 843 00:45:35,300 - > 00:45:35,540 else. 844 00:45:35,620 - > 00:45:36,420 But you didn't know that. 845 00:45:36,580 - > 00:45:38,100 Why would you have that context? 846 00:45:38,580 - > 00:45:40,340 Are these the things that you're feeling? 847 00:45:41,380 - > 00:45:45,060 These assessments look to elucidate where those challenges 848 00:45:45,060 - > 00:45:45,220 are. 849 00:45:45,940 - > 00:45:48,900 SPEAKER_01: Yeah, I I think a good question to ask um for for 850 00:45:48,900 - > 00:45:54,820 anybody is the flow of information across your company? 851 00:45:55,540 - > 00:46:01,060 Or your team enabling some of the dysfunction across multiple 852 00:46:01,300 - > 00:46:01,860 departments. 853 00:46:02,180 - > 00:46:03,140 SPEAKER_00: Let's say that again. 854 00:46:03,300 - > 00:46:06,260 Is it enabling the dysfunction? 855 00:46:06,420 - > 00:46:10,900 I think a lot of us will say, yes, it is definitely adding to 856 00:46:10,900 - > 00:46:12,100 that dysfunction. 857 00:46:13,140 - > 00:46:15,060 But ask yourselves that. 858 00:46:15,300 - > 00:46:17,300 Well, thanks so much for spending your time with us 859 00:46:17,300 - > 00:46:17,540 today. 860 00:46:17,620 - > 00:46:20,340 Uh, we truly appreciate you being part of the Lean by Design 861 00:46:20,340 - > 00:46:20,900 community. 862 00:46:21,060 - > 00:46:25,060 If this conversation resonated with you, we invite you to check 863 00:46:25,060 - > 00:46:26,980 out my new book that just landed. 864 00:46:27,140 - > 00:46:30,340 We just had a launch on Wednesday that went fantastic. 865 00:46:30,500 - > 00:46:35,460 And we're at this, and I take a candid perspective on the 866 00:46:35,460 - > 00:46:40,580 patterns of operational friction that quietly slowed teams down, 867 00:46:40,980 - > 00:46:46,100 erode trust from leadership and erode morale and what to do 868 00:46:46,100 - > 00:46:46,580 about them. 869 00:46:46,740 - > 00:46:50,100 How do we approach these things so that we can create an 870 00:46:50,100 - > 00:46:55,140 organization that has that data operational structure, that has 871 00:46:55,140 - > 00:46:57,860 that flow, that has that system level thinking. 872 00:46:58,100 - > 00:47:01,220 And if you're ready to take the next step, we invite you to 873 00:47:01,220 - > 00:47:04,180 explore our operational risk assessments that are these are 874 00:47:04,180 - > 00:47:06,900 hybrid engagements where you'll actually work directly with 875 00:47:06,900 - > 00:47:10,260 Lawrence and I to identify, prioritize, and then be able to 876 00:47:10,260 - > 00:47:14,100 clearly communicate the friction points in your organization so 877 00:47:14,100 - > 00:47:17,460 that you can move forward with confidence and alignment. 878 00:47:17,620 - > 00:47:22,340 So don't forget to follow us on Instagram at SciGuy underscore 879 00:47:22,500 - > 00:47:23,300 insights. 880 00:47:23,460 - > 00:47:25,700 That's uh my braided page. 881 00:47:25,780 - > 00:47:30,500 And you can now watch our podcast on YouTube at Lean by 882 00:47:30,580 - > 00:47:31,540 Design Podcast. 883 00:47:31,620 - > 00:47:33,380 You can watch the whole episode. 884 00:47:33,620 - > 00:47:37,300 Me and Lawrence are blenders, probably, that Lawrence will 885 00:47:37,300 - > 00:47:41,620 stick into there to show people that we are real people and we 886 00:47:41,620 - > 00:47:45,700 mess up, but we keep on going and we make adjustments, and we 887 00:47:45,700 - > 00:47:49,060 are just very fortunate and feel blessed that you guys are taking 888 00:47:49,060 - > 00:47:49,860 this journey with us. 889 00:47:50,020 - > 00:47:52,820 All the links are in the show notes, and uh, we're gonna take 890 00:47:52,820 - > 00:47:53,860 a little hiatus. 891 00:47:54,020 - > 00:47:56,820 Lawrence, a lot of big things have been happening outside of 892 00:47:56,820 - > 00:47:57,460 the book. 893 00:47:57,700 - > 00:48:02,340 So I will be moving, I will be welcoming a new addition to our 894 00:48:02,340 - > 00:48:02,900 family. 895 00:48:03,140 - > 00:48:06,820 So a lot of things that are happening, and we will miss out 896 00:48:06,820 - > 00:48:10,740 on being able to give some more insights to our listeners, but 897 00:48:10,740 - > 00:48:14,340 we'll definitely be coming back a little bit in the springtime, 898 00:48:14,580 - > 00:48:18,180 as soon as the six foot tall piles of snow start to melt. 899 00:48:18,340 - > 00:48:19,460 Thanks, Lawrence. 900 00:48:20,180 - > 00:48:20,980 SPEAKER_01: All right, bye.

More from Lean By Design

All episodes →
Explore the best B2B Ops podcasts →
All Lean By Design episodes →