Freight Tech That Solves Real Carrier Problems with Don Everhart
Behind The Freight · 2026-06-16 · 28 min
Substance score
42 / 100
Five dimensions, 20 points each
Don Everhart, Head of Partnerships and Strategy at Transflow, discusses how freight technology should solve real operational problems rather than chase hype, drawing from his 25-year career spanning Swift Transportation, Freightvana, and now Transflow. He emphasizes that successful tech adoption requires understanding carrier and broker pain points, removing tedious work through automation, and maintaining human relationships at the core of broker-carrier interactions. The conversation covers AI applications for small fleets, autonomous vehicle adoption timelines, and the evolution of back-office automation toward exception management and agentic resolution.
Key takeaways
- Tech adoption in trucking should prioritize removing friction and solving specific problems rather than pursuing the latest shiny innovations or overpromised solutions.
- Back-office automation's highest value comes from exception management - reducing the volume of items requiring human review from 70-80% down to 3-10% so workers do meaningful work instead of moving papers around.
- Small fleet carriers can gain immediate advantage by automating load acquisition and broker negotiation through AI, since owner-operators only make money when wheels are rolling and don't have time for manual coordination.
- Autonomous vehicle adoption will be driven by regulation rather than technical capability, with states like Texas and Arizona leading expansion, while liability and sensor data will reshape how fault is determined in incidents.
- Brokers and carriers should seek out technology partners with clear, defensible moats beyond just using off-the-shelf LLMs - like proprietary data or years of historical information - to ensure they're getting real competitive advantage.
Guests
What our scoring noted
Our reviewer’s read on each dimension, with quotes from the episode.
Insight Density
A handful of actionable ideas surface - AI stack interrogation as a vendor vetting heuristic, exception management reduction targets, load-acquisition automation for small fleets - but these are diluted by lengthy nostalgia, studio compliments, personal anecdotes, and a filler lightning round that consumes a significant share of the 28 minutes.
why are you touching and invoicing so many pieces of paper? Like, why is your process like filling out a Word document and printing it off, scanning it in and sending it off to someone?
I can go sign up for all of those things while we're sitting here and we can wire them up in an afternoon. What's your moat?
Originality
The 'what's your AI stack?' vendor challenge is a genuinely useful heuristic, and the data-moat framing adds some nuance, but most takes - regulatory barriers to autonomy, relationships over automation, reallocation not replacement - are widely circulated industry consensus. Don explicitly refuses to name overhyped tech, dodging the most original territory available.
we're living in exponential times, but it looks linear because we're on such a short time horizon
what's truly proprietary about your stack? You don't have the history, so you don't have the data moat. So what's your moat?
Guest Caliber
Don Everhart has genuine multi-decade practitioner credentials - CS background, 15 years at Swift across 15 roles, startup experience, now strategy at Transflow - and is credibly an operator-turned-technologist rather than a career podcast guest. However, the transcript reveals him being guarded on direct questions and relatively vague on Transflow's specifics.
I love that you've been in the business, that you've built a business, that you've gone the startup path
I've been overpromised before
Specificity & Evidence
There are scattered concrete references - Aurora trucks, the Chandler-to-Tucson autonomous lane, the 70-80% to 3% exception management target, and 150 broker calls for owner-ops - but no revenue figures, customer counts, implementation timelines, or case study data. Much of the evidence is anecdotal or name-dropped without supporting metrics.
there's autonomous trucks running between here and Tucson
I've sat in the Aurora trucks like phenomenal product
Conversational Craft
The host lands a few pointed scenario-based questions (the five-truck fleet prompt yielded a useful answer), but repeatedly allows Don to dodge - most notably on the overhyped-tech question where a 'hard pass' goes unchallenged. Personal nostalgia and the pointless animal-driver lightning round eat several minutes that could have been sharp follow-up.
So hypothetically, cause I know you've been part of a startup and we're, we're helping as a managing partner. If you were to start a small, let's just say a five fleet trucking company today, where is one place that immediately you would say
You're going to get me in trouble. Yeah, that's the point, Don. I don't know. I think pass.
Conversation analysis
Computed from the transcript - who did the talking, and the verbal tics along the way.
Share of words spoken
- Speaker A63%
- Speaker B23%
- Speaker C14%
Filler words
Episode notes
Don Everhart has spent his years working with both trucking and technology. He grew up in a trucking family and worked through many roles at Swift Transportation before moving into the tech side of the industry. In this episode, Don joins Todd and John at the Fullbay headquarters in Phoenix to discuss how technology is moving from "shiny" hype to solving actual problems. The conversation covers the uses of AI for carriers of all sizes. For small fleets, Don suggests focusing on load acquisition and using AI to manage the heavy volume of calls and negotiations. For larger carriers, the focus would ideally be back-office automation and removing manual invoicing. Don also gives a reality check on autonomous trucking. He explains that while the technology is advancing quickly, the path forward depends on regulations and liability and not everything can be automated. This is a major theme that comes up is the human element in a high-tech world. Don argues for reallocating resources so that people can focus on relationships rather than tedious paperwork. He emphasizes that the goal of software should be to make the industry more personal.
Full transcript
28 minTranscribed and scored by The B2B Podcast Index.
On the broker and carrier side, I think relationship is key. I think we all believe that, and it's an easy thing to say. It's a very difficult thing to execute on. So if you're going to remove the tedious work, spend that work with human time. Hello and welcome to this episode of behind the Freight. We are here at Full Bay's headquarters in Phoenix, Arizona. In person on today's episodes, we're joined by Mr. Don Everhart, Head of Partnerships and Strategy at Transflow. Don has spent more than two decades in transportation and logistics with leadership roles spanning operations, pricing, analytics, technology, and freight innovations at companies like Swift Transportation, Freightvana and now transflow. He's built a career at the intersection of trucking and technology, helping carriers modernize operations, improve workflows, and adapt tools that actually solve real world problems. Today we're going to talk about freight tech for carriers. What's useful, what's hype, where are the biggest opportunities today and how carriers can use technology to become more profitable and efficient. Welcome, Don. Thanks so much. You should just walk around with me sometimes, just introing me. I love it when other people talk about me. Yes, I'll do that the whole conference. I'm going to be your intro man. Yeah. Before we kick off, can we just, like, acknowledge the studio that we're in? We're here at the Full Bay headquarters and they have an amazing studio and very appreciative that they're letting us use that today. Couldn't agree more. I feel like a celebrity now being in this place. I've not been in such an advanced studio. Yeah. Cool. So funny story about Don. You mentioned he's been in the logistics world for a couple decades, I would say going on 25 now. I actually started around the same time as Don in this industry back in the Swift Transportation days, and I always knew that you were destined for something special. Back in our day, we were planners and logistics coordinators essentially for Swift. And that was the green screens with the AS400. Oh, yeah. Don figured out ways to get in, I would say the backside of the AS 400 system and manipulate things so that we could mess with internal employees and they wouldn't know who was doing it. It was the best. So, yeah, the fact that you could figure out how to get into as 400 and do manipulations, I knew that you're going to be something awesome. I appreciate that. And John, you're right. We go back a long way. Right. I think I was working as an extended coverage driver manager at the time. You Guys were the daytime planners, so we did a lot of handoffs and I studied computer science in college. Right. But I've got deep trucking roots and found myself starting my career at Averitt. Right. And as I spent some time there, you know, it was just like, oh, hey, this is solving problems, this is solutioning. I like this work. So I kind of set out to find the biggest company I could go to where I could have the most opportunity. So when I hopped over and joined you guys, it was a lot of fun and really got to lean in on a lot of interesting things. Touched a lot throughout my career and appreciate every minute that I've had in this industry. Yeah, you mentioned it pre going live, but you had over 13 different roles at Swift. So they would bounce him around where they had a need or. Or there was a gap. They would say, oh, Don can do it, and they'll just throw him in the seat. So he was wearing a lot of different hats. It was really cool getting to experience your journey at Swift and be part of it. For man, I was there for almost 10 years, so, yeah, I did 15 total years there. It's not a sentence for those listening today, you know, I wouldn't trade that experience for anything. Got to touch a lot of different areas. With all that background and now with like this focus on technology, do you feel like that gives you a different lens to that you view the industry through or view your role through than people who might have come straight into the tech side or the freight tech side? How do you think that's shaped your view on things? Yeah, I mean, that's a really good question, Todd. And I think I have a unique view just in general. My grandfather was a driver. I don't know that you guys knew that. I remember this moment right there in Tennessee, right? Yeah, in Tennessee. So I grew up in a trucking family, just in general. So I knew some of the challenges that truckers faced and, and then having that technology lens and recognizing the challenges that we were going to face. I think some of it was forward looking. Right. It's because there's the adoption curve. You can't just go in and go, hey, I'm fully automating your job. Congratulations. Like, work done. Right. So being that bridge kind of helped pull people along to see the bigger picture, to make the connections. It's certainly helpful and I view it as a superpower. In a lot of cases, you feel like people trust you more too, because you've seen their roles or been in their roles or they Believe what you're saying rather than just some tech guy coming in that hasn't lived it. Yeah, absolutely. It's funny you say that because even internally at Transflow, one thing that Bill or Renee would say to me is like, I love that you've lived on both sides. Right. I love that you've been in the business, that you've built a business, that you've gone the startup path. And then you also have this technical mind that helps kind of see it and pull it together. But yes, it does build trust a lot faster when you can walk into a brokerage and not show up as a sales guy and say, hey, I've solved this problem before and I know the 15 reasons why it sucks to go through this and I can tell you exactly where we can help solve something and where we can't. So it's more about being able to say what you can't do in a lot of cases than it is even what you go in and promise. And people know that I won't over promise them because I've been overpromised before. 100%. Yeah. Shoot. Back in our swift days, we thought Swift was so innovative in what they were doing with their systems and yet they were only a few years past. The T cards, where you actually get a punch, they give you coins, where your check call was actually going to the truck stop, making a phone call, checking in, saying how far out you were. I remember systems going down, we broke out the green sheets bar by bar. We're calling drivers. Right, exactly. Right. Me too. I was there. Absolutely. So the evolution from that, what you've seen from all of that friction filled process for something as simple as tendering a load to a carrier, to what you're doing now at Transflow. What a crazy roller coaster you've been on. Yeah, yeah. And speaking to the transfer story, I think that's kind of an interesting story in itself is you've got a company that's been around for 30 years, right. So I walk in and I'm like, hey, we've got all these partners, we've got all this tech guys. It took me probably six months to understand all the products we had that's touching the industry. Whether it's the trip pack system. Right. Which still exists, the kiosks still exist, ELD offerings, all of the in cab solutions that we have. But kind of our growth engine has really been that automation and back office. Right. And that's back office for not only brokers, but it's for carriers. It's for factors we're touching transactions and we're doing it at a scale that you know, and I know this is offensive to some people, but ask scale that no one else in the industry is doing. Right. So it's fun. And then you get in some of our newer offerings like our LTL offering and that's where we're really starting to run. Yeah, I mean like stepping into an organization that's been so prevalent for so many years and to be able to have an impact and to help bring that to the industry is pretty cool to watch. Yeah, I've been following you for some time. I mean we met probably four or five years ago and I've just loved whether it's your LinkedIn content or just hearing your name and stories, I think it's been pretty exciting. As you shifted into the tech side, what's some of the major lessons or what would you say are some of the major lessons from working at a night swift or you know, working at the organizations you have? What are some of the major lessons that you've learned? This kind of stand out as we hear it behind the freight like to talk about is like the journey to today and what brought you to where you are today. What are some of those pivotal moments that kind of stand out for you? Yeah, that's a great question because I think it's kind of the core of how I see the world now. Right. When I look at tech, I used to be like the guy that got excited about everything. It's like, oh my God, we're going to change the world. This is shiny. Let's go. Right. And what I realized is, as I have been in my career longer is sometimes it's not necessarily the shiny thing. Right. It's the one that removes friction. It's the one that's outcome driven. It's the stuff where tech also moves so fast. And I think that's one of the areas where I'm very fortunate is I get to slow down and look at the fast moving tech, become a semi expert in it. You know, I would never classify myself as like purely knowing everything, although I may come off that way sometimes. But as I look at something, I go, all right, well this is the edge, so we can live on the edge. But then here's current state. What's a reasonable stepwise movement? Right. I mean we're seeing that with you guys at Truck Stop, right. I mean you've had all of this innovation over time and I know Scott is moving an incredible clip right now. I know because I get the texts from him like, hey, how do we do some stuff? Right? And as we look at that, you're not, hey, how do I deploy more AI and call this thing AI? It's more, how can I improve the outcome for the driver? The driver is center to everything and that's one of our core attendants, is what problem are we solving? Right. So it's an interesting space to be in right now, primarily because I believe that we're in an area of. And I'm going to butcher a quote from someone. I don't know if it was Jensen or Elon or who, but like we're living in exponential times, but it looks linear because we're on such a short time horizon. So as we've kind of shortened up, it's like, I don't know what tomorrow holds in a lot of cases. Right. I don't think any of us do. I do know that adoption's moving a lot faster. I think you guys are saying that as well with what I've heard from some growth stories there. But we're seeing people like lean in on solutions and solutions are solving real problems. Yeah, for sure. I know you've been dabbling within AI for quite some time, which is awesome, by the way. Question for you. What is one area where carriers should or could be using some AI or some automation, in your opinion, to help mitigate and or maybe eliminate some of that friction that you mentioned? So it depends on the size of carrier, right? Because different size carriers are going to have different problems. There's some players out there that are doing some things for the owner. Op around, hey, how do I post my truck and handle the 150 phone calls and make sure I'm getting the premium rate without answering 150 phone calls? Right. So we're seeing that. So how do I call negotiate with a bunch of brokers when I really don't have time to? Because I'm only making money when the wheels are rolling. Right. As you get into the midsize care, I think that's one of the areas midsize enterprise, that's where we and others are starting to show up and go, why are you touching and invoicing so many pieces of paper? Like, why is your process like filling out a Word document and printing it off, scanning it in and sending it off to someone? Those are areas where I think they have probably the most impact. Outside of that, your larger carriers are finding things around optimization on routes because we can just evaluate more at this point in time. Right. The times of like, hey, we're going to let Manhattan run another cycle. No offense, Manhattan, because they're also working on things. But at the time it was like, hey, we'll wait till Micromap runs its next resequencing based on all of our planning here, you know, two hours later. Because that's the sequence we had set up on. It's like, no, now there were these hundred new loads that were booked and these 50 that got covered. What's my now optimum network to roll with? Right. And you see a lot of people playing in that space and doing a really good job. So hypothetically, cause I know you've been part of a startup and we're, we're helping as a managing partner. If you were to start a small, let's just say a five fleet trucking company today, where is one place that immediately you would say, hey, we need to automate this piece of the workflow. If you were running a small fleet, probably primarily around my load acquisition strategy. So how I'm interacting with load boards, how I'm interacting with brokers, trying to get as much as I can into my hands and my decisioning. But to do that I have to have the hands. So in lieu of people, I would be leaning in on AI pretty heavily in that space. I got to jump into the future and I want to find out how far into the future and talk a little bit about autonomous. So we're here in Phoenix and I love riding in the Waymos here in Phoenix. So I rode one here. Last time I was here, I left my cell phone in the Waymo which makes it incredibly challenging to get your cell phone back because you need your cell phone to connect to the Waymo One story. True story. I was on Spring Breakdown in Texas with my kids last week and returned my rental car the night before. I was going to fly out and got an Uber to pick me up from the rent a car facility. The driver drove into the rental car area and then could not find a way to exit and drove over the spikes to exit. I was looking at my cell phone and all of a sudden I hear the sound. I'm like, oh man, all four tires flat. And I share those stories because I think there's pros and cons to both sides of this, right? But as we look at trucking, I've always been a long term, long side autonomous in trucking, but I'm starting to hear and see more of that exponential advancement. Where do you think we are on that and where autonom autonomous will really have a meaningful impact in the industry and also what's needed to prepare the path for that from an industry perspective. I'd just love to get your take on how you see things from your purview. Yeah, it's a lot. Yeah. So it's interesting because one, when we look at autonomous, the incidence per million miles is an order of magnitude lower than a human. So in a lot of cases, and I say this from a place of privilege, right. I trust the robot more than I trust a lot of humans on the road. Now I also haven't been rear ended or hit by an autonomous vehicle yet. Yet. Yet. That might be the end of my story. That's how we wrap folks. So as far as like adoption and where we go, we are seeing a lot of acceleration from the largest AI companies and compute companies. Right. So a lot of this is going to be driven by edge driven AI. Right. And the acceleration there is astounding. I can do stuff on a personal PC that, you know, a nice PC, but that would have taken, you know, a rack in a data center some years ago. So as we see that acceleration, I think we're going to see better models, better decisioning, better inputs from sensors, smaller sensors, which means more sensors. The problem that we'll see with autonomous, and I would love for any of the autonomous guys out there to just call me up and tell me I'm completely wrong on this and that they're going to take over the US widely. It's going to be regulatory. It's 100% going to be regulatory. Like three years ago, you know, we've got, I think it was the Frito Lay in Chandler, or maybe it was Pepsi and Chandler. Not sure who it was. But there's autonomous trucks running between here and Tucson. They're just up and down the road. Right. I've sat in the Aurora trucks like phenomenal product and we're seeing more adoption. So, you know, Texas is pretty friendly, Arizona's pretty friendly, California's friendly. Ish. Right. I think as we see expansion in regulation in some of those heavier freight lanes, we'll actually see an explosion, the good kind of explosion. I've been curious about the litigation side of things and the liability side of things because now you're taking in an industry where liability is already moving upstream or has been upstream and trying to get to the bigger and bigger pockets. You take out the driver as one could be looked at as a scapegoat in a lot of scenarios and situations. But that's where I'm interested To see how this shaked out is, yes, they're going to have a lot less accidents, but when they do have an accident, where's that liability lie? With the tech company or the person who decided to put the tech in charge of driving the equipment? And how's that going to shake out from a legal standpoint is going to be interesting. That's a Matt Leffler question all day long right there. I do think it's interesting because there's a lot involved in AI in general. Like a lot of people are just thinking in terms of like LLMs or, or even small language models. And I use language model loosely. Right. Because we have reasoning and decisioning that's out there, but it's really about the entire AI harness. Right. So if I have an AI harness that's consuming information, is making decisions, but I have tooling tied to that. Is the tooling responsible? Did we have latency on the tooling? Was it a model problem? The model's largely black box for us at that point. I think you're hitting on one of the things. Right. And I don't know that any of us know the answer. Are you going to go after a frontier model company? Probably because they've got all the money and quite frankly lawsuits follow the money. We all know that from having working carriers. Doesn't matter if it was the brokered truck, if it was two truck fleet, whoever's got the money, they go out there. Yeah, we know that from our swift days. They showed up calling for sure. But I feel like in the same vein, these autonomous trucks will likely have obviously like a lot more camera sensors. It's going to be easy to determine who's at fault very quickly as well. Do you feel like with the advancements of the autonomous world and autonomous trucks that maybe there's going to be less litigation and things happening from a legal perspective because of all of the advancements in what the sensors or more. Because you have more information. Right. So unfortunately I grew up in a time where as a broker it was like the less you know, the better in some cases. Right. And that's no reflection on the brokers I work for. But that was just industry. Right. There's a reason they have a carrier broker agreement. There is an inward facing cameras is a perfect example of there's pros and cons, but it potentially gives more information in adds liability when it's not even the necessary cause of fault. Yeah. Now all that clears you very quickly in a lot of cases. But I do worry about how much Data ultimately comes together on the autonomous side. Now, if you're a driver out there that wants to defend actions, because now we can actually see the action, I think that's a different story. And by the way, you can call me at Translo. We'll take care of all of your camera and ELD needs. Shameless plug. You can work as though you are autonomous, but not with a real. So I feel like there's a lot that's overhyped in the industry and has been overhyped, but what do you look at that's overhyped right now when it comes to trucking technology? Oof. You're going to get me in trouble. Yeah, that's the point, Don. I don't know. I think pass. He says, yeah, hard pass. I think it comes down to what your actual moat is, right? As some of the providers in the space, and I have the pleasure of working with like several, and I'm partnered with several different players in the space, are doing different things with AI. Right. We're primarily an AI company when it comes to our workflow and some of our stuff. So we also have years and years and years of data, but others don't have that allows us to make different decisions. Just like Truck Stop. Which is why you guys are a great partner for us as well. Like, we get to do some very interesting things. I think when I talk to or advise with a newer AI entrant, one of the first things I ask is I go, what's your stack? Just walk me through your AI stack. You know, it's the simplest question to ask someone and I encourage anyone to do it. And one, if they're hesitant or, oh, it's a proprietary model. Okay. Like proprietary models, you can do fine tuning on them. That's great. But what's truly proprietary about your stack? You don't have the history, so you don't have the data moat. So what's your moat? And someone should be able to answer that. And a lot of times what I'll hear is, we're using, and I won't name the platforms because that's just rude, but we're using this platform for our voice, we're using this LLM for our guidance, we're using this LLM for our reasoning. Here's how we're doing our communications. It's like, I can go sign up for all of those things while we're sitting here and we can wire them up in an afternoon. What's your moat? Right? So I think that's one of the Areas where I'm skeptical is again it has to be outcome based and has to solve a problem. So it's cool that you can do certain things but what problems are you solving? Maybe one more question and then we'll get in the lightning round. We got lightning rounds. Oh yeah. Oh that's my favorite. Okay. I love it. So ask kind of a two part question. One is around what does really that next generation look like for just back office operations for carriers? And then two, with that being said, how can brokers better work with carriers to leverage and utilize that back office work? Yeah. So when we think about the back office, it has been a not so glamorous job for a long time. Right. So it's tedious. It's looking at paper, it's comparing to other information. I would even say not next gen but current gen is why are we looking at everything right? Like we have the information, we can get the extract at high, high extract quality, we can compare it to the information and we can do it across a lot more than like one or two fields. Right. So if we can look at all of it and evaluate and flag like true exception management is kind of where it's at. And then so that's current state and if you're asking about next state or next gen it's more around what's that agentic resolution look like. So if I'm going to have a person look at something from an exception perspective, is it very difficult work? Do I have to go do a bunch of different stuff or is it really just I need eyes on it and I need a knowledge base? I'm comparing that against. It's still difficult work but it's not the most difficult. I think you saw that, saw in notes that you saw that about kind of our LTL platform. It's like or something I post on LinkedIn. It's hey, it's one thing to take it down to. Now you've got, you know, 10% of stuff that you need to look at instead of 70 or 80%. What if we cut that further to 3%? Now you're doing meaningful work. Right. And you're not just moving things around. So that's one of the areas that we're seeing a pretty big lift. And then beyond that I think a challenge that we have because I love presenting solutions but a challenge that we have as an industry is then we believe pretty heavily in reallocation of resources, not replacement of resources. So what upskilling are we doing? Like what other value are you going to Seek in your organization. How should you redeploy those resources to better work, you know, and on the broker and carrier side, I think relationship is key. Right. I think we all believe that and it's an easy thing to say. It's a very difficult thing to execute on. So if you're going to remove the tedious work, spend that work with human time. Let's let software be software. Let's let agents be agents and agentic happen. Let's not depersonalize it to a point that you've already got a driver that's locked on the road and most of his interaction, his or her interaction for the day is staring at the next sign that's upcoming and being away from their families. Let's make it more personal. Let's make it more personal for the driver. Yeah, that's something I've been talking a lot about is the incredible importance to evolve the way that we handle relationships with the evolution of AI. The other thing is when I was running a brokerage and running an asset based company, I think it was so easy to look at the new next shiny object and thing and it was hard to make decisions over what technology to utilize and there's so many different options. But at the end of the day, technology was not going to replace or have success without a solid process and solid people. And so it's like you can't expect if your process is broken or you don't have the right people for this to be successful or all of a sudden be the magic bullet and like you have to have that foundation first. And the other thing I saw is, is involving the people rather than forcing it down. I saw a lot more buy in when we'd involved the team and get them engaged and the excitement would come from that involvement. Some of our biggest advocates are the end user, like hey, would you much rather spend your time like focused on the stuff that actually gets something done? And to that end, I think AI actually drives us to a place where we are a more personal society. Not as cold as I think some folks are struggling with the adoption. I think that's end state. Do you say please and thank you to your AI? I do, but just because I want to waste tokens, you probably don't do. You're a sales guy and I go fast and if they don't give me the answer, I want to yell at it. Yeah, that sounds about right. Yeah. Lightning round. This is my favorite. All right. Hopefully you didn't cheat. And look at. I'm not looking good. I Refuse to be prepared. John, I love it. Love it. That's going to make these better than okay. If animals were to jump in the driver's seat of a big 18 wheeler and drive a truck down the road, what animal do you feel would be the best driver and why? Oh, now you wish you were to prepare. I'm going to give you two answers. I know I only really get one. Hyena. Like they're running miles, man. Right. Like let's get it done. Look at that. Now from a safety perspective, maybe. Maybe an elephant. Like we're never going to forget anything. Like we have our information but from a getting it done and getting down the road. Let's go. Getting that paycheck. There you go. I love it. All day long. Finish the sentence. The freight industry will be meaningfully better when. When we drive. Respect for our drivers throughout the industry and the job that they have. Yep. Well said. And then last one. What is one metric number or one thing that a carrier should focus on weekly? Their health and them personally. Right. Like it doesn't matter how many miles you drive. And John, I'll hit on something that we used to say at Swift right now that matters. We don't make it back. Our most important stop. Damn deep dude. I love that. And he lied. It wasn't the last one. Who's someone in the trucking industry doing great work that people should follow or learn from. Follow or learn from. I'm really impressed with the team over at my mechanic. Right. So Alex Bazubitz over there, CEO, sharp guy. Really shaking things up. I think he's one to watch for sure. That's awesome. Don. It's been an absolute pleasure. Where can people find more about. You can reach out Transflow. Yeah absolutely. Transflow.com for transfer related don.everhart@transflow.com I also organize the freight tech landscape at freight tech today and my number is floating out there everywhere. So I also encourage people just call me. I'm a talkative person as I hope was evident today. Yeah, man. It's been a pleasure. Thank you for joining us. Thank you. Going back in the day. Love it. Back in the day and into the future. That's dude, lots of nuggets today. Thanks, Don. Yeah, no problem. If today's episode helped you think differently about your operation, share it with someone in your network who needs to hear it. And if you're looking for tools to help keep your truck rolling from finding quality loads, getting paid quicker, well, truckstop.com is here to help. Go visit truckstop.com to explore the load board rate insights and risk management solutions built specifically for carriers and brokers. Thanks for listening to us at behind the Freight. Until next time, Keep the wheels turning and the bad loads burning.
More from Behind The Freight
All episodes →- The Real Cost of Truck Downtime and Reactive Maintenance with Trent Broberg44 / 100
- Freight Fraud, Double Brokering, and Protecting Your Carrier Authority with Dale Prax55 / 100
- Why the Business of Trucking is Harder Than the Driving with Adam Wingfield
- What Owner-Operators Miss To Be Profitable (Cost Per Mile, Fuel & Margins) with Kevin Rutherford
- Freight Data Explained: Rates, Seasonality, and Market Signals with Avery Vise