The B2B Podcast Index
IBS Intelligence Global FinTech Interviews

EP1019: Beyond Core Banking: The Rise of the Modern Bank Operating System

IBS Intelligence Global FinTech Interviews · 2026-06-19 · 23 min

Substance score

37 / 100

Five dimensions, 20 points each

Insight Density9 / 20
Originality7 / 20
Guest Caliber10 / 20
Specificity & Evidence7 / 20
Conversational Craft4 / 20

Bhushan Drinka Chamberli, CEO of FINSLI, discusses how modern bank operating systems differ from traditional core banking, why legacy modernization efforts have fallen short, and how a parallel operating system architecture can help banks compete with fintechs without requiring risky core replacements. The conversation covers the evolution from monolithic COBOL systems to modular cloud-native platforms organized around "galaxies" of functionality like payments, ledgers, and trading.

Key takeaways

  • Banks have accumulated dangerous technical debt by layering solutions on top of 30-40 year old COBOL mainframe systems instead of modernizing the core, creating fragility where touching one system breaks others.
  • The modern bank operating system approach uses a parallel architecture with modular "galaxies" (payments, accounts, trading, tokenization) that lets banks add new capabilities without touching legacy systems, similar to installing apps on iOS.
  • AI will become critical for banks to scale operations without proportionally increasing headcount, but must include compliance controls, auditability, and regulatory accountability rather than opaque autonomous decision-making.
  • Fintechs have displaced banks by solving customer problems faster, and traditional banks must address the growing gap between fintech speed and their constrained legacy systems or continue losing business.
  • Banks can transition to modern operating models through parallel systems rather than risky big-bang core replacements, allowing incremental migration while maintaining operational stability.

Topics in this episode

What our scoring noted

Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.

Insight Density

9 / 20

There are some useful ideas - the tokenized deposit vs stablecoin money-multiplier distinction and the 'surround, shrink, exit' migration framework - but much of the episode is padded with generic observations about COBOL mainframes, tech debt, and fintech disruption that any B2B banker already knows. The ratio of insight to filler is low for a 23-minute episode.

banks have like six, seven different uh payment rights. You have that many teams, that many vendors, that many systems. And basically, banks were continuously pushing these products to the customers rather than giving them an experience of money movement.
when you deposit$100 at the bank and um, you know, they receive that, take the deposit, there is a ratio that they have to keep it as a reserve. But the remaining money, let's say for every$100, they can lend $80.

Originality

7 / 20

The tokenized-deposit-vs-stablecoin breakdown (the broken money-multiplier cycle) is a genuinely useful framing that goes slightly beyond standard crypto commentary. However, the rest - COBOL legacy debt, layers of point solutions, iPhone app store analogy for banking platforms - are well-worn industry takes with no new argumentative twist.

with stable coin, that cycle is broken because you deposit, that's it. It stays as a collateral.
Let's create a parallel bank operating system where banks will be able to add new solutions, just like you know, you are in your iPhone, you like an app, you install it, you use it.

Guest Caliber

10 / 20

The guest is a founder-CEO of a relevant banking-infrastructure fintech and demonstrates genuine practitioner knowledge - especially on payment rails, migration risk, and digital asset mechanics - but the interview is heavily self-promotional, and his claims are never stress-tested. He is a credible operator, not a marquee name.

I work for banks, I'm a technologist, and I couldn't see these problems continuously troubling the banks the way they can, they have to uh modernize and innovate.
I have seen banks who have taken over 10 years in their core replacement, right? You know, like think about you know, you start this project in 2016, and now you are completed that one.

Specificity & Evidence

7 / 20

The episode drops a few company names (Square, Stripe, Zell, JP Morgan) and consortium names (carry network, cell network, clearinghouse) as texture, and the $100/$80/$20 reserve ratio is illustrative rather than evidential. The stablecoin market-size figures are vague and unsourced, which undermines what could have been a stronger data point.

like there were like over a trillion dollars of money is moving on the in that one. And uh several billions of dollars has has been stored as stable coins.
it's a carry network, a cell network, and then there is a clearinghouse network that is coming in. And there are like, you know, there are there's one more for credit unions.

Conversational Craft

4 / 20

The host asks four pre-written, headline-level questions with zero follow-up, no pushback, and no probing of any specific claim. The final question - inviting the guest to promote international expansion plans he admits he has no concrete answer to - exemplifies the episode's function as a vendor PR vehicle rather than a substantive interview.

Moving on, uh Finzley is also looking for geographical expansion. Would you want to talk more about that?
Banks have spent years modernizing their technology stacks. Why do many still struggle with legacy constraints? And where have previous transformation efforts fallen short?

Conversation analysis

Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the verbal tics along the way.

Filler words

you know60so54right46uh33like31um20kind of8basically1obviously1

Episode notes

Booshan Rengachari, founder and CEO of Finzly As banks look beyond traditional core modernisation, the industry is increasingly focused on building a modern bank operating system that combines real-time payments, AI-driven intelligence, and connected financial ecosystems. Puja Sharma speaks with Booshan Rengachari, Founder and CEO of Finzly , about overcoming legacy constraints, enabling low-risk transformation, and preparing banks for a future shaped by agentic AI, tokenised assets, and next-generation payment infrastructure.

Full transcript

23 min

Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.

1 00:00:01,840 - > 00:00:04,799 SPEAKER_01: I'm Pujan Shandram of MIBS Intelligence, and you're 2 00:00:04,799 - > 00:00:07,200 listening to the MIBS and IVs podcast. 3 00:00:07,360 - > 00:00:11,199 With me is Bhushan Drinka Chamberli, CEO of FINSLI, a 4 00:00:11,199 - > 00:00:14,880 fintech company based in Shamalit USA, is a banking and 5 00:00:14,880 - > 00:00:18,079 payment technology company that helps financial institutions 6 00:00:18,239 - > 00:00:22,320 modernize their infrastructure through a cloud native platform. 7 00:00:22,800 - > 00:00:26,480 Known for its unified payment hub, FINSLE enables banks to 8 00:00:26,480 - > 00:00:30,480 manage multiple payment rails, improve interoperability, and 9 00:00:30,640 - > 00:00:33,439 accelerate additional transformation while supporting 10 00:00:33,439 - > 00:00:35,920 evolving regulatory and customer demands. 11 00:00:36,159 - > 00:00:40,640 Today we are diving into how evolving ACH regulation that is 12 00:00:40,880 - > 00:00:44,960 automated clearing house, a US electronic payment network that 13 00:00:44,960 - > 00:00:47,119 moves money between bank accounts. 14 00:00:47,520 - > 00:00:50,799 Real-time payment and modern banking infrastructure are 15 00:00:50,799 - > 00:00:52,240 shaping the future of banking. 16 00:00:52,399 - > 00:00:54,159 Welcome to the podcast, Pushin. 17 00:00:55,280 - > 00:00:56,479 SPEAKER_00: Hey, thanks, Puja. 18 00:00:56,640 - > 00:00:57,600 Nice to be here. 19 00:00:58,079 - > 00:01:00,399 SPEAKER_01: Pushan, the industry is increasingly talking about 20 00:01:00,399 - > 00:01:02,799 the rise of modern bank operating system. 21 00:01:03,039 - > 00:01:05,519 What is driving this shift and how does it differ from 22 00:01:05,599 - > 00:01:07,280 traditional core banking model? 23 00:01:08,239 - > 00:01:11,760 SPEAKER_00: So if you look at the banking, the bank has been 24 00:01:11,760 - > 00:01:14,879 using the technology that has been there for the last like 30, 25 00:01:14,959 - > 00:01:15,840 40 years. 26 00:01:16,079 - > 00:01:17,760 Nothing much has changed, right? 27 00:01:17,920 - > 00:01:19,359 Banking is always the banking. 28 00:01:19,439 - > 00:01:22,879 Like, you know, banking does three things in general. 29 00:01:23,200 - > 00:01:27,280 They receive deposits, they lend, and they move money. 30 00:01:27,439 - > 00:01:30,000 These are the three major functions of the bank. 31 00:01:30,079 - > 00:01:32,319 And these functions have not changed, right? 32 00:01:34,719 - > 00:01:39,280 From paper ledgers, they went to system ledger, right? 33 00:01:39,439 - > 00:01:42,480 And then after that, digital banking, online banking came, 34 00:01:42,560 - > 00:01:43,920 and then mobile banking. 35 00:01:44,159 - > 00:01:49,599 So at every revolution, what happened was the systems, the 36 00:01:49,599 - > 00:01:53,040 COBOL mainframe systems, it just remained the same. 37 00:01:53,280 - > 00:01:56,640 And banks continue to create layers and layers on top of 38 00:01:56,640 - > 00:01:56,879 that. 39 00:01:57,040 - > 00:01:59,920 So every time they want to do something, they will create a 40 00:01:59,920 - > 00:02:01,599 solution, they will create a layer. 41 00:02:01,840 - > 00:02:05,519 And what happened was over a period of time, all the systems 42 00:02:05,519 - > 00:02:07,439 became so complex to manage. 43 00:02:07,680 - > 00:02:10,080 Layers and layers and fragmentations. 44 00:02:10,240 - > 00:02:12,719 So they will create solutions and assemble it. 45 00:02:12,800 - > 00:02:16,400 And even if they buy a vendor solution, the vendor has bought 46 00:02:16,400 - > 00:02:19,199 from like five other different mergers and acquisitions. 47 00:02:19,439 - > 00:02:21,439 And it created complexity. 48 00:02:21,680 - > 00:02:23,599 You know, banks couldn't move, right? 49 00:02:23,759 - > 00:02:28,479 So what we all started seeing is that fintech started evolving. 50 00:02:28,560 - > 00:02:30,400 Hey, you know, banks are not doing anything. 51 00:02:30,560 - > 00:02:32,639 Let's do, let's do that job for you. 52 00:02:32,879 - > 00:02:39,280 So fintech started doing the banking services and used banks 53 00:02:39,280 - > 00:02:41,520 as a back-end utility. 54 00:02:41,680 - > 00:02:43,759 And you know, that solved some problems. 55 00:02:43,919 - > 00:02:48,000 And uh players like Square, Stripe, you know, Modern 56 00:02:48,159 - > 00:02:51,439 Pressure, all these things is kind of it became better 57 00:02:51,439 - > 00:02:56,080 solutions for businesses because banks were still doing the same 58 00:02:56,080 - > 00:02:58,400 things they did for several decades. 59 00:02:59,199 - > 00:03:03,360 And um now what you are seeing is that fintechs are becoming 60 00:03:03,360 - > 00:03:04,400 banks, right? 61 00:03:04,960 - > 00:03:08,800 Now almost every fintech in the US is applying for a banking 62 00:03:08,800 - > 00:03:10,800 charter, and they're all becoming banks. 63 00:03:10,960 - > 00:03:14,319 Now the question is, what is the future of the banks? 64 00:03:14,560 - > 00:03:15,039 Right? 65 00:03:15,199 - > 00:03:19,039 That's where the interest the banks are at at this point. 66 00:03:19,199 - > 00:03:22,159 You know, fintechs are becoming banks, banks are still banks. 67 00:03:22,400 - > 00:03:23,840 How can we bridge that gap? 68 00:03:24,000 - > 00:03:26,479 That FinSley is addressing that gap, right? 69 00:03:26,560 - > 00:03:30,000 How can we enable banks to stay ahead, to compete with the 70 00:03:30,000 - > 00:03:35,199 fintechs, to recapture their business of receiving deposits 71 00:03:35,199 - > 00:03:38,719 and moving money and doing that business the way they used to 72 00:03:38,719 - > 00:03:38,960 be? 73 00:03:39,120 - > 00:03:42,639 And that's that's exactly what what the industry needs, because 74 00:03:42,639 - > 00:03:47,360 banks, you know, the communities, the the can the 75 00:03:47,360 - > 00:03:51,039 countries need banks because banks are very highly regulated. 76 00:03:51,280 - > 00:03:54,960 And you know, if I ask you, where do you want to keep your 77 00:03:54,960 - > 00:03:58,400 money, would you like to keep it with Strike, or would you like 78 00:03:58,400 - > 00:03:59,520 to keep with their bank? 79 00:03:59,599 - > 00:04:01,360 You know, you'll say it's a bank. 80 00:04:01,520 - > 00:04:05,840 Um, so I think that's uh that's that's very very uh very 81 00:04:05,840 - > 00:04:06,159 important. 82 00:04:06,479 - > 00:04:10,960 And and and it is very important for banks to address that gap 83 00:04:11,120 - > 00:04:15,120 and quickly address that gap because you know the the kind of 84 00:04:15,280 - > 00:04:18,720 technical debt they have created over a period of period of time, 85 00:04:18,879 - > 00:04:20,079 it's too much. 86 00:04:20,399 - > 00:04:25,600 And uh the key is how can they address that gap faster so that 87 00:04:25,600 - > 00:04:30,480 the gap doesn't continue to increase and start to compete 88 00:04:30,480 - > 00:04:34,079 and start to grow their business and start to uh earn more 89 00:04:34,079 - > 00:04:34,480 revenue? 90 00:04:34,560 - > 00:04:38,639 I think that is more important um in today's economy. 91 00:04:39,439 - > 00:04:41,680 SPEAKER_01: Banks have spent years modernizing their 92 00:04:41,680 - > 00:04:42,800 technology stacks. 93 00:04:42,959 - > 00:04:45,920 Why do many still struggle with legacy constraints? 94 00:04:46,000 - > 00:04:49,360 And where have previous transformation efforts fallen 95 00:04:49,360 - > 00:04:49,759 short? 96 00:04:50,160 - > 00:04:52,720 SPEAKER_00: You know, I guess I think if you look at the way the 97 00:04:52,720 - > 00:04:57,439 banks have operated, right, um they totally rely on um a core 98 00:04:57,439 - > 00:04:58,079 platform. 99 00:04:58,639 - > 00:05:00,879 And uh they built around that one. 100 00:05:00,959 - > 00:05:03,360 You know, a lot of time they get constrained with you know, the 101 00:05:03,600 - > 00:05:06,480 some of the cores they have like very ridiculous contract 102 00:05:06,480 - > 00:05:07,120 agreements. 103 00:05:07,360 - > 00:05:09,920 Then if you do business with them, you cannot do business 104 00:05:09,920 - > 00:05:10,639 with anybody else. 105 00:05:10,720 - > 00:05:13,600 You cannot buy anything else from you know any other 106 00:05:13,600 - > 00:05:14,560 provider, right? 107 00:05:14,959 - > 00:05:18,079 And um, and you know, some of those constraints, and uh and 108 00:05:18,079 - > 00:05:22,160 when they don't have such constraints, um, they will have 109 00:05:22,160 - > 00:05:26,800 a commercial banking solution from a vendor, and then they 110 00:05:26,800 - > 00:05:29,360 will have a consumer banking solution from a different 111 00:05:29,360 - > 00:05:29,839 vendor. 112 00:05:29,920 - > 00:05:32,319 They'll have a mobile banking solution that maybe created in 113 00:05:32,480 - > 00:05:32,800 house. 114 00:05:33,519 - > 00:05:37,199 So all these things you create like you know, layers and 115 00:05:37,199 - > 00:05:40,399 layers, like you can create multiple solutions. 116 00:05:40,800 - > 00:05:43,519 All of these things are doing one thing, right? 117 00:05:43,839 - > 00:05:46,800 They are not trying to solve the customer's problem. 118 00:05:46,959 - > 00:05:51,199 If you look at banks, banks are, you know, they want to seriously 119 00:05:51,199 - > 00:05:55,040 address what is important for their customers, consumers and 120 00:05:55,040 - > 00:05:56,160 businesses, right? 121 00:05:56,639 - > 00:06:00,399 And when they want to address those problems, when they look 122 00:06:00,399 - > 00:06:03,759 back and look at the technology providers, and they are like, 123 00:06:03,839 - > 00:06:06,879 you know, they are not going, they are not delivering what the 124 00:06:06,879 - > 00:06:08,000 banks needed. 125 00:06:08,240 - > 00:06:11,680 So they are in a position where, hey, I need to deliver what my 126 00:06:11,680 - > 00:06:14,079 customers want, and I have these limitations. 127 00:06:14,319 - > 00:06:15,439 Who can help me? 128 00:06:15,680 - > 00:06:18,319 There will be some players, they will just solve one problem and 129 00:06:18,319 - > 00:06:20,639 they will go and say, hey, come and solve my problem. 130 00:06:20,879 - > 00:06:22,720 Three months later, there will be a different problem. 131 00:06:22,800 - > 00:06:24,079 Who can solve this problem? 132 00:06:24,319 - > 00:06:26,639 Let's bring them, let them address this problem. 133 00:06:26,879 - > 00:06:30,720 So over a period of time, they ended up having like so many 134 00:06:30,720 - > 00:06:32,959 vendors, so many point solutions. 135 00:06:33,600 - > 00:06:37,600 And what happens is if you touch one thing, then like 10 other 136 00:06:37,600 - > 00:06:38,879 things is going to fail. 137 00:06:39,600 - > 00:06:42,240 It's that's that's the reality today, okay? 138 00:06:42,480 - > 00:06:46,000 And nobody wants to touch anything, so they just keep it 139 00:06:46,000 - > 00:06:48,879 as it is because they don't want to disturb customers, right? 140 00:06:48,959 - > 00:06:52,160 Because you know, you may want to keep some customers happy and 141 00:06:52,160 - > 00:06:56,399 you touch it, you are going to make someone else unhappy. 142 00:06:56,800 - > 00:06:59,360 And that cycle they don't they totally want to avoid. 143 00:06:59,439 - > 00:07:03,680 That makes them just stay statuscope, right? 144 00:07:03,920 - > 00:07:06,959 The thing is, the demands of the customers don't change. 145 00:07:07,040 - > 00:07:10,000 They keep demanding more and more because you know, um, 146 00:07:10,319 - > 00:07:13,759 fintechs are moving at at the speed of technology, right? 147 00:07:14,000 - > 00:07:18,079 Banks, they are moving at the speed of their people who are 148 00:07:18,079 - > 00:07:18,800 laying on. 149 00:07:18,959 - > 00:07:24,160 And that that that gap is uh it's a serious problem for them. 150 00:07:24,399 - > 00:07:28,879 So as as they as they look at what these specific problems, 151 00:07:29,439 - > 00:07:32,079 and uh what we tell them is hey this is this is one of the 152 00:07:32,079 - > 00:07:35,360 reasons why FinSley, I I work for banks, I'm I'm a 153 00:07:35,360 - > 00:07:38,800 technologist, and I couldn't see these problems continuously 154 00:07:39,040 - > 00:07:42,399 troubling the banks the way they can, they have to uh modernize 155 00:07:42,399 - > 00:07:43,439 and innovate. 156 00:07:43,839 - > 00:07:48,480 And we decided, hey, banks need something, yeah, radically 157 00:07:48,480 - > 00:07:49,600 different solution. 158 00:07:49,759 - > 00:07:54,720 Instead of just continuing down the same path, why don't we just 159 00:07:54,720 - > 00:07:58,720 think fresh, like nothing, apply first principles, think about 160 00:07:58,720 - > 00:08:02,399 what is available today in the in in technology. 161 00:08:02,639 - > 00:08:05,040 And because like technology is so advanced, right? 162 00:08:05,199 - > 00:08:09,680 There is no reason why banks have to get stuck with these 163 00:08:09,680 - > 00:08:10,560 kind of problems. 164 00:08:10,639 - > 00:08:12,959 It's like unbelievably bad. 165 00:08:13,680 - > 00:08:19,759 Um so we said like no, we have to rethink, reimagine, and let's 166 00:08:20,079 - > 00:08:22,879 think about what we can do, right? 167 00:08:23,120 - > 00:08:27,199 One is the legacy systems are going to remain. 168 00:08:27,279 - > 00:08:30,240 Like they don't nobody wants to touch that one because it is so 169 00:08:30,240 - > 00:08:32,320 fragile, nobody wants to touch that one. 170 00:08:32,480 - > 00:08:35,039 And I want to address what my customers need. 171 00:08:35,360 - > 00:08:39,120 And we said, hey, let's create a parallel operating system. 172 00:08:39,279 - > 00:08:43,600 Let's create a parallel bank operating system where banks 173 00:08:43,600 - > 00:08:46,480 will be able to add new solutions, just like you know, 174 00:08:46,559 - > 00:08:50,399 you are in your iPhone, you like an app, you install it, you use 175 00:08:50,399 - > 00:08:50,559 it. 176 00:08:51,279 - > 00:08:54,559 Why don't we give that similar solution for banks? 177 00:08:55,120 - > 00:08:58,399 If the bank has a problem, if there is a solution, just add 178 00:08:58,399 - > 00:09:02,000 it, test, and start serving your customers. 179 00:09:02,480 - > 00:09:07,840 And I think that philosophy, that concept shaped the way uh 180 00:09:08,159 - > 00:09:10,399 FinSley is built, right? 181 00:09:10,639 - > 00:09:13,440 So we built that operating system that has everything like 182 00:09:13,519 - > 00:09:17,919 you know, every banking system needs compliance, audit, 183 00:09:18,159 - > 00:09:21,440 documentations, communication, and all that, all that stuff. 184 00:09:21,600 - > 00:09:25,519 So we built all that stuff, and then on top of that, we created 185 00:09:25,519 - > 00:09:27,039 galaxies of solutions. 186 00:09:27,200 - > 00:09:30,240 So you know, we have payment galaxy to address payment 187 00:09:30,320 - > 00:09:31,600 specific challenges. 188 00:09:31,840 - > 00:09:35,600 So if you go into the payment galaxy, payment systems, on the 189 00:09:35,600 - > 00:09:40,000 other side, the legacy systems, you have ACH system, ACH team, 190 00:09:40,159 - > 00:09:44,720 ACH experience, wire system, wire team, wire experience. 191 00:09:44,879 - > 00:09:48,000 And banks have like six, seven different uh payment rights. 192 00:09:48,080 - > 00:09:51,519 You have that many teams, that many vendors, that many systems. 193 00:09:51,759 - > 00:09:55,120 And basically, banks were continuously pushing these 194 00:09:55,120 - > 00:09:58,960 products to the customers rather than giving them an experience 195 00:09:58,960 - > 00:10:00,000 of money movement. 196 00:10:00,240 - > 00:10:02,720 Hey, let's start with what the customers want. 197 00:10:02,799 - > 00:10:04,720 They just want to move the money. 198 00:10:04,879 - > 00:10:07,840 Like, you know, when you go to FedEx, you don't have to tell 199 00:10:07,840 - > 00:10:11,600 them, I want this to be shipped by flight or by train or by 200 00:10:11,600 - > 00:10:12,159 track. 201 00:10:12,399 - > 00:10:13,679 I just want to move the money. 202 00:10:13,759 - > 00:10:17,360 Just tell me where you want to move, how fast you want it, and 203 00:10:17,360 - > 00:10:18,320 then here is the fee. 204 00:10:18,399 - > 00:10:20,240 That's all the customer cares about. 205 00:10:20,399 - > 00:10:24,639 So we started from there, and then we created that the galaxy, 206 00:10:24,720 - > 00:10:28,720 which is payments, ACH, wires, instant payments, international 207 00:10:28,720 - > 00:10:32,720 payments, all of them got bundled in that payment galaxy. 208 00:10:32,960 - > 00:10:35,120 Next, we looked at ledgers. 209 00:10:35,279 - > 00:10:39,440 You know, we created accounts galaxies for everything that you 210 00:10:39,440 - > 00:10:42,320 want to keep track of, debits, crits, balances, all those 211 00:10:42,320 - > 00:10:44,879 things went into the ledger galaxy. 212 00:10:45,039 - > 00:10:47,440 And then foreign exchange trade, the comment, you know, the 213 00:10:47,600 - > 00:10:50,480 treasury capabilities, the advanced customers, uh, 214 00:10:50,639 - > 00:10:54,080 corporate customers they need, it all went into Trade Galaxy. 215 00:10:54,159 - > 00:10:57,120 And then we have token galaxy for blockchain, right? 216 00:10:57,279 - > 00:11:01,519 So at the end, what we did was we created the solutions so 217 00:11:01,679 - > 00:11:06,159 banks can assemble all these galaxies, create the stores, and 218 00:11:06,159 - > 00:11:07,360 create their own universe. 219 00:11:07,679 - > 00:11:11,919 Because every bank, their needs, their business is different. 220 00:11:12,159 - > 00:11:15,600 And we decided, hey, let the bank build their own universe, 221 00:11:15,759 - > 00:11:17,519 build their bank the way they want it. 222 00:11:17,679 - > 00:11:22,320 So that's how our bank operating system is helping our banks to 223 00:11:22,320 - > 00:11:24,639 compete uh with any players, right? 224 00:11:24,720 - > 00:11:28,639 Today, yeah, even yeah, a regional bank can compete with 225 00:11:28,639 - > 00:11:29,279 JP Mode. 226 00:11:29,519 - > 00:11:32,559 That's unbelievably great thing that's happening. 227 00:11:32,720 - > 00:11:35,679 And uh we are we are extremely proud of what we are building 228 00:11:35,679 - > 00:11:35,840 here. 229 00:11:36,240 - > 00:11:38,159 SPEAKER_01: That could ideally be a pull code. 230 00:11:38,399 - > 00:11:41,600 AI adoption is obviously accelerating across banking. 231 00:11:41,679 - > 00:11:45,440 What role will AI and agent tech capabilities play within the 232 00:11:45,440 - > 00:11:47,600 modern bank operating system? 233 00:11:48,080 - > 00:11:52,720 SPEAKER_00: Yeah, I think AI is is uh you know is is very 234 00:11:52,720 - > 00:11:53,279 important, right? 235 00:11:53,360 - > 00:11:56,720 Today, nothing is going to be great without AI. 236 00:11:57,039 - > 00:12:00,320 And I think what I'm excited about AI is a few things, right? 237 00:12:00,399 - > 00:12:04,799 One is how AI can help bankers do their job better. 238 00:12:04,960 - > 00:12:08,000 You know, for example, how it can accelerate some of the 239 00:12:08,000 - > 00:12:12,000 payment investigations, reconciliations, and uh, you 240 00:12:12,000 - > 00:12:13,840 know, general operations work, right? 241 00:12:14,000 - > 00:12:19,200 Because now tomorrow, let's say you want to triple your payment 242 00:12:19,200 - > 00:12:23,039 volume, are you going to add uh that many number of people to 243 00:12:23,039 - > 00:12:24,240 support that volume? 244 00:12:24,480 - > 00:12:29,200 Or are you going to use AI and start doing more intelligent 245 00:12:29,200 - > 00:12:33,200 work and use that intelligence to enable your bank operations, 246 00:12:33,360 - > 00:12:33,679 right? 247 00:12:34,000 - > 00:12:36,879 And when you do that, I think one of the most important things 248 00:12:36,879 - > 00:12:39,120 is how can you still stay compliant? 249 00:12:39,360 - > 00:12:44,720 Because when the bank regulators come and question your processes 250 00:12:44,960 - > 00:12:48,240 and uh you know general workflows and other stuff, you 251 00:12:48,240 - > 00:12:51,120 cannot tell, hey, AI made the decision. 252 00:12:51,200 - > 00:12:54,399 You know, you that's that's not a good answer to give to 253 00:12:54,399 - > 00:12:55,120 regulators. 254 00:12:55,279 - > 00:12:59,440 And you need to be able to ensure the AI is doing its job 255 00:12:59,440 - > 00:12:59,840 correctly. 256 00:12:59,919 - > 00:13:03,919 So it is important that whatever that we are doing in AI within 257 00:13:03,919 - > 00:13:06,799 the bank is compliant and regulated, you know. 258 00:13:07,039 - > 00:13:10,639 Banks are still taking accountability and take 259 00:13:10,639 - > 00:13:13,679 responsibility for the decisions made by the AI. 260 00:13:13,759 - > 00:13:16,639 It is just only going to get better, right? 261 00:13:16,879 - > 00:13:22,799 So that part is going to help primarily banks do the job 262 00:13:22,799 - > 00:13:25,759 better, enhance their operations capabilities. 263 00:13:26,080 - > 00:13:32,399 And then the next angle in AI is how can banks help their 264 00:13:32,399 - > 00:13:35,360 customers do better business with that, right? 265 00:13:35,519 - > 00:13:39,600 How can if the if a customer wants to connect from cloud to 266 00:13:39,600 - > 00:13:43,120 the bank and then you know do some enquiries and data 267 00:13:43,120 - > 00:13:46,720 investigations and create a summary or you know, anything 268 00:13:46,720 - > 00:13:51,120 that you know, any alumni thinks that they want to do, they 269 00:13:51,120 - > 00:13:55,120 should be able to do it from cloud or chat GPT or any AA 270 00:13:55,120 - > 00:13:56,639 agent they have, right? 271 00:13:56,960 - > 00:13:59,840 So that angle is becomes important. 272 00:13:59,919 - > 00:14:04,159 And when you do that, now the question is how do you know it 273 00:14:04,159 - > 00:14:09,360 is the customer is doing the job because now AI agents are doing 274 00:14:09,360 - > 00:14:12,000 it, and you know, the customer is going to say, Hey, I didn't 275 00:14:12,000 - > 00:14:12,960 authorize this one. 276 00:14:13,120 - > 00:14:16,960 And how do you prove that they are the one authorize the agent 277 00:14:17,039 - > 00:14:17,919 to do the job? 278 00:14:18,080 - > 00:14:22,080 So it becomes very important for the banks to kind of ensure 279 00:14:22,080 - > 00:14:24,720 there are controls and auditability and traceability, 280 00:14:24,879 - > 00:14:30,159 everything is in place so that they can ensure that the AI is 281 00:14:30,159 - > 00:14:31,600 helping their customers better. 282 00:14:31,679 - > 00:14:35,679 And I think the way, you know, if if any bank is not on AI, I 283 00:14:35,679 - > 00:14:39,200 think they are going to be falling behind further. 284 00:14:39,440 - > 00:14:44,559 And I think, you know, it is it's important that every bank 285 00:14:44,559 - > 00:14:49,679 has an AI strategy for their own operations team and for their 286 00:14:49,679 - > 00:14:50,559 customers. 287 00:14:50,960 - > 00:14:53,759 SPEAKER_01: Many banks want to modernize but are wary of 288 00:14:53,759 - > 00:14:56,080 large-scale uh core replacements, right? 289 00:14:56,159 - > 00:14:59,759 Uh, how can institution transition to a modern operating 290 00:14:59,759 - > 00:15:04,000 model without taking on significant migration risk? 291 00:15:04,399 - > 00:15:07,039 SPEAKER_00: Yeah, so I think that's that's one of the common 292 00:15:07,039 - > 00:15:09,200 problems that we see across the banks, right? 293 00:15:09,279 - > 00:15:13,279 Because you know, as I told you before, the systems that have 294 00:15:13,279 - > 00:15:17,519 been created over the la like the last few couple of decades 295 00:15:17,759 - > 00:15:21,039 is kind of layered, layered, fragmented, and complex. 296 00:15:21,200 - > 00:15:22,639 Nobody wants to touch that. 297 00:15:22,799 - > 00:15:25,120 And if you want to touch it, you're going to break it. 298 00:15:25,360 - > 00:15:28,639 And if you're replacing that means it is like it's 299 00:15:28,639 - > 00:15:29,519 impossible. 300 00:15:29,759 - > 00:15:33,919 So I have seen banks who have taken over 10 years in their 301 00:15:33,919 - > 00:15:34,960 core replacement, right? 302 00:15:35,039 - > 00:15:38,480 You know, like think about you know, you start this project in 303 00:15:38,480 - > 00:15:42,240 2016, and now you are completed that one. 304 00:15:42,320 - > 00:15:46,399 By the time you're done, the industry has moved so much, and 305 00:15:46,399 - > 00:15:49,600 there are so many other advanced technologies, and now you are 306 00:15:49,600 - > 00:15:51,679 again, you know, catching up, right? 307 00:15:52,000 - > 00:15:55,120 So that is never the right option. 308 00:15:55,519 - > 00:16:00,000 And um, what we do is we we recommend our banks to take this 309 00:16:00,000 - > 00:16:00,559 approach. 310 00:16:00,879 - > 00:16:04,000 Surround the core, shrink it. 311 00:16:04,159 - > 00:16:07,039 So surround the core, you're running a parallel bank 312 00:16:07,039 - > 00:16:11,600 operating system and let it do what you want to do to your 313 00:16:11,600 - > 00:16:12,000 customers. 314 00:16:12,080 - > 00:16:14,080 Like now, how you want to help your customers. 315 00:16:14,240 - > 00:16:17,200 If you want to launch a new product or you want to launch a 316 00:16:17,200 - > 00:16:21,120 new capability, or you want to serve a new segment of the 317 00:16:21,120 - > 00:16:25,840 customers, start doing that in this parallel operating system, 318 00:16:26,080 - > 00:16:26,399 right? 319 00:16:26,960 - > 00:16:29,919 You know, some banks, some of the banks they say, you know, 320 00:16:30,159 - > 00:16:34,639 um, I want to start offering this new API capabilities for 321 00:16:35,200 - > 00:16:35,759 payments. 322 00:16:35,919 - > 00:16:37,200 Okay, start there. 323 00:16:37,360 - > 00:16:41,440 And then migrate the other, you know, other channels to FinSt. 324 00:16:41,759 - > 00:16:43,759 And then migrate the incoming way. 325 00:16:43,919 - > 00:16:47,679 So there are different ways that you kind of slice and dice, but 326 00:16:47,679 - > 00:16:53,279 um, the the Q core idea is start as a parallel core and then 327 00:16:53,279 - > 00:16:55,279 start moving one piece at a time. 328 00:16:55,600 - > 00:16:59,279 Now you you are kind of slowly shrinking that one, and then you 329 00:16:59,279 - > 00:17:01,519 can exit out of that legacy system. 330 00:17:01,840 - > 00:17:04,000 So surround, shrink, and exit. 331 00:17:04,079 - > 00:17:08,079 So that's the that's the strategy banks should adopt um 332 00:17:08,079 - > 00:17:10,640 when they want to modernize their work platform. 333 00:17:10,960 - > 00:17:13,759 SPEAKER_01: Looking ahead, how will emerging innovations such 334 00:17:13,759 - > 00:17:17,839 as real-time payments, tokenize deposit, and stable coins shape 335 00:17:17,839 - > 00:17:22,559 the future of bank operating system and the broader banking 336 00:17:22,559 - > 00:17:23,279 ecosystem? 337 00:17:23,519 - > 00:17:25,920 SPEAKER_00: Yeah, so real-time payments is not any more modern, 338 00:17:26,000 - > 00:17:26,160 right? 339 00:17:26,319 - > 00:17:28,720 That um you know, most of the countries they have real-time 340 00:17:28,720 - > 00:17:29,519 payments. 341 00:17:29,920 - > 00:17:33,680 And um, you know, um ES is different. 342 00:17:33,759 - > 00:17:35,920 Okay, it's it's one of the largest economies. 343 00:17:36,400 - > 00:17:38,799 If you ask, has there been your real-time payments? 344 00:17:38,960 - > 00:17:39,440 Kind of. 345 00:17:39,680 - > 00:17:42,480 You know, we have had Zell, we have had, you know, the debit 346 00:17:42,480 - > 00:17:43,920 card is always real-time. 347 00:17:44,160 - > 00:17:47,519 If you look at other economies, they never had this such thing. 348 00:17:47,759 - > 00:17:51,920 And they moved from, you know, check cash to directly to 349 00:17:51,920 - > 00:17:53,839 real-time payment systems. 350 00:17:54,160 - > 00:17:58,559 So the the real-time payment systems today in the US is 351 00:17:58,559 - > 00:18:00,880 addressing some new use cases, right? 352 00:18:01,039 - > 00:18:02,480 That that is very important. 353 00:18:02,960 - > 00:18:05,920 Now, almost all the banks they know that they need real-time 354 00:18:05,920 - > 00:18:06,319 payments. 355 00:18:06,559 - > 00:18:10,240 But what is happening is more than the real-time payments, 356 00:18:10,480 - > 00:18:15,920 what's happening beyond these traditional payment rates is 357 00:18:15,920 - > 00:18:19,519 that blockchains and stable coins and tokenized deposits, 358 00:18:19,599 - > 00:18:19,839 right? 359 00:18:20,079 - > 00:18:24,640 Add that, yeah, like all these things are making so much of a 360 00:18:24,640 - > 00:18:25,279 difference. 361 00:18:25,519 - > 00:18:29,200 Uh, think about tokenized deposits and stable coins. 362 00:18:29,279 - > 00:18:33,119 I think you know, there are significant differences between 363 00:18:33,119 - > 00:18:35,759 both these digital assets, right? 364 00:18:36,079 - > 00:18:40,319 Stable coins are really good when you want to transfer money 365 00:18:40,319 - > 00:18:42,240 from you know one country to another country. 366 00:18:42,400 - > 00:18:46,480 Like it's uh, you know, the money is collateralized and it 367 00:18:46,480 - > 00:18:48,640 is reserved and kept in treasury. 368 00:18:48,720 - > 00:18:50,400 So your money is there, right? 369 00:18:50,640 - > 00:18:53,759 And um, the money is going to move from one place to another 370 00:18:53,759 - > 00:18:56,880 place very quickly and you without any intermediaries or 371 00:18:56,880 - > 00:18:57,359 anything. 372 00:18:57,599 - > 00:19:02,079 But the problem is the money is going to stay with treasury that 373 00:19:02,079 - > 00:19:06,559 cannot be used for the money cycle that is generally created 374 00:19:06,559 - > 00:19:07,119 by the banks. 375 00:19:07,279 - > 00:19:11,920 When you deposit$100 at the bank and um, you know, they receive 376 00:19:11,920 - > 00:19:14,799 that, take the deposit, there is a ratio that they have to keep 377 00:19:14,799 - > 00:19:16,079 it as a reserve. 378 00:19:16,319 - > 00:19:20,559 But the remaining money, let's say for every$100, they can lend 379 00:19:20,559 - > 00:19:20,799 $80. 380 00:19:21,359 - > 00:19:22,799 They keep that$20. 381 00:19:23,440 - > 00:19:25,759 And the remaining$80 they can lend, right? 382 00:19:25,839 - > 00:19:27,519 They earn interest on that front. 383 00:19:27,759 - > 00:19:30,400 Now that money they are lending, it is going to come back as a 384 00:19:30,400 - > 00:19:34,000 deposit, maybe in the same bank or maybe as some other bank. 385 00:19:34,160 - > 00:19:36,240 So that cycle continues, right? 386 00:19:36,559 - > 00:19:41,359 But with stable coin, that cycle is broken because you deposit, 387 00:19:41,440 - > 00:19:42,160 that's it. 388 00:19:42,480 - > 00:19:44,400 It stays as a collateral. 389 00:19:45,200 - > 00:19:50,720 So banks were very concerned about the stable coins, you 390 00:19:50,720 - > 00:19:54,799 know, like there were like over a trillion dollars of money is 391 00:19:55,039 - > 00:19:56,400 moving on the in that one. 392 00:19:56,960 - > 00:20:03,039 And uh several billions of dollars has has been stored as 393 00:20:03,039 - > 00:20:03,920 stable coins. 394 00:20:04,240 - > 00:20:09,039 And that means this much of money is moving from the banking 395 00:20:09,039 - > 00:20:13,440 system to to a treasury, which is going to be you know just 396 00:20:13,599 - > 00:20:17,440 earning some interest, but not going to help the banks to do 397 00:20:17,440 - > 00:20:18,880 their uh business well. 398 00:20:19,200 - > 00:20:22,640 So banks came out with this tokenized deposit, which is 399 00:20:22,640 - > 00:20:23,440 awesome, right? 400 00:20:23,599 - > 00:20:27,039 Now they said, hey, I'm going to I'm going to give you the 401 00:20:27,039 - > 00:20:31,680 similar characteristics of a blockchain payment or a 402 00:20:31,680 - > 00:20:36,000 stablecoin payment, but I'm going to continue using these 403 00:20:36,000 - > 00:20:37,440 money cycles, right? 404 00:20:37,680 - > 00:20:41,200 The$100 deposited is still$100 deposited. 405 00:20:41,359 - > 00:20:44,640 Instead of keeping in a traditional ledger, I'm going to 406 00:20:44,640 - > 00:20:46,640 keep them in a blockchain ledger. 407 00:20:46,960 - > 00:20:52,799 I can still lend$80 to other other customers. 408 00:20:52,880 - > 00:20:54,799 And that money cycle continues. 409 00:20:55,039 - > 00:20:58,240 But it all at the same time, it brings the characteristics of 410 00:20:58,240 - > 00:20:59,599 the stablecoin, right? 411 00:20:59,839 - > 00:21:04,880 So there are several consortiums of the banks in the US, right? 412 00:21:04,960 - > 00:21:08,640 And it's a carry network, a cell network, and then there is a 413 00:21:08,640 - > 00:21:10,480 clearinghouse network that is coming in. 414 00:21:10,640 - > 00:21:12,880 And there are like, you know, there are there's one more for 415 00:21:12,880 - > 00:21:13,839 credit unions. 416 00:21:14,000 - > 00:21:18,720 So all these consortiums, what it's going to do is the deposits 417 00:21:18,880 - > 00:21:22,400 that is, you know, that is received as a tokenized deposits 418 00:21:22,640 - > 00:21:25,839 can be moved to any account in the network through this 419 00:21:25,839 - > 00:21:27,200 blockchain instantly, right? 420 00:21:27,279 - > 00:21:30,480 So the real-time payment capabilities uh come into this 421 00:21:30,480 - > 00:21:31,920 uh blockchain network. 422 00:21:32,079 - > 00:21:35,839 Um, the next step, what what I'm more excited, interested in 423 00:21:36,160 - > 00:21:39,279 solving the problem is that how can we connect all these 424 00:21:39,279 - > 00:21:39,759 networks? 425 00:21:39,839 - > 00:21:43,279 Because let's say I'm in one network, I'm in one consortium, 426 00:21:43,519 - > 00:21:45,279 you are in a different consortium. 427 00:21:45,440 - > 00:21:49,680 How can I send money from my bank to your bank instantly 428 00:21:49,680 - > 00:21:53,680 through the similar same blockchain tokenized deposit 429 00:21:53,680 - > 00:21:54,319 network, right? 430 00:21:54,480 - > 00:21:57,359 So that is that is going to be interesting uh development that 431 00:21:57,359 - > 00:21:58,160 is going to happen. 432 00:21:58,319 - > 00:22:01,200 But I think you know the tokenized deposit stablecoin is 433 00:22:01,200 - > 00:22:01,839 here to stay. 434 00:22:02,000 - > 00:22:07,279 I was not a big fan of the crypto, um, but I think the once 435 00:22:07,279 - > 00:22:10,640 they tokenized deposits development started, I got more 436 00:22:10,640 - > 00:22:11,119 excited. 437 00:22:11,200 - > 00:22:14,880 I think that is going to be the biggest difference, and uh it's 438 00:22:14,880 - > 00:22:19,039 going to encourage more adoption of the digital asset and uh 439 00:22:19,039 - > 00:22:20,000 blockchain money movement. 440 00:22:20,400 - > 00:22:22,640 SPEAKER_01: Moving on, uh Finzley is also looking for 441 00:22:22,640 - > 00:22:24,160 geographical expansion. 442 00:22:24,319 - > 00:22:26,000 Would you want to talk more about that? 443 00:22:26,319 - > 00:22:27,759 SPEAKER_00: We have built a great technology, right? 444 00:22:27,839 - > 00:22:31,519 And if you look at the US market, it's the most regulated 445 00:22:31,759 - > 00:22:36,000 and very competitive and highly demanding market in the entire 446 00:22:36,000 - > 00:22:36,240 world. 447 00:22:36,400 - > 00:22:39,519 So if you are solving the biggest problem, then you can 448 00:22:39,519 - > 00:22:41,680 solve any problem anywhere in the world. 449 00:22:41,920 - > 00:22:45,759 So we are always very ambitious to grow further. 450 00:22:46,000 - > 00:22:49,119 But I think we are, you know, we we are looking at various 451 00:22:49,119 - > 00:22:49,440 options. 452 00:22:49,599 - > 00:22:53,680 You know, we don't have a clear plan of where exactly it is, but 453 00:22:53,680 - > 00:22:57,039 we'll be growing outside of US very soon. 454 00:22:57,200 - > 00:23:01,279 And uh you can start seeing us more in uh different parts of 455 00:23:01,279 - > 00:23:02,000 the world. 456 00:23:02,480 - > 00:23:05,359 SPEAKER_01: Bhushan Rengachari, CEO Finzley.

More from IBS Intelligence Global FinTech Interviews

All episodes →
Explore the best B2B Finance podcasts →
All IBS Intelligence Global FinTech Interviews episodes →