
Clean Power Hour · 2026-07-02 · 57 min
Key moments - from our scoring
Substance score
56 / 100
Five dimensions, 20 points each
Carport solar projects demand a different engineering and execution discipline than rooftop solar, and this episode walks through why. Kyle Sinclair (Sinclair Design Engineering), James Strizki (Genmounts Renewable Energy Holdings), and Matt Boyce (Engineered Solutions) explain that the core challenge isn't solar - it's the heavy construction, foundation work, and subsurface unknowns that can silently destroy project margins. Tim Montague frames the core problem: one wrong soil assumption, one overlooked structural detail, one steel price swing, or one unexpected underground obstruction can wipe out margin; all together, they sink companies. The panel outlines a structured workflow: preliminary geotechnical studies and engineering upfront; finite element analysis and independent structural review; detailed site due diligence including utility conflicts and prior construction records; and rigorous internal design review to ensure long-term durability and manufacturability. Real-world examples illustrate how projects can unravel on site - hidden voids, demolished parking structures underneath, high water tables, and prevailing wage crews sitting idle while foundation issues are solved. The episode targets EPCs bidding their first carport, owners evaluating these assets, and developers weighing the opportunity. It's required listening for anyone building parking structures that produce electricity.
Rooftop solar is relatively forgiving; carports demand a higher level of heavy construction, detailed geotechnical analysis, foundation engineering, and careful planning for subsurface unknowns like soil conditions, utilities, and buried obstructions that can silently destroy margins if overlooked.
Invest in preliminary engineering and geotechnical studies upfront to provide an accurate bid based on validated information. Kyle Sinclair notes repeat buyers recoup these costs at around a 30% close rate, making the initial engineering spend cost-effective.
Foundation issues are the hardest part nearly 100% of the time, including unexpected soil conditions inconsistent with initial assumptions, buried obstructions like old parking structure remnants, four-foot voids from demolished utilities, high water tables, and utilities (electrical, gas, water, sewer, communications) that weren't properly mapped before drilling begins.
Kyle Sinclair recommends coordinating between the structural engineering (PE specification) and procurement teams to find quicker, more cost-effective alternatives - such as welding additional gussets, adding more bracing, or using higher-yield-strength materials - that meet the same performance requirements but avoid long mill lead times.
Speaking with facility maintenance directors and long-time building staff who have observed the site's behavior over years, plus locating existing surveys and construction records (including plans from demolished structures), often yields more actionable insight than soil borings alone, especially for foundation design.
Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.
The episode contains a handful of genuinely useful, non-obvious operational insights - cost ranges for foundation drilling, the informal pre-construction site walk, and the pipeline delay caused by restamping modified draw packages - but large portions are repetitive
do your due diligence
restatements rather than new ideas. The 57-minute runtime dilutes the density considerably.
The core message - foundations are the hardest part, do due diligence before you bid - is industry conventional wisdom repeated in multiple ways. Kyle's critique of commission-based sales reps and his refusal to act as a project financier are the most distinctive takes, but there is nothing truly contrarian or first-principles.
my company name is Sinclair Designs and Engineering, not Sinclair Community Credit Union
I'm a true believer that there shouldn't be commissions tied to these types of projects
All three guests are genuine practitioners - a racking manufacturer/CEO, a field installation director, and a PE with 27-state licensure and a heavy construction background - who have clearly done the work and speak from direct experience rather than theory. They are not high-profile industry names and represent mid-sized niche firms, which caps the score.
He holds a PE license in 27 states, and he reviews projects from an independent standpoint
my background before I traded in my boots for a calculator was I have poured 100,000 yards of concrete
The episode is notably concrete: specific soil types, named states, real dollar figures per drilled hole, per-watt cost impact, and vivid field anecdotes (four-foot brick heating-duct voids, 30-foot helical piles in Newark muck, six-to-eight feet of uncompacted fill in Minnesota) give operators genuine reference points. A few areas remain hand-wavy on total project cost structure.
when drilling through Michigan clay with no obstructions, we can anticipate paying $800 per drilled hole...if we hit hard shale at four to six feet deep...that price can jump up to $2,500 per hole...This can easily add 60k to the equation, and that's a 12 cent per watt flex
we found out that there were four foot voids underneath the parking lot that were previous heating ducts made of brick
Tim asks practical, relevant questions that yield useful answers and he introduces a helpful framing device (the double-bind of worst-case pricing), but he rarely pushes back, challenges promotional claims, or follows a thread deeper when a guest gives a vague answer. The remark 'you guys are making my job very easy' is emblematic of a facilitative rather than probing style.
if our industry could avoid one problem. What would the three of you identify as one problem to avoid?
you can expect to spend 2x on a price per watt, or 3x sometimes on a price per watt on a carport
Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the words that came up most.
Solar carport installation costs can swing by 12 cents per watt before a single panel goes up. Kyle Sinclair, CEO and co-founder of SDE (Sinclair Designs and Engineering), James Strizki, Project Manager and CFO of GenMounts and Renewable Energy Holdings, and Matt Boyce, a PE licensed in 27 states and Principal Engineer at Engineered Solutions, join Tim Montague to break down exactly how carport projects are won and lost. Between them, they have engineered, manufactured, reviewed, and installed hundreds of megawatts of solar structures. This webinar covers the full arc of a carport project from initial bid to commissioning, with a focus on where costs blow up and what to do before you break ground to prevent it. Here is what you will learn in this conversation about solar carport installation and commercial carport project execution: Find out why experienced rooftop EPCs get surprised when they move into carports. Carport structures run 25 feet tall, require serious drilling and concrete work, and the average project size is around half a megawatt, with 100 cubic yards of concrete per site. You will learn how to structure the due diligence process before a single hole is drilled.
Transcribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.
1 - > Kyle Sinclair: So it's really critical that when something 2 - > does happen in the field, which it does every time, you know 3 - > that you have those plan B's, you know, and a lot of the 4 - > carport groups that I've worked with in the past, they do a good 5 - > job of that, of saying, "Hey, okay, here's plan B, here's plan 6 - > C, here's all your different foundation designs, where I've 7 - > found in the industry, where that real gap is, is that okay, 8 - > now these have to be reviewed and added to the draw package 9 - > and restamped, and then the materials then will be modified 10 - > and have to get to the site, so the installation can stay in 11 - > sequence.
The 12 - > intro: clean energy industry is moving fast. The deals are 13 - > getting bigger. The technology is evolving, and the stakes have 14 - > never been higher. Welcome to the Clean Power Hour, the 15 - > podcast for solar storage and microgrid professionals who want 16 - > to stay ahead of it all.
Each week, your host Tim Montague, 17 - > industry advisor and president of Clean Power Consulting Group, 18 - > brings you unfiltered conversations with the leaders 19 - > actually building the energy transition. Now, here's your 20 - > host, Tim Montague. 21 - > Tim Montague: Welcome to Carport Solar Done Right, a clean power 22 - > hour live webinar. I'm Tim Montague, your host.
I've spent 23 - > the last 10 years in the commercial solar industry, and 24 - > if there's one thing I've learned, it's this: some 25 - > projects forgive mistakes. 26 - > Carports do not. One wrong assumption about soil 27 - > conditions, one structural detail overlooked, one steel 28 - > price swing between bid and build, one unexpected conflict 29 - > underground, and any one of those things can wipe out your 30 - > margin. All of them together can sink your company, and yet 31 - > carports are becoming one of the fastest growing and most 32 - > misunderstood segments of commercial solar schools, 33 - > hospitals, manufacturing facilities, corporate campuses, 34 - > municipalities.
Everyone wants covered parking that also 35 - > produces clean electricity. So, if you've ever priced a carport 36 - > project, or you're thinking about betting one, you're going 37 - > to get a lot out of this next hour. The opportunity is 38 - > enormous, but only if you understand how these projects 39 - > actually work. Today's goal isn't to sell you a racking 40 - > system, it's to give you a framework from first bid to 41 - > commissioning, so you can avoid the expensive mistakes, protect 42 - > your margins, and build structures that are still 43 - > standing and producing 50 years from now.
That's why we brought 44 - > together today's panel. Between them, they've engineered, 45 - > manufactured, reviewed, and installed hundreds of megawatts 46 - > of solar structures. It's my pleasure to introduce our panel. 47 - > Kyle Sinclair is CEO and co-founder of Sinclair Designs 48 - > and engineering, SDE, Kyle and his team design and manufacture 49 - > ground mount and carport racking here in America, with a 50 - > reputation for solving hard structural problems instead of 51 - > avoiding them.
Kyle is a US Navy veteran who served as an 52 - > intelligence chief with Navy Special Warfare, and he brings 53 - > the same precision to building solar infrastructure. Kyle, 54 - > welcome. 55 - > Kyle Sinclair: Thank you, Tim. 56 - > Warm welcome to everyone joining the webinar today.
57 - > Tim Montague: James Strizke with is with Genmounts Renewable 58 - > Energy Holdings in Flemington, New Jersey. James lives in the 59 - > field. He's responsible for actually getting these projects 60 - > built, which means he understands exactly where 61 - > engineering drawings meet the reality of ground conditions, 62 - > construction schedules, and change orders. James, great to 63 - > have you.
64 - > James Strizki: Thank you very much for having me. 65 - > Tim Montague: And finally, Matt Boyce is principal engineer at 66 - > Engineered Solutions. Matt has 18 years of general contracting 67 - > experience across commercial, industrial, municipal, and heavy 68 - > highway work, plus 15 years of structural engineering and 69 - > design. He holds a PE license in 27 states, and he reviews 70 - > projects from an independent standpoint, helping owners, 71 - > developers, and EPCs build assets that will perform for 72 - > decades, not just past inspection.
Matt, welcome. 73 - > Matt Boyce: Thank you. Thank you for the opportunity. 74 - > Tim Montague: Wonderful.
Well, let's jump in, gentlemen. Kyle, 75 - > big picture first. Why do experienced EPCs who can build a 76 - > flawless rooftop system still get surprised when they move 77 - > into carports, 78 - > Kyle Sinclair: you know, so to answer your question directly, 79 - > EPCs that are new to installing carports are often surprised by 80 - > that higher level of heavy construction that is required 81 - > with these types of projects. 82 - > Tim Montague: Matt, you're an independent reviewer here, so.
I 83 - > want you next. By the time a project reaches your desk, what 84 - > are the most common engineering mistakes you're already finding 85 - > baked in? 86 - > Matt Boyce: I wouldn't necessarily say that they're 87 - > mistakes, but they could be potential pitfalls that we could 88 - > come up with, because by the time, by the time I see a 89 - > project, we know, like, the really big aspects that affect 90 - > the design are where is it, what are the geographical concerns, 91 - > be it wind load, snow load, the types of soils that we run into, 92 - > so once once I see it, we know all of that, so it's just a 93 - > matter of making sure that the trusted and proven design that 94 - > we have works in a particular location that we're deciding to 95 - > install, the biggest pitfall potential pitfall is everybody 96 - > looks out across the parking lot and says, oh, well, this will be 97 - > perfect for solar, and that's not true.
So, you know, we could 98 - > do our due diligence and get geotechnical studies done, drill 99 - > some test holes, and find out what all is under that beautiful 100 - > parking lot that you have to find out where we could 101 - > potentially have problems, and we try, and we.. it's not that 102 - > we try, we do design for the information that we receive from 103 - > that, but the biggest problem that we could run into is 104 - > unforeseen conditions, we can only, we're only going to drill 105 - > so many holes, and depending on the size of the project, we 106 - > could hit an old foundation, we could hit a sinkhole, or some 107 - > sort of void, we could get bad soils, you know, high plastic 108 - > clays, so we just have to be on the lookout for what we would 109 - > need to do to address that.
So, going back to the pitfall part 110 - > of it, is the developer has got to have contingency in for that, 111 - > because that's the biggest unforeseen condition, 112 - > Tim Montague: indeed. indeed, so James, how much of what Kyle and 113 - > Matt just described to you do you actually see once the crew 114 - > is on site, and where do projects start to experience 115 - > challenges or potentially unravel? 116 - > James Strizki: Projects really start to unravel right from the 117 - > initial steps, basically like any project in any house, and 118 - > anything you do kind of in life, you have to start with a firm 119 - > foundation and then build up from there.
Well, in carports, 120 - > the foundation can be the hardest, you know, is usually 121 - > 99.9% of the time the hardest part of the project, as Matt 122 - > kind of described earlier, if we become across soils that are not 123 - > consistent with what we initially thought they were 124 - > going to be, or we hit obstructions in the ground, or 125 - > we find that there's utilities that weren't necessarily found 126 - > before, you know, it can derail a project really quickly, and 127 - > it's not only that it derails the project quickly from a 128 - > standpoint of not being able to build it, depending on what you 129 - > uncover in the ground, you know, it can actually even kill, 130 - > absolutely kill projects.
I've had that happen to me in the 131 - > past, where I actually, we, you know, we excavated on a project, 132 - > and we found out that there were four foot voids underneath the 133 - > parking lot that were previous heating ducts made of brick, so 134 - > it's once we can get through the foundations and working with 135 - > those, you know, the project is a lot. There's a lot more 136 - > seamless, but the foundations I'd say almost all every time is 137 - > where customers can and ourselves can be derailed from a 138 - > financial perspective, and I guess one other real big point 139 - > is that when you come up across these foundation issues, you 140 - > always have a lot of people and a lot of subcontractors or a lot 141 - > of vendors in line, whether it be concrete or, you know, just 142 - > manpower, and when you have people sitting stagnant at 143 - > prevailing wages, it can exponentially blow up the 144 - > budget.
145 - > Tim Montague: So, if I can summarize, car ports aren't 146 - > harder because they're solar, they're harder because of 147 - > inherent uncertainty in the ground, the structure, and 148 - > potentially the supply chain. 149 - > Although I think that's probably the least of our concerns. So, 150 - > let's move into part two. How a good project actually happens.
151 - > Let's walk a successful project. 152 - > Pretend I'm an EPC who just won my first carport job. What 153 - > happens next, Kyle? Where do we start?
154 - > Kyle Sinclair: I would say that the EPC. That win the most have 155 - > actually spent a little money for preliminary engineering, so 156 - > they can provide an accurate bid based on that validated 157 - > information. So our repeat buyers have a lot of success 158 - > with that strategy, and we can easily recoup some of that 159 - > initial cost when certain projects move forward, so you 160 - > know, if we have kind of a 30% close rate, you know, on these 161 - > bigger jobs, so a lot of that initial engineering costs can be 162 - > recouped at a later date on that 163 - > James Strizki: too, just to add, yeah, and I couldn't agree with 164 - > Kyle more, the beginning due diligence process is paramount 165 - > to any successful project, and I have been fortunate and 166 - > unfortunate to work with people on both ends of that spectrum, 167 - > the people that are willing to put up the due diligence, 168 - > whether to find more soil conditions, to do test pits, to 169 - > do soil borings, to talk to previous building, to talk to 170 - > the maintenance owners or the maintenance directors that 171 - > normally have the most experience with the building, 172 - > and the people that have been there the longest.
The 173 - > information that you can get that's free and just takes time 174 - > to get is usually worth more than anything that you get out 175 - > of a geotech report, specifically when it comes to 176 - > those foundations. The second part of that, which Kyle also 177 - > mentioned, the due diligence of getting plans. Sometimes we have 178 - > surveys that were existent but are not brought to us. I 179 - > actually had a project just two weeks ago that a customer I 180 - > asked again, I was like, "You have any records of a previous 181 - > server or anything?
They then went back to the customer, and 182 - > this is actually upon already drilling foundations, and it was 183 - > over an existing parking structure, like an actual 184 - > parking garage that was demolished. He was then able to 185 - > locate the site plans and the construction plans of the 186 - > previous car of the previous parking garage, which then at 187 - > that point we had to design on the fly and redesign our 188 - > conceptual drawings to now customize design where the 189 - > foundations were going to go to miss the existing structures, so 190 - > these are all steps that you know unfortunately became 191 - > brought to our attention later, but if they are done initially, 192 - > you can see, you know, 10s, 20s, 30s, 50 1000s of dollars by just 193 - > doing a very, very detailed due diligence process.
I'm sorry, I 194 - > didn't mean to interrupt, but no, no, 195 - > Kyle Sinclair: please, that you know, there's, there's really, 196 - > you know, to add on to James's points, there, you know, there's 197 - > kind of four main processes in our workflow that we work on 198 - > really closely with both Matt and James, you know, first is 199 - > that geotechnical study in engineering, preliminary 200 - > engineering for the foundations to be able to provide some 201 - > upfront cost analysis, and then Matt does a really good job at 202 - > the finite element analysis of the structure against the site 203 - > specific building code requirements.
Following that, we 204 - > go into a full internal design review as a team, because you 205 - > know Matt may specify different grades and gages and yield 206 - > strengths or different profiles of the components to make sure 207 - > that we're engineering these structures for long lifespans, 208 - > so it's very important that our team catches those details and 209 - > that we're procuring the materials and that those batch 210 - > of materials are specified to the exact project, and then the 211 - > last step is, you know, manufacturing product 212 - > deployment, which is mainly from the Sinclair design side, but 213 - > once that project is official, you know, Jen Mounts is going to 214 - > ask those EPCs to issue a deposit to launch the formal 215 - > engineering review.
Everyone's busy this year, you know, the 216 - > commercial space is booming. 217 - > Licensed PES hourly rates are kind of like lawyers fees, so 218 - > when I call Matt or James, you know, I'm like, don't don't talk 219 - > too slowly or drag out the conversations, because we know 220 - > how expensive, you know, the time can be, and once those 221 - > deposits are issued, you know, Matt will review the Geotech 222 - > soil report, which is critical for determining the foundation 223 - > sizes, provide early insight to those design requirements.
What 224 - > size hole needs to be drilled? 225 - > Is there a high risk of underground obstructions? Is 226 - > there limestone, granite, shale, or calishi layers? Also, is 227 - > there a risk of high water tables?
Is that area in a flood 228 - > zone? You know, those sites can have a dramatic impact on the 229 - > overall cost for those foundations, and then next, when 230 - > we do the full structural design review, Matt reviews the 231 - > site-specific load requirements for the FDA, and it lets us know 232 - > early, you know, whether our standard components need 233 - > upgrading. And this is really where things get interesting, 234 - > because we try to prioritize those design decisions with the 235 - > manufacturing and procurement hat, so it's, you know, it's 236 - > easy for the professional engineers to run the couch and 237 - > say, hey, you need this size I beam, but it can be challenging 238 - > on the procurement side, especially with, you know, long 239 - > roll schedule lead times with the mills, so we can often find 240 - > a quicker and more cost-effective option, such as, 241 - > you know, welding additional gussets, or adding more bracing, 242 - > or using higher yield strength materials.
Oftentimes, that 243 - > leads to quicker lead times, and it's more cost-effective for the 244 - > end users, and then kind of those last steps is James and 245 - > his team, you know, plans for all civil underground obstacles, 246 - > such as communication, electrical, gas, water, sewer, 247 - > any prior steel metal obstructions from previous site 248 - > developments, that's very common in a lot of the projects that we 249 - > do. They also work really closely with the electrical 250 - > contractors, so we can design where the conduit runs need to 251 - > be placed, which side in our columns, you know, to add holes 252 - > for for those conduit runs, and then, and then at that point, 253 - > once that's complete, it's it's tailored to the installation 254 - > schedule, and once foundation cages are deployed, we really 255 - > focus on manufacturing hot tip galvanizing and scheduling 256 - > delivery to meet their install requirements, 257 - > Tim Montague: it, it may be obvious to some of our 258 - > listeners, but we're dealing with urban settings for the most 259 - > part here, right, and so you just don't know what was there 260 - > prior to that parking lot, and we are largely talking about 261 - > parking lots, not always, but, but the vast majority, and and 262 - > so it just looks like a parking lot, right, but you have no idea 263 - > what's under the ground five feet down, and so that is a huge 264 - > challenge, which we're going to continue to discuss, probably 265 - > throughout this webinar.
Matt or James, though. Do you want to 266 - > contribute anything else to this discussion right now? This is, 267 - > this is really great. You guys are making my job very easy.
My 268 - > Matt Boyce: part, my part is kind of easy in all of this. I, 269 - > I am the most reactive person, so I hear about projects where 270 - > you know Kyle or James will send me one and say, hey, we just 271 - > want some preliminary ideas on this one. This is some of the 272 - > information that we were able to put together, you know, a lot of 273 - > times again on the soils, James and his team sometimes will 274 - > track down previous, previously done geotech analysis from an 275 - > adjacent property, or whatever, which we can use, you know, just 276 - > to get an idea of the concept of what we're going to see 277 - > underground, but another cautionary thing about 278 - > underground is that again, you know, you look out across the 279 - > parking lot, and you know everybody sees like this like 280 - > nice black top with some light poles or whatever, but and then 281 - > you have the old timer on the property that's been around 282 - > there for 40 years said, well, nobody's, we've never built 283 - > anything here, and there's never been a utility across here, and 284 - > everything should be fine, right?
But we ran into a project 285 - > here recently up in Minnesota, where that parking lot was 286 - > constructed on six or eight feet of fill dirt, which is terrible 287 - > to try to build on. It's usually just thrown in there, especially 288 - > for a parking lot. It's never compacted properly, and it's 289 - > useless to build on, so you know if, if you think that, oh well, 290 - > nothing's ever been built here, we should be fine, that's not 291 - > necessarily the case. So, again, that the reason why these 292 - > conditions are unforeseen is because you have, we have no 293 - > idea until we go out there and put a shovel in the ground, 294 - > Tim Montague: and James and Kyle, I'm curious, how many 295 - > different foundation types do you commonly see with carports?
296 - > Because I, I'm, I'm a relative novice in this particular niche 297 - > space, but how many types of foundations are there. 298 - > James Strizki: I'd say they're typically two types of 299 - > foundations that we usually depend on. The preferred method, 300 - > which is just through the fact of it being as expeditious, and 301 - > for what you're doing, you get very good results from lateral 302 - > resistance and moment capacity is drilled shafts. Drilled 303 - > shafts are basically, you take an auger or a core barrel, you 304 - > drill down, you remove the spoils, you get down to 305 - > undisturbed earth.
The foundation depth is all 306 - > determined based on maths calculations. And then after 307 - > that, you either can do one of a couple things. If it's a clay 308 - > cohesive type soil, you're able to potentially put the 309 - > foundation, the rebar cages, basically suspend them in the 310 - > air with temporary formwork, and then pour the concrete up 311 - > against earth, which is the best, best method from from our 312 - > experience, and due to the fact that you're putting concrete, 313 - > you know, it's basically in direct contact with earth, and 314 - > there's no inner medium, and you're getting skin friction, 315 - > and you're filling all voids.
316 - > It's the best, the best of both worlds. The challenges come when 317 - > you get into non-cohesive soils that are then filling in the 318 - > hole, which can create all sorts of issues. In the past, we've 319 - > had to go anywhere from temporary casings, where you 320 - > have to put in CMP, which is corrugated metal pipe that keeps 321 - > the hole where you then have to insert the foundation cage into, 322 - > keeps it free of debris from the from other dirt falling in, but 323 - > when you do that, you have to make sure that there's no voids 324 - > around the casing that you're leaving in, so you either have 325 - > to compact it or have global fill placed around that casing.
326 - > The next type of foundation would be a spread type footing 327 - > that's usually used when the soil is becoming so non-cohesive 328 - > that it's all collapsing and it's becoming a ginormous hole, 329 - > or if there's obstructions in the ground that you're not able 330 - > to go below a certain depth, and that happens, you know that can 331 - > happen. The last type of foundation I had, which was like 332 - > a hybrid between the two, was we were working in soils that had 333 - > very low bearing capacity.
It was almost like muck and mush in 334 - > the Northeast, near Newark, New Jersey, where it was actually a 335 - > combination of helical piles that were screwed 30 foot into 336 - > the ground, and then were pure cap had a pure cap and were cast 337 - > into the concrete foundation, and that was to prevent 338 - > differential settlement over a period of time. So, there's 339 - > those are typically the three that I see that I've been 340 - > experienced with the most. I always recommend to the customer 341 - > that I try to get anything I can that is available at minimal 342 - > cost and or free 811 dig calls that's public utilities, any 343 - > public utility, when you call into 811 dig or dig jewelry, or 344 - > any of the ones in your area, they will come out and they have 345 - > to mark out public utilities, that is a very good stepping 346 - > point of saying, okay, well, we know we want to put out a 347 - > carport, let's let them at least come out, and they will mark out 348 - > sewer, gas, water, telecom.
You then kind of get an idea of what 349 - > you're looking for. They do not mark out private utilities, but 350 - > at least it gets you a starting point. I think this is probably 351 - > the one comment that I would make that I see the least 352 - > completed in construction with all the people I work with, 353 - > again going back to the due diligence process, once you have 354 - > a drawing that you think is going to be the drawing and the 355 - > foundations that you need to build and the structure you need 356 - > to build, it is best to go out maybe a week prior with a 357 - > skeleton type crew to actually go and do an informal layout, 358 - > and I'm not saying it needs to be survey grade, but it needs to 359 - > go and say, okay, hey, I know I'm going to be drilling a 360 - > foundation in this area, what what obstructions do I actually 361 - > have?
362 - > And you may laugh because I'm talking about, or you may laugh 363 - > at me for what that comment is, because it seems like common 364 - > sense, but even when we put these on plans, when we actually 365 - > go out in the field, they're almost - I'd say almost every 366 - > time there's a curb line, or there's a stepped foundation, 367 - > stepped parking lot, or there's storm sewers, or there's water 368 - > lines, or things that we somehow were not relayed in the field, 369 - > are not relayed into the office when we're doing the initial 370 - > design, and just doing that saves when you deploy having so 371 - > many people sitting around looking at you, asking what to 372 - > do, and that's probably like the one most valuable point I can 373 - > put out for any kind of construction project, is start 374 - > slow and then go from there.
375 - > Kyle Sinclair: Yeah, and we've, we've had quite a bit of, I 376 - > would say, a diverse portfolio of designing foundation cages 377 - > for all sorts of applications, you know, some not even in the 378 - > solar industry, so we've taken a lot of those lessons learned 379 - > from designing foundations for antenna structures, you know, 380 - > satellite tracking systems, and we've been able to apply a lot 381 - > of that to the solar industry with these larger carport 382 - > formats, so it's really critical that when something does happen 383 - > in the field, which it does every time, you know that you 384 - > have those plan B's, you know, and a lot of the.
PowerPoint 385 - > groups that I've worked with in the past, they do a good job at 386 - > that, of saying, "Hey, okay, here's plan B, here's plan C, 387 - > here's all your different foundation designs. Where I've 388 - > found in the industry where that real gap is, is that okay, now 389 - > these have to be reviewed and added to the draw package and 390 - > restamped, and then the materials then will be modified 391 - > and have to get to the site, so the installation can stay in 392 - > sequence, and that's a lot of the gripes and complaints that 393 - > we hear out in the field, you know, from installers working 394 - > with with other groups, so what we really tried to do is focus 395 - > and streamline that process, where you know Matt mentioned 396 - > he's very reactive to those situations, he's ready to take 397 - > those calls, he's ready to review and provide an option.
398 - > And then on the Sinclair side, we're ready to make those 399 - > adjustments on the manufacturing and deploy updated cages out 400 - > quickly to keep the installers on schedule. 401 - > Tim Montague: The Clean Power Hour is brought to you by CPS 402 - > America, maker of North America's number one three-phase 403 - > string inverter, with over 10 gigawatts shipped in the US. The 404 - > CPS product lineup includes string inverters ranging from 25 405 - > kw to 350 kw.
Their flagship inverter, the CPS 350 kw is 406 - > designed to work with solar plants ranging from two 407 - > megawatts to two gigawatts. CPS is the world's most bankable 408 - > inverter brand and is America's number one choice for solar 409 - > plants. Now offering solutions for commercial utility, ESS, and 410 - > balance of system requirements. 411 - > Go to Chint Power systems.
com or call 855-584-7168 to find out 412 - > more. All right, let's move on to part three, where the money 413 - > is won and lost, because two things on our materials about 414 - > this show were pricing and steel, and I want to make good 415 - > on both. So, Kyle, start with soil. You've told me to budget 416 - > for the worst case on geotech for an EPC pricing a bid.
What 417 - > does that actually mean in dollars, and how do you price 418 - > for foundation variability without either getting burned on 419 - > pricing yourself or pricing yourself out of a job, it really 420 - > is a double bind. 421 - > Kyle Sinclair: Yeah, it is a balancing act, but I think it's 422 - > really important to provide that visibility into what those 423 - > worst-case costs could be per foundation. That geotechnical 424 - > report provides a lot of good information, but you never know 425 - > really what you're going to hit underground, and so when, for 426 - > example, when drilling through Michigan clay with no 427 - > obstructions, we can anticipate paying $800 per drilled hole, 428 - > but if we hit hard shale at four to six feet deep, which is very 429 - > common in southern Michigan, that price can jump up to $2,500 430 - > per hole, that adds up quickly on a half a megawatt project 431 - > site, where the drillers have to switch to rock drilling with 432 - > carbide cutters and hook up water lines.
This can easily add 433 - > 60k to the equation, and that's a 12 cent per watt flex, you 434 - > know. So it's, it's just important that that the EPCs 435 - > have visibility into those worst-case scenarios, so they 436 - > don't put themselves in a position. Do we think, "Hey, 437 - > we're going to the site, and we think every hole is probably 438 - > going to require those, those updated costs? Very unlikely, 439 - > but you should have some buffer in a percentage based on that 440 - > geotech report that that gives you a realistic target to chase, 441 - > so having those secondary foundation options is critical, 442 - > and in some circumstances too.
443 - > When you hit high water tables, you know, experience soils that 444 - > are too soft, you know, we have to switch to those spread 445 - > footers designs, and those cages are more expensive, and the 446 - > installers may need to rent additional equipment for 447 - > excavating, and that surface area, you know, this leads to 448 - > more dirt being hauled off the site and has a compounding 449 - > effect with labor time, so you know, just providing that 450 - > visibility is so important.
You mentioned, you know, not pricing 451 - > yourself out of the job in your question, and to be honest, 452 - > sometimes you know pricing ourselves out of the job can be 453 - > intentional on the manufacturer and installer side, you know 454 - > that some of these EPCs want manufacturers to sign contracts 455 - > with delivery deadlines, but we can't even start engineering 456 - > because they haven't selected a solar panel or they want to 457 - > negotiate flexible payment terms over a nine month project 458 - > timeline, and you know my company name is Sinclair Designs 459 - > and Engineering, not Sinclair Community Credit.
Union, so we 460 - > avoid assisting the developers with financing these projects, 461 - > because that's not what we're built to do as manufacturers. So 462 - > we really just come in, you know, vetting these partners, 463 - > you know, we're not going in to sell these. I've never been a 464 - > big fan of selling carports, you know. I'm a true believer that 465 - > there shouldn't be commissions tied to these types of projects, 466 - > because there's already so many variables, and moreover, you 467 - > have a lot of sales reps in the industry that don't have that 468 - > technical expertise or don't really add a lot of value to 469 - > that project development, so I really encourage you, know, the 470 - > folks that are listening in, you know, to do your homework.
Who 471 - > are you having the discussions with about your carport project 472 - > development? Are you speaking, you know, with engineers, and 473 - > are they focused on risk mitigation, or, you know, are 474 - > you relying on someone with a high school diploma who's 475 - > throwing 20% of markup onto the project just because they 476 - > answered the phone that day, so we hear a lot of those gripes 477 - > and complaints from out in the field from other solutions, and 478 - > that's that's something that we're really focused on solving, 479 - > Tim Montague: we're getting some good questions in the Q&A, I 480 - > would encourage the attendees to put your questions in the Q&A, 481 - > and we'll get to as many of those as we can.
When you know 482 - > you think about EPC, and this is for all of you panelists, 483 - > engineering, procurement, and construction, how does how does 484 - > pricing a job break down? It seems to me that there's a lot 485 - > of uncertainty on the front end and less so on procurement and 486 - > construction, but Matt and James talk about this EPC, and and 487 - > where are the prices for a project more firm than others? 488 - > James Strizki: I'll chime in on that, and you know, a lot of 489 - > times when we're selling, then EPC, well, I guess it depends on 490 - > which entity we're ultimately dealing with, and let me kind of 491 - > clear, clear that up, I guess a little bit, when we work with 492 - > customers, we work with customers that usually can 493 - > either sell to an end user to somebody else after that, and 494 - > when it's that case, we don't necessarily know what their 495 - > budget is, or how, what you know, what their project scope 496 - > and what they're selling to their customer.
We have a 497 - > foundation, or we have a carport scope of, they consider us just, 498 - > you know, racking, it's enveloped into racking, you 499 - > know, obviously you'd have engineering design racking, you 500 - > have the electrical side, you have the interconnect side, you 501 - > have the equipment for the solar panels, so we're filled into 502 - > that little envelope. In other cases, if we're dealing with 503 - > full EPCs that are owning the projects, that's when it's a 504 - > little bit easier, where you know we have the line of 505 - > communication with who we're working with are saying, hey, 506 - > based on all of the information that you've given us, you know, 507 - > here's what we think could happen, and this is again, like, 508 - > I can't stress enough that it really starts with the 509 - > foundations, the foundations of any project I've ever worked on, 510 - > whether it's carports, ground mounts, they are, you know, the 511 - > make or break of how the rest of your project is going to go, so 512 - > what we try to relate to the, to you know, our customer, who's 513 - > the next person in line, of whether they're selling it or 514 - > not, is that here's what we think we could come up against, 515 - > and how do you want to handle it?
Now, by that, I mean we have 516 - > some customers that go, we can't, no, we only can take a 517 - > full all in price, so they'll tell us, and they'll say, "You 518 - > need to just tell me you need to give me a price that you can get 519 - > this done, because I cannot go back to my customer and ask for 520 - > more money or do anything else. 521 - > So, in that case, it comes really difficult, where myself, 522 - > Matt, Kyle, we're all looking at the project and saying, okay, 523 - > here's what I think it looks like, here's what I think I 524 - > could be up against, here's what I'm predicting the problems to 525 - > be, and then I need to have enough of a contingency to be 526 - > able to do all this work, not lose money, and still tell the 527 - > customer that, hey, I gave you this price, and this is the 528 - > all-in price, and I can do it, and that's the way it's going to 529 - > be, and I've had jobs, a lot of our jobs recently, that's what 530 - > they are.
Where we, we went out, they said, "Just give me the 531 - > price, but don't, don't come back to me again, like you need 532 - > to give me a price to get it done. We went out, we thought we 533 - > were going to be able to drill foundations, we start drilling, 534 - > the holes start collapsing. We then have to get temporary 535 - > casings installed, it pushes you back a couple days, but we 536 - > didn't go back to the customer. 537 - > There wasn't any of being able to do that, and contrary to 538 - > that, we have customers that say, "Hey, you know, we are 539 - > value engineering this, where you know if there are problems, 540 - > we understand we don't want you to go and kill us on this, but 541 - > we want to do whatever needs to be done that's right, but.
542 - > You know, we'll share the, we'll share in the headache of a rough 543 - > foundation, and normally when we come across that, we vary from 544 - > our side, we're very transparent, we say no one 545 - > wanted to have this, but if it's rock drilling, or we need to 546 - > bring an auger, or we need to bring out hydro vac, which we've 547 - > used, you know, it's xyz price, 3000 for this, couple 1000 for 548 - > this, a lot of times we just show the cost and say, hey, it's 549 - > this plus our guys, and you know, we're trying to get 550 - > through this, so it being able to be on the same team, not only 551 - > with Kyle and Matt, but with whoever we're working with, is 552 - > really paramount, and it's managing expectations and 553 - > managing the expectations of what things we can be up 554 - > against, and how it's going to be financially covered, because 555 - > unfortunately I've learned this from the hard way, that as much 556 - > as you don't like having to have conversations about things 557 - > costing more money up front, it's really, really, really bad 558 - > to try to have them after you're already into it, and you know, 559 - > we've learned from that, and unfortunately, sometimes you 560 - > know, we've taken just losses on saying, hey, like, you know, 561 - > we're going to get this done, and we didn't see this coming, 562 - > but we want to get it done, and we want to have happy customers, 563 - > and happy partnerships, and long-lasting partnerships, then 564 - > you know, make a couple dollars on one job, 565 - > Tim Montague: if, if our industry could avoid one 566 - > problem.
What would the three of you identify as one problem to 567 - > avoid? Matt, Kyle, James. 568 - > James Strizki: The second, you know, part of this that's 569 - > probably not something that's talked about much, but is reason 570 - > that myself and our company does what we do, is that me, as an 571 - > engineer, myself, like I take pride in saying, if I don't like 572 - > giving answers on the fly, that if I don't know the answer on 573 - > the fly, I'm not going to give it to you, even if that's 574 - > something that you're not going to like.
I am going to say, hey, 575 - > you know, I have many, many people since I've been doing 576 - > this for, you know, I guess 2023 24 years, that I will talk to 577 - > the people that probably know more about that specific, 578 - > specific facet of whatever we're talking about, but, but the 579 - > point I'm getting at is that in some cases, you know, maybe 580 - > don't take on more than you think you should. By that, I 581 - > mean we've sold projects to people that believe they can 582 - > build these things, and we had customers initially when we were 583 - > first starting getting into carports, you know, probably 584 - > about 10 years ago or eight years ago, that we're like, 585 - > yeah, we can build it, we know how to build it, we, you know, 586 - > we feel very, very confident.
587 - > Said, okay, so you know, you sell the system, they go and 588 - > build it, you engineer it well. 589 - > When things are not built correctly, they don't 590 - > necessarily rear their ugly head right away. What ends up 591 - > happening is a year, a two years, maybe even a little bit 592 - > later. Usually, it's probably within a year.
That's when you 593 - > start seeing the problems, and some of the problems that we've 594 - > seen when holes aren't drilled correctly and casings are placed 595 - > and they don't have fill properly placed behind them, 596 - > that's when you get consolidation over time, later, 597 - > or even some undermining. So, I've seen undermined parking 598 - > lots where all of the fill under the parking lots kind of 599 - > collapsed. I've seen some issues where things were added after 600 - > the fact with electrical conduits that shouldn't have 601 - > been done, so it's, it's the experience that you're going to 602 - > get out of a out of a carport structure, and the longevity, 603 - > and you know, not having the issues is doing it right with 604 - > someone that knows how to do it, you know, and working with 605 - > people that know what they're doing versus trying to just go 606 - > do it the first time.
607 - > Tim Montague: Well, said Matt Kyle. 608 - > Matt Boyce: I think I could just a little piggyback a little bit 609 - > on what James said. So, my background before I traded in my 610 - > boots for a calculator was I have poured 100,000 yards of 611 - > concrete, we've done some pretty heavy construction, and you 612 - > know, if, if someone is new to this, then a lot of new people 613 - > would have a tendency to be a little bit lower on every single 614 - > step than they should be, and for instance, like if you, if 615 - > someone tells you that you need eight people out there on the 616 - > site, then they send out six, and if someone says that you 617 - > need a large material handler, then somebody will send out a 618 - > backhoe, or you know, if you need, like, a carpenter or a 619 - > group of carpenters, a crew, or mill rights to set your anchor 620 - > bolt cages so that they don't move when you're pouring, or you 621 - > know, you have the right crane or material handler to set the 622 - > columns and make sure everything's plugged.
Com, and 623 - > you know it's just what we think we could do it with this, we 624 - > think we could do it with this, and this isn't like, you know, 625 - > when the economy is booming, everybody thinks that they can 626 - > be a building inspector, that it's this is this is heavy 627 - > construction, and and it has to be done right, because 628 - > everything everything piles on afterwards, so you can't, you 629 - > can't do this halfway. It has to be done right. And from where I 630 - > grew up, a lot of people might have an issue with this, but 631 - > from where I grew up, that meant you get a union foundation 632 - > contractor or union iron workers or union electricians, because 633 - > in the area that I grew up in, St.
Louis, Missouri, unions were 634 - > highly reputable, and they did amazing, impeccable work. Okay, 635 - > that may not be the case everywhere. Okay, and it may not 636 - > be the case today, but back then, but that's the level of 637 - > quality that needs to happen with this, because when you get 638 - > to the end of it, you know, at the end of all the heavy 639 - > construction, you have to put solar panels to create a roof 640 - > for this, and they have to fit, and you can't be jockeying them 641 - > around, and you can't, everything has to fit, so 642 - > everything has to go off of, so you, you can't go out thinking, 643 - > oh, I can do this, and the other thing is, is that if you're a 644 - > purchaser of construction, either a developer, EPC, just a 645 - > property owner, or whatever, if you're a purchaser of this 646 - > construction, you have to be able to say I don't know.
You 647 - > have to know when you don't know something, and then rely on the 648 - > experts, the people in this room, to be able to walk you 649 - > through it, because you trusted them enough to call them ahead 650 - > of time. You got to trust them with the answers, they're not 651 - > going to lead you astray. We're all going to make our money. No, 652 - > we're not.
Nobody's going to hit a home run off of your job, so 653 - > you know we're all here because at the end of the day, Kyle 654 - > wants to take a picture of your installation, add it to his 655 - > wall, saying we did that, and everybody wants to walk away 656 - > from a job that they can be proud of, so the purchaser of 657 - > construction, just because you built a house or flipped a house 658 - > or whatever, does not necessarily mean that you're 659 - > ready to do this, so doesn't mean you can't, it means rely on 660 - > the people that do know.
661 - > Tim Montague: Sure, 662 - > Kyle Sinclair: I did want to answer your question, just 663 - > because it's real fast. On you know, if I could eliminate a 664 - > mistake from the industry, my answer was ground mount 665 - > trackers, so I wish we could just get rid of them as a joke. 666 - > Obviously, I'm biased towards fixed tilt, but you know one 667 - > thing that I think there is a big gap in the industry is 668 - > having long term maintenance clearly outlined, you know, no 669 - > matter what your system is, if it's fixed tilt ground mount, 670 - > fixed tilt carports, you know, or or tracking system, so make 671 - > sure that those long term maintenance is clearly outlined 672 - > in that you have a plan on that for the future.
673 - > Tim Montague: All right. Well, I'm going to start with a 674 - > question from Peter. What about existing structures here in the 675 - > southwest Tucson area? There are already so many carports 676 - > existing for shade, it seems like they would be ideal for 677 - > installations.
Can you repurpose an existing carport for a solar 678 - > carport, 679 - > Matt Boyce: potentially you can, you know, depending on what the 680 - > original use of that structure was. If it was just a shade 681 - > structure, then traditionally those are either designed to the 682 - > lowest possible standard in the building code or none at all, so 683 - > you do have to do a due diligence, because anytime you 684 - > walk up to an existing structure, there's always the 685 - > thought, especially in my mind, did they even get a permit for 686 - > this, because there are some structures that you see the 687 - > answer is obviously yes, and some is no, they absolutely did 688 - > not.
So the other thing is, is that we're changing the use of 689 - > that structure now, and most importantly, out of anybody in 690 - > this room, I have to put my stamp on it, so it better be 691 - > right, because I will not put my stamp on it if it's not, so we 692 - > won't, we won't compromise on any of that, because if I seal 693 - > something, that means I say that it's safe, and it's safe 694 - > forever, and I will not take liability for a structure that. 695 - > Someone built that that I don't necessarily trust.
Now that 696 - > being said, if it does look good, and we could do a little 697 - > bit of testing, like find out what the depth of the foundation 698 - > is, and whatever else, you know, we would definitely be open to 699 - > doing that, so we wouldn't rule that out just by rote, because 700 - > you know we didn't design the structure, so chances are 701 - > though, and if a structure is not specifically designed for 702 - > this, it's probably not going to be good enough for this.
703 - > Tim Montague: Do you guys see a big difference in different 704 - > regions of the country, like the Northeast or the Southeast or 705 - > the Midwest or the Southwest, in terms of the amount or the 706 - > importance of geotech. 707 - > Matt Boyce: Again, that one's me. I won't do a project without 708 - > a geotech. 709 - > James Strizki: I'll chime in on that too, Matt.
Like the geotech 710 - > is going to give you the initial kind of background of what 711 - > you're looking at, of what you're seeing now. I would say 712 - > out of many, many times it could say it's clay soil that is 713 - > supposed to be cohesive, and many times I've gone there and 714 - > it is not so. As far as the geotech goes, from the 715 - > engineering standpoint, yes, 100% can be needed from the 716 - > construction standpoint of what are you going to run into when 717 - > you build it.
It's very, very difficult, difficult in kind of 718 - > knowing what you're going to be up against. A lot of times what 719 - > I rely on is once I know where the project is, and you know, 720 - > for all over the country, I will call, I will do all my due 721 - > diligence. Again, I really stress the three items, I'll go 722 - > on web soil GIS software. I will type in geotech for the for the 723 - > area, and just look through any geotechs I can find.
I'll look 724 - > for, I'll go on Google Maps and take a look at the street view 725 - > and see if I see outcroppings or see if I see any areas where 726 - > there's construction, and they're going, you know, even 727 - > just driving around, like, you know, going through Google Maps, 728 - > you can see if there's a site that's being built, and you can 729 - > kind of see what the soil looks like when they dig it. Then, 730 - > after that, as the project kind of evolves or gets closer to 731 - > actually starting, I will call numerous drilling companies that 732 - > are in the area.
They are obviously usually worth a wealth 733 - > of knowledge, like that. They're the easiest ones to go to, but 734 - > with that said, when I call them, you know, I usually make 735 - > sure I'm calling them when I have a real project, like no one 736 - > wants to just have their time wasted, so they're the ones that 737 - > will tell you, "Hey, I've drilled in this area, here's 738 - > what we're looking to go up against, and that's where you 739 - > really can make sure you know what you think you're going to 740 - > have to be prepared with, like type three casings, you're going 741 - > to hit rock, you know, whatever the cases are, and they're 742 - > really the best people to kind of reach out to and know what, 743 - > what they think they're going to expect, and they could even give 744 - > you some preliminary numbers, just saying, hey, we've drilled 745 - > holes in that area, you know, you could probably get this far 746 - > down in about this many time, expect this many holes per day, 747 - > Kyle Sinclair: yeah, in Tim, you know, 90% of the time it's not a 748 - > new geotech, right?
The infrastructure is already there, 749 - > you know, the building likely has a geotech report from when 750 - > the structure was built within the last, you know, 20 or 30 751 - > year window, so we're able to utilize that specific data for 752 - > these jobs. The other thing is, is a lot of the jobs that we 753 - > partner on are municipal projects that have some type of 754 - > state grant funding tied to it, and they require geotech 755 - > analysis on all of those jobs.
756 - > Tim Montague: You know, I'm left with a big question mark about 757 - > contingency when you're pricing a project, and I wonder if, if 758 - > you guys could break down the big buckets for how, how to 759 - > budget properly for a project. 760 - > Obviously, dialog with companies like Sinclair and Gen Mounts is 761 - > critical on the front end, and I think that has come through loud 762 - > and clear, but can you speak to how to think about approaching 763 - > pricing, and do, and just speak in rules of thumb, you know, one 764 - > of my rules of thumb is you can expect to spend 2x on a price 765 - > per watt, or 3x sometimes on a price per watt on a carport, and 766 - > that's the number one deal killer.
Everyone wants a carport 767 - > in their parking lot, but when it comes to affordability, if 768 - > you can do rooftop solar, that's going to be much more 769 - > affordable. But how do you guys see this? 770 - > Kyle Sinclair: I can talk a little bit about the steel side, 771 - > you know, I'll let kind of, I think James will have better 772 - > visibility into total project costing, but we've been pretty 773 - > good on the steel side with trying to lock in a fixed rate 774 - > for those customers, you know, with material deposit money, 775 - > knowing that, hey, this could, this could be a year.
Or before 776 - > they get a permit approval and building approval, and they're 777 - > already dialed in, so we normally have, if your project 778 - > is less than two megawatts, we likely have the raw materials 779 - > already in stock or in the pipeline, so we're very 780 - > comfortable with, hey, let's let's focus on fixing your cost 781 - > on the structural components, and then they can pivot to 782 - > working with Matt and James on adding buffer and analyzing the 783 - > costs based on the foundation requirements.
Hey 784 - > Tim Montague: guys, are you a residential solar installer 785 - > doing light commercial, but wanting to scale into large CNI 786 - > solar. I'm Tim Montague. I've developed over 150 megawatts of 787 - > commercial solar, and I've solved the problem that you're 788 - > having. You don't know what tools and technologies you need 789 - > in order to successfully close 100 kw to megawatt scale 790 - > projects.
I've developed a commercial solar accelerator to 791 - > help installers exactly like you. Just go to Clean Power 792 - > hour.com click on strategy, and book a call today. It's totally 793 - > free with no obligation.
Thanks for being a listener. I really 794 - > appreciate you listening to the pod. And I'm Tim Montague. Let's 795 - > grow solar and storage.
Go to Clean Power Hour and click 796 - > strategy today. Thanks so much. 797 - > Well, unfortunately, we're out of time, and this was a really 798 - > great conversation. I want to thank the panelists, Kyle, 799 - > James, and Matt, for making time for us today.
Tell a friend 800 - > about the show. Check all of our content out at Clean Power 801 - > hour.com And I would love it if our panelists would just let our 802 - > audience know how they can best reach you. 803 - > Kyle Sinclair: Yeah, we're getting busy this summer, but 804 - > shoot me an email, that's the best way to contact me, it's 805 - > Kyle at Sinclair designs.
net 806 - > Matt Boyce: Although I would like my answer to be, you could 807 - > reach me by emailing Kyle at Kyle Sinclair, but you can reach 808 - > me at Matt Boyce, M A T T B O Y C e3 nine@gmail.com I I will 809 - > caution you that I, this is a, this is a team, and I don't have 810 - > a tremendous amount of capacity outside of this team for any new 811 - > work because of all of my client commitments. So, you can still, 812 - > you can still email me if you got a really great job, I might 813 - > be interested in looking at it.
814 - > Tim Montague: And James Triskey, 815 - > James Strizki: for me you can reach me at James J A M E S at 816 - > Genmounts, G E N M O U N Ts.com You can also look at 817 - > www.genmounts.com or www.
rehsolar.com one the rh 818 - > already. Solar has been mostly what we've been doing with the 819 - > actual construction side of things. The other side is 820 - > racking.
If you guys need solar racking help, we can help you 821 - > out with that. 822 - > Tim Montague: And with that, I want to say, thank you for 823 - > joining us, everyone. It's been great to have you for Carport 824 - > Solar Done Right. I'm Tim Montague.
Let's grow solar and 825 - > storage. Take care, everyone. 826 - > The Clean Power Hour is brought to you by CPS America, maker of 827 - > North America's number one three-phase string inverter, 828 - > with over 10 gigawatts shipped in the US. The CPS product 829 - > lineup includes string inverters ranging from 25 kw to 350 kw.
830 - > Their flagship inverter, the CPS 350 kw, is designed to work with 831 - > solar plants ranging from two megawatts to two gigawatts. CPS 832 - > is the world's most bankable inverter brand and is America's 833 - > number one choice for solar plants. Now offering solutions 834 - > for commercial utility, ESS, and balance of system requirements. 835 - > Go to Chint Power systems.
com or call 855-584-7168 to find out 836 - > more.
Other episodes covering the same guests and topics, from across The B2B Podcast Index.